Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ACERAgency for the Cooperation
— of Energy Regulators
Annex IIEvaluation of responses to the
consultation on the Congestion income distribution methodologywith all regulatory authorities and T$Os
1 Introduction
Pursuant to Article 9(6)(m) and 73(1) of the CACM Regulation, all TSOs submitted the proposal forCongestion income distribution methodology (CJDM) to their respective regulatory authorities forapproval. The proposal was received by the last of the concerned regulatory authorities on 1 8 August2016. On 17 February 2017, all regulatory authorities summited to all TSOs a request for amendmentto the proposal. Subsequently, all TSOs submitted to all regulatory authorities the amended proposal(“Proposal”), which was received by the last of the concerned regulatory authorities on 27 April 2017.On 14 June 2017, all regulatory authorities informed the Agency that they have agreed to request theAgency to adopt a decision on the Proposal, pursuant to Article 9(12) of the CACM Regulation, andindicated that the regulatory authorities were able to agree on the key elements of the Proposal to beaddressed by the Agency’ s decision.From July to September 2017, the Agency organised several web-conferences with all TSOs to discussthe issues raised by all regulatory authorities and subsequently by the Agency. This period of informalconsultation continued with the formal consultation involving all TSOs and regulatory authorities lastingfrom 6 October until 20 October 2017. In the consultation document, the Agency proposed amendmentsto the Proposal.This annex contains the summary and the evaluation ofthe responses received from TSOs and regulatoryauthorities.
2 Responses
The Agency received the following nine responses to the consultation:1. AEEGSI2. CRE
3. CREG4. E-CONTROL5. El6. ENTSO-E on behalf of all TSOs7. ILR8. SEPS9. URE
The table below is organised according to the proposed amendments in the consultation and providesthe respective views from the respondents, as well as the response from the Agency how their commentswere taken into account.
Agency for the Cooperation of Energy RegulatorsTrg Republike 3
Ljubljana - Slovenia
AC
ER
Age
ncy
for
the
Coo
pera
tion
ofIn
crgy
Reg
utat
ors
Res
pond
ent’
svi
ews
AC
ER
view
s
Gen
eral
.1 .
Dis
agre
e.In
the
Age
ncy’
svi
ew,
the
CID
Msh
ould
appl
yto
1 .E
lco
nsid
ers
that
the
scop
eof
CII
JMsh
ould
beon
lyto
bord
erbe
twee
nE
U.
..
.
..
..
.al
lbi
ddin
gzo
nebo
rder
sde
fine
din
the
defi
niti
onof
CC
Rs.
Mem
ber
Stat
esin
orde
rto
beco
mpl
iant
wit
hth
ede
fmit
ion
of“I
nter
conn
ecto
r”.
..
..
.A
diff
eren
tap
proa
chw
ould
lead
toin
cons
iste
ncie
s.an
d“C
onge
stio
n”es
tabl
ishe
dby
Reg
ulat
ion
EC
714/
2009
.
2.IL
Rco
nsid
ers
that
CU
JMsh
ould
also
incl
ude
the
rule
sfo
rSI
DC
.If
the
CD
Mis
2.P
artl
yag
ree.
The
Age
ncy
clar
ifie
din
the
deci
sion
that
itke
ptas
prop
osed
, the
nIL
Rpr
opos
edto
clar
ify
that
,on
ceth
ecl
arit
yab
outt
hedo
esno
tfi
ndit
reas
onab
leto
defi
neth
eru
les
for
dist
ribu
tion
cong
esti
onin
com
ege
nera
ted
inSI
DC
isob
tain
ed,
TS
Os
shou
ldm
ake
apr
opos
alof
cong
esti
onin
com
efr
omSI
DC
sinc
ecu
rren
tly
nofo
ram
endm
ents
ofC
IDM
inac
cord
ance
wit
hA
rtic
le9(
13)
ofC
AC
Mco
nges
tion
inco
me
isge
nera
ted
byS
DC
and
itis
not
yet
Reg
ulat
ion.
know
nho
wit
wil
lbe
gene
rate
d.N
ever
thel
ess,
the.
Age
ncy
clar
ifie
din
the
reci
tals
ofth
eC
DM
that
once
suff
icie
ntcl
arit
yis
obta
ined
,th
eC
TDM
shou
ldbe
amen
ded
toin
clud
eal
sopr
ovis
ions
for
dist
ribu
tion
ofco
nges
tion
inco
me
from
SID
C.
3.IL
Rpr
opos
eto
exte
ndth
esc
ope
ofC
DJM
toal
lT
SO
san
dno
t jus
tto
cert
ifie
d3.
Agr
ee.
The
Age
ncy
has
rem
oved
the
refe
renc
eto
cert
ifie
dT
SOs.
CR
EO
Ssh
ould
cons
ider
edby
this
met
hodo
logy
,bu
tit
isno
ta
cert
ifie
dT
SOs.
TS
Oas
Art
icle
9of D
irec
tive
EC
/72/
2009
does
not
appl
yto
Lux
embu
rg.
Exte
rnal
flow
sin
FB
CC
Rs
1.E
NT
SO
-Epr
opos
eto
amen
dth
ede
fini
tion
ofex
tern
alfl
owto
refl
ect
the
mai
nP
artl
yag
ree.
The
Age
ncy
agre
esw
ith
the
amen
dmen
tof
purp
ose
toba
lanc
eth
ere
gion
alne
tpo
siti
onof
the
bidd
ing
zone
sin
case
thes
eth
ede
fini
tion
of
exte
rnal
flow
.T
heA
genc
yco
nsid
ers
that
net
posi
tion
sar
eno
teq
ual
toth
esu
mof
AA
Fs.
EN
TS
O-E
also
prop
oses
toad
dth
epr
opos
alfo
ra
defi
niti
onof
exte
rnal
flow
valu
eis
not
ade
fini
tion
onth
eex
tern
alfl
owva
lue.
need
edsi
nce
the
exte
rnal
flow
shou
ldno
tbe
cons
ider
edas
som
ethi
ngde
viat
ing
from
the
gene
ral
prin
cipl
esof
cong
esti
onin
com
edi
stri
buti
on.
Inst
ead,
the
exte
rnal
flow
shou
ldbe
cons
ider
edco
mm
erci
alfl
owfo
rw
hich
the
2/8
AC
ER
Ag
ency
for
the
Cooper
atio
nof
tnerg
yR
egula
tors
Res
pond
ent’
svi
ews
AC
ER
view
s
gene
ral
rule
s(i
.e.
com
mer
cial
flow
mul
tipl
ied
wit
hth
em
arke
tsp
read
)st
illap
ply.
2.E
NT
SO
-Ean
dA
EE
GS
Ipr
opos
eto
clar
ify
that
inFB
CC
Rs
the
net
posi
tion
s2.
Agr
ee.
The
Age
ncy
agre
esan
din
trod
uces
the
term
used
for
calc
ulat
ion
ofA
AF
san
dex
tern
alfl
ows
are
not
glob
alne
tpos
itio
nsbu
t“r
egio
nal
net
posi
tion
”to
indi
cate
the
net p
osit
ion
resu
ltin
g
inst
ead
the
net
posi
tion
sre
sult
ing
from
exch
ange
sw
ithi
na
CC
R.
from
exch
ange
sw
ithi
na
CC
R.
3.E
NT
$O-E
prop
ose
toin
trod
uce
afl
exib
ilit
yby
whi
chth
ebi
ddin
gzo
nebo
rder
s3
Dis
agie
e.T
hepr
opos
alis
not
acce
ptab
lebe
caus
e:
havi
ngex
tern
alfl
ows
may
deci
deto
shar
epa
rtoft
he
cong
esti
onin
com
eit
does
not
spec
ify
such
devi
atio
ns(i
.e.
whi
chbi
ddin
g
gene
rate
dby
exte
rnal
flow
sw
ith
othe
rbi
ddin
gzo
nes
inth
eC
CR
.T
hese
bidd
ing
zone
sw
illde
viat
efr
omth
ege
nera
lru
le);
zone
sw
ould
defi
neth
epe
rcen
tage
that
issh
ared
wit
hot
her
bidd
ing
zone
sin
the
itdo
esno
tpr
ovid
ead
equa
teju
stif
icat
ion
for
such
CC
Ran
dw
ith
whi
chbi
ddin
gzo
nes
the
valu
eis
tobe
shar
ed.
devi
atio
ns.
The
fact
that
such
devi
atio
nw
ould
mim
ic
exis
ting
agre
emen
tca
nnot
beco
nsid
ered
asa
suff
icie
ntju
stif
icat
ion.
Just
ific
atio
nw
ould
need
tobe
base
don
mor
esu
bsta
ntia
lgr
ound
s.-
itim
pose
sth
eob
liga
tion
son
bidd
ing
zone
sra
ther
than
onen
titie
s(i
.e.
TSO
s)
4.C
RE
aske
dfo
rco
ncre
teex
ampl
efo
rca
lcul
atio
nof
exte
rnal
flow
sin
orde
rto
be4
Par
tly
agre
e.T
heA
genc
yw
ould
also
wel
com
eco
ncre
te
able
tobe
tter
com
preh
end
the
prop
osal
atha
nd.
exam
ples
from
TSO
s,ho
wev
er,
itco
nsid
ers
that
such
exam
ples
are
not
apr
ereq
uisi
tefo
rm
akin
ga
deci
sion
onth
isis
sue.
5.C
RE
Gra
ised
obje
ctio
nsto
the
prop
osal
that
cong
esti
onin
com
ege
nera
ted
byD
isag
ree.
The
Age
ncy
has
eval
uate
dth
ese
com
men
tsan
d
exte
rnal
flow
sar
eto
beal
loca
ted
toth
eT
SO
sof
bidd
ing
zone
sha
ving
exte
rnal
conc
lude
dth
atth
eyar
eno
tsu
ffic
ient
lyst
rong
toju
stif
y
flow
s.T
heir
reas
ons
for
obje
ctio
nsw
ere
the
follo
win
g:de
fmin
gth
eC
WE
rule
asa
defa
ult
rule
oras
ade
viat
ion
from
the
gene
ral
rule
.In
part
icul
ar:
3/8
AC
ER
Age
ncy
for
the
Coo
pera
tion
oFE
nerg
yR
egul
ator
a
(a)
exis
ting
CW
EC
II)
rule
sag
reed
byal
lU
WE
part
ies
spec
ify
that
50%
ofex
tern
alfl
ows
are
dist
ribu
ted
pro
port
ional
lyam
ong
all
bid
din
gzo
nebo
rder
sof
the
CW
Ere
gion
;
(b)
The
CW
EC
Dru
les
are
mor
efa
ir,
sinc
eth
eco
nges
tion
inco
me
isge
nera
ted
byex
tern
alfl
ows,
whi
chto
ace
rtai
nex
tent
use
the
inte
rcon
nect
ors
onot
her,
inte
rnal
bidd
ing
zone
bord
ers
asw
ell.
Exc
hang
esbe
twee
nF
Ran
dD
Epa
rtly
flow
thro
ugh
CH
,bu
tal
soth
roug
hB
Ean
dN
L;
(C)
Pro
pose
d50
/50
shar
ing
key
for
cong
esti
onin
com
ege
nera
ted
byex
tern
alfl
ows
resu
lts,
for
thos
eT
SOs
onth
eex
tern
albo
rder
s,in
the
sam
eco
nges
tion
inco
me
asw
ould
beth
eca
seif
CH
wou
ldbe
part
ofth
eC
CR
.A
sth
eC
Hpa
rtof
cong
esti
onin
com
eca
nnot
beat
trib
uted
toC
Hit
isfa
irto
shar
eit
amon
gal
lT
SOs;
and
(U)
The
rule
prop
osed
byA
CE
Rw
ould
redu
ceth
eco
nges
tion
inco
me
for
Bel
gian
TS
Oin
over
all
for
17.9
%in
2016
.
a)E
xist
ing
sub-
regi
onal
arra
ngem
ents
are
not
nece
ssar
ya
soli
dju
stif
icat
ion
for
the
appl
icat
ion
ofan
EU
-wid
em
etho
dolo
gy.
CW
EFB
need
sto
bere
plac
edw
ith
new
arra
ngem
ents
com
plia
ntw
ith
the
CA
CM
Reg
ulat
ion.
b)In
the
Age
ncy’
sun
ders
tand
ing,
exte
rnal
flow
sdo
not
use
BE
and
NL
inte
rcon
nect
ors.
InFB
appr
oach
,th
em
arke
tco
upli
ngal
gori
thm
calc
ulat
esne
tpo
siti
ons
of b
iddi
ngzo
nes,
but
not
exch
ange
sbe
twee
nbi
ddin
gzo
nes
oron
bidd
ing
zone
bord
ers.
The
sear
eid
enti
fied
only
whe
nco
nver
ting
the
net
posi
tion
sin
toco
mm
erci
alfl
ows
onth
ebo
rder
s(i
.e.
AA
Fs
and
exte
rnal
flow
s).
Thi
sm
eans
that
AA
Fon
BE
and
NL
bord
ers
alre
ady
acco
unts
for
the
flow
sfr
omal
lex
chan
ges
betw
een
all
bidd
ing
zone
sin
aC
CR
(inc
ludi
ngth
etr
ade
betw
een
DE
and
FR
bidd
ing
zone
s).
c)U
nder
the
assu
mpt
ion
that
CH
wou
ldbe
part
ofSD
AC
,th
efl
ows
onF
R-C
Han
dD
E-C
Hbo
rder
sw
ould
beco
nsid
ered
asco
mm
erci
alfl
ows
betw
een
FR
and
CH
and
betw
een
DE
and
FR.
How
ever
,in
case
CH
isno
tpa
rtic
ipat
ing
inSD
AC
,th
ere
are
noco
mm
erci
alfl
ows
betw
een
FR
and
CH
and
betw
een
DE
-and
CH
.In
stea
d,ex
tern
alfl
ows
repr
esen
tco
mm
erci
alfl
ows
betw
een
FR
and
DE
,si
nce
the
unde
rlyi
ngtr
ade
ison
lybe
twee
nC
WE
bidd
ing
zone
s.d)
The
Age
ncy
took
into
acco
unt
this
conc
ern.
Res
pond
ent’
svi
ews
AC
ER
view
s
4/8
AC
ER
—A
genc
yfo
rth
eC
oope
rati
on()
Ene
rgy
Reg
ulat
ors
Res
pond
ent’
svi
ews
AC
ER
view
s
6.IL
Rpr
opos
edso
me
amen
dmen
tsto
bett
ercl
arif
yth
ede
fini
tion
san
dth
e6.
Agi
ee.
The
Age
ncy
took
thos
esu
gges
tion
sin
toac
coun
t.
proc
edur
eto
calc
ulat
eex
tern
alfl
ows.
7.SE
PSpr
ovid
edso
me
clar
ific
atio
nson
the
proc
edur
eto
calc
ulat
eex
tern
alfl
ows.
7P
artl
yag
ree.
The
Age
ncy
cons
ider
sth
eC
AC
Mde
fini
tion
The
yre
late
toth
ecl
arit
yof
calc
ulat
ing
the
PT
DF
(i.e
.P
TD
fsh
ould
spec
ify
of
aP
TD
Fsu
ffic
ient
lycl
ear
toen
able
itsun
ambi
guou
s
whe
ther
itis
calc
ulat
edas
zone
-to-
zone
,zo
ne-t
o-hu
bor
zone
-to-
refe
renc
ezo
ne)
appl
icat
ion
(the
CA
CM
defi
niti
onof
aP
TD
fre
quir
esa
and
the
clar
ity
inca
lcul
atin
gth
epr
ice
ofth
evi
rtua
lhu
b.re
fere
nce
node
orzo
nefo
rth
eca
lcul
atio
nof P
TD
F).
Wit
hre
gard
toth
eca
lcul
atio
noft
hepr
ice
ofvi
rtua
lhu
b,th
eA
genc
ym
ade
amen
dmen
ts,
whi
chcl
arif
yth
atth
epr
ice
of
virt
ual h
ubis
the
pric
eth
atm
inim
ises
the
valu
eof t
hefo
rmul
asp
ecif
ied
inA
rtic
le3(
4)oft
he
CD
M.
Rem
uner
atio
nof
LT
TR
s
1.E
NT
SO
-Epr
opos
edan
addi
tion
alA
rtic
leto
incl
ude
the
shar
ing
ofco
sts
of1.
Dis
agre
e.Sh
arin
goft
heco
sts
ofre
mun
erat
ion
of
LT
TR
sis
rem
uner
atio
nof
LT
TR
s.A
ccor
ding
toE
NT
SO
-E,
this
isne
eded
toen
sure
that
outs
ide
the
scop
eoft
he
CID
Man
dsh
ould
beco
vere
dby
noT
$Ow
illbe
face
dw
ith
nega
tive
cong
esti
onin
com
eon
ceth
eco
sts
ofth
em
etho
dolo
gypu
rsua
ntto
FC
AR
egul
atio
n.re
mun
erat
ion
have
been
paid
.N
ever
thel
ess,
the
Age
ncy
ackn
owle
dges
the
conc
erns
of
T$O
sw
ith
this
resp
ect
and
has
intr
oduc
eda
spec
ific
reci
tal,
whi
chem
phas
ises
the
impo
rtan
ceof
mai
ntai
ning
the
reve
nue
adeq
uacy
of
each
TSO
whe
nre
mun
erat
ing
LT
TR
s.T
hus,
the
TS
Os
that
rece
ive
the
cong
esti
onin
com
efr
omL
TT
Rs
that
have
been
real
loca
ted
atth
eSD
AC
shou
ldal
sobe
ara
prop
orti
onal
part
oft
he
cost
sfo
rre
mun
erat
ion
ofth
ose
LT
TR
s.T
his
prin
cipl
esh
ould
bere
flec
ted
inth
em
etho
dolo
gyfo
rsh
arin
gco
sts
incu
rred
toen
sure
firm
ness
and
rem
uner
atio
nof
long
-te
rm
5/8
AC
ER
WA
gnc>
’fo
rth
e(D
ooper
atio
nof
Ene
rgy
Rgu
1ato
rs
Res
pond
ent’
svi
ews
AC
ER
view
s
tran
smis
sion
righ
tsin
acco
rdan
cew
ith
Art
icle
61(3
)oft
heF
CA
Reg
ulat
ion.
2.E
-Con
trol
find
sit
impo
rtan
tto
pres
erve
aru
lees
tabl
ishi
nga
link
betw
een
the
2.A
gree
.Se
epo
int
1.re
mun
erat
ion
of
LT
TR
san
dC
Ifr
omda
y-ah
ead
mar
ket
coup
ling
eith
erin
the
CD
Mor
inan
othe
rm
etho
dolo
gy.
3.E
i pro
pose
sto
dele
teal
lpr
ovis
ions
onth
ere
mun
erat
ion
ofL
TT
Rs
incl
udin
gth
e3
Pai
tly
disa
gree
.T
heA
genc
yco
nsid
ers
that
thos
eT
SO
sne
ttin
gof
rem
uner
atio
nco
sts
tode
term
ine
the
fina
lco
nges
tion
inco
me
from
whi
chha
veis
sued
LT
TR
sin
aC
CR
ina
coor
dina
ted
way
,
$DA
C.
Ei
isag
ains
tso
cial
isat
ion
ofL
TT
Rre
mun
erat
ion
cost
s.sh
ould
toge
ther
guar
ante
eth
ere
mun
erat
ion
ofL
TT
Rs.
4.C
RE
Gac
know
ledg
edth
atal
lNR
As
have
mad
ea
posi
tion
that
shar
ing
ofth
eA
gree
.T
his
prin
cipl
eis
emph
asis
edin
the
reci
tals
of t
he
cost
sof
LT
TR
sis
not
wit
hin
the
scop
eof
CD
M.
How
ever
,C
RE
Gas
ksth
eC
flJM
.
Age
ncy
tocl
earl
yup
hold
the
prin
cipl
eof
soci
alis
atio
nof
cost
sof
rem
uner
atio
nof
LT
TR
wit
hin
aC
CR
inor
der
toen
sure
that
noT
SO
wou
ldha
vene
gati
veco
nges
tion
inco
me
afie
rit
has
paid
out
the
cost
sfo
rre
mun
erat
ion
ofL
TT
Rs.
5.A
EE
GS
Ico
mm
ente
dth
atpe
rhap
sth
ere
mun
erat
ion
ofL
TT
Rs
shou
ldbe
done
5P
artl
yag
ree.
Whi
lein
prac
tice
this
may
beap
plie
das
befo
reth
esh
arin
gof
the
cong
esti
onin
com
ean
dth
ere
mai
ning
inco
me
shou
ldsu
gges
ted.
Leg
ally
the
cons
truc
tion
ofth
ispr
oces
sis
such
then
besu
bjec
t to
dist
ribu
tion
acco
rdin
gto
CD
JM.
that
T$O
ssh
are
all
oft
he
cong
esti
onin
com
ere
ceiv
edat
day-
ahea
dti
mef
ram
epu
rsua
ntto
the
CID
Man
din
para
llel
shar
eth
eco
sts
ofre
mun
erat
ion
of
LT
TR
spu
rsua
ntto
am
etho
dolo
gyfo
rsh
arin
gco
sts
incu
rred
toen
sure
firm
ness
and
rem
uner
atio
nof
long
-te
rmtr
ansm
issi
onri
ghts
inac
cord
ance
wit
hA
rtic
le61
(3)
of t
heF
CA
Reg
ulat
ion.
Non
-int
uiti
vefl
ows
__,:
:;::
:76/
8
AC
ER
t\g:n
cy
forth
Cooper
atio
n—
oL
ncrg
vR
egula
tors
1.E
-con
trol
and
CR
Esu
ppor
tth
eco
nver
sion
of n
egat
ive
cong
esti
onin
com
edu
eto
non-
intu
itiv
efl
ows
into
apo
siti
veco
nges
tion
inco
me
and
the
subs
eque
ntre
adju
stm
ent
of
cong
esti
onin
com
ein
aC
CR
.
2.A
EE
G$I
does
not
see
any
rati
onal
eto
set
nega
tive
cong
esti
onin
com
eto
posi
tive
sinc
ein
this
case
the
cong
esti
onin
com
eis
not
attr
ibut
edto
the
bord
ers
wit
hco
nges
tion
sbu
tis
inst
ead
seen
asth
edi
stri
buti
onof
wel
fare
aris
ing
from
cros
s-zo
nal
trad
e.
All
ocat
ion
cons
trai
nts
1.A
gree
.T
heA
genc
yha
sev
alua
ted
diff
eren
top
tion
san
dco
nclu
ded
that
nobe
tter
opti
onex
ists
for
trea
ting
the
non-
intu
itiv
efl
ows.
2.P
artl
yag
ree.
Whi
leth
eT
SOpr
opos
alin
deed
lack
spr
oper
just
ific
atio
n,th
eA
genc
yco
uld
not
find
abe
tter
and
mor
eju
stif
ied
prop
osal
.T
$Os
and
NR
As
also
did
not
mak
ean
ypr
opos
als
for
abe
tter
solu
tion.
1.E
NT
SO
-Epr
opos
edto
add
addi
tion
alru
les
for
shar
ing
cong
esti
onin
com
edu
eto
allo
cati
onco
nstr
aint
s.T
hese
rule
sw
ould
addr
ess
the
case
whe
reim
port
orex
port
lim
its
wou
ldca
use
ane
gati
veco
nges
tion
inco
me
onon
ebo
rder
and
ahi
gher
cong
esti
onin
com
eon
the
othe
rbo
rder
.T
his
prob
lem
wou
ldno
tbe
solv
edw
ith
the
gene
ral
rule
sfo
rth
etr
eatm
ent
ofn
on-i
ntui
tive
flow
s(i
.e.
sett
ing
the
nega
tive
inco
me
onth
ebo
rder
toa
posi
tive
one
and
redi
stri
bute
the
mis
sing
inco
me
prop
orti
onal
lybe
twee
nal
lbo
rder
sof
aC
CR
),si
nce
the
prob
lem
may
bepr
esen
ton
lyin
apa
rtof
aC
CR
and
acro
ssdi
ffer
ent
CC
Rs.
1.D
isag
ree.
The
Age
ncy
disa
gree
sw
ith
the
appl
icat
ion
ofal
loca
tion
cons
trai
nts
acro
ssdi
ffer
ent
CC
Rs,
sinc
eth
ene
edfo
rsu
chal
loca
tion
cons
trai
nts
impl
yth
atth
ebo
rder
sin
diff
eren
tC
CR
sar
ein
terd
epen
dent
and
shou
ldfo
rth
isve
ryre
ason
bein
clud
edin
the
sam
eC
CR
.F
urth
erm
ore,
the
solu
tion
prop
osed
byE
NT
SO
-Eis
cons
ider
ing
only
one
type
of
allo
cati
onco
nstr
aint
s(i
.e.
expo
rtor
impo
rtli
mit
s),
whe
reas
othe
rty
pes
ofal
loca
tion
cons
trai
nts
that
may
beap
plie
din
futu
rear
eno
tco
nsid
ered
byth
ispr
opos
al.
Res
pond
ent’
svi
ews
AC
ER
view
s
2.U
RE
supp
orte
dth
epr
opos
alof
EN
TS
O-E
toin
clud
ead
diti
onal
rule
son
2.D
isag
ree.
See
poin
t1.
cong
esti
onin
com
edu
eto
allo
cati
onco
nstr
aint
s.
Dis
trib
utio
nof
cong
esti
onin
com
eon
bidd
ing
zone
bord
er
1.F
-Con
trol
prop
oses
that
the
50-5
0sh
arin
gof
the
cong
esti
onin
com
eon
the
1.A
gree
.T
heA
genc
ym
ade
amen
dmen
tsto
the
Art
icle
5(1)
bidd
ing
zone
bord
ersh
ould
bede
fine
das
ade
faul
tke
ysu
chth
atif
ther
eis
noto
clar
ify
that
the
exem
ptio
nsar
eli
mit
edin
scop
eon
lyto
situ
atio
nsre
flec
ting
spec
ific
inve
stm
ent
cost
sor
the
7/8
AC
ER
—A
genc
yfo
rth
eC
oope
rati
onct
lE
nerg
yR
egula
tors
Res
ponden
t’s
view
sA
CE
Rvi
ews
othe
rsp
ecif
icag
reem
ent,
the
defa
ult
key
isau
tom
atic
ally
appl
ied.
Spec
ific
owne
rshi
psh
are
oft
hein
terc
onne
ctor
san
dth
atal
tern
ativ
ear
rang
emen
tssh
ould
bedu
lyju
stif
ied.
perc
enta
ges
shou
ldm
atch
thes
esi
tuat
ions
exac
tly.
2.C
RE
and
ILR
rais
edco
ncer
nsth
atT
SOs
wou
ldbe
able
tom
ake
anag
reem
ent
to2.
Par
tly
agre
e.A
sin
dica
ted
inpo
int
1,th
eA
genc
ypr
ovid
edde
viat
efr
omth
e50
-50
shar
ing
key
wit
hout
the
invo
lvem
ent
and
appr
oval
ofm
ore
clar
ity
inw
hich
case
sde
viat
ions
are
allo
wed
and
com
pete
ntN
RA
s.C
RE
asks
that
such
devi
atio
nssh
ould
besp
ecif
ied
inth
ean
nex
fixe
dth
epe
rcen
tage
sin
such
case
sdi
rect
lyto
the
alre
ady
toC
DJM
.es
tabl
ishe
dra
tios
ofin
vest
men
tco
sts
orow
ners
hip
shar
e.T
hus
the
used
perc
enta
ges
cann
otde
viat
efr
omth
ese
esta
blis
hed
ratio
s.A
sth
ese
prev
ious
lyes
tabl
ishe
dra
tion
sw
ere
like
lyal
read
yap
prov
edby
NR
As,
thes
ede
viat
ions
,ev
enif
not
spec
ifie
das
anA
nnex
toth
eC
DM
,w
ould
enta
ilth
ere
quir
edle
vel
ofre
gula
tory
scru
tiny.
Tra
nsp
aren
cy
1.E
NT
$O-E
prop
osed
som
eam
endm
ents
toth
etr
ansp
aren
cypr
ovis
ions
prop
osed
1.A
gree
.T
heA
genc
yfi
nds
the
publ
icat
ion
ona
mon
thly
byth
eA
genc
y.E
NT
SO
-Epr
opos
eddi
ffer
ent
requ
irem
ents
for
FBan
dC
NT
Cba
sis
reas
onab
le.
The
Age
ncy
also
took
into
acco
unt
othe
rre
gion
san
da
publ
icat
ion
ona
mon
thly
basi
s.su
gges
tion
sfr
omE
NT
$O-E
.
__
08/
8
