QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE: SUPPLIER …

_3

YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT CDOCUMENT APPROVAL SHI

QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE: SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALSUPPLIERS LIST

APPROVAL

PROJECT MANAGER: Originalsigned by

emra, fr-,tt 11/22/89DateSignature

DIRECTOR OF QUALITY ASSURANCE: James Blaylock 11/22/89DateSignature

T&MSS Proj. Xgr.

(OTHER, AS REQUIRED)

W. V. HacnabbSignature

11/20/89Date

REVISION 0 EFFECTIVE DATE: 11/29/89.

REVISIONS

INITIAL AND DATEREVISION 2 REVISION 3 REVISION 4

DIRECTOR. QA:

If )/)Jm hd&� �t-. 6 #R156

N/A

(OTHER. AS REQUIRED)

N/A

EFFECTIVE DATE:10/19/90

Pae I d 45901101020S 901026PDR WSTE PDCWM-1 1

YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90

TiteQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

T-his procedure establishes the requirements, responsibilities and methods forevaluating suppliers and maintaining the Yucca Mountain Project Office(Project Office) Qualified Suppliers List (QSL).

2.0 APPLIC&BILIfl

2.1 This procedure applies to the evaluation and selection of suppliersthat provide services purchased in accordance with the requirements of theOffice of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) Quality AssuranceProgram Description Document (QAPD), Section VII, Control of Purchased Itemsand Services.

2.2 This procedure applies to Project Office staff involved in supplierevaluations activities for services affecting quality.

2.3 The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is exemptfrom the requirements of this procedure.

3.0 DEFINITIONS

3.1 FACILITY SURVEY

An activity which involves a direct evaluation of the supplier's facility todetermine the capabilities of a supplier to satisfy the procurement documentquality requirements for a defined or anticipated scope of work, byevaluating the supplier's facilities, personnel and quality assurance (QA)program implementation, thereby ensuring only qualified suppliers areselected and utilized.

3.2 QUALIFIED SUPPLIER

A supplier that has been evaluated and determined to be capable of providingservices, as appropriate, in accordance with the requirements of theprocurement documents.

3.3 QUALIFIED SUPPLIER LIST

A list of qualified suppliers that have been evaluated to determine theircapability to supply services and have been categorized as Qualified.*

Effective Date Revison Supersedes Page No.

10/19/90 1 QHP-07-04, Revision 0 2 i 45 QMP-07-04


QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

3.4 SERVICE

The performance by a supplier of activities such as design, design review,nondestructive examination, inspection, analyses, audit, testing,calibration, surveillance, training, and etc.

3.5 SUPPLIER

Any individual or organization under contract for furnishing services. Thisincludes the terms vendor, consultant, seller, contractor, subcontractor, andtheir sub-tier level suppliers where appropriate.

3.6 TRIENNIAL AUDIT

The triennial period begins when an audit is performed. An audit may beperformed when the supplier has completed sufficient work to demonstrate thatits organization is implementing a QA program that has the required scope forpurchases placed during the triennial period. A facility survey, whenperformed in accordance with this Quality Management Procedure (OMP), Section5.4, Facility Survey, qualifies as the first triennial audit.

4.0 RESPONSIBILITIES

4.1 PROJECT OFFICE, DIRECTOR, QA

The Director, QA shall have overall responsibility for the establishment andimplementation of the supplier evaluation program as described in thisprocedure, and:

4.2.1 Ensuring through evaluation, that the supplier is capable of complyingwith quality requirements in accordance with the procurementdocuments.

4.2.2 Approving supplier evaluations.

4.2.3 Approving the QSL, including all revisions and change notices thereto.

4.2.4 Approving QSL deletion notices.

4.2.5 Ensuring that surveillances and audits are performed in accordancewith established procedures, once a supplier has been placed on theQSL.

Effective Date Revision Supersedes Page No.

10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 3 i 45 QMP-07-04

'YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4"O

TitueQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

4.3 PROJECT OFFICE QA

Project Office QA shall be responsible for:

4.3.1 Conducting evaluations of suppliers in accordance with therequirements of this procedure.

4.3.2 Maintaining the QSL in accordance with the requirements of thisprocedure.

4.3.3 Transmitting the approved QSL, including all revisions, changenotices, and deletions thereto to Document Control for controlleddistribution in accordance with Administrative Procedure (AP)-1.5Q,Issuance and Maintenance of Controlled Documents.

4.3.4 Performing supplier surveillance and audits in accordance withapproved procedures.

4.4 CONTRACTING OFFICER TECHNICAL REPRESENTATION (COTR)

The COTR shall be responsible for:

4.4.1 Providing the contracting officer a list of potential suppliers, usinginput from the requester, trade publications, registers, referrals,and other sources of information.

4.4.2 Requesting the contracting officer to arrange for Project Office QAevaluation of suppliers.

4.5 TECHNICAL SPECIALISTS

Technical specialists shall be responsible for planning and conducting thetechnical phase of a facility survey (when assigned or requested by theprocuring organization). The technical evaluation is performed under the

direction of Project Office QA and is incorporated into the Project Office QAevaluation.

5.0 PROCEDURE

5.1 EVALUATION OF SUPPLIERS

5.1.1 General Requirements

5.1.1.1 The evaluation of suppliers for addition to the QSL shall beconducted in accordance with one, or a combination of, the following:quality records review, supplier history review, or a facility survey.



YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT .OPROCEDURE 4190

Tlt'.QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

5.1.1.2 Suppliers may be placed on the QSL, through an evaluation of thesupplier's capability to implement the quality elements.

1. Evaluations shall be conducted by Project Office QA personnel anddocumented on the Supplier's Evaluation Report, Figure 2. Theresults of the evaluation shall be submitted to the Project OfficeDirector, QA for approval.

2. Evaluation of commercial suppliers shall be performed specific tothe service and associated quality elements as specified in theprocurement document in accordance with QMP-04-02 Yucca MountainProject Office Procurement Actions.

5.1.1.3 Deficiencies identified during supplier evaluation activities shallbe resolved with the supplier or acceptable corrective action obtained fromthe supplier prior to approving the supplier for placement on the QSL.Justification for approving the supplier prior to the implementation ofcorrective action shall be documented on the Supplier Evaluation Report.

5.1.1.4 Based upon the evaluation results, the supplier may be categorizedas "Qualified' or "Qualified with RestrictionsO. The 'Qualified' suppliershall be placed on the QSL.

5.1.1.5 For those suppliers categorized as "Qualified with Restrictionswthe restriction shall be noted on the QSL in the restriction column. Asupplier's committed corrective actions shall either be verified prior toplacement of the purchase document or concurrently by requiring sourcesurveillance in the purchase document to verify implementation of thecommitted actions.

5.2 QUALITY RECORDS REVIEW

5.2.1 The supplier's quality records supported by qualitative andquantitative information may be objectively evaluated. This shallinclude the review and evaluation of the supplier's QA program manual,procedures, or other similar documents, including subsequentrevisions. The Supplier Quality Program Review checklist, Figure 3,shall be used for this review/evaluation.

1. Comments generated during the review/evaluation shall betransmitted to the supplier utilizing the QA DocumentationApproval Sheet, Figure 4.

2. Comments which are not resolved within 30 days and couldjeopardize quality may be cause for the supplier to be removedfrom the QSL.


10/19/90 1 - QP-07-04, Revision 0 5 Of 45 QMP-07-04

YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT 4-AD-001PROCEDURE 480

TrbeQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

5.3 SUPPLIER HISTORY REVIEW

Supplier history reviews/evaluations may be conducted by Project Office QAbased upon documented information relative to the supplier's past performancein providing the same or similar services.

1. This evaluation shall include the following sources of inputinformation:

a. QA records that have accumulated in connection with previousprocurement actions and service operating experience. Theserecords include but are not limited to Purchase Orders,Supplier Nonconformance Documents, Source Verification, AuditReports or information from other purchasers relative tosupplier's performance in supplying the same or similarservices.

b. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection results andsupplier background information as documented in the currentNUREG-0040.

c. NRC Information Notices and Bulletins.

5.4 FACILITY SURVEY

5.4.1 Facility surveys may be conducted by the Project Office QAorganization when determined to be necessary. The necessity toconduct a facility survey shal. take into consideration, but need notbe limited to, the following ::-.itions:

1. Evaluation of the comple:::v-y, criticality, application, inherentcharacteristics or simi'a: considerations reveals that specialattention to the quality program implementation should be taken.

2. Documented evidence does not exist to confirm that the supplierhas successfully implemented his quality program.

3. The results of the quality records and supplier history reviewsdo not provide sufficient evidence that the supplier's qualityprogram complies with the quality requirements.

5.4.2 Supplier Scheduling and Notification

1. Project Office QA shall --::rdinate through the COTR to requestthe contracting officer : notify potential suppliers of intendedsurveys. Mutually accep:.z-e date(s) shall be established and

Eftectve Date Revision Supersedes Page No.

10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 6 i 4 5 QNP-07-04



the survey scheduled. The schedule shall allow sufficient timefor preparation and allocation of survey duration to investigate.all factors influencing quality.

5.4.3 Facility Survey Planning

1. The responsible Project Office QA evaluator shall initiate aSurvey Checklist, Figure 3. The checklist shall address theappropriate quality element requirements of the procurementdocument (QMP-04-02). The checklist may be supplemented withadditional characteristics, as necessary, to adequately evaluatea given supplier.

2. When necessary,-the checklist will be supplemented by a list ofcharacteristics prepared by the technical specialist that addresstechnical requirements of the procurement document.

5.4.4 Conduct of the Facility Survey

1. A pre-survey conference shall be conducted at the supplierfacility. This conference shall be attended by members of thesurvey team and the appropriate supplier managementrepresentative. The pre-survey conference should address:

a. Introduction of team members and supplier representatives.b. Purpose and Scope of the survey.c. Objective.d. Topics/area to be surveyed.

2. A tour of the facility shall be performed, to observe theoperations and implementation of the suppliers quality programand to determine the suppliers capabilities. The SurveyChecklist shall be completed. Objective evidence shall beexamined for compliance with the checklist requirements to thedepth necessary to determine if the quality program elements areadequate for effective control and are being implementedeffectively. The results shall be documented on the checklist.

3. Upon completion of the survey, an exit conference shall be usedto summarize the survey results and indicate the areas ofsupplier quality and/or technical program that have beendetermined to be acceptable or unsatisfactory. This conferencewill also afford the suppliers management the opportunity toinitiate corrective action or provide additionalinformation/documentation to resolve the apparent deficiency.



YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4

rWeQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

5.5 REPORTING

5:5.1 A Supplier Evaluation Report, Figure 2, shall be completed by theProject Office QA evaluator. This report shall include the results ofany technical specialist evaluations. The following shall beaddressed:

1. The evaluator shall review the supplier survey checklists todetermine the status of each characteristic evaluated . Thefollowing ratings shall be applied: Qualified, Qualified withRestrictions, Unsatisfactory, or Not Applicable.

2. For each Qualified with Restrictions or Unsatisfactory rating, anexplanatory statement shall be given that delineates therestriction bounds or explains the Unsatisfactory rating.

3. The overall supplier status shall be indicated. The followingstatus indicators shall be applied: Qualified, Qualified withRestrictions, or Unsatisfactory. All restrictions shall be fullydetailed. A complete explanation shall be provided for suppliersnot placed on the QSL. A description of the two statusindicators is as follows:

a. Qualified. Selection of this disposition indicates that thesupplier has met necessary requirements consistent with thehighest quality level for which the supplier is approved.

b. Qualified with Restrictions. A prospective supplier may bequalified with restrictions if the supplier is capable ofperforming specific operations for which the qualityrequirements are readily measured. Specific compensatoryprovisions to ensure full compliance with the qualityrequirements shall be specified in the purchase document.

5.5.2 The Supplier Evaluation Report for Qualified or Qualified withRestriction(s) shall be signed and dated by the person(s) whoperformed the supplier evaluation and approved by the Project Office,Director, QA. For those suppliers with an unsatisfactory rating, onlythe evaluator signs the report, which is then maintained as anin-process document until such time as the supplier corrects theunsatisfactory conditions and resubmits the corrective action forre-evaluation.

5.5.3 Evaluated suppliers qualified with restrictions, or determined to beunsatisfactory shall be notified per Section 5.6. After receipt ofsupplier documented corrective action, the supplier shall bere-evaluated in accordance with this QMP.

Effeclive Date Revision | Supersedes Page No.



TiteQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

5.6 SUPPLIER NOTIFICATION

A--letter shall be prepared by Project Office QA and issued within 30 days ofthe Supplier Quality History Review or Facility Survey Evaluation to informthe supplier of the evaluation results. When the results are qualified withrestriction or not qualified, the unsatisfactory program areas requiringCorrective Action or the program restrictions shall be delineated in theletter. The QA Documentation Approval Sheet, Figure 4, shall be initiatedand enclosed with the letter for a Suppliers Quality Records Review. Itshall indicate the Document, Revision, Description, Approval Status, andComments requiring resolution and/or program restrictions.

5.7 QSL ADMINISTRATION

5.7.1 Subsequent to the supplier evaluation and approval of the evaluationby the Project Office QA, suppliers deemed to be acceptable shall becategorized as Qualified/'Qualified with Restrictions" and placed onthe QSL, Figure 5.

5.7.2 QSL Content

1. The QSL shall contain the following information, as a minimum:

a. Supplier name/specific location. -

b. Identification of the type of quality program implemented bythe supplier based upon supplier evaluations).

c. Service scope for which the supplier has been approved.

d. Restrictions (if applicable).

e. The date of the next required evaluation. Each listedsupplier shall reflect a date (yr/mo) which defines when thenext evaluation is due. This activity shall be performedannually.

f. Next required audit date. Enter the month and year threeyears from the facility survey date or from the first auditdate. (See Definition: triennial audit). Leave this columnblank if a facility survey or audit of the supplier has notbeen performed.

g. Suppliers QA Manual revision level/date.

h. Remarks relative to the supplier's capability.


10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 9 Of 45 Q -07-04


r~ueQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

5.7.3 QSL Revision

Based upon the results of supplier evaluation and supplier maintenanceactivities, suppliers may be added, retained, or deleted from the QSL.

1. The QSL shall be revised quarterly, (if necessary), toincorporate change notices occurring during the quarter. TheProject Office, Director, QA shall document approval of the QSLrevisions or changes.

2. QSL changes, which affect location, scope, or restrictionsoccurring during the quarterly period shall be documented on theQSL Cover Page/Change Notice approved by the Project Officer,Director, QA.

3. QA shall forward the approved QSL, revisions, and change noticesto Document Control for controlled distribution in accordancewith AP-1.5Q.

5.8 SUPPLIER MAINTENANCE

5.8.1 General

1. Suppliers may be maintained on the QSL through one or acombination of evaluations, surveillances or audits whichdemonstrate the supplier's capability to implement requiredquality elements.

a. Supplier maintenance activities shall be documented on theSupplier Evaluation Sheet, Figure 2, and approved by theProject Office, Director, QA.

b. Based upon the results of supplier maintenance activities,the supplier shall be retained or deleted from the QSL, asdirected by the Project Office, Director, QA. Activesuppliers shall not be deleted if an audit is required butis overdue. Active suppliers are those who have providedservices within one year of the scheduled audit date.

2. Deficiencies identified during supplier evaluations shall beresolved with the supplier or acceptable corrective actionobtained from the supplier prior to evaluation approval.

3. Supplier evaluation identified restrictions and documentedcommitments made by the supplier, and not implemented prior tothe supplier being approved for retention on the QSL, shall bedocumented in the restrictions column of the QSL.



-4


ree*QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

5.8.2 Justification for Retention on QSL

Suppliers shall be reviewed annually by Project Office QA.

1. This review shall take into consideration the extent to which thesupplier has been used in the past, the uniqueness of the serviceprovided, and anticipated future need for the particularservice(s).

2. Suppliers to be deleted shall be identified on the QSL DeletionNotice, Figure 7. The Deletion Notice shall be approved by theDirector, QA and distributed to:

a. The manager of the organization initially requesting thesupplier.

b. The manager of any organization utilizing the supplier inthe previous twelve (12) months.

c. COTR.

3. Adequate justification shall be provided for maintaining thesupplier on the QSL within fifteen (15) days of issuance of theQSL Deletion Notice. Otherwise, a QSL Cover Page/Change Noticewill be initiated to delete the supplier from the QSL. Suppliersmay be deleted without the QSL Deletion Notice when the supplierhas gone out of business, refuses to comply with the requirementsof purchasing documents, or is unacceptable as evidenced by themaintenance activities.

4. Based on the justificat.^:z, the Project Office, Director, QA,shall either approve or :.sapprove the deletion of the supplierfrom the QSL.

5.8.3 Annual Performance Evaluation

This evaluation shall be conducted by the Project Office QAorganization and shall include the following, as appropriate:

1. Review of the suppliers currently approved QA program, manual,procedures or other implementing documents.

2. Review of audits and surveillance reports performed by theProject Office QA organization of the supplier.

Etladve Date Revision Supersedes Page No.

10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 11 i 45 QtQ-07-04


TitQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS-LIST

3. Review of corrective action documents. This review shall includean evaluation of the cause, severity, and remedial correctiveaction.

4. Examination of Project Office/Supplier initiated correspondence.

5. Review of NRC data, i.e., NUREG-0040, Information Notices,Bulletins, etc.

6. Other data, i.e., audits conducted by other project participants,DOE projects or nuclear utilities.

7. Trend summaries.

8. Request and obtain from the Cost Account Manager (CAM) an annualevaluation of the supplier's performance.

9. When the results of an annual performance evaluation indicate asignificant decline in supplier performance, an audit shall bescheduled and performed prior to the required triennial audit.

5.8.4 Triennial Audits

The triennial audit period shall be established from the date of theFacility Survey and/or Initial Supplier Audit. The supplier's qualityprogram shall then be audited triennially, at a minimum, in accordancewith QME-18-01 Audit System for the Waste Management Project Office.The audit schedule shall be adjusted in the event of significantchange in supplier's personnel, organization, QA program or annualperformance evaluation. In addition, the need for an audit of thesupplier shall be evaluated when major changes to the purchasedocument's scope of work or work methodology occurs.

6.0 REFERENCES*

6.1 SOURCE DOCUMENTS

1. OCRWM, QAPD, DOE/RW-0215, Section 7, Control of Purchased Items andServices.

2. ANSI/ASME NQA-1, Criteria 7, Control of Purchased Items andServices.

3. ANSI/ASME NQA-1, Supplement 7S-1, Supplementary Requirements forControl of Purchased Items and Services.

Effective Dale Revision Supersedes Page No.

10/19/90 1 QM-07-04, Revision 0 12 i 45 QMP-07-04


rETtQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

6.2 INTERFACING DOCUMENTS

1. NUREG-0040, Licensee, Contractor and Vendor Inspection StatusReport.

2. QMP-04-02, Project Office Procurement Actions.

3. QMP-16-02, Trend Analysis.

4. QMP-17-01, Records Management: Records Source Implementation.

5. QMP-18-01, Audit System for the Waste Management Project Office.

6. QMP-18-02, Surveillances.

7. AP-5.1Q, Issue and Maintenance of Controlled Documents.

7.0 FIGURES

Figure 1. Sample Supplier Evaluation Report.

Figure 2. Sample Supplier QA Program Checklist and Supplement forms.

Figure 3. Sample QA Documentation Approval Sheet.

Figure 4. Sample QSL Transmittal Letter and QSL forms.

Figure 5. Sample QSL Cover Page/Change Notice.

Figure 6. Sample QSL Deletion Notice.

8.0 QA RECORDS

A record package consisting of the figures resulting from the implementationof this procedure, are designated as QA records and shall be processed inaccordance with QMP-17-01, Records Management: Records SourceImplementation.

Effectwe Date Revision Supersedes Page No.


YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECTPROCEDURE


£11.1

Eyaluate Iofra ddfionblotm

B~ QSLbypedomingcombinaon d

rovws " reeded

I

Page1 d0rOW-O0Q041

Figure 1. Flowchart of QP-07-04.

YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT -Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4O90

Ttle.QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Pg. 2d3T4-?sOanl40o

Figure 1. Flowchart of QMP-07-04. (continued)

Effective Date Revision Supersedes ge No.

10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 15 Of 45 QMP-07-04

.Jt


risQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Paged3sV704047X01

Figure 1. Flowchart of QMP-07-04. (continued)

Effectiv Date Revision Supersedes Page No.



rbuQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Docunar Pa . of -

SUPPUER EVALUATION REPORT R A4GE9 1

PURPOSE: 0 ADOITION 0 CHANGE 0 PROGRAM REVISIONO ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 0 TRIENNIAL AUOITO OTHER (cfy

SWPLIER NAJEJADORESS CONTACT NAME/tnE

U TELEPHONE

P7L SPECIFATON SCOPE SERVICEIR_

O PROCUREMENT DOCCUMENT NUI.BER(S)0

U GA MANUAL STATUSAMT

N CODESIS1D COMMITTED TO IN OA MANUAL

31ICFWORB 0 NOA-1.O ANSI.N 45.2 0 COMMERCIAL

Ty CIOUY RECORDS REVIEW 0 FACLTY SURVEYF O3 SUPPLER HISTORYI- SUPPLER DOCUllENTED COMMITMENTS

IE

T

CT

N

AM

KR

Cominuwod0

A DcwzUALIED0oU~jM'W iH REEVALUATION DUE DATE_______AUDOIT DUE DATE

c RESTRICTION.

A DIRECTOF_L AUJTY ASSURANCE S iDM

Figure 2. Sample Supplier Evaluation Report.


10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 17 d 45 QMP-07-04

-E YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90

Ti..QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Dwcumnt Pap - of

SUPPUER EVALUATION REPORTFORM PAGE 2OF 4

SUPPLIER NAME:

CRITERION NO. OALWIT ELEMENT SAT UNSAT WAO*RGANIATI

itSAft ASSUPIAMc PRORAMS OESGN CONTROL

PROAREMENt OCUAENT _

E ISTRUCION. PCEWuRes NO DRAWINGS

* ocenT COaTROLO 7 CCONTRa. OF PLOCKUM MATERAL. EUIPMNT M SERVS

U 5 IDENTfIATIO AM CONTROL OF MATERIA.S. PARTS AM CCWOMP TS

A 0 CONTt.CF OfSPECALPROCESSESLI 10 INPCTION

T 11 TETCOTOY 12 CONTROL a ?ASURLNG AD TEST fEQPMENT

tS WANOLNG. STOP;E AND SHIPPING_

A U 14SPSCTIU4. TEST AND OPERATNG STATUS

C Is NONCNOR* ING MATERAL PARTS OA COCKNTS

O 1 COFRECTIYEACTIO0 1-

I s AUDTSs

DEScRPToN CF OJALIY ASSURANE PRORAM. MANUAL. PAceDURES O OTHER SISLAR DOAEW(SVEWECVALUATEDI

E ii~~~~~~~TU REVSO D ATEE

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

V

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

w

SUVEYIAUDIT DATE AITWU R __

C AUDIT PERFORMED BY:

SURVEY AUDIT RESULTS

TY

ASEUyRIOE

wV

P

O OEP1CIfINCIESdPINDINGSIDENTIFIED D YES (3 No

OCcUMENTE COMMTMENTlS FMR OPEN DEFICIENCIESMFCNG.S REVIEWED 0YS DC 0Wc AND FOUND ACCEPTABLE

0E1CEN:Ef1DIGSRESCIVELOSED 0 YES 03 wo

Figure 2. Sample Supplier Evaluation Report (continued).

Effeive Date Revision Supersedes Page No.

10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 18 O 45 QMP-07-04

YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4O90

TreQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Docurrunt Paop of

SUPPLIER EVALUATION REPORT FORM PAGE 3OF 4

SUPPLIER NAME:0OCUMENT TYPE TLUREMARIU

ACTiON. Wa.. SOA(a)SUPPLER WONCONFORIACE REPORTps)

SOURCE SMVEIULANCE REPORTS

SUP PREVIOUS PERIODIC AUDITSSURVEYS. St.

PLI WSiUPPUER INITIAlED

E CORRESPONDENCE

R

NRC DOCAMENTS. La.. CUREGSO0O,

H ME NO . eTINS.M.

IT OTHER (SpW)

0Ry

SUPPLIER RATG: OWlJFIED OOUAZDJWITH RESTRICTIONS 0NOT APPLUCAE

EVALUAT

0N

ES

T Ci'nud OS STRRCTId. PLERVERFCATcIOAC1WrlTES SOCOiENMTE erU CrtSAAEAuPLsEz o sEl

F OES. CENlY CN ILNM 9WALUATnI ES. PAGE 1.

"TDIMtOA_ -- off DAl!


Effective Date ReviSIon Supersedes Page No.

10/19/90 1 QWP-07-04, Revision 0 19 i 45 QMP-0,-04

I

YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD49 1PROCEDURE

TitseQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

____ ____ ____ ____ ______ _____ __ Docununt Pap - of -

SUPPLIER EVALUATION REPORT FOR PGE4 FFORMI PAGE 4 OF 4

SUPPUERMMWE: - I--TEM NO:


Effective Date Revision Supetsede Page No.

10/19/90 1 QW-07-04, Revision 0 20 Of 45 OW-07-04

.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


TM*QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM CHECKLIST

1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE

This Supplier Quality Evaluation Checklist establishes the measures utilizedfor evaluating the Supplier Quality Program.

2.0 APPLICABILITY

This checklist applies to the evaluation of a supplier's quality program forcompliance to the requirements defined in the procurement document's scope ofwork for service activities affecting quality.

3.0 GUIDELINES

3.1 The evaluator shall be guided by this checklist and any applicablesupplements generated, as appropriate, to the potential supplier's programand supplier's capability under evaluation.

3.2 Review the supplier's quality manual (or programs) for compliance withthe requirements for the type program delineated in their quality manual andapplicable to the evaluation. Use the 'Statement Location' on the checklistto document where a particular requirement is referenced in the supplier'squality manual. The evaluator shall record any marginal or questionableconclusions or nonconformances in the wComment' spaces provided, as required.

3.3 Prior to a facility survey, the procurement documents shall be reviewedto establish:

1. The type of procurement under consideration.

2. The type of quality program required.

3. Any scheduling requirements.

4. Any pertinent information necessary, such as a unique or difficultprocess involved, a critical characteristic, or an area-requiringparticular attention.

5. The need for a Technical Specialist participation.

Effoctve Date Re*ion Supemedes Page No.

10/19/90 1 W -07-04, Revision 0 '21 0 45 CM-07-04


Tit.QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

3.4 For facility surveys, a supplemental checklist may be generated for useduring the survey, based on the requirements stated in the Supplier QualityProgram. The checklist will include questions to be asked and objectiveevidence to be identified that will verify effective implementation of thesupplier's quality program. The checklist should also be used to confirm orclose out any open or action items from the initial program evaluation.

3.5 Accomplishment of the facility survey requires a determination that theevidence offered by the supplier meets the requirements under consideration.The evaluator shall record the identification of supporting evidence on thechecklist, as well as, observations as to their adequacy or compliance withthe checklist criteria.

3.6 Facility surveys are recognized as a sampling operation. The evaluatorexamines objective evidence to verify conformance to the requirements underevaluation. The evaluator is responsible for an adequate sample withsufficient depth of examination to conform the required quality system forthe service concerned with the potential procurement.

3.7 Commercial grade supplier selections will be based on technicalcapability and establishment of QA measures appropriate to the services to beprovided as established in the procurement documents. For example:

1. In developing the QA requirements for a supplier furnishing designanalysis, the following requirements of ANSI/ASME NQA-1 would apply.

CRITERIA TITLE REQUIREMENTS

1 Organization Partial Only2 QA Program Partial Only3 Design Control Mandatory5 Instructions, Procedures & Drawings Mandatory6 Document Control Mandatory16 Corrective Action Mandatory17 QA Records Mandatory18 Audits Mandatory

2. In developing the QA requirements for procuring conceptual tests,there are no mandatory requirements from ANSI/ASME NQA-1. Optionalrequirements to be evaluated for inclusion could include Criteria 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 16, 17, and 18.

Effecive Dato Revision Supersedes Page.


YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-OO1PROCEDURE 4/90

1-t'rWe


3. In developing the QA requirements for procuring laboratoryanalytical services and speciality processing, the followingrequirements of ANSI/ASME NQA-1 would apply.

CRITERIA

125689111213161718

TITLE

OrganizationQA programInstructions, Procedures & DrawingsDocument ControlIdentification and ControlControl of ProcessTest ControlControl of Measuring & Test EquipmentHandling, Storage & ShippingCorrective ActionQA RecordsAudits

Partial OnlyPartial OnlyNormal Operating-Normal OperatingNormal OperatingNormal OperatingNormal OperatingNormal OperatingNormal OperatingNormal OperatingNormal OperatingOptional

REQUIREMENTS

MethodsMethodsMethodsMethodsMethodsMethodsMethodsMethodsMethods

Effeeive Date Revision Supersedes Page.

10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 23 i 45 giP-07-04

YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD 001PROCEDURE


Doaxnn Page. of

SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE na-e9g.PROGRAM CHECKLIST FORM PAGE I O 13

SUPPERS NAME__ EVALT BY:FACUTY AOPESS. WE:

CITYJSTATE: fROGRAM YPE: I I tOCFR5I8 I I ANSI N 45.2DPOOE: | ANSIASMENOA-1 I ICOMUERAL

STATMN allAM PORAM1TEn CA PORAM EVAWA1M TEMA _OOE 3 OMENTS

10 ORAGAWIlN

1.1 Hu n aw.WA u CIA WV-?

1.2 II uope asporutweb okMinm If CA pagnam?

1.3 I wpmaa*Aty NUWW. by W*Oi tr CIA u'&M &**A ft 0 Of AU MaN Or "G A

1 4 QIUI ke Wd &A" _of W$ _ _r_ _

1.4 td In W"?

W rd aaom VdAlt

Twaft. Qam cWor bkfly bd -M

a t Toyd hpwt w& ewilyhimy onbm we pmw dmm7

4.9 cc WiVUkg hialiu gtomakq .to w tA..

V wwibb fo pd&w W

p Ondt hih ad4U okvME[

1.7 him ti km ft usieft W PWASiO

4U*i t eia wuUtie GApi

. toaS h _ 7

a. Rag " mwwpea an bee.~m Ut

_it _A may an _t _1n d b

SECTIN I.0 SWIUARY COOMEM

KEY TO aOALlY PROGRAM EC;Oli* tOCuFRO SPP1 * SUANAS&EW IA4 t * ANSW uA 4 .COMENCLAL SPPLEN

Figure 3. Sample Supplier QA Program Checklist.

Effedve Date Resion Supersedes Page No.


YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001.PROCEDURE 4/90

1-It'.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

QM2-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Douram Page- d

SUPPER QUALTY ASSURANCE 114"92

PROGRAM CHECKLIST FORM PAGE 2 OF 13

TIM CA PROAM WVAWATION CRITEM RATEWT UCOMUEBM

_i UXO If It Il a

_ . buudoiw _____?___ _1_

2." A*Pt dummkrd CA "bn ta M5a cPCiw bw p7 ,__ __

U4 M. WI. a w, t be mWd by b. CA la__ __e Mude?_ ____

_o awMn I noc" ben Wen___

&a pmrwn pmids mi"o* ewt rds"g .n# V Wnl" nwVge.ls 3af *lAdtslemoif " iun d' am W tg I

d peIamw

&a. w. eppoIwe awqns? nwwt

L WB d wo"9*V

b S. unce of w ecx "f hi a dl VVWI adim

_ e bee _ _ _ _ _

c. Tea Eqise? __________

r. Too? _ _

U Do. -gm Wi M tW3ma V

_ 9 3 b h-ape4i _M _ _e _

e" n

a Td e um wi

1aM UzID w M

11Dose mnh miuwV mebwi ta OMi esaac"y41e Mus CA ,uuun?

112 Dos NwfqeimiW d sew _galona P_ _Odn

pivt CA POrun u I*bWusn aM 0*4 El

SECTON to SUMLARY CMMENTL

Figure 3. Sample Supplier QA Program Checklist (continued).


10/19/90 1 QP-07-04, Revision 0 25 f 45 QMP-07-04

. YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-O1PROCEDURE 4/90

Ths- QMP-07-04, REVISION 1

SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

SUPPUER QUALITY ASSURANCE 11.8-89-2PROGRAM CHECKLIST FORM PAGE 3 OF 13

CIA AOGPM EALUAIONCAITRLA STATEMENT @*ALITY RAOOM TYPEI_TEM VTATIN . COMENTS _ITD F P _ _W _ W _ s x_ tOC~llO II 1 1 *5° 1 14 1Si

CO ESIV COkN74OL

&I Am uml saWAbhWd ei anum f0 apWpk_ _pdred lgn ftQuhmmfh. Kic 4 duulw baaos.MrA~ry mqi**mm. 4I-d .a lmIdbrdl 41

3atysdAW hkW WOM ISiA.PCkid hM _ _ __ _

as olty sandwa m W.di~d aid hkcjd hk

_ M ioofMW ___rdc ___ _ __

*aft .adwu wwrmd. gowmntid on e lAsd

3.4 Ams rnawaiur okbl**d for whIcu P11d uWIhAw tar

smfid posas it mob esanh W hiW$ 3mb sd~tyml

_ icns at am e U _ ______140 | d " od=k g. maaims seiaab%&W tr Si. MW0~asln aiafntd of dsign hb^d and br ONMAIM &nmi-j_. - _________ __

U 00 6rwd tau wp e Iwt at doA or

d o~el. wluw. bt* me aod m% or tdea

17 Do to ouitidmus wpmtdtow WfOr e a

Ilasit bew, by Viekl mb b w W* ed a ah

mioftdeftna julos In by o parrwm WAte eor

_deig proodrami _ __ _ __

wbdojd a Po10os WiA Vi. atoMM atwd

SII Ame Vie p mtaxi m e Ig ur 1bdo MNW y wVdi

bI wSf r mSmd "1 WS N

_ dWeigsln hfae hmi 0& _a _g _ __ .

h1 Ae &M. d-uw M bw td ID%f soi prN mezs. imj omicn~bb ami .

ml w design W malinst ard s _ww _db __

. wsde .at _I ___

at hst

5. bIAC at _VW inl _e _ _ _

Vi:e Vidie dsX aioth mob gbei

- . - _ U U L _


Efledtive Date Revision Supersedes Page N

10/19/90 1 QM2-07-04, Revision 0 26 O 45 QHP-07-04

.7


TieeQMP-07-04, REVISION 1-SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Docamwt Page- d

SUPPUER QUALITY ASSURANCE ,,-,9-2PROGRAM CHECKLIST FORM PAGE 4 OF 13

SECTION 3.0 SUUMAAY COMM~ENTS.

llEU OA PPAXRAM EVAUJAION iCI LOCTION A POGAEM 1 1

4.0 PAOCUREMDET VOCUMEWT CONTROL.

4.1 Die wernxaa wiathed t anurs that appkrsbNoubhry wQjiMe%. #&SW beast NW coweinqukamewo w~d we eawuary ID wafts adequath

*aft we VAW* bmdjd r relermaied k to*=WtA be aFumntd IIme aNd Vre"ms.etalber pumhand by oh Nower by ft abfnwt~at?

2 0apoaMwtdocua t pmawthebbwt*. a oppkal"?

She SOTzrO to pwor swkaw th tie ft"N sorwim prwld. ______.

e.VdWi a -. Nd tn codes 1at md

e.w wft. .njd, Ama w. hbiaaWt.sw - VSudte bomV. twd. 1 0 9 ,ia thdode ed - mdfr _1 _WMa ____.

C. Pwiow fr :"I8 013 %cm ad

d. Recrds ID bo mprepre. minmkihrd. kembyad awaft eveob %w WANW.

0. hwacsw manm utaiw mad dispowun

L. Prmtor hr *Wodmg wekalcebi m*nqteu dtpowxefwt docuanaf' ID bvntr hW&*mnlckws~.mid eupetere bidodei Iee NWd birwre

4.3 Co *dlere promyensen dawrwo reqi*a convacor &Aiwwer to orwlde a quaft - sewe wowwbh ovomfi ehpalhmlo PMu~bi0"6t1*at th -fad

£ECTIO# 4.0 V~MUARY COMMUENTS:



10/19/90 QMP -07-04, Revision 0 27 Of 45 QM-07-04

YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT - Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90

rovQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Documerd Page. of

SUPPUER QUALITY ASSURANCE 11.&9-2PROGRAM CHECKLIST FORM PAGES OF 13

_TAEIIENT JAXY POGRAM rvnITEM CA PROGRAM VVAWATIM CWTrERIA - -TO Co - -COMMENTE

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 It 12 1 Id

S. mSThU:,lXlO6 REE AND DP-YwllNS T1111Li Af* act.U. affefti wAfmty pmatr by ISMt-

mgntd 31Mg. bmgi=aa. Po=Mxs Ordiww

&2 A Wi. Gromhpm W _ _ No Me

SD Dohnu~au. prgm.s ha ~.bdV"cw P=" r **C*WDorftr~a um". NqajilW "*W n a

mabde Tor dstma- W brrM Pu lw-

S£C1T SeWMARY COMMENTS:

6 DOCMENT CONnTR

Li ke wsmaw UA& inmbh Wla tmio( biami Otdeaaaeiil. Wsuh as htwaakr. Pcadu mid

VAMb blocs EWu

Si Do fon.sauce"m toa d=RwA IrcarVW*",6 we midiwe bf sdoy &Waid prand foslaI -by &*4rimd pecwt* & Mais "rabAW la

- bd tied Ni uin tacalobmfn Wof* ft pusoaldwtft Is oimed? _____

U. Am, ings. Sdoaacr vudmed mid %vvd byew mnm* wR&*Rftfw V Pfog pae on e"00mftr mid -pwid W%" to Ww b*"too

mcw teaw ".zafn?

bmdawwftasot _____W==_ID

Si Do d awoiet S~ antanps r

%Ws~~ prupb. NAM~g lopm m Idw

S. WOW&*~i marms Wa Wdamad detb~ kum?

SEC1TN 5. VUMUAA COWEMEf


EffeItva Date Revisn Supersedes Page No.

10/19/90 1 QM-07-04, Revision 0 28 d 45 QN2-07-04

YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD001PROCEDURE 4/90

rfleQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Dowew Page d_

SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE 114892PROGRAM CHECKLIST FORM PAGE 6 OF 13

STAnlMENT QAI NRMAM TYPEITEM GApPoaRAM EVWALTON CTRIA CtI I 7 - J I ME

7.0 WfNT oF WISEDO UTA. EOLRPMAND SERV

7.1 ft.mauuwu mfihkA*d la Min sx"Waswww_ . . _W _ , _ ____dw .

Lir*am ori few*oaactmiwW 9&nmbwa~tt koe maw h b Li e wf

Sow mta*M " , -sd _!& or d ,wfam

&,ngasi f LWWt w dm3.£n&arni t 61 _od _~o _ary __

Ti f taamn ev M " "km VW 6wquomur

"TL *wiw bcf of bO

7.4 It e wfty "N dfWft "P-SaidwI t Mwfy t apndct fo** u efib arnd&a. sWW&tdardsi Wedkcafwi ff* byt

tivan"Onter t obmwd ft?padiasad u.Liiw w gwviii- q0*. byc

pmaxflwd ioaa"a bn ?ETi ~Liwe &Adiad bOM UM $s~MMwOf Mmi

qu"nW t by of 1 . pratde Waf if1NQ~ MM bY r># OW.P ff4Ogaudble in oft ft wildl &6 adImka~lkso,?

Ti6 1B fifaecowwin d I* nWIE*At byexenem ord w wwn t sauid byte mewo dsligmnat khws a00MMUM it ti wr0oE=mainwhnd wo Weft 61 to Foa i war"?

SECTION 7.0 .uWMARY COMMEWIS

Ul vENFCA'T IC o Com0IR0LCF MMA.A_PARTS A7NOUPO _ __ __

UDo kms a age 4Wtx"Imof ft bm it

Mbneh" " I" iadfwi uia. Wi a~s 1wu ftff

hbdtftn. Mft. MO&IM ,. 00 Of .i mW- r pd 1lne


Effective Date Reviion Supersedes Page No.

10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 29 O 45 |QP_-07-04


riteQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Do=m"w Paos. o -

SUPPUER QUALITY ASSURANCE 1PROGRAM CHECKLIST FORM PAGE 7 OF 13

_TATEUENT 1 P RO TYPE_u CA PROSPAM EVALUAT CAITERUA XAM la 1.COMMENT

h m tm t ioin of w. td Gwasm du D

8.4 mom dc waf Is hifwloq4t we SI-ak dWe. WWMMSt Wad kdSIU. ad NOW

am?

Am wa 5mdonad t seh pa d w %wn Em"dMbd NW w obltmad or kdda by :fwsernt - wefs "so twu mum d Mm!ka-San am AMMV~d

6. Wmn aodc ~dwAw or W-edinwa NS~*wmbftyd ofla*M. WUw a-,fCn I Medfc

bwpornson or as rnswda. b toe paqwan fdsmod ID

EECTIlN 80 SUoMARY COMMENTS

to CONTROLOF SPEOLAL PROOESUS

6.1 Am fmawnelx mbfthed 0 &marne Vt NewPmmms WW" '- , _.Imna*. dmad mwd~rna maS*V as eanls ad Cox&O&W by Omd psrwmd WV 9Aed P=&aim M 4bIS Wm l#obU wnw. sbfd&*.Wodhimionalfth ad stw *du sqrwnkwo

pmatd. pmu W $*YwIt U z rdIm mm

tiwe m wmad o bletd mdu w swdw&. asVs insa#ygi=1mield pwuwmL Pm9&

ECTIDON 9.0 ARYCOUME




I YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4O90


SUPPLIER QUAIT ASSURANCEPROGRAM CHECKLIST FORM PAGE OF 13

_ ~~~~~~~STAIIENT WAW bx 1W1MEM CA PROWRAM EVAUA1ION CAITRMA _ _ -I -= QQ _ COMMENTS

10.0 INSPECTION. _________

1001 Isa rwim, bw bwPecwo 1gMw ffiam giuVea~bl.E d VW xamaJd by of fo to 09I10421Wbew*VQ W* scdl~f b w* zedtwMflW 41 lihed~aanmb kwialiJom. piacidla Cd *avkwQ fwt aewkf 4 t w d81

10.3 a b % *-c -e cnn0 by kdvbnk sle tAnurn. mtw puifmw 39* 1O k-q W~p~7 ______

h. Do sdh rp- if6 rPW1 irely li* wftduawv%= o*ft as mep"Jb 1w " %CA Wft

10 wft zamaor. mrarnt% or bm of mwatsr pmcslc ptccw'd peowformd Ow s&wo&

10A NI di Eprmm"edawtofprou bb~osbb or aazngcu.b hwd id by

W7 E

po3 w o n PD Sn

10.r1 he w odbrwad rma wehb r pmvedctan ryis kadoqAs w.A bo&?

10.6 Wtiu a eaiipis k woeD vef . cceptibbad aVOW E barn. k to =PW"ba p=Womda haed en10. Ynd Spndud I "e wd 1s I P15

WW hdlstalyo s

10.7 .irds" mpecln modib. WU Q*3

nip-Abt wd biwd wicki Mt hdi nomlee

mquhud. we Va eped Ia owa kmasd hIf

10.5 tb e d he P

10CTo 10.0 SaMARY COMMENT_

mq*wed &M b Vi A pub.

70.; lt phi, eu..Wr_ C edradh

fnwm4h*b * p me oevt

11.2 "i SM be*atemu aidW mpiz ub a*#& POW

W -S dv

Iii 0WI _ i balpw b*& a wpis. prod%& oft Vi Mmkilc. prewaprlon %ft Ed

11.1 ww us "1141 "Im F-

d w bm. sYio ad d d E

dtn b ~ ~~~~~~~*


Effective Date Revision Supesedes I Page No.

10/19/90 1 | QMP-07-04, Revision 0 31 O 45 QMP-07-04



Counmw Past*_ d _SUPPLIER QUALUTY ASSURANCE149-

PROGRAM CHECKLIST FOM PAGE g OF 13

ITEM CA PROGRAM EVALUATION CRITERMA TATEf -I -U -= 4 CMENTS

11.d ft adpoodwN b1~d po.~is bf 80urqi Iiii Faweqtds b t Otle as~ km b1W1w WOK Oluedsq*b UK wwwwnsnucn Is wmhh md used

Sinn41y"" "~~~~~~~4111U

S st mW&T MNb 82w

naideS ipefiu uw idh ps i**-ogimrE

11.5 he SN h5"d ioaine raid W~ub salxVia" Ilt I"m"f h"ae 11

SECTION 110 SUMMARY COMMENSE:

12.0 CONTOL Of EASURIG AN TEST EQLPMENT

12.1 k~ messes. esU tm beSi at efd, g4,ehew In d set r ra9*4 NS #M p ea

used hi*wW wid qiulty S p" wat.ogizd dfd t d 4d ttt ided

t2 hsukhm~ayidtm eniay vi.

12. b heias d

*2J III. be V of m dni. Is d eg ib at m n t e Wad O ofd "t w- W

12.3 n SW d faasomwooSt f OWN melit Mbat2 %4d e veidw %00 mb ke_ _ _

_ eiped En #? ________12.4 Is bsesckm M1eev1104 wOrit sOM puien WsuY

b.ad lo e As raftn ulaft mpsied or Okod?

i2.5 Are moods arm~eth and fsumed aitbly maVud

SECTION 12.0 SUMMARY COMMENTS:


Effectve Date Revision Supersedes age No.

10/19/90 1 | QMP-07-04, Revision 0 32 d 45 |QP07-04

' YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4/90

iT


OouW Pago- d

SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE II-"8"2PROGRAM CHIECKLIST FORM PAGE 10 OF 13

STATEMENT OUAXY PFGRAM TYKTEM CA PROGRAM SYALUAT10U CRITERIA 1 0 t I -_4 C- MYENTS

_ 3 OUANIDU. STOAAGE AND SU4P__

131kuaaewbhd^w(1 hk~b '._am". wiwv. dw I and PIn d sOrd SqtUmm-t ard affv4 hI rdanc wM k

Ordbu; F c bwVftwDwvr~fO

13.2 Wan msary bp pod V a eAf dro mnb, wd kinn Du arsoaw,

sef fdfedwre ambr Is _d _evrlr _w

13.3 Are Woos Iwf IWAb Ord 2QWiPmet b d WAI&Md In WwdtCs WM U0 P*Mdyft EdoodItd *Msa W mwty 2W Si b*b Ord ***w*M

12.4 k r0 *" of NOWhiciu br hMIL d bdq bc"=

_ mn Ed~ _tq _ _ _ _

13. u5 i ad.Hequt al.bib n~d reto rt n hbon r Si w d

SECtUM 130 SUMMARY COMMENI:

1%0 SbSPECT1CN, TEST ANO OPERATN STATUS

14.1 kA maures sxdW b - I NO

Otte milUbg ffau. Si Mat of inm~we Edb

I" eawad urPonkvi

dim wae sawomtdU Passed ma*gOd mapeeftiEd ju., wliai bamawy t pudi& b*Mnmmt".wM such kwpKsm Ed SM7

143 kAr masum *#eaMkhd S Wd to OFr~

bpI dbnw autde BabyWheu-aE s

t4S O~~~bsb~~dsh

13.4 W ofU.bdr"a umim Wd O .SECTO N US SUMMAR Y _Ed__UC S 1. UW~AYCUET

Figure 3. Sample Supplier QA Program-Checklist (continued).


10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 33 Of 45 "Q-07-04



OOAne Pag- d

SUPPLIER mUALry ASSURANCE 1¶.Ug-2PROGRAM CHECKUST FORM PAGE II OF 13

STATWENT 0UAWY P AM TYPEITE GA PROGAM 1EVAUATON CITERA -SJCATCI I _ I _ I COMME-

5.O N0OCONFORMING MATEIAL PARS OR_COMPONEMT

15.1 kDie muwul u "MDii m-~ mabErdin.pober0nvaienm (wt ar wtWE)esf bdio o

miwim w .qihum hi re m ~ewriwwrrl we ar httatn?

15.1 De 0at wwua hOJude maprvaw, pvapambtUfl. 1 *abon, ugmgaft%dffullon a nof~on ft ftecbd ugalzelons?

I"i A* "md~ar" %MRS mew Wd AcepAld.mlecad. .parod or uoukad in wwrdenm vedoaauiunod groedowu?

15. Are me MaonUty aM UJ6*tft gw to isposil des VnwGbn dan iedl d

d- mmie gwad~ dI

155 Am mevrhd d wad bmns mkaped hinI atdar wft opkbh Wrcend?

151.6 Ars mesaus vddd _alki _wies. _ _ryr hbisalan d a mmn rdwior wdsecs Nam

paoig a dedabn an bf Ifpoein ablahed tnd

%L7 Do eih mmaMt mqib jcjnnfban stft li_

isow @1 lw or Ind - i?

am Wen aw"W doaa'Urid hi Mwd fte Ww"ig_ d denetieeWal Ea _oN? _156* am egsieahd e __uwi bn maa

m_ m rapi t hi pwoeW _____-

SECTrI 15 S0WMAIY COMIMENTS

16.0 COIRECTNEACrTi_

16.? Au n " W F eua _hbbe _i _a'ltmdi_ &Ml* la *Wft _.Cf a&5uI. _ _ d_ 1.

100aciH je 1lca. d fel atiiid ai

16. If"adffmowt m 10*01f..

lewand aid -wiof a "Mm. eNW Ey

no IO OE " MP~E:P

Iwf of ameaffoewv ememe m


Effective Date Revision Supersedes Page NO

10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 34 d 45 QMP-07-04

YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-ADPROCEDURE 4

TrdeQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

DocmwiPags....

SUPPUER QUALITY ASSURANCE 11-89-2PROGRAM CHECKLIST FORM PAGE 12 OF 13

STATEMENT WUALITYPAWRAMMITEM CA PRORAM EVAWA7N CWITEA OCATUl _I -- C__ENTS

s7] at ~__ 1_L_ 1__

it1 @UALITY ASSURANECE RECORCS

It1 Are wf~dwt owrds m~WA"" biiI knk g~w=IN~

r.d- _ _ _ _

TM mo~rdng "g bK~h 9 bW f ftfw.u

*. bocnf __ _ _ _

a. Than

d. ALb.

_. MoinItig * !wtu~u _____________

.. Mah

17.2 Do nam*h& bidu ~al lIWd dab Axf a*a n -at.

4. PaisdwgE_S. Pfomdiama

a. TM bSPOC r SdM mordM?

'TMe we'esi t_____

V*. : 1 owN. maibmtd

I. TM e* eombblor? N

.7. A myhe iftW~bW, W~dmu

_ ore _ab _d _ but?17.4 Ame m*wdsWftNeI kM - uisabiw.?

L Lthic aid a~id owi

S. Cceabm if W9~ and" Mi eUWdb.7

d. A £la Udd a I9MUf inw 0I ) _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

17.7 Am ort mw#a tod Sed~ Mwf Old *a bw

midipA i by u or Obe pwet db? dl i ~

&ECTU417 IS UMMARY COMMENTSI


Effectve Date Revisfon Supersedes Page No.



Tite- QMP-07-04, REVISION 1

- SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Ooatms Page. d

SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE II.-""-PROGRAM CHECKLIST FORM PAGE 13 OF 13

STAEUT JWAUrtf 0PCOR 1WEITEM CA PPMRPA EVALUATh COMEA CA cow _ -C__MENT

Ito 5sJCM~

1L1 Is a swrirmnah% syibm ofI ib rd a Wa ,h mat b

IL Vely ewvtwea smm" d tA QA

. SOui. tw .ffc. of gto pIgum

I8.2 ko miia awduaMd Pm~doi a o a mftf.wwdad~ied basis. boat? Am asilt owxdg e r - mm o offlc*d or W&A" ~

. ^ afl awwd of - -0wkmh

a tha ow aamaa wowtk oftiw *i a miuam PetFlflc a it snwiap a~U

dew tw " wntmet patems uwowfsew asr deMod In IN*~ Qu iIC III. t-wwn de I. 00ft. owgv's u

Ift" WWIU dIqu Vs made "

womn' tat so wft wgww= m¶ S p5bdi e

beecloM U dahf"yW" we aSMe eI

~AwItIt *4V*ab. a0 IS. -~td aM

dosa VW w&Ko i t ift800?

maffa etass o Umiu Oak or bA II

4. Wwvd momsawy?~~ay ubai

"Urn,',l __________

I.VAn ictsnaa waidwe am y fa w* W*&of -a, _ __ _ NW

IWise W haldftd MuWyMs t 3IsIk e

ase mquh wiactke NWI o&.1

II) Di. dS aeleasd wi wam faeuk

d now 4W"w Kotsad

Cou nwobl deaIxstw SvMp ymw Isln

p" gis ml I*g a faaWAai IN

bw ddi ___ __

ISV bke seied I "a o*fme _ _ _

tea *0 . M. ais U e Idedmt aadIElC I" -MSIA" seo a _ _mod3. d -dsiedsa maa y iB

Uhf ^_IUO d WI tW 7

St C_ td aeswa_ _ _ _ _ .


Effectve Date Reon Supersedes Pae NO.

10/19/90 1 QP-07-04, Revision 0 36 o 45 QMP-07-04

'-. YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-ADPROCEDURE 4/90

riteQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

CocuranM Page.. of

SUPPUER QUALITY ASSURANCE 11-6-69-3PROGRAM CHECKLIST SUPPLEMENT FORM PAGE 2 OF 2

FOR CAUBRATION SYSTEMSITEM CA PROGRAM EVALUTiON CRTERA STATWOO UXAM ci

C. Cent* or 1 U j of Abf qd -OWn0 ba_ bMbn 64 amu&W t ,w4MxWd h wuvMIW?

T C&ATION PTERVMLS. DOES TNE COTMtTORSPROCEDUPE PRaViE FOM,

a C flo d ,MTE nd .IuuwCmevt uan s£ pNowvak?

b. abmm.Wo aft e -afln 6wi Fe based citaby. I hnS Ma h9 of ta"?

6. , Awie a~t ahbi htwv£ par wtt .dm bprslow mobumion mmjlb?

t madioiy ow of MAN &V wwuhnb?

* CAUBRATION PROCEDURE. CO CALURAIMN PbXE-OURES PWOVIDE FOR:

L PvnWIOn. pwloan. WAd z£Ioi Ot wrtan pWcM brtb aMniw on MATE ad Iwanlme --d?

C. Raqusi br abbi toe p6wp4d by asnet as

L a.InU~on of p*kwd Eandwd POMe Or Ra~s~twbwMfb 1m ai?


Effedve Date Revison Supersedes Page No.

10/19/90 1 Q-P-07-04, Revision 0 38 ° 45 QME-07-04

i YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 4190

1-It,.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Docwnt Po ofd

OUAMTY ASSURANCE 114896DOCUMENTATION APPROVAL SHEET FORM PAGE I OF I

P.O. NOJCONTRACT SPEC. NO. FLE NO. DATE

DISTRUTION MADE TO.

n o I d b b an.

I n 3 WIPob Im us e.smt

APPROVAL STATUSDOCUMENT REVISION DESCRPTION (Sm &.goW Abo-)

1 2 3

APPROVED BY: APPROVAL DATE:

Figure 4. Sample QA Documentation Approval Sheet.

10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 39 f 45 QMP-07-04


rTitQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Department of EnergyW06aI owegols offce a

P a onx 13511Lo WVOWs V 391934518 EISA

V0,,1- ;s990

John I. NelsonSechnical Project Officer for Yucc Maintain ProjectScience Applications Iternational Corporationthe valley Bank Center, Suite 407101 Convention Center DriveLas Vegas, N 09109

oPLIlFED SPPLIIRS LIST (QSL)* IEvlSICR 2, APRIL 1990

me enclosed OSL contains those suppliers that ve been evaluated by QualityAssuanCt ICA) and found to be acceptable for procuremnt of item or servicesaffecting quality.

Revision 2 of the QS1 incorporates Change Notices 1 through A for ruVlieraqualified during the first quarter of 1990.

procurement all be limited to the C6L Wlliers at the locations noted forthe products or services specified. In te event restcletion apply, % willspjcify alternate mthods to caensate for supplier program deficiencies,I.e., earce srwveillance. testing after teceipt, en calibration by anapproved soure. etc.

g51L Cover page chang notices will be generated to team or incoporate uwvpproved vuppliers to the 05L as sutppiers are evaluated and pproved a an

interim wasre umtil the 061 Is revised.

If yu have aNy qstiUS, please contact Jams 3laylock of my staff at1944913.

Denuld G. Borton, VinctorQuality Assurance

Ygsa-3223 nrca mountain Projfct Office

fzclosure:06L. sevision 2

Figure 5. Sample QSL Transmittal Letter and QSL forms.

Effectve Date Revision Supersedes |pae No.

10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 40 f 45 |Q -P07-04

r

I YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE 429O

TWOQMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

MMn B. INlsn -2- MAY 01 199

Cc:Ralph Stain. 0 1-30) fCW0. C. Shelor, 0 (3W-3) MRISJ. W. Gilray, nC, Lus Veg"as, NVD. J. Harris. Harz, Las Vegas, W, S1/1 S- 4W. D. tiviln. SUC, Las Vegas. WV S17/-04N. N. ussman, SJUC. Las VegasY, UY S17/-11J. S. Harper, SUC. Las Vegas, NW S17/T-38C. B. Prater, SAC, Las Vegas, WV, S17/1-06J. C. Vinaer, SUC. Las Vegas. W, S17,-15J. R. Statler, SUC, Las Vegas. WN, 517?-02C. T. Taylor. SC. a Vegas, Mt, S17/T-22J. E. terieni, LUC. s Vegas, N, S171-40J. S. Treadwell, SAIC, s V"eas, NW, S17,7-17

V. Voegele, SPlC. Uas Vegas. NV, 517/A-03s. v. woolfolk. LUC, tas Vegas, NW, S171-29R. J. aorich, Las Vagas W, 517/1-7

Figure 5. Sample QSL Transmittal Letter and QSL forms. (continued)

Effective Date Revision Supersedes Page - No.


,A

YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD1PROCEDURE 4/90


amimu LIrm ST (O00me IM/90*-1

vznmAi 2, AUL 190

SOIM mm_

M=w01AW

AM ACd uc'S W

2M CIRM Mimmi aGTS, 1.

60005-4692

CLTRMNCS aCw140 WIl2 FLCinu,. aI 11116

EX.

45750

M.2411 34 ?MBW Ml93940

uOIMM rSY.

; ,Z a OMMSCN23= I

WM. SWYIC=a CMES - C~MTim a nwWa

50I U=6. SO-UTIO

StWIZESVLrATIGM a

CAMAn= I

CALELMC Qr HSS

mrT a U=LaSIS

ERADION SEVIE

ama. sNM a WTWIS

uIA -/-12/92 13

1112/19/U

U/A 3/A -/-3/93 4 MV aU/A

msmNamy xnasa00OMR oEzFC~

-/-1193 4 uIAuA

u/A N/A -/-2/33 1 WA2 010/67

rO =M DOWN= 10

IMeu7m WflZOWITM 0srECan cI 3E

D6

-/-12/92 1 *02 71/98

1 10CY990-62 fth-1

3 mlS a 45.24 C36074CIAI,


Efeceve Date Revision Supersedes PaR o to.

10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 42 Of 45 IM-07-04

YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-001PROCEDURE "O

QWP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

calW" Sapp= Lin3r .APo-rw5szm 2, Aww. 1190

SU1LU Wi VICO= Uv=JI1 0% 2L_ mvzsz

as, -. .- 9-xw WI WLEl

M s-3ZCMAN. VA.19352

55-C RMWLA m". VM

6S9s

3DGL 5.w

m. D.0-

9C= r INTDu1NI £ XaMCKs

50 W

uA 01/92-.4/1 2 Ua7/21/81

U/ARL

rrO

12/ W122 4 el12/1J8/

Bk IN. wvs, wALM2883 D SYAL MM UC 3DI0=XlCIL SM,

uw n, IN 47502 AM C =s

*A K/A 021-2/93 4 WV 541d6I 0

nFM Cns:I 19=5O-62 M-1

a Awl 3 45.28 LoHEC



10/19/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 43 O 45 |QMP-07-04

. YUCCA-MOUNTAIN PROJECT - Y-AD-WOPROCEDURE 4/90

rut'QMP-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Documft Page.. d

QUALFIED SUPPUER(S) UST 1148"9COVER PAGE HANGE NOTCE FORM PAGE I OF I

CSL REVISION CHANGE NOTICE EFFECTIVE DATE

NUMBER YEAR .- NUBJER YEAR

SUPPLIER NAMEJADDRESS CONTACT NAUEjInTLE

Su TELEPHONEP

L SPECIFICATION SCOPE SERVICE

A

O COOESJSTD COMM___D TO IN OA MANUAL:

010CQRS0B O NIAi13 OAHsi-w4s2

0 0 COMMERCIAL____________

00

A CHANGE NOTICE:CT 0 INCORPORAION CF NEW SUtPPLER TO THE OSL

O O REMOVE SUPPUER FROM OSLN

R LIMITATIONS, SUPPLIER VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES OR DOCUMENTED COMMITMENTSE

TR

T

IN

s ~C^oneadDAI

A

K-8 CowivedO

A 0 QUAIFID

O QUAoFIED WllH REEVAWATION DUE DATE AUDIT ME DATEV RESTRICTION

A 0MCT0FkC UV

Figure 6. Sample QSL Cover Page/Change Notice.



YUCCA MOUNTAIN PROJECT Y-AD-OD1PROCEDURE 4/90

r-iteQM2-07-04, REVISION 1SUPPLIER EVALUATION/QUALIFIED SUPPLIERS LIST

Docummnw Papge dQUALIFIED SUPPLIERS UIST su-

DELETION NOTICE FORM PAGE I OF I

WUPPtER IIAIE:

SUPPLIER AD0RESS.' SERVMC SCOPE-

BASIS FM OELETION:

_VALUAT T DATE:

DISTRIBUIOfON:

O3c cNAL REou>RJE

F 7RE.IOUS SWPIDER USERS

TME ABIOVE REFERENCED SWPULIER IS SCHEWULED TO EEDELETED IRO r#4E COLONppOA wRammTE J~qAWZION PRIOR TO THIS DATE SHUD CNTIUD MANEAC OFTHS SUPIR BE RR

J USFI CAT ION :

SINATUJRE. | OA

O3 APfflOVE

O aSAPPD4 O0lECKCOUALM ASSRAC SDn- a

Figure 7. Sample QSL Deletion Notice.

Effeebw Date Revision Supersedes Page No.

10Jl9/90 1 QMP-07-04, Revision 0 45 Of 45 QM"-07-04