1
Example: 100% RES electricity scenario • Step 1 : macro-area level Ö Computaon of energy shares (per technology) and imbalances for each macro-area (based upon weighng funcons). Preliminary allocaon of the corresponding generaon capacies Ö Final allocaon of the generaon capacies (per technology) based upon ANTARES runs (simulaon of system adequacy during one year at a me resoluon of one hour using a market simulator) Ö Control of energy imbalances (coherency with scenario) • Step 2: country-level Ö Use results from step 1 with same algorithm at country level Ö Addional constraints: NREAP for 2020 for each country • Step 3: cluster level Ö Use results from step 2 with same algorithm at cluster level Ö Addional constraints: urban areas and natural reserves • Results for step 3: Energy shares per technology with imbalances Final allocaon of generaon capacies per technology e-Highway 2050 Modular Development Plan of the pan-European Transmission System for 2050 e-Highway2050 results on scenarios setup and quanficaon: • Challenging energy scenarios for the pan-European transmission system by 2050 • Decomposion of Europe in 96 clusters • Related methodologies for long-term energy scenario building and their quanficaon Challenging energy scenarios at 2050 • A Scenario is a combinaon of a Strategy (endogeneous opons: upon which decision makers have control) used within a Future (exogeneous uncertaines: upon which decision makers have no control) • Scenario setup results from 5 futures and 6 strategies, i.e. 30 possible scenarios • Each scenario must be challenging for the power system at 2050 Selected scenarios at 2050 • Two-step filtering process: from 30 to 5 challenging scenarios. • Step 1: spurious scenarios Ö NUC and CCS: futures (public percepon) and strategies (foreseen deployment) are contradictory for nuclear and CCS. Ö No Policy: futures (market driven) and strategies (strong policy framework) are contradictory. Ö Non-logical: contradictory futures and strategies (simultaneous development of renewables and storage at small and large scales). Contact : [email protected] Web: www.e-highway2050.eu Follow us on Twier: @e_Highway2050 Project coordinator: • Step 2: selecon of the 5 most challenging scenarios according to 10 parameters measuring their impact on the power system Decomposion of Europe into 96 clusters • Two-step approach (clusters must not be too small, be based on unified standards and grid characteriscs, be scenario independent) Ö Step 1: clustering algorithm aggregang smaller areas with a K means funcon (with weighng funcons on specific criteria such as populaon, potenal of RES generaon, land use, thermal generaon capacity, etc.). Ö Step 2: expert view of TSOs (sanity check). Scenarios quanficaon methodology •A top-down approach built around 3 steps has been developed to quanfy the five scenarios in terms of installed capacies for each cluster with a copper plate assumpon Ö Inializaon:computeenergytargetpergeneraontechnology from demand at European level Ö Step 1: installed capacies in each macro-area (9 macro-areas) Ö Step 2: installed capacies in each country (33 countries) Ö Step 3: installed capacies for each cluster (96 clusters) Qualitative scenarios European clusters Environmental validation Grid simulations Cost Benefit Analysis Modular plan New methodologies Technology database Quantified scenarios STEP 1: from Europe to Macro-areas STEP 2: from Macro-area to Country level STEP 3: from Country to Cluster level Cluster Africa % EU load: 3 % 47% 22% 10% 0% 0% 21% Central Europe 59% 14% 10% 0% 0% 17% East Europe 34% 3% 1% 0% 0% 62% North Europe 29% 32% 9% 0% 0% 30% South Europe 37% 37% 9% 0% 17% South West Europe 63% 20% 7% 0% 1% 9% West Europe 51% 22% 6% 0% 0% 21% X-7 - European Energy Share Wind Solar (with CSP) Biomass Nuclear Thermal Hydro Load: 972 TWh Balance: -34% Load: 567 TWh Balance: -11% Load: 667 TWh Balance: -20% Load: 303 TWh Balance: 86% Load: 431 TWh Balance: 4% Load: 1416 TWh Balance: -16% North Sea % EU-load: 11% Work Package leaders: 0 GW 100 GW 200 GW 300 GW Wind PV CSP Biomas Wind PV CSP Biomas Wind PV CSP Biomas Wind PV CSP Biomas Wind PV CSP Biomas Wind PV CSP Biomas Western Europe South-Western Europe Central Europe Northern Europe Eastern Europe South Europe Potential - 2050 today - 2012 NREAP - 2020 X-7 North Sea North Africa West Europe East Europe Central Europe Nord Europe South West Europe South Europe This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for research, technological development and demonstraon under Grant Agreement n° 308908

Qualitative European Environmental e-Highway 2050 · 2020. 4. 9. · development of renewables and storage at small and large ... selection of the 5 most challenging scenarios according

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Qualitative European Environmental e-Highway 2050 · 2020. 4. 9. · development of renewables and storage at small and large ... selection of the 5 most challenging scenarios according

Example: 100% RES electricity scenario• Step1:macro-arealevel

Ö Computationofenergyshares(pertechnology)andimbalancesforeach macro-area (based upon weighting functions). Preliminaryallocationofthecorrespondinggenerationcapacities

Ö Finalallocationofthegenerationcapacities(pertechnology)baseduponANTARESruns(simulationofsystemadequacyduringoneyearatatimeresolutionofonehourusingamarketsimulator)

Ö Controlofenergyimbalances(coherencywithscenario)

• Step2:country-levelÖ Useresultsfromstep1withsamealgorithmatcountrylevelÖ Additionalconstraints:NREAPfor2020foreachcountry

• Step3:clusterlevelÖ Useresultsfromstep2withsamealgorithmatclusterlevelÖ Additionalconstraints:urbanareasandnaturalreserves

• Resultsforstep3:Energy shares per technology with imbalances

Final allocation of generation capacities per technology

e-Highway 2050Modular Development Plan

of the pan-European Transmission System for 2050

e-Highway2050 results on scenarios setup and quantification:• Challengingenergyscenariosforthepan-Europeantransmissionsystemby2050• DecompositionofEuropein96clusters• Relatedmethodologiesforlong-termenergyscenariobuildingandtheirquantification

Challenging energy scenarios at 2050• AScenarioisacombinationofaStrategy

(endogeneousoptions:uponwhichdecisionmakershavecontrol)usedwithinaFuture(exogeneousuncertainties:uponwhichdecisionmakershavenocontrol)

• Scenariosetupresultsfrom5futuresand6strategies,i.e.30possiblescenarios

• Eachscenariomustbechallengingforthepowersystemat2050

Selected scenarios at 2050• Two-stepfilteringprocess:from30to5

challengingscenarios.• Step1:spuriousscenarios

Ö NUCandCCS:futures(publicperception)andstrategies(foreseendeployment)arecontradictoryfornuclearandCCS.

Ö NoPolicy:futures(marketdriven)andstrategies(strongpolicyframework)arecontradictory.

Ö Non-logical:contradictoryfuturesandstrategies(simultaneousdevelopmentofrenewablesandstorageatsmallandlargescales).

Contact : [email protected] Web: www.e-highway2050.eu

Follow us on Twitter: @e_Highway2050

Project coordinator:

• Step2:selectionofthe5mostchallengingscenariosaccordingto10parametersmeasuringtheirimpactonthepowersystem

Decomposition of Europe into 96 clusters• Two-stepapproach(clustersmustnotbetoo

small,bebasedonunifiedstandardsandgridcharacteristics,bescenarioindependent)

Ö Step 1: clustering algorithm aggregating smaller areas with a Kmeansfunction(withweightingfunctionsonspecificcriteriasuchas population, potential of RES generation, land use, thermalgenerationcapacity,etc.).

Ö Step2:expertviewofTSOs(sanitycheck).

Scenarios quantification methodology• Atop-downapproachbuiltaround3stepshas

beendevelopedtoquantifythefivescenariosintermsofinstalledcapacitiesforeachclusterwithacopperplateassumptionÖ Initialization:computeenergytargetpergenerationtechnologyfromdemandatEuropeanlevel

Ö Step1:installedcapacitiesineachmacro-area(9macro-areas)

Ö Step2:installedcapacitiesineachcountry(33countries)

Ö Step3:installedcapacitiesforeachcluster(96clusters)

Qualitative scenarios

European clusters

Environmentalvalidation

Grid simulations

Cost BenefitAnalysis

Modularplan

Newmethodologies

Technology database

Quantifiedscenarios

STEP1:fromEuropetoMacro-areas STEP2:fromMacro-areatoCountrylevel

STEP3:fromCountrytoClusterlevel

Cluster

Africa % EU load: 3 %

47%

22%

10%

0%

0%

21%

Central Europe

59%14%

10%

0%0%

17%

East Europe

34%

3%1%

0%0%

62%

North Europe

29%

32%9%

0%

0%

30%

South Europe

37%

37%

9%

0% 17%

South West Europe

63%20%

7%

0% 1%9%

West Europe

51%22%

6%

0%0%

21%

X-7 - European Energy Share

WindSolar(withCSP)BiomassNuclearThermalHydro

Load: 972 TWh Balance: -34%

Load: 567 TWh Balance: -11%

Load: 667 TWh Balance: -20%

Load: 303 TWh Balance: 86%

Load: 431 TWh Balance: 4%

Load: 1416 TWh Balance: -16%

North Sea % EU-load: 11%

Work Package leaders:

0 GW

100 GW

200 GW

300 GW

Wind PV CSP

Biom

as

Wind PV CSP

Biom

as

Wind PV CSP

Biom

as

Wind PV CSP

Biom

as

Wind PV CSP

Biom

as

Wind PV CSP

Biom

as

WesternEurope South-WesternEurope CentralEurope NorthernEurope EasternEurope SouthEurope

Potential - 2050 today - 2012 NREAP - 2020 X-7

NorthSea

North Africa

West Europe

East Europe

Central Europe

Nord Europe

South West Europe South

Europe

ThisprojecthasreceivedfundingfromtheEuropeanUnion’sSeventhProgrammeforresearch,technologicaldevelopmentanddemonstrationunderGrantAgreementn°308908