Punjab Police Performance Data

7/24/2019 Punjab Police Performance Data

1/16

Punjab Police Performance

Data

1


2/16

Macro PictureMacro Picture% increase in crime & police strength from 1999 level% increase in crime & police strength from 1999 level

2002-09: Budget Increase 22% !trength Increased "% #rime IncSource: PPO data from Home Dept

182


3/16

P'()'M*+# ,rt P'.+/I)+ )( #'IMP')#*IM )((+'!3

Year Total ProclaimedOffenders

Budget Providedto Police (Million

Rs)

TOTALSantionedStrength of

Police

%age increase inPos (!r!t Yr "##")

%ageincrease in

Budget (!r!t

Yr "##")

%ageincrease in

total

sanctionedstrength ofPolice (!r!tYr "##")

$ 13888 7246 88094 -30.79 -55.74 -3.37

"### 10776 8292 90607 -68.56 -36.10 -0.50

"##$ 13115 9152 98343 -38.50 -23.31 7.41

"##" 18164 11285 91060 - - -

"##& 23630 16741 91058 23.13 32.59 -

"##' 25236 16648 121499 28.02 32.21 25.05

"## 27227 20702 128304 33.29 45.49 29.03

"## 26319 27439 145576 30.99 58.87 37.45

"##* 28713 30367 161345 36.74 62.84 43.56

"##+ 33401 30312 167886 45.62 62.77 45.76

"## 56854 43057 170031 212.94 281.5 86.7

Total "&'' $$ $#** '$#!*& 3


4/16

Due to lack of external overi!"t# follo$in! $eapon con%cated remained

unaccounted for and ame "ave not been depoited in &alk"ana.

'renade ( 3)*3

+ala"inkov ( )281

,i-e ( *8*/

'un ( /303 ,evolver Pitol ( 3)2*8/

arbine ( )3/3

artrid!e ( 312)2/

S"arp 4d!e 5eapon ( 180)

Similarl6 follo$in! 7uantitie of arcotic con%cated remained

unaccounted for. Heroin Sei9ed +!; ( /12 Opium Sie9ed +!; ( /3* "ara Sie9ed +!; ( 138


5/16

Independent ataIndependent ata#omplaints 4efore #ourt of !essions 2002-0"#omplaints 4efore #ourt of !essions 2002-0"

2002-09: #omplaints5657 8)s Maor Penalt $9 8)s ismiss

1

Source: PPO data from Home Dept.

)


6/16

YearMinor

Penaltiesim,osed

Minor ,enaltiesim,osed agaist

-Os

Removal fromServiceim,osed

Removal fromService agianst

-Os

.ismissalfrom

Service

.ismissalfrom Service

for -os

TotalA,,eals/Re,resentations against

orders,refferred

Total ordersset aside in

A,,eals/Re,resestations

"## 30791 32

105

0 1709 1 3127 1617

"##* 42744 31

256

0 2399 0 4380 2042

"##+ 47936 54

317

1 2582 0 4671 2179

2009 43433 26 207 - 2553 2 4832 2312

0


7/16

@nveti!ation A Proecution Performance22B

Source: PPO data from Home Dept.10/


8/16

Public Safet6 ommiion 2*

ational ommiion =ot" Oppoition member# Hanif>bbai and a6er =ok"ari#t"emelve arreted upon %rt pretext

8

Source: PPO data from Home De t.


9/16

?ranparenc6 @nternationalSurve6 22 A 20

Police conidered to be t"e motcorrupt or!ani9ation in Pakitan in22 and 20

@n 22# it $a reported to be motcorrupt b6 2/.0C $"erea in 20t"i increaed to 0/C


10/16

Most #orrupt !ectors in the #ountr 2002-05PB2/;Sectors Percent*

Police 27.68Power 15.26

Taxation 12.69

Judiciary 9.54

Customs 8.56

Healt 5.41

!and 5.18

"ducation #.#8

Tele$one 2.24

%ailway 1.24

&'(s ).#9

Post (**ice ).#1

+an, ).19

(ters--7.9#

Total 1001


11/16

;penditure of #onsumer on Bri4es4 !ector #umulative3 PB28;

Sectors Percentage

Police 26

Power /0a$da "3C 6

Tax e$artment 18

Healt #

"ducation 12

!and dmn. 16

Judiciary 19 11


12/16

?"e t"ree mot utili9ed ervice $erePolice 52%Po$er 1/C

and ?axation 13C follo$ed b6 Healt"# 4ducation# dminitration and udiciar6.

/he most fre(irst Investigation 'eport? (I'3

follo$ed b6 Eviolation of traFc ruleG and to !et a releae

from a Efale arretG.

100% of the respondents ,ho had had contact ,ith the

police over the previous ear faced corruption.

>ccordin! to t"e urve6 conducted b6 @4?,=# )C of t"e

people paid an avera!e of ,. 28#/*/ to Police.PB20;

12

Due to intelli!ence failure and ne!li!ence of Police to preempt


13/16

Due to intelli!ence failure and ne!li!ence of Police to preempt

terrorit attack t"e 1191" amount "ad to be paid a

compenation to t"e familie of deceaed.

In Million3 Head &one6 Paid for @denti%cation of >ccued (

12$5

ompenation paid to familie of deceaed (

1191"

13


14/16

1*


15/16

#iti@ens Perceptions: !ome#iti@ens Perceptions: !ome

statisticsstatistics

!urve conducted 4 +'B in 2002 and repeated in!urve conducted 4 +'B in 2002 and repeated in200200o In 2004 only 25% households were inclined

to contact police for a matter of personalsafety

o Number of vulnerable household willing tocontact police declined since 2002

o Only 28% of households in un!ab believedthat presence of police in their ma"es them

feel safe

o In 2002# only $2% of households reportedcontact with police in the last five years

1)


16/16

!ome statistics!ome statistics#iti@ens perceptions A !urve conducted 4 +'B in#iti@ens perceptions A !urve conducted 4 +'B in

2002 and repeated in 2002002 and repeated in 200

o In 2002# only less than half of thehouseholds in un!ab &48%' reportedregistration of an (I) as a result oftheir contact with police

o In 2002# only 2*% of the householdwere satisfied with the way police

treated them during their contact withthem

o Out of these# only $+% reported to

have received !ustice from police 10

Documents

Punjab Police Performance Data