14
Qualifying new technologies for deepwater operation Presented by Smarty Mathew John Senior Engineer London, UK 03-25-2015

Qualifying new technologies for deepwater operation - …mcedd.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/00_Smarty-Mathew-John-AB… · Qualifying new technologies for deepwater operation

  • Upload
    phamque

  • View
    215

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Quali

fyin

g ne

w te

chno

logi

es fo

r de

epwa

ter o

pera

tion

Pres

ented

bySm

arty

Mat

hew

John

Senio

r Eng

ineer

Lond

on, U

K03

-25-

2015

•B

ackg

roun

d

•N

ew T

echn

olog

y Q

ualif

icat

ion

•A

ppro

val I

n P

rinci

ple

(AIP

)•

AIP

to F

ull A

ppro

val

•M

anag

ed P

ress

ure

Dril

ling

(MPD

) Ove

rvie

w

•M

PD S

yste

m –

Key

Asp

ects

and

Ris

k M

anag

emen

t

Outli

ne

Nov

el C

once

pt•

New

ly d

evel

oped

sy

stem

or t

echn

olog

y.•

Mod

ifica

tion

enab

ling

use

of e

stab

lishe

d sy

stem

or t

echn

olog

y in

new

ope

ratin

g en

viro

nmen

t(s).

Mot

ivat

ion

•H

arsh

Env

ironm

ents

•In

crea

sed

effic

ienc

y•

Aut

omat

ion

Back

grou

nd

Back

grou

nd

Cha

lleng

es•

Lack

of o

r gap

s in

des

ign

code

s/st

anda

rds.

•La

ck o

f sys

tem

per

spec

tive

–in

terfa

ces

and

inte

grat

ion.

•H

igh

com

plex

ity a

nd u

ncer

tain

ty.

•S

afet

y le

vel d

eter

min

atio

n.•

No

prio

r exp

erie

nce.

Tech

nolo

gy Q

ualif

icat

ion

(TQ

)•

Exa

min

ing

the

syst

em a

nd p

rovi

ding

evi

denc

e to

de

mon

stra

te th

at th

e te

chno

logy

em

ploy

ed m

eets

sp

ecifi

ed re

quire

men

ts fo

r the

inte

nded

use

.

New

Tech

nolo

gy Q

ualif

icatio

n

* *ABS

refe

rs to

Am

eric

an B

urea

u of

Shi

ppin

g, a

n af

filia

ted

com

pany

of A

BS G

roup

.

Appr

oval

In P

rincip

le (A

IP) P

roce

ss

Iden

tify

nove

l as

pect

s &

rela

ted

tech

nolo

gy

read

ines

s le

vel

(TR

L)

Con

duct

pre

limin

ary

engi

neer

ing

eval

uatio

n, d

esig

n ve

rific

atio

n an

d va

lidat

ion

Con

duct

pr

elim

inar

y ris

k as

sess

men

t(s)

Show

-st

oppe

rs

?

Det

erm

ine

qual

ifica

tion

activ

ities

and

ac

cept

ance

cr

iteria

-TQ

Pla

n

Mak

e ne

cess

ary

mod

ifica

tions

Issu

e A

IP a

long

w

ith A

ppro

val

Roa

d M

ap

Yes

No

Rev

iew

goa

ls,

perf

orm

ance

re

quire

men

ts

(PR

) & d

esig

n ba

sis

AIP

to F

ull A

ppro

val

Con

duct

det

aile

d en

gine

erin

g ev

alua

tion,

des

ign

verif

icat

ion

and

valid

atio

n

Con

duct

det

aile

d ris

k as

sess

men

t(s)

Goa

ls &

PR

met

&

adeq

uate

?

Mak

e ne

cess

ary

mod

ifica

tions

Issu

e Fi

nal C

lass

A

ppro

val

Yes

No

Add

’lqu

alifi

ca-ti

onac

tiviti

es?

Upd

ate

TQ P

lan

Yes

No

Exec

ute

TQ P

lan

New

Tech

nolo

gy E

volu

tion

TRL

0

TRL

1 &

2

TRL

3

TRL

4 &

5

TRL

6 &

7

Tech

nolo

gy

Rea

dine

ss

Leve

l (T

RL)

***

*Risk

Ass

essm

ent s

ervi

ces p

rovi

ded

by A

BSG

Cons

ultin

g In

c.**

ABS

serv

ices

pro

vide

d by

Am

eric

an B

urea

u of

Shi

ppin

g.

“Liv

ing”

doc

umen

t mai

ntai

ned

thro

ugho

ut th

e pr

ojec

t lif

ecyc

le w

hich

det

ails

•Ty

pe o

f ris

k as

sess

men

t(s) t

o be

car

ried

out a

nd

its/th

eir s

ched

ulin

g.•

Sco

pe o

f eac

h as

sess

men

t.•

Ris

k m

etric

s/cr

iteria

for a

ccep

tanc

e, p

riorit

izat

ion

and

re-v

alid

atio

n.•

Ris

k m

itiga

tion

resp

onsi

bilit

ies.

•Li

nk to

Ris

k R

egis

ter.

•Li

nk to

TQ

Pla

n.

Risk

Man

agem

ent P

lan (R

MP)

Mana

ged

Pres

sure

Dril

ling

(MPD

) Ove

rview

Exam

ple

MPD

Sys

tem

Clos

ed-lo

op c

ircul

atio

n sy

stem

•Rot

atin

g Co

ntro

l Dev

ice

(RCD

)•M

echa

nica

l loa

d-be

arin

g co

mpo

nent

s•P

ress

ure-

cont

aini

ng c

ompo

nent

s•P

ress

ure-

cont

rolli

ng c

ompo

nent

s•P

ress

ure-

reta

inin

g co

mpo

nent

s•C

ontr

ol sy

stem

•R

ef. S

tand

ard(

s): A

PI 1

6RCD

and

API

16A

Kick

Det

ectio

n an

d Su

rfac

e Ba

ck

Pres

sure

(SBP

) con

trol

•MPD

Cho

ke C

ontr

ol S

yste

m•S

ingl

e po

int f

ailu

re c

riter

ia, c

ontr

ol lo

gic

•Dat

a ac

quisi

tion

syst

ems

•HPU

des

ign

•HM

I, Al

arm

s, In

terlo

cks,

Sys

tem

In

terf

aces

, De

pend

enci

es•A

rea

Clas

sific

atio

n

Ove

rpre

ssur

e Pr

otec

tion

•Pre

ssur

e Re

lief V

alve

(PRV

) sys

tem

•Ove

rarc

hing

phi

loso

phy

•Arr

ange

men

t•S

izing

, cap

acity

•Bac

kpre

ssur

e•D

ischa

rge

loca

tion

and

rout

ing

•Con

trol

syst

em

MPD

Syst

em K

ey A

spec

ts

MPD

Syst

em R

isk A

sses

smen

ts

Scop

e St

udie

sO

bjec

tive(

s)

Prel

imin

ary

Ris

k A

sses

smen

t

Ent

ire M

PD

Sys

tem

and

its

inte

rface

s w

ith e

xist

ing

rig

drill

ing

equi

pmen

tH

AZI

D

(1)

Iden

tify

at a

hig

h-le

vel h

azar

dous

sce

nario

s re

late

d to

M

PD

sys

tem

layo

ut a

nd o

pera

tions

.

(2)

Miti

gate

risk

as

nece

ssar

y by

mod

ifyin

g de

sign

or

oper

atio

ns.

(3)

Dev

elop

qua

lific

atio

n ac

tiviti

es w

hen

nece

ssar

y.

Det

aile

d R

isk

Ass

essm

ents

Ent

ire M

PD

Sys

tem

and

its

inte

rface

s w

ith e

xist

ing

rig

drill

ing

equi

pmen

tH

AZO

P

(1)

Iden

tify

haza

rdou

s sc

enar

ios

rela

ted

to M

PD

sys

tem

de

sign

and

ope

ratio

ns b

y ev

alua

ting

devi

atio

ns d

urin

g al

l ope

ratio

nal m

odes

(nor

mal

and

em

erge

ncy

even

ts).

(2) M

itiga

te ri

sk a

s ne

cess

ary

by m

odify

ing

desi

gn o

r op

erat

ions

.

(3) D

evel

op q

ualif

icat

ion

activ

ities

whe

n ne

cess

ary.

Rot

atin

g C

ontro

l Dev

ice

(RC

D)

and

its c

ontro

l sys

tem

FME

A(1

)V

erify

that

no

sing

le fa

ilure

can

lead

to a

n un

safe

ev

ent (

sing

le p

oint

failu

re c

riter

ion)

.

(2)

Miti

gate

risk

as

nece

ssar

y by

mod

ifyin

g de

sign

or

oper

atio

ns.

(3)

Dev

elop

qua

lific

atio

n ac

tiviti

es w

hen

nece

ssar

y.

Ann

ular

Isol

atio

n D

evic

e an

d its

co

ntro

l sys

tem

FME

A

PR

V C

ontro

l Sys

tem

FME

A

Tech

nolo

gy q

ualif

icat

ion

•S

yste

mat

ic a

ppro

ach

to

tech

nolo

gy

asse

ssm

ent.

•R

educ

ed le

vel o

f un

certa

inty

and

in

crea

sed

conf

iden

ce.

•P

ro-a

ctiv

e ris

k m

anag

emen

t app

roac

h.•

Abi

lity

to s

et/c

onfir

m

perfo

rman

ce

requ

irem

ents

and

re

liabi

lity

goal

s.

Conc

lusio

n

Con

tact

Info

rmat

ion

•S

mar

ty M

athe

w J

ohn,

Sen

ior E

ngin

eer –

Offs

hore

&

Sub

sea

Ris

k &

Rel

iabi

lity

App

licat

ions

, AB

S G

roup

•P

hone

: +1

281-

994-

0898

•E

mai

l: sm

john

@ea

gle.

org

Ques

tions

/ Disc

ussio

n

© C

opyr

ight

201

5 AB

SG C

onsu

lting

Inc.

All

right

s res

erve

d. A

BSG

Cons

ultin

g In

c. is

an

ABS

Grou

p Co

mpa

ny.