QTBD Pro

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 QTBD Pro

    1/9

    PROJECT REPORT

    ON

    AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY

    MARUTI SUZUKI V/S TATA MOTORS

    QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES BASED DECISION MAKING

    GROUP NUMBER - 4

    SUBMITTED BY: - SUBMITTED TO:-

    PRIYANKA KUMARI (2011147) Dr. S. MAHESWARAN

    ROHIT SRIVASTAVA (2011160)

    SAVI AHUJA (2011172)

    SHWETA MANOHAR (2011186)

    PGDM (2011-13)

    SECTION - D

    V/s

  • 8/3/2019 QTBD Pro

    2/9

    TABLE OF CONTENT

    S. NO. CONTENT PAGE NO.

    1. INTRODUCTION

    INDUSTRY COMPANIES

    2. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

    3. RESEARCH DESIGN

    SOURCE OF DATA PERIOD TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES

    4. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

    5. IMPLICATION

    6. FUTURE SCOPE OF THE STUDY

    7. BIBLIOGRAPHY

  • 8/3/2019 QTBD Pro

    3/9

    INTRODUCTION

    ABOUT THE INDUSTRY:-

    The automotive industry designs, develops, manufactures, markets, and sells motor

    vehicles, and is one of the world's most important economic sectors by revenue.

    The term automotive industry usually does not include industries dedicated to automobiles

    after delivery to the customer, such as repair shops and motor fuel filling stations.

    The Automotive industry in India is one of the largest in the world and one of the fastest

    growing globally. India manufactures over 17.5 million vehicles (including 2 wheeled and 4

    wheeled) and exports about 2.33 million every year. India's passenger car and commercial

    vehicle manufacturing industry is the seventh largest in the world, with an annual production

    of more than 3.7 million units in 2010.

    As of 2010, India is home to 40 million passenger vehicles and more than 3.7 million

    automotive vehicles were produced in India in 2010 (an increase of 33.9%). According to the

    Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers, annual car sales are projected to increase up to

    5 million vehicles by 2015 and more than 9 million by 2020. By 2050, the country is

    expected to top the world in car volumes with approximately 611 million vehicles on

    the nation's roads.

    ABOUT THE COMPANIES:-

    MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA

    Market Share: Passenger Vehicles 46.07%

    Maruti Suzuki India Limited, a subsidiary of Suzuki Motor Corporation of Japan, is India's

    largest passenger car company, accounting for over 45% of the domestic car market. The

    company offers a complete range of cars from entry level Maruti-800 and Alto, to stylish

    hatchback Ritz, A star, Swift, Wagon-R, Estillo and sedans DZire, SX4 and Sports Utility

    vehicle Grand Vitara.

    1.

  • 8/3/2019 QTBD Pro

    4/9

    It is the market leader in India and on 17 September 2007, Maruti Udyog Limited was

    renamed Maruti Suzuki India Limited. The company's headquarters are located in New

    Delhi

    Tata Motors

    Market Share: Commercial Vehicles 63.94%, Passenger Vehicles 16.45%

    Tata Motors Limited is Indias largest automobile company, with consolidated revenues of

    USD 14 billion in 2008-09. It is the leader in commercial vehicles and among the top three in

    passenger vehicles. Tata Motors has winning products in the compact, midsize car and utility

    vehicle segments. The company is the world's fourth largest truck manufacturer, and the

    world's second largest bus manufacturer with over 24,000 employees. Since first rolled out in

    1954, Tata Motors as has produced and sold over 4 million vehicles in India.

    A COMPARATIVE VIEW ON THE TWO COMPANIES:-Maruti Suzuki Tata motors

    Founded In 1981 (as Maruti Udyog Limited) 1945

    Key Person(s) Mr. Shinzo Nakanishi, M.D and CEO JRD Tata

    Headquarters New Delhi Mumbai

    Revenue 37,522.4 crore 123,133 crore

    Net Income 2,288.6 crore 9274 crore

    Parent Suzuki Motor Corporation Tata Group

    Objectives of Study:-

    The main objectives of the study concerning the two major companies are to provide with:

    Determine the mean sales turnover of both the companies. Determining of the measure of central tendency and variability of the data of both

    companies.

    Testing of the Hypothesis stating that the means of both the companiesare equal.2.

  • 8/3/2019 QTBD Pro

    5/9

    Data of Maruti Suzuki Ltd. and Tata Motors:-

    Year

    Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Tata Motors

    Sales Turnover

    (in Rs. Cr.)

    Earnings per

    Share (in Rs.)

    Sales

    Turnover (in

    Rs. Cr.)

    Earnings per

    Share (in Rs.)

    2001-02 9231.3 78.91 8710.05 -1.98

    2002-03 9203.8 5.07 10700.66 9.38

    2003-04 11392.5 18.76 15298.47 22.96

    2004-05 13458.2 29.55 20262.61 34.19

    2005-06 14898.8 41.16 23490.55 39.94

    2006-07 17358.4 54.07 31089.69 49.65

    2007-08 21200.4 59.91 33123.54 52.63

    2008-09 23381.5 42.18 28538.2 19.48

    2009-10 32174.1 86.45 38364.1 39.26

    2010-11 40590.5 79.21 52135.97 28.55

    Calculations:-

    Measures

    Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Tata Motors

    Earnings per

    share

    Sales

    Turnover

    Earnings per

    share

    Sales

    Turnover

    Mean 49.527 19288.95 29.406 26171.384

    Variance 742.477 106933812.5 300.7842 178389811.2

    Standard Deviation 27.24843 10340.88064 17.34313 13356.26487Coeff. Of Variation 55.01732789 53.61038648 58.97820408 51.03385005

    3.

  • 8/3/2019 QTBD Pro

    6/9

    TEST OF HYPOTHESIS

    Let N be the population sizes

    be the population mean

    Let a sample of size n is drawn from the population

    Let xbe the sample mean.

    Step 1:Null hypothesis: Ho : 1 = 2

    i.e. mean sales turnover of Maruti Suzuki is equal to the mean sales turnover of Tata Motors

    Alternative hypothesis: H1 : 1 2

    i.e. mean sales turnover of Maruti Suzuki is not equal to the mean sales turnover of Tata

    Motors

    Step 2:Level of significance, =5%

    Step 3:Test statistic

    t x1- x2 )-(1 - 2 )]/(s12/n1 )+(s2

    2/n2)] ~> t(n1+n2-2) degrees of freedom

    Since 1=2, our test statistic becomes as under:

    t x1- x2)/s2(1/n1 )+(1/n2)]

    x1-x2=-6882.434

    By assuming the population variance to be equal for both the populations, the combined

    variance can be estimated as:

    s2=[(n1-1)s12+(n2-1)s2

    2]/(n1+n2-2)

    s2=142661811.8

    s2(1/n1 )+(1/n2)]= 11944.11201t=-0.576219814

    Step-4: The tabulated value is obtained from T-table at specific level of significance

    corresponding to the degrees of freedom and denoted as te.

    te=2.101

    Step 5: Inference

    If |t|

  • 8/3/2019 QTBD Pro

    7/9

    Analysis:-

    Based upon the measures of Central Tendency and Variability.

    The mean of the Earning per share of both the companies has beencalculated and tabulated above which shows Maruti Suzuki giving a

    better earnings per share better than Tata Motors, but when Standard

    deviation and Coefficient of variation are taken into account, we can

    infer that the EPS of Maruti Suzuki varies more than Tata Motors

    implying Tata Motors shares to be more stable source of earning for the

    Shareholders, hence a better choice.

    The mean Sales Turnoverof Maruti Suzuki is lower than the mean SalesTurnover of Tata Motors but the data of Maruti has less Coefficient of

    Variation than that of Tata Motors, hence providing more credibility to

    the statistics of Maruti Suzuki and its Sales Turnover.

    Based upon the Testing of Hypothesis.

    We conducted a Two-Tail hypothesis testing with our Null Hypothesisas the mean sales turnover of Maruti Suzuki equal to the mean sales

    turnover of Tata Motors.

    According to the testing procedure we come to a conclusion thataccording to the samples taken, the mean sales turnover of Maruti

    Suzuki does not equal to the Sales Turnover of Tata Motors.

    5.

  • 8/3/2019 QTBD Pro

    8/9

    Future Prospects:-

    6.

  • 8/3/2019 QTBD Pro

    9/9

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    BOOKS REFERRED:-

    STATISTICS FOR BUSINESS AND ECONOMICSBY ANDERSON, SWEENEY, WILLIAMS

    STATISTICS FOR MANAGEMENTBY GERALD KELLER

    WEB REFRENCES:-

    Marutisuzuki.com Tatamotors.com Moneycontrol.com Wikipedia.org

    7.