Upload
chris-jm-bartels
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.elsevier.com/locate/vetpar
Veterinary Parasitology 148 (2007) 83–92
Quantification of vertical and horizontal transmission of
Neospora caninum infection in Dutch dairy herds
Chris J.M. Bartels a,*, Irene Huinink a, Marten L. Beiboer b,Gerdien van Schaik a, Willem Wouda a, Thomas Dijkstra a,
Arjan Stegeman c
a Animal Health Service Ltd., P.O. Box 9, 7400 AA, Deventer, The Netherlandsb Veterinary Software Design, Koekoeksbloem 1, 98801 LW Zuidhorn, The Netherlands
c Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University,
Yalelaan 7, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands
Received 29 January 2007; received in revised form 20 May 2007; accepted 4 June 2007
Abstract
Ninety-six of 108 randomly selected Dutch dairy herds had one or more cows with a positive serostatus for N. caninum. In these
96 herds, we have quantified the probabilities of vertical transmission (VT) and horizontal transmission (HT) of N. caninum
infection by combining serostatus and pedigree data in 4091 dam-daughter pairs. The probability of animals infected by vertical
transmission during pregnancy (Prob(VT)) was calculated as the proportion of seropositive daughters among daughters of
seropositive dams. The probability of animals infected by horizontal transmission (Prob(HT)) was the proportion of seropositive
daughters among daughters of seronegative dams. These probabilities were calculated after the frequencies of observed dam-
daughter combinations were corrected for (1) imperfect test-characteristics, (2) underestimation of horizontal transmission in
situations that seronegative dams were horizontally infected after the birth of their daughters and (3) overestimation of vertical
transmission in situations that seronegative daughters born from seropositive dams were horizontally infected. The incidence rate
for horizontal transmission was calculated based on Prob(HT) and the average age of the animals in these herds.
Based on the analysis of dam-daughter serology, Prob(VT) was 61.8% (95% CI: 57.5–66.0%) and Prob(HT) was 3.3% (95% CI:
2.7–3.9%). After adjusting the observed frequencies for imperfect test-characteristics, underestimation of horizontal transmission
and overestimation of vertical transmission, Prob(VT) decreased to 44.9% (95% CI: 40.0–49.9%) while Prob(HT) increased to
4.5% (95% CI: 3.9–5.2%). Prob(HT) corresponded with an incidence rate for horizontal transmission of 1.4 (95% CI: 1.2–1.7)
infections per 100 cow-years at risk.
When stratifying herds for the presence of farm dogs, Prob(HT) was higher (5.5% (95% CI: 4.6–6.4%)) in herds with farm dogs
than in herds without farm dogs (2.3% (95% CI: 1.5–3.4%)). When stratifying for within-herd seroprevalence, Prob(HT) was higher
(10.3% (95% CI: 8.6–12.2%)) in herds with high (�10%) within-herd seroprevalence compared with herds with low (<10%)
within-herd seroprevalence (2.0% (95% CI: 1.5–2.6%)). Although there was this relation between Prob(HT) and within-herd
seroprevalence (crude ORPREV = 5.7 (95% CI: 4.0–7.9)), in herds without farm dogs, this relationship was no longer statistical
significant (ORPREVjDOG- = 1.9 (95% CI: 0.7–5.5)). It indicated that the association between seroprevalence and Prob(HT)
depended largely on the presence of farm dogs.
In addition, when looking for the presence of specific age-groups with significantly higher seroprevalence compared with the rest
of the herd, there were 7 herds in which two or more horizontally-infected animals were present in specific age-groups. This was an
indication of a recent point-source exposure to N. caninum.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +31 570660380.
E-mail address: [email protected] (C.J.M. Bartels).
0304-4017/$ – see front matter # 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.06.004
C.J.M. Bartels et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 148 (2007) 83–9284
These results reiterate the current control strategies to apply strict dog-management measures as well as to minimize within-herd
seroprevalence by monitoring serostatus of animals.
# 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Cattle; Epidemiology; Neospora caninum; Horizontal and vertical transmission of infection
1. Introduction
One of the leading causes of bovine abortion is the
protozoan parasite Neospora caninum. N. caninum has a
heteroxenous life cycle in which cattle are important
intermediate hosts and dogs and coyotes are the only
recognized definitive hosts hosts (Gondim et al., 2004;
McAllister et al., 1998). The parasite has a worldwide
prevalence and may cause abortion both after a primary
infection and as a result of recrudescence of a persistent
infection (Dubey et al., 2006). Apart from abortions,
economic losses due to infection with N. caninum are
primarily caused by premature culling (Bartels et al.,
2006b; Tiwari et al., 2005; Thurmond and Hietala,
1996) and possibly decreased milk production (Bartels
et al., 2006b; Romero et al., 2005; Hobson et al., 2002;
Hernandez et al., 2001; Thurmond and Hietala, 1997).
Current strategies to control neosporosis focus on a
reduction of the seroprevalence in cattle and on
separating dogs and dog-faeces from cattle to avoid
new infections in cattle (Dijkstra et al., 2005; Frossling
et al., 2005).
Both vertical and horizontal transmission routes
play a role in the infection of cattle. Vertical
transmission is responsible for the spread of infection
from a persistently-infected dam to her offspring
during pregnancy and contributes significantly to the
persistence of N. caninum infection in a herd by
propagating the infection to successive generations
(Bjorkman et al., 1996; Anderson et al., 1997; Schares
et al., 1998; Wouda et al., 1998). Reported vertical
transmission probabilities range from 41% (Pan et al.,
2004) to 95% (Davison et al., 1999b). Despite the
efficiency of vertical transmission, it is evident that
infection with N. caninum cannot be sustained in cattle
herds without horizontal transmission and this was
modelled by French et al. (1999). Horizontal transmis-
sion occurs when cattle ingest sporulated N. caninum
oocysts. There is convincing evidence that horizontal
transmission can be associated with N. caninum
abortion outbreaks, suggesting a point source exposure
(McAllister et al., 1996; Thurmond et al., 1997;
Mainar-Jaime et al., 1999; Waldner et al., 1999; Dyer
et al., 2000; Dijkstra et al., 2001). A few studies found
evidence for ongoing horizontal transmission of N.
caninum in cattle herds following a point-source
infection (Bjorkman et al., 2003; Dijkstra et al.,
2002b). In several other studies, there was a low
incidence of seroconversion in endemically-infected
herds suggesting a low level of horizontal transmission
(Davison et al., 1999b; Frossling et al., 2005; Hietala
and Thurmond, 1999; Schares et al., 1998; Wouda and
Brinkhof, 1998). These above-mentioned studies were
all based on herds with a history of clinical neosporosis.
To our knowledge, no studies have measured vertical
and horizontal transmission probabilities based on a
random sample of herds.
Within-herd seroprevalence and presence of farm
dogs are putative risk factors for N. caninum-associated
abortions (Bartels et al., 1999; Pare et al., 1998; Schares
et al., 2004; Wouda et al., 1999) and thus N. caninum
infection. As definitive hosts for N. caninum, dogs are
known to spread oocysts leading to horizontal
transmission in cattle. The relation between within-
herd seroprevalence and horizontal transmission is less
clear. Biologically, it can be hypothesized that increased
within-herd seroprevalence might lead to increased
horizontal transmission if cow to cow transmission
would be possible. For this reason, we were interested to
know if seroprevalence in itself is related to the
probability of horizontal transmission.
The objective of this study was to quantify the
probabilities of vertical and horizontal transmission of
N. caninum infection in Dutch dairy herds in general.
Additionally, we compared the probability of horizontal
transmission between herds with and without farm
dogs, and between herds with high versus low within-
herd seroprevalence. This was done by combining
serological data with pedigree data of seropositive
animals from an earlier seroprevalence study.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Selection of herds
As part of a prevalence study (Bartels et al., 2006a),
108 dairy herds were randomly selected from the Dutch
dairy-herd population and blood was collected from all
female cattle above 3 months of age (11,672 animals).
In 96 herds (10,350 animals), 1 or more animals tested
C.J.M. Bartels et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 148 (2007) 83–92 85
Table 1
Contingency table used for calculating the probability of horizontal
and vertical transmission of N. caninum infection
Status of daughters Status of dam
Seropositive Seronegative
Seropositive a b
Seronegative c d
a + c b + d
seropositive and these herds were included in the
present study.
2.2. Serological testing of animals
Serum samples were tested using the Animal Health
Service (AHS) in-house serum ELISA (Wouda and
Brinkhof, 1998). An S/P-ratio of >0.5 was defined as
positive. The diagnostic sensitivity was 96.9% (95% CI:
94.5–99.4%) and the diagnostic specificity was 97.3%
(95% CI: 95.5–99.0%) (Von Blumroder et al., 2004).
2.3. Calculation of vertical and horizontal
transmission probabilities
Pedigree information of cattle was obtained from the
Dutch Identification and Registration (I&R, Royal
Dutch Dairy Syndicate, Arnhem, The Netherlands). A
software program Neospora# (Beiboer, Veterinary
Software design, Zuidhorn, The Netherlands, 2002)
was used to facilitate tracing dam-daughter relations
and linking serological-test results.
Data on dam-daughter relations were compiled in
2 � 2 tables (Table 1). The fraction of animals infected
by vertical transmission during pregnancy was calcu-
lated as the proportion of seropositive daughters among
the daughters of seropositive dams (a/a +c). The
Table 2
Algorithms used to convert observed frequencies of dam-daughter combinat
was done using the positive (PV+) and negative predictive (PV�) terms
Observed Corrected
Dam + daughter+ Dam + daugh
Dam + daughter+ (cell aa) a � PV+ � PV+ a � PV+ � (1
Dam + daughter� (cell b) b � PV+ � (1 � PV�) b � PV+ � P
Dam � daughter+ (cell c) c � (1 � PV�) � PV+ c � (1 � PV�(1 � PV+)
Dam � daughter� (cell d) d � (1 � PV�) �(1 � PV�)
d � (1 � PV+
a References to cell a–d relate to Table 1.
fraction of animals infected by horizontal transmission
was the proportion of seropositive daughters among the
daughters of seronegative dams (b/b + d).
As this was a cross-sectional study, the observed
frequencies of dam-daughters combinations were
adjusted for imperfect test characteristics, for possible
underestimation of horizontal transmission (i.e. some
positive-tested dams may have been infected after they
gave birth to a daughter) and overestimation of vertical
transmission (i.e. some positive-tested daughters from
positive dams may have been infected after being born
as negative daughter).
2.3.1. Adjustment for imperfect test characteristics
It is likely that due to imperfect test-characteristics a
proportion of animals were wrongly classified as
seropositive or seronegative, and as a consequence the
routes of transmission were assigned incorrectly. The
extent to which this occurred was calculated based on the
prevalence of infection in the study population and the
point-estimates of sensitivity and specificity of the AHS-
inhouse test. The predictivevalue for a positive test (PV+)
result was 78.4% (95% CI: 75.9–80.7) and for a negative
test result (PV�) 99.7% (95% CI: 99.5–99.8).
Assignment of vertical-infection status (Dam +
daughter+, cell a in Table 1) is the result of 4 different
probabilities. The fraction of animals correctly assigned a
vertical-transmission status was calculated as the
product of the probability of a truly-seropositive
daughter (PV+ = 0.784) times a truly-seropositive dam
(PV + = 0.784) which amounts to 0.615. The fraction of
animals incorrectly assigned to the combination
Dam + daughter + (1 � 0.615a) was divided over three
other possible dam-daughter combinations (0.169 for
Dam + daughter�, 0.169 for Dam � daughter+ and
0.047 for Dam � daughter�) according to the algorithms
given in Table 2.
ions into frequencies corrected for imperfect test characteristics. This
ter� Dam � daughter+ Dam � daughter�
� PV+) a � (1 � PV+) � PV+ a � (1 � PV+) �(1 � PV+)
V� b � (1 � PV�) �(1 � PV+)
b � (1 � PV�) � PV�
) � c � PV� � PV+ c � PV� � (1 � PV+)
) � PV� d � PV� � (1 � PV�) d � PV� � PV�
C.J.M. Bartels et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 148 (2007) 83–9286
Table 3
Conversion from observed to corrected frequencies of 4091 dam-daughter combinations. This was based on the algorithms in Table 2 and the point-
estimates for predictive values for positive (PV+ = 0.752) and negative (PV� = 0.997) test results
Observed Observed frequencies Corrected
Dam + daughter+ Dam + daughter� Dam � daughter+ Dam � daughter�
Dam + daughter+ (cell a) 325 200 55 55 15.2
Dam + daughter� (cell b) 201 0.5 157 0.1 43.3
Dam � daughter+ (cell c) 117 0.3 0.08 91.5 25.2
Dam � daughter� (cell d) 3448 0.03 10.3 10.3 3427
Corrected frequencies 201 223 157 3510
The corrected numbers of dam-daughter pairs were
summed (Table 3) and subsequently used for the
additional adjustments (Table 4, line b).
2.3.2. Adjustment for horizontal infection in dams
Horizontal transmission tended to be underestimated
when using cross-sectional data. This happened when a
seronegative dam had been infected after its daughter
was born. Romero and Frankena (2003) provided a
method to adjust for this. They assumed that the
probability of horizontal transmission in dams occurred
at the same probability as in daughters. Of seronegative
dams, the probability of daughters that was infected
horizontally was calculated as (b/b + d) (referring to
Table 1) and then the frequencies of a, c and (a + c)
(Table 1) were reduced according to this proportion
while the subtracted numbers were added to b, d and
(b + d), respectively (Table 4, line c).
Table 4
Frequencies of dam-daughter pairs and probabilities of vertical (Prob(VT) an
Dutch dairy herds with 1 or more seropositive animal to N. caninum. Startin
adjustments are illustrated: (1) adjusting for imperfect test characteristics (b)
(c) and (3) adjustment for postnatal infection in seronegative daughters from s
is given as the proportion of seropositive daughters among daughters from ser
as the proportion of seropositive daughters among daughters from seroneg
Status of
daughters
Sta
Se
a Observed dam-daughter combinations Seropositive 32
Seronegative 20
b Dam-daughter combinations adjusted for
imperfect test characteristics
Seropositive 20
Seronegative 22
c Dam-daughter combinations adjusted for
postnatal infection of dams after
birth of daughter
Seropositive 19
Seronegative 21
d Dam-daughter combinations adjusted for
postnatal infection of daughters born
from seropositive dams after birth
Seropositive 18
Seronegative 22
2.3.3. Adjustment for horizontal infection in
daughters from a seropositive dam
Overestimation of vertical transmission may have
occurred when a seronegative daughter born from a
seropositive dam had been infected horizontally.
Adjustment for this kind of overestimation was done
using the following algorithm:
a0 ¼ ðaþ cÞ ProbðVTÞ þ ðaþ cÞ
� ð1� ProbðVTÞÞ ProbðHTÞ (1)
where a0 is equal to a after the abovementioned adjust-
ment for horizontal infection in dams. It is the sum of the
number of vertically-infected daughters born from ser-
opositive dams ((a + c)Prob(VT)) plus the number of
seropositive dams with daughters (originally not infected
by vertical transmission) that were infected by horizontal
transmission ((a + c)(1 � Prob(VT)(Prob(HT)). Conse-
d horizontal (Prob(HT) transmission of 4091 dam-daughter pairs in 96
g with the observed dam-daughter frequencies (a), the effects of three
; (2) adjustment for postnatal infection in dams after birth of daughters
eropositive dams (d). The vertical transmission probability (Prob(VT))
opositive dams and the horizontal transmission probability (Prob(HT))
ative dams
tus of dams Prob(VT)%
(95% CI)
Prob(HT)%
(95% CI)ropositive Seronegative
5 117 61.8 (57.5–66.0) 3.3 (2.7–3.9)
1 3448
1 157 47.4 (42.7–52.4) 4.3 (3.6–5.0)
3 3511
2 166 47.4 (42.6–52.3) 4.5 (3.9–5.2)
3 3521
2 166 44.9 (40.0–49.9) 4.5 (3.9–5.2)
3 3521
C.J.M. Bartels et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 148 (2007) 83–92 87
quently, we assumed that after failure of vertical trans-
mission the probability of horizontal transmission in
daughters of seropositive dams was the same as that
probability in daughters of seronegative dams.
In this algorithm (a + c) and Prob(HT) are known
(see adjustment of postnatal infections in dams
after giving birth). Moreover, since Prob(VT) equals
a/(a + c), a can be solved by rewriting Eq. (1) as:
a ¼ a0 � ðaþ cÞ ProbðHTÞ1� ProbðHTÞ (2)
The result of this adjustment on the frequencies of
dam-daughter combinations is given in Table 4, line d.
2.4. Rate of horizontal infection
The incidence rate of horizontal infection (IR(HT))
was calculated based on the adjusted Prob(HT) and the
average age of animals. Based on the formula (Dohoo
et al., 2003):
ProbðHTÞ ¼ 1� exp�ðIRðHTÞTÞ (3)
where T is the average age of an animal, IR(HT) can be
calculated by converting algorithm (3) into:
IRðHTÞ ¼ �ln
�1� ProbðHTÞ
T
�(4)
assuming that the rate of infection is constant during an
animal’s lifetime.
2.5. Stratification
The study population was divided into herds with
(N = 66) and without (N = 30) farm dogs, and herds
with high prevalence (�10% within-herd prevalence,
N = 35) and with low prevalence (<10% within-herd
prevalence, N = 61). Crude odds ratios for farm-dog
presence (ORDOG) and seroprevalence (ORPREV) were
calculated to quantify the effect of these explanatory
variables. In addition, to assess the effect of farm-dog
presence on the relation between seroprevalence and
horizontal transmission, stratum-specific odds ratios
(ORPREVjDOG) and the Mantel-Haensel summary odds
ratio (ORMH_PREV) were calculated.
2.6. High seroprevalence age groups
For each herd, the number of horizontally-infected
animals was counted. Clusters of horizontally-infected
animals were determined according to the method of
Dijkstra et al. (2001). These researchers demonstrated
that the seroprevalence in specific age-groups was
significantly higher compared with the other animals in
the herd, indicating a point-source exposure to N.
caninum. They also demonstrated that such exposures
were found during a limited period of common housing
and feeding of animals (Dijkstra et al., 2002b). We
made use of this method by looking at a clustered
presence of seropositive animals within time periods of
�9 months. The time-window of �9-months was used
because (pregnant) young stock is traditionally grouped
together in specific age-groups in which the age
difference varies between 6 and 9 months.
2.7. Statistical analyses
Calculations for Prob(VT) and Prob(HT) were done
in Excel (Microsoft1 Excel, 2002). Ninety-five percent
confidence intervals for Prob(VT) and Prob(HT) were
calculated using the exact binomial distribution
(STATA/SE 8.2, 2004). Calculation of OR, stratified
OR and MH summary OR was done as described by
Dohoo et al. (2003) using Win Episcope 2.0 (Thrusfield
et al., 2001). We considered P � 0.05 to indicate
statistical significance.
3. Results
The average age of animals was 3.2 (S.D. 2.3) years.
Overall seroprevalence in the 96 seropositive study
herds was 11.3% (1173/10,350), and within-herd
seroprevalence ranged from 0.5 to 49.1%.
Of 4091 dam-daughter pairs, the serostatus of both
dam and daughter was known (Table 4) (29% of all
possible dam-daughters pairs in the sampled popula-
tion). Based on the unadjusted analysis of dam-daughter
serology, Prob(VT) was 61.8% (95% CI: 57.5–66.0%)
and Prob(HT) was 3.3% (95% CI: 2.7–3.9%). When
adjusting the observed frequencies for the predictive
values of positive and negative test results, under-
estimation of horizontal and overestimation of vertical
transmission, Prob(VT) decreased significantly to
44.9% (95% CI: 40.0–49.9%) while the Prob(HT)
increased to 4.5% (95% CI: 3.9–5.2%) (Table 4). Based
on this result and the average age of 3.2 years, the
incidence rate for horizontal transmission was calcu-
lated as 1.4 (95% CI: 1.2–1.7) infections per 100 cow-
years at risk.
In herds with farm dogs, Prob(HT) was higher (5.5%
(95% CI: 4.6–6.4%)) compared with herds without farm
dogs (2.3% (95% CI: 1.5–3.4%)) and the crude ORDOG
was 2.5 (95% CI: 1.7–3.9). Consequently, IR(HT) was
higher in herd with farm dogs (1.8 (95% CI: 1.5–2.2)
C.J.M. Bartels et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 148 (2007) 83–9288
Table 5
Frequencies of dam-daughter pairs, probabilities (Prob(HT) and incidence rates for horizontal transmission of 4091 dam-daughter pairs in 96 Dutch
dairy herds with 1 or more animals seropositive for N. caninum. Frequencies of dam-daughter pairs are given after adjustment for imperfect test
characteristics and horizontal infection of dams and daughters
Status of
daughters
Status of dams Prob(HT)%
(95% CI)
Incidence rate per 100
cow-years at risk (95% CI)Seropositive Seronegative
Herds with dog(s) present
(N = 2924 pairs in 66 herds)
Seropositive 160 141 5.7 (4.8–6.7) 1.8 (1.5–2.2)
Seronegative 185 2439
Herds with no dog(s) present
(N = 1167 pairs in 30 herds)
Seropositive 20 26 2.3 (1.5–3.4) 0.7 (0.5–1.1)
Seronegative 38 1083
High within-herd seroprevalence
(N = 1486 pairs in 35 herds)
Seropositive 136 124 10.3 (8.6–12.2) 3.4 (2.8–4.1)
Seronegative 146 1080
Low within-herd seroprevalence
(N = 2605 pairs in 61 herds)
Seropositive 32 49 2.0 (1.5–2.6) 0.6 (0.5–0.8)
Seronegative 78 2445
infections per 100 cow-years at risk) compared with
herds without farm dogs (0.7 (95% CI: 0.5–0.11)
infections per 100 cow-years at risk).
A similar effect was seen for seroprevalence. In herds
with high within-herd seroprevalence, Prob(HT) was
higher (10.3% (95% CI: 8.6–12.2%) compared with
herds with low seroprevalence (2.0% (95% CI: 1.5–
2.6%)). This resulted in a higher IR(HT) in high
prevalence herds (3.4 (95% CI: 2.8–4.1) infections per
100 cow-years at risk) compared with low prevalence
herds (0.6 (95% CI: 0.5–0.8) infections per 100 cow-
years at risk) (Table 5). The crude ORPREV was 5.7 (95%
CI: 4.0–7.9). However, the stratified ORPREVjDOG+ was
6.6 (95% CI: 4.2–9.8) while ORPREVjDOG- was 1.9 (95%
CI: 0.7–5.5). The Mantel-Haensel summary ORMH_PREV
Table 6
Descriptive information on seven herds with specific seropositive age-group
sample of 108 Dutch dairy herds (sampled in 2003)
Farm #Animals
sampled
#Seropos.
animals/#animals
excl. cluster
#Seropos.
animals/#animals
in cluster
1 89 3/83 2/6
2 67 22/60 7/7
3 55 19/46 8/9
4 170 10/126 3/10
4/12
5/14
3/8
5 146 20/130 14/16
6 127 21/107 10/20
7 128 27/110 16/18
was 5.6 (95% CI: 3.9–8.2) with a significant Chi-square
value for the Breslow-Day statistic (P-value = 0.03). This
indicated that the strength of the relation between
seroprevalence and horizontal transmission depends
largely on the presence of farm dogs(s).
Fifty-seven (59%) out of 96 seropositive herds had at
least 1 horizontally-infected animal and 27 herds had
�2 horizontally-infected animals. In seven herds,
specific age-groups with significantly higher seropre-
valence compared with the rest of the herd were present
(Table 6). In Fig. 1, the situation in herd 7 with 128
animals and 33.3% seroprevalence of N. caninum
infection is illustrated. A cluster of horizontally infected
animals was born between April and December 2000.
Sixteen out of the 18 animals born during this period
s indicative for point-source infection with N. caninum from a random
P-value #Horizontally
infected animals
in cluster
Period of birth-dates for cluster
0.03 2 November 2000
<0.01 2 November 1999–February 2000
<0.01 3 August 2000–January 2001
0.02 2 November–December 1999
<0.01 2 July 2000–January 2001
<0.01 2 July–November 2001
0.03 2 April–June 2002
<0.01 6 April 1998–January 1999
<0.01 7 May–December 2000
<0.01 7 April–December 2000
C.J.M. Bartels et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 148 (2007) 83–92 89
Fig. 1. Overview of serological testing for N. caninum in herd 7 (N = 128 animals) and assigned infection route of seropositive animals.
tested seropositive. Six of these had an unknown
infection route, three were assigned a vertical and seven
a horizontal infection route. Two dogs had been
purchased on this farm, the first at the end of 1995
and the second at the beginning of 2001.
4. Discussion
In the present study, we quantified the probability of
vertical and horizontal transmission of N. caninum
infection in Dutch dairy herds. We applied adjustments
to the observed frequencies of dam-daughter combina-
tions to account for imperfect test characteristics,
underestimation of horizontal and overestimation of
vertical transmission. Additionally, we defined a time at
risk, allowing for the conversion of probabilities into
rates. For vertical transmission the time at risk was one
pregnancy, while for horizontal transmission, we
converted Prob(HT) into IR(HT) by using the average
age of animals as the time at risk. In epidemiological
terms, the incidence rate is an important parameter and
it allows direct comparison between studies. For this
reason, it is preferably used in simulation models to
evaluate different disease control strategies.
The unadjusted probability of vertical transmission
(Prob(VT)) in the observed dam-daughter relations was
61.8%. This percentage decreased significantly to
44.9% when dam-daughter frequencies were corrected.
This drop in Prob(VT) was mainly caused by the effect
of test specificity in a population with moderate
seroprevalence, leading to relatively low predictive
value for positive test results. The adjustment related to
overestimation of vertical transmission had much less
effect on the final outcome of Prob(VT). When applying
adjustments on Prob(HT), this probability increased
from 3.3 to 4.5%. Again, the adjustment for imperfect
test characteristics had a greater effect on Prob(HT)
than adjusting for underestimation of horizontal
transmission. This probability corresponded with an
incidence rate for horizontal transmission of 1.4 per 100
cow-years at risk in a random group of seropositive
Dutch dairy herds.
Previously, a limited number of prospective studies
on dairies with N. caninum-associated abortion pro-
blems have been conducted, providing incidence rates
of horizontal transmission. These varied between less
than 1% per year (Hietala and Thurmond, 1999) to an
overall estimate of 1.9 horizontal infections per 100
heifer-years at risk (Davison et al., 1999b) and 8.5
horizontal infections per 100 cow-years at risk (Pare
et al., 1997). Comparison with our incidence rate needs
caution because these three studies were based on
herd(s) situations with N. caninum-associated abortion
problems.
There have also been studies looking into vertical
and horizontal transmission probabilities based on
cross-sectional data (Dijkstra et al., 2001; Pan et al.,
2004; Romero and Frankena, 2003). However, none or
limited adjustments such as described in our study were
carried out. Therefore, the presented probabilities for
vertical transmission will most likely be overestimated
and for horizontal transmission will be underestimated.
C.J.M. Bartels et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 148 (2007) 83–9290
Looking at the data of one of these studies based on
Dutch dairy herds with N. caninum-associated abortion
problems (Dijkstra et al., 2001), the presented Prob(VT)
and Prob(HT) were 68.8% and 22.8%, respectively.
When carrying out the adjustments described in our
study, Prob(VT) and Prob(HT) were 42.0% and 30.0%,
respectively. When assuming the same average age of
animals as in our study, the incidence rate for horizontal
transmission in these abortion-problem herds was 11.1
infections per 100 cow-years at risk, or eight times
higher as in the random herds studied in our study. Thus,
comparison between studies shows that differences in
vertical and horizontal transmission probabilities are
related to what is known about the herd situation. In
addition, it is plausible that vertical and horizontal
transmission probabilities vary between countries
because of variation in the presence of definitive hosts,
conditions for oocyst sporulation and virulence in
parasite strains.
Both farm-dog presence and high within-herd
seroprevalence had a strong statistical relation with
Prob(HT): the ORDOG for presence of farm dogs and
ORPREV for high within-herd seroprevalence were 2.5
and 5.7, respectively. A similar effect of the relation
between within-herd seroprevalence and horizontal
transmission was found by Romero and Frankena
(2003). This relationship was explained by an increased
exposure to environmental sources of infection,
including infected placentas, amniotic fluid or water
and food contaminated with N. caninum oocysts from
dogs. We were able to underscore the importance of
farm dogs on the occurrence of horizontal transmission
by stratification for farm-dog presence. The association
between within-herd seroprevalence and Prob(HT)
increased when farms had dogs while, on farms without
dogs, this relation became weaker (ORPREVjDOG = 1.9)
and was no longer statistically significant. This
illustrates that the effect of within-herd seroprevalence
on Prob(HT) depended for a large part on the presence
of farm dogs. In biological terms, it reinforced the
important role farm dogs play in spreading the
infection. In an environment of high within-herd
seroprevalence, dogs have a greater chance to become
infected and the probability of horizontal transmission
increases accordingly. When no farm dogs were present,
the probability of horizontal transmission tended to
increase with an increasing seroprevalence. This
indicated that cattle may acquire new infections by
sources other than farm dogs. In the Dutch situation,
where dogs are the only known definitive hosts, stray
dogs most likely act as additional sources of oocysts.
This was earlier hypothesized by Schares et al. (2004) in
a study comparable to the Dutch situation. Another
more speculative hypothesis is the uptake of infectious
stages other than sporulated oocysts such as tachyzoites.
In a study by Uggla et al. (1998), neonatal calves were
infected orally by colostrum spiked with Nc-SweB1
tachyzoites. In an experiment in which heifers were
challenged orally with tachyzoites, one out of eight
animals seroconverted (Weston et al., 2005). Possible
horizontal transmission in cattle with oral lesions was
suggested when these cattle ingest food or water
contaminated with tachyzoites such as from placenta or
vaginal discharge from cattle calving or aborting due to
N. caninum.
In 7 out of 96 herds evidence was found for a point-
source infection based on the existence of a specific age-
group of animals in which the seroprevalence for N.
caninum was higher compared with the rest of the herd.
Simultaneously, it indicated that point-source infections
did not necessarily lead to increased clinical neosporo-
sis but could occur without abortion problems.
Previously Dijkstra et al. (2002a) have described a
similar finding in one herd in which more than half of
the animals seroconverted without any signs of
abortion.
Whatever the unknown mechanisms of horizontal
transmission, our findings emphasize the appropriate-
ness of current control strategies to reduce seropreva-
lence by testing animals and subsequently deciding to
cull seropositive animals and/or their offspring. In
addition, strict dog-management measures are neces-
sary. It is particularly important to prevent dogs (both
dogs living on the premises and stray dogs) from being
present at calving and to prevent contamination of feed
and drinking water with dog faeces (Dijkstra et al.,
2005).
When using unadjusted cross-sectional data, prob-
abilities of vertical transmission tend to be over-
estimated and probabilities of horizontal transmission
tend to be underestimated. A cohort study in which both
dam and daughter were bled at regular intervals would
be a preferred study design. In such a study design, more
accurate probabilities for vertical and horizontal
transmission could be calculated because it would
allow for correction biases such as variation in antibody
titers by age and throughout pregnancy (Davison et al.,
1999a; Maley et al., 2001; Stenlund et al., 1999). In
addition, a cohort study would allow for accurate
calculation of ‘animal time at risk’ as denominator for
the horizontal-transmission rate. However, as cohort
studies require long study periods and subsequently
more financial means, these are applied scarcely and
often involving a limited number of herds. By adjusting
C.J.M. Bartels et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 148 (2007) 83–92 91
cross-sectional data according the methods described
here, we believe that cross-sectional studies can provide
reliable estimates for vertical and horizontal transmis-
sion probabilities.
In conclusion, the adjusted probabilities of vertical
and horizontal transmission in Dutch cattle were 44.9%
and 4.5%, respectively. The incidence rate for
horizontal transmission was 1.4 infections per 100
cow-years at risk. The adjustment for imperfect test
characteristics had a major impact on the estimated
probabilities. The observed relation between within-
herd seroprevalence and Prob(HT) was largely depen-
dent on the presence of farm dogs. Additionally, in 7%
of dairy herds we found a specific age-group with high
seroprevalence indicating a point-source infection.
Such point-source infections apparently may occur
without obvious clinical signs. This means that the
within-herd seroprevalence can increase unnoticed to
levels that pose a risk for an abortion epidemic.
Therefore, current control strategies based on contain-
ing seroprevalence and managing dogs on farm remain
important.
Acknowledgements
Serological data of the participating dairy herds were
obtained from previous studies, which were funded by
the Dairy Commodity Board (Rijswijk, The Nether-
lands) and the European Union (Research Project
QLK2-CT2001-0150 ‘‘Diagnosis and epidemiology of
Neospora caninum associated bovine abortions’’). The
authors thank Dr. Maarten Eysker and Ir. Wim Swart for
their valuable contribution to this manuscript and
participating farmers for allowing the use of herd data,
the NRS (the Dutch Cattle Improvement Organisation,
Arnhem, The Netherlands) for data supply.
References
Anderson, M.L., Reynolds, J.P., Rowe, J.D., Sverlow, K.W., Packham,
A.E., Barr, B.C., Conrad, P.A., 1997. Evidence of vertical trans-
mission of Neospora sp. infection in dairy cattle. J. Am. Vet. Med.
Assoc. 210, 1169–1172.
Bartels, C.J.M., Arnaiz-Seco, I., Ruiz-Santa-Quitera, J.A., Bjorkman,
C., Frossling, J., Von Blumroder, D., Conraths, F.J., Schares, G.,
van Maanen, C., Wouda, W., Ortega-Mora, L.M., 2006a. Suprana-
tional comparison of Neospora caninum seroprevalences in cattle
in Germany, The Netherlands, Spain and Sweden. Vet. Parasitol.
137, 17–27.
Bartels, C.J.M., van Schaik, G., Veldhuisen, J.P., van den Borne, B.H.P.,
Wouda, W., Dijkstra, Th., 2006b. Effect of Neospora caninum
serostatus on culling, reproductive performance and milk produc-
tion in Dutch dairy herds with and without a history of Neospora
caninum-associated epidemics. Prev. Vet. Med. 77, 186–198.
Bartels, C.J.M., Wouda, W., Schukken, Y.H., 1999. Risk factors for
Neospora caninum-associated abortion storms in dairy herds in the
Netherlands (1995 to 1997). Theriogenology 52, 247–257.
Bjorkman, C., McAllister, M.M., Frossling, J., Naslund, K., Leung, F.,
Uggla, A., 2003. Application of the Neospora caninum IgG avidity
ELISA in assessment of chronic reproductive losses after an
outbreak of neosporosis in a herd of beef cattle. J. Vet. Diagn.
Invest. 15, 3–7.
Bjorkman, C., Johansson, O., Stenlund, S., Holmdahl, O.J.M., Uggla,
A., 1996. Neospora species infection in a herd of dairy cattle. J.
Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 208, 1441–1444.
Davison, H.C., French, N.P., Trees, A.J., 1999a. Herd-specific and
age-specific seroprevalence of Neospora caninum in 14 British
dairy herds. Vet. Rec. 144, 547–550.
Davison, H.C., Otter, A., Trees, A.J., 1999b. Estimation of vertical and
horizontal transmission parameters of Neospora caninum infec-
tions in dairy cattle. Int. J. Parasitol. 29, 1683–1689.
Dijkstra, Th., Bartels, C.J.M., Wouda, W., 2005. Control of bovine
neosporosis: experiences from the Netherlands. In: Abstract from
the 20th International Conference of the World Association for the
Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP), Christchurch,
New Zealand, p. 191.
Dijkstra, T., Barkema, H.W., Bjorkman, C., Wouda, W., 2002a. A high
rate of seroconversion for Neospora caninum in a dairy herd
without an obvious increased incidence of abortions. Vet. Para-
sitol. 109, 203–211.
Dijkstra, Th., Barkema, H.W., Hesselink, J.W., Wouda, W., 2002b.
Point source exposure of cattle to Neospora caninum consistent
with periods of common housing and feeding and related to the
introduction of a dog. Vet. Parasitol. 105, 89–98.
Dijkstra, Th., Barkema, H.W., Eysker, M., Wouda, W., 2001. Evidence
of post-natal transmission of Neospora caninum in Dutch dairy
herds. Int. J. Parasitol. 31, 209–215.
Dohoo, I., Martin, W., Stryhn, H., 2003. Veterinary Epidemiologic
Research, Chapter 4: Measures of Disease Frequency. AVC Inc.,
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
Dubey, J.P., Buxton, D., Wouda, W., 2006. Pathogenesis of bovine
neosporosis. J. Comp. Path. 134, 267–289.
Dyer, R.M., Jenkins, M.C., Kwok, O.C.H., Douglas, L.W., Dubey, J.P.,
2000. Serologic survey of Neospora caninum infection in a closed
dairy cattle herd in Maryland: risk of serologic reactivity by
production groups. Vet. Parasitol. 90, 171–181.
French, N.P., Clancy, D., Davison, H.C., Trees, A.J., 1999. Mathe-
matical models of Neospora caninum infection in dairy cattle:
transmission and options for control. Int. J. Parasitol. 29, 1691–
1704.
Frossling, J., Uggla, A., Bjorkman, C., 2005. Prevalence and trans-
mission of Neospora caninum within infected Swedish dairy
herds. Vet. Parasitol. 128, 209–218.
Gondim, L.F.P., McAllister, M.M., Pitt, W.C., Zemlicka, D.E., 2004.
Coyotes (Canis latrans) are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum.
Int. J. Parasitol. 34, 159–161.
Hernandez, J., Risco, C., Donovan, A., 2001. Association between
exposure to Neospora caninum and milk production in dairy cows.
J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 219, 632–635.
Hietala, S.K., Thurmond, M.C., 1999. Postnatal Neospora caninum
transmission and transient serologic responses in two dairies. Int.
J. Parasitol. 29, 1669–1676.
Hobson, J.C., Duffield, T.F., Kelton, D., Lissemore, K., Hietala, S.K.,
Leslie, K.E., McEwen, B., Cramer, G., Peregrine, A.S., 2002.
Neospora caninum serostatus and milk production of Holstein
cattle. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 221, 1160–1164.
C.J.M. Bartels et al. / Veterinary Parasitology 148 (2007) 83–9292
Mainar-Jaime, R.C., Thurmond, M.C., Berzal-Herranz, B., Hietala,
S.K., 1999. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum and abortion in
dairy cows in northern Spain. Vet. Rec. 145, 72–75.
Maley, S.W., Buxton, D., Thomson, K.M., Schriefer, C.E.S., Innes,
E.A., 2001. Serological analysis of calves experimentally infected
with Neospora caninum: a 1-year study. Vet. Parasitol. 96, 1–9.
McAllister, M.M., Dubey, J.P., Lindsay, D.S., Jolley, W.R., Wills,
R.A., McGuire, A.M., 1998. Dogs are definitive hosts of Neospora
caninum. Int. J. Parasitol. 28, 1473–1478.
McAllister, M., Huffman, E.M., Hietala, S.K., Conrad, P.A., Ander-
son, M.L., Salman, M.D., 1996. Evidence suggesting a point
source exposure in an outbreak of bovine abortion due to neos-
porosis. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 8, 355–357.
Pan, Y.G., Jansen, B., Duffield, T.F., Hietala, S., Kelton, D., Lin,
C.Y., Peregrine, A.S., 2004. Genetic susceptibility to Neospora
caninum infection in Holstein cattle in Ontario. J. Dairy Sci. 87,
3967–3975.
Pare, J., Fecteau, F.G., Fortin, M., Marsolais, G., 1998. Seroepide-
miologic study of Neospora caninum in dairy herds. J. Am. Vet.
Med. Assoc. 213, 1595–1598.
Pare, J., Thurmond, M.C., Hietala, S.K., 1997. Neospora caninum
antibodies in cows during pregnancy as a predictor of congenital
infection and abortion. J. Parasitol. 83, 82–87.
Romero, J.J., Van Breda, S., Vargas, B., Dolz, G., Frankena, K., 2005.
Effect of neosporosis on productive and reproductive performance
of dairy cattle in Costa Rica. Theriogenology 64, 1928–1939.
Romero, J.J., Frankena, K., 2003. The effect of the dam-calf relation-
ship on serostatus to Neospora caninum on 20 Costa Rican dairy
farms. Vet. Parasitol. 114, 159–171.
Schares, G., Barwald, A., Staubach, C., Ziller, M., Kloss, D., Schroder,
R., Labohm, R., Drager, K., Fasen, W., Hess, R.G., Conraths, F.J.,
2004. Potential risk factors for bovine Neospora caninum infection
in Germany are not under the control of the farmers. Parasitology
129, 301–309.
Schares, G., Peters, M., Wurm, R., Barwald, A., Conraths, F.J., 1998.
The efficiency of vertical transmission of Neospora caninum in
dairy cattle analysed by serological techniques. Vet. Parasitol. 80,
87–98.
Stenlund, S., Kindahl, H., Magnusson, U., Uggla, U., Bjorkman, C.,
1999. Serum antibody profile and reproductive performance dur-
ing two consecutive pregnancies of cows naturally infected with
Neospora caninum. Vet. Parasitol. 85, 227–234.
Thrusfield, M., Ortega, C., de Blas, I., Noordhuizen, J.P., Frankena, K.,
2001. Win Episcope 2.0: improved epidemiological software for
veterinary medicine. Vet. Rec. 148, 567–572.
Thurmond, M.C., Hietala, S.K., Blanchard, P.C., 1997. Herd-based
diagnosis of Neospora caninum-induced endemic and epidemic
abortion in cows and evidence for congenital and postnatal
transmission. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 9, 44–49.
Thurmond, M.C., Hietala, S.K., 1997. Effect of Neospora caninum
infection on milk production in first-lactation dairy cows. J. Am.
Vet. Med. Assoc. 210, 672–674.
Thurmond, M.C., Hietala, S.K., 1996. Culling associated with Neos-
pora caninum infection in dairy cows. Am. J. Vet. Res. 57, 1559–
1562.
Tiwari, A., VanLeeuwen, J.A., Dohoo, I.R., Stryhn, H., Keefe, G.P.,
Haddad, J.P., 2005. Effects of seropositivity for bovine leukemia
virus, bovine viral diarrhea virus, Mycobacterium avium subspe-
cies paratuberculosis, and Neospora caninum on culling in dairy
cattle in four Canadian provinces. Vet. Microbiol. 109, 147–158.
Uggla, A., Stenlund, S., Holmdahl, O.J.M., Jakubek, E.B., Thebo, T.,
Kindahl, H., Bjorkman, C., 1998. Oral Neospora caninum inocu-
lation of neonatal calves. Int. J. Parasitol. 28, 1467–1472.
Von Blumroder, D., Schares, G., Norton, R., Williams, D.J., Esteban-
Redondo, I., Wright, S., Bjorkman, C., Frossling, J., Risco-Cas-
tillo, Fernandez-Garcia, A., Ortega-Mora, L.M., Sager, H., Hemp-
hill, A., van Maanen, C., Wouda, W., Conraths, F.J., 2004.
Comparison and standardisation of serological methods for the
diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection in bovines. Vet. Para-
sitol. 120, 11–22.
Waldner, C.L., Janzen, E.D., Henderson, J., Haines, D.J., 1999. Out-
break of abortion associated with Neospora caninium infection in
a beef herd. J. Am. Vet. Med. Ass. 215, 1485–1489.
Weston, J.F., Williamson, N.B., Pomroy, W.E., Olson, W., 2005.
Friesian/Jersey crossbred heifers that were previously consistently
seronegative to Neospora caninum were challenged at 70 days
gestation. In: 20th International Conference of the World Associa-
tion for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (WAAVP),
Christchurch, New Zealand.
Wouda, W., Dijkstra, Th., Kramer, A.M.H., Maanen, C., van, Brin-
khof, J.M.A., 1999. Seroepidemiological evidence for a relation-
ship between Neospora caninum infections in dogs and cattle. Int.
J. Parasitol. 29, 1677–1682.
Wouda, W., Brinkhof, J., van Maanen, C., de Gee, A.L.W., Moen,
A.R., 1998. Serodiagnosis of neosporosis in individual cows and
dairy herds: a comparative study of three enzyme-linked immu-
nosorbent assays. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 5, 711–716.
Wouda, W., Moen, A.R., Schukken, Y.H., 1998. Abortion risk in
progeny of cows after a Neospora caninum epidemic. Theriogen-
ology 49, 1311–1316.