8
QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER FOR THE CENTER FOR JUSTICE GOVERNANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION TUNA SAUTI NEWSLETTER | 2015 Foreword Over the past 5years The Center for Justice Governance & Environmental Action (CJGEA) and partners, have successfully implemented the project entitled “Tuna Sauti” which has been central in amplifying the voices of the Owino Uhuru community in Mombasa to advocate for and access to clean environment and socio economic justice. CJGEA has applied a Human Rights Based Approach to Environmental protection in communities affected by the Extractive Industries in Kenya, drawing synergies of awareness on climate change, mitigation and carbon Emissions. The case of Owino Uhuru is one of injustices inflicted on a voiceless community by investors driven by greed to disregard basic human rights in their quest to make super normal profits. The (pb) lead smelters have over time have conducted their business with no regard to the health of their staff and the community living around the area and have continued to wantonly release hazardous emissions into the environment. The “Tuna Sauti” project has enabled us, to penetrate and scrutinize the key processes and systems of government, which are key for the realization of the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. This is as enshrined in Article 69 and 70 of the constitution of Kenya and other regional and international instruments. We have recorded major milestones with the Senate Committee on Health visiting the affected communities. Also after we highlighted the magnitude of the effects of environmental pollution to the Owino Uhuru community, key government agencies like the Center For Disease Control and the Ministry of Health moved in to conduct a prevalence study of children's blood lead and environmental lead samples, to ascertain the effect of the lead smelter to the myriad of health complications afflicting the community members. This report should be out in March 2015 and will be a game changer to our work. Environmental Human Rights is a fairly new concept both In Kenya and Internationally. CJGEA is privileged to be among the pioneers of this concept. It remains factual that there are close linkages between the environment and the enjoyment of human rights, that justify an integrated approach to environment and human rights. Extractive Industry in Kenya for instance, is a powerful method of growing the economy, however if the sector is mismanaged, and exploitation precedes carelessness, natural resource extraction is accompanied by corruption, inequality and human rights violations it leads to irreparable environmental damage which poisons the sources of livelihoods and health of people for generations. This is best depicted in the case of the Owino Uhuru community.

QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER FOR THE CENTER FOR ......TUNA SAUTI NEWSLETTER | 2015 5 3) Miti Kwa Vitukuu “Miti Kwa Vitukuu” meaning “Tree's A Heritage For Our Grand Children”. The

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER FOR THE CENTER FOR

    JUSTICE GOVERNANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION

    TUNA SAUTI NEWSLETTER | 2015

    ForewordOver the past 5years The Center for Justice Governance & Environmental Action (CJGEA) and partners, have successfully implemented the project entitled “Tuna Sauti” which has been central in amplifying the voices of the Owino Uhuru community in Mombasa to advocate for and access to clean environment and socio economic justice.

    CJGEA has applied a Human Rights Based Approach to Environmental protection in communities affectedby the Extractive Industries in Kenya, drawing synergies of awareness on climate change, mitigation and carbon Emissions. The case of Owino Uhuru is one of injustices inflicted on a voiceless community by investors driven by greed to disregard basic human rights in their quest to make super normal profits. The (pb) lead smelters have over time have conducted their business with no regard to the health of their staff and the community living around the area and have continued to wantonly release hazardous emissions into the environment.

    The “Tuna Sauti” project has enabled us, to penetrate and scrutinize the key processes and systems of government, which are key for the realization of the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. This is as enshrined in Article 69 and 70 of the constitution of Kenya and other regional and international instruments.

    We have recorded major milestones with the Senate Committee on Health visiting the affected communities. Also after we highlighted the magnitude of the effects of environmental pollution to the Owino Uhuru community, key government agencies like the Center For Disease Control and the Ministry of Health moved in to conduct a prevalence study of children's blood lead and environmental lead samples, to ascertain the effect of the lead smelter to the myriad of health complications afflicting the community members. This report should be out in March 2015 and will be a game changer to our work.

    Environmental Human Rights is a fairly new concept both In Kenya and Internationally. CJGEA is privileged tobe among the pioneers of this concept. It remains factual that there are close linkages between the environment and the enjoyment of human rights, that justify an integrated approach to environment and human rights. Extractive Industry in Kenya for instance, is a powerful method of growing the economy, however if the sector is mismanaged, and exploitation precedes carelessness, natural resource extraction is accompanied by corruption, inequality and human rights violations it leads to irreparable environmental damage which poisons the sources of livelihoods and health of people for generations. This is best depictedin the case of the Owino Uhuru community.

  • If the environment is not protected the first casualty of the repercussions becomes those that depend directly on the environment for habitat and livelihoods e.g. water. There are three main dimensions of theinter-relationship between human rights and environmental protection:

    The environment as a pre-requisite for the enjoyment of human rights (implying that human rights obligations of States should include the duty to ensure the level of environmental protection necessary to allow the full exercise of protected rights); Certain human rights, especially access to information, participation in decision-making, and access to justice in environmental matters, as essential to good environmental decision-making (implying that human rights must be implemented in order to ensure environmental protection); and The right to a safe, healthy and ecologically balanced environment as a human right in itself (this approach has been debated).

    It is therefore a great opportunity that CJGEA has to ensure responsible involvement through our programmes. It therefore becomes vital that CJGEA can count on all stakeholders involved at all communitylevels to work in concerted effort to create change by ensuring the protection of these rights.

    Phyllis OmidoFounder, CJGEA

    TUNA SAUTI NEWSLETTER | 20152

  • TUNA SAUTI NEWSLETTER | 2015 3

    Introduction

    Center for Justice Governance and Environmental Action was founded in 2009 in response to challenges facing communities residing around Extractive Industries in Kenyan Coastal region. It is registered as Non profit Organization and its operations are guided by its constitution. Overseen by its Board of Governors drawn from the civil Society in Kenya and internationally.

    Our Vision

    In the next decade to have moulded a generation that understands, respects and integrates human rights and the environment

    Our Mission

    To amplify the voices of the economically marginalised communities residing around extractive industries, to courageously call for and enable access to environment and socio-economic justice.

    The mission statement has been realized through actions such as: Supporting and creating space for its communities in their course to challenge the responsibility of the state and Non state actors towards environment protection and access to socio-economic rights to eradicate poverty, injustice and inequality that surrounds communities around extractive industries. Building capacities and awareness of community issues by organising public picketing and media campaigns; and educating communities on local and International instruments available for advocacy e.g. through the dissemination of information, publications, media-work, campaigns and organising events etc.Participation in international networks supporting communities to do the so. Influencing political decision-making that affects the creation of better policies and decision making on Environmental Issues.

    Our Core Values:

    Respect for the Environment.

    Respect for human rights.

    Activism and Service through volunteerism.

    Commitment to justice, Equality and the rule of Law for all.

    Solidarity with the poor and pro poor individuals and agencies.

    CJGEA and its members will Influence political and policy decisionmaking in order to influence sustainable

    Environmental Governance in line with local, regional and international instruments in Kenya

    CJGEA and our membership will work together to influence public opinion in Kenya and increase

    CJGEA'S activities that promote environment and social justice.

    CJGEA strengthen the capacity of its community membership to sustain all environmental movements

    CJGEA's activities have been anchored on the following thematic areas:

    Themes: Climate Change and Environmental Governance, Activism and Human rights, Legal Aid, Education and Empowerment.

    Target groups: Communities around extractive Industries, Poor and Vulnerable, government, political leaders, Industrialists, MPs and civil servants, global processes in joint CSO-campaigns & advocacy work

    Cjgea´s Strategic Objectives

  • TUNA SAUTI NEWSLETTER | 20154

    CJGEA's Key Projects 2015

    1) Tuna Sauti PIL

    Introduction and Background

    Lead (Pb) smelting industries have been cropping up in the slum neighbourhoods around Changamwe area in Mombasa County in the past decades. Since the commencement of these industries' activities, the surrounding communities have reported negative environment and health repercussions. Children have visible symptoms of lead poisoning and blood tests carried out randomly in the community revealed that all people tested had above-normal blood lead levels (BLL) according to WHO standards. The tests on vegetation, soil, and air and storm water also recorded dangerous lead levels.

    These industries have direct impact on the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment of people and where they live. Laws and institutions were set up to regulate the activities and the likely violation of peoples rights from these industries. However, the enforcement of these laws has been wanting and have not provided any solace to the affected communities.

    CJGEA has pioneered the integration of human rights in environmental protection in Kenya through the introduction of a class action seeking accountability from state organs in charge of public health and environment protection and to seek redress for the affected people who cannot afford seeking justice on their own. Kenya's new constitution sets out rules facilitating actions against state organs as well as public interest proceedings, including class actions suits. In addition to supporting people to realize their human rights and seek redress for the violations, CJGEA has also moved to hold the State to enhance the protection of its citizens from the effects of pollution caused by the smelting industries.

    The aim of this project is to mainstream human rights based approach towards dealing with environmental issues. This has been achieved through setting legal precedents, human rights training, media fellowships and awareness campaigns designed in handling human rights perspectives towards the extractive industry sector in Kenya. CJGEA also works to influence changes in environmental policy, based on the promotion of social justice and sustainable development through human rights realization.

    The project's framework consist of a series of actions that seek to change in the implementation of Kenyan environmental legislation, leading to more efficient enforcement of existing legal and administrative mechanisms in the way to handle environmental issues. In undertaking these actions, the affected community have become empowered to voice their concerns and also promote harmonious co-existence of natural, human and industrial resources. The project aims to leverage these actions to ensure a safe region for all its inhabitants through the use of the new constitutional dispensation.

    This project seeks to challenge the responsibility of state and non-state actors, towards environment and protection of other socio-economic rights, including the corporate responsibility of all players that has leadto the Mass Poisoning of the Owino Uhuru community. “Tuna Sauti” seeks to not only challenge the State toenforce the constitution and the private actors to respect their environmental/Human rights responsibilities, but also to give voice to those that are systematically not listened to, and cause these voices to resound and bring about tangible change that will positively affect Kenya and create a platform for accountability from the leaders resulting to protecting the human right to a clean and a healthy environment.

    2) Media Fellowship And Capacity Building Project

    The Overall Objective of this project is to conduct a media fellowship on the right to a clean and healthy environment in a human rights based approach, by using media engagement strategies coupled with civil society activism to challenge violations occurring in business and environment systems; inappropriate state and non-state action.

  • TUNA SAUTI NEWSLETTER | 2015 5

    3) Miti Kwa Vitukuu

    “Miti Kwa Vitukuu” meaning “Tree's A Heritage For Our Grand Children”.

    The Project goal is to stop logging without mitigation and promote afforestation as climate change mitigation

    4) Right to Environment Education Project

    “ELIMU BORA SI BORA ELIMU” translated as give quality education not whatever education

    The Right to Education is enshrined in many international instruments and in the Kenyan constitution Article 43 Section ( 1) subsection ( f). Part of the solution to environment protection is the need to educate our masses and have qualified environment experts entrenched into our environmental systems. Effective environmental education is about education in, about, and for the environment. It doesn't reach its full potential until learners have personalized their knowledge, made decisions on how to address issues, and reflected on that action.

    Involvement of CJGEA in Issues of Environment and social justice of vulnerable groups is one of the mandates of CJGEA. In this case conducting advocacy both in court and outside in order to raise both the public and policy makers' awareness of the country's laxity in Environmental management Issues including the right to environmental education.

    The campaign is vital for supporting national efforts to achieve education for all and promote learning at all levels. This intervention is especially very timely considering the growth of the Extractive industry in Kenya especiallly the oil and Gas sector. Even though Kenya was the Host of the first ever UNEA conference and proudly hosts the UNEP head quarters, it has continues to be a violator of Environmental rights. Exampleis the Owino Uhuru lead poisoning case. Kenya must walk the talk and it begins with the basics of allowing scholars in the area of Environment to emerge from its Education system. The Lead poisoning case has enabled us to penetrate and scrutinize the key processes and systems of government which are key for the realization of the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment as enshrined in Article 69 and 70 of the constitution of Kenya. Unfortunately, Lack of expertise is one of the main failures of environmental systems in Kenya.

    Chronology of the course

    The origin of Environmental and Biosystems Engineering at the University of Nairobi can be traced back to1965 when the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering introduced a section in Agricultural Engineering focusing on Agricultural Process Engineering. The Department of Agricultural Engineering of University of Nairobi was established in 1975 originally as the Department of Agricultural Mechanization and Farm planning. The name was then changed in 1976 to Department of Agricultural Engineering.

    In 2003, the University of Nairobi senate ratified the change of name of the Department and the degree program to Environmental and Biosystems engineering to reflect the content and intent of the Department's academic, research and consultancy services and to keep in tune with the expanding global challenges and demands.

    As a University Department, the objectives of teaching, research, development and advancement of scientific knowledge in the application of Environmental engineering is captured through a dynamic curricular offered through undergraduate and post graduate programmes. So far more than 550 graduates and 105 masters' students and 6 PhD students have graduated from the department.

  • TUNA SAUTI NEWSLETTER | 20156

    The specific objective of the programme is to produce engineers who will fulfill the requirements of potential employers in various engineering fields and in particular bio-processing systems design, design and development of farm machinery, energy resources management, design and production of bio-processing machines and structures, environmental waste management, irrigation and drainage engineering, soil and water conservation and environmental management.

    Admission requirementsThe regulations and entry requirements of the Faculty of Engineering . Specifics of the same are outlined below.

    Categories of Applicants:Candidates shall be eligible for admission into the Bachelor of Science Degree in the Faculty of Engineering in the following categories:

    Candidates with KCSE :For candidates with KCSE the basic admission requirement shall be the minimum entry requirement set for entry into the Public Universities, which is at least an average grade of C + in the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE). In addition candidates are expected to have performed they’ll in of the following alternative cluster of subjects in KCSE Examinations, but at any rate shall have obtained at least a grade of C + in each of the cluster subjects, as theyll as in the English Language .

    Alternative A :PhysicsChemistryMathematicsBiology or Geography or any Group IV subject excluding Home Science

    Alternative B :Physical SciencesBiological SciencesMathematicsGeography or any Group IV subject excluding Home Science

    Group IV Subjects :Home SciencePotheyr MechanicsArt and DesignElectricityAgriculture

    Drawing and DesignWoodworkAviation TechnologyMetalworkComputer Studies

    Candidates with KCSE who have obtained a grade below C + , but at least a C - , in only one cluster subjectshall be allotheyd to take a bridging course in that subject to bring it to the grade of C + or better, providedthat such a bridging course shall be taken at the University of Nairobi.

    Candidates with A-Levels or International Baccalaureate (IB) :The candidates shall have a minimum entry requirement of 2 Principal Level passes in Mathematics and Physics and a Subsidiary Level pass in Chemistry with a credit pass in English at at 'O' Level, except that forSurveying, a Subsidiary Level pass in Geography shall also be acceptable in lieu of Chemistry.

  • TUNA SAUTI NEWSLETTER | 2015 7

    Candidates with Higher National Diploma or Equivalent:Candidates with Higher National Diploma in the following broad areas of study:

    Agricultural EngineeringCivil EngineeringElectrical/Electronic EngineeringMechanical EngineeringSurveyingAny other approved subject area.

    Candidates with Ordinary Diploma or Equivalent:Candidates with an Ordinary Diploma with a Credit Pass in the following broad areas of study:

    Agricultural EngineeringCivil EngineeringElectrical/Electronic EngineeringMechanical EngineeringSurveyingAny other approved subject area.

    Candidates with Diplomas from Science/ Technical Teacher Training Colleges:The candidates shall have Diploma with Credit Pass in Mathematics and Physics.

    Candidates with BSc. or BEd. (Science):The candidates shall have BSc. or BEd. (Science) Honours Degrees, majoring in Physics or Mathematics, or equivalent from recognized institutions.

    The genesis of the stalemate between government and the students.

    In Kenya, Engineers Registration Board of Kenya is the body mandated by law to define categories of engineers, technologists and technicians. ERB is required by law to register persons who have follotheyd are recognized structured curriculum and have demonstrated competency in their field of engineering.

    Currently there are 18 engineering programmes recognized by Engineers Registration Board of Kenya as offering opportunities towards registration, although there are 30 engineering degree programmes offered in public universities. Environmental and Biosystems Engineering is offered at the University of Nairobi but is currently not recognized by the Engineers Registration Board of Kenya. After admission, the students were informed that the course was not recognized by the Engineering Registration Board. They however were assured that they would get jobs upon completion of the course as those who had graduated before them had no problems finding jobs.

    rd thProblems begun in the 3 year of the course with a students strike begining on the 11 of November 2014 after learning from unidentifiable sources that students who graduate with a degree in any engineering course that is not recognized by the EBK would not be able to practice engineering in any organization in and outside

    st Kenya. Students peacefully marched to the EBK OFFICES in Transcom house 1 floor on ngong road to find out the reasons as to why the course was not recognized. The office was closed on there arrival with all members of staff disappearing with nowhere to be found. The decision was then reached to boycott classes inorder to put pressure on the school department to follow up on the issue. The EBK agreed to take the matter into consideration and requested a two week period inorder to deliberate the issues with members of the committee. The department was also requested to submit the CV's of all the lecturers and an outline of the units that are taught from first to fifth year. They also paid a fee of about Ksh 300,000.

  • TUNA SAUTI NEWSLETTER | 20158

    Objectives

    To challenge the state to enforcement of the right to EducationTo get the University's administration, to allow the students to finish the course with relevant accreditation.To undertake strategic litigation, to protect right to Education for the Environmental student.To Challenge the existing Lack of Expertise in the Environmental administrative systems and bodies eg. NEMA and the ministry of Water, environment and Natural resources in Kenya.To challenge the current culture of lack of investment in emission management by business in Kenya, due to lack of local expertise.To promote accountability and transparency and defend human rights and the rule of law by challenging the mandate of the EBK and the roles and draconian powers vested in such bodies like the EBK in Kenya

    Activities involved

    Have 3 sessions involving all the students affected to sensitize them on the right to Education and involve them in the campaign.Have sessions with all the student leaders across the country to solicit support for the affected students.Write an initial letter to the Dean of Education under Article 47 Section (2) to seek a response from theUniversity.Engage a local counsel to bring the case to court under Urgent petitions to challenge the responsibilities of the Duty bearerEngage in Media campaignsWrite to the UN special reporter on the right to Education and request an urgent intervention on behalf of the students.Carry out three weeks sensitization in all the universities across the country with focus on the Environmental fraternity to solicit there involvement in a one day picketing campaign.Stage a Nationwide campaign on the right to Education.Write to the cabinet secretary Education seeking the reversal of the decision to stop this course.Ensure the protection of the student's against victimization.Involve local and international activists in the case.Get a petition signed by activists and students nation wide.Engage a reputable council on behalf of the students to bring the matter to court for a decision.

    1.11.

    111.1V.

    V.

    V1.

    1)

    2)3)

    4)

    5)6)

    7)

    8)9)

    10)11)12)