27
# McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Pure Competition 7

Pure Competition

  • Upload
    mrinal

  • View
    61

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Pure Competition. 7. Four Market Models. Pure competition Pure monopoly Monopolistic competition Oligopoly. LO1. Pure Competition: Characteristics. Very large numbers of sellers Standardized product “Price takers” Easy entry and exit Perfectly elastic demand - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Pure Competition

#

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Pure Competition

7

Page 2: Pure Competition

7-2

Four Market Models

• Pure competition• Pure monopoly• Monopolistic competition• Oligopoly

LO1

Page 3: Pure Competition

7-3

Pure Competition: Characteristics• Very large numbers of sellers• Standardized product• “Price takers”• Easy entry and exit• Perfectly elastic demand

•Firm produces as much or little as they want at the price

•Demand graphs as horizontal line

LO2

Page 4: Pure Competition

7-4

Average, Total, and Marginal Revenue

LO3

Firm’sDemandSchedule(AverageRevenue)

Firm’sRevenue

Data

D = MR = AR

TR

P QD TR MR

$131131131131131131131131131131131

0123456789

10

$0131262393524655786917

104811791310

$131131131131131131131131131131

]]]]]]]]]]

Page 5: Pure Competition

7-5

Average, Total, and Marginal Revenue

• Average revenue•Revenue per unit•AR = TR/Q = P

• Total revenue •TR = P × Q

• Marginal revenue •Extra revenue from 1 more unit•MR = ΔTR/ΔQ

LO3

Page 6: Pure Competition

7-6

Profit Maximization: TR-TC Approach

• Three questions:•Should the firm produce?• If so, what amount?•What economic profit (loss) will be

realized?

LO3

Page 7: Pure Competition

7-7

Profit Maximization: MR-MC Approach

LO3

The Profit-Maximizing Output for a Purely Competitive Firm: Marginal Revenue– Marginal Cost Approach (Price = $131)

(1)Total

Product(Output)

(2)Average

Fixed Cost (AFC)

(3)Average Variable

Cost (AVC)

(4)Average

Total Cost(ATC)

(5)Marginal

Cost(MC)

(5)Price =

Marginal Revenue

(MR)

(6)Total Economic

Profit (+)or Loss (-)

0 $-100

1 $100.00 $90.00 $190 $90 $131 -59

2 50.00 85.00 135 80 131 -8

3 33.33 80.00 113.33 70 131 +53

4 25.00 75.00 100.00 60 131 +124

5 20.00 74.00 94.00 70 131 +185

6 16.67 75.00 91.67 80 131 +236

7 14.29 77.14 91.43 90 131 +277

8 12.50 81.25 93.75 110 131 +298

9 11.11 86.67 97.78 130 131 +29910 10.00 93.00 103.00 150 131 +280

Page 8: Pure Competition

7-8

Profit Maximization: MR-MC Approach

LO3

Cos

t and

Rev

enue

$200

150

100

50

01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Output

Economic Profit MR = P

MCMR = MC

AVC

ATC

P=$131

A=$97.78

Page 9: Pure Competition

7-9

Loss-Minimizing Case

• Loss minimization•Still produce because P > min AVC• Losses at a minimum where MR =

MC

LO3

Page 10: Pure Competition

7-10

Profit Minimization: MR-MC Approach

LO3

The Profit-Minimizing Output for a Purely Competitive Firm: Marginal Revenue– Marginal Cost Approach (Price = $81)

(1)Total

Product(Output)

(2)Average

Fixed Cost (AFC)

(3)Average Variable

Cost (AVC)

(4)Average

Total Cost(ATC)

(5)Marginal

Cost(MC)

(5)Price =

Marginal Revenue

(MR)

(6)Total

Economic Profit (+)

or Loss (-)0 $-100

1 $100.00 $90.00 $190 $90 $81 -109

2 50.00 85.00 135 80 81 -108

3 33.33 80.00 113.33 70 81 -97

4 25.00 75.00 100.00 60 81 -76

5 20.00 74.00 94.00 70 81 -65

6 16.67 75.00 91.67 80 81 -64

7 14.29 77.14 91.43 90 81 -73

8 12.50 81.25 93.75 110 81 -102

9 11.11 86.67 97.78 130 81 -151

10 10.00 93.00 103.00 150 81 -220

Page 11: Pure Competition

7-11

Loss-Minimizing Case

LO3

Cos

t and

Rev

enue

$200

150

100

50

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Output

Loss

MR = P

MC

AVC

ATC

P=$81

A=$91.67

V = $75

Page 12: Pure Competition

7-12

Shutdown Case: MR-MC Approach

LO3

The Profit-Minimizing Output for a Purely Competitive Firm: Marginal Revenue– Marginal Cost Approach (Price = $71)

(1)Total

Product(Output)

(2)Average

Fixed Cost (AFC)

(3)Average Variable

Cost (AVC)

(4)Average

Total Cost(ATC)

(5)Marginal

Cost(MC)

(5)Price =

Marginal Revenue

(MR)

(6)Total

Economic Profit (+)

or Loss (-)0 $-100

1 $100.00 $90.00 $190 $90 $71 -119

2 50.00 85.00 135 80 71 -128

3 33.33 80.00 113.33 70 71 -127

4 25.00 75.00 100.00 60 71 -116

5 20.00 74.00 94.00 70 71 -115

6 16.67 75.00 91.67 80 71 -124

7 14.29 77.14 91.43 90 71 -143

8 12.50 81.25 93.75 110 71 -182

9 11.11 86.67 97.78 130 71 -241

10 10.00 93.00 103.00 150 71 -320

Page 13: Pure Competition

7-13

Shutdown Case

LO3

Cos

t and

Rev

enue

$200

150

100

50

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Output

MR = P

MC

AVC

ATC

P=$71

V = $74

Short-Run Shutdown PointP < Minimum AVC

$71 < $74

Page 14: Pure Competition

7-14

Marginal Cost and Short-Run Supply

LO4

The Supply Schedule of a Competitive Firm Confronted with Cost Data

PriceQuantitySupplied

Maximum Profit (+)Minimum Loss (-)

$151 10 + $480

131 9 +299

111 8 +138

91 7 -3

81 6 -64

71 0 -100

61 0 -100

Page 15: Pure Competition

7-15

Marginal Cost and Short-Run Supply

LO4

P1

0

Cos

t and

Rev

enue

s (D

olla

rs)

Quantity Supplied

MR1

P2 MR2

P3 MR3

P4 MR4

P5 MR5

MC

AVC

ATC

Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5

ab

c

d

e

S

Shut-Down Point (If P is Below)

Page 16: Pure Competition

7-16

3 Production Questions

LO4

Output Determination in Pure Competition in the Short RunQuestion AnswerShould this firm produce? Yes, if price is equal to, or greater

than, minimum average variable cost. This means that the firm is profitable or that its losses are less than its fixed cost.

What quantity should this firm produce?

Produce where MR (=P) = MC; there, profit is maximized (TR exceeds TC by a maximum amount) or loss is minimized.

Will production result in economic profit?

Yes if price exceeds average total cost (TR will exceed TC). No if average total cost exceeds price (TC will exceed TR).

Page 17: Pure Competition

7-17

Firm and Industry: Equilibrium

LO4

Firm and Market Supply and the Market Demand(1)

QuantitySupplied,

SingleFirm

(2)Total

QuantitySupplied,

1,000 Firms

(3)Product

Price

(4)Total

QuantityDemanded

10 10,000 $151 4,0009 9,000 131 6,0008 8,000 111 8,0007 7,000 91 9,0006 6,000 81 11,0000 0 71 13,0000 0 61 16,000

Page 18: Pure Competition

7-18

Firm and Industry: Equilibrium

LO4

Economicprofit

dATC

AVC

s = MC

$111 $111

D

S = ∑ MCs

8 8000

(a) Single Firm (a) Industry

Page 19: Pure Competition

7-19

Profit Maximization in the Long Run

• Easy entry and exit•The only long-run adjustment we

consider• Identical costs

•All firms in the industry have identical costs

• Constant-cost industry•Entry and exit do not affect resource

pricesLO5

Page 20: Pure Competition

7-20

Long-Run Equilibrium• Entry eliminates profits

•Firms enter•Supply increases•Price falls

• Exit eliminates losses•Firms exit•Supply decreases•Price rises

LO5

Page 21: Pure Competition

7-21

Entry Eliminates Economic Profits

LO5

(a)Single firm

(b)Industry

P P

q Q0 0100 90,00080,000 100,000

ATC

MR

MC

$60

50

40D1

S1

D2

$60

50

40

S2

Page 22: Pure Competition

7-22

Exit Eliminates Losses

LO5

(a)Single Firm

(b)Industry

P P

q Q0 0100 90,00080,000 100,000

ATC

MR

MC

$60

50

40D3

S3

D1

$60

50

40

S1

Page 23: Pure Competition

7-23

Long-Run Supply• Constant-cost industry

• Entry/exit does not affect LR ATC• Constant resource price• Special case

• Increasing-cost industry• Most industries• LR ATC increases with expansion• Specialized resources

• Decreasing-cost industryLO6

Page 24: Pure Competition

7-24

LR Supply: Constant-Cost Industry

LO6

P

0 Q90,000 100,000 110,000

Q3 Q1 Q2

$50

P1

P2

P3

SZ1 Z2Z3

D3 D1 D2

Page 25: Pure Competition

7-25

LR Supply: Increasing-Cost Industry

LO6

P

0 Q90,000 100,000 110,000

Q3 Q1 Q2

$50P1

S

Y1

Y2

Y3

D3D1

D2

$40

$55P2

P3

Page 26: Pure Competition

7-26

Pure Competition and Efficiency

• In the long run, efficiency is achieved• Productive efficiency

•Producing where P = min ATC• Allocative efficiency

•Producing where P = MC

LO6

Page 27: Pure Competition

7-27

Dynamic Adjustments

• Purely competitive markets will automatically adjust to•Changes in consumer tastes•Resource supplies•Technology

• Recall the “invisible hand”

LO6