Upload
usama17
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final
1/7
REG NO 10045
Case Study
Quantitative Methods for Decision Making
Saad Khawar1/3/2010
The document includes solution to the case study given in class MBA-1 in first semester course QMDM
taught by Dr. Ahmed Ali Shah
Submitted to: Dr. Ahmed Ali Shah
8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final
2/7
2Saad Khawar Case Study - I - QMDM
1. Write summary of given and the result required?It is an application of linear programming used to measure the relative efficiency of operating units with
the same goals and objectives. This case is about the use Data Envelopment Analysis to measure the
relative efficiency of County hospital. For this purpose we have used a linear programming model to
construct a hypothetical composite hospital based on the outputs and inputs for the four hospitals inthe problem. For each operating unit that we want to measure the efficiency of, we must formulate and
solve a linear programming model similar to the linear program we solved to measure the relative
efficiency of County Hospital. The following step by step procedure should help you in formulating a
linear programming model for other types of DEA applications. Note that the operating unit we want to
measure the relative efficiency of is referred to as the jth operating unit.
8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final
3/7
3Saad Khawar Case Study - I - QMDM
2. The theory used in setting the equationsA linear programming model is developed for each hospital whose efficiency has to be evaluated. Then a
composite hospital is created based on the outputs and inputs for all the four hospitals.
Output Measures
y Patient-days of service under Medicarey Patient-days of service not under Medicarey Number of nurses trainedy Number of interns trained
Input Measures
y The number of full-time equivalent (FTE) non physician personnely The amount spent on suppliesy The number of bed-days available
Variables to be determined
wg weight applied to inputs and outputs for General Hospital
wu weight applied to inputs and outputs for University Hospital
wc weight applied to inputs and outputs for County Hospital
ws weight applied to inputs and outputs for State Hospital
Constraints
The DEA approach requires that the sum of these weights equal 1. Thus, the first constraint is
wg +wu +wc +ws = 1
Output Constraints
Medicare Patient-Days for
composite hospital
= (Medicare Patient-Days for General Hospital)*wg +
(Medicare Patient-Days for County Hospital)*wc +
(Medicare Patient-Days for University hospital)*wu +
(Medicare Patient-Days for state hospital)*ws +
8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final
4/7
4Saad Khawar Case Study - I - QMDM
Medicare patient-days
for Composite Hospital
The other output measures for the composite hospital are computed in a similar fashion.
General Format for the output
constraints
Output for the composite hospital >= Output for county hospital
Medicare Patient days 48.14 wg + 34.62 wu + 36.72 wc + 33.16 ws >= 36.72
Non medicare patient days 43.10 wg + 27.11 wu + 45.98 wc + 56.46 ws >= 45.98
Nurses 253 wg+148 wu+175 wc+l60 ws >= 175
Interns 41 wg+27 wu+23 wc+84 ws >= 23
Input Constraints
FTE nonphysicians
for Composite Hospital
The other input measures for the composite hospital are computed in a similar fashion.
General Format for the input
constraints
Output for the composite hospital >= Output for county hospital
FTE physicians 285.20wg + 162.30wu + 275.70wc + 210.40ws
Supple Expense 123.80wg + 128.70wu + 348.50wc + 154.10ws
Bed-days 106.70wg + 64.21wu + 104.10wc + 104.04ws
Objective Function
Minimize E = the fraction of County Hospitals input available to the composite hospital
E is also known as efficiency index
The input constraint corresponding to FTE non physicians, supplies and bed-days:
285.20wg + 162.30wu +275.70wc+210.40ws
8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final
5/7
5Saad Khawar Case Study - I - QMDM
48.14wg+ 34.62wu +36.72wc+33.16ws >=36.72
43.10wg+ 27.11wu +45.98wc+33.16ws >=45.98
253wg + 148wu +175wc + 160ws >=175
41wg + 27wu +23wc + 84ws >=23
123.80wg+ 128.70wu +348.50wc+154.10ws
8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final
6/7
6Saad Khawar Case Study - I - QMDM
Proof
wg 0.212
wu 0.260
ws 0.527
wc 0.000
E 0.905
Putting in the inequalities
253wg + 148wu + 175wc + 160ws 175
253(0.212) + 148(0.260) + 175(0) + 160(0.527) 175
176 175
Hence proved
Now checking for E
106.72wg+ 64.21wu+ 104.10wc+ 104.04ws-104.10E 0
106.72(0.212) + 64.21(0.260) + 104.10(0) + 104.04(0.527) - 104.10(0.905) 0
-0.06 0
Hence proved
s.no Constraints Limit Values
Calculated
Slack
Min E ( Objective) 0.905
1 wg + wu + wc+ ws = 1 1 1.000 0.000
2 48.14wg + 34.62wu + 36.72wc + 33.16ws 36.72 36.72 36.720 0.000
3 43.10wg + 27.11wu + 45.98wc + 56.46ws 45.98 45.98 45.980 0.000
4 253wg + 148wu + 175wc + 160ws 175 175 176.615 1.615
5 41wg + 27wu + 23wc + 84ws 23 23 60.027 37.027
6 285.20wg+ 162.30wu+ 275.70wc+ 210.40ws-275.70E 0 0.00 -35.824 35.824
7 123.80wg+ 128.70wu+ 348.50wc+ 154.10ws-348.50E 0 0.00 -174.422 174.422
8 106.72wg+ 64.21wu+ 104.10wc+ 104.04ws-104.10E 0 0.00 0.000 0.000
9 ws>0 0.00 0.527 0.000
10 wg>0 0.00 0.212 0.000
11 wc>0 0.00 0.000 0.000
12 wu>0 0.00 0.260 0.00013 E>0 0.00 0.905 0.000
8/9/2019 Qmdm Case Final
7/7
7Saad Khawar Case Study - I - QMDM
4. The conclusionGeneral hospital wg=0.212, University Hospital wu=0.260, State hospital ws=0.527 and County hospital
wc=0.000. Each input and output of the composite hospital is determined by the same weighted average
of the inputs and outputs of these three hospitals. The slack/surplus column provides some additional
information about the efficiency of County hospital compared to the Composite hospital. Specifically,
the Composite hospital has at least as much of each output as County hospital has (constraints 2-5) andprovides 1.6 more nurses trained (surplus for constraint 4) and 37 more interns trained (surplus for
constraint 5). The slack of 0 from constraint 8 shows that the Composite hospital uses approximately
90.5% of the bed-days used by County hospital. The slack values for constraints 6 & 7 shows that less
than 90.5% of the FTE non physician and the supplies expense resources used at County hospital are
used by Composite hospital.
Clearly, the Composite hospital is more efficient then County hospital, and we are justified in concluding
that County hospital is relatively inefficient compared to the other hospitals in the group. Given the
results of the DEA analysis hospital administrators should examine operations to determine how County
hospital resources can be more effectively utilized.