Qmdm Case Final

  • Upload
    usama17

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final

    1/7

    REG NO 10045

    Case Study

    Quantitative Methods for Decision Making

    Saad Khawar1/3/2010

    The document includes solution to the case study given in class MBA-1 in first semester course QMDM

    taught by Dr. Ahmed Ali Shah

    Submitted to: Dr. Ahmed Ali Shah

  • 8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final

    2/7

    2Saad Khawar Case Study - I - QMDM

    1. Write summary of given and the result required?It is an application of linear programming used to measure the relative efficiency of operating units with

    the same goals and objectives. This case is about the use Data Envelopment Analysis to measure the

    relative efficiency of County hospital. For this purpose we have used a linear programming model to

    construct a hypothetical composite hospital based on the outputs and inputs for the four hospitals inthe problem. For each operating unit that we want to measure the efficiency of, we must formulate and

    solve a linear programming model similar to the linear program we solved to measure the relative

    efficiency of County Hospital. The following step by step procedure should help you in formulating a

    linear programming model for other types of DEA applications. Note that the operating unit we want to

    measure the relative efficiency of is referred to as the jth operating unit.

  • 8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final

    3/7

    3Saad Khawar Case Study - I - QMDM

    2. The theory used in setting the equationsA linear programming model is developed for each hospital whose efficiency has to be evaluated. Then a

    composite hospital is created based on the outputs and inputs for all the four hospitals.

    Output Measures

    y Patient-days of service under Medicarey Patient-days of service not under Medicarey Number of nurses trainedy Number of interns trained

    Input Measures

    y The number of full-time equivalent (FTE) non physician personnely The amount spent on suppliesy The number of bed-days available

    Variables to be determined

    wg weight applied to inputs and outputs for General Hospital

    wu weight applied to inputs and outputs for University Hospital

    wc weight applied to inputs and outputs for County Hospital

    ws weight applied to inputs and outputs for State Hospital

    Constraints

    The DEA approach requires that the sum of these weights equal 1. Thus, the first constraint is

    wg +wu +wc +ws = 1

    Output Constraints

    Medicare Patient-Days for

    composite hospital

    = (Medicare Patient-Days for General Hospital)*wg +

    (Medicare Patient-Days for County Hospital)*wc +

    (Medicare Patient-Days for University hospital)*wu +

    (Medicare Patient-Days for state hospital)*ws +

  • 8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final

    4/7

    4Saad Khawar Case Study - I - QMDM

    Medicare patient-days

    for Composite Hospital

    The other output measures for the composite hospital are computed in a similar fashion.

    General Format for the output

    constraints

    Output for the composite hospital >= Output for county hospital

    Medicare Patient days 48.14 wg + 34.62 wu + 36.72 wc + 33.16 ws >= 36.72

    Non medicare patient days 43.10 wg + 27.11 wu + 45.98 wc + 56.46 ws >= 45.98

    Nurses 253 wg+148 wu+175 wc+l60 ws >= 175

    Interns 41 wg+27 wu+23 wc+84 ws >= 23

    Input Constraints

    FTE nonphysicians

    for Composite Hospital

    The other input measures for the composite hospital are computed in a similar fashion.

    General Format for the input

    constraints

    Output for the composite hospital >= Output for county hospital

    FTE physicians 285.20wg + 162.30wu + 275.70wc + 210.40ws

    Supple Expense 123.80wg + 128.70wu + 348.50wc + 154.10ws

    Bed-days 106.70wg + 64.21wu + 104.10wc + 104.04ws

    Objective Function

    Minimize E = the fraction of County Hospitals input available to the composite hospital

    E is also known as efficiency index

    The input constraint corresponding to FTE non physicians, supplies and bed-days:

    285.20wg + 162.30wu +275.70wc+210.40ws

  • 8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final

    5/7

    5Saad Khawar Case Study - I - QMDM

    48.14wg+ 34.62wu +36.72wc+33.16ws >=36.72

    43.10wg+ 27.11wu +45.98wc+33.16ws >=45.98

    253wg + 148wu +175wc + 160ws >=175

    41wg + 27wu +23wc + 84ws >=23

    123.80wg+ 128.70wu +348.50wc+154.10ws

  • 8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final

    6/7

    6Saad Khawar Case Study - I - QMDM

    Proof

    wg 0.212

    wu 0.260

    ws 0.527

    wc 0.000

    E 0.905

    Putting in the inequalities

    253wg + 148wu + 175wc + 160ws 175

    253(0.212) + 148(0.260) + 175(0) + 160(0.527) 175

    176 175

    Hence proved

    Now checking for E

    106.72wg+ 64.21wu+ 104.10wc+ 104.04ws-104.10E 0

    106.72(0.212) + 64.21(0.260) + 104.10(0) + 104.04(0.527) - 104.10(0.905) 0

    -0.06 0

    Hence proved

    s.no Constraints Limit Values

    Calculated

    Slack

    Min E ( Objective) 0.905

    1 wg + wu + wc+ ws = 1 1 1.000 0.000

    2 48.14wg + 34.62wu + 36.72wc + 33.16ws 36.72 36.72 36.720 0.000

    3 43.10wg + 27.11wu + 45.98wc + 56.46ws 45.98 45.98 45.980 0.000

    4 253wg + 148wu + 175wc + 160ws 175 175 176.615 1.615

    5 41wg + 27wu + 23wc + 84ws 23 23 60.027 37.027

    6 285.20wg+ 162.30wu+ 275.70wc+ 210.40ws-275.70E 0 0.00 -35.824 35.824

    7 123.80wg+ 128.70wu+ 348.50wc+ 154.10ws-348.50E 0 0.00 -174.422 174.422

    8 106.72wg+ 64.21wu+ 104.10wc+ 104.04ws-104.10E 0 0.00 0.000 0.000

    9 ws>0 0.00 0.527 0.000

    10 wg>0 0.00 0.212 0.000

    11 wc>0 0.00 0.000 0.000

    12 wu>0 0.00 0.260 0.00013 E>0 0.00 0.905 0.000

  • 8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final

    7/7

    7Saad Khawar Case Study - I - QMDM

    4. The conclusionGeneral hospital wg=0.212, University Hospital wu=0.260, State hospital ws=0.527 and County hospital

    wc=0.000. Each input and output of the composite hospital is determined by the same weighted average

    of the inputs and outputs of these three hospitals. The slack/surplus column provides some additional

    information about the efficiency of County hospital compared to the Composite hospital. Specifically,

    the Composite hospital has at least as much of each output as County hospital has (constraints 2-5) andprovides 1.6 more nurses trained (surplus for constraint 4) and 37 more interns trained (surplus for

    constraint 5). The slack of 0 from constraint 8 shows that the Composite hospital uses approximately

    90.5% of the bed-days used by County hospital. The slack values for constraints 6 & 7 shows that less

    than 90.5% of the FTE non physician and the supplies expense resources used at County hospital are

    used by Composite hospital.

    Clearly, the Composite hospital is more efficient then County hospital, and we are justified in concluding

    that County hospital is relatively inefficient compared to the other hospitals in the group. Given the

    results of the DEA analysis hospital administrators should examine operations to determine how County

    hospital resources can be more effectively utilized.