12
Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh Huynh 1) , Ngoc-Loi Dang 2) , Joo-Young Ryu 2) and *Jeong-Tae Kim 3) 1), 2, 3) Department of Ocean Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea *) [email protected] ABSTRACT As the impedance monitoring technique has been successfully implemented on various types of structures, the quantitative damage detection by the impedance-based technique has become an important issue for complex structural connections. Since the impedance-based technique is not based on any particular physical models, it is very difficult to quantitatively correlate the change in impedance signatures to the change in structural properties. In this study, the severity of damage in tendon anchorage caused by the loss of tendon forces is quantitatively identified by using the PZT interface-based impedance monitoring technique. Firstly, a prototype of PZT interface is designed for the impedance monitoring of tendon anchorage. Next, impedance signatures are experimentally measured from a lab-scaled tendon-anchorage system under different prestress-force levels. Finally, damage severities of the tendon anchorage caused by the loss of prestress-force are quantitatively identified from a phase-by-phase model updating process, in which changes in the measured impedance signatures are correlated to changes in structural properties. 1. INTRODUCTION Many researchers have studied the impedance-based damage detection in structural systems during the past decade. The primary advantages of the impedance- based technique include (1) the technique is not model-based, so it can be easily applied to complex structures; (2) the technique uses small, cheap, lightweight, fast response, and non-instructive sensors; (3) the technique itself is very sensitive to small damage-size; and (4) the technique can be integrated with a wireless impedance sensing network to perform auto-monitoring. By taking the above advantages, the impedance-based technique has been applied for structural health monitoring of tendon anchorage systems (Liang et al. 1994, Kim et al. 2010, Nguyen and Kim 2012, Huynh 1) PhD 2) Graduate Student 3) Professor

Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed …...Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed …...Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh

Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating

Thanh-Canh Huynh1), Ngoc-Loi Dang2), Joo-Young Ryu2)

and *Jeong-Tae Kim3)

1), 2, 3) Department of Ocean Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea *) [email protected]

ABSTRACT

As the impedance monitoring technique has been successfully implemented on various types of structures, the quantitative damage detection by the impedance-based technique has become an important issue for complex structural connections. Since the impedance-based technique is not based on any particular physical models, it is very difficult to quantitatively correlate the change in impedance signatures to the change in structural properties. In this study, the severity of damage in tendon anchorage caused by the loss of tendon forces is quantitatively identified by using the PZT interface-based impedance monitoring technique. Firstly, a prototype of PZT interface is designed for the impedance monitoring of tendon anchorage. Next, impedance signatures are experimentally measured from a lab-scaled tendon-anchorage system under different prestress-force levels. Finally, damage severities of the tendon anchorage caused by the loss of prestress-force are quantitatively identified from a phase-by-phase model updating process, in which changes in the measured impedance signatures are correlated to changes in structural properties. 1. INTRODUCTION

Many researchers have studied the impedance-based damage detection in

structural systems during the past decade. The primary advantages of the impedance-based technique include (1) the technique is not model-based, so it can be easily applied to complex structures; (2) the technique uses small, cheap, lightweight, fast response, and non-instructive sensors; (3) the technique itself is very sensitive to small damage-size; and (4) the technique can be integrated with a wireless impedance sensing network to perform auto-monitoring. By taking the above advantages, the impedance-based technique has been applied for structural health monitoring of tendon anchorage systems (Liang et al. 1994, Kim et al. 2010, Nguyen and Kim 2012, Huynh

1) PhD 2) Graduate Student 3) Professor

Page 2: Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed …...Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh

and Kim 2014, Huynh et al. 2014, 2016). As the impedance monitoring technique has been successfully implemented on the tendon anchorage, the quantitative damage detection by the impedance-based technique has become an important issue. Most of experimental studies used the impedance technique for qualitative health monitoring (Chaudhry et al. 1996, Park G. et al. 2001, Kim et al. 2010, Park et al. 2015, Huynh and Kim 2016, Nguyen et al. 2017). In these applications, the impedance signatures have been qualitatively classified for the alert of damage occurrence due to the target structure’s complexity and the difficulty in high-frequency modelling.

Up-to-date, few researchers have reported on the quantitative health monitoring in structural joints using the impedance-based method. Ritdumrongkul et al. (2004) employed the spectral element method to model the PZT-bolted joint and applied a mathematical technique to quantitatively estimate structural parameters of the joint. In their study, the considered frequency band was relatively low, less than 2.5 kHz, as compared to the ones commonly used in reality. Lopes et al. (2000) and Min et al. (2012) combined the impedance-based technique with the ANN (artificial neural network) to estimate damage types and severities in joints. However, a large amount of the impedance records should be conducted on the target structure under both intact and damage states that could limit the application of their methods to realistic structures.

In this study, the severity of damage in tendon anchorage caused by the loss of tendon forces is quantitatively identified by using the PZT interface-based impedance monitoring and model updating technique. Firstly, a prototype of PZT interface is designed for the impedance monitoring of tendon anchorage. Next, impedance signatures are experimentally measured from a lab-scaled tendon-anchorage system under different prestress-force levels. Finally, damage severities of the tendon anchorage caused by the loss of prestress-force are quantitatively identified from a phase-by-phase model updating process, in which changes in the measured impedance signatures are correlated to changes in structural properties. 2. PZT INTERFACE-BASED IMPEDANCE MONITORING METHOD

2.1 Prototype of Mountable PZT Interface To predetermine effective frequency bands in impedance-based damage

detection, a mountable PZT interface device was developed by Huynh and Kim (2014). The interface prototype is a beam-like structure with a PZT patch at the center, see Fig. 1(a). The interface device has a flexible beam section in the middle and the fixed-fixed boundary by two outside contact bodies. The flexible section, where the PZT sensor is installed, is intentionally designed to allow flexural vibrations of the interface according to piezoelectric deformations of the PZT. The two contact bodies of the PZT interface allows it to be easily attached and detached from the target structure.

As shown in Fig. 1(b), the PZT interface is surface-mounted on the host structure to monitor the changes in its structural properties which can be induced by any structural damage. Under the excitation of the PZT sensor, the PZT interface interacts with the mother structure via the coupling vibrations. If the mother structure is damaged, the coupling dynamic responses could be altered, making the variation of the EM

Page 3: Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed …...Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh

impedan

2.2Se

the PZTresonandynamicinterfaceinterfacethe intemodulusdamping2015).

A interfacewas appharmoniof the PZnumericpeak fre

Mothe first them, M

nce respon

(a) PrototypFi

2 Local Dyensitive freT interface nt peaks ofc charactere device we’s materiaerface. Thes E = 70.0g loss fact

(a) Geo

FE model e was discplied, as ic excitatioZT patch,

cal impedaequencies wodal analyfour mode

Mode 1 is

nses obtain

pe of PZT inig. 1 Desig

ynamic Chaequency ra

for whichf the imperistics of th

was selecteal. A PZT pe propertie0 GPa, Potor = 0.0

ometric sizeFi

of the PZTcretized by shown in

on voltage and the bo

ance respowere ident

ysis was nue shapes out-of-plan

ned from th

nterface gn of PZT i

aracteristicanges of im its dynam

edance sighe PZT inted, as showpatch sizedes of the

oisson's rat02. The P

es g. 2 Geom

T interface608 solid Fig. 2(b).with an am

ottom one onses of thified at 19.umerically representinne longitud

he interfac

(bnterface d

cs of PZT Impedance mic characgnatures. Tterface. Fown in Fig. d 15x15x0aluminum

tio = 0.3PZT patch

metries of P

e was esta

elements . To acqumplitude owas set ashe PZT in.18 kHz anperformedng the modinal flexur

e.

) PZT interfevice (Huy

Interfacesignatures

cteristics isThus, it is or that purp

2(a). Alu0.51 mm3 wm interface33, mass dh was add

(b) MeshingPZT interfa

blished byand the fix

uire the Ef 1 V was s the grounterface, in

nd 38.44 kHd for the PZodal vibratiral motion

face-host stynh and Ki

s can be cs closely aneeded to

pose, an exuminum wawas installee are specdensity =ed by PZT

g and bounce (mm)

y COMSOLxed-fixed bM impedasimulated

nd electrodn which theHz, respecZT interfacons of theand Mode

tructure intem 2014)

controlled associated o analyze xample of as selecteed at the mcified as: = 2700 kgT-5A (Huy

dary condit

L Multiphysboundary cance respo to the topde. Figure e first and

ctively. ce. Figure e interfacee 4 is out-

eraction

by using with the the local the PZT d for the

middle of Young's /m3, and

ynh et al.

tions

sics. The condition onses, a p surface 3 shows

d second

4 shows . Among -of-plane

Page 4: Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed …...Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh

lateral finterfacekHz (Mocharacte

Fig.

3. IMPE

3.As

test stru

flexural moe identical ode 1) aneristics of t

. 4 Modal s

DANCE M

1 Test Sets shown inucture. A 7

otion. By to the two

nd 37.923 the PZT int

Fig. 3 Num

shapes of P

MONITORIN

tup of Lab-n Fig. 5(a), 7-wire mon

comparingo impedankHz (Mod

terface.

merical im

PZT interfasignatures

NG OF LA

-scaled Caa lab-scal

no tendon

g Fig. 3 wnce peaks de 4) that

pedance re

ace identics (Huynh e

AB-SCALE

ble Structule tendon a(15.2 mm

with Fig. 4were num

t mainly r

esponses

cal to resonet al. 2015)

E TENDON

ure anchoragem) was ins

4, two modmerically anrepresent

of PZT inte

nant peaks)

N ANCHOR

e system wstalled in l

dal shapenalysed asthe local

erface

s of impeda

RAGE

was selectelength of 6

es of the s 19.016 vibration

ance

ed as the 6.4 m by

Page 5: Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed …...Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh

steel anThe destendon-aharmonimeasureintroducone ancforce T140.2 kN5 measu

3.2Fig

under vfrequenctendon-fwas grawere gra35.60 kHthe inte

nchorage hsigned PZTanchorageic voltage ed by an

ce the preschorage to 1 = 48.1 k, T3 = 29.4urements w

(a

Fig. 6 Imp

2 Impedangure 6 sho

various precy bands, force scen

adually redadually decHz (Peak rface-anch

heads (45T interface

e connectiowith 1V-aimpedanc

stress forcmeasure

N was intr4 kN and Twere condu

a) Tendon aFig. 5 Te

pedance re

nce Responows real imestress for

14-20 kHznarios and duced fromcreased fro2). By not

horage sys

5 mm) on e was mouon, as shmplitude,

ce analysece into the

the actualroduced. NT4 = 20.6 kucted repe

anchorage est setup fo

esponses o

nses undempedance rces. Two z (Peak 1the variati

m 48.1 kN om 17.18 kticing that stem was

bearing punted on thown in Fand the im

er, HIOKI cable sys

l cable forNext, the pkN to simueatedly. Th

(b) Inor PZT inte

of PZT inte

er Prestresssignaturesresonant ) and 34-4ion of the (T1) to 20

kHz to 16.6the changcaused b

plates (100the surfaceig. 5(b). T

mpedance 3532. A

stem. And,ce. As the

prestress folate the dae tempera

nterface on erface-anc

erface unde

s Force Chs in 10-100frequencie

40 kHz (Ppeak frequ0.6 kN (T468 kHz (Pe

ge in coupby the cha

0x100x10 me of the beThe PZT signals instressing a load ce

e healthy sorce was d

amage casture was k

bearing plahorage sys

er various

hanges 0 kHz fromes were ideak 2). Tauencies. A4), the twoeak 1) andled impedaange in te

mm3) at twearing plawas excit

n 10-100 kjack was

ell was insstate, the pdecreased

ses. For eakept as 23-

ate stem

prestress f

m the PZT dentical to able 1 out

As the tendo peak freqd from 36.7ance respendon forc

wo ends. te of the ed by a

kHz were used to

stalled at prestress d to T2 = ach case, -24 oC.

forces

interface the two

lines the don force quencies 78 kHz to onses of ces, it is

Page 6: Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed …...Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh

reasonable to confirm the relationship between the prestress force and the system stiffness. That is, the prestress force-loss caused the reduction in the modal stiffness of the coupled interface-anchorage system.

Table 1 Peak frequencies of PZT interface under various tendon-force levels

Case Tendon Force

Level (kN) Peak 1 Peak 2

Freq. (kHz) Var. (%) Freq. (kHz) Var. (%)T1 48.1 17.18 0 36.78 0 T2 40.2 17.04 -0.81 36.62 -0.44 T3 29.4 17.00 -1.05 36.50 -0.76 T4 20.6 16.68 -2.91 35.60 -3.21

4. QUANTITATIVE DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION OF TENDON ANCHORAGE Damage severities induced by the prsestress-loss in the tendon anchorage

should be quantified to estimate the variation of structural performance with regards to its designed state. This goal is achieved by the following steps: (1) a FE model of the PZT interface-tendon anchorage system is simulated; (2) a phase-by-phase model updating process is designed to fine-tune the FE model; and (3) the model updating is performed to correlate the change in impedance signatures to the change in structural properties, both of which are induced by the variation of prestress forces.

4.1 FE Analysis of Tendon Anchorage with PZT Interface Figure 7 shows a FE model of the tested tendon anchorage with the PZT

interface which was established by using COMSOL Multiphysics. The dimension of the FE model was consistent with the actual size of the target structure. The presence of the tendon force can be equivalently treated as the contact stiffness of the bearing plate (Nguyen and Kim 2012, Huynh et al. 2015). The loss of the prestress force can be simulated by the reduction in the contact stiffness. Hence, an equivalent contact spring system kx, ky and kz was simulated for the test structure (see Fig. 7(a)). The loss factor of the contact damping is assumed as 0.02. The FE model was meshed by 1463 solid elements.

The bonding layers between the PZT patch and the interface were not considered for the simplification. The material properties of the aluminum interface were input to the FE model, as described in the previous section. The steel tendon-anchorage has Young's modulus E = 200 GPa, Poisson's ratio = 0.3, mass density = 7850 kg/m3, and damping loss factor = 0.02. The material properties of the PZT patch can be found in Huynh et al. (2015). The initial contact stiffness parameters were selected as: kx = ky = 0 and kz = 106 N/m/m2. A harmonic voltage of 1V-amplitude was simulated to the top of PZT, and the bottom one was set as the ground electrode.

Figure 8 shows real impedance signatures which were generated from the initial FE model. According to the figure, two resonant impedance peaks were identified at f1 = 18.16 kHz (Peak 1) and f2 = 36.96 kHz (Peak 2). As compared to the experimental results shown in Fig. 6, the two calculated impedance peaks were respectively consistent with the two experimental ones, though the peak frequencies and peak

Page 7: Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed …...Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh

magnituwhile tha

Fig. 4.2As

would bthe interthe locaindicatorscaled tthe corre

Figparticulaparametupdated(2004), tas compperformethis mo

des were at of Peak

(a) FE mo

8 Numeric

2 Phase-bs describee unchangrface devical dynamicr for the ctendon-ancesponding gure 9 sharly designter having

d first (Ho ethe variatiopared to thed for the del updat

quite differ2 is the lat

odel Fig. 7 FE

cal impeda

y-phase Med previousged unlessce are altec charactecontact stifchorage ca FE modelhows the ned for the

higher seet al. 2012on of lateraat of axial phase kz

ing proces

rent. The mteral flexur

model of t

ance signat

Model Updasly, the lo

s the structered. By aseristics of ffness conan be iden are well-mphase-by

e tendon aensitivity to2, Huynh eal contact scontact stifirst, and ss needs

motion of Pral mode (s

(b) Interfactendon-anc

tures of ini

ating Algorocal dynamtural paramssuming ththe interfa

ndition. Thntified whematched wy-phase manchorageo the strucet al. 2016)stiffness (iiffness (i.enext was tto be pe

Peak 1 is tsee Fig. 7(

ce’s two mochorage wi

itial FE mo

rithm mic responmeters of the interfacace-anchorat is, the

en the impewith the expmodel upde system (ctural chan). As repo.e., kx and ., kz). Therthe phase

erformed i

he longitud(b)).

odal responsth PZT inte

odel of tend

nses of ththe tendone itself remrage can contact st

edance peperimental ating algo

(Huynh annge would orted by Rky) has rel

refore, the kx. It sh

n combina

dinal flexu

ses erface

don-ancho

he interfacen-anchoragmains undbe utilizedtiffness of eaks obtainresults. orithm wh

nd Kim 20be select

Ritdumronglatively smmodel updould be noation with

ral mode

rage

e device ge and/or amaged, d as the the lab-

ned from

hich was 17). The ed to be kul et al.

mall effect date was oted that

the FE

Page 8: Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed …...Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh

modelling at each iteration step.

Fig. 9 Model updating algorithm for contact stiffness identification

4.3 Identified Contact Stiffness of Tendon-Anchorage The model updating process was carried out for the tendon anchorage using the

impedance signatures measured from the PZT interface. At first, the model updating was performed for the tendon force T1 = 48.1 kN. For the case T1, three phases were performed to match the numerical impedance peaks (Peaks 1 and 2) to the experimental results. Figure 10 shows convergences of two peak frequencies of impedance signatures during model updating for the case T1. In Phase 1, the contact stiffness kz was first updated. Parameter kz was went up from kz = 106 N/m/m2 to kz = 4x1012 N/m/m2 while kx and ky were remained as zero. After Phase 1, the frequency error of Peak 1 was converged from 5.7 % to 0.58 % while that of Peak 2 was converged from 0.58 % to 0.33 %. In Phase 2, the contact stiffness kx and ky were updated. The contact stiffness was gradually increased from kx = ky = 0 to kx = ky = 2.6x1012 N/m/m2 while kz remained unchanged. After Phase 2, the frequency error of Peak 1 was decreased from 0.58 % to 0.12 % while that of Peak 2 remained unchanged as 0.33 %. In Phase 3, kz was again updated, and the contact stiffness was changed from kz = 4x1012 N/m/m2 to kz = 5.15x1012 N/m/m2 while kx and ky were remained unchanged. After Phase 3, the frequency error of Peak 1 was converged from 0.58 % to 0 % while that of Peak 2 was reduced from 0.33 % to 0.16 %.

From the model updating for T1 = 48.1 kN, it is observed that the two peak frequencies of the selected impedance signatures were changed in their frequencies during the model updating (see Fig. 10). The frequency differences of Peak 1 and Peak 2 were decreased as the iteration C24 was reached (see Fig. 10). The stiffness parameters were identified as the converged values when the peak frequencies of the updated FE model became identical to the experimental peak frequencies.

The same updating process was repeated for all tendon force cases T2-T4, from

Measure Experimental Local Dynamics Measure experimental impedance: Zexp

Identify peak frequency fiexp (i = 1, m)

Establish initial FE model Assumption: kx = ky ≤ kz

Select initial contact stiffness: kxo, kyo, kzo

Perform model update phase-by-phase

Check{} 0

Identified the contact stiffness

Compute resonant frequency difference

YesNo

Select a model update phase (kj)

Analyze numerical impedance response: Znum

Identify resonant frequency: finum (i = 1, m)

Select an increment

of contact stiffness

k j= kjo + kjChange phase ?

YesNo

2

exp1

i

numi

i f

f

Page 9: Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed …...Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh

which thas showthe modthat theresults a

Fig. 10 C

Fig. 1

he stiffnesswn in Fig. 1del updatine numericaat the same

Convergen

(a) Te

(c) T11 Impeda

s paramete11. In the g were co

al impedane frequenc

nces of two

ndon force

Tendon forcance signat

ers correspfigure, thempared tonce respocy range an

o impedanc

T1

ce T3 tures of up

ponding toe numericao the measnses werend also ide

ce peaks d

pdated FE

o the four tal impedansured expee well-matentical patt

during mod

(b

(d)models for

tendon forcce signatu

erimental otched witherns.

del updatin

) Tendon fo

) Tendon for four tendo

ces were iures identifones. It is oh the expe

ng for T1 =

orce T2

orce T4 on forces T

identified fied from observed erimental

48.1 kN

T1-T4

Page 10: Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed …...Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh

4.4Re

kz) and examinerelationsrelationspredicte

As

structuraestimatiobetweenusing ththese remeasureprestres

4 Quantitaelationshipthe peak f

ed as shoships sincships, the d for meas

(a) IdentifiFig.

Fig. 13 R

s the finaal contacton of the tn the tendohe exponenelationshiped impedassed tend

ative Identifps betweenfrequencieown in Fce they p

contact ssured peak

ied kx and k 12 Identif

Relationsh

l step, thet stiffnesstendon-ancon forces antial functips, the vaance signaon ancho

fication of n the idents (i.e., Peaig. 12. Porovided thstiffness pk frequenci

ky ied contac

hip between

e relationss is conschorage coand the coons, which

alue of theatures. It orage can

Tendon Antified contaak 1 and Power funche good parametersies of impe

ct stiffness

n contact s

ship betwestructed foonnection, ontact stiffnh providede prestresis observe

n be qua

nchorage Dact stiffnesPeak 2) ofctions werfits for th

s of the tedance sig

(versus pea

stiffness an

een the por the quas shown

ness kx, ky

d the best ss force ced that theantitatively

Damage s parametf impedancre used the data. tendon-ancnatures.

(b) Identifiedak frequen

nd prestres

prestress-louantitative

in Fig. 13y and kz wfits for theould be pe severity

y estimate

ters (i.e., kce signatuto establis From uschorage c

d kz ncies

ss forces

oss force damage

3. The relatwere estable data. Fropredicted f

of damaged by m

kx, ky and res were sh these sing the could be

and the severity

tionships ished by

om using from the ge in the easuring

Page 11: Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed …...Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh

impedance signatures and analyzing equivalent structural parameters corresponding to the damaged state. It is also noted that the relationship between the identified contact stiffness and the prestress force may also be applicable for similar cable anchorage systems. 5. CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the severity of damage in a lab-scaled tendon anchorage caused by the loss of tendon forces was quantitatively identified by using the PZT interface-based impedance monitoring technique. The change in impedance signatures was correlated to the change in tendon forces by the phase-by-phase model updating process. Then the relationship between the prestress force and the contact stiffness was identified for the tendon-anchorage system. By using the relationship, the prestress force could be estimated from the measured impedance signatures. From the findings, it is concluded that the proposed approach has the potential to quantitatively estimate the damage severity in the tendon anchorage which is caused by the tendon force-loss. ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program of National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF 2016R1A2B4015087). The post-doctoral researcher and graduate students were also supported by the Brain Korea 21 Plus program of Korean Government. REFERENCES Chaudhry, Z., Lalande, F., Ganino, A., and Rogers, C. (1996), "Monitoring the integrity

of composite patch structural repair via piezoelectric actuators/sensors", AIAA-1996-1074-CP.

Efunda, Inc. (2010), http://www.efunda.com Ho, D.D., Kim, J.T., Stubbs, N., and Park, W.S. (2012), “Prestress-force estimation in

PSC girder using modal parameters and system identification”, Advances in Structural Engineering, 16(6), 997-1012.

Huynh, T.C., and Kim, J.T. (2014), “Impedance-based cable force monitoring in tendon-anchorage using portable PZT-interface technique”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1-11.

Huynh, T.C., and Kim, J.T. (2016), “Compensation of temperature effect on impedance responses of PZT interface for prestress-loss monitoring in PSC girders”, Smart Structures and Systems, 17(6), 881-901.

Huynh, T.C., and Kim, T.C. (2017), “Quantitative damage identification in tendon anchorage via PZT interface-based impedance monitoring technique”, Smart Structures and System, 20(2).

Page 12: Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed …...Quantitative Damage Identification for Prestressed Tendon Anchorage using PZT Interface Technique and Model Updating Thanh-Canh

Huynh, T.C., Lee, K.S., and Kim, J.T. (2015), “Local dynamic characteristics of PZT impedance interface on tendon-anchorage under prestress force variation”, Smart Structures and Systems, 15(2), 375-393.

Huynh, T.C., Nguyen, T.C., Choi, S.H., and Kim, J.T. (2016), “Impedance monitoring at tendon-anchorage via mountable PZT interface and temperature-effect compensation”, Proceedings of SPIE, 9799, 1-6.

Huynh, T.C., Park, J.H., and Kim, J.T. (2016), “Structural identification of cable-stayed bridge under back-to-back typhoons by wireless vibration monitoring”, Measurement, 88, 385-401.

Huynh, T.C., Park, Y.H., Park, J.H. and Kim, J.T. (2014), “Feasibility verification of mountable PZT-interface for impedance monitoring in tendon-anchorage”, Shock Vibration, 2015, 1-11.

Kim, J.T., and Huynh, T.C. (2016), “Impedance-based monitoring of tendon-anchorage via PZT material-aluminum interface technique”, Journal of the Korean Society for Advanced Composite Structures, 7(4), 91-100.

Kim, J.T., Park, J.H., Hong, D.S., and Park, W.S. (2010), “Hybrid health monitoring of prestressed concrete girder bridges by sequential vibration-impedance approaches”, Engineering Structures, 32, 115-128.

Liang, C., Sun, F.P. and Rogers, C.A. (1994), “Coupled electro-mechanical analysis of adaptive material - Determination of the actuator power consumption and system energy transfer”, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 5, 12-20.

Lopes, V., Park, G., Cudney, H.H., Inman, D.J. (2000), “Impedance-based structural health monitoring with artificial neural networks”, Journal of Intelligent and Material Systems and Structures, 11, 206-214.

Min, J., Park, S., Yun, C.B., Lee, C.G., and Lee, G. (2012), “Impedance-based structural health monitoring incorporating neural network technique for identification of damage type and severity’, Engineering Structures, 39, 210-220.

Nguyen, K. D., and Kim, J.T. (2012), “Smart PZT-interface for wireless impedance-based prestress-loss monitoring in tendon-anchorage connection”, Smart Structures and Systems, 9(6), 489-504.

Nguyen, T.C., Huynh, T.C., Yi, J.H., and Kim, J.T. (2017), “Hybrid bolt-loosening detection in wind turbine tower structures by vibration and impedance responses”, Wind and Structures An International Journal, 24(4), 385-403.

Park, G., Cudney, H. H., and Inman, D. J. (2001), “Feasibility of using impedance-based damage assessment for pipeline structures”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30, 1463-1474.

Park, J.H., Huynh, T.C., and Kim, J.T. (2015), “Temperature effect on wireless impedance monitoring in tendon anchorage of prestressed concrete girder”, Smart Structures and Systems, 15(4), 1159-1175.

Ritdumrongkul, S., Abe, M., Fujino, Y. and Miyashita, T. (2004), “Quantitative health monitoring of bolted joints using a piezoceramic actuator-sensor”, Smart Materials and Structures, 13, 20-29.