Upload
brody-wilcock
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
QFH Consulting, LLC
Business Development & Capture Management
Lean Six Sigma Program Deployment & Management
IT Program Management & Program Performance
QFH
What We Bring to Organization
Executive Levels ofBusiness DevelopmentProgram Management& Quality Assurance
ContinuousProcess Improvement
Program Management
• Program Performance Management Compliance to KPIs
• Coordinate Program & performance Reviews
• “Yellow-Red” Recovery
• EVM Support
• Lean Six Sigma Program
• Certifications/Assessments/
• Core Process Deployment
• Lean Six Sigma Training
LSS for Leadership
Green Belt and Black Belt
• Operational Excellence Group and IPTs
• Chair – OPG (CMMI, ITIL)
OPG - OrganizationalProcess Group
CEG - Capture Excellence Group
Business Development
• Capture Management Training
• Capture Excellence
• Subcontractor Management
• Chair - CEG
Leadership and Performance at a Senior Level
Capture ElementsCapture Manager levelsCapture Management BOKCore BD processesCompetitive IntelligenceCustomer Value Proposition
BD TrainingLean Collaboration EnvironmentsRequirements DefinitionDFSS - QFD and TKO
Lean Six Sigma (LSS) deploymentMission Success VisionCustomer Relations and IntimacyMid-Course ReviewsProgram Failure ModesTKOs for BD or PM
LSS Training - LLT - GB - BBLSS DeploymentLSS for CustomersWorkbench and ToolkitUSS Nimitz / InternationalRoot Cause Analysis
We Offer Enterprise Training
Business Development
Lean Six Sigma (LSS)
Enterprise WideLean Six Sigma
Deployment
Lean Six Sigma Accomplishments
AWE - UK Ceramic Lab Labor & Materials processing $ 3.5MAWE - UK Reading Proposal for MOD $ 15M valueNAVAIR AirSpeed USS Nimitz Onboard Kaizens Unknown USS Nimitz Oil Change Kaizen $ 18M/yr Oceana NAS Supply Chain Mgmt $ 0.8M/yrNSIPS, New Orleans S/W Refresh S/W Refresh process $ 11M / yrDHS, USCIS USCIS, I-94 VSM Baseline for metrics N/A USCIS, I-94 I-94 QA Process 50% reduction in errorsNASA ODIN LaRC Seat Mgmt/Refresh 80% reduction in turn-around 45% reduction in resolution time established 18 month "Pilot" cycleNASA ODIN Huntsville Seat Mgmt/Refresh 50% reduction in problem resolution 1st of rollout to 10 sites, similar results
DTRAService Desk Mgmt ITIL management VSM Established 200+ metric points
ITSM Tier Kaizen 65% reduction in response time 55% reduction in resolution time
LM IS&GSProp Ops (POPS) Human Resource Utilization $ 3M / yr savings
LM IS&GSProp Ops (POPS) TKO in Reqs Analysis est. 30% win rate increase
Energy - utilitiesREC, NOVA, SMEC Customer response time 65% increase in satisfaction
PolyOne Industrial QA Kaizen - sampling 45% decrease in product returns
6
Highlights as a LSS Practitioner
• $20M savings for US Navy over 2 years w/ two SIAs NSIPS)
• Lean Six Sigma adopted by USAF – AFSO21 (Lead)
• Lean Six Sigma Program manager – Operating Excellence
• Personally requested by international customers (AWE-UK)
• $18M savings for a $7 fix – NAVAIR AIRSpeed
OPG=Organizational Process GroupCMMI=Capability Maturity Model – IntegratedITIL=Information Technology Infrastructure LibraryISO=International Standards OrganizationVSM=Value Stream Mapping
Continuous Process Improvement Life Cycle
PAL(Process Asset
Library)
Gap AnalysisImprovement Events
& Projects
Lean Six Sigma ProgramPolicies
QMS
Deploy
Review (OPG, IPT, Stakeholder)Adjust
CommandMedia and Training Update PEP Plan with
Deployment Schedule
Build Current State VSM (PAL media)
CMMI Process Areas
ISO Clauses
ITIL Best Practices
CustomerNeeds
Project Needs
Core PM Processes
We Will Help Increase Your ROI (Return on Investment)
ROICROIC
COGS
Revenue
WorkingCapital
OP
ER
AT
ING
EX
CE
LL
EN
CE
Exe
cuti
on
Sav
ing
sE
ffic
ien
cies Fixed
Assets
Goodwill
Income
Investment
÷ =
-
+
=
=
+
%Complete
Deliveries
Milestones
Services
Labor
Material
Overhead
Orders/Pricing
Systems
Facilities
Equipment
Receivables
Payables/Advances
Inventory
AcquisitionsThe arrow indicates the direction that the particular dollars, percentages, or days need to move to increase ROIC.
We Can Leverage LSS for CMMI, ISO, or ITIL
5 Optimizing
4 Quantitatively Managed
3 Defined
2 Managed
1 Performed
0 Incomplete
Level 3 requires objective evidence against an “organization” (approximately 12 months worth) to demonstrate a defined managed process.
Lean Six Sigma quantitative metrics support Level 4 and data-driven continual improvement is Level 5
An entire organization must rate at least Level 3, while individual processes may be awarded Level 4 or 5 maturity status
Support for Program
Management
Process Improvement Capture management
Program PerformanceMid-Course ReviewBusiness Growth
Customer Relationship Management
Our Typical Program Support
Program Manger
BusinessMgt
Operations Engineering
Small/Mid-size ProgramImprovement
Leadership Team
Blackbelts
Major Program or
Business Area
A tailored solution for your business needs!
Program Executive
BusinessMgt
OperationsEngineering
Lean Six Sigma Program Director
Black Belt
Support for Program Management Processes
Project PlanningRoad Map, Excellence
Plan, PM Plan
Project PlanningRoad Map, Excellence
Plan, PM Plan
Performance Meas.SLA and Operational
Performance
Performance Meas.SLA and Operational
Performance
Monitor & ControlMS & EV tracking,
Customer Satisfaction
Monitor & ControlMS & EV tracking,
Customer Satisfaction
Risk Mgt.Risk/Opportunity Assessment, TKO
Risk Mgt.Risk/Opportunity Assessment, TKO
Requirements Mgt.Stakeholder Needs
traced to deliverables
Requirements Mgt.Stakeholder Needs
traced to deliverables
Configuration Mgt.Governance, CCB,
Accounting & Reporting
Configuration Mgt.Governance, CCB,
Accounting & Reporting
Quality AssuranceCustomer and Company
Standards
Quality AssuranceCustomer and Company
Standards
Subcontract MgtIPT Oriented
Value Stream Focused
Subcontract MgtIPT Oriented
Value Stream Focused
Training• PAL: Self Paced
Modules• Lean Six Sigma• Capture Management• BD & Capture
Management Processes
Program Reviews• Qtrly, Independant,
Performance Reviews• DFSS: Risk Mgmt.
Action Plans• Program Excellence
Plan• Program Roadmap• Year One Plan
ProcedureWork
Product
StandardGuidelines
Role
1.0 -------------------
2. 0----------
Template
Process Components
Checklist
Training Module
ProcedureWork
Product
StandardGuidelines
Role
1.0 -------------------
2. 0----------
Template
Process Components
Checklist
Training Module
Ensure Consistent Outstanding Performance
8 Core Processes of Program Management (CMMI Compliant)
Reducing Program RiskThrough TKO
(Technical Kick Off)Boundary Diagram
DFMEA
PFMEA
ParameterDiagram
QFD
Structured
Process
Support of Risk Management
• The TKO process is an accelerated, structured process for identifying risk early in the program/subcontract lifecycle
Identify key actions to reduce program/subcontract riskIdentify key actions to reduce program/subcontract risk
• Using a structured process, proven tools, in collaborative environment, TKO provide the ability to:
• Pull technical risk further forward in the Design process• Surface potential failure modes for critical technical
parameters• Capture a quantifiable technical risk baseline• Feeds the program’s risk management process• Reinforces multi-functional acknowledgement, concurrence
and accountability of technical risk• Further integrates the team (SMT or IPT) increased
understanding of mutual objectives
TKO/PKO Overview
Knowledge Development & Training
Leadership Support &
Pilot Deployment
Leadership & Organizational Planning Initiation
Growth & Feedback
Deployment
Organizational Adoption through Process & Culture
Identifying Facilitator Candidates
Initial Briefings, Resource Authorization
Establishing Goals and Planning Deployment
Review and Capture of Results, Expanding Across Organization
Integration into Business Processes and upfront Planning
Dynamic Augmentation & Sustainment
Assess Business Current and Future Needs and TKO/PKO Capability
Pilot and Develop New Applications
TKO/PKO Strategic Deployment Model
Acquiring Tools and Training
Establish Champions and Organizational Coordination
Initiate Metrics Collection and Review Rhythms
Obtain Higher Maturity
Deployment
Timing and Types of the TKO
We Help You AvoidThe Common
Program Failure Modes
GAO – Why programs Fail
RequirementsInstability
(Influence)
Contractor Performance
(Control)
Funding Instability
(Influence)
• *1996 -2005 congressional changes to procurement Requests is 20 - 30 %
• *Requirements, budget and Acquisition processes are not connected organizationally.
• *Tenure and experience lacking
• Red and yellow program tracking
- Systems & software - SCM - Program Transition /
Start up
Pain point – root cause and Countermeasure required
Not optimal – continuous Improvement required
Watch item – LSI, Keep Sold programs,fixed priced development
* Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment Report – 2006
Four Program Failure Modesin the IT Federal Sector
• SW Engineering Requirements• Customer Requirements• Subcontract Management• Start-up/Transition
Common Program Failure Modes
Leverage of Lean Six Sigma methodologies along with Best Practices can reduce or eliminate these failures
In Summary … We Bring …
• Executive level advisory and support role
• Accomplished Capture Management
• Enterprise level Lean Six Sigma Deployment and Practice
• Integration of LSS and Business Development
• Program Management – EVM
• Risk Management – Requirements Analysis
• International experience (LSS and BD)
Integration of Lean Six Sigma with Business Development and Program Management leads to sustained performance and business growth.
– “This is What I Do” (qfh)
QFH