46
Fuel E ciency MANUAL

Q400 Manual

  • Upload
    ckbt76

  • View
    805

  • Download
    30

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Q400 Manual

Citation preview

Page 1: Q400 Manual

Fuel E!ciency

MANUAL

Page 2: Q400 Manual

CO

NTE

NTS

1."Introduction 3

2."Abbreviations 5

3."Summary of Techniques 8

4."Flight Planning 114.1"Aircraft Weight 124.2"Center of Gravity (CG) 144.3"Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) 144.4"Taxi 154.5"Take-O# 174.6"Climb 174.7"Cruise 194.8"Descent 234.9"Optimum Cruise Altitude 254.10"Fuel Reserves and Contingency Fuel 274.11"Flight Planning Example 28

5."Higher Resolution of SAR Data Using Cost Index Tables 30

6."Flight Management 356.1"Enroute Winds 366.2"Performance Monitoring 376.3"Approach and Landing 386.4"Tankering 38

7."Maintenance 397.1"Airframe Maintenance 407.2"Engine Maintenance 407.3"Dispatch under MEL and CDL 42

8."Conclusion 45

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual ! 2

Page 3: Q400 Manual

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 3

INTRODUCTION

Page 4: Q400 Manual

2.0!I

NTR

OD

UC

TIO

N

B!ombardier’s Q400 NextGen turboprop aircraft has benefited from an ongoing program of investment and continuous improvement. Since 2000, when the Q400 entered service, the price of fuel has risen

significantly. Airlines are continually seeking solutions to counter the impact of rising fuel costs and economic challenges. Bombardier has developed a broad range of solutions and countermeasures to the rising cost of fuel. The Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual serves as a guide for airlines to maximize their opera-tional and performance techniques, enabling them to generate significant fuel savings across all mission profiles and phases of flight.

The Q400 NextGen airliner, which is built at Bombardier’s Toronto, Canada facility, is the most recent development in the evolution of the Q400 aircraft, and the advanced successor to Bombardier’s Dash 8/Q-Series family of aircraft. The Q400 airliner was developed after the introduction of regional jets and is the only turboprop designed to meet the modern definition of regional flying. Optimized for short-haul regional operations the 70-to-86-seat Q400 NextGen aircraft is a large, fast, quiet and fuel-e!cient turbo-prop. Now available with seating configurations up to 86 seats, the Q400 provides an un-matched combination of productivity, passenger comfort and operating economics with a reduced environmental footprint.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 4

Page 5: Q400 Manual

2.0!I

NTR

OD

UC

TIO

N The Q400 aircraft is most often used on routes of 200 to 500 NM. As a modern turboprop, it also has the speed and range to be deployed on routes up to 1000 NM. The Q400 aircraft’s maximum cruise speed of 360 knots TAS lets the aircraft fly on demand-driven interchangeable schedules with jets. But, throttle back to 280 knots TAS and the Q400 aircraft is the most fuel e!cient turboprop on a per-seat basis, while providing advantages in operating cost, speed, passenger capacity and baggage capacity. The Q400 turboprop delivers the operational flexibility and operating economics to meet the needs of regional flying in the modern era.

Setting new environmental standards, the Q400 aircraft uses 30 to 40 per cent less fuel and produces 30 to 40 per cent fewer emissions on routes where it has replaced similar-capacity, older jets. Importantly, the Q400 turboprops Auxiliary Power Unit (APU), located in the tail of the aircraft, vents its exhaust and noise upward, resulting in a better operating environ-ment for ground crews. Overall, the Q400 aircraft is 15 decibels quieter than ICAO Chapter 4 noise standards; raising the bar for the entire industry. The Q400 aircraft is also participating in biofuel test programs that could make a significant contribution in reducing aviation’s carbon footprint.

The Q400 aircraft’s high rate of climb, single-engine service ceiling, higher take-o" weight (thus greater payload), optional drop down oxygen system and jetway-compatibile front air stair passenger door are important factors that contribute to its operational flexibility. In addition, the Q400’s indus-try leading navigation capabilities, such as WAAS/LPV, RNP AR, Heads-up guidance, Coupled VNAV etc contribute to the e!ciency of operations and flight completion rates in challenging environments.

The commercial aviation industry has gone through significant changes since the recent global recession. The industry’s unwavering focus on opti-mization and e!ciency is the key reason for its resilience. Economic growth will drive the demand for more aircraft. Rising oil prices and continued price volatility will drive airlines to accelerate the retirement of older less e!cient aircraft, thereby increasing the demand for new-technology and fuel- e!cient aircraft such as the Q400. The Q400 FEH will help airlines find the optimum fuel e!ciency solutions for today’s challenges, and it provides the tools to adapt to tomorrow’s challenges as well.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 5

Page 6: Q400 Manual

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 6

ABBREVIATIONS

Page 7: Q400 Manual

1.0!A

BB

RE

VIA

TIO

NS A/C Aircraft

AEO All Engines Operating AFM Airplane Flight Manual AOM Airplane Operating Manual APU Auxiliary Power Unit BA BOMBARDIER AEROSPACE CG Center of Gravity CI Cost Index FPM Feet Per Minute FT, ft Feet GPU Ground Power Unit HSC High Speed Cruise IAS Indicated Air Speed IATA International Air Transport Association IFR Instrument Flight Rules ISC Intermediate Speed Cruise ISA International Standard Atmosphere KG, kg Kilogram LB, lb Pound LRC Long Range Cruise ME Maximum Endurance MCL Maximum Climb Power Rating MCR Maximum Cruise Power Rating MIN, min Minute MLG Main Landing Gear MMEL Master Minimum Equipment List MRC Maximum Range Cruise MTOW Maximum Take-O" Weight NLG Nose Landing Gear NM, nm Nautical Mile OEI One Engine Inoperative ROD Rate Of Descent RPM Revolutions Per Minute SAR Specific Air Range SE Single Engine TAS True Air Speed TOC Top Of Climb TOD Top Of Descent TOW Take-O" Weight USG U. S. Gallon

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual ! 7

Page 8: Q400 Manual

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual ! 8

SUMMARY OF TECHNIQUES

Page 9: Q400 Manual

3.0!S

UM

MA

RY

OF

TEC

HN

IQU

ES A!lthough fuel price and emissions costs have become very important

operational factors, it is important to remember that a minimum fuel optimized operation is not necessarily the best for every oper-

ator, since there are factors and situations that can diminish or negate the fuel saving benefits, such as:

• Ine"ective use of the APU• Start-up delays and taxi speeds• High time-related costs (maintenance, flight and cabin crew, leasing, etc.)• Missing or unfiled ATC clearances• Missing slot times• Airspace access or overflight costs• Passenger related delay costs (missing connecting flights)• Not taking advantage of en-route winds• Reduced weather avoidance capabilities• Poor scheduling• Crew understanding and compliance

For these reasons many operators use a minimum cost strategy. All aspects of fuel e!ciency, such as fuel price, cost of emissions, fuel weight and tankering can be included in a Cost Index method, which is a method to minimize total operational cost as a function of all or a selection of operating variables.

As the purpose of this manual is to focus on fuel e!ciency, it will first show the minimum fuel techniques for ground operations and for each flight seg-ment (climb, cruise, descent, approach and landing), with the understand-ing that optimizing each flight segment does not always mean that the trip is optimized; this is further explained in the flight level selection section. It is up to the operator or flight planning provider to use this knowledge and data to optimize the overall flight profile.

Next, a few Cost Index methods are explained, followed by practical flight management recommendations and maintenance implications on fuel burn.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 9

Page 10: Q400 Manual

Summary – Fuel Burn Reduction Techniques12

1 Individual techniques are not additive and results will vary according to particular conditions2 Based on 500 NM

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 1 03.

0!S

UM

MA

RY

OF

TEC

HN

IQU

ES

Technique Block Fuel Saving PotentialAircraft Weight Management Up to 1%C of G Management Up to 0.5%APU Usage Up to 0.7%Single Engine Taxi Up to 3%Climb Technique Up to 6%Cruise Technique Up to 12%Descent Technique Up to 5%FL270 Operation Up to 3%Fuel Reserves and Contingency Fuel Up to 1%Higher Resolution SAR data Up to 2%Enroute Winds Up to 15%Visual Approaches Up to 0.5%Tankering Up to 1%RNP AR Approaches Up to 3.0%Airframe Maintenance Up to 1%Engine Maintenance Up to 0.5%

Page 11: Q400 Manual

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual! 1 1

FLIGHT PLANNING

Page 12: Q400 Manual

4.0

!FLI

GH

T P

LAN

NIN

G A!flight plan that is accurate in all its components (ground operations, climb, acceleration, cruise, descent, approach & landing, reserves and contingency factors) is critical for fuel e!ciency. Optimized

routing must be examined, taking into consideration any en-route fees that may be charged as a result of specific routings. Any optimization bene-fit must be balanced against the need for accurate and e!cient on-time performance for passenger movements and connections. The impact of a non-optimal flight planning or carrying unnecessary fuel is multiple:

• cost of additional fuel• more emissions (CO2, NO)• additional fuel weight leading to reduced performance, in turn leading

to further limitations and additional fuel required• payload reduction – when limited by MTOW

4.1"Aircraft WeightAircraft weight is one of the key factors in determining the fuel burn. Starting with an accurate weight on the ground and continuing to have a correct fuel consumption and aircraft weight estimate for all flight segments will allow the aircraft route to be planned and flown e"ectively.

As much as possible, it is recommended to reduce the aircraft weight, as any excess weight is always detrimental to fuel e!ciency. The chart below shows the Block Fuel3 increment associated with TOW increase, for a medium sector distance (450 nm).

3 Block Fuel includes: start , taxi-out, take-o! , climb, cruise, descent , approach, landing, taxi-in

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 1 2

Page 13: Q400 Manual

4.1!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING For example, if take-o" weight is increased by 1% from 58,000lbs to

58,580lbs and with a HSC setting the block fuel will increase by 0.51%, which translates into 16lbs of fuel.

When the take-o" weight is increased, there will be an increase in block fuel. The table below o"ers some examples of the fuel increase with an addi-tional take-o" weight increase of 1000 lb.

300 nm 450 nm 600 nmLRC 16 – 20 lb 25 – 29 lb 32 – 39 lbHSC 6 – 10 lb 7 – 13 lb 9 – 15 lb

An aircraft weight reduction can be achieved by minimizing each of its com-ponents: Operating Weight Empty (OWE), payload and fuel.

The OWE is the Manufacturer’s Empty Weight (MEW) plus operational items. This would include flight crew and their baggage, passenger service items, manuals, galley supplies, carts, supplementary equipment, and con-sumables – food, water, etc. An audit should be conducted to ensure only essential items are carried. The following items could be minimized or removed entirely:

• Old magazines and newspapers• Empty galley containers, extra supplies• Excess duty free material (consider removing this entirely)• Extra water in storage tanks• Pillows and blankets• Excessive flight crew baggage• Extra magazines, seatback advertising• Heavy seats, carpets, spare equipment• Flight manuals and documentation (consider an Electronic Flight Bag• Potable water weight implications under normal and MEL use

The MEW tends to increase during operational life due to repairs, upgrades and moisture accumulation. These weight increments should be monitored and kept to a minimum.

• Consider drying out insulation• Keep the aircraft clean and free of dirt (inside and out)• Infrequent lavatory servicing

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 1 3

Page 14: Q400 Manual

4.1!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING The Payload weight (passenger + carry-on baggage + checked baggage)

should be accurately assessed by statistical or other methods.• Where feasible, use actual weights of passengers and baggage• Assumed or average weights may be limiting• Optimize weight and balance calculations• Avoid zonal calculations due to curtailment requirements• More zones provide a more precise calculation

The total Fuel quantity on board is discussed in Section 4.11.

4.2"Center of Gravity (CG)The Q400 AOM cruise data is produced based on the aircraft loaded to the Forward CG Limit. There is lower drag if the aircraft is loaded aft of the forward limit. The drag reduction improves the fuel burn by approximately 0.04% per 1% MAC change in CG position.

That is approximately 0.76% fuel burn improvement in cruise for a CG shift from full forward (17%) to full aft (36%), for an aircraft weight of 28690 kg (63250 lb). The e"ect is reduced for lighter weights (linearly scaled by weight). For a 1 hour flight at MRC this translates in 3.6 kg (8 lb) fuel saved in cruise.

4.3"Auxiliary Power Unit (APU)The Q400 APU/Bleed combination uses an average 1.5 kg/minute (3.3 lb/minute) of fuel. The fuel burn is reduced by almost half when the Bleed Air is selected OFF. There is great potential to save fuel and reduce maintenance costs by reducing APU useage, and the useage of bleed air from the APU.

APU and Bleed Air (22 deg C) 103 kg/hr (227 lb/hr) or 1.7 kg/min (3.8 lb/min)

APU Only (22 deg C) 53.5 kg/hr (118 lb/hr) or 0.9 kg/min (2 lb/min)

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 1 4

Page 15: Q400 Manual

4.3!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING 4Excessive use of the APU can be caused by the following:

• Inadequate SOP’s detailing the use of the APU• Ground electrical power unavailable• Ground air conditioning unavailable• APU Bleed used on unattended aircraft• APU Generator used on unattended aircraft• Maintenance action using APU instead of Ground Power• APU used for longer turnaround times (greater than 1 hour)

Consider reduction of APU usage when environmental conditions allow (suf-ficient ambient light and comfortable cabin temperature) and avoid early starting or running during extended turnarounds. Further, consider closing window shades/blinds to minimize thermal heating in the cabin. Ensure all vents are open in the flight deck and cabin to maximize the heating/cooling e"ects when the APU Bleed is operating.

When available, the crew should consider the use of Ground Power Unit (GPU) and air carts when practical and economical, considering cost, time delays, and noise.

4.4"Taxi

Engine StartStarting engines during the pushback phase, instead of at the gate may minimize the fuel burn. However, this would require the APU to be operating or would require a battery only start. Starting one engine at the gate while on ground power and then pushing back may be the best alternative and most e!cient method. Delaying the start of the second engine until just prior to the completion of the pushback procedure will provide additional savings.

Consider holding the start and pushback procedure if a departure delay is anticipated.

4 Sector distance: 274nm, cruise segment 197nm, fuel used in cruise: 1056lb

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 1 5

Page 16: Q400 Manual

4.4

!FLI

GH

T P

LAN

NIN

G Single Engine TaxiThe Q400 average fuel burn for Two Engine Taxi is approximately 12 lb/minute.

The Single Engine Taxi Operations – Considerations and Procedures are presented in the Q400 AOM, Section 3.4.3.11. The potential fuel savings (for 1 engine operating, one engine shutdown) are on the order of 40% for the Start and Taxi fuel.

For example, a standard departure that includes a two engine start followed by a 15 minute taxi will result in a fuel burn of 92.5 kg (204 lb). A single engine start, followed by a 15 minute taxi and delayed second engine start will consume approximately 54.4 kg (120 lb) of fuel.

Taxi-outWhen multiple runways are available, choose a runway that will minimize taxi and ground holding times. However, it may be more beneficial to choose a runway that is aligned with the initial en route heading, even though it may take longer to taxi. The fuel burn on the ground is much less than the fuel required to depart in the opposite direction and make the turn en route while airborne.

Consider the use of intersection departures where applicable to minimize taxi time. Where possible, choose the most direct taxiing route from gate to runway.

Taxi-inSingle engine taxi operations could be employed during the taxi-in phase as well. A reduction in fuel consumption, pollution, noise and brake wear is possible. It is important that the flight crew consider taxiway surface condi-tions, taxi time, ramp and parking congestion before employing this strategy.

When waiting excessively for a stand or gate after landing (after the AFTER LANDING checklist is complete), the crew may opt to select START/FEATHER on both Condition Levers. The loss of A/C power has no subsequent e"ect on the remaining taxi. The di"erence between DISC/1020 rpm and START/FEATHER is approximately 90 kg/hour (198.4 lb). Once the gate becomes available, return the Condition Levers to 1020 RPM and wait for the propellers to unfeather before continuing to taxi.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual

Page 17: Q400 Manual

4.5!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING 4.5"Take-O#

Supplement 13 – “Reduced Power” take-o" may result in lower overall engine operating costs as a result of the lower engine temperatures. The fuel burn benefits of the lower power settings become o"set by the extra time required for acceleration on the ground and when airborne. The benefits of Supplement 13 are specific to the circumstances of individual airline operations.

4.6"ClimbQ400 can continuously climb from SL to its maximum operational ceiling (25000 ft) for any combination of take-o" weight, temperature and propeller RPM. No step climbs are required.

The following climb techniques are currently provided in the Q400 AOM:

• Climb Type 1 (High Speed): is using the most fuel but it takes more time and the longest distance to Top of Climb (TOC).

• Climb Type 2 (Intermediate Speed): is a speed approximately halfway between Type 1 and Type 3 climb speeds, and the times, distances and fuel are approximately averages of the times, distances and fuel to TOC of Type 1 and Type 3.

• Climb Type 3 (Low Speed): is using the least fuel, it takes the least time and the shortest distance to TOC (best climb gradient).

• In addition, a Pitch Attitude climb (higher indicated speed, low pitch) is also considered, as some operators use this technique due to ATC/operational considerations.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 1 7

Page 18: Q400 Manual

4.6!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING The climb speed profiles are shown below, in Indicated Air Speed. The Con-

stant Pitch Attitude climb and Type 1 climbs overlap or exceed (in some areas) the LRC speed. This suggests that for those conditions these high climb speeds are not the best for a minimum fuel technique, since the climb is performed at MCL (Maximum Climb power), a power rating which is higher than any cruise power.

In order to minimize fuel burn for the climb segment, the most fuel e!cient is Climb Type 3. For example, using Type 3 climb instead of Type 1 from SL to FL 160 will save 217 kg (478.4 lb) – 206 kg (454.1 lb) = 11 kg (24.3 lb) which represents 5% in the climb segment. However, upon reaching the Top Of Climb, the cruise segment will have to be extended to reach the same point downstream of the Type 1 Top Of Climb. The overall impact of climb/cruise fuel burn will have to be assessed when optimizing the flight profile.

In addition, climbing at 900 RPM instead of 850 RPM saves fuel by an aver-age 0.5% for the climb segment. The climb time, distance, and fuel data for all climb types are presented in the AOM for both 850 and 900 propeller RPM. With the same example conditions as above, but using 900 propeller RPM instead of 850 RPM, using Type 3 climb instead of Type 1 will save 213 kg (469.6 lb) – 201 kg (443.1 lb) = 12 kg (26.5 lb) which represents 5.6% in the climb segment.5

5 ISA, 850 RPM, 28000kg (61730 lb)

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 1 8

Page 19: Q400 Manual

4.7!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING 4.7"Cruise

The Q400 AOM presents fuel flow, speed and torque in tabular format for specific weight, altitude and temperature increments for the following:

• Maximum Endurance cruise (ME)• Maximum Range Cruise (MRC)• Long Range Cruise (LRC)• Intermediate Speed Cruise (ISC)• High Speed Cruise (HSC)• Maximum Cruise Rating (MCR)

The tabular data in the AOM is derived from charts similar to the exam-ple provided below. This chart highlights the Specific Air Range (nm/lb of fuel) for 3 di"erent weights, and is valid specifically for ISA temperatures at FL250. The various cruise speed options (listed above) have been added to the chart for convenience.

Weights 18000 kg (39683 lb)

24000 kg (52911 lb)

29574 kg (65200 lb)

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 1 9

Page 20: Q400 Manual

4.7!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING The best cruise SAR (best fuel e!ciency) is achieved at MRC speed as high-

lighted below. Simply put, it will provide the furthest distance traveled for a given amount of fuel burned.

LRC has been historically defined as the speed above MRC that will result in 1% SAR reduction. The benefit of using LRC is that 1% of SAR is traded for 3% to 5% higher cruise speed. The minor fuel burn increase is o"set by the increase in speed and cruise time reduction.

18000 KG (39683 LB)

Cruise Setting Speed (KTAS) SAR (nm/lb)MRC 252 0.2107LRC 271 0.2086

In contrast, the least fuel e!cient but fastest jet-like operation is at MCR (minimum time). Flying at HSC will trade a small speed reduction (20 kt) for a significant SAR improvement (7%). The ISC makes a compromise between a fuel e!cient operation and time e!cient operation, and is defined as the average speed between LRC and HSC.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 2 0

Page 21: Q400 Manual

4.7!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING

29574 KG (65200 LB)

Cruise Setting Speed (KTAS) SAR (nm/lb)MCR 355 0.1426HSC 335 0.1527

For a relatively short trip, Toronto (CYYZ) to Montreal (CYUL), the fuel savings achieved in cruise when using MRC instead of MCR is 24.2%6, for an increase in cruise time of 11.6 minutes (35.3%).

Similarly, on a relatively long route, Toronto (CYYZ) to Halifax (CYHZ), the fuel savings achieved when using MRC instead of MCR is also 24%7. The increase in cruise time is 33.5 minutes (35.3%).

6 ISA, FL250, 24000 kg cruise weight, 274 nm total distance (cruise portion 197 nm), Type 3 climb/descent

7 ISA, FL250, 24000 kg cruise weight, 697 nm total distance (cruise portion 569 nm), Type 3 climb/descent

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 2 1

Page 22: Q400 Manual

4.7!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING If saving fuel in cruise is most important and overall flight time is not a con-

cern8, the flight crew can use speeds even lower than MRC, leading to fur-ther fuel burn reductions. This is illustrated in the following chart, which is showing the same data as above, but presented in terms of fuel flow (lb/hr).

For flight planning (cruise segment only, or the climb/cruise/descent profile) it is important to remember that fuel consumption has to be continuously interpolated and integrated along the flight path using appropriate software as the aircraft weight, speed, engine power and ambient conditions are con-tinuously changing. The final results are not always intuitive or comparable when checking against discrete fuel consumption values or hand calcula-tions. The data and discrete values are provided by Bombardier in the AOM. Bombardier has developed and is o"ering additional & refined performance data in our cost index data package.

8 Factors may include favorable enroute tailwinds, fixed arrival time, unavailable/early arrival slots; short sectors and short cruise sections; flight schedules; or to provide slower speeds, similar to competition turboprop aircraft.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 2 2

Page 23: Q400 Manual

4.8!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING 4.8"Descent

A properly planned and executed descent profile can o"er some of the greatest fuel savings. The ideal profile would include an uninterrupted descent from cruise altitude without the use of any power. This is often unachievable in busy airspace. Descents that begin too early or late can also increase the fuel burn. If given a choice, it would be better to begin the descent early, rather than late. An early (shallow) descent a"ords the oppor-tunity to regain the optimal profile and find savings in fuel. A late descent will require in increased rate of descent from the optimal profile, and this added energy would eventually have to be dissipated through alternative means – increasing drag, increasing propeller RPM, or a premature level o".

The following descent types are currently provided in the Q400 AOM:

• Descent Type 1, limited by a/c ROD=2000fpm and/or cabin ROD=300fpm

• Descent Type 2, limited by a/c ROD=1500fpm and/or cabin ROD=300fpm

• Descent Type 3, limited by a/c ROD=1000fpm and/or cabin ROD=300fpm

• Descent Type 4, limited by a/c ROD=2000fpm and/or cabin ROD=500fpm

• Descent Type 5, limited by a/c ROD=1500fpm and/or cabin ROD=400fpm

The aircraft ROD and cabin ROD limitations are shown on the illustration below.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 2 3

Page 24: Q400 Manual

4.8!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING The actual descent speeds are shown below in Indicated Air Speed.

The most fuel e!cient descent segment is achieved with a Type 5 descent, followed sequentially to Type 1.

Descent Types 4 and 5 provide an overall higher ROD and significant fuel savings, compared with Types 1 and 2 respectively (up to 40% when descending from FL250). However, these savings are reduced by a longer cruise portion as a result of the shorter descent segment. This is very similar to the “climb - cruise trade o" discussed earlier.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 2 4

In summary, various descent techniques can save up to 5% on fuel burn on a 500nm sector flight.

Page 25: Q400 Manual

4.9!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING 4.9"Optimum Cruise Altitude

From a fuel e!ciency perspective, the most important aspect is the block fuel optimization, not the individual flight segments optimization. For a fixed sector length, optimizing the individual flight segments does not translate into overall flight profile optimization. Similarly, when flying jet-like speeds and profiles, the most important aspect is the block time.

For a given sector length, temperature and wind condition, the most impor-tant factor that impacts the block fuel and block time is the cruise altitude, as that defines TOC position, the cruise segment length and TOD point.

To determine the optimum cruise altitude for each technique, the block fuel/block time charts are plotted for all sector lengths, altitudes, temper-atures and winds, and the optimum altitudes for each technique (minimum block time, minimum block fuel) are selected for each combination of sector length, wind and temperature.

The AOM optimum cruise altitudes for a minimum time technique are based on HSC. The minimum fuel techniques are based on LRC. The related per-formance is presented in Q400 AOM Section 5.2.

As mentioned before, the only way to accurately perform these calculations and to integrate the optimum cruise altitudes is by using specialized route analysis software.

To illustrate this concept (block fuel versus block time), data for di"erent techniques related to the same cruise speed regimes as presented in the Cruise section (4.7) are shown below. The chart, for demonstration purposes only, shows a sector length of 600 nm and three possible cruise altitudes (FL180, FL220, and FL250)9.

• “High speed, short time” technique• ISC or HSC• CL1 / DC1

• “Fuel saving” technique• MRC or LRC• CL2 / DC2

9 Both chart assumptions consist of: ISA, 0 wind, IFR Reserves, 100 nm diversion, High TOW

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 2 5

Page 26: Q400 Manual

4.9!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING •

From the chart above:For a 600 nm sector at FL180, it is possible to complete the “high speed” flight as follows:

Time FuelClimb 1, ISC and Descent 1 133.7 minutes 2163 kg (4768 lb)Climb 1, HSC and Descent 1 124.7 minutes 2358 kg (5198 lb)

However, for the same distance and altitude, the “fuel saving” flight results are:

Time FuelClimb 2, MRC and Descent 2 157.3 minutes 2017 kg (4447 lb)Climb 2, LRC and Descent 2 150.0 minutes 2035 kg (4487 lb)

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 2 6

Page 27: Q400 Manual

4.9!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING Cruise at FL270:

The Q400 maximum operational cruise altitude was recently increased from FL250 to FL270. The following chart shows the fuel savings that can be achieved when flying long sector distances at FL270.

For a typical 500 nm sector, fuel savings will equate to approximately 3%.

4.10"Fuel Reserves and Contingency FuelFuel reserves consist of holding fuel, diversion (alternate) fuel, contingency fuel and extra fuel. On many occasions reserve fuel estimates are conservative; in some cases the pilots will take extra fuel due to lack of confidence in the flight planning data, although most of the time the flight planning providers apply their own safety factors to cover various operational unknowns. The overall result is that too much reserve fuel is carried.

Holding fuel should be estimated based on Maximum Endurance speed (ME) since this speed provides the minimum fuel flow. The holding fuel estimate should also be based on the expected weight at arrival, as the fuel burn for holding is less at lower aircraft operating weights. The expected holding altitude may not necessarily be at the standard 1500 ft ASL. If appli-cable, calculating the fuel burn at a higher assumed holding altitude will allow for less fuel to be carried. Holding data (including holding in icing with minimum speed required in icing) are provided in Q400 AOM Chapter 5.10.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 2 7

Page 28: Q400 Manual

4.1

0!F

LIG

HT

PLA

NN

ING Diversion fuel10 can be minimized in a similar manner to the sector fuel. This

would include using a minimum fuel technique, and optimum cruise altitude selection for the distance and ambient conditions. Depending on the juris-diction, choosing appropriate alternates (enroute alternates) allows a reduc-tion of the contingency factor.

Contingency factors are designed to account for meteorological variations and unforeseen operational constraints. One method to reduce the contin-gency factor is to take into account seasonal variations and statistical data obtained from performance monitoring for specific routes and flight profiles. Another method is to consider decision / diversion points along the route. Overall, contingency factors can be reduced from very conservative 5% or 6% to more accurate and realistic 2% to 3%.

Extra (discretionary) fuel should not be added without a good reason, as it might duplicate reserve fuel components already accounted for in the flight planning, and unnecessarily increase to overall aircraft weight11.

An accurate fuel reserve estimate should be tailored to route specific oper-ational and weather conditions, and be very close to the minimum required by regulations.

4.11"Flight Planning ExampleThe flight planning example below illustrates the impact of using the fuel saving methods described in this manual. A typical high speed operation12 can be optimized for minimum fuel13 with the following procedures:

Fuel Saving Action

Typical High Speed

OperationOptimized for Minimum Fuel

Savings kg/(lb)

Savings % of Block

Fuel

OWE reduction 17819 kg (39284 lb)

17690 kg (39000 lb) - -

Payload estimate 8489 kg (18715 lb)

8339 kg (18385 lb) - -

TOW 29574 kg (65200 lb)

28476 kg (62780 lb) - -

10 Using the flight planning standard of 100 nm or actual diversion/alternates11 Operators employing a Flight E"ciency program highlight this topic as one of the most di"cult to

convince Flight Crew to adhere to, but result in large savings. Flight Crew awareness and compli-ance is critical.

12 Sector length – 500nm, ISA, IFR Reserve – 45 min13 “Typical High Speed Operation” and “Optinized for Minimum Fuel” calculations are performed with

the same route analysis program and database.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 2 8

Page 29: Q400 Manual

4.1

1!FL

IGH

T P

LAN

NIN

G

Fuel Saving Action

Typical High Speed

OperationOptimized for Minimum Fuel

Savings kg/(lb)

Savings % of Block

Fuel

APU Bleeds (ON/OFF)

34 kg (76 lb)

18 kg (39 lb)

16.8 kg (37 lb)

0.7%

Taxi-out (SE/AE Taxi)

93 kg (204 lb)

54 kg (120 lb)

38 kg (84 lb)

1.6%

Take-O" 42 kg (93 lb)

42 kg (93 lb) - -

Air Manoeuvre 28 kg (62 lb)

- 28 kg (62 lb)

1.2%

Climb Type/RPM 324 kg (715 lb)

375 kg (827 lb)

50 kg ( – 112

lb)

-2.2%

Cruise altitude 23000 ft 27000 ft - -Cruise Speed/Winds/CG

1335 kg (2944 lb)

897 kg (1977 lb)

439 kg (967 lb)

18.8 %

Descent Type/ROD

318 kg (703 lb)

166 kg (365 lb)

153 kg (338 lb)

6.6 %

App./Landing/RNP

89 kg (196 lb)

22 kg (49 lb)

67 kg (147 lb)

2.9%

Taxi-in (SE/AE Taxi)

93 kg (204 lb)

54 kg (120 lb)

38 kg (84 lb)

1.6%

Reserve altitude 5000 ft 10000 ft - -

Reserve fuel 817 kg (1802 lb)

532 kg (1172 lb)

286 kg (630 lb) -

Diversion fuel 413 kg (912 lb)

362 kg (799 lb)

47 kg (103 lb) -

Contingency factor

6.00% 2.00% - -

Total Reserves 1359 kg (2997 lb)

924 kg (2038 lb) - -

Block Fuel 2329 kg (5135 lb)

1628 kg (3590 lb)

700 kg (1545 lb)

30.1%

Trip Fuel 2138 kg (4713 lb)

1502 kg (3311 lb)

636 kg (1402lb)

29.7%

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 2 9

Page 30: Q400 Manual

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 3 0

HIGHER RESOLUTION OF SAR DATA USING

COST INDEX TABLES

Page 31: Q400 Manual

5.0!C

OST

IND

EX The Flight Planning section presented fuel e!cient methods for ground

operation, and each individual phase of flight. These methods can be used either separately, or for trip optimization, within a simple (static) or a dynamic Cost Index solution.

Total Cost = Fixed Costs + Time Dependent Costs + Fuel Cost

Cost Index is a concept or a tool used to minimize the total operational cost, not necessarily isolated to minimize fuel burn. Cost Index is defined as the ratio of time-related costs to fuel-related costs, and is specific to each oper-ating environment and each operator, since every operator has di"erent routes, marketing strategies and cost structures.

Cost Index can be measured in:Cost ($)/minute : Cost ($)/kg fuel = kg fuel/minute

For example, the ratio of “100 kg fuel : 1 minute” shows that from a cost perspective 100 kg of fuel can be traded for 1 minute of flight, or vice versa, while maintaining the same operational cost.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 3 1

Page 32: Q400 Manual

5.0!C

OST

IND

EX The fuel related cost is really just the price of fuel on board; however the

time dependent cost is influenced by many factors. The most important time dependent costs are related to:

• flight crew salary and benefits• maintenance and overhaul intervals• missed connecting flights• late flight charges and expenses

Each of these costs can be further analyzed and quantified. For example, the cost of an arrival delay (missing connecting flights):

• can rise sharply in discrete steps and raise sharply to high amounts as more and more people lose connections

• can be quantified and it can help to determine the recovery plan, and be modeled in a (dynamic) Cost Index, when fuel savings are negated by arrival delay costs

A modern, e!cient and safe flight planning requires consideration of many operational aspects (weather, navigational data, airspace rules and restric-tions) and advanced flight management (optimum vertical and horizontal flight profile, at optimum speed), as the optimum altitude and speed change with time, weight and weather. All the operational aspects can be correlated with costs by using a dynamic Cost Index method.

IATA14 identified that the main impediment for fuel e!cient operations is the lack of sophisticated Flight Planning tools (i.e. Cost Index methods). Using Cost Index methods has the biggest savings potential once it is developed, understood and correctly implemented at each level/depart-ment in the organization (management/accounting, maintenance, flight planning, dispatch, flight crew) and continuously monitored and adjusted.

With various Cost Index methods and other fuel saving initiatives, there is always a risk of confusion with regards to “who” is saving either fuel or money, at what level and how, which can lead to conflicting strategies and overall ine!ciencies.

Flight crews need to be aware that a properly implemented Cost Index takes into account not only operational, but more importantly business deci-sions, and that they do not always have visibility to all the factors considered when required to fly a specific Cost Index.

14 Guidance Material and Best Practices for Fuel Management, 1st Edition 2004

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 3 2

Page 33: Q400 Manual

5.0!C

OST

IND

EX If a Cost Index solution is developed, or the flight profile is already

optimized either for minimum time, optimum cost or minimum fuel, it is det-rimental if the flight crew deviates from the plan. However, the flight crew need to be aware of the plan, and be able to make good and safe decisions when operational restrictions or weather changes require deviations.

Ideally, the crew should have the Cost Index tools (FMS, EFB, in-flight sup-port from ground stations, etc.) and the capability to re-optimize when flight milestones or enroute changes occur.

A sophisticated, dynamic Cost Index solution is a software solution that can access and use performance, financial, weather and operational data in real time.

Bombardier has made available a detailed Cost Index performance data package to support flight planning/cost index solutions.

The Q400 Cost Index Data package consists of detailed high resolution climb, cruise and descent performance digital data (AEO and OEI) in small increments of weight, altitude, temperature and speed, in a generic, easy to use and implement format.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 3 3

Page 34: Q400 Manual

5.0!C

OST

IND

EX For example, with reference to the SAR chart below, the Cost Index Data

is provided in additional speed increments of 7 kt, additional weight incre-ments of 227 kg (500 lb), temperature increments of 2 degrees C, and altitude increments of 500 ft. This Cost Index data set has vastly more infor-mation as opposed to the AOM, which for practical reasons, shows only the six cruise regimes described earlier in this document

Therefore, the Q400 Cost Index Data allows for a higher accuracy in all opti-mization calculations, eliminating linear interpolation and other related errors, which will result in a more accurate cruise fuel burn estimate by 2% to 10%.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 3 4

Page 35: Q400 Manual

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 3 5

FLIGHT MANAGEMENT

Page 36: Q400 Manual

6.1!

FLIG

HT

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT 6.1"Enroute Winds

The e"ect of predicted enroute winds (tailwinds or headwinds) are consid-ered in the dispatch flight planning and eventually can be reconsidered in flight, when advantageous. Cruise altitudes can be changed, either to take advantage of tailwinds or to alleviate the e"ect of headwinds.

For example, the chart below shows the influence of headwinds on SAR, for a LRC cruise segment at di"erent altitudes. The chart illustrates how it is possible to estimate if a cruise altitude change would be beneficial.

In this specific example, in order to maintain the original SAR of 0.1300 nm/lb fuel planned for FL210, zero wind, an unpredicted headwind of 25 kt would be alleviated by climbing to FL230 .

Or, reading left to right in the chart, the same SAR of 0.1300 nm/lb can be achieved if climbing to FL250 with a 50 kt headwind.

The e"ect of en-route winds is best accounted for within a flight planning or a Cost Index software program, since the winds are dynamic and frequently changing.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 3 6

Page 37: Q400 Manual

6.2!

FLIG

HT

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT 6.2"Performance Monitoring

Aircraft and engine performance monitoring (airspeed, torque, RPM, fuel flow, fuel quantity on board, correlated with the aircraft weight and the actual ambient conditions) is highly recommended, as it allows to identify trends in engine fuel flow, airframe drag and overall trends at aircraft level.

Performance monitoring also allows the statistical assessment of the flight planning accuracy and the potential reduction or customization of fuel contingency factors. Performance monitoring is often a regulatory audit requirement for IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA).

It is very useful to have a record of fuel on board at critical points: Take-O", TOC, TOD, and fuel remaining at destination. This data will help identify spe-cific areas of flight planning or Cost Index methods that need to be further addressed or refined. This data should be recorded from the actual fuel indi-cations, and not be taken from the FMS.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 3 7

Page 38: Q400 Manual

6.3!

FLIG

HT

MA

NA

GE

ME

NT 6.3"Approach and Landing

Whenever possible and safe, shorten the approach procedure. When prac-tical and permitted, the flight crew can choose to fly a visual approach in order to save both time and fuel. Properly programming the FMS and aligning the descent with the approach will also help reducing the fuel burn.

The advantages of new technology, including RNP, can o"er significant savings by shortening approaches and reducing track miles, which equate to fuel savings. Operators have reported saving anywhere between 5 – 40 track miles with the advent of SID’s or STAR’s. The savings can amount to over 3% of block fuel.15

A decelerated approach (low noise, low drag) can lower fuel consumption and reduce noise. Keeping the aircraft clean, delaying flap and gear selec-tions will help increase the fuel savings.

Consideration should be given to the flap setting used on landing. Maximum flap will have increased drag, and may not be optimum on approaches or runways that do not require their use. Reduced flap landings, where applica-ble, can o"er savings.

6.4"TankeringFor each type of operation, especially for return routes, a specific tanker/transport coe!cient should be derived. Using route analysis or flight plan-ning software, it will be easy to determine the ratio of fuel price at the origin airport compared to the fuel price at the destination airport, and whether it is economical to transport (tanker) fuel. This data can be further refined to determine the optimal tankered fuel quantity.

When tankering, always remember to consider the impact on TOW, payload and landing weight limitations. The cost of tankering can be deter-mined using the chart presented in 4.1.

15 34 nm savings on approach due to RNP capabilities can equate to roughly 180 lb of descent/approach fuel. Assuming a block fuel of 2610 lb, this equates to 6.9% total savings.

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 3 8

Page 39: Q400 Manual

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 3 9

MAINTENANCE

Page 40: Q400 Manual

7.1!

MA

INTE

NA

NC

E 7.1"Airframe MaintenanceAs airframe deterioration is expected over the aircraft operational life16, it is important to e!ciently maintain the aircraft operational e!ciency by per-forming regular airframe inspections and performing repairs or adjustments when required.

The following represent items with the highest potential to have a negative impact on aerodynamic performance and therefore on fuel e!ciency:

• rough surfaces• paint condition• dents, blisters, gaps• surface mismatches• door seals, panel seals and wheel well doors• fairings, engine nacelle• flight controls rigging• dirt, oil leaks, other contamination• airframe asymmetry (following ground or other impacts)

Bombardier has created an Aircraft Economics Working Group to further reduce the per hour operating cost of the aircraft. To date, the hourly oper-ating cost has been reduced by over $75 with various maintenance related initiatives.17

7.2"Engine MaintenanceMonitoring engine performance allows for the determination of fuel con-sumption degradation. This will help in determining the savings expected from maintenance performance improvements versus the cost to perform these activities or refurbishments. All these aspects should be reviewed in detail with the engine manufacturer.

The best plan for maintenance of good engine performance is to maintain the engine gas path as close to original condition as possible, in terms of parts surface condition and compressor and turbine running clearances. This involves cleaning, repairing and replacing components as required, and accepting certain conditions in accordance with AMM and Engine Manuals and CIR. Defining the extent of a work scope is a decision between cost and engine turn time versus expected gains in performance.

16 Airframe components include but are not limited to doors, panels, flight control surfaces, fairings, seals, engine nacelle, etc.

17 AEWG improvements since 2005 can be found on www.iflybombardier.com

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 4 0

Page 41: Q400 Manual

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 4 17.

2!M

AIN

TEN

AN

CE The following elements have a negative impact on fuel burn:

• FOD• dirty compressor• shroud rubbing• HP and LP turbine blade increased tip to shroud clearances.

General recommendations are:

• The LPC1 rotor should be examined for leading edge foreign object damage and erosion. In situ repairs may be carried out in accordance with approved manuals

• Perform a performance recovery wash on a routine schedule• Engine shop visit for HSI or overhaul will re-establish the proper

clearances and parts condition to improve on engine performance hence lower fuel burn.

Performance recovery wash is a detergent wash which has significant per-formance recovery potential, hence direct fuel savings. Detergent washing is recommended to be performed on a routine schedule; the interval is to be optimized based on visual inspection of the compressor rotors. An engine wash can recover 0.5% in terms of fuel e!ciency.

Page 42: Q400 Manual

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 4 2

7.3"Dispatch under MEL and CDLThe Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL) allows for higher dispatch reliability. However, some of the MMEL items have significant impacts and impose additional restrictions on flight planning (either altitude, temperature, speed or weather limitations). These limitations bring fuel consumption pen-alties by not allowing optimum flight planning, for example by not flying at the optimum altitude, or by having to fly above/below/around icing condi-tions. In the context of maximizing fuel e!ciency, these MMEL items should be fixed or replaced as soon as possible:

Component Condition Limitation21-30-1 CABIN PRESS Warning Light

Inoperative Max altitude: 10000 ft

21-30-2 CABIN ALT Indicator Inoperative Max altitude: 10000 ft21-30-3 CABIN DIFF Press. Indicator

Inoperative Max altitude: 10000 ft

21-30-4 CABIN RATE Indicator Inoperative Max altitude: 10000 ft21-30-5 Cabin Pressure Control System

AUTO & MAN modes Inoperative

Max altitude: 10000 ft

21-30-6 Aft Valves Indicator Inoperative Max altitude: 10000 ft27-30-2 Stick Shaker Inoperative No flight in icing27-30-3 Flap Discrepancy Inoperative No flight in icing27-30-4 Stall Warning Inoperative No flight in icing27-30-5 Stick Pusher Inoperative No flight in icing28-40-2 Fuel Tank Temperature Indication, if using Jet B/ JP-4 fuel

Inoperative Max altitude: 20000 ft

30-10-1 TAIL De-Ice Boots Advisory Lights

Inoperative No flight in icing

30-10-2 DEICE PRESS Caution Light

Inoperative No flight in icing

30-10-3 DEICE PRESS Indicators

Inoperative No flight in icing

30-10-4 Low Pressure Warning Switches

Inoperative No flight in icing

7.3!

MA

INTE

NA

NC

E

Page 43: Q400 Manual

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 4 3

Component Condition Limitation30-10-6 Timer Monitor Unit Inoperative No flight in icing30-10-7 Airframe De-Icing Inoperative No flight in icing30-20-2 ENGINE INTAKE HTR Advisory Lights

One Inoperative

No flight in icing

30-20-4 Engine Intake Adapter Heater Assemblies

One Inoperative

No flight in icing

30-30-1 Pitot/Static Heaters Two Inoperative

No flight in icing

30-30-2 Pitot HEAT 1, 2, STBY Caution Lights

Inoperative No flight in icing

30-40-2 Windshield Heaters One Inoperative

No flight in icing

30-60-1 Propeller De-Icing Inoperative No flight in icing30-80-2 Ice Detector Probes Inoperative No flight in icing32-30-1 Landing Gear Inoperative Max speed: 215 KIAS

Retraction System AFM Supp. 94

Max altitude: 20000 ft35-20-1 Passenger Oxygen System (APPOS)

Inoperative Max altitude: 13000 ft

36-10-1 Bleed Systems One Inoperative

Max altitude: 10000 ft

52-10-2 Door Seal Drain Valve Open

Inoperative Max altitude: 10000 ft

71-60-1 Engine Intake Bypass Doors

DoorsInoperative

No flight in icing

71-60-1 Engine Intake Bypass Doors

Inoperative Open

Max Temp. = ISA+25

7.3!

MA

INTE

NA

NC

E

Page 44: Q400 Manual

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 4 4

Similarly, the Q400 AFM Supplement 41 Configuration Deviation List (CDL) allows the airplane to be operated with certain missing parts that cause a performance degradation or limitation. In the context of optimum flight planning and fuel e!ciency, the following should be replaced as soon as possible:

Component Condition Limitation30-1 Wing Root Cold Bonded Leading Edge De-ice Boot

One Inoperative

No flight in icing

30-2 Engine Intake De-ice Boot One Inoperative

No flight in icing

32-1 MLG Shock Strut Performance limited

Fairings All Inoperative

weight reduced by 450 kg

32-1 NLG Aft Doors One Inoperative

Maximum Speed = 190 KIAS7.

3!M

AIN

TEN

AN

CE

Page 45: Q400 Manual

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 4 5

CONCLUSION

Page 46: Q400 Manual

Q400 Fuel E!ciency Manual 4 68.

0!C

ON

CLU

SIO

N F!uel e!ciency is very important and there are many ways of improv-ing it, as shown in this manual. However, it is always important to remember that fuel e!ciency is just one component of an overall

cost e!cient and safe operation.

Summary of best practices:

• flight plan using accurate data and minimum fuel techniques• fly at speeds and at altitudes appropriate to economic priorities when

using a cost index method• use flight planning based on contingency factors derived from aircraft

performance monitoring• ensure proper maintenance of engine and airframe; avoid significant

MEL/CDL items

The data presented in this manual are for illustration and not subject to regular revisions. They are not intended to replace or amend any data, procedures or recommendations presented in the AFM or AOM. For oper-ational use and flight planning, always refer to Q400 AFM, AOM and Cost Index Data.

Recommended additional reference: IATA Guidance Material and Best Prac-tices for Fuel and Environmental Management – including the E!ciency Checklist.

For any observations, comments or questions, please contact Technical Help Desk at [email protected]

Bombardier would like to recognize the leadership shown by Flybe with their Fuel E!ciency program, and would like to thank Ben Davies, Chris Nagle, and Chris Coney Jones for their individual contributions to this e"ort.