25
150 Cross Street Akron, Ohio 44311 www.cssbh.org 2016 Annual Report Quality Improvement and Compliance

Quality Improvement and Compliance 2016 Annual Report...Intake workers conduct Clinical Evaluation Assessment interviews with persons referred for public mental health treatment. Intake

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 150 Cross Street Akron, Ohio 44311

    www.cssbh.org

    2016 Annual

    Report

    Quality Improvement and Compliance

  • Quality Improvement and Compliance 2016 Summary

    Community Support Services, Inc. serves as the premiere non-profit behavioral healthcare provider for Summit County and the surrounding communities. The agency offers a comprehensive array of holistic services to promote wellness for persons with severe and persistent mental illnesses.

    The Quality Improvement and Compliance (QIC) Annual Report is presented to stakeholders of Community Support Services, Inc. in an effort to demonstrate excellence in service provision as a result of continuous performance monitoring and quality improvement.

    The QIC Annual report has been designed to provide a snapshot of services and programs offered in 2016, while providing a summary of Quality Improvement initiatives and reported measures for the year. The QIC Annual Report highlights our efforts and demonstrates the agency’s progress in meeting QIC expectations and best practices during the year.

    During the year, the agency embarked on an initiative to provide services coupled with the Trauma Informed Care Model to increase effectiveness of all program services. Moving forward to 2017, continued implementation of Trauma Informed Care practices and a Zero Suicide initiative, will lead to improved client satisfaction and client outcomes agency wide.

    Additionally, Quality Improvement (QI) has made efforts to collaborate with Information Technology Services to streamline QI indicators and program service reviews to continue improving efficiency in the monitoring process while incorporating data collection for Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS), Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), and Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA). Further adoption of these measures in 2017 will lead to better continuity of care among Primary and Behavioral Health Care services.

    TA B L E OF C ONTENTS :

    I. PROGRAMS & SERVICES

    CPST & Specialized Services

    Forensic & Employment

    Rehabilitative Services

    Residential Services

    Client Advocacy

    II. QUALITY IMPROVEMENT &

    COMPLIANCE (QIC) COMMITTEE

    2016 REPORTED INDICATORS

    QIC SUB-COMMITTEES

    III. WHO WE SERVE

    AGENCY CASELOAD

    SERVICE PROVISION & AGENCY STAFF

    MENTAL HEALTH DIAGNOSIS

    CLIENT DEMOGRAPHICS

    IV. 2016 QUALITY

    IMPROVEMENT & COMPLIANCE SUMMARY

    V. IN THE COMMUNITY

  • Programs and Services

    Page 1

    Figure 2. Distribution of Specialty CPST

    Team’s caseload. (December 31, 2016)

    Figure 1. Distribution of the agency CPST

    caseload according to Program CPST

    service. (December 31, 2016)

    Forensic

    4%

    Regional

    66.7%

    Specialty

    25.3%

    Homeless

    4%

    CPST Services By Program

    COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRIC SUPPORTIVE TREATMENT (CPST) AND SPECIALIZED

    SERVICES

    Community Psychiatric Supportive Treatment (CPST) (Group and Individual Treatment) provides clients

    with Individualized Service Plans including interventions

    that address daily living skills, resource acquisition,

    medication management, etc. Community

    Rehabilitation Specialists (CRS) advocate and support

    the client in their recovery by coordinating care to

    achieve the most effective outcomes. Regional

    treatment team caseloads are based on client’s

    geographic location (see Figure 1).

    Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) services are provided by the Assertive Community Treatment Team to clients with more intensive needs requiring frequent community contact to maintain stability and by the Intensive Treatment Team (ITT) to clients that are

    younger adults (see Figure 2).

    Substance Abuse and Mental Illness Program of ACT

    (SAMI-PACT) provides wrap-around services for persons

    with significant mental health and substance use

    concerns; the agency implements the principles of the Integrated Dual Diagnosis Treatment (IDDT)

    model. This evidence based practice employs motivational interviewing techniques and a stage of

    change model to provide community-based services to

    address the unique needs of persons with severe

    mental illnesses and significant substance use disorders

    (see Figure 2).

    Geriatric and Long Term Care team strives to ensure the

    highest quality of life for the older adult. The

    specialized team includes Community Rehabilitation

    Specialists, Geriatric Psychiatrists, Advanced Practical

    Nurse and a Long-Term Care Services Administrator.

    Comprehensive treatment and mental health

    evaluations are provided for persons living in the

    community and/or residing in extended care facilities.

    The team utilizes a treatment approach based on the

    strengths and needs of the individual while encouraging

    family involvement in their loved one’s treatment (see Figure 2).

    ITT 13%

    SAMI 15%

    ACT 15%

    GER 36%

    ENG 12%

    Specialized Team's Case Load

  • Programs and Services

    Page 2

    Engagement Service Specialists provide outreach CPST using various resources to locate and engage

    clients who have not consistently participated in treatment. Once re-engaged, clients learn to minimize

    treatment barriers in order to transition to traditional CPST and psychiatry services.

    HOME Choice, is a program provided by the Geriatric team. A Transition Coordinator assists eligible

    older adults and persons with disabilities in the transition

    from a facility-based placement to a home in the community.

    Supports include locating housing, coordinating benefits, and

    obtaining referrals for additional supports and services to

    ensure a successful transition into the community.

    SSI Project provides service to individuals through trained staff members who have extensive knowledge

    of the benefit application process. The goals of the program are to expedite the SSI (Supplemental

    Security Income) and SSDI (Social Security Disability Insurance) application process, reduce barriers and

    increase the number of disabled adults receiving SSI/SSDI benefits for the first time.

    Liaison workers provide Community Psychiatric Supportive Treatment for persons receiving behavioral

    health services at Portage Path Behavioral Health.

    Representative Payee services assist individuals who are financially negatively impacted by symptoms of

    their mental illness to manage their funds. Clients who are at risk of losing housing, utilities and other

    basic needs can elect to have Community Support Services designated as their representative payee for

    Social Security benefits in order to maintain independent living.

    Intake workers conduct Clinical Evaluation Assessment interviews with persons referred for public

    mental health treatment. Intake workers determine a person’s eligibility to receive services at either

    Community Support Services, Inc. or at Portage Path Behavioral Health.

    Assessment specialists provide the initial contact with the agency after referral from Adult Mental

    Health Admissions. Through an in-depth assessment, specialists determine the unique strengths, needs,

    abilities and preferences of each consumer in an effort to link them to appropriate agency programs and

    services, and other community based resources.

    FORENSIC AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES

    Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) is an ACT team designed to service individuals who have

    severe and persistent mental illnesses with psychosis, extensive criminal history, and a current

    misdemeanor charge, Persons eligible for FACT services are court ordered to participate in the program.

    Persons with sexual offenses and/or persons designated as a registered sex offender are not eligible for

    the program. Persons referred to FACT must be assessed by the FACT team to determine eligibility prior

    to the court ordering the person to FACT.

    Forensic and Mental Health Court (MHC) teams specialize in serving clients involved with the criminal

    justice system (see Figure 3). Forensic Services are provided to clients deemed “Incompetent to Stand

    Trial” and continues throughout the inpatient competency restoration process and to clients who are

    found “Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity”, supporting clients during Conditional Release. The MHC team

    Home Choice Services 2016

    Number of Individuals Served: 37

  • Programs and Services

    Page 3

    RHO 13%

    Fact 28%

    MHC 22%

    Conditional

    Release 33%

    All Other

    Forensic

    3.8%

    Forensic Caseload

    Figure 3. Distribution of the Forensic CPST Team’s

    caseload. (December 31, 2016)

    provides service to individuals facing qualifying misdemeanor charges in Akron, Stow and Barberton

    Courts.

    Returning Home Ohio (RHO) is a permanent

    supportive housing program that targets

    offenders released from the Ohio Department

    of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) state

    institutions who are identified as homeless or at

    risk of homelessness upon release and fall into

    one of 2 categories: 1) Severe and persistent

    mental illness (SPMI) with or without a co-

    occurring disorder; 2) HIV with or without a

    SPMI. RHO is a collaborative program with

    ODRC and Corporation for Supportive Housing

    (CSH) created to prevent homelessness and

    reduce recidivism in this population. RHO offers

    a cost effective combination of safe, affordable

    housing with a range of supportive services that

    helps participants live stable, independent and healthy lives. Linkages and partnerships with local

    resources and community organizations provide additional options for services and continued rental

    subsidy which are essential to the program.

    Referrals can be accepted for an offender up to 120 days post release. Priority is given to offenders

    identified as being most likely to require supportive services in order to maintain housing and stability.

    Referrals are also accepted from community providers such as homeless shelters, Projects for Assistance

    in Transition from Homelessness (PATH) teams and halfway houses.

    Crisis Intervention (CIT) provides immediate intervention for individuals who may be experiencing acute

    mental health symptoms. CIT staff works with Sherriff’s Deputies and Police Officers from local

    communities to intervene and promote mental health treatment.

    Vocational and Employment services help to identify career interests as well as barriers to employment. The program(s) focuses on helping individuals secure and retain employment. Referrals are accepted from Community Support Services, Child Guidance & Family Solutions, Community Health Center, and Portage Path Behavioral Health.

    Supported Employment (SE), an evidence-based practice, emphasizes consumer preferences, rapid job search and placement, integration with mental health services, benefits advocacy, and time-unlimited supports to help persons with mental illness find competitive jobs in the community. Consistently, research has demonstrated Supported Employment programs are effective in helping individuals with severe and persistent mental illnesses secure and retain employment.

    Supported Employment offers guidance through all phases of the process of obtaining employment; discussion of work-readiness, benefits planning, assessment of interests, job search support, resume writing, application assistance, interviewing, and job coaching follow-along support at the job site.

    Supported Employment 2016

    Number of New Job Starts: 84

  • Programs and Services

    Page 4

    GroupHomes

    SafeHavens

    Vet SafeHaven

    MadalinePark I

    MadelinePark II

    N.CoastApts

    2016 Census based on MaxCapacity

    81% 97% 76% 97% 97% 99%

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    Residential Services and Housing Facilties

    Figure 4. Residential Services; Residential/Group Home Treatment,

    Supportive and Independent living facility’s census (December 31, 2016).

    REHABILITATIVE SERVICES

    The Medication Clinic serves clients who are prescribed injectable psychiatric medications. Clinicians are

    specially trained to address pharmacological issues and guide clients through Ohio’s Central Pharmacy

    and other patient assistance programs to ensure continued availability of medications.

    Pharmacological Management is comprised of community and clinic nursing, psychology, inpatient and

    outpatient psychiatry, and medication prescribing and monitoring.

    The Margaret Clark Morgan Integrated Care Clinic offers clients physical healthcare and preventive

    screenings. A clinic, laboratory and Klein’s Pharmacy comprise the Primary Care Clinic. The staff

    includes a physician, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, podiatrist, medical assistants and dietician.

    The Primary Care Clinic has served as a training site for nursing and other healthcare related students

    and has formed many collaborative efforts with the Summit County Health Department to provide

    comprehensive health services to our consumers.

    Health and Wellness Services are provided under a Substance Abuse Mental Health Services

    Administration (SAMHSA) grant and focuses on the integration of primary and behavioral health while

    emphasizing wellness. Available on-site is yoga, smoking cessation, health and wellness education, and a

    dietician. Additionally, Recovery Specialists work with clients at the YMCA three days a week and end

    the week with a Walk with a Doc©.

    RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

    Residential Services

    includes Group Home,

    Supportive and

    independent living

    facilities (see Figure 4

    for 2016 Census).

    Residential Services

    also assists individuals

    with placement into

    proprietary group

    homes and offers

    Housing Assistance and

    Loan Assistance

    Programs (HAP & LAP).

    Homeless Outreach

    identifies and engages homeless individuals who may benefit from mental health treatment. The

    Homeless Outreach Team works with clients in referral status until they are determined eligible for

    active agency services and ready to transition to traditional CPST teams or are linked to other treatment

    options (see Figure 5).

    Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) is a grant funded program by the U.S. Department of

    Veteran Affairs. Outreach efforts, case management services and assistance in obtaining benefits are

  • Programs and Services

    Page 5

    Figure 5. Client’s agency status for

    Homeless Outreach’s caseload. (December

    31, 2016)

    provided by the Homeless Outreach team to Veteran families that without assistance would likely be

    homeless.

    In 2015, The Veteran’s Safe Haven was opened, a

    Housing First program aimed to provide housing and

    stabilize veterans who are Chronically Homeless with

    Severe and Persistent Mental Illness. The ultimate goal

    of this program is to link program participants to

    permanent housing and services. All program

    participants must be Veterans who were honorably

    discharged and have a severe and persistent mental

    illness.

    Cooperative Agreement to Benefit Homeless Individuals (CABHI)-is a new program service offered by the Homeless Outreach team in 2014. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) funds the program with a goal of enhancing and/or increasing critical services for chronically homeless individuals with substance use disorders, serious mental illness and those with co-occurring substance use and mental illnesses. Services are provided to help individuals access permanent housing, benefits, comprehensive treatment and recovery oriented supports.

    Intensive Treatment Services offer an array of recovery-based therapies including group sessions that provide psycho-education and promote the development of social skills, functional abilities, coping mechanisms and other tools that enhance independence.

    Art Therapy uses the art media, the creative process, and the resulting artwork to explore feelings, reconcile emotional conflicts, foster self-awareness, manage behavior and addictions, develop social

    skills, improve reality orientation, reduce anxiety, and increase self-esteem. Art therapy may be offered in group and individual formats.

    The overall aim of art therapists is to enable a client to effect change and growth on a personal level through the use of art materials in a safe and facilitating environment through individual and/or group sessions.

    Individual and Group Counseling sessions, led by licensed clinicians, provide more in-depth and focused attention on unique issues. Counseling often is provided over a shorter term to address temporary concerns and crises.

    Art Therapy Services 2016

    Number of Individuals Served: 35

    Referral

    77%

    Active

    23%

    Homeless Outreach Case Status

  • Programs and Services

    Page 6

    Table 2. Grievances/Complaints by

    Subject/Department (2016-2014)

    Resolutions 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

    Explanation Given 103 107 112 110 Referral Made 2 1 0 2 Treatment Revised 16 29 24 20 Staff Correction/Discipline 1 3 2 3 Policy Recommendation 0 1 1 0 Withdrawn/No Response 19 10 8 9

    Total 141 151 147 144 Table 2. Grievances/Complaints by Resolution

    2014-2010

    Table 1. Grievances/Complaints by

    Source 2016-2014

    Table 3. Resolutions (2016-2014)

    Resolutions 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

    Explanation Given 103 107 112 110 Referral Made 2 1 0 2 Treatment Revised 16 29 24 20 Staff Correction/Discipline 1 3 2 3 Policy Recommendation 0 1 1 0 Withdrawn/No Response 19 10 8 9

    Total 141 151 147 144 Table 2. Grievances/Complaints by

    Resolution 2014-2010

    CLIENT RIGHTS AND ADVOCACY

    One hundred twenty-eight (144) complaints were filed in 2016 (see Table 1). There has been a significant

    increase in the number of grievances filed by Client and Family since last year as well as an increase

    grievances related to Payee ship and financial matters.

    As complaints regarding payee ship and financial

    issues increased during 2016 it was noted that

    changes in payee/finance processes and

    department staffing were suspected reasons for

    the increase. The payee staffing has stabilized and

    a reduction in these types of complaints are expected for 2017. Also noted, it is often a challenge to

    differentiate between payee and Community Rehabilitation Specialist complaints. This is due to the

    perception of the source.

    SUBJECT / DEPARTMENT

    2016 2015 2014

    Another Client 4 1 1 CPST 49 55 30

    Payee/Finance 55 28 41 Pharm Mgmt. 11 8 11

    Front Desk/Support 3 0 2 Residential 6 3 9 Vocational 0 0 1

    Whole Agency 3 2 1 Outside 1 0 9

    Homeless Outreach 3 1 7 Counseling 0 2 1

    Billing 0 4 0 Other 9 9 15

    Total 144 113 128

    ORIGINATION SOURCE

    2016 2015 2014

    Client 126 103 122 Family 13 5 0

    Ohio Legal Rights 0 0 0 Other Agency 3 1 1

    ADM Board 0 0 0 Primary Care Clinic 0 NR NR

    CSS Staff 2 4 5 Total 144 113 128

    RESOLUTIONS

    2016 2015 2014

    Explanation Given 117 90 101 Referral Made 1 0 0 Treatment Revised 10 17 19 Staff Correction/Discipline 3 1 1 Policy Recommendation 0 0 1 Withdrawn/No Response 14 5 6

    Total 145 113 128

  • Quality Improvement and Compliance - 2016

    Page 7

    Figure 6. Quality Improvement Plan Indicators

    2016-2014

    Figure 5. 2014 PI Plan Indicators

    Table 4. PI Plan Indicator by key area category as: Reported, Deferred or Under Development in

    2016 (some indicators measure more than one key area and/or were reported more than once)

    Table 4. PI Plan Indicator by key area category as: Reported, Deferred or Under Development in

    2014

    *Some Indicators deferred during 2016 are under consideration for removal/revision in 2017

    The QUALITY IMPROVEMENT & COMPLIANCE program has been established by the Board of Directors.

    The policies of the Board authorize the Chief

    Executive Officer to establish a QUALITY

    IMPROVEMENT & COMPLIANCE Program and an

    Agency wide QUALITY IMPROVEMENT &

    COMPLIANCE Committee.

    The purpose of the Quality Improvement and

    Compliance Program is to continually monitor and

    evaluate the quality and appropriateness of clinical,

    administrative and support services provided by

    Community Support Services, Inc. These efforts

    ensure that effective, efficient and high quality care

    is delivered to individuals served by the agency.

    2016 REPORTED INDICATORS

    To determine and evaluate important aspects of clinical care one-hundred and thirty-nine (139)

    outcome indicators were reviewed by the QUALITY IMPROVEMENT & COMPLIANCE Committee in 2016

    (see Figure 6).

    Analysis of these indicators affords the QUALITY IMPROVEMENT & COMPLIANCE committee the

    opportunity to assess risk, identify potential problems and identify areas requiring or showing

    improvement. To stay on target, the QUALITY IMPROVEMENT & COMPLIANCE Committee constantly

    monitors and assesses performance against a series of indicators and goals. Indicators are based on

    service delivery performance and are categorized in four key areas: Effectiveness, Efficiency,

    Accessibility and Satisfaction (see Table 4).

    Indicator Category

    Total Number Reported to

    QUALITY IMPROVEMENT & COMPLIANCE

    *Number of Indicators Deferred

    Number of Indicators Under Development

    Efficiency 28 6 3

    Effectiveness 79 3 4

    Accessibility 26 0 2 Satisfaction 7 2 0 Peer Review 4 0 1

    Target/Compliance 4 0 0

    Total 139 11 10

    0306090

    120150180

    PIC Reviewed Deferred UnderDevelopment

    Quality Improvement Plan Indicators

    2016 Indicators

    2015 Indicators

    2014 Indicators

  • Quality Improvement and Compliance - 2016

    Page 8

    Effective 31%

    Efficient 4.8%

    Accessibility

    14.3%

    Satisfaction

    4.8%

    2016 Improvement by CARF Standard

    Figure 7. Reported Quality Improvement by Quarter

    2016

    Figure 6. 2014 Reported Quality Improvement by

    Quarter

    Figure 8. Reported Quality Improvement by

    CARF Standard 2016

    Figure 7. 2014 Reported Quality

    Improvement by CARF Standard

    3 2 2

    28

    14

    10

    16

    9

    2 4 3 4 2 1

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    100% 90-99% 80-89% Below 80%

    Reported Indicators by Threshold Range

    Efficiency

    Effectiveness

    Accessibility

    Satisfaction

    Compliance

    Figure 9. Quarterly Reported Indicators by Compliance Threshold Range 2016

    Figure 8. 2014 Quarterly Reported Indicators by Compliance Threshold Range

    Overall, there was more than a 60% improvement (see Figure 7) among indicators that were reported

    below the targeted threshold in 2015. Again, in 2016, indicators measuring effectiveness were reported

    to have the greatest improvement in 2016 (see Figure 8).

    Eighty-One percent (81%) of all reported indicators were reported to be at or above the Eighty percent

    (80%) compliance threshold range (see Figure 9). Indicators not at or above the desired threshold are

    subject to further review by the QUALITY IMPROVEMENT & COMPLIANCE committee and a plan of

    action is developed to improve outcomes and performance.

    2015 Improvement by CARF Standard

    2014 Improvement by CARF Standard

    67%

    68%

    48% 33%

    61%

    0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%

    2016 Indicator Improvement

    Improvement

  • Quality Improvement and Compliance - 2016

    Page 9

    Table 5. Quarterly compliance and Utilization Reviews conducted

    in 2016

    During the year, Utilization/Compliance Reviews were completed as scheduled. A couple of additional

    utilization and target reviews were also conducted for baseline reporting (see Table 5.). These baseline

    reports help in the development of meaningful indicators for Quality Improvement monitoring in 2016.

    In comparison to the number of cases reviewed in the previous year, there was an eleven-percent (30%)

    increase in the number reviewed

    during 2016.

    REVIEW PROCESS NUMBER CASE FILES REVIEWED

    Quarterly Compliance 660 Target & Utilization 515

    Psychiatric Inpatient 454 Program Outcomes 290

    Nursing Services 100 Peer Review 88

    Finance 72

    Total *2,179

    *Some of the cases reviewed may have been reviewed under more than one

    process; the total number does not represent a unique case count.

  • Quality Improvement and Compliance - 2016

    Page 10

    4 7 9

    26

    14 13

    1

    20's 30's 40's 50's 60's 70's 80+

    Deaths by Age -2016

    Deaths by Age

    Figure 10. Client Deaths based on age at time of

    death; 2016

    QUALITY IMPROVEMENT & COMPLIANCE SUB-COMMITTEES

    CLIENT CARE MONITORING

    There were seven challenging cases presented to the Client Care Monitoring Committee (CCMC) during

    2016. Seventy four deaths were reported this year. (73 in 2015) There has been one death investigation

    reviewed to date, with two in process, and one only recently requested.

    Case presentations decreased by nearly 75% since 2014. There were a variety of client issues reported,

    including outpatient commitment, behavioral, and review of diagnoses in order to clarify primary issues.

    The Clinical Alert for Problematic Behaviors was put in place twice this year for two clients based on

    CCMC recommendations.

    Deaths increased from 55 in 2014 to 73 in 2015 to 74

    this year. The majority of the deaths were individuals in

    their 50’s. Medical issues were generally the cause of

    death based on the Major Unusual Incident Report.

    There were six heroin overdoses or suspected

    overdoses, and two suicides this past year. Very few

    Medical Examiner Reports are completed and/or

    received as the death is usually clearly due to

    natural/physical health causes.

    Level of care was discussed early in the year after

    review of a Death Investigation raised concerns. There

    is a critical need to have levels of care in place for all

    clients so that clients receive the appropriate level of

    services based on their clinical needs and risks. All staff had refresher training on how to determine the

    levels. As we move forward with managed care, we need to pay even greater attention to levels of

    care.

    COMPLIANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT

    The Compliance and Risk Management (C&RM) Committee continues to review indicators related to

    clinical documentation and utilization for compliance to established clinical best practices and agency’s

    policies and procedures (see Figure 21). Chart reviews, with indicators related to treatment planning,

    service provision and client progress were reviewed to determine if the staff members were adhering to

    aforementioned practices. Chart reviews were conducted on all treatment teams which revealed that

    progress was made and that there is room for more improvement. A specialized chart review was

    conducted to examine the effectiveness of Group CPST Services which are provided in the following

    programmatic areas: Partial Hospitalization, ITS, FACT, SAMI PACT, and ITT. All programs demonstrated

    areas of strength and need for improvement. All programs need to continue to review the admission /

    discharge criteria, work on curriculum / activities to keep clients engaged, and develop indicators to

    monitor progress.

  • Quality Improvement and Compliance - 2016

    Page 11

    4

    33

    3

    2

    1

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    Efficiency

    Effectiveness

    Accessibility

    Satisfaction

    Utilization…

    Number of Indicators reported to ROC in 2016

    Number ofIndicators

    Figure 12. Indicators reported to Research & Outcomes

    Committee during 2016 according to CARF standard

    Figure 11. Indicators reported to Research & Outcomes

    Committee according to CARF standard

    Figure 21. Number of indicators reported to C&RM by

    quarter during 2016 according to CARF Standard

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    Number of Indicators Reported to C&RM in 2016

    2016Indicators

    A termination summary review was

    completed and the review indicated a 100%

    of the summaries were completed and in the

    record. However, teams should make sure all

    outreach efforts are made & referrals are

    made to the Engagement Team to utilize all

    efforts to engage clients before cases are

    terminated.

    HIPPA Risk Assessment is being conducted to

    ensure compliance with HIPPA regulations.

    RESEARCH AND OUTCOMES

    The Research and Outcomes committee (ROC) met four (4) times in 2016 and reviewed results on Forty-Three (43) indicators primarily related to effectiveness standards (see Figure 12). During the year, one research proposal was reviewed and approved from the County of Summit Alcohol, Drug Addiction and Mental Health Services Board in concert with Kent State university titled: “WHAT

    IMPACT DO REIMBURSEMENT MODELS, POLICIES, & INTERVENTIONS, INCLUDING PPLAT’S HAVE ON SOCIETAL OUTCOMES (E. G. ARREST, INCARCERATION, AND HOSPITALIZATION) AND COSTS?” This is targeted for completion in 2017. This committee continues to review the variables regarding individuals hospitalized for psychiatric

    reasons to both reduce the initial hospitalization, as well those that are subsequently re-hospitalized.

    Although our number of individuals hospitalized is minimal, we continue to look for ways to improve

    even further.

    This committee is in process of revamping our currently measured indicators to be consistent with the

    Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) variables now required for agencies to measure

    beginning 2017.

    We have begun reviewing the Fidelity measures of all our Evidence Based Best Practices as evaluated

    through the Coordinating Center of Excellence currently consisting of our Assertive Community

  • Quality Improvement and Compliance - 2016

    Page 12

    Treatment Teams and Supported Employment. Additionally, several of our services provided to and

    reviewed by the Veteran’s Administration are analyzed.

    Additionally, this committee reviews measures regarding the success of our Primary Care Clinic in

    helping individuals in managing key vital signs such as blood pressure, A1C levels and weight. To assist in

    this effort, services geared towards a healthier lifestyle such as smoking cessation, “Walk with a Doc”,

    Dietician services, Optical services, Dental services, HIV and Podiatry are reviewed.

    This is an active committee where much work is conducted between meetings geared toward continual

    analysis and improvement of our services all targeted to improve outcomes for those we serve.

    RECOVERY ADVISORY COUNCIL

    In 2016, there were six Recovery Advisory Council (RAC) meetings. Attendees presented news articles

    on mental health-related interests as well as shared their artistry with the group. RAC developed LIFE

    CHAT, a publication born from the quarterly RAC newsletter to include contributions from the Health &

    Wellness Department and the Art Therapy program. In an effort to reach more consumers, the

    distribution of LIFE CHAT was increased with the mailing of the newsletter to all active consumers’

    homes. The intent of the mass mailings has been to increase the exposure of CSS services and those of

    other resources in the Akron area, all of which can help in the consumers’ recovery and draw interest to

    other readers who would otherwise not be informed.

    Numerous surveys were presented for review during RAC meetings, including: Agency Satisfaction;

    Family/Significant Other Satisfaction; Accessibility of Service; Work Tech Employer Satisfaction; Internal

    Referral Source; and External Referral Source. Also, RAC completed the consumer sections of the tool,

    Creating Cultures of Traumatic Informed Care Program Fidelity Scale, to begin giving more attention to

    trauma informed care at CSS.

    RECOGNITION & RETENTION

    The committee met nine times in 2016. 417 Catch the Spirit awards were given. A survey for eliciting

    feedback on committee pursuits for 2016 was

    completed. Softball returned. A summer picnic was

    planned and organized. A Rubber Ducks outing and four

    additional events were hosted.

    INCLUSION & DIVERSITY

    During 2016, an Ambassador program was implemented. Each committee member is considered an

    ambassador for the agency and a representative of the core values: Honesty, Respect, and Trust.

    Committee members are dedicated to meeting with new staff within the first sixty days of employment

    to welcome the staff to the agency and to review the inclusive behaviors of the committee. The

    Inclusion Moments initiative was created. The goal is for a staff member to recognize a fellow co-worker

    when the employee models the identified inclusive behaviors. The program was initially rolled out and

    Staff earned 417 Catch the Spirit Awards during 2016

  • Quality Improvement and Compliance - 2016

    Page 13

    Figure 13. Number of Hours Staff Dedicated to

    Training. (2013-2016)

    Figure 13. Number of Hours Staff Dedicated to

    Training. 2014-2010

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    Web BasedExternal

    Training Hours Completed in 2016

    2016

    2015

    2014

    2013

    introduced during the All Staff meeting is the last quarter. Cultural Diversity day was in September and

    determined to be successful. The Inclusion Committee has officially changed its name to the Inclusion &

    Diversity Committee to acknowledge the work the committee is doing to address the ongoing changing

    demographics of our staff and the individual served.

    STAFF TRAINING & EDUCATION

    Staff Training & Education provided seven

    internal trainings in 2016. There were a

    total of 5.5 continuing education hours

    available to all staff members of

    Community Support Services, Inc. to help

    staff learn more about human trafficking in

    the Summit County community and to

    increase our awareness of the importance

    of Self-Care. Three of the internal sessions

    were geared towards the Assertive

    Community Treatment teams to reinforce

    the ACT fidelity model. The sessions were

    facilitated by the Coordinating Center of Excellence at Case Western Reserve University.

    The agency continues to provide training and ongoing supervision in HYCBt-p for persons with

    psychosis. The Intensive Treatment Team participated in a partnership with the Traumatic Stress Center

    at Summa Health for screening and identification of individuals that have experienced trauma any time

    through the lifespan.

    Clinical and non-clinical staff completed 1,286 hours external training hours.

    3,362.25 hours of web-based learning were completed in 2016 as part of the agency’s annually required

    trainings and CEU-based trainings for licensed staff.

  • Quality Improvement and Compliance - 2016

    Page 14

    HEALTH & SAFETY

    There were one-

    hundred and forty-

    seven (147) Safety

    Inspections generating

    four hundred and

    eighty-six (486) Safety

    Work Orders. All

    deficiencies were

    corrected. The Safety

    Director reviewed Two-

    Hundred and Seventy-

    Five (275) Major

    Unusual Incident (MUI)

    reports during 2016

    (see Table 6).

    75% of Death Related

    MUI Reports

    documented a known

    cause of death, a 15%

    increase from 2015.

    The majority of death

    cases were reportedly

    in their 50’s.

    In non-death related

    MUI’s there was an

    increase in reported

    medication errors.

    These incidents were

    noted to have occurred

    at the pharmacy level.

    The increase in Verbal

    & Physical Aggression

    category is likely due to

    the classification

    process of MUI’s.

    Efforts to consistently

    categorize these types

    of occurrences will be

    made in 2017. The

    continued decrease in Code Green incidents is noted to be largely due to the presence of The Akron

    Police Department in the Med Clinic and Cross Street; client lobby area. Continuous efforts are made

    2016 2015 2014

    WORK ORDERS & INSPECTIONS

    Work Orders 176 Not Reported Not Reported

    Safety Work Orders 486 Not Reported Not Reported

    Completed Inspections 147 Not Reported Not Reported

    Completed Drills 211 Not Reported Not Reported

    MAJOR UNUSUAL INCIDENT (MUI) REPORTS

    Death Related:

    Unknown Cause 18 26 27

    Illness/Natural Cause 46 39 30

    Suicide 2 5 0

    Suspected/Confirmed Heroin OD 6 2 0

    Homicide 1 1 0

    Non-Death Related:

    Other 58 52 37

    Verbal Aggression 16 32 22

    Illness 28 27 26

    Fall 25 23 29

    Physical Aggression 18 20 24

    Property Damage/Loss 16 14 20

    Injury 10 8 10

    AWOL 7 5 3

    Non-Participation in Drill 9 5 7

    Suicide Threat 6 5 6

    Medication Error 16 4 12

    Auto Accident (Staff) 10 4 16

    Verbal &Physical Aggression 30 2 0

    Alleged Criminal Activity 4 1 5

    Infection Control 0 1 4

    Seizure 5 1 6

    Suicide Attempt 1 1 6

    Alleged Abuse/Neglect 2 1 4

    Weapon 2 1 4

    Alarm 2 0 5

    Code Red (Fire) 2 1 1

    Code Blue (Medical) 1 3 10

    Code Green (Behavior) 1 1 6

    Code Black (Tornado) 0 0 0

    Total of all MUI Reports 269 280 273

  • Quality Improvement and Compliance - 2016

    Page 15

    agency-wide to reinforce the prompt completion of incident reports for all required situations as well as

    for other concerns that may warrant further review.

    In 2016, health and safety related indicators were continued to be reported quarterly. This monitoring has

    assisted Quality Improvement in recognizing the issues facing staff and clients and has improved overall

    awareness of safety matters across the agency.

    CREDENTIALING

    FQHC related credentialing and privileging was completed for approximately 80 providers. Processes

    and policies were updated for FQHC related compliance.

  • Quality Improvement and Compliance - 2016

    Page 16

    COMMITTEE MEMBERS

    Allyson Haley

    Barbara Krannich

    Becki Thompson

    Bruce Winer

    Christian Ritter

    Cindy Johnson Crystal Dunivant

    Danya Bailey

    Denise Cunningham

    Denise Ronk

    Dorothea Hilson Doug Wagner

    Dr. M. Elahi

    Duane Perry

    Ed Casey

    Eileen Schwartz

    Fran Thomas Frank Sepetauc

    James Karpawich

    Jan Jones

    Janet Catalano

    Janet Swartzel

    Jerry Shadley

    Joanna Hewett Jon Garey

    Julie Morehead

    Kay Bowman Keith Stahl

    Kim Hartman

    Kim Meals Kristi DeArmitt

    Lee Snyder

    Linda Omobien

    Lora Walker

    Michele Nepsa

    Michell Montgomery

    Mike Greenfelder Nancy Mackey

    Narkeetah Brazil

    Natasha Westfall

    Patricia Henderson

    Patricia Rohlender Penny Moore

    Shaunta Scruggs

    Stephanie Sanders

    Stephen Maddox

    Steve Rastetter

    Susan Ritz

    Tasha Young Terry Dalton

    Tim Edgar

    Tom Baker

    Tracy Prohaska

    The Quality Improvement Program would like to

    thank each person who served on a standing

    committee during 2016.

    Your participation is GREATLY appreciated!

  • Who We Serve

    Page 17

    Figure 14. Agency Caseload (2016-2013).

    Figure 10. Agency caseload 2014-2010

    0

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    4,000

    2016 2015 2014 2013

    2016 Agency Caseload

    Number of Clients

    Figure 15. Agency Staff according to Program Role 2016

    .2015

    21.6%

    17.9% 19.6%

    9.8%

    2.7%

    7.8%

    4.4% 3.4% 2.4%

    7.1%

    3.4%

    Agency Staff Roles

    AGENCY CASELOAD

    Community Support Services, Inc.

    provided service to 5,857 unique

    individuals during 2016.

    As of December 31, 2016, there were

    3,456 clients on the agency’s caseload

    (see Figure 14).

    The agency’s caseload continues on

    the up rise and is largely due to the

    continued addition of new and

    expanded agency program services

    and our successful efforts to provide

    comprehensive health care services,

    and quality coordination of care.

    SERVICE PROVISION & AGENCY STAFF

    During 2016, the agency employed approximately 296 employees. 75% are Direct Service providers

    while the remaining, work in administrative and support staff roles (see Figure 15).

  • Who We Serve

    Page 18

    Figure 16. Agency Services (based on hours) provided in 2016-2015

    Figure 15. Agency Services (based on hours) provided in 2014

    Figure 17. Number of Patient Encounters in 2016

    Figure 15. Agency Services (based on hours) provided in

    2014

    TotalUnique New

    PCCPatients

    Total newPatients-Podiatry

    PrimaryCare andPodiatry

    Office Visits

    2016 241 38 3496

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    4000

    Ax

    is T

    itle

    Primary Care and Podiatry

    Service provision (based on the total number of documented hours) in 2016 demonstrates that the bulk

    of agency services provided are group and individual CPST services, Employment/Vocational, and Social

    Recreation (see Figure 16).Many of the comprehensive services the agency provides are supplemental

    to traditional and specialty CPST services and are based on crisis events and individual client needs.

    The Primary Care Clinic has provided wrap-around healthcare services to 241 new patients, while, 38

    new patients received Podiatry services in 2016. Combined, there were 3,496 documented office visits

    (see Figure 17), for 1,135 unique patients.

    0%

    25%

    50%

    75%

    100% Agency Service Provision

    2016

    2015

    *does not include Primary Care Services

  • Who We Serve

    Page 19

    Table 7. Client's Primary Mental Health Diagnosis based on ICD10 Code, 2016

    Table 7. Client's Primary Mental Health Diagnosis. 2014

    Figure 18. Primary Diagnosis by Schizophrenia Related Disorder;

    2016

    Figure 11. Axis I primary diagnosis by Schizophrenic Related

    Disorder 2014

    Paranoid 47.4%

    Schizoaffective 41.7%

    Unspecified 10.5%

    Type of Schizophrenia Related Disorder

    DIAGNOSIS

    MENTAL HEALTH

    According to a National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) survey conducted in 2014 by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), an estimated 43.6 million (18.1%) Americans ages 18 and older experience some form of mental illness. Serious mental illness among people ages 18 and older is defined at the federal level as; “at any time during the past year, a diagnosable mental, behavior, or emotional disorder that causes serious functional impairment that substantially interferes with or limits one or more major life activities”. SAHMSA also reports that “in 2014, there were an estimated 9.8 million adults (4.1%) ages 18 and up with a serious mental illness in the past year”.

    According to SAHMSA 1% of the US

    population suffers from Schizophrenia. The National Institute of Mental Health indicates that diagnostic records for active cases show that individuals with a diagnosed Schizophrenia related brain disorder account for 38.2% of Mental Health Diagnosis (see Table 7).

    These individuals are most often diagnosed with Schizophrenia, Paranoid Type or Schizoaffective Disorder (see Figure 18).

    Mental Health Related Diagnosis Number of DX Percentage of DX

    Schizophrenia 1329 44.3%

    Mood Disorders 551 17.3%

    Anxiety Related 629 19.7%

    Behavioral & Personality Disorders 490 15.4%

    Total 2,999

  • Who We Serve

    Page 20

    Male, 56%

    Female44%

    Client's Gender

    323 413

    517

    815

    538

    143

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    18-29 30--39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+

    Number of Clients in Age Range

    3%

    62%

    8%

    4%

    20%

    3%

    Widowed

    Single

    Married

    Separated

    Divorced

    No Data

    Client's Marital Status

    29.0%

    47.0%

    1.0%

    1.0%

  • Who We Serve

    Page 21

    INCOME AND BENEFITS

    Monthly Household Income

    2016

    Below $500.00 4.7% $500.00 - $999.00 70.0%

    $1000.00 – 1499.00 17.6% $1500.00 - $1999.00 4.6%

    $2000.00 + 3.1%

    Client’s Individual Income Source

    2016

    Wage/Salary 4.0%

    SSI 42.2% SSD 49.7%

    Retirement 1.7% Welfare/TANF 0.7%

    *Other Source Reported 1.6%

    Table 10. Client’s Income Source 2016 Table 9. Client’s Monthly Household

    Income 2016

    *Other sources include: family member, savings, child

    support, alimony, disability insurance/ workers comp and

    unemployment compensation.

  • Who We Serve

    Page 22

    GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION

    Clients reside throughout Summit County, but are most concentrated in Akron and surrounding

    communities (see figure 23.).

    Cuyahoga Falls

    8%

    Akron 52%

    West Akron 17%

    Barberton &

    Surrounding

    Areas 11%

    Stow/Tallmadge

    4%

    Northern Summit County 5%

    Southern Summit County 2%

    Figure 23. Map of Summit County, Client’s area of residence

  • In The Community

    Page 23

    In 2016, Community Support Services served as an internship/residency site

    for seventeen students from social work, counseling, psychology, medical

    assistants, and other related programs. These students completed 4801

    intern hours. The dollar value of the work completed by students

    was $110,759.07. Equally important, these students learned about

    Community Support Services and severe mental illness. As they begin their

    careers, they will be better positioned to assist others who may be

    struggling as well as connect individuals to appropriate services.

    Agency staff and clients benefited greatly from the efforts of one dedicated volunteer who performed 302 hours of service. The work of the volunteers had a monetary value of $6,967.14 These individuals provided support services to assist the agency in meeting its goals. Community Support Services, in addition to its volunteers, is grateful for the ongoing dedication of the Board of Directors who collectively donated 513 hours to the agency in 2016.

    Community Support Services, Inc. continued to host Lunch with Leaders in 2016 with 27 attendees.

    These sessions introduce community leaders to the agency while challenging the stigma associated with

    mental illness. The agency also invited adult care providers and apartment managers to an appreciation

    luncheon to provide an opportunity to share information about agency services while recognizing them

    for being a valuable part of the team. Additionally, the Supported Employment program shared the

    power of employment for our clients at a luncheon for potential employers.

    The organization maintained its presence in the community in 2016 with fifteen community

    presentations reaching 320 people. Additionally, staff and board members represented the agency at

    twenty community events such as the Annual NAMIWalk, the WAKR Senior Luncheon series, and the

    ADM Recovery Challenge. The agency proudly displayed consumer artwork during the Art of Recovery

    event held at Greystone Hall.

    Community Support Services continued efforts to increase its presence on social media with more than

    300 new followers on Facebook. Additionally, the agency actively engaged with Twitter. The agency

    also updated its website in an effort to me more user friendly and provider website visitors with an

    opportunity to connect directly with the agency for guidance. In 2016, the agency had more than

    28,000 visitors to its website.