Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

  • Upload
    jlbalb

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    1/28

    The OperatorApproach

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    2/28

    Previously we solved the Schrdinger equation to obtain the wavefunctions andenergy levels of a quantum-mechanical HARMONIC OSCILLATOR

    * The energy levels are QUANTIZED in terms of the oscillator frequency w while the wavefunctions correspond to HERMITE POLYNOMIALS with aFINITE range

    The Operator Approach

    )27.13(,2,1,0,21 nn E n

    ENERGY LEVELS , WAVEFUNCTIONS (LEFT) AND PROBABILITY DENSITY (RIGHT) FOR THE QUANTUM HARMONIC OSCILLATOR THE PICTURE BOOK OF QUANTUM MECHANICS, S. BRANDT and H-D. DAHMEN, SPRINGER-VERLAG, NEW YORK (1995)

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    3/28

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    4/28

    Motivated by Equation 14.2 we define the new OPERATORS

    * It is easy to show that MULTIPLICATION of these two operators yieldsthe following result

    * If we REVERSEthe order of multiplication however we obtain the followingresult

    The Operator Approach

    )3.14(2

    1xim

    xima

    )4.14(21

    )(21 2

    2

    xm xim

    aa

    )5.14(21

    )(21 2

    2

    xm xim

    aa

    : KEEP THE ORDER OF THE OPERATORS AND NOTE THAT d (fx )dx = x (df /dx ) + f

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    5/28

    Comparison of Equations 14.4 & 14.5 reveals that the result of multiplying theoperators depends on the ORDERin which they are multiplied

    * With these definitions our original Schrdinger equation (Equation 14.1) cannow be REWRITTEN as

    * We now notice something interesting if we perform the following operation

    The Operator Approach

    )6.14( aaaa

    )7.14()()(21

    x E xaa

    )8.14()(21

    xaaa

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    6/28

    We can EXPAND Equation 14.8 so that it yields

    * Equation 14.9 shows that if (x ) satisfies the Schrdinger equation withenergy E then a + (x ) ALSO satisfies the Schrdinger equation but with energy E + h

    * If we know one initial solution to the Schrdinger equation then we can usethe operator a + to determine ALL OTHERsolutions!

    The Operator Approach

    )(21

    )(21

    )(21

    xaaa xaaaa xaaa

    )()()()(21 x x E a x xaaa

    )9.14()()( xa E

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    7/28

    ALTERNATIVELY we could use the operator a - to demonstrate that

    * Equation 14.10 shows that if (x ) satisfies the Schrdinger equation withenergy E then a - (x ) ALSO satisfies the Schrdinger equation but with energy E -h

    * If we know one initial solution to the Schrdinger equation then we canequally use the operator a - to determine ALL OTHERsolutions

    The Operator Approach

    )(21

    )(21

    )(21

    xaaa xaaaa xaaa

    )()()()(21 x x E a x xaaa

    )10.14()()( xa E

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    8/28

    The operators a are referred to as LADDER OPERATORSsince they allow us todetermine ALLallowed energy levels of the harmonic oscillator from a knowledgeof just ONE level

    * a + is known as the CREATION or RAISING operator since it allows us todetermine HIGHER levels from an initial energy solution

    * a - is known as the ANNIHILATION or LOWERING operator since it allowsus to determine LOWERlevels from an initial energy solution

    The Operator Approach

    E

    E +

    E + 2

    E + 3

    E - 3

    E - 2

    E -

    a +

    a -

    THE BASIC CONCEPT OF THE LADDER OPERATORS IS ILLUSTRATED SCHEMATICALLY IN THIS FIGURE

    THE IDEA IS THAT WE ASSUME THAT WE CAN START FROM SOME INITIAL KNOWN SOLUTION WITH ENERGY E

    SUCCESSIVE APPLICATION OF THE CREATION OPERATOR a + THEN ALLOWS US TO DETERMINE HIGHER ENERGY LEVELS WHILE APPLICATION OF THE ANNIHILATION OPERATOR ALLOWS US TO DETERMINE LOWER ENERGY LEVELS

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    9/28

    Now the preceding discussion suggests that if we repeatedly apply theannihilation operator we should eventually reach a set of states with NEGATIVEenergy!

    * Since such states are physically MEANINGLESS there must instead be aMINIMUM state with positive energy that represents the lowest rung of ourenergy ladder

    * That is we assume the existence of a wavefunction solution y 0(x ) such that

    * Expanding Equation 14.11 we arrive at the following condition on y 0(x )

    The Operator Approach

    )11.14(0)(2

    10)( 00 x xim xim

    or xa

    )12.14()()( 00 x xm x

    x

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    10/28

    Equation 14.12 can be easily solved to yield the GROUND-STATE wavefunction

    * We now need to determine the ENERGYassociated with this wavefunctionwhich we do by substitution into the Schrdinger equation

    Since by definition a - 0 = 0 Equation 14.14 reduces to the SIMPLEresult

    The Operator Approach

    20

    0

    0

    2)(ln

    )()(

    xm

    x xdxm

    x xd

    )13.14(2

    exp)( 200 xm A x

    )14.14()()(2

    1000 x E xaa

    )14.14(21

    )()(21

    0000 E x E x

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    11/28

    Having determined the ground-state energy of the harmonic oscillator thecreation operator can be used to generate the quantized SET of energy levels

    * This result follows by remembering that each time we apply the creationoperator we INCREASE the energy by h w

    * The wavefunctions of the excited energy levels can also be reconstructed inthe same way

    These solutions are in fact IDENTICAL to those obtained previously(Equations 13.27 & 13.32) by analytic solution of the Schrdinger equation

    The Operator Approach

    )15.14(,2,1,0,21

    nn E n

    )16.14(2

    exp)()()()( 20 xm

    a A xa x nn

    n

    n

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    12/28

    Determine the normalization constant 0(0) in the ground-state wavefunction

    Solution: For normalization we require an expression for 0(0) such that

    By exploiting the fact that

    We arrive at the following condition for the normalization constant

    Examples

    )13.13(2

    exp)( 200 xm

    A x

    1exp 20*0

    dx x

    m A A

    adxax / exp 2

    4 / 1

    0

    2 / 1

    0*0 1

    m A

    m A A

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    13/28

    Use the following operator relation to determine the GENERALnormalizationcoefficient An in Equation 14.16

    Solution: We begin by making the change of variables n n 1

    We can use this last relation to generate FURTHER wavefunctionsolutions

    )17.14()()1()( 1 xni xa nn

    )()()()( 11 xani

    x xni xannnn

    )(2

    )( 12 xai

    x

    )(1

    )( 01 xai

    x

    )()2(

    )( 32 xani

    xnn

    )()1(

    )( 21 xani

    xnn

    Examples

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    14/28

    By COMBINING the series of wavefunctions generated above we obtain anexpression for n (x ) in terms of 0(x )

    We have seen already however that the n th wavefunction can be written as

    From a comparison of Equations 14.16 & 14.18 we see that thenormalization constant

    )18.14(2

    exp)()(!

    )()()(

    )(!

    )()( 2

    4 / 1

    0 xm

    am

    n

    i xa

    n

    i x n

    n

    nn

    n

    n

    n

    )16.14(2

    exp)()( 2xm

    a A x nnn

    )19.14()(!

    )(4 / 1

    m

    n

    i A

    n

    n

    n

    Examples (cont d)

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    15/28

    Thus far we have focused on the solutions of the TIME-INDEPENDENT Schrdingerequation for a particle that moves in a HARMONIC potential

    * The wavefunctions and probability density obtained for this problem take the form

    Superposition States

    THE PROBABILITY DENSITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE FIRST FIVE ENERGY LEVELS OF A HARMONIC OSCILLATOR

    THESE PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS ARE INDEPENDENT OF TIME SINCE THEY DERIVE FROM WAVEFUNCTIONS THAT ARE STATIONARY STATES

    THE PICTURE BOOK OF QUANTUM MECHANICS S. BRANDT and H-D. DAHMEN, SPRINGER-VERLAG,NEW YORK (1995)

    )32.13(

    !2

    1)( 2 /

    4 / 12 xm

    nnne x

    m H

    n

    m x

    )1.15(!2

    1)()( / 2

    2 / 1* 2 xm

    nnnne x

    m H

    n

    m x x

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    16/28

    We now wish to discuss the DYNAMICS of a quantum-mechanical particle thatmoves in the presence of a harmonic potential

    * We immediately run into a PROBLEMhowever since the wavefunctions ofEquation 13.32 are STATIONARY STATES whose probability density is timeINDEPENDENT

    Recall that the stationary states have time-dependent wavefunctions of

    the form

    The probability density associated with this wavefunction is easily

    calculated

    Superposition States

    )2.15(exp)0,(),( t E

    i xt x nnn

    t E

    i xt E

    i xt xt x nnn

    nnn exp)0,(exp)0,(),(),(**

    )3.15()0,()0,(* x xn

    THE PROBABILITY DENSITY IS INDEPENDENT OF TIME!

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    17/28

    To overcome this problem we note that a more GENERALsolution to theSchrdinger equation is obtained by taking a LINEAR SUPERPOSITION ofstationary-state wavefunctions

    * The TIME EVOLUTION of this wavefunction is now given by

    * As we will discuss in further detail an important property of the stationarystate wavefunctions is that they define a so-called ORTHONORMAL SET

    The condition of orthonormality can be expressed as

    Superposition States

    )3.15()()(n

    nn xc x

    )4.15(exp)(),(n

    nnn t

    E i xct x

    )5.15(

    ,0

    ,1

    ,)()(*

    k n

    k n

    dx x x nk nk k n

    d nk IS THE KRONECKER DELTA

    FUNCTION

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    18/28

    By exploiting the orthonormality of the stationary-state solutions the expansioncoefficients in Equation 15.3 can be determined

    * Another important result follows from the NORMALIZATION condition forthe wavefunction

    Superposition States

    dx xc xdx x xn

    nnnn )()()()(**

    )6.15()()(* nnnn cdx x xc

    1)()(1)()(***

    dx xc xcdx x x n nnn nn

    )7.15(11)()( *** n

    nnn

    nnnn ccdx x xcc

    NORMALIZATION RELATION FOR THE EXPANSION COEFFICIENTS

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    19/28

    An important feature of the linear superposition of stationary states is that itresults in a WAVE PACKET whose properties now EVOLVEwith time

    * Consider for example the expectation value of the POSITION of the wavepacket

    By introducing Equation 15.3 for the wavefunction this expectation maybe written as

    Harmonic Particle Motion

    dxt x xt xt x xt xt x ),(),()),(),,(()( *

    dxe x xce xct xk

    t iE k k

    n

    t iE nn

    k n / / ** )()()(

    dx x x xecc k nn k t E E i

    k nk n

    )()(* / )(*

    )8.15( / )(* nk n k

    t E E i

    k n xecc k n

    NOTE HOW WE DEFINE THE MATRIX ELEMENT x nk

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    20/28

    To compute the expectation value of the position we now have to evaluate theMATRIX ELEMENT x nk that appears in Equation 15.8

    * By exploiting the properties of Hermite polynomials (see Appendix) it can beshown that the matrix element reduces to

    * Substituting this expression into Equation 15.8 we arrive at the followingresult for the expectation value of the position

    We have exploited here the fact that E n E k = (n k )h so that E n E n - 1 =h

    Harmonic Particle Motion

    )9.15(2

    12 1,1, nk nk nk

    nnm

    x

    )10.15()(2)(*

    11*2 / 1

    n

    t inn

    t inn ecceccnmt x

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    21/28

    Since the expansion coefficients c n may be COMPLEXquantities we can writethem in POLARform

    * With this definition we can then rewrite Equation 15.10 as

    * If the PHASE ANGLE n n 1 = where is a CONSTANT independent ofn and if the expansion coefficients c n are of EQUAL magnitude then Equation15.12 becomes

    Harmonic Particle Motion

    )11.15(ni

    nnecc

    )12.15()cos(2

    )( 1*

    1*

    12n

    nnnnnn t ccccnmt x

    )13.15()cos()cos(2

    )( *2 t xt cc E

    mt x o

    nnnn

    THIS TERM IS THE EXPECTATION VALUE

    OF E

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    22/28

    Equation 15.13 shows that the expectation value of the wavepacket in theparabolic potential OSCILLATES as a function of time

    * The oscillations occur at the SAME frequency ( ) of the classical oscillator* From the figures below we see that the WIDTH of the wavepacket also

    oscillates but at TWICE the frequency of the classical oscillatorThe width of the packet is narrowest at the classical TURNING

    POINTS where the velocity of the classical particle is zero

    Harmonic Particle Motion

    MOTION OF A WAVE PACKET IN A HARMONIC POTENTIAL CIRCLES SHOW THE MOTION OF A CLASSICAL PARTICLE THE SAME MOTION IS SHOWN IN MORE DETAIL OVER HALF AN OSCILLATION CYCLE

    THE PICTURE BOOK OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

    S. BRANDT and H-D. DAHMEN, SPRINGER-VERLAG, NEW YORK (1995)

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    23/28

    Instead of a wavepacket what is the corresponding variation of the positionexpectation in one of the STATIONARY states?

    * For such a state ALLcoefficients but one are equal to zero so that Equation15.10 reduces to

    The expectation value is ZERO for ALLtimes as we expect for thestationary states which have SYMMETRICprobability densities

    Harmonic Particle Motion

    )14.15(0)(2

    )( * 11*2 / 1

    n

    t inn

    t inn ecceccnm

    t x

    THE PROBABILITY DENSITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE FIRST FIVE ENERGY LEVELS OF A HARMONIC OSCILLATOR

    NOTE THAT THESE PROBABILITY DENSITIES ARE ALL SYMMETRIC ABOUT THE ORIGIN OF MOTION AND SO GIVE RISE TO AN EXPECTATION VALUE FOR THE POSITION THAT IS EQUAL TO ZERO AT ALL TIMES

    THE PICTURE BOOK OF QUANTUM MECHANICS S. BRANDT and H-D. DAHMEN, SPRINGER-VERLAG,NEW YORK (1995)

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    24/28

    The other quantity in which we are interested is the expectation value of theMOMENTUM

    * The SIMPLEST way to determine this quantity is to note that we expect thefollowing relation to hold

    * By differentiating Equation 15.10 with respect with time we obtain thefollowing result

    The time dependence of this equation is IDENTICAL to that ofEquation 15.10We therefore expect that the expectation value of the momentum

    should also OSCILLATE as a function of time

    Harmonic Particle Motion

    )15.15()()()( t xdt d

    mt vmt p

    )10.15()(2

    )( * 11*2 / 1

    n

    t inn

    t inn ecceccn

    mit p

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    25/28

    Under conditions where the assumptions that lead to Equation 15.13 hold theexpectation value of the momentum can be APPROXIMATEDas

    * Note that the oscillations of the position and momentum are OUT of phaseThis is just what we EXPECT for the harmonic oscillator which is atREST when its displacement is MAXIMALand moves FASTEST when itsdisplacement is ZERO

    )13.15()sin()sin(2)( * t pt cc E mt p on

    nnn

    Harmonic Particle Motion

    A

    A B

    THE TWO POINTS LABELED A CORRESPOND TO THE MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENT OF THE HARMONIC OSCILLATOR AND AT THESE POINTS THE PARTICLE IS INSTANTANEOUSLY STATIONARY

    THE POINT LABELED B CORRESPONDS TO THE CENTER OF THE HARMONIC MOTION WHERE THE DISPLACEMENT OF THE PARTICLE IS EQUAL TO ZERO

    THE PARTICLE IS MOVING WITH ITS HIGHEST VELOCITY HERE AND SO THE EXPECTATION VALUE OF THE MOMENTUM IS CONSEQUENTLY MAXIMAL

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    26/28

    In this section we consider how to evaluate the MATRIX ELEMENTS

    * As we have seen the wavefunctions y n (x ) correspond to HERMITE

    POLYNOMIALS

    * So that Equation A15.1 can be rewritten as

    )1.15()()(* Adx x x x x k nnk

    Appendix

    )32.13(,)(!2

    1)( 2 /

    4 / 12

    xm

    e H n

    m x nnn

    )2.15()()(!!2

    1 2 Ad e H H

    mk n x k nk nnk

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    27/28

    To evaluate the integral in Equation A15.2 shall need our DEFINITIONS of thegenerating function

    * Rather than compute Equation A15.2 directly we first construct the moreGENERALintegral

    * Equation A15.3 may be rewritten using Equations A13.2 & A13.9 as

    Appendix

    )3.15(),(),(22 Ad et F sF I

    )9.13(),(222 )(2

    AeeesF sss

    )2.13(!

    )(),(0

    Ans

    H sF n

    n

    n

    )4.15()()(!!

    222222 22)()( Ad e H H k nt s

    d eee k nn k

    k nt s

  • 8/14/2019 Quantum mechanics course microsoftpowerpoint-harmonicoscillator-operatorapproach

    28/28

    The LHS of Equation A15.4 can be evaluated explicitly to yield

    * Comparing the coefficients of equal powers of s n

    t k

    l p

    we obtain the value of auseful integral

    * For example the integral in Equation A15.2 is obtained by setting p = 1 which yields

    Using Equation A15.7 the matrix element of Equation A15.2 can becomputed and hence the expectation value of the position can be determined(Equation 15.10)

    Appendix

    )5.15()(2)()(22222

    Aed ee t sst t st sst

    )6.15()()( 2 Ad e H H pk n

    )7.15())1(2(!2)()( 1,1,12

    Annd e H H nk nk

    n

    k n