181
Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites Sydney Tar Ponds Agency Sydney, Nova Scotia Prepared for: Transportation and Public Works Sydney Tar Ponds Agency, 1 Inglis Street, Sydney, Nova Scotia B1P 6J7 Prepared by: Earth Tech Canada Inc. 105 Commerce Valley Drive West Markham, Ontario L3T 7W3 November 1, 2005 Project No 85989

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    9

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Pumping Test

Technical Memo Report

Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites Sydney Tar Ponds Agency

Sydney, Nova Scotia

Prepared for: Transportation and Public Works Sydney Tar Ponds Agency, 1 Inglis Street, Sydney, Nova Scotia B1P 6J7 Prepared by: Earth Tech Canada Inc. 105 Commerce Valley Drive West Markham, Ontario L3T 7W3 November 1, 2005

Project No 85989

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page i Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

Table of Contents

1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................1

2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION.................................................................................1

3. OBJECTIVES OF THE PUMPING TEST PROGRAM ..............................................2

4. METHODS AND PROCEDURES ..................................................................................3

4.1. Drilling ...................................................................................................................3 4.2. Piezometer Installation...........................................................................................4 4.3. Monitor Inspection and Inventory ..........................................................................4 4.4. Groundwater Monitoring .......................................................................................4 4.5. Hydraulic Testing ...................................................................................................5 4.6. Groundwater Sampling ..........................................................................................7 4.7. Quality Assurance / Quality Control......................................................................8

5. DEVIATIONS FROM THE WORK PLAN ...................................................................8

6. PUMPING TEST PROGRAM FINDINGS ....................................................................9

6.1. Boundary Conditions............................................................................................10 6.2. Recovery Analysis ................................................................................................11 6.3. Theis Non-Equilibrium Method............................................................................12 6.4. Jacob Straight Line Method .................................................................................13 6.5. Hantush-Jacob Leaky Aquifer Method.................................................................15 6.6. Groundwater Sampling ........................................................................................16

7. SUMMARY......................................................................................................................16

8. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................16

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page i Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

Drawings Drawing No. TM 5-1: Pumping Test Monitoring Well Network Drawing No. TM 5-2: Static Water Levels - Upper Bedrock Drawing No. TM 5-3: Maximum Drawdown - Upper Bedrock Tables Table 1: Monitors Selected for Inclusion in the Pumping Test Program Table 2: Maximum Drawdown Observed During the Pumping Test Program Table 3: Summary of Hydraulic Parameters Calculated Table 4: Summary of Analytical Results Appendices Appendix A: Water Level Graphs Appendix B: Manual Data Appendix C: Borehole Logs Appendix D: Analytical Results

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 1 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

1. Introduction This technical memorandum presents the results of step-drawdown and long-term, constant-rate pumping tests conducted in September 2005 at the Coke Ovens Site in Sydney, Nova Scotia. The pumping tests were conducted by Earth Tech Canada Inc. (Earth Tech) for the Sydney Tar Ponds Agency (STPA). The information developed as part of this testing program expands the hydrogeologic understanding of the site and aids the pre-design effort currently being undertaken by Earth Tech and CBCL.

Technical Memorandum No. 5 – Hydraulic Conductivity submitted to the STPA and dated September, 2005 indicated that the current understanding of the hydraulic conductivity in the shallow bedrock underlying the site is based on a number of single-well hydraulic tests. These tests are only capable of measuring a limited volume of geologic material immediately surrounding the well. Conversely, pumping tests measure the hydraulic conductivity over a much larger volume (more consistent with the site scale), providing more representative results. As the hydraulic conductivity is a major factor in the design of the hydraulic controls at the Coke Ovens site, dictating the amount of water a particular hydraulic control would capture and the size of the resulting capture zone, one or more pumping tests were recommended.

2. Background Information Prior to this pumping test, there were no large-volume estimates of the bedrock hydraulic conductivity available. A representative estimate of the hydraulic conductivity is essential for characterizing groundwater flow and contaminant transport and for determining what types of corrective activities may be effective and their likely degree of effectiveness. The absence of reliable estimates of hydraulic conductivity and other hydraulic parameters was identified as a data gap early in the pre-design process.

Background information on the Coke Ovens site and the geology and hydrogeology are available in numerous documents, most notably the Muggah Creek Watershed Phase III Environmental Site and Risk Assessments Coke Ovens Site dated 2002.

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 2 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

3. Objectives of the Pumping Test Program The purpose of the pumping test program was to obtain estimates of a number of hydraulic parameters, including the hydraulic conductivity and storativity of the shallow bedrock and till hydrogeologic units, and to identify hydraulic interactions between the fill, till, and bedrock units. These results will be used to support the design of purge wells, interceptor trenches, and cutoff walls that are proposed as components of the site corrective actions.

The pumping test program consisted of a step-drawdown pumping test followed by a long-term, constant-rate pumping test. In a step-drawdown pumping test, pumping rates are progressively increased during successive periods (steps). Results from the step-drawdown pumping test are used to determine the optimum pumping rate for use in the long-term pumping test. A long-term pumping test is a test in which a constant pumping rate is used over a long time period (typically 72 hours) and, in combination with water level observations in monitoring wells, is used to estimate hydraulic conductivity, storativity, the potential influence of hydraulic boundaries (such as surface water bodies), and, in certain cases, can provide input on the influence and hydraulic properties of an overlying confining layer.

This technical memorandum was prepared to document the results of the pumping test program, which included the following tasks:

• Task 1: Preparation of a site-specific Health and Safety Plan;

• Task 2: Procurement of a drilling contractor;

• Task 3: Drilling of a pumping well, two observation wells, and installation of three in-bank stream piezometers in Whitney Pier Brook and Coke Ovens Brook;

• Task 4: Assessment of existing monitors for inclusion in the monitoring network;

• Task 5: Monitoring of background groundwater conditions;

• Task 6: Performance of a step-drawdown pumping test;

• Task 7: Monitoring of background groundwater conditions,

• Task 8: Performance of a long-term (72 hour), constant-rate pumping test (including obtaining three groundwater samples);

• Task 9: Monitoring of recovery from the pumping test; and

• Task 10: Assessment and interpretation of collected data.

These tasks were detailed in the Work Plan (Earth Tech, September 2005).

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 3 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

4. Methods and Procedures

4.1. Drilling The pumping well (designated CONPK-200PW) was installed in the northwest corner of the Coke Ovens Site immediately adjacent to the Domtar Area (Drawing No. TM 5-1). The location was selected because it met the following criteria:

• it is central to the general area of the site where purge wells, infiltration trenches, and cutoff walls may be installed;

• it is away from areas known to be impacted with immiscible phases, minimizing the likelihood of pumping separate phase liquids during the test; and

• it is within an area where there is a relatively high density of pre-existing monitoring wells, maximizing the number of data collection points available.

Several monitors deemed significant to the pumping test program were decommissioned just prior to the start of the pumping test program. Consequently, the closest usable monitoring points were more than 65 m away. As the response at this distance was anticipated to be relatively low, two additional monitors were installed nearby. These monitors were completed at similar depths to the pumping well and constructed in a similar manner. One of the additional monitors was installed at a distance of about 19 m from the pumping well (CODT-200MW) and the second was installed at a distance of about 42 m from the pumping well (CONPK-201MW).

The wells were drilled with a Reichdrill T650-WII down-the-hole hammer. To minimize the possibility of moving contaminants downward, the monitors were drilled in a staged manner. During the first stage, a large diameter casing was driven through the overburden to the bedrock surface. The overburden was removed from the interior of this casing and the smaller-diameter permanent casing was driven about 1 m into the bedrock. The exterior casing was then removed and the annulus sealed with Baroid Quickgrout. During the second stage, the down-the-hole hammer was used to pulverize the rock to a depth of 11 m below the bedrock surface, resulting in total depths between 16.7 m and 19.8 m below ground surface. The monitoring well was left as an open hole from the base of the casing to the bottom of the well and was established to monitor the Morien Bedrock that underlies the site. The diameter of the monitoring wells was 254 mm. The diameter of the pumping well was larger, at 305 mm, to accommodate the submersible pump and monitoring equipment.

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 4 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

4.2. Piezometer Installation Three mini-piezometers, consisting of 2 cm ID iron pipe with a stainless steel screened drive point, were installed in selected locations in the brooks surrounding the pumping test location. The mini-piezometers were installed, using a slide hammer, at least 0.5 m into the sediments at the edge of the brooks on the side closest to the pumping well. One mini-piezometer was installed on the west side of Whitney Pier Brook near the underdrain culvert outfall and two mini-piezometers were installed in the bank of Coke Ovens Brook, one at the intersection of Whitney Pier Brook and Coke Ovens Brook and the second about 250 m to the west (Drawing No. TM 5-1).

4.3. Monitor Inspection and Inventory An inventory of all monitors within approximately 200 m of the pumping well was made to determine which monitors were available and capable of use. As part of the inventory, each of the following parameters was investigated and recorded:

• monitor location and any identifying marks were confirmed against site plans;

• monitor depths were checked for consistency with construction details (if available);

• monitor stick-ups were checked for consistency with construction details (if available); and

• monitors were inspected for condition (seals, casing integrity, etc.).

The objective of the inventory was to determine which monitors were capable of providing representative information. Monitors selected for inclusion in the pumping test program are listed in Table 1.

4.4. Groundwater Monitoring Groundwater levels were measured to determine static groundwater elevations (Drawing No. TM 5-2), groundwater response to the pumping tests, and hydraulic gradients. Measurements were made using both an interface meter, to check for the presence of immiscible phases in the monitor, and standard water level meters. Although a number of different meters were used (from both Heron Instruments and Solinst), typically meters were dedicated to a series of monitors to ensure measurements were consistent with one another.

Groundwater measurements were also made using a network of eight pressure transducers. The transducers (In-Situ Minitrolls) were placed in monitors deemed to be significant, including the pumping well, observation monitors in both overburden and bedrock, and in one of the in-bank stream piezometers. The pressure transducers were set to measure the water level on intervals that varied depending on the anticipated response in the monitor and the monitoring stage. For

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 5 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

instance, in monitoring for static conditions before the testing, the monitoring interval varied up to 10 minutes. During critical stages of the pumping tests (particularly immediately following the initiation of pumping), the monitoring interval in the highest-response monitor (the pumping well) was 0.5 second, while other critical monitors were measured at an interval of up to 10 seconds. In all cases extensive manual measurements were used to back up the pressure transducers.

Groundwater monitoring in the entire network of 25 selected groundwater monitors and the 3 in-bank stream piezometers began on September 22 and was continued until recovery from the long-term pumping test was deemed sufficient on September 26. One of the main objectives of the background monitoring was to determine if the site monitors were influenced by tidal fluctuations and, if so, to what extent. No tidal influence was discernable from either the manual or transducer data set. However, three significant rain events occurred during the monitoring period, one on September 26, one on September 27, and one on September 29. A response to the rain events was observed in some bedrock monitors in each case.

4.5. Hydraulic Testing Step-Drawdown Pumping Test

The step-drawdown pumping test was conducted on September 23 starting at 11h30 and ending at 17h30. The response of the water level to pumping was monitored in the pumping well (CONPK-200PW) and in the two recently installed monitors (CODT-200MW and CONPK-201MW), although at much lower priority. The intent of the step-drawdown test was to apply progressively increasing pumping rates to the pumping well to establish the optimum pumping rate for long-term pumping test.

The submersible pump was set at approximately 3 m above the base of the pumping well and was installed several hours before the start of the test to ensure the water level had returned to static prior to the initiation of the test. Water was directed from the pump through a particle filter, through a dole valve manifold, and discharged about 80 m away on the ground surface. A dole valve is a water flow restrictor that uses a deformable gasket to variously restrict water flow at different pressure levels, maintaining a consistent flow rate. It’s particularly useful for pumping tests as it forces the pumping rate to remain quite consistent over a range of pressures. The dole valve manifold was comprised of a series of dole valves of different ratings (i.e., 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 US gallons per minute). Pumping rates other than those included on the manifold were obtained by operating more than one dole valve in parallel.

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 6 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

In addition to using a dole valve, the pumping rate was measured manually at least once during each step. Manual pumping rate measurements were made by determining the amount of time it took the discharging groundwater to fill a graduated container of 15 l capacity. Although the measurements agreed reasonably with the rating of the selected dole valve, the discharge method, considered more reliable, tended to indicate a pumping rate averaging about 22% higher than the dole valve rating.

A pumping rate of about 2 l/min was selected for the first step. A rate of 2.25 l/min was established and maintained for 101 minutes resulting in a maximum drawdown of about 0.55 m for the first step. A pumping rate of 4 l/min was selected for the second step although a consistent pumping rate of 5 l/min was obtained. The duration of the second step was 68 minutes with a maximum total drawdown of approximately 1.2 m. As the original intent of the step-drawdown pumping test was to obtain a total drawdown that approached the pump, it was decided in the field to substantially increase the pumping rate. As such, a pumping rate of about 15 l/min was selected for the third step. A pumping rate of 23 l/min was established and maintained for 29 minutes before the water level in the pumping well intersected the pump at about 13.3 m of drawdown, ending the test. Following a recovery period of 74 minutes, a pumping rate of 8.75 l/min was established and maintained for 79 minutes with a maximum total drawdown of about 12.44 m.

Consequently, a pumping rate of about 6 l/min was judged to be appropriate for the long-term, constant rate pumping test.

Long-Term Constant Rate Pumping Test

The long-term pumping test was initiated on September 26 allowing for more than two days of recovery from the step-drawdown pumping test. Groundwater monitoring was conducted in 25 selected groundwater monitors and three in-bank stream piezometers. The submersible pump was installed early in the morning and pre-test water levels were obtained from the entire monitoring network.

The submersible pump was set at approximately 3 m above the base of the well and was installed several hours before the start of the test to ensure the water level had returned to static prior to the initiation of the test. Water was directed from the pump through the particle filter and through a combination of two dole valves (two were required to obtain the proposed flow rate). Water flow from the dole valves was directed through separate pipes, with water from the higher capacity dole valve (about 5 l/min) discharging about 80 m away on the ground surface and water from the lower capacity dole valve (about 2 l/min) discharging about 5 m away on the ground surface.

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 7 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

As with the step-drawdown pumping test, manual measurements of the flow rate were made periodically throughout the test. In this case, the manual pumping rate measurements were made by determining the amount of time it took the individual discharge lines to fill a 15 l graduated container or a 1 l graduated cylinder. The graduated cylinder was included as there was some question raised regarding the accuracy of the graduated 15 l container. Discharge measurements made using both containers agreed very closely with one another and agreed reasonably with the rating of the selected dole valves. However, as during the step-drawdown pumping test, the manual measurements indicated a pumping rate fluctuating between 17% and 29% higher than the dole valve rating.

The long-term pumping test was initiated at 10h50 on September 26 and continued uneventfully until September 29 at 09h05. Water level monitoring was continued until after 13h00 to characterize as much of the recovery as possible. Observed drawdowns in the bedrock hydrogeologic unit ranged from a maximum in the pumping well of 5.8 m with no readily observable impact beyond about 175 m (Drawing No. TM 5-3). Low but consistent observations of impact were also made in a number of monitors completed in the overburden, with a maximum drawdown of 0.165 m. No discernable impacts were observed in the in-bank stream piezometers. The maximum drawdowns observed are listed in Table 2.

4.6. Groundwater Sampling Groundwater samples were collected at the pumping well at three times during the long-term pumping test. The purpose of collecting the samples was to determine if the geochemical character or the concentration of contaminants was affected by the water withdrawal.

The first sample was obtained about 2 hours into the pumping test, the second sample after about 36 hours, and the third sample just prior to termination of the pumping test. Samples were sent to Maxxam Laboratories in Sydney and were analyzed for metals, semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), and petroleum hydrocarbons (Atlantic PIRI Guideline 1.0). During sampling the pH, dissolved oxygen content, and conductivity of the groundwater was also measured.

Sample results are discussed further in Section 6.

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 8 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

4.7. Quality Assurance / Quality Control A number of procedures were employed to ensure the information obtained during the pumping tests was reliable and of acceptable quality, including the following:

• as indicated, extensive manual water level measurements were made in all monitors equipped with pressure transducers to provide a backup in case the transducer failed and to calibrate the output from the transducer;

• the transducers were downloaded following each stage of monitoring and transducers installed in critical monitors were downloaded multiple times during the long-term pumping test to ensure the transducers were operating correctly;

• wherever possible, water level meters were dedicated to a specific series of monitors to ensure the measurements remained comparable; and

• backup pumping rate measurements were made throughout the pumping tests.

5. Deviations from the Work Plan As indicated, the original Work Plan did not include the drilling of two monitoring wells in addition to the pumping well. However, a number of significant monitors were decommissioned as part of the brook realignment program just prior to the pumping test program, necessitating the drilling of additional monitors.

As well, the pumping rates proposed in the workplan were higher than the pumping rates actually used, as the drilling contractors advised that they felt it was unlikely that the well could sustain the proposed pumping rates. The difference is due to the then-existing knowledge of the hydraulic conductivity (as used in the numerical model) and the degree of drawdown intended for the test.

Discharge water was originally intended to be piped some distance from the pumping well into a geotextile fabric filter bag to collect silt and sediment. The geotextile filter bag was to be placed on the ground surface away from surface water. Following assessment of the capabilities of the pumping well by the drilling contractors, the decision was made in consultation with the STPA to employ an in-line filter and simply discharge the relatively low volume of pumped groundwater onto the ground surface away from the pumping well and surface water.

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 9 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

Lastly, a total of ten pressure transducers were originally intended to be used during the pumping tests. However, Earth Tech was only able to obtain a total of eight units prior to commencement of the field work.

6. Pumping Test Program Findings In interpreting the information collected during the Pumping Test Program, the assumption was made that the upper bedrock hydrogeologic unit can be interpreted and characterized using porous media techniques. Although there is little information available concerning the density and distribution of fractures in the upper bedrock, the approach in the investigative work conducted at the Coke Ovens Site thus far has been to treat the unit as an equivalent porous medium. This work follows the established precedent.

A variety of interpretive methods were utilized to provide a broad assessment of those data collected. In this manner, the various interpretive methods provide an internal verification that the calculated value is reasonable and consistent and that there are no significant errors in the interpretation.

The methods outlined in the following sections were used to derive transmissivity and storativity values for the upper bedrock hydrogeologic unit and, using the leaky confining aquifer method, the vertical hydraulic conductivity and storativity of the confining unit. The results from the various methods, which were applied manually rather than using interpretive software, are quite consistent with one another.

Note that each of the methods calculates transmissivity, which is related to hydraulic conductivity by the thickness of the hydrogeologic unit. In this case it was difficult to assign a thickness as the unit of interest is the upper, fractured zone of the bedrock which likely gradually becomes less permeable (less fractured) with depth rather than having a defined base. Consequently, a unit thickness of 10 m was used to express the calculated transmissivity values as hydraulic conductivity.

The analytical methods and findings of the Pumping Test Program are presented in the following sections.

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 10 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

6.1. Boundary Conditions From a theoretical standpoint, any deviation from the ideal drawdown response curve (as defined by the Theis type curve) is a result of interaction with or changes in a hydraulic boundary. For instance, as the cone of depression (the area experiencing water level drawdown) expands, it may intersect different geologic material or it may intersect a body of surface water, resulting in a change of slope on the time versus drawdown curve. Intersections with hydraulic boundaries such as a surface water body, increased infiltration resulting from a rain event, or groundwater contribution from an overlying or underlying confining unit would be expected to decrease the rate of drawdown, resulting in flattening of the time versus drawdown curve. Conversely, the impact of an increase in the pumping rate in the pumping well or pumping in some other local well would be expected to increase the rate of drawdown.

As can be seen from the time versus water level graphs included in Appendix A, the curves are not always smooth and show some definite interaction with a hydraulic boundary. In a number of monitors there is a definite correlation with a rain event that occurred on September 27. However, there was an increase in the drawdown that occurred in some monitors during the early response to the rain event (e.g., CONPK-201MW, CODT-005MWC, and COTS-001MWB). The cause of the increased drawdown is not known, however, the pattern of water level response suggests that it could be due to a hydraulic barrier (e.g., a low-K zone at the leading edge of the drawdown cone. Other possible explanations include impacts resulting from the large amount of abandoned infrastructure or impacts related to switching between confined and unconfined conditions. In any case, the curves demonstrate that the hydraulic regime is somewhat complex.

The main interaction with a boundary condition interpreted from the time versus drawdown graphs is groundwater leakage from the overlying confining layer (the till). This is discussed in more detail in Section 6.5.

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 11 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

6.2. Recovery Analysis A recovery analysis is a numerical interpretive method that utilizes the magnitude of the residual drawdown following termination of the pumping test and the previously-applied pumping rate to determine transmissivity. This type of analysis is particularly convenient for use in the pumping well as the water level in a pumping well can not be used for other traditional interpretive methods due to well loss. The equation used in a recovery analysis is (Domenico and Schwartz, 1990):

'log

43.2'

tt

TQs

π=∆

where: 's∆ is the residual drawdown, Q is the previously-applied pumping rate,

T is the transmissivity, t is the time since pumping started, and 't is the time since pumping stopped.

Recovery analyses were performed in a total of six monitors, including the pumping well, using both manual and transducer-derived data. The analysis was performed for each data set at a number of times during the recovery period and the median of those analyses was taken as most representative.

The median transmissivity calculated using the recovery analyses is 1.4x10-4 m2/s and the corresponding hydraulic conductivity is 1.4x10-5 m/s (Table 3).

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 12 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

6.3. Theis Non-Equilibrium Method The Theis Non-Equilibrium method is the standard method for interpreting pumping test results. One of the advantages to using the Theis method is that, as it is a non-equilibrium method, the storativity of the hydrogeologic unit can also be determined. The method involves plotting time versus drawdown curves for each observation monitor and matching them against a type curve. A match point is selected and the values obtained from each graph are used in the following equations (Domenico and Schwartz, 1990; Fetter, 1994):

)(4

uWs

QTπ

=

24

ruTtS =

where: T is the residual drawdown, Q is the pumping rate,

s is the drawdown, )(uW is the well function (taken from the type curve),

S is the storativity, u is a dimensionless constant (taken from the type curve), t is the time since pumping started, and r is the distance from the pumping well to the observation monitor.

The median transmissivity derived using the Theis non-equilibrium interpretation method is 1.2x10-4 m2/s, which corresponds with a hydraulic conductivity of 1.2x10-5 m/s (Table 3).

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 13 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

6.4. Jacob Straight Line Method The Jacob Straight Line Method is a modification of the Theis Non-Equilibrium Method where the procedure can be simplified for large values of time. The modification allows the method to be applied in two ways. Calculations may be made using time versus drawdown observations from a single monitor or they may be made using distance versus drawdown observations made in multiple monitors (essentially the Thiem equilibrium solution).

Using the time versus drawdown method two points on the curve are selected and used in the following equations (Domenico and Schwartz, 1990):

1

212 log

43.2

tt

TQss

π=−

2025.2

rTtS =

where: s is the drawdown (the subscripts refer to time 1 and time 2), Q is the pumping rate,

T is the transmissivity, t is the time since pumping started (the subscripts refer to time 1 and time 2), S is the storativity,

0t is the time intercept where the line intercepts the zero drawdown axis, and

r is the distance from the pumping well to the observation monitor.

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 14 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

In a similar manner, the drawdown at two or more monitors can be used to plot a distance versus drawdown curve and any two points on that curve can be used in the following equations (Domenico and Schwartz, 1990):

1

212 log

43.2

rr

TQss

π=−

20

25.2r

TtS =

where: s is the drawdown (the subscripts refer to distance 1 and distance 2), Q is the pumping rate,

T is the transmissivity, r is the distance from the pumping well to the observation monitor (the subscripts

refer to distance 1 and distance 2), S is the storativity, t is the time since pumping started, and

0r is the intercept where the line intercepts the zero drawdown axis.

Using the Jacob time versus drawdown calculation, the interpreted median transmissivity is 1.7x10-4m2/s, which corresponds to a hydraulic conductivity of 1.7x10-5 m/s, while the transmissivity calculated using the distance-drawdown method is 4.2x10-5 m2/s, which corresponds to a hydraulic conductivity of 4.2x10-6 m/s (Table 3).

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 15 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

6.5. Hantush-Jacob Leaky Aquifer Method Where the time versus drawdown curve deviates from the Theis type curve as a result of groundwater entering the system from a confining unit, the Hantush-Jacob method of interpreting results from a leaky aquifer may be used. This method likewise involves curve matching although with a family of type curves rather than a single type curve. The significant advantage to using this method is that the vertical hydraulic conductivity of the confining unit can be determined. As with the Theis method, a match point is selected and the values obtained from each graph are used in the following calculation (Domenico and Schwartz, 1990, Fetter, 1994):

)( BruW

sQT ,

4π=

24

ruTtS =

( )2

''

rB

rTbK =

where: T is the transmissivity, Q is the pumping rate,

s is the drawdown, )( B

ruW , is the leaky well function (taken from the type curve),

S is the storativity, u is a dimensionless constant (taken from the type curve), t is the time since pumping started, r is the distance from the pumping well to the observation monitor, 'K is the vertical hydraulic conductivity of the bounding layer, 'b is the thickness of the bounding layer, and

Br is a dimensionless constant (taken from the type curve).

The median transmissivity calculated for the upper bedrock hydrogeologic unit using the Hantush-Jacob leaky aquifer method is 7.4x10-5 m2/s, corresponding to a hydraulic conductivity of 7.4x10-6 m/s (Table 3). The median vertical hydraulic conductivity calculated for the till hydrogeologic unit is 1.7x10-8 m/s, assuming the till unit averages about 2 m in thickness in the area of interest (a reasonable approximation). Horizontal hydraulic conductivity would likely be somewhat greater (perhaps an order of magnitude), due to the horizontal structure and fabric of the till.

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Page 16 Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

6.6. Groundwater Sampling As indicated groundwater samples were obtained from the pumping well (CONPK-200PW) 2 hours after the start of the test on September 26, approximately 36 hours into the test on September 27, and just before the conclusion of the test on September 29. The collected groundwater was analyzed for suites of general geochemical analytes, VOCs, SVOCs, and petroleum hydrocarbons.

The analytical testing indicates that during the course of the pump test the geochemical character of the groundwater remained consistent. In addition, VOCs, SVOCs, and petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected at any point during the test.

Analytical results are summarized in Table 4 and the certificates of analysis are included in Appendix D.

7. Summary The Pumping Test Program determined that the hydraulic conductivity of the upper bedrock hydrogeologic unit, assuming the fractured medium can be represented as an equivalent porous medium, is approximately 1x10-5 m/s. The storativity of the unit was calculated at 6.8 x10-4. The vertical hydraulic conductivity of the till hydrogeologic unit was calculated at 1.7x10-8 m/s.

Analytical testing indicates that pumping over a long period at the pumping well (CONPK-200PW) did not appreciably affect the geochemical character of the groundwater. Further, no VOCs, SVOCs, or petroleum hydrocarbons were detected at any time.

8. References Domenico, P.A., and Schwartz, F.W., 1990, Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology, John Wiley &

Sons

Fetter,C.W., 1994, Applied Hydrogeology, 3rd Edition, Macmillan College Publishing Company.

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

Drawings Drawing No. TM 5-1: Pumping Test Monitoring Well Network Drawing No. TM 5-2: Static Water Levels - Upper Bedrock Drawing No. TM 5-3: Maximum Drawdown - Upper Bedrock

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

Tables Table 1: Monitors Selected for Inclusion in the Pumping Test Program Table 2: Maximum Drawdown Observed During the Pumping Test Program Table 3: Summary of Hydraulic Parameters Calculated Table 4: Summary of Analytical Results

Table 1: Monitors Selected for Inclusion in the Pumping Test Program PN 85989

Monitor Name InstallationDate Location Monitoring Zone

Monitor Depth

(m)

Ground Elevation(m asl)

Reference Elevation(m asl)

Easting(m)

Northing(m)

Distance from Pumping Well

(m)COBP-004MWA 15/Sep/00 Benzol Plant Shallow Bedrock 5.37 14.06 14.67 4602266.88 5113019.88 175.66COBP-004MWB 15/Sep/00 Benzol Plant Shallow Bedrock 8.13 14.06 14.67 4602266.15 5113019.50 175.43COBP-004MWC 9/Aug/00 Benzol Plant Intermediate Bedrock 18.45 14.05 14.65 4602263.93 5113019.14 174.15COBP-005MWA 16/Sep/00 Benzol Plant Fill/Till 4.16 12.47 12.93 4602292.93 5113095.34 157.39COBP-005MWB 15/Aug/00 Benzol Plant Shallow Bedrock 8.08 12.51 12.97 4602293.45 5113094.06 158.29COBT-002MWA 4/Oct/00 Benzol Tank Fill/Till 6.75 15.95 16.46 4602210.86 5112981.92 176.41COBT-002MWB 6/Sep/00 Benzol Tank Shallow Bedrock 12.62 16.06 16.41 4602206.96 5112982.20 174.69COBT-100MW 16/Oct/01 Benzol Tank Intermediate Bedrock 18.42 15.57 14.96 4602199.96 5112973.98 180.07COCP-002MW 15/Aug/00 Coal Pile Runway Shallow Bedrock 8.08 13.48 13.94 4602276.70 5113122.98 134.93COCP-107MW 19/Oct/01 Benzol Plant Shallow Bedrock 10 12.65 13.09 4602249.22 5113099.50 115.03CODT-004MW 12/Oct/00 Domtar Area Shallow Bedrock 7.65 12.84 13.6 4602037.07 5113136.67 106.83CODT-005MWA 16/Sep/00 Domtar Area Fill/Till 4.78 15.04 15.72 4602086.02 5113175.12 64.96CODT-005MWB 16/Sep/00 Domtar Area Shallow Bedrock 9.35 15.01 15.46 4602085.34 5113176.24 66.08CODT-005MWC 11/Aug/00 Domtar Area Intermediate Bedrock 9.95 15.11 15.62 4602085.93 5113178.34 66.59CODT-007MW 12/Oct/00 Domtar Area Shallow Bedrock 6.78 11.76 12.27 4602039.43 5113048.06 142.27CODT-200MW 20/Sep/05 Domtar Area Intermediate Bedrock 16.76 14.78 14.52 4602124.92 5113141.16 19.04CONPK-200PW 20/Sep/05 Non-Point Source Area K Intermediate Bedrock 16.76 15.13 14.52 4602143.57 5113144.99 0.00CONPK-201MW 20/Sep/05 Non-Point Source Area K Intermediate Bedrock 19.81 14.8 14.35 4602171.39 5113113.55 41.98COTS-001MWA 7/Sep/00 Tar Storage Fill/Till 3.25 13.56 14.07 4602200.76 5113091.43 78.36COTS-001MWB 7/Sep/00 Tar Storage Shallow Bedrock 10.87 13.57 14.08 4602200.13 5113093.23 76.67PN88-4A 11/Sep/88 Domtar Area Shallow Bedrock 9.78 12.59 11.84 4602037.01 5113110.93 111.87PN88-4B 12/Sep/88 Domtar Area Fill/Till 4.6 12.56 11.93 4602037.01 5113110.93 111.87PN88-5A 22/Sep/88 Domtar Area Shallow/Intermediate Bedrock 18.4 11.68 11.14 4602071.43 5112986.41 174.22PN88-5B 22/Sep/88 Domtar Area Shallow Bedrock 9 11.65 11.13 4602071.43 5112986.41 174.22PN88-5C 22/Sep/88 Domtar Area Fill/Till 4 11.55 10.99 4602071.43 5112986.41 174.22COB 1 PIEZ 20/Sep/05 Domtar Area Fill/Till 11.167 4602250.00 5113060.00 136.00COB 2 PIEZ 20/Sep/05 Domtar Area Fill/Till 10.441 4602150.00 5113010.00 135.00WP PIEZ 20/Sep/05 Domtar Area Fill/Till 11.578 4602210.00 5113120.00 70.00

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Tables.xls Page 1 of 1

Table 2: Maximum Drawdown Observed During the Pumping Test Program PN 85989

Monitor Name Location Monitoring ZoneDistance from Pumping Well

(m)

Maximum Observed Drawdown

(m)COBP-004MWA Benzol Plant Shallow Bedrock 175.66 0.015COBP-004MWB Benzol Plant Shallow Bedrock 175.43 0.011COBP-004MWC Benzol Plant Intermediate Bedrock 174.15 0.006COBP-005MWA Benzol Plant Fill/Till 157.39 0.01COBP-005MWB Benzol Plant Shallow Bedrock 158.29 0.012COBT-002MWA Benzol Tank Fill/Till 176.41 0.036COBT-002MWB Benzol Tank Shallow Bedrock 174.69 0.046COBT-100MW Benzol Tank Intermediate Bedrock 180.07 0.046COCP-002MW Coal Pile Runway Shallow Bedrock 134.93 0.032COCP-107MW Benzol Plant Shallow Bedrock 115.03 0.017CODT-004MW Domtar Area Shallow Bedrock 106.83 0.082CODT-005MWA Domtar Area Fill/Till 64.96 0.016CODT-005MWB Domtar Area Shallow Bedrock 66.08 0.416CODT-005MWC Domtar Area Intermediate Bedrock 66.59 0.145CODT-007MW Domtar Area Shallow Bedrock 142.27 0.056CODT-200MW Domtar Area Intermediate Bedrock 19.04 0.9CONPK-200PW Non-Point Source Area K Intermediate Bedrock 0.00 5.839CONPK-201MW Non-Point Source Area K Intermediate Bedrock 41.98 0.332COTS-001MWA Tar Storage Fill/Till 78.36 0.165COTS-001MWB Tar Storage Shallow Bedrock 76.67 0.077PN88-4A Domtar Area Shallow Bedrock 111.87 0.053PN88-4B Domtar Area Fill/Till 111.87 0.072PN88-5A Domtar Area Shallow/Intermediate Bedrock 174.22 0.07PN88-5B Domtar Area Shallow Bedrock 174.22 0.029PN88-5C Domtar Area Fill/Till 174.22 0.038

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Tables.xls Page 1 of 1

Table 3: Summary of Hydraulic Parameters Calculated PN 85989

Unit Method of InterpretationTransmissivity

(m2/s)Storativity

Hydraulic Conductivity

(m/s)Comments

Shallow/Intermediate Bedrock Jacob Staight Line Distance-Drawdown 4.21E-05 1.45E-03 4.21E-06Shallow/Intermediate Bedrock Jacob Staight Line Time-Drawdown 1.65E-04 5.65E-04 1.65E-05Shallow/Intermediate Bedrock Recovery Time-Drawdown 1.40E-04 1.40E-05Shallow/Intermediate Bedrock Theis Non-Equilibrium Time-Drawdown 1.19E-04 7.80E-04 1.19E-05Shallow/Intermediate Bedrock Hantush-Jacob Leaky Confining Unit Time-Drawdown 7.40E-05 1.04E-03 7.40E-06

MEDIAN BEDROCK VALUES 1.19E-04 9.11E-04 1.19E-05

Till Hantush-Jacob Leaky Aquifer Time-Drawdown 1.67E-08 note: vertical

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Tables.xls Page 1 of 1

Table 4: Summary of Analytical Results PN 85989

ATLANTIC VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IN WATER PACKAGESampling Date 9/26/2005 9/27/2005 9/29/2005 9/27/2005 9/27/2005

Units RDL PT-1 PT-2 PT-3 TRIP BLANK FIELD BLANK1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND ND ND1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND ND1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDChlorobenzene ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND ND1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND ND1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND ND1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L 2 ND ND ND ND ND1,1-Dichloroethylene ug/L 2 ND ND ND ND ND1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND ND1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDBenzene ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDBromodichloromethane ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDBromoform ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDBromomethane ug/L 8 ND ND ND ND NDCarbon Tetrachloride ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDChloroethane ug/L 8 ND ND ND ND NDChloroform ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDChloromethane ug/L 8 ND ND ND ND NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/L 2 ND ND ND ND NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 2 ND ND ND ND NDDibromochloromethane ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDEthylbenzene ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDEthylene Dibromide ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDMethylene Chloride (Dichloromethane) ug/L 3 ND ND ND 11 10o-Xylene ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDp+m-Xylene ug/L 2 ND ND ND ND NDStyrene ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDTetrachloroethylene ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDToluene ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/L 2 ND ND ND ND NDtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDTrichloroethylene ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND NDTrichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) ug/L 8 ND ND ND ND NDVinyl Chloride ug/L 1 ND ND ND ND ND

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection Limit

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Tables.xls Page 1 of 5

Table 4: Summary of Analytical Results PN 85989

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MSSampling Date 9/26/2005 9/27/2005 9/29/2005

Units RDL PT-1 PT-2 PT-3Acenaphthene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDAcenaphthylene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDAcridine ug/L 2 ND ND NDAnthracene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDBenzo(a)anthracene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDBenzo(a)pyrene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDBenzo(b/j)fluoranthene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDBenzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDBenzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L 0.2 ND ND ND1-Chloronaphthalene ug/L 1 ND ND ND2-Chloronaphthalene ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDChrysene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDDibenzo(a,h)anthracene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDFluoranthene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDFluorene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/L 0.2 ND ND ND1-Methylnaphthalene ug/L 0.2 ND ND ND2-Methylnaphthalene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDNaphthalene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDPhenanthrene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDPyrene ug/L 0.2 ND ND NDQuinoline ug/L 2 ND ND ND1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDHexachlorobenzene ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDPentachlorobenzene ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND2-Chlorophenol ug/L 0.3 ND ND ND4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDm/p-Cresol ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDo-Cresol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND2,3-Dichlorophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND2,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L 0.3 ND ND ND2,5-Dichlorophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND2,6-Dichlorophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND3,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND3,5-Dichlorophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND2,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND2,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L 2 ND ND ND4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ug/L 2 ND ND ND2-Nitrophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND4-Nitrophenol ug/L 1 ND ND NDPentachlorophenol ug/L 1 ND ND NDPhenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L 0.4 ND ND ND2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Tables.xls Page 2 of 5

Table 4: Summary of Analytical Results PN 85989

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (CONTINUED)Sampling Date 9/26/2005 9/27/2005 9/29/2005

Units RDL PT-1 PT-2 PT-32,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND2,3,4-Trichlorophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND2,3,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND2,3,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND3,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDBenzyl butyl phthalate ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDBiphenyl ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDBis(2-chloroethyl)ether ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDBis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDBis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ug/L 2 ND ND ND4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L 0.3 ND ND NDp-Chloroaniline ug/L 1 ND ND ND4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDDiethyl phthalate ug/L 1 ND ND NDDimethyl phthalate ug/L 1 ND ND NDDi-N-butyl phthalate ug/L 2 ND ND NDDi-N-octyl phthalate ug/L 0.8 ND ND ND2,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND2,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDDiphenyl Ether ug/L 0.3 ND ND NDHexachlorobutadiene ug/L 0.4 ND ND NDHexachlorocyclopentadiene ug/L 2 ND ND NDHexachloroethane ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDIsophorone ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDNitrobenzene ug/L 0.5 ND ND NDNitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L 1 ND ND NDN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection Limit

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Tables.xls Page 3 of 5

Table 4: Summary of Analytical Results PN 85989

ATLANTIC MUST IN WATER - PIRI TIER ISampling Date 9/26/2005 9/27/2005 9/29/2005

Units RDL PT-1 PT-2 PT-3TPH COMPOUNDSBenzene mg/L 0.001 ND ND NDToluene mg/L 0.001 ND ND NDEthylbenzene mg/L 0.001 ND ND NDXylene (Total) mg/L 0.002 ND ND NDC6 - C10 (less BTEX) mg/L 0.01 ND ND ND>C10-C21 Hydrocarbons mg/L 0.06 ND ND ND>C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons mg/L 0.1 ND ND NDModified TPH (Tier1) mg/L 0.1 ND ND

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection Limit

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Tables.xls Page 4 of 5

Table 4: Summary of Analytical Results PN 85989

DISSOLVED METAL SCANSampling Date 9/26/2005 9/27/2005 9/29/2005 9/29/2005

Units RDL PT-1 PT-2 PT-3 TRIP BLANKAluminum (Al) ug/L 5 9 13 ND NDAntimony (Sb) ug/L 0.4 ND ND ND NDArsenic (As) ug/L 0.6 1 0.9 0.7 NDBarium (Ba) ug/L 0.4 25 27 29 NDBeryllium (Be) ug/L 0.5 ND ND ND NDBismuth (Bi) ug/L 2 ND ND ND NDBoron (B) ug/L 100 ND ND ND NDCadmium (Cd) ug/L 0.3 ND ND ND NDChromium (Cr) ug/L 1 ND ND ND NDCobalt (Co) ug/L 1 ND ND ND NDCopper (Cu) ug/L 2 2 ND ND 2Iron (Fe) ug/L 100 ND ND ND NDLead (Pb) ug/L 1 ND ND ND NDLithium (Li) ug/L 1 14 13 8 NDManganese (Mn) ug/L 4 97 120 130 NDMolybdenum (Mo) ug/L 4 ND ND ND NDNickel (Ni) ug/L 3 ND ND ND NDPhosphorus (P) ug/L 100 ND ND ND NDSelenium (Se) ug/L 1 ND ND ND NDSilver (Ag) ug/L 2 ND ND ND NDStrontium (Sr) ug/L 2 290 320 300 NDSulphur (S) ug/L 4000 11000 11000 11000 NDThallium (Tl) ug/L 0.8 ND ND ND NDTin (Sn) ug/L 20 ND ND ND NDTitanium (Ti) ug/L 3 ND ND ND NDUranium (U) ug/L 0.2 ND ND ND NDVanadium (V) ug/L 2 ND ND ND NDZinc (Zn) ug/L 2 ND 2 ND 8Calcium (Ca) mg/L 0.1 20 19 20 NDMagnesium (Mg) mg/L 0.1 2 2.1 2.4 0.1Potassium (K) mg/L 1 2 2 2 NDSilicon (Si) mg/L 0.5 4.8 4.8 5.4 NDSodium (Na) mg/L 1 50 52 69 NDTotal Mercury (Hg) ug/L 0.01 ND ND ND

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection Limit

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Tables.xls Page 5 of 5

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

Appendix A Water Level Graphs

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COBP-004MWA

11.705

11.71

11.715

11.72

11.725

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Shallow Bedrock176 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COBP-004MWB

11.4

11.41

11.42

11.43

11.44

11.45

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Shallow Bedrock175 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COBP-004MWC

12.7

12.72

12.74

12.76

12.78

12.8

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Intermediate Bedrock174 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COBP-005MWA

11.1

11.105

11.11

11.115

11.12

11.125

11.13

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Fill/Till157 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COBP-005MWB

11.7

11.725

11.75

11.775

11.8

11.825

11.85

11.875

11.9

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Shallow Bedrock158 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COBT-002MWA

12.1

12.125

12.15

12.175

12.2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Fill/Till176 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COBT-002MWB

11.2

11.225

11.25

11.275

11.3

11.325

11.35

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Shallow Bedrock175 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COBT-100MW

11.225

11.25

11.275

11.3

11.325

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Intermediate Bedrock180 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COCP-002MW

11.85

11.875

11.9

11.925

11.95

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Levels Graphs PN 85989

Shallow Bedrock135 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COCP-107MW

11.57

11.575

11.58

11.585

11.59

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Shallow Bedrock115 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

CODT-004MW

12

12.05

12.1

12.15

12.2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Shallow Bedrock107 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

CODT-005MWA

13.7

13.71

13.72

13.73

13.74

13.75

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Fill/Till65 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

CODT-005MWB

13

13.1

13.2

13.3

13.4

13.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Shallow Bedrock66 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

CODT-005MWC

12.1

12.15

12.2

12.25

12.3

12.35

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Intermediate Bedrock67 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

CODT-007MW

10.8

10.825

10.85

10.875

10.9

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Shallow Bedrock142 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

CODT-200MW

13

13.25

13.5

13.75

14

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Intermediate Bedrock19 m from CONPK-200PW

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

CONPK-200PW

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Intermediate Bedrock

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

CONPK-201MW

12.95

13

13.05

13.1

13.15

13.2

13.25

13.3

13.35

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Intermediate Bedrock42 m from CONPK-200PW

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COTS-001MWA

10.85

10.9

10.95

11

11.05

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Fill/Till78 m from CONPK-200PW

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COTS-001MWB

11.25

11.275

11.3

11.325

11.35

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Shallow Bedrock77 m from CONPK-200PW

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

PN-88-4A

11.65

11.675

11.7

11.725

11.75

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Shallow Bedrock112 m from CONPK-200PW

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

PN-88-4B

11.4

11.425

11.45

11.475

11.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Fill/Till112 m from CONPK-200PW

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

PN-88-5A

9.1

9.125

9.15

9.175

9.2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Shallow/Intermediate Bedrock174 m from CONPK-200PW

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

PN-88-5B

9.05

9.075

9.1

9.125

9.15

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Shallow Bedrock174 m from CONPK-200PW

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

PN-88-5C

9.4

9.425

9.45

9.475

9.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Fill/Till174 m from CONPK-200PW

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COB PIEZ 1

10.075

10.1

10.125

10.15

10.175

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Fill/Till136 m from CONPK-200PW

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

COB PIEZ 2

9.15

9.2

9.25

9.3

9.35

9.4

9.45

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Fill/Till135 m from CONPK-200PW

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix A.xls

WP PIEZ

10.55

10.575

10.6

10.625

10.65

10.675

10.7

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Elapsed Time (h)

Wat

er L

evel

(m a

sl)

Fill/Till70 m from CONPK-200PW

Appendix A: Water Level Graphs PN 85989

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

Appendix B Manual Data

6.6

6.7

6.8

6.9

7

7.1

7.2

7.3

7.4

9/26/2005 00:00 9/26/2005 12:00 9/27/2005 00:00 9/27/2005 12:00 9/28/2005 00:00 9/28/2005 12:00 9/29/2005 00:00 9/29/2005 12:00

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

Pumping Rate Measurements

Step-Drawdown Pumping Test

Date/Time Step Quantity (l) Time (s) Rate (l/min)

9/23/2005 12:18 1 11.25 300 2.259/23/2005 14:05 2 10 120 5.009/23/2005 14:50 3 15 39 23.089/23/2005 16:30 4 15 103 8.74

Long-Term, Constant-Rate Pumping Test

Date/Time Line Quantity (l) Time (s) Rate (l/min) Total Rate (l/min)

9/26/2005 11:33 1 1 14 4.299/26/2005 11:40 2 1 29 2.07 6.35

9/26/2005 11:34 1 15 182 4.959/26/2005 11:41 2 15 374 2.41 7.35

9/26/2005 15:39 1 15 187 4.819/26/2005 15:31 2 15 383 2.35 7.16

9/27/2005 01:48 1 15 196 4.599/27/2005 01:53 2 15 383 2.35 6.94

9/27/2005 08:30 1 15 204 4.419/27/2005 08:30 2 15 400 2.25 6.66

9/27/2005 11:30 1 15 198 4.559/27/2005 11:30 2 15 394 2.28 6.83

9/27/2005 17:45 1 15 197 4.579/27/2005 17:45 2 15 391 2.30 6.87

9/28/2005 08:15 1 15 199 4.529/28/2005 08:15 2 15 394 2.28 6.81

9/28/2005 17:30 1 15 200 4.509/28/2005 17:30 2 15 390 2.31 6.81

9/29/2005 08:15 1 15 196 4.599/29/2005 08:15 2 15 385 2.34 6.93

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of1

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COBP-004MWA Shallow Bedrock

easting 4602266.875 distance from CONPK-200PW 175.66 mnorthing 5113019.88 azimuth 225 degreesreference elevation 14.67 m asl

static water level 2.945 m btocstatic water level 11.725 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:00:00 2.95 11.722005/09/26 08:31:38 2.945 11.7252005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:20:50 2.958 11.712 1845 0.0132005/09/26 12:06:57 2.956 11.714 4612 0.0112005/09/26 12:24:17 2.957 11.713 5652 0.0122005/09/26 13:37:46 2.946 11.724 10061 0.001 different water level meter used2005/09/26 15:23:57 2.956 11.714 16432 0.0112005/09/26 17:03:03 2.957 11.713 22378 0.0122005/09/27 01:09:38 2.957 11.713 51573 0.0122005/09/27 07:59:10 2.953 11.717 76145 0.0082005/09/27 10:42:15 2.951 11.719 85930 0.0062005/09/27 14:17:40 2.951 11.719 98855 0.0062005/09/27 17:14:14 2.954 11.716 109449 0.0092005/09/28 07:53:50 2.958 11.712 162225 0.0132005/09/28 10:04:20 2.958 11.712 170055 0.0132005/09/28 16:10:54 2.96 11.71 192049 0.0152005/09/29 07:55:40 2.958 11.712 248735 0.0132005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 10:15:31 2.958 11.712 257126 0.0132005/09/29 12:27:30 2.952 11.718 265045 0.0072005/09/29 14:07:00 2.955 11.715 271015 0.01

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 1

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COBP-004MWB Shallow Bedrock

easting 4602266.147 distance from CONPK-200PW 175.43 mnorthing 5113019.495 azimuth 224 degreesreference elevation 14.67 m asl

static water level 3.244 m btocstatic water level 11.426 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:00:00 3.255 11.4152005/09/26 08:32:39 3.244 11.4262005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:22:15 3.255 11.415 1930 0.0112005/09/26 12:08:18 3.255 11.415 4693 0.0112005/09/26 12:23:50 3.255 11.415 5625 0.0112005/09/26 13:37:08 3.24 11.43 10023 -0.004 different water level meter used2005/09/26 15:26:07 3.256 11.414 16562 0.0122005/09/26 17:04:30 3.25 11.42 22465 0.0062005/09/27 01:10:29 3.249 11.421 51624 0.0052005/09/27 08:00:30 3.244 11.426 76225 02005/09/27 10:41:50 3.235 11.435 85905 -0.0092005/09/27 14:19:00 3.236 11.434 98935 -0.0082005/09/27 17:15:10 3.241 11.429 109505 -0.0032005/09/28 07:52:30 3.252 11.418 162145 0.0082005/09/28 10:03:20 3.254 11.416 169995 0.012005/09/28 16:13:07 3.252 11.418 192182 0.0082005/09/29 07:56:10 3.249 11.421 248765 0.0052005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 10:18:53 3.248 11.422 257328 0.0042005/09/29 12:28:00 3.245 11.425 265075 0.0012005/09/29 14:06:30 3.241 11.429 270985 -0.003

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 1

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COBP-004MWC Intermediate Bedrock

easting 4602263.933 distance from CONPK-200PW 174.15 mnorthing 5113019.135 azimuth 136 degreesreference elevation 14.65 m asl

static water level 1.924 m btocstatic water level 12.726 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:00:00 1.913 12.7372005/09/26 08:33:26 1.924 12.7262005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:23:45 1.935 12.715 2020 0.0112005/09/26 12:09:55 1.926 12.724 4790 0.0022005/09/26 12:21:25 1.925 12.725 5480 0.0012005/09/26 13:36:18 1.905 12.745 9973 -0.019 different water level meter used2005/09/26 15:27:55 1.919 12.731 16670 -0.0052005/09/26 17:06:00 1.915 12.735 22555 -0.0092005/09/27 01:11:37 1.915 12.735 51692 -0.0092005/09/27 08:02:30 1.916 12.734 76345 -0.0082005/09/27 10:39:30 1.895 12.755 85765 -0.0292005/09/27 14:19:50 1.875 12.775 98985 -0.0492005/09/27 17:16:16 1.882 12.768 109571 -0.0422005/09/28 07:51:30 1.929 12.721 162085 0.0052005/09/28 10:02:40 1.93 12.72 169955 0.0062005/09/28 16:14:35 1.89 12.76 192270 -0.0342005/09/29 07:57:10 1.918 12.732 248825 -0.0062005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 10:20:04 1.92 12.73 257399 -0.0042005/09/29 12:28:30 1.917 12.733 265105 -0.0072005/09/29 14:06:00 1.913 12.737 270955 -0.011

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 1

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COBP-005MWA Fill/Till

easting 4602292.929 distance from CONPK-200PW 157.39 mnorthing 5113095.342 azimuth 108 degreesreference elevation 12.93 m asl

static water level 1.816 m btocstatic water level 11.114 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:00:00 1.805 11.1252005/09/26 08:28:20 1.816 11.1142005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 10:55:39 1.821 11.109 334 0.0052005/09/26 11:15:58 1.82 11.11 1553 0.0042005/09/26 11:53:25 1.821 11.109 3800 0.0052005/09/26 12:03:40 1.821 11.109 4415 0.0052005/09/26 12:26:10 1.818 11.112 5765 0.0022005/09/26 13:40:59 1.805 11.125 10254 -0.011 different water level meter used2005/09/26 15:19:37 1.813 11.117 16172 -0.0032005/09/26 16:59:25 1.809 11.121 22160 -0.0072005/09/27 01:06:25 1.817 11.113 51380 0.0012005/09/27 08:04:10 1.817 11.113 76445 0.0012005/09/27 10:45:10 1.818 11.112 86105 0.0022005/09/27 14:14:22 1.813 11.117 98657 -0.0032005/09/27 17:11:28 1.815 11.115 109283 -0.0012005/09/28 07:56:50 1.824 11.106 162405 0.0082005/09/28 10:07:10 1.824 11.106 170225 0.0082005/09/28 16:07:39 1.825 11.105 191854 0.0092005/09/29 07:52:30 1.826 11.104 248545 0.012005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 10:10:00 1.827 11.103 256795 0.0112005/09/29 12:31:45 1.809 11.121 265300 -0.0072005/09/29 14:09:30 1.805 11.125 271165 -0.011

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 1

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COBP-005MWB Shallow Bedrock

easting 4602293.445 distance from CONPK-200PW 158.29 mnorthing 5113094.063 azimuth 109 degreesreference elevation 12.97 m asl

static water level 1.217 m btocstatic water level 11.753 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 10:00:00 1.215 11.7552005/09/26 08:29:16 1.217 11.7532005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 10:57:50 1.209 11.761 465 -0.0082005/09/26 11:17:20 1.206 11.764 1635 -0.0112005/09/26 11:54:30 1.192 11.778 3865 -0.0252005/09/26 12:04:28 1.194 11.776 4463 -0.0232005/09/26 12:27:19 1.196 11.774 5834 -0.0212005/09/26 13:40:15 1.176 11.794 10210 -0.041 different water level meter used2005/09/26 15:21:17 1.181 11.789 16272 -0.0362005/09/26 17:00:40 1.163 11.807 22235 -0.0542005/09/27 01:07:08 1.218 11.752 51423 0.0012005/09/27 08:05:30 1.229 11.741 76525 0.0122005/09/27 10:44:50 1.228 11.742 86085 0.0112005/09/27 14:15:25 1.184 11.786 98720 -0.0332005/09/27 17:12:18 1.185 11.785 109333 -0.0322005/09/28 07:57:50 1.212 11.758 162465 -0.0052005/09/28 10:06:30 1.211 11.759 170185 -0.0062005/09/28 16:09:00 1.216 11.754 191935 -0.0012005/09/29 07:53:00 1.22 11.75 248575 0.0032005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 10:11:08 1.218 11.752 256863 0.0012005/09/29 12:31:00 1.153 11.817 265255 -0.0642005/09/29 14:09:10 1.109 11.861 271145 -0.108

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 1

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COBT-002MWA Fill/Till

easting 4602210.864 distance from CONPK-200PW 176.41 mnorthing 5112981.917 azimuth 158 degreesreference elevation 16.46 m asl

static water level 4.312 m btocstatic water level 12.148 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:00:00 4.368 12.0922005/09/26 08:40:34 4.312 12.1482005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:29:26 4.32 12.14 2361 0.0082005/09/26 12:15:02 4.319 12.141 5097 0.0072005/09/26 13:32:20 4.304 12.156 9735 -0.008 different water level meter used2005/09/26 15:31:18 4.315 12.145 16873 0.0032005/09/26 17:09:12 4.311 12.149 22747 -0.0012005/09/27 01:14:27 4.303 12.157 51862 -0.0092005/09/27 07:55:30 4.289 12.171 75925 -0.0232005/09/27 10:36:30 4.278 12.182 85585 -0.0342005/09/27 14:22:20 4.279 12.181 99135 -0.0332005/09/27 17:18:37 4.308 12.152 109712 -0.0042005/09/28 07:48:10 4.343 12.117 161885 0.0312005/09/28 10:00:00 4.334 12.126 169795 0.0222005/09/28 16:17:07 4.348 12.112 192422 0.0362005/09/29 08:01:30 4.334 12.126 249085 0.0222005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 10:23:19 4.332 12.128 257594 0.022005/09/29 12:24:30 4.321 12.139 264865 0.0092005/09/29 14:02:00 4.314 12.146 270715 0.002

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 1

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COBT-002MWB Shallow Bedrock

easting 4602206.96 distance from CONPK-200PW 174.69 mnorthing 5112982.204 azimuth 159 degreesreference elevation 16.41 m asl

static water level 5.119 m btocstatic water level 11.291 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:00:00 5.113 11.2972005/09/26 08:39:51 5.119 11.2912005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:31:14 5.125 11.285 2469 0.0062005/09/26 12:16:46 5.122 11.288 5201 0.0032005/09/26 13:31:35 5.112 11.298 9690 -0.007 different water level meter used2005/09/26 15:33:40 5.121 11.289 17015 0.0022005/09/26 17:10:55 5.12 11.29 22850 0.0012005/09/27 01:15:33 5.126 11.284 51928 0.0072005/09/27 07:56:10 5.124 11.286 75965 0.0052005/09/27 10:35:40 5.12 11.29 85535 0.0012005/09/27 14:23:40 5.11 11.3 99215 -0.0092005/09/27 17:20:45 5.117 11.293 109840 -0.0022005/09/28 07:47:30 5.152 11.258 161845 0.0332005/09/28 09:59:10 5.154 11.256 169745 0.0352005/09/28 16:19:19 5.156 11.254 192554 0.0372005/09/29 08:00:50 5.165 11.245 249045 0.0462005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 10:24:27 5.163 11.247 257662 0.0442005/09/29 12:24:00 5.157 11.253 264835 0.0382005/09/29 14:02:30 5.152 11.258 270745 0.033

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 1

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COBT-100MW Intermediate Bedrock

easting 4602199.963 distance from CONPK-200PW 180.07 mnorthing 5112973.981 azimuth 162 degreesreference elevation 16.18 m asl

static water level 4.878 m btocstatic water level 11.302 m asl

Hydraulic Conductivity CalculationsTheis Jacob Straight Line W(u) match 1 Drawdown 0.0335 m 1/u match 1 Time 10400 s Drawdown 0.23 m T 6.26E-04 m2/s Time 26500 s K 6.26E-05 m/s T 3.96E-05 m2/s S 4.51E-04 K 3.96E-06 m/s S 1.30E-04

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:00:00 4.883 11.2972005/09/26 08:38:48 4.878 11.3022005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:27:28 4.89 11.29 2243 0.0122005/09/26 12:13:10 4.888 11.292 4985 0.012005/09/26 13:33:28 4.87 11.31 9803 -0.008 different water level meter used2005/09/26 15:35:10 4.887 11.293 17105 0.0092005/09/26 17:12:20 4.882 11.298 22935 0.0042005/09/27 01:16:53 4.89 11.29 52008 0.0122005/09/27 07:53:10 4.888 11.292 75785 0.012005/09/27 10:34:00 4.884 11.296 85435 0.0062005/09/27 14:24:50 4.871 11.309 99285 -0.0072005/09/27 17:21:02 4.877 11.303 109857 -0.0012005/09/28 07:45:30 4.907 11.273 161725 0.029

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COBT-100MW Intermediate Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/28 09:57:40 4.914 11.266 169655 0.0362005/09/28 16:20:35 4.914 11.266 192630 0.0362005/09/29 07:59:30 4.924 11.256 248965 0.0462005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 10:28:00 4.925 11.255 257875 0.0472005/09/29 12:23:00 4.92 11.26 264775 0.0422005/09/29 14:04:00 4.915 11.265 270835 0.037

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COCP-107MW Shallow Bedrock

easting 4602249.219 distance from CONPK-200PW 115.03 mnorthing 5113099.495 azimuth 113 degreesreference elevation 13.09 m asl

static water level 1.502 m btocstatic water level 11.588 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 13:00:00 1.498 11.5922005/09/26 08:22:21 1.502 11.5882005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 10:52:30 1.517 11.573 145 0.0152005/09/26 11:02:22 1.518 11.572 737 0.0162005/09/26 11:13:32 1.519 11.571 1407 0.0172005/09/26 11:51:03 1.515 11.575 3658 0.0132005/09/26 11:59:40 1.515 11.575 4175 0.0132005/09/26 13:44:12 1.504 11.586 10447 0.002 different water level meter used2005/09/26 15:17:26 1.515 11.575 16041 0.0132005/09/26 16:45:18 1.513 11.577 21313 0.0112005/09/27 01:04:27 1.514 11.576 51262 0.0122005/09/27 08:09:30 1.512 11.578 76765 0.012005/09/27 10:49:10 1.514 11.576 86345 0.0122005/09/27 14:12:26 1.512 11.578 98541 0.012005/09/27 15:09:09 1.514 11.576 101944 0.0122005/09/28 08:01:35 1.515 11.575 162690 0.0132005/09/28 10:10:50 1.515 11.575 170445 0.0132005/09/28 16:05:40 1.515 11.575 191735 0.0132005/09/29 07:49:00 1.517 11.573 248335 0.0152005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 10:01:40 1.518 11.572 256295 0.0162005/09/29 11:51:40 1.517 11.573 262895 0.0152005/09/29 12:36:10 1.515 11.575 265565 0.0132005/09/29 14:12:30 1.515 11.575 271345 0.013

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 1

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CODT-004MW Shallow Bedrock

easting 4602037.07 distance from CONPK-200PW 106.82 mnorthing 5113136.67 azimuth 266 degreesreference elevation 13.6 m asl

static water level 1.436 m btocstatic water level 12.164 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:00:00 1.423 12.1772005/09/26 07:55:12 1.436 12.1642005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 10:55:40 1.453 12.147 335 0.0172005/09/26 11:28:20 1.452 12.148 2295 0.0162005/09/26 12:04:10 1.452 12.148 4445 0.0162005/09/26 12:46:00 1.452 12.148 6955 0.0162005/09/26 13:11:25 1.453 12.147 8480 0.0172005/09/26 15:12:10 1.454 12.146 15725 0.0182005/09/26 16:26:00 1.458 12.142 20155 0.0222005/09/27 00:30:53 1.467 12.133 49248 0.0312005/09/27 07:23:30 1.473 12.127 74005 0.0372005/09/27 09:46:15 1.472 12.128 82570 0.0362005/09/27 14:40:25 1.473 12.127 100220 0.0372005/09/27 18:01:50 1.484 12.116 112305 0.0482005/09/28 07:15:00 1.5 12.1 159895 0.0642005/09/28 09:34:05 1.513 12.087 168240 0.0772005/09/28 16:54:09 1.509 12.091 194644 0.0732005/09/29 07:26:30 1.518 12.082 246985 0.0822005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:19:30 1.519 12.081 253765 0.0832005/09/29 09:31:30 1.519 12.081 254485 0.0832005/09/29 10:06:10 1.518 12.082 256565 0.0822005/09/29 10:47:30 1.515 12.085 259045 0.079

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CODT-004MW Shallow Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/29 11:29:20 1.514 12.086 261555 0.0782005/09/29 12:01:10 1.513 12.087 263465 0.0772005/09/29 12:40:07 1.514 12.086 265802 0.0782005/09/29 13:35:50 1.511 12.089 269145 0.075

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CODT-005MWA Fill/Till

easting 4602086.017 distance from CONPK-200PW 64.96 mnorthing 5113175.118 azimuth 298 degreesreference elevation 15.72 m asl

static water level 1.985 m btocstatic water level 13.735 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 13:00:00 2.135 13.5852005/09/26 07:51:20 1.985 13.7352005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 10:53:15 1.983 13.737 190 -0.0022005/09/26 11:06:40 1.984 13.736 995 -0.0012005/09/26 11:25:35 1.984 13.736 2130 -0.0012005/09/26 11:40:05 1.981 13.739 3000 -0.0042005/09/26 12:01:40 1.983 13.737 4295 -0.0022005/09/26 12:16:40 1.985 13.735 5195 02005/09/26 12:44:15 1.981 13.739 6850 -0.0042005/09/26 13:09:42 1.983 13.737 8377 -0.0022005/09/26 15:10:35 1.983 13.737 15630 -0.0022005/09/26 16:24:20 1.983 13.737 20055 -0.0022005/09/27 00:28:59 1.982 13.738 49134 -0.0032005/09/27 07:21:40 1.985 13.735 73895 02005/09/27 09:44:55 1.984 13.736 82490 -0.0012005/09/27 14:36:14 1.982 13.738 99969 -0.0032005/09/27 18:10:15 1.985 13.735 112810 02005/09/28 07:12:55 1.987 13.733 159770 0.0022005/09/28 09:32:10 2.001 13.719 168125 0.0162005/09/28 16:49:25 1.994 13.726 194360 0.0092005/09/29 07:25:15 1.999 13.721 246910 0.0142005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:06:20 1.998 13.722 252975 0.013

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CODT-005MWA Fill/Till

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/29 09:17:20 1.999 13.721 253635 0.0142005/09/29 09:42:00 1.999 13.721 255115 0.0142005/09/29 10:03:30 1.999 13.721 256405 0.0142005/09/29 10:44:05 1.998 13.722 258840 0.0132005/09/29 11:36:05 1.996 13.724 261960 0.0112005/09/29 12:08:15 1.996 13.724 263890 0.0112005/09/29 12:37:26 1.995 13.725 265641 0.012005/09/29 13:31:00 1.999 13.721 268855 0.014

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CODT-005MWB Shallow Bedrock

easting 4602085.342 distance from CONPK-200PW 66.08 mnorthing 5113176.237 azimuth 298 degreesreference elevation 15.46 m asl

static water level 2.017 m btocstatic water level 13.443 m asl

Hydraulic Conductivity CalculationsTheis Jacob Straight Line W(u) match 1 Drawdown 0.238 m 1/u match 1 Time 990 s Drawdown 0.13 m T 8.81E-05 m2/s Time 1000 s K 8.81E-06 m/s T 7.01E-05 m2/s S 4.49E-05 K 7.01E-06 m/s S 6.42E-05

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 13:00:00 1.985 13.4752005/09/26 07:52:00 2.017 13.4432005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 10:52:30 2.021 13.439 145 0.0042005/09/26 11:05:45 2.046 13.414 940 0.0292005/09/26 11:24:15 2.1 13.36 2050 0.0832005/09/26 11:38:50 2.132 13.328 2925 0.1152005/09/26 12:00:15 2.169 13.291 4210 0.1522005/09/26 12:15:10 2.186 13.274 5105 0.1692005/09/26 12:43:05 2.216 13.244 6780 0.1992005/09/26 12:53:15 2.226 13.234 7390 0.2092005/09/26 13:08:59 2.24 13.22 8334 0.2232005/09/26 13:17:39 2.246 13.214 8854 0.2292005/09/26 13:57:50 2.27 13.19 11265 0.2532005/09/26 15:09:20 2.296 13.164 15555 0.2792005/09/26 15:19:40 2.301 13.159 16175 0.284

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 3

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CODT-005MWB Shallow Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/26 16:22:45 2.32 13.14 19960 0.3032005/09/26 16:34:57 2.321 13.139 20692 0.3042005/09/27 00:28:19 2.367 13.093 49094 0.352005/09/27 07:20:30 2.389 13.071 73825 0.3722005/09/27 09:44:15 2.387 13.073 82450 0.372005/09/27 10:02:30 2.385 13.075 83545 0.3682005/09/27 14:37:43 2.387 13.073 100058 0.372005/09/27 18:09:05 2.398 13.062 112740 0.3812005/09/28 07:12:00 2.416 13.044 159715 0.3992005/09/28 09:31:15 2.425 13.035 168070 0.4082005/09/28 16:50:30 2.422 13.038 194425 0.4052005/09/29 07:46:20 2.433 13.027 248175 0.416 difficult to read field record2005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:05:10 2.431 13.029 252905 0.4142005/09/29 09:09:00 2.43 13.03 253135 0.4132005/09/29 09:11:20 2.43 13.03 253275 0.4132005/09/29 09:14:10 2.428 13.032 253445 0.4112005/09/29 09:18:00 2.425 13.035 253675 0.4082005/09/29 09:25:00 2.416 13.044 254095 0.3992005/09/29 09:30:00 2.408 13.052 254395 0.3912005/09/29 09:40:00 2.39 13.07 254995 0.3732005/09/29 09:45:00 2.379 13.081 255295 0.3622005/09/29 10:01:00 2.345 13.115 256255 0.3282005/09/29 10:05:00 2.338 13.122 256495 0.3212005/09/29 10:13:00 2.322 13.138 256975 0.3052005/09/29 10:18:00 2.312 13.148 257275 0.2952005/09/29 10:23:00 2.303 13.157 257575 0.2862005/09/29 10:39:00 2.277 13.183 258535 0.262005/09/29 10:42:00 2.273 13.187 258715 0.2562005/09/29 10:46:00 2.268 13.192 258955 0.2512005/09/29 10:54:00 2.257 13.203 259435 0.242005/09/29 10:57:00 2.254 13.206 259615 0.237

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 3

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CODT-005MWB Shallow Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/29 11:02:00 2.247 13.213 259915 0.232005/09/29 11:15:00 2.235 13.225 260695 0.2182005/09/29 11:21:00 2.23 13.23 261055 0.2132005/09/29 11:28:00 2.224 13.236 261475 0.2072005/09/29 11:37:00 2.215 13.245 262015 0.1982005/09/29 12:00:00 2.199 13.261 263395 0.1822005/09/29 12:06:00 2.196 13.264 263755 0.1792005/09/29 12:10:00 2.194 13.266 263995 0.1772005/09/29 12:36:37 2.18 13.28 265592 0.1632005/09/29 12:46:16 2.175 13.285 266171 0.1582005/09/29 13:32:00 2.162 13.298 268915 0.1452005/09/29 13:42:00 2.157 13.303 269515 0.142005/09/29 14:23:30 2.14 13.32 272005 0.123

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 3 of 3

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CODT-005MWC Intermediate Bedrock

easting 4602085.927 distance from CONPK-200PW 66.59 mnorthing 5113178.337 azimuth 300 degreesreference elevation 15.62 m asl

static water level 3.327 m btocstatic water level 12.293 m asl

Hydraulic Conductivity CalculationsTheis Jacob Straight Line W(u) match 1 Drawdown 0.138 m 1/u match 1 Time 11600 s Drawdown 0.035 m T 1.52E-04 m2/s Time 9000 s K 1.52E-05 m/s T 2.60E-04 m2/s S 8.94E-04 K 2.60E-05 m/s S 2.11E-03

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 13:00:00 3.312 12.3082005/09/26 07:52:45 3.327 12.2932005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 10:51:20 3.329 12.291 75 0.0022005/09/26 11:04:30 3.326 12.294 865 -0.0012005/09/26 11:22:30 3.326 12.294 1945 -0.0012005/09/26 11:37:10 3.326 12.294 2825 -0.0012005/09/26 11:59:00 3.329 12.291 4135 0.0022005/09/26 12:13:20 3.33 12.29 4995 0.0032005/09/26 12:41:45 3.332 12.288 6700 0.0052005/09/26 13:08:29 3.336 12.284 8304 0.0092005/09/26 15:07:55 3.35 12.27 15470 0.0232005/09/26 16:20:45 3.356 12.264 19840 0.0292005/09/27 00:27:18 3.392 12.228 49033 0.0652005/09/27 07:19:05 3.413 12.207 73740 0.0862005/09/27 09:43:45 3.412 12.208 82420 0.085

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CODT-005MWC Intermediate Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/27 14:38:41 3.409 12.211 100116 0.0822005/09/27 18:08:10 3.419 12.201 112685 0.0922005/09/28 07:08:00 3.453 12.167 159475 0.1262005/09/28 09:30:20 3.469 12.151 168015 0.1422005/09/28 16:15:46 3.467 12.153 192341 0.142005/09/29 07:23:40 3.488 12.132 246815 0.161 measurement is suspect2005/09/29 09:04:50 3.472 12.148 252885 0.1452005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:16:00 3.489 12.131 253555 0.1622005/09/29 09:41:10 3.489 12.131 255065 0.1622005/09/29 10:02:45 3.489 12.131 256360 0.1622005/09/29 10:43:16 3.486 12.134 258791 0.1592005/09/29 11:35:15 3.476 12.144 261910 0.1492005/09/29 12:07:35 3.471 12.149 263850 0.1442005/09/29 12:38:10 3.466 12.154 265685 0.1392005/09/29 13:30:15 3.457 12.163 268810 0.13

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CODT-007MW Shallow Bedrock

easting 4602039.433 distance from CONPK-200PW 142.27 mnorthing 5113048.063 azimuth 227 degreesreference elevation 12.26 m asl

static water level 1.398 m btocstatic water level 10.862 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 13:00:00 1.388 10.8722005/09/26 08:00:09 1.398 10.8622005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:01:10 1.402 10.858 665 0.0042005/09/26 11:34:40 1.403 10.857 2675 0.0052005/09/26 12:09:20 1.403 10.857 4755 0.0052005/09/26 12:50:20 1.403 10.857 7215 0.0052005/09/26 13:15:09 1.403 10.857 8704 0.0052005/09/26 15:16:40 1.402 10.858 15995 0.0042005/09/26 16:31:42 1.406 10.854 20497 0.0082005/09/27 00:35:43 1.41 10.85 49538 0.0122005/09/27 07:27:10 1.412 10.848 74225 0.0142005/09/27 14:44:25 1.411 10.849 100460 0.0132005/09/27 18:05:20 1.432 10.828 112515 0.0342005/09/28 07:19:30 1.443 10.817 160165 0.0452005/09/28 07:37:30 1.454 10.806 161245 0.056 used interface probe2005/09/28 17:00:00 1.451 10.809 194995 0.0532005/09/29 07:29:50 1.448 10.812 247185 0.052005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:22:10 1.452 10.808 253925 0.0542005/09/29 09:36:10 1.448 10.812 254765 0.052005/09/29 10:09:30 1.447 10.813 256765 0.0492005/09/29 10:52:00 1.445 10.815 259315 0.0472005/09/29 11:32:30 1.443 10.817 261745 0.045

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CODT-007MW Shallow Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/29 12:04:05 1.439 10.821 263640 0.0412005/09/29 12:44:00 1.44 10.82 266035 0.0422005/09/29 13:39:30 1.436 10.824 269365 0.038

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CODT-200MW Intermediate Bedrock

easting 4602124.92 distance from CONPK-200PW 19.04 mnorthing 5113141.16 azimuth 258 degreesreference elevation 14.78 m asl

static water level 0.835 m btocstatic water level 13.945 m asl

Hydraulic Conductivity CalculationsTheis Jacob Straight Line W(u) match 1 Drawdown 0.355 m 1/u match 1 Time 67 s Drawdown 0.17 m T 5.90E-05 m2/s Time 62 s K 5.90E-06 m/s T 5.36E-05 m2/s S 2.46E-05 K 5.36E-06 m/s S 3.67E-05

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/22 18:00:00 1.123 13.6572005/09/23 11:06:00 1.028 13.7522005/09/23 11:29:20 1.027 13.7532005/09/23 11:38:00 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 2.25 l/min2005/09/23 12:00:53 1.098 13.6822005/09/23 13:19:00 pumping rate changed to 5 l/min2005/09/23 14:11:18 1.314 13.4662005/09/23 14:27:00 pumping rate changed to 23 l/min2005/09/23 14:56:08 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/24 17:56:10 0.81 13.972005/09/26 08:53:50 0.835 13.9452005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:02:30 1.194 13.586 745 0.3592005/09/26 11:15:44 1.319 13.461 1539 0.4842005/09/26 11:27:59 1.377 13.403 2274 0.5422005/09/26 11:55:35 1.463 13.317 3930 0.628

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CODT-200MW Intermediate Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/26 13:48:00 1.605 13.175 10675 0.772005/09/26 16:03:19 1.655 13.125 18794 0.822005/09/26 17:27:30 1.671 13.109 23845 0.8362005/09/27 01:28:07 1.712 13.068 52682 0.8772005/09/27 07:39:30 1.719 13.061 74965 0.8842005/09/27 10:21:00 1.715 13.065 84655 0.882005/09/27 14:52:46 1.712 13.068 100961 0.8772005/09/27 17:28:13 1.722 13.058 110288 0.8872005/09/28 07:29:05 1.731 13.049 160740 0.8962005/09/28 09:44:35 1.733 13.047 168870 0.8982005/09/28 16:28:56 1.733 13.047 193131 0.8982005/09/29 07:38:30 1.735 13.045 247705 0.92005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:09:55 1.715 13.065 253190 0.882005/09/29 09:35:33 1.482 13.298 254728 0.6472005/09/29 09:44:20 1.403 13.377 255255 0.5682005/09/29 09:50:20 1.353 13.427 255615 0.5182005/09/29 10:39:42 1.112 13.668 258577 0.2772005/09/29 11:03:51 1.07 13.71 260026 0.2352005/09/29 11:43:30 1.029 13.751 262405 0.1942005/09/29 13:21:29 0.999 13.781 268284 0.164

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CONPK-200PW Intermediate Bedrock

easting 4602143.57northing 5113144.99reference elevation 15.13 m asl

static water level 1.066 m btocstatic water level 14.064 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/22 18:00:00 0.84 14.292005/09/23 10:40:00 0.828 14.302 changed cable and lowered transducer2005/09/23 11:27:30 0.828 14.3022005/09/23 11:33:06 0.828 14.3022005/09/23 11:38:00 pump started at 2.25 l/min2005/09/23 11:38:07 0.84 14.29 0.0122005/09/23 11:38:11 0.878 14.252 0.052005/09/23 11:38:19 0.898 14.232 0.072005/09/23 11:38:38 0.9 14.23 0.0722005/09/23 11:38:53 0.923 14.207 0.0952005/09/23 11:39:06 0.932 14.198 0.1042005/09/23 11:39:21 0.941 14.189 0.1132005/09/23 11:39:43 0.943 14.187 0.1152005/09/23 11:40:07 0.969 14.161 0.1412005/09/23 11:40:26 0.982 14.148 0.1542005/09/23 11:40:59 0.997 14.133 0.1692005/09/23 11:41:20 1.007 14.123 0.1792005/09/23 11:42:14 1.035 14.095 0.2072005/09/23 11:43:19 1.064 14.066 0.2362005/09/23 11:44:18 1.088 14.042 0.262005/09/23 11:45:25 1.109 14.021 0.2812005/09/23 11:46:19 1.128 14.002 0.32005/09/23 11:47:19 1.144 13.986 0.3162005/09/23 11:48:20 1.159 13.971 0.3312005/09/23 11:50:17 1.183 13.947 0.3552005/09/23 11:52:25 1.207 13.923 0.379

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 5

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CONPK-200PW Intermediate Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/23 11:54:48 1.228 13.902 0.42005/09/23 11:58:01 1.253 13.877 0.4252005/09/23 11:59:59 1.266 13.864 0.4382005/09/23 12:07:09 1.296 13.834 0.4682005/09/23 12:24:51 1.339 13.791 0.5112005/09/23 12:47:00 1.366 13.764 0.5382005/09/23 13:18:23 1.384 13.746 0.5562005/09/23 13:19:00 pumping rate changed to 5 l/min2005/09/23 13:19:09 1.392 13.738 0.5642005/09/23 13:19:23 1.413 13.717 0.5852005/09/23 13:19:34 1.424 13.706 0.5962005/09/23 13:19:51 1.445 13.685 0.6172005/09/23 13:20:14 1.467 13.663 0.6392005/09/23 13:20:41 1.493 13.637 0.6652005/09/23 13:21:17 1.525 13.605 0.6972005/09/23 13:21:56 1.554 13.576 0.7262005/09/23 13:24:19 1.652 13.478 0.8242005/09/23 13:26:41 1.721 13.409 0.8932005/09/23 13:31:13 1.812 13.318 0.9842005/09/23 13:40:04 1.917 13.213 1.0892005/09/23 13:58:49 1.998 13.132 1.172005/09/23 14:16:42 2.004 13.126 1.1762005/09/23 14:25:55 2.034 13.096 1.2062005/09/23 14:27:00 pumping rate changed to 23 l/min2005/09/23 14:27:08 2.1 13.03 1.2722005/09/23 14:27:29 2.25 12.88 1.4222005/09/23 14:27:40 2.35 12.78 1.5222005/09/23 14:27:47 2.4 12.73 1.5722005/09/23 14:27:53 2.45 12.68 1.6222005/09/23 14:28:00 2.5 12.63 1.6722005/09/23 14:28:13 2.6 12.53 1.7722005/09/23 14:28:27 2.7 12.43 1.8722005/09/23 14:28:41 2.8 12.33 1.972

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 5

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CONPK-200PW Intermediate Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/23 14:28:55 2.9 12.23 2.0722005/09/23 14:29:13 3 12.13 2.1722005/09/23 14:29:39 3.2 11.93 2.3722005/09/23 14:30:07 3.4 11.73 2.5722005/09/23 14:30:29 3.55 11.58 2.7222005/09/23 14:31:39 4.05 11.08 3.2222005/09/23 14:32:06 4.25 10.88 3.4222005/09/23 14:45:04 9.88 5.25 9.0522005/09/23 14:49:42 11.98 3.15 11.1522005/09/23 14:54:42 14.116 1.014 13.2882005/09/23 14:56:08 water level intercepted pump2005/09/23 16:10:00 5.656 9.474 4.828 pump started at 8.75 l/min2005/09/23 16:10:18 5.66 9.47 4.8322005/09/23 16:10:40 5.75 9.38 4.9222005/09/23 16:10:57 5.8 9.33 4.9722005/09/23 16:11:09 5.83 9.3 5.0022005/09/23 16:11:18 5.85 9.28 5.0222005/09/23 16:11:26 5.87 9.26 5.0422005/09/23 16:11:37 5.9 9.23 5.0722005/09/23 16:11:45 5.92 9.21 5.0922005/09/23 16:11:56 5.95 9.18 5.1222005/09/23 16:12:26 6 9.13 5.1722005/09/23 16:12:56 6.1 9.03 5.2722005/09/23 16:13:37 6.2 8.93 5.3722005/09/23 16:14:18 6.3 8.83 5.4722005/09/23 16:15:00 6.4 8.73 5.5722005/09/23 16:15:21 6.45 8.68 5.6222005/09/23 16:20:09 7.09 8.04 6.2622005/09/23 16:22:32 7.398 7.732 6.572005/09/23 16:29:22 8.234 6.896 7.4062005/09/23 16:43:14 9.821 5.309 8.9932005/09/23 16:56:59 11.267 3.863 10.4392005/09/23 17:08:06 12.243 2.887 11.415

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 3 of 5

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CONPK-200PW Intermediate Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/23 17:25:38 13.482 1.648 12.6542005/09/23 17:28:40 pump stopped2005/09/24 17:58:15 1.057 14.0732005/09/26 09:05:10 1.059 14.0712005/09/26 10:48:00 1.066 14.0642005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started at 7 l/min2005/09/26 10:50:28 1.17 13.96 23 0.1042005/09/26 10:50:49 1.23 13.9 44 0.1642005/09/26 10:51:09 1.27 13.86 64 0.2042005/09/26 10:51:40 1.35 13.78 95 0.2842005/09/26 10:52:02 1.4 13.73 117 0.3342005/09/26 10:52:27 1.45 13.68 142 0.3842005/09/26 10:52:51 1.5 13.63 166 0.4342005/09/26 10:53:47 1.6 13.53 222 0.5342005/09/26 10:54:17 1.65 13.48 252 0.5842005/09/26 10:54:48 1.7 13.43 283 0.6342005/09/26 10:55:21 1.75 13.38 316 0.6842005/09/26 10:55:55 1.8 13.33 350 0.7342005/09/26 10:57:08 1.9 13.23 423 0.8342005/09/26 11:06:21 2.45 12.68 976 1.3842005/09/26 11:12:39 2.72 12.41 1354 1.6542005/09/26 11:13:19 2.75 12.38 1394 1.6842005/09/26 11:30:00 3.32 11.81 2395 2.2542005/09/26 11:49:30 3.811 11.319 3565 2.7452005/09/26 12:08:15 4.194 10.936 4690 3.1282005/09/26 12:20:28 4.413 10.717 5423 3.3472005/09/26 12:54:56 4.872 10.258 7491 3.8062005/09/26 13:50:10 5.307 9.823 10805 4.2412005/09/26 15:04:24 5.741 9.389 15259 4.6752005/09/26 15:56:01 5.951 9.179 18356 4.8852005/09/26 17:25:48 6.176 8.954 23743 5.112005/09/27 01:26:21 6.759 8.371 52576 5.6932005/09/27 07:37:30 6.788 8.342 74845 5.722

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 4 of 5

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CONPK-200PW Intermediate Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/27 10:15:10 6.813 8.317 84305 5.7472005/09/27 14:49:57 6.86 8.27 100792 5.7942005/09/27 17:27:27 6.87 8.26 110242 5.8042005/09/28 07:27:10 6.905 8.225 160625 5.8392005/09/28 09:43:15 6.902 8.228 168790 5.8362005/09/28 16:26:56 6.92 8.21 193011 5.8542005/09/29 07:37:10 6.859 8.271 247625 5.7932005/09/29 09:03:47 6.875 8.255 252822 5.8092005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped2005/09/29 09:05:51 6.73 8.4 252946 5.6642005/09/29 09:07:11 6.52 8.61 253026 5.4542005/09/29 09:07:47 6.42 8.71 253062 5.3542005/09/29 09:08:09 6.36 8.77 253084 5.2942005/09/29 09:08:31 6.3 8.83 253106 5.2342005/09/29 09:33:36 3.24 11.89 254611 2.1742005/09/29 09:42:30 2.585 12.545 255145 1.5192005/09/29 09:48:46 2.24 12.89 255521 1.1742005/09/29 10:33:27 1.395 13.735 258202 0.3292005/09/29 11:02:37 1.317 13.813 259952 0.2512005/09/29 11:41:40 1.269 13.861 262295 0.2032005/09/29 13:02:27 1.21 13.92 267142 0.144

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 5 of 5

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CONPK-201MW Intermediate Bedrock

easting 4602171.39 distance from CONPK-200PW 41.98 mnorthing 5113113.55 azimuth 139 degreesreference elevation 14.8 m asl

static water level 1.495 m btocstatic water level 13.305 m asl

Hydraulic ConductivityTheis Jacob Straight Line W(u) match 1 Drawdown 0.203 m 1/u match 1 Time 2300 s Drawdown 0.105 m T 1.03E-04 m2/s Time 2200 s K 1.03E-05 m/s T 8.68E-05 m2/s S 3.03E-04 K 8.68E-06 m/s S 4.33E-04

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/22 18:15:00 5.394 9.4062005/09/23 11:12:00 1.493 13.3072005/09/23 11:29:00 1.502 13.2982005/09/23 11:38:00 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 2.25 l/min2005/09/23 12:03:01 1.49 13.312005/09/23 14:20:20 1.517 13.2832005/09/23 14:56:08 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/24 17:49:15 1.478 13.3222005/09/26 08:06:19 1.495 13.3052005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:19:25 1.508 13.292 1760 0.0132005/09/26 11:25:53 1.514 13.286 2148 0.0192005/09/26 11:59:30 1.539 13.261 4165 0.0442005/09/26 13:52:30 1.622 13.178 10945 0.1272005/09/26 16:10:38 1.682 13.118 19233 0.1872005/09/26 17:31:50 1.704 13.096 24105 0.209

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

CONPK-201MW Intermediate Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/27 01:30:11 1.766 13.034 52806 0.2712005/09/27 08:13:05 1.786 13.014 76980 0.2912005/09/27 10:55:10 1.785 13.015 86705 0.292005/09/27 14:54:39 1.785 13.015 101074 0.292005/09/27 17:30:40 1.794 13.006 110435 0.2992005/09/28 08:10:00 1.819 12.981 163195 0.3242005/09/28 10:17:40 1.819 12.981 170855 0.3242005/09/28 16:30:54 1.822 12.978 193249 0.3272005/09/29 07:43:40 1.827 12.973 248015 0.3322005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:13:04 1.828 12.972 253379 0.3332005/09/29 09:37:15 1.825 12.975 254830 0.332005/09/29 09:46:07 1.821 12.979 255362 0.3262005/09/29 09:54:12 1.816 12.984 255847 0.3212005/09/29 10:42:11 1.777 13.023 258726 0.2822005/09/29 11:05:27 1.757 13.043 260122 0.2622005/09/29 11:46:50 1.729 13.071 262605 0.2342005/09/29 12:40:55 1.692 13.108 265850 0.1972005/09/29 13:12:44 1.674 13.126 267759 0.179

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COTS-001MWA Fill/Till

easting 4602200.763 distance from CONPK-200PW 78.36 mnorthing 5113091.425 azimuth 133 degreesreference elevation 14.07 m asl

static water level 3.04 m btocstatic water level 11.03 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:53:15 3.033 11.0372005/09/26 08:09:40 3.04 11.032005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:21:46 3.188 10.882 1901 0.1482005/09/26 12:02:45 3.185 10.885 4360 0.1452005/09/26 13:51:30 3.164 10.906 10885 0.1242005/09/26 16:13:17 3.175 10.895 19392 0.1352005/09/26 17:33:45 3.176 10.894 24220 0.1362005/09/27 01:31:47 3.161 10.909 52902 0.1212005/09/27 08:18:00 3.035 11.035 77275 -0.0052005/09/27 10:53:48 3.031 11.039 86623 -0.0092005/09/27 14:56:31 3.139 10.931 101186 0.0992005/09/27 17:24:00 3.138 10.932 110035 0.0982005/09/28 08:06:25 3.162 10.908 162980 0.1222005/09/28 10:16:10 3.166 10.904 170765 0.1262005/09/28 16:32:45 3.18 10.89 193360 0.142005/09/29 07:45:40 3.205 10.865 248135 0.1652005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:14:50 3.205 10.865 253485 0.1652005/09/29 09:39:43 3.204 10.866 254978 0.1642005/09/29 09:55:45 3.205 10.865 255940 0.1652005/09/29 10:48:27 3.204 10.866 259102 0.1642005/09/29 11:48:25 3.205 10.865 262700 0.1652005/09/29 12:39:45 3.204 10.866 265780 0.1642005/09/29 13:14:25 3.205 10.865 267860 0.165

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 1

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COTS-001MWB Shallow Bedrock

easting 4602200.131 distance from CONPK-200PW 76.67 mnorthing 5113093.228 azimuth 132 degreesreference elevation 14.08 m asl

static water level 2.756 m btocstatic water level 11.324 m asl

Hydraulic ConductivityTheis Jacob Straight Line W(u) match 1 Drawdown 0.058 m 1/u match 1 Time 10400 s Drawdown 0.032 m T 3.61E-04 m2/s Time 12000 s K 3.61E-05 m/s T 2.85E-04 m2/s S 1.44E-03 K 2.85E-05 m/s S 2.33E-03

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:52:00 2.76 11.322005/09/26 08:08:30 2.756 11.3242005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:23:22 2.765 11.315 1997 0.0092005/09/26 12:04:24 2.765 11.315 4459 0.0092005/09/26 13:52:02 2.736 11.344 10917 -0.022005/09/26 16:12:20 2.768 11.312 19335 0.0122005/09/26 17:34:50 2.774 11.306 24285 0.0182005/09/27 01:33:13 2.785 11.295 52988 0.0292005/09/27 08:16:20 2.785 11.295 77175 0.0292005/09/27 10:52:30 2.78 11.3 86545 0.0242005/09/27 14:58:36 2.775 11.305 101311 0.0192005/09/27 17:32:22 2.782 11.298 110537 0.0262005/09/28 08:05:10 2.82 11.26 162905 0.0642005/09/28 10:14:00 2.822 11.258 170635 0.0662005/09/28 16:34:00 2.827 11.253 193435 0.071

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COTS-001MWB Shallow Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/29 07:46:20 2.833 11.247 248175 0.0772005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:16:10 2.833 11.247 253565 0.0772005/09/29 09:39:46 2.832 11.248 254981 0.0762005/09/29 09:56:56 2.831 11.249 256011 0.0752005/09/29 10:49:31 2.826 11.254 259166 0.072005/09/29 11:48:50 2.82 11.26 262725 0.0642005/09/29 12:38:50 2.814 11.266 265725 0.0582005/09/29 13:15:30 2.813 11.267 267925 0.057

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

PN-88-4A Shallow Bedrock

easting 4602037.012 * distance from CONPK-200PW 111.87 mnorthing 5113110.927 * azimuth 252 degreesreference elevation 13.34 m asl

static water level 1.588 m btocstatic water level 11.752 m asl

*used the coordinates for PN-88-4B

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:00:00 1.588 11.7522005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 10:59:00 1.595 11.745 535 0.0072005/09/26 11:30:00 1.595 11.745 2395 0.0072005/09/26 12:06:00 1.611 11.729 4555 0.0232005/09/26 12:48:45 1.592 11.748 7120 0.0042005/09/26 13:12:40 1.609 11.731 8555 0.0212005/09/26 15:13:30 1.607 11.733 15805 0.0192005/09/26 16:27:50 1.609 11.731 20265 0.0212005/09/27 00:33:50 1.612 11.728 49425 0.0242005/09/27 07:24:30 1.611 11.729 74065 0.0232005/09/27 09:47:18 1.611 11.729 82633 0.0232005/09/27 14:41:55 1.608 11.732 100310 0.022005/09/27 18:03:50 1.597 11.743 112425 0.0092005/09/28 07:16:20 1.629 11.711 159975 0.0412005/09/28 09:36:00 1.641 11.699 168355 0.053 different water level meter used2005/09/28 16:55:39 1.636 11.704 194734 0.0482005/09/29 07:28:10 1.635 11.705 247085 0.0472005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:20:20 1.635 11.705 253815 0.0472005/09/29 09:32:00 1.636 11.704 254515 0.0482005/09/29 10:08:00 1.636 11.704 256675 0.048

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

PN-88-4A Shallow Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/29 10:49:30 1.635 11.705 259165 0.0472005/09/29 11:30:40 1.632 11.708 261635 0.0442005/09/29 12:02:10 1.633 11.707 263525 0.0452005/09/29 12:41:26 1.612 11.728 265881 0.0242005/09/29 13:37:00 1.627 11.713 269215 0.039

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

PN-88-4B Fill/Till

easting 4602037.012 distance from CONPK-200PW 111.87 mnorthing 5113110.927 azimuth 252 degreesreference elevation 13.19 m asl

static water level 1.699 m btocstatic water level 11.491 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:00:00 1.675 11.5152005/09/26 07:57:50 1.699 11.4912005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 10:57:30 1.715 11.475 445 0.0162005/09/26 11:31:50 1.719 11.471 2505 0.022005/09/26 12:07:20 1.72 11.47 4635 0.0212005/09/26 12:47:40 1.716 11.474 7055 0.0172005/09/26 13:13:40 1.716 11.474 8615 0.0172005/09/26 15:14:10 1.718 11.472 15845 0.0192005/09/26 16:29:38 1.722 11.468 20373 0.0232005/09/27 00:33:03 1.728 11.462 49378 0.0292005/09/27 07:25:30 1.732 11.458 74125 0.0332005/09/27 09:47:50 1.715 11.475 82665 0.0162005/09/27 14:42:55 1.705 11.485 100370 0.0062005/09/27 18:03:20 1.722 11.468 112395 0.0232005/09/28 07:17:00 1.742 11.448 160015 0.0432005/09/28 09:35:20 1.771 11.419 168315 0.072 different water level meter used2005/09/28 16:58:28 1.771 11.419 194903 0.0722005/09/29 07:28:40 1.756 11.434 247115 0.0572005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:21:10 1.735 11.455 253865 0.0362005/09/29 09:35:00 1.774 11.416 254695 0.0752005/09/29 10:08:40 1.769 11.421 256715 0.072005/09/29 10:50:10 1.765 11.425 259205 0.066

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

PN-88-4B Fill/Till

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/29 11:31:10 1.767 11.423 261665 0.0682005/09/29 12:02:40 1.765 11.425 263555 0.0662005/09/29 12:42:30 1.755 11.435 265945 0.0562005/09/29 13:36:30 1.765 11.425 269185 0.066

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

PN-88-5A Intermediate Bedrock

easting 4602071.429 * distance from CONPK-200PW 174.22 mnorthing 5112986.409 * azimuth 205 degreesreference elevation 12.22 m asl

static water level 3.032 m btocstatic water level 9.188 m asl

*used the coordinates for PN-88-5B

Hydraulic ConductivityTheis Jacob Straight Line W(u) match 1 Drawdown 0.094 m 1/u match 1 Time 41000 s Drawdown 0.057 m T 2.23E-04 m2/s Time 50000 s K 2.23E-05 m/s T 1.60E-04 m2/s S 6.78E-04 K 1.60E-05 m/s S 1.05E-03

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:00:00 3.01 9.212005/09/26 08:50:08 3.032 9.1882005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:15:05 3.03 9.19 1500 -0.0022005/09/26 11:50:45 3.031 9.189 3640 -0.0012005/09/26 12:31:00 3.033 9.187 6055 0.0012005/09/26 13:24:41 3.034 9.186 9276 0.0022005/09/26 15:28:40 3.033 9.187 16715 0.0012005/09/27 00:50:19 3.041 9.179 50414 0.0092005/09/27 07:43:00 3.057 9.163 75175 0.0252005/09/27 10:25:00 3.06 9.16 84895 0.0282005/09/27 15:07:06 3.06 9.16 101821 0.0282005/09/28 07:34:40 3.09 9.13 161075 0.0582005/09/28 09:50:00 3.093 9.127 169195 0.061

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

PN-88-5A Intermediate Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/28 17:12:44 3.09 9.13 195759 0.058 different water level meter used2005/09/29 07:03:00 3.102 9.118 245575 0.072005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:51:00 3.098 9.122 255655 0.0662005/09/29 10:32:00 3.098 9.122 258115 0.0662005/09/29 12:16:00 3.092 9.128 264355 0.062005/09/29 13:55:00 3.089 9.131 270295 0.057

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

PN-88-5B Shallow Bedrock

easting 4602071.429 distance from CONPK-200PW 174.22 mnorthing 5112986.409 azimuth 205 degreesreference elevation 12.17 m asl

static water level 3.054 m btocstatic water level 9.116 m asl

Hydraulic ConductivityTheis Jacob Straight Line W(u) match 1 Drawdown 0.044 m 1/u match 1 Time 54500 s Drawdown 0.043 m T 4.76E-04 m2/s Time 100000 s K 4.76E-05 m/s T 2.12E-04 m2/s S 1.92E-03 K 2.12E-05 m/s S 2.79E-03

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:00:00 3.04 9.132005/09/26 08:49:36 3.054 9.1162005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:12:20 3.051 9.119 1335 -0.0032005/09/26 11:47:50 3.05 9.12 3465 -0.0042005/09/26 12:28:15 3.048 9.122 5890 -0.0062005/09/26 13:23:38 3.045 9.125 9213 -0.0092005/09/26 15:27:00 3.044 9.126 16615 -0.012005/09/27 00:49:15 3.049 9.121 50350 -0.0052005/09/27 09:44:10 3.063 9.107 82445 0.0092005/09/27 10:26:00 3.059 9.111 84955 0.0052005/09/27 15:05:22 3.037 9.133 101717 -0.0172005/09/28 07:35:10 3.071 9.099 161105 0.0172005/09/28 09:50:25 3.078 9.092 169220 0.0242005/09/28 17:14:05 3.075 9.095 195840 0.021 different water level meter used2005/09/29 07:04:00 3.083 9.087 245635 0.029

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

PN-88-5B Shallow Bedrock

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:51:40 3.082 9.088 255695 0.0282005/09/29 10:32:15 3.079 9.091 258130 0.0252005/09/29 12:16:30 3.082 9.088 264385 0.0282005/09/29 13:55:30 3.081 9.089 270325 0.027

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 2 of 2

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

PN-88-5C Fill/Till

easting 4602071.429 * distance from CONPK-200PW 174.22 mnorthing 5112986.409 * azimuth 128 degreesreference elevation 12.11 m asl

static water level 2.655 m btocstatic water level 9.455 m asl

*used the coordinates for PN-88-5B

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/24 17:00:00 2.655 9.4552005/09/26 08:48:59 2.652 9.4582005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:13:40 2.65 9.46 1415 -0.0052005/09/26 11:49:20 2.65 9.46 3555 -0.0052005/09/26 12:29:15 2.649 9.461 5950 -0.0062005/09/26 13:24:04 2.648 9.462 9239 -0.0072005/09/26 15:28:20 2.645 9.465 16695 -0.012005/09/27 00:51:19 2.649 9.461 50474 -0.0062005/09/27 07:45:30 2.656 9.454 75325 0.0012005/09/27 10:26:30 2.654 9.456 84985 -0.0012005/09/27 15:04:18 2.65 9.46 101653 -0.0052005/09/27 17:14:56 2.683 9.427 109491 0.0282005/09/28 07:36:50 2.684 9.426 161205 0.0292005/09/28 09:51:05 2.686 9.424 169260 0.0312005/09/29 07:05:00 2.693 9.417 245695 0.0382005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:52:30 2.693 9.417 255745 0.0382005/09/29 10:32:30 2.692 9.418 258145 0.0372005/09/29 12:17:10 2.695 9.415 264425 0.042005/09/29 13:56:00 2.694 9.416 270355 0.039

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 1

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COB-PIEZ1 Fill/Till In-Bank Stream Piezometer

easting 4602250 distance from CONPK-200PW 136.20 mnorthing 5113060 azimuth 231 degreesreference elevation 11.167 m asl

static water level 1.034 m btocstatic water level 10.133 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/26 09:00:40 1.034 10.1332005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:37:00 1.08 10.087 2815 0.0462005/09/26 12:36:20 1.029 10.138 6375 -0.0052005/09/26 13:49:00 1.022 10.145 10735 -0.0122005/09/26 15:44:00 1.03 10.137 17635 -0.0042005/09/26 17:24:05 1.035 10.132 23640 0.0012005/09/27 01:35:22 1.035 10.132 53117 0.0012005/09/27 11:10:00 1.013 10.154 87595 -0.0212005/09/27 15:13:15 1.015 10.152 102190 -0.0192005/09/28 08:12:45 1.021 10.146 163360 -0.0132005/09/28 10:21:20 1.02 10.147 171075 -0.0142005/09/28 17:23:51 1.036 10.131 196426 0.0022005/09/29 08:10:00 1.031 10.136 249595 -0.0032005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 10:58:18 1.03 10.137 259693 -0.004

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 1

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

COB-PIEZ2 Fill/Till In-Bank Stream Piezometer

easting 4602150 distance from CONPK-200PW 135.14 mnorthing 5113010 azimuth 183 degreesreference elevation 10.441 m asl

static water level 1.07 m btocstatic water level 9.371 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/26 08:45:35 1.07 9.3712005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/26 11:44:50 1.243 9.198 3285 0.1732005/09/26 12:41:03 1.08 9.361 6658 0.012005/09/26 13:28:20 1.05 9.391 9495 -0.022005/09/26 15:34:10 1.064 9.377 17045 -0.0062005/09/27 00:56:09 1.077 9.364 50764 0.0072005/09/27 07:49:06 1.007 9.434 75541 -0.0632005/09/27 10:29:50 1.081 9.36 85185 0.0112005/09/27 15:01:18 1.076 9.365 101473 0.0062005/09/28 07:40:00 1.089 9.352 161395 0.0192005/09/28 09:54:00 1.089 9.352 169435 0.0192005/09/28 17:20:00 1.068 9.373 196195 -0.0022005/09/29 07:10:00 1.104 9.337 245995 0.0342005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 09:55:00 1.103 9.338 255895 0.0332005/09/29 10:52:22 1.088 9.353 259337 0.0182005/09/29 12:20:00 1.088 9.353 264595 0.0182005/09/29 13:59:00 1.089 9.352 270535 0.019

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 1

Appendix B: Manual Data PN 85989

WP-PIEZ1 Fill/Till In-Bank Stream Piezometer

easting 4602210 distance from CONPK-200PW 70.97 mnorthing 5113120 azimuth 111 degreesreference elevation 11.578 m asl

static water level 0.986 m btocstatic water level 10.592 m asl

Date/Time Depth to Water (m) Water Level Elevation (m asl) Elapsed Time (s) Drawdown (m) Comments

2005/09/26 08:24:48 0.986 10.5922005/09/26 10:50:05 pump started in CONPK-200PW at 7 l/min2005/09/29 09:05:00 pump stopped in CONPK-200PW2005/09/29 14:15:00 0.968 10.61 271495 -0.018

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\Technical Memo 5 Appendix B.xls Page 1 of 1

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

Appendix C Borehole Logs

CONPK-200PW85989Pump Test

Sydney Tar Ponds AgencyCoke Ovens Site

Tommy MaBruce Noble

Ground SurfaceOVERBURDEN

BEDROCK

End of Borehole

0.000.00

-5.18

-16.76

8" S

teel

Cas

ing

Gro

utO

verb

urde

nB

edro

ck

September 20, 2005Island Well Drillers

Reich Drill T650-WII

305mm1 of 1

Borehole ID:Project No:Project:Client:Location:

Entered by:Supervised by:

Drill Date:Drilled By:Drill Method:

Hole Size:Sheet 1 of 1

Subsurface Profile

Dep

th

-3ft m

-2

1

-1

2

0

3

1

4

2

5

3

6

4

7

5

8

6

9

7

10

8

11

9

12

10

13

11

14

12

15

13

16

14

17

15

18

1617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162

Sym

bol Description

Dep

th/E

lev.

Wel

l Dat

a Comments

105 Commerce Valley Dr. W.7th Floor, Markham, Ontario

CONPK-200PW85989Pump Test

Sydney Tar Ponds AgencyCoke Ovens Site

Tommy MaBruce Noble

Ground SurfaceOVERBURDEN

BEDROCK

End of Borehole

0.000.00

-5.18

-16.76

8" S

teel

Cas

ing

Gro

utO

verb

urde

nB

edro

ck

September 20, 2005Island Well Drillers

Reich Drill T650-WII

305mm1 of 1

Borehole ID:Project No:Project:Client:Location:

Entered by:Supervised by:

Drill Date:Drilled By:Drill Method:

Hole Size:Sheet 1 of 1

Subsurface Profile

Dep

th

-3ft m

-2

1

-1

2

0

3

1

4

2

5

3

6

4

7

5

8

6

9

7

10

8

11

9

12

10

13

11

14

12

15

13

16

14

17

15

18

1617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162

Sym

bol Description

Dep

th/E

lev.

Wel

l Dat

a Comments

105 Commerce Valley Dr. W.7th Floor, Markham, Ontario

CONPK-201MW85989Pump Test

Sydney Tar Ponds AgencyCoke Ovens Site

Tommy MaR. Barrington

Ground SurfaceOVERBURDEN

WEATHERED BEDROCK

BEDROCK

End of Borehole

0.000.00

-5.18

-8.53

-19.81

6" S

teel

Cas

ing

Gro

utO

verb

urde

nB

edro

ck

September 22, 2005Island Well Drillers

Reich Drill T650-WII

254mm1 of 1

Borehole ID:Project No:Project:Client:Location:

Entered by:Supervised by:

Drill Date:Drilled By:Drill Method:

Hole Size:Sheet 1 of 1

Subsurface Profile

Dep

th

-3ft m

-2

1

-1

2

0

3

1

4

2

5

3

6

4

7

5

8

6

9

7

10

8

11

9

12

10

13

11

14

12

15

13

16

14

17

15

18

16

19

17

20

1819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667

Sym

bol Description

Dep

th/E

lev.

Wel

l Dat

a Comments

105 Commerce Valley Dr. W.7th Floor, Markham, Ontario

Pumping Test Technical Memo Report Remedial Predesign Project Sydney Tar Ponds and Coke Ovens Sites ET 85989

L:\work\85000\85989\04b-Memo\Technical Memo\FINAL Tech Memos\TM 5 Pump Test\FINAL TM5 Pumping Test Tech Memo Report.doc

Appendix D Analytical Results

Your Project #: 85989 Site: COKE OVENS

Attention: Don ShoskyEarth Tech105 Commerce Valley Dr WMarkham, ONL3T 7W3

Report Date: 2005/10/12

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: A595029Received: 2005/09/26, 16:35

Sample Matrix: Water# Samples Received: 1

Date Date MethodAnalyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method ReferenceABN Compounds in Water by GC/MS ( 1 , 3 ) 1 2005/10/04 2005/10/04 Ont SOP-0124 EPA 8270 (modified) TEH in Water (PIRI) ( 2 , 3 ) 1 2005/10/03 2005/10/04 9025_1_5 Based on Atl. PIRI Mercury - Total (CVAA,LL) ( 2 ) 1 N/A 2005/09/29 3425_1_2 Based on EPA245.1 Elements by ICPMS - dissolved 1 N/A 2005/10/05 METH2012 Based on EPA6020A Dis.metals in water ICP-OES 1 N/A 2005/10/09 METH2049 Based on EPA200.7 VPH in Water (PIRI) ( 2 , 3 ) 1 2005/10/04 2005/10/06 9120_1_5 Based on Atl. PIRI ModTPH (T1) Calc. for Water ( 2 , 3 ) 1 N/A 2005/09/27 Based on Atl. PIRI Volatile Organic Compounds in Water ( 2 ) 1 2005/09/29 2005/09/29 9615_1_3 Based on EPA624

(1) This test was performed by Maxxam Analytics Mississauga(2) This test was performed by Bedford(3) SCC/CAEAL

MAXXAM ANALYTICS INC.

NATALIE BURKESr. Project Manager

NBU/nbuencl.

Total cover pages: 1

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 1 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A595029 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/12 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

ATLANTIC MUST IN WATER - PIRI TIER I (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 1 6 2 4Sampling Date 2005/09/26 Units PT-1 RDL QC Batch

TPH COMPOUNDS

Benzene mg/L ND 0.001 834161

Toluene mg/L ND 0.001 834161

Ethylbenzene mg/L ND 0.001 834161

Xylene (Total) mg/L ND 0.002 834161

C6 - C10 (less BTEX) mg/L ND 0.01 834161

>C10-C21 Hydrocarbons mg/L ND 0.06 833127

>C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons mg/L ND 0.1 833127

Modified TPH (Tier1) mg/L ND 0.1 828913

Surrogate Recovery (%)

Isobutylbenzene - Extractable % 98 833127

Isobutylbenzene - Volatile % 100 834161

n-Dotriacontane - Extractable % 101 ( 1 ) 833127

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch( 1 ) Elevated TEH RDL(s) due to insufficient sample.

Page 2 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A595029 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/12 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

ATLANTIC VOC IN WATER PKG. (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 1 6 2 4Sampling Date 2005/09/26 Units PT-1 RDL QC Batch

CHLOROBENZENES

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 831077

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1 831077

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1 831077

Chlorobenzene ug/L ND 1 831077

VOLATILES

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L ND 1 831077

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND 1 831077

1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L ND 1 831077

1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L ND 2 831077

1,1-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND 2 831077

1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L ND 1 831077

1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L ND 1 831077

Benzene ug/L ND 1 831077

Bromodichloromethane ug/L ND 1 831077

Bromoform ug/L ND 1 831077

Bromomethane ug/L ND 8 831077

Carbon Tetrachloride ug/L ND 1 831077

Chloroethane ug/L ND 8 831077

Chloroform ug/L ND 1 831077

Chloromethane ug/L ND 8 831077

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND 2 831077

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND 2 831077

Dibromochloromethane ug/L ND 1 831077

Ethylbenzene ug/L ND 1 831077

Ethylene Dibromide ug/L ND 1 831077

Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) ug/L ND 3 831077

o-Xylene ug/L ND 1 831077

p+m-Xylene ug/L ND 2 831077

Styrene ug/L ND 1 831077

Tetrachloroethylene ug/L ND 1 831077

Toluene ug/L ND 1 831077

trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND 2 831077

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A595029 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/12 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

ATLANTIC VOC IN WATER PKG. (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 1 6 2 4Sampling Date 2005/09/26 Units PT-1 RDL QC Batch

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND 1 831077

Trichloroethylene ug/L ND 1 831077

Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) ug/L ND 8 831077

Vinyl Chloride ug/L ND 1 831077

Surrogate Recovery (%)

4-Bromofluorobenzene % 89 831077

D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 100 831077

D8-Toluene % 98 831077

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 4 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A595029 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/12 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

DISSOLVED METAL SCAN (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 1 6 2 4Sampling Date 2005/09/26 Units PT-1 RDL QC Batch

Elements (ICP-MS)

Dissolved Aluminum (Al) ug/L 9 5 835795

Dissolved Antimony (Sb) ug/L ND 0.4 835795

Dissolved Arsenic (As) ug/L 1.0 0.6 835795

Dissolved Barium (Ba) ug/L 25 0.4 835795

Dissolved Beryllium (Be) ug/L ND 0.5 835795

Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) ug/L ND 2 835795

Dissolved Boron (B) ug/L ND 100 835795

Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) ug/L ND 0.3 835795

Dissolved Chromium (Cr) ug/L ND 1 835795

Dissolved Cobalt (Co) ug/L ND 1 835795

Dissolved Copper (Cu) ug/L 2 2 835795

Dissolved Iron (Fe) ug/L ND 100 835795

Dissolved Lead (Pb) ug/L ND 1 835795

Dissolved Lithium (Li) ug/L 14 1 835795

Dissolved Manganese (Mn) ug/L 97 4 835795

Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) ug/L ND 4 835795

Dissolved Nickel (Ni) ug/L ND 3 835795

Dissolved Phosphorus (P) ug/L ND 100 835795

Dissolved Selenium (Se) ug/L ND 1 835795

Dissolved Silver (Ag) ug/L ND 2 835795

Dissolved Strontium (Sr) ug/L 290 2 835795

Dissolved Sulphur (S) ug/L 11000 4000 835795

Dissolved Thallium (Tl) ug/L ND 0.8 835795

Dissolved Tin (Sn) ug/L ND 20 835795

Dissolved Titanium (Ti) ug/L ND 3 835795

Dissolved Uranium (U) ug/L ND 0.2 835795

Dissolved Vanadium (V) ug/L ND 2 835795

Dissolved Zinc (Zn) ug/L ND 2 835795

Elements (ICP-OES)

Dissolved Calcium (Ca) mg/L 20 0.1 838915

Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) mg/L 2.0 0.1 838915

Dissolved Potassium (K) mg/L 2 1 838915

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 5 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A595029 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/12 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

DISSOLVED METAL SCAN (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 1 6 2 4Sampling Date 2005/09/26 Units PT-1 RDL QC Batch

Dissolved Silicon (Si) mg/L 4.8 0.5 838915

Dissolved Sodium (Na) mg/L 50 1 838915

RDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 6 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A595029 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/12 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 1 6 2 4Sampling Date 2005/09/26 Units PT-1 RDL QC Batch

ELEMENTS

Total Mercury (Hg) ug/L ND 0.01 831026

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 7 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A595029 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/12 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 1 6 2 4Sampling Date 2005/09/26 Units PT-1 RDL QC Batch

SEMIVOLATILES

Acenaphthene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Acenaphthylene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Acridine ug/L ND 2 834248

Anthracene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

1-Chloronaphthalene ug/L ND 1 834248

2-Chloronaphthalene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Chrysene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Fluoranthene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Fluorene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

1-Methylnaphthalene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

2-Methylnaphthalene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Naphthalene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Phenanthrene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Pyrene ug/L ND 0.2 834248

Quinoline ug/L ND 2 834248

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Hexachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Pentachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 8 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A595029 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/12 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 1 6 2 4Sampling Date 2005/09/26 Units PT-1 RDL QC Batch

2-Chlorophenol ug/L ND 0.3 834248

4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

m/p-Cresol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

o-Cresol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

2,3-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

2,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.3 834248

2,5-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

2,6-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

3,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

3,5-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

2,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

2,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L ND 2 834248

4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ug/L ND 2 834248

2-Nitrophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

4-Nitrophenol ug/L ND 1 834248

Pentachlorophenol ug/L ND 1 834248

Phenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L ND 0.4 834248

2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

2,3,4-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

2,3,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

2,3,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

3,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Biphenyl ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ug/L ND 2 834248

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 9 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A595029 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/12 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 1 6 2 4Sampling Date 2005/09/26 Units PT-1 RDL QC Batch

4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L ND 0.3 834248

p-Chloroaniline ug/L ND 1 834248

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L ND 0.5 834248

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Diethyl phthalate ug/L ND 1 834248

Dimethyl phthalate ug/L ND 1 834248

Di-N-butyl phthalate ug/L ND 2 834248

Di-N-octyl phthalate ug/L ND 0.8 834248

2,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

2,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Diphenyl Ether ug/L ND 0.3 834248

Hexachlorobutadiene ug/L ND 0.4 834248

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ug/L ND 2 834248

Hexachloroethane ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Isophorone ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Nitrobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L ND 1 834248

N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine ug/L ND 0.5 834248

Surrogate Recovery (%)

2,4,6-Tribromophenol % 79 834248

2-Fluorobiphenyl % 66 834248

2-Fluorophenol % 44 834248

D14-Terphenyl (FS) % 94 834248

D5-Nitrobenzene % 67 834248

D5-Phenol % 30 834248

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 10 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A595029 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/12 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (WATER)

ABN Compounds in Water by GC/MS: The recovery for Camphene in the Spiked Blank was below the lower control limit. This may represent a lowbias in some of the results for this specific compound.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 11 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance ReportMaxxam Job Number: KA595029

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits831026 SSI MATRIX SPIKE Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/09/29 100 % 80 - 120

QC STANDARD Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/09/29 102 % 80 - 120Spiked Blank Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/09/29 92 % 80 - 120Method Blank Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/09/29 ND, DL=0.013 ug/LRPD Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/09/29 NC % 25

831077 RMC MATRIX SPIKE 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 95 % 70 - 1301,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 95 % 70 - 1301,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 89 % 70 - 130Chlorobenzene 2005/09/29 111 % 70 - 1301,1,1-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 1301,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2005/09/29 121 % 70 - 1301,1,2-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 121 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 111 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 121 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloropropane 2005/09/29 121 % 70 - 1304-Bromofluorobenzene 2005/09/29 102 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/09/29 111 % 70 - 130Bromodichloromethane 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 130Bromoform 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 130Bromomethane 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 130Carbon Tetrachloride 2005/09/29 84 % 70 - 130Chloroethane 2005/09/29 116 % 70 - 130Chloroform 2005/09/29 111 % 70 - 130Chloromethane 2005/09/29 111 % 70 - 130cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 120 % 70 - 130cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 102 % 70 - 130D8-Toluene 2005/09/29 99 % 70 - 130Dibromochloromethane 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 130Ethylene Dibromide 2005/09/29 125 % 70 - 130Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2005/09/29 121 % 70 - 130o-Xylene 2005/09/29 115 % 70 - 130p+m-Xylene 2005/09/29 110 % 70 - 130Styrene 2005/09/29 115 % 70 - 130Tetrachloroethylene 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 130Toluene 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 130trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 130trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 95 % 70 - 130Trichloroethylene 2005/09/29 111 % 70 - 130Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2005/09/29 89 % 70 - 130Vinyl Chloride 2005/09/29 111 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 90 % 70 - 1301,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 90 % 70 - 1301,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 88 % 70 - 130Chlorobenzene 2005/09/29 99 % 70 - 1301,1,1-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 1301,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2005/09/29 91 % 70 - 1301,1,2-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 103 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 101 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 106 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 99 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloropropane 2005/09/29 101 % 70 - 1304-Bromofluorobenzene 2005/09/29 102 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/09/29 99 % 70 - 130

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 12 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA595029

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits831077 RMC Spiked Blank Bromodichloromethane 2005/09/29 90 % 70 - 130

Bromoform 2005/09/29 81 % 70 - 130Bromomethane 2005/09/29 93 % 70 - 130Carbon Tetrachloride 2005/09/29 92 % 70 - 130Chloroethane 2005/09/29 107 % 70 - 130Chloroform 2005/09/29 103 % 70 - 130Chloromethane 2005/09/29 99 % 70 - 130cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 112 % 70 - 130cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 92 % 70 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 101 % 70 - 130D8-Toluene 2005/09/29 103 % 70 - 130Dibromochloromethane 2005/09/29 89 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2005/09/29 97 % 70 - 130Ethylene Dibromide 2005/09/29 106 % 70 - 130Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2005/09/29 107 % 70 - 130o-Xylene 2005/09/29 108 % 70 - 130p+m-Xylene 2005/09/29 108 % 70 - 130Styrene 2005/09/29 106 % 70 - 130Tetrachloroethylene 2005/09/29 104 % 70 - 130Toluene 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 130trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 97 % 70 - 130trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 83 % 70 - 130Trichloroethylene 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 130Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2005/09/29 102 % 70 - 130Vinyl Chloride 2005/09/29 106 % 70 - 130

Method Blank 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LChlorobenzene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,1-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=2 ug/L1,1-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=2 ug/L1,2-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,2-Dichloropropane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L4-Bromofluorobenzene 2005/09/29 93 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LBromodichloromethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LBromoform 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LBromomethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=8 ug/LCarbon Tetrachloride 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LChloroethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=8 ug/LChloroform 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LChloromethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=8 ug/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=2 ug/Lcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=2 ug/LD4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 101 % 70 - 130D8-Toluene 2005/09/29 99 % 70 - 130Dibromochloromethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LEthylbenzene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LEthylene Dibromide 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LMethylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2005/09/29 ND, DL=3 ug/Lo-Xylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/Lp+m-Xylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=2 ug/LStyrene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 13 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA595029

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits831077 RMC Method Blank Tetrachloroethylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L

Toluene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/Ltrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=2 ug/Ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LTrichloroethylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LTrichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2005/09/29 ND, DL=8 ug/LVinyl Chloride 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L

833127 AMY MATRIX SPIKE Isobutylbenzene - Extractable 2005/10/04 94 % 30 - 130n-Dotriacontane - Extractable 2005/10/04 101 % 30 - 130>C10-C21 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/04 86 % 30 - 130>C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/04 83 % 30 - 130

Spiked Blank Isobutylbenzene - Extractable 2005/10/04 96 % 30 - 130n-Dotriacontane - Extractable 2005/10/04 96 % 30 - 130>C10-C21 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/04 82 % 30 - 130>C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/04 83 % 30 - 130

Method Blank Isobutylbenzene - Extractable 2005/10/04 98 % 30 - 130n-Dotriacontane - Extractable 2005/10/04 96 % 30 - 130>C10-C21 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.05 mg/L>C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.1 mg/L

RPD >C10-C21 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/04 NC % 40>C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/04 NC % 40

834161 MSK MATRIX SPIKE Isobutylbenzene - Volatile 2005/10/06 103 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/10/06 104 % 70 - 130Toluene 2005/10/06 109 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2005/10/06 113 % 70 - 130Xylene (Total) 2005/10/06 114 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank Isobutylbenzene - Volatile 2005/10/06 99 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/10/06 109 % 70 - 130Toluene 2005/10/06 109 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2005/10/06 113 % 70 - 130Xylene (Total) 2005/10/06 114 % 70 - 130

Method Blank Isobutylbenzene - Volatile 2005/10/06 102 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/10/06 ND, DL=0.001 mg/LToluene 2005/10/06 ND, DL=0.001 mg/LEthylbenzene 2005/10/06 ND, DL=0.001 mg/LXylene (Total) 2005/10/06 ND, DL=0.002 mg/LC6 - C10 (less BTEX) 2005/10/06 ND, DL=0.01 mg/L

RPD Benzene 2005/10/06 NC % 40Toluene 2005/10/06 NC % 40Ethylbenzene 2005/10/06 NC % 40Xylene (Total) 2005/10/06 NC % 40C6 - C10 (less BTEX) 2005/10/06 NC % 40

834248 FLM Spiked Blank 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 2005/10/04 92 % 10 - 1302-Fluorobiphenyl 2005/10/04 65 % 30 - 1302-Fluorophenol 2005/10/04 41 % 10 - 130D14-Terphenyl (FS) 2005/10/04 96 % 30 - 130D5-Nitrobenzene 2005/10/04 55 % 30 - 130D5-Phenol 2005/10/04 30 % 10 - 130Acenaphthene 2005/10/04 77 % 55 - 130

RPD Acenaphthene 2005/10/04 5.7 % 40Spiked Blank Acenaphthylene 2005/10/04 77 % 46 - 130RPD Acenaphthylene 2005/10/04 8.0 % 40Spiked Blank Acridine 2005/10/04 97 % 30 - 130RPD Acridine 2005/10/04 0.2 % 40Spiked Blank Anthracene 2005/10/04 88 % 48 - 128RPD Anthracene 2005/10/04 1.3 % 40

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 14 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA595029

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits834248 FLM Spiked Blank Benzo(a)anthracene 2005/10/04 98 % 30 - 130

RPD Benzo(a)anthracene 2005/10/04 1.3 % 40Spiked Blank Benzo(a)pyrene 2005/10/04 98 % 31 - 130RPD Benzo(a)pyrene 2005/10/04 1.0 % 40Spiked Blank Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene 2005/10/04 98 % 30 - 130RPD Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene 2005/10/04 1.8 % 40Spiked Blank Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2005/10/04 95 % 40 - 130RPD Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2005/10/04 2.5 % 40Spiked Blank Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2005/10/04 83 % 30 - 130RPD Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2005/10/04 1.7 % 40Spiked Blank 1-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/04 67 % 40 - 130RPD 1-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/04 30.0 % 40Spiked Blank 2-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/04 70 % 34 - 119RPD 2-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/04 1.9 % 40Spiked Blank Chrysene 2005/10/04 100 % 44 - 130RPD Chrysene 2005/10/04 0.7 % 40Spiked Blank Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2005/10/04 96 % 30 - 130RPD Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2005/10/04 2.0 % 40Spiked Blank Fluoranthene 2005/10/04 98 % 26 - 137RPD Fluoranthene 2005/10/04 0.2 % 40Spiked Blank Fluorene 2005/10/04 90 % 50 - 122RPD Fluorene 2005/10/04 0.5 % 40Spiked Blank Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2005/10/04 97 % 30 - 130RPD Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2005/10/04 0.3 % 40Spiked Blank 1-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/04 61 % 40 - 130RPD 1-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/04 16.4 % 40Spiked Blank 2-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/04 59 % 40 - 130RPD 2-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/04 19.0 % 40Spiked Blank Naphthalene 2005/10/04 60 % 35 - 120RPD Naphthalene 2005/10/04 18.4 % 40Spiked Blank Phenanthrene 2005/10/04 96 % 54 - 120RPD Phenanthrene 2005/10/04 2.2 % 40Spiked Blank Pyrene 2005/10/04 99 % 66 - 132RPD Pyrene 2005/10/04 0.6 % 40Spiked Blank Quinoline 2005/10/04 84 % 30 - 130RPD Quinoline 2005/10/04 11.8 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 44 % 30 - 112RPD 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 18.8 % 40Spiked Blank 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 42 % 30 - 130RPD 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 17.2 % 40Spiked Blank 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 42 % 37 - 106RPD 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 20.7 % 40Spiked Blank Hexachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 94 % 30 - 130RPD Hexachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 1.8 % 40Spiked Blank Pentachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 81 % 40 - 130RPD Pentachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 3.3 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 53 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 14.4 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 62 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 9.3 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 51 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 15.7 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 47 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 16.6 % 40Spiked Blank 1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 50 % 40 - 130RPD 1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 18.9 % 40

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 15 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA595029

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits834248 FLM Spiked Blank 2-Chlorophenol 2005/10/04 56 % 10 - 130

RPD 2-Chlorophenol 2005/10/04 18.9 % 40Spiked Blank 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 2005/10/04 88 % 10 - 130RPD 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 2005/10/04 2.4 % 40Spiked Blank m/p-Cresol 2005/10/04 58 % 10 - 130RPD m/p-Cresol 2005/10/04 10.5 % 40Spiked Blank o-Cresol 2005/10/04 56 % 10 - 130RPD o-Cresol 2005/10/04 15.2 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 63 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 9.5 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 67 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 12.8 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 61 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 19.5 % 40Spiked Blank 2,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 67 % 10 - 130RPD 2,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 11.3 % 40Spiked Blank 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 59 % 10 - 130RPD 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 14.8 % 40Spiked Blank 3,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 87 % 10 - 130RPD 3,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 2.4 % 40Spiked Blank 3,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 88 % 10 - 130RPD 3,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 1.1 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2005/10/04 63 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2005/10/04 13.2 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4-Dinitrophenol 2005/10/04 86 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4-Dinitrophenol 2005/10/04 2.9 % 40Spiked Blank 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2005/10/04 92 % 10 - 130RPD 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2005/10/04 2.7 % 40Spiked Blank 2-Nitrophenol 2005/10/04 55 % 10 - 130RPD 2-Nitrophenol 2005/10/04 18.7 % 40Spiked Blank 4-Nitrophenol 2005/10/04 48 % 10 - 130RPD 4-Nitrophenol 2005/10/04 6.4 % 40Spiked Blank Pentachlorophenol 2005/10/04 96 % 10 - 130RPD Pentachlorophenol 2005/10/04 2.7 % 40Spiked Blank Phenol 2005/10/04 33 % 10 - 130RPD Phenol 2005/10/04 13.5 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/04 101 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/04 1.0 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/04 90 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/04 4.8 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/04 81 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/04 5.4 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,4-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 81 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,4-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 2.4 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 76 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 6.6 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 83 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 5.5 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 83 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 2.2 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 78 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 3.3 % 40Spiked Blank 3,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 96 % 10 - 130RPD 3,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 1 % 40Spiked Blank Benzyl butyl phthalate 2005/10/04 108 % 30 - 130RPD Benzyl butyl phthalate 2005/10/04 1.5 % 40

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 16 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA595029

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits834248 FLM Spiked Blank Biphenyl 2005/10/04 71 % 40 - 130

RPD Biphenyl 2005/10/04 10.8 % 40Spiked Blank Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 2005/10/04 54 % 42 - 126RPD Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 2005/10/04 21.8 % 40Spiked Blank Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 2005/10/04 69 % 49 - 130RPD Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 2005/10/04 14.7 % 40Spiked Blank Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 2005/10/04 56 % 42 - 102RPD Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 2005/10/04 21.2 % 40Spiked Blank Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 2005/10/04 109 % 57 - 167RPD Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 2005/10/04 1.2 % 40Spiked Blank 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/04 97 % 53 - 127RPD 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/04 2.4 % 40Spiked Blank p-Chloroaniline 2005/10/04 62 % 30 - 130RPD p-Chloroaniline 2005/10/04 6.8 % 40Spiked Blank 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/04 91 % 38 - 130RPD 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/04 1.3 % 40Spiked Blank 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2005/10/04 79 % 30 - 130RPD 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2005/10/04 6.0 % 40Spiked Blank Diethyl phthalate 2005/10/04 103 % 30 - 114RPD Diethyl phthalate 2005/10/04 0.5 % 40Spiked Blank Dimethyl phthalate 2005/10/04 99 % 30 - 112RPD Dimethyl phthalate 2005/10/04 1.5 % 40Spiked Blank Di-N-butyl phthalate 2005/10/04 108 % 30 - 130RPD Di-N-butyl phthalate 2005/10/04 0.1 % 40Spiked Blank Di-N-octyl phthalate 2005/10/04 105 % 30 - 130RPD Di-N-octyl phthalate 2005/10/04 0.2 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/04 93 % 47 - 127RPD 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/04 1.2 % 40Spiked Blank 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/04 94 % 30 - 130RPD 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/04 2.3 % 40Spiked Blank Diphenyl Ether 2005/10/04 74 % 40 - 130RPD Diphenyl Ether 2005/10/04 8.9 % 40Spiked Blank Hexachlorobutadiene 2005/10/04 38 % 30 - 116RPD Hexachlorobutadiene 2005/10/04 13.4 % 40Spiked Blank Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2005/10/04 43 % 30 - 130RPD Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2005/10/04 15.0 % 40Spiked Blank Hexachloroethane 2005/10/04 73 % 30 - 130RPD Hexachloroethane 2005/10/04 8.8 % 40Spiked Blank Isophorone 2005/10/04 77 % 35 - 150RPD Isophorone 2005/10/04 8.2 % 40Spiked Blank Nitrobenzene 2005/10/04 58 % 39 - 105RPD Nitrobenzene 2005/10/04 16.9 % 40Spiked Blank Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine 2005/10/04 102 % 40 - 130RPD Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine 2005/10/04 2.6 % 40Spiked Blank N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 2005/10/04 68 % 30 - 130RPD N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 2005/10/04 14.0 % 40Method Blank 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 2005/10/04 72 % 10 - 130

2-Fluorobiphenyl 2005/10/04 49 % 30 - 1302-Fluorophenol 2005/10/04 35 % 10 - 130D14-Terphenyl (FS) 2005/10/04 92 % 30 - 130D5-Nitrobenzene 2005/10/04 48 % 30 - 130D5-Phenol 2005/10/04 25 % 10 - 130Acenaphthene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LAcenaphthylene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LAcridine 2005/10/04 ND, DL=2 ug/LAnthracene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 17 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA595029

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits834248 FLM Method Blank Benzo(a)anthracene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L

Benzo(a)pyrene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LBenzo(b/j)fluoranthene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L1-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/L2-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LChrysene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LDibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LFluoranthene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LFluorene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L1-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L2-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LNaphthalene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LPhenanthrene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LPyrene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LQuinoline 2005/10/04 ND, DL=2 ug/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LHexachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LPentachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2-Chlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.3 ug/L4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/Lm/p-Cresol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/Lo-Cresol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.3 ug/L2,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,6-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L3,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L3,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4-Dimethylphenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4-Dinitrophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=2 ug/L4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=2 ug/L2-Nitrophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L4-Nitrophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LPentachlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LPhenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.4 ug/L2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,4-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L3,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBenzyl butyl phthalate 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 18 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA595029

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits834248 FLM Method Blank Biphenyl 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L

Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 2005/10/04 ND, DL=2 ug/L4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.3 ug/Lp-Chloroaniline 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/L4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LDiethyl phthalate 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LDimethyl phthalate 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LDi-N-butyl phthalate 2005/10/04 ND, DL=2 ug/LDi-N-octyl phthalate 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.8 ug/L2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,6-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LDiphenyl Ether 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.3 ug/LHexachlorobutadiene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.4 ug/LHexachlorocyclopentadiene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=2 ug/LHexachloroethane 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LIsophorone 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LNitrobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LNitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L

835795 MSA MATRIX SPIKE Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/05 89 % 75 - 125Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/05 91 % 75 - 125Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/05 92 % 75 - 125Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/05 112 % 75 - 125Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/05 103 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/05 102 % 75 - 125Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/05 97 % 75 - 125Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/05 106 % 75 - 125Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/05 100 % 75 - 125Dissolved Sulphur (S) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/05 96 % 75 - 125Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2005/10/05 91 % 75 - 125Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2005/10/05 91 % 75 - 125Dissolved Uranium (U) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/05 91 % 75 - 125Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2005/10/05 85 % 75 - 125

QC STANDARD Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/05 86 % 75 - 125Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/05 99 % 75 - 125Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/05 85 % 75 - 125Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/05 90 % 75 - 125Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/05 107 % 75 - 125

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 19 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA595029

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits835795 MSA QC STANDARD Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/05 105 % 75 - 125

Dissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/05 110 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/05 85 % 75 - 125Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/05 102 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/05 97 % 75 - 125Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2005/10/05 97 % 75 - 125Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/05 94 % 75 - 125Dissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/05 114 % 75 - 125Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2005/10/05 102 % 75 - 125Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/05 111 % 75 - 125Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/05 99 % 75 - 125Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/05 86 % 75 - 125Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/05 104 % 75 - 125Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/05 96 % 75 - 125Dissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/05 97 % 75 - 125Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/05 110 % 75 - 125Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2005/10/05 92 % 75 - 125

Spiked Blank Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/05 96 % 75 - 125Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/05 105 % 75 - 125Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/05 96 % 75 - 125Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/05 107 % 75 - 125Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/05 104 % 75 - 125Dissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/05 106 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/05 95 % 75 - 125Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/05 96 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/05 101 % 75 - 125Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2005/10/05 103 % 75 - 125Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2005/10/05 86 % 75 - 125Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/05 85 % 75 - 125Dissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/05 109 % 75 - 125Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2005/10/05 92 % 75 - 125Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/05 112 % 75 - 125Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/05 104 % 75 - 125Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2005/10/05 107 % 75 - 125Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/05 97 % 75 - 125Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/05 93 % 75 - 125Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/05 99 % 75 - 125Dissolved Sulphur (S) 2005/10/05 100 % 75 - 125Dissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/05 105 % 75 - 125Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2005/10/05 103 % 75 - 125Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2005/10/05 106 % 75 - 125Dissolved Uranium (U) 2005/10/05 111 % 75 - 125Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/05 107 % 75 - 125Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2005/10/05 99 % 75 - 125

Method Blank Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=5 ug/LDissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.4 ug/LDissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.6 ug/LDissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.4 ug/LDissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LDissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=100 ug/LDissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.3 ug/LDissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=1 ug/LDissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=1 ug/L

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 20 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA595029

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits835795 MSA Method Blank Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=2 ug/L

Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=100 ug/LDissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=1 ug/LDissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=1 ug/LDissolved Manganese (Mn) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=4 ug/LDissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=4 ug/LDissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=3 ug/LDissolved Phosphorus (P) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=100 ug/LDissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=1 ug/LDissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Sulphur (S) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=4000 ug/LDissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.8 ug/LDissolved Tin (Sn) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=20 ug/LDissolved Titanium (Ti) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=3 ug/LDissolved Uranium (U) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LDissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Zinc (Zn) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=2 ug/L

RPD Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/05 3.0 % 25Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/05 0.8 % 25Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/05 0.7 % 25Dissolved Sulphur (S) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Uranium (U) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/05 NC % 25

838915 TMD MATRIX SPIKE Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2005/10/09 107 % 70 - 130Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2005/10/09 105 % 70 - 130Dissolved Potassium (K) 2005/10/09 104 % 70 - 130Dissolved Silicon (Si) 2005/10/09 111 % 70 - 130Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/09 - % 70 - 130

QC STANDARD Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2005/10/09 102 % 70 - 130Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2005/10/09 113 % 70 - 130Dissolved Potassium (K) 2005/10/09 87 % 70 - 130Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/09 103 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2005/10/09 110 % 70 - 130Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2005/10/09 94 % 70 - 130Dissolved Potassium (K) 2005/10/09 74 % 70 - 130Dissolved Silicon (Si) 2005/10/09 107 % 70 - 130Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/09 76 % 70 - 130

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 21 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA595029

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits838915 TMD Method Blank Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2005/10/09 0.1, DL=0.1 mg/L

Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2005/10/09 0.2, DL=0.1 mg/LDissolved Potassium (K) 2005/10/09 ND, DL=1 mg/LDissolved Silicon (Si) 2005/10/09 ND, DL=0.5 mg/LDissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/09 ND, DL=1 mg/L

RPD Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/09 NC % 30

ND = Not detectedNC = Non-calculableRPD = Relative Percent DifferenceQC Standard = Quality Control StandardSPIKE = Fortified sample

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 22 of 22

Your Project #: 85989 Site: COKE OVENS

Attention: Don ShoskyEarth Tech105 Commerce Valley Dr WMarkham, ONL3T 7W3

Report Date: 2005/10/17

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: A596061Received: 2005/09/28, 13:05

Sample Matrix: Water# Samples Received: 3

Date Date MethodAnalyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method ReferenceABN Compounds in Water by GC/MS ( 1 , 3 ) 1 2005/10/07 2005/10/07 Ont SOP-0124 EPA 8270 (modified) TEH in Water (PIRI) ( 2 , 3 ) 1 2005/10/04 2005/10/05 9025_1_5 Based on Atl. PIRI Mercury - Total (CVAA,LL) ( 2 ) 1 N/A 2005/09/30 3425_1_2 Based on EPA245.1 Elements by ICPMS - dissolved 1 N/A 2005/10/05 METH2012 Based on EPA6020A Dis.metals in water ICP-OES 1 N/A 2005/10/12 METH2049 Based on EPA200.7 VPH in Water (PIRI) ( 2 , 3 ) 1 2005/10/06 2005/10/09 9120_1_5 Based on Atl. PIRI ModTPH (T1) Calc. for Water ( 2 , 3 ) 1 N/A 2005/09/29 Based on Atl. PIRI Volatile Organic Compounds in Water ( 2 ) 3 2005/09/29 2005/09/29 9615_1_3 Based on EPA624

(1) This test was performed by Maxxam Analytics Mississauga(2) This test was performed by Bedford(3) SCC/CAEAL

MAXXAM ANALYTICS INC.

NATALIE BURKESr. Project Manager

NBU/nbuencl.

Total cover pages: 1

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 1 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596061 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/17 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

ATLANTIC MUST IN WATER - PIRI TIER I (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 5 8 8 7Sampling Date 2005/09/27 Units PT-2 RDL QC Batch

TPH COMPOUNDS

Benzene mg/L ND 0.001 836589

Toluene mg/L ND 0.001 836589

Ethylbenzene mg/L ND 0.001 836589

Xylene (Total) mg/L ND 0.002 836589

C6 - C10 (less BTEX) mg/L ND 0.01 836589

>C10-C21 Hydrocarbons mg/L ND 0.06 834910

>C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons mg/L ND 0.1 834910

Modified TPH (Tier1) mg/L ND 0.1 830951

Surrogate Recovery (%)

Isobutylbenzene - Extractable % 95 834910

Isobutylbenzene - Volatile % 99 836589

n-Dotriacontane - Extractable % 101 834910

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596061 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/17 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

ATLANTIC VOC IN WATER PKG. (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 5 8 8 7 I 4 5 9 0 3 I 4 5 9 0 5Sampling Date 2005/09/27 2005/09/27 2005/09/27 Units PT-2 TRIP BLANK FIELD RDL QC Batch

BLANK

CHLOROBENZENES

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND ND ND 0.5 831130

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Chlorobenzene ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

VOLATILES

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L ND ND ND 2 831130

1,1-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND ND ND 2 831130

1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Benzene ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Bromodichloromethane ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Bromoform ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Bromomethane ug/L ND ND ND 8 831130

Carbon Tetrachloride ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Chloroethane ug/L ND ND ND 8 831130

Chloroform ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Chloromethane ug/L ND ND ND 8 831130

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND ND ND 2 831130

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND ND ND 2 831130

Dibromochloromethane ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Ethylbenzene ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Ethylene Dibromide ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) ug/L ND 11 10 3 831130

o-Xylene ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

p+m-Xylene ug/L ND ND ND 2 831130

Styrene ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Tetrachloroethylene ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Toluene ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND ND ND 2 831130

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596061 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/17 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

ATLANTIC VOC IN WATER PKG. (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 5 8 8 7 I 4 5 9 0 3 I 4 5 9 0 5Sampling Date 2005/09/27 2005/09/27 2005/09/27 Units PT-2 TRIP BLANK FIELD RDL QC Batch

BLANK

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Trichloroethylene ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) ug/L ND ND ND 8 831130

Vinyl Chloride ug/L ND ND ND 1 831130

Surrogate Recovery (%)

4-Bromofluorobenzene % 89 88 87 831130

D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 102 101 101 831130

D8-Toluene % 99 98 97 831130

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 4 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596061 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/17 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

DISSOLVED METAL SCAN (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 5 8 8 7Sampling Date 2005/09/27 Units PT-2 RDL QC Batch

Elements (ICP-MS)

Dissolved Aluminum (Al) ug/L 13 5 835795

Dissolved Antimony (Sb) ug/L ND 0.4 835795

Dissolved Arsenic (As) ug/L 0.9 0.6 835795

Dissolved Barium (Ba) ug/L 27 0.4 835795

Dissolved Beryllium (Be) ug/L ND 0.5 835795

Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) ug/L ND 2 835795

Dissolved Boron (B) ug/L ND 100 835795

Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) ug/L ND 0.3 835795

Dissolved Chromium (Cr) ug/L ND 1 835795

Dissolved Cobalt (Co) ug/L ND 1 835795

Dissolved Copper (Cu) ug/L ND 2 835795

Dissolved Iron (Fe) ug/L ND 100 835795

Dissolved Lead (Pb) ug/L ND 1 835795

Dissolved Lithium (Li) ug/L 13 1 835795

Dissolved Manganese (Mn) ug/L 120 4 835795

Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) ug/L ND 4 835795

Dissolved Nickel (Ni) ug/L ND 3 835795

Dissolved Phosphorus (P) ug/L ND 100 835795

Dissolved Selenium (Se) ug/L ND 1 835795

Dissolved Silver (Ag) ug/L ND 2 835795

Dissolved Strontium (Sr) ug/L 320 2 835795

Dissolved Sulphur (S) ug/L 11000 4000 835795

Dissolved Thallium (Tl) ug/L ND 0.8 835795

Dissolved Tin (Sn) ug/L ND 20 835795

Dissolved Titanium (Ti) ug/L ND 3 835795

Dissolved Uranium (U) ug/L ND 0.2 835795

Dissolved Vanadium (V) ug/L ND 2 835795

Dissolved Zinc (Zn) ug/L 2 2 835795

Elements (ICP-OES)

Dissolved Calcium (Ca) mg/L 19 0.1 840434

Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) mg/L 2.1 0.1 840434

Dissolved Potassium (K) mg/L 2 1 840434

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 5 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596061 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/17 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

DISSOLVED METAL SCAN (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 5 8 8 7Sampling Date 2005/09/27 Units PT-2 RDL QC Batch

Dissolved Silicon (Si) mg/L 4.8 0.5 840434

Dissolved Sodium (Na) mg/L 52 1 840434

RDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 6 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596061 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/17 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 5 8 8 7Sampling Date 2005/09/27 Units PT-2 RDL QC Batch

ELEMENTS

Total Mercury (Hg) ug/L ND 0.01 831990

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 7 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596061 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/17 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 5 8 8 7Sampling Date 2005/09/27 Units PT-2 RDL QC Batch

SEMIVOLATILES

Acenaphthene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Acenaphthylene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Acridine ug/L ND 2 837578

Anthracene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

1-Chloronaphthalene ug/L ND 1 837578

2-Chloronaphthalene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Chrysene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Fluoranthene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Fluorene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

1-Methylnaphthalene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

2-Methylnaphthalene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Naphthalene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Phenanthrene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Pyrene ug/L ND 0.2 837578

Quinoline ug/L ND 2 837578

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Hexachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Pentachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 8 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596061 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/17 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 5 8 8 7Sampling Date 2005/09/27 Units PT-2 RDL QC Batch

2-Chlorophenol ug/L ND 0.3 837578

4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

m/p-Cresol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

o-Cresol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

2,3-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

2,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.3 837578

2,5-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

2,6-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

3,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

3,5-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

2,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

2,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L ND 2 837578

4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ug/L ND 2 837578

2-Nitrophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

4-Nitrophenol ug/L ND 1 837578

Pentachlorophenol ug/L ND 1 837578

Phenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L ND 0.4 837578

2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

2,3,4-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

2,3,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

2,3,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

3,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Biphenyl ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ug/L ND 2 837578

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 9 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596061 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/17 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 5 8 8 7Sampling Date 2005/09/27 Units PT-2 RDL QC Batch

4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L ND 0.3 837578

p-Chloroaniline ug/L ND 1 837578

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L ND 0.5 837578

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Diethyl phthalate ug/L ND 1 837578

Dimethyl phthalate ug/L ND 1 837578

Di-N-butyl phthalate ug/L ND 2 837578

Di-N-octyl phthalate ug/L ND 0.8 837578

2,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

2,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Diphenyl Ether ug/L ND 0.3 837578

Hexachlorobutadiene ug/L ND 0.4 837578

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ug/L ND 2 837578

Hexachloroethane ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Isophorone ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Nitrobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L ND 1 837578

N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine ug/L ND 0.5 837578

Surrogate Recovery (%)

2,4,6-Tribromophenol % 85 837578

2-Fluorobiphenyl % 78 837578

2-Fluorophenol % 60 837578

D14-Terphenyl (FS) % 107 837578

D5-Nitrobenzene % 68 837578

D5-Phenol % 39 837578

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 10 of 22

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596061 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/17 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (WATER)

ABN Compounds in Water by GC/MS: ABN Analysis:The recovery for indole and hexachlorocyclopentadiene were below the lower control limit. This may represent a low bias in some results for thesespecific parameters.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 11 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance ReportMaxxam Job Number: KA596061

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits831130 RMC MATRIX SPIKE

[I45903-01] 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 1301,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 1301,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 130Chlorobenzene 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 1301,1,1-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 1301,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2005/09/29 111 % 70 - 1301,1,2-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 111 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloropropane 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 1304-Bromofluorobenzene 2005/09/29 103 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 130Bromodichloromethane 2005/09/29 95 % 70 - 130Bromoform 2005/09/29 84 % 70 - 130Bromomethane 2005/09/29 95 % 70 - 130Carbon Tetrachloride 2005/09/29 95 % 70 - 130Chloroethane 2005/09/29 111 % 70 - 130Chloroform 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 130Chloromethane 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 130cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 115 % 70 - 130cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 84 % 70 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 101 % 70 - 130D8-Toluene 2005/09/29 101 % 70 - 130Dibromochloromethane 2005/09/29 89 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 130Ethylene Dibromide 2005/09/29 110 % 70 - 130Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 130o-Xylene 2005/09/29 115 % 70 - 130p+m-Xylene 2005/09/29 115 % 70 - 130Styrene 2005/09/29 110 % 70 - 130Tetrachloroethylene 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 130Toluene 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 130trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 130trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 74 % 70 - 130Trichloroethylene 2005/09/29 100 % 70 - 130Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 130Vinyl Chloride 2005/09/29 111 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 85 % 70 - 1301,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 86 % 70 - 1301,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 84 % 70 - 130Chlorobenzene 2005/09/29 97 % 70 - 1301,1,1-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 97 % 70 - 1301,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2005/09/29 88 % 70 - 1301,1,2-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 98 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 98 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 104 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 98 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloropropane 2005/09/29 99 % 70 - 1304-Bromofluorobenzene 2005/09/29 101 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/09/29 98 % 70 - 130Bromodichloromethane 2005/09/29 89 % 70 - 130Bromoform 2005/09/29 77 % 70 - 130Bromomethane 2005/09/29 87 % 70 - 130Carbon Tetrachloride 2005/09/29 90 % 70 - 130

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 12 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596061

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits831130 RMC Spiked Blank Chloroethane 2005/09/29 104 % 70 - 130

Chloroform 2005/09/29 98 % 70 - 130Chloromethane 2005/09/29 96 % 70 - 130cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 108 % 70 - 130cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 82 % 70 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 103 % 70 - 130D8-Toluene 2005/09/29 101 % 70 - 130Dibromochloromethane 2005/09/29 85 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2005/09/29 95 % 70 - 130Ethylene Dibromide 2005/09/29 104 % 70 - 130Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2005/09/29 104 % 70 - 130o-Xylene 2005/09/29 107 % 70 - 130p+m-Xylene 2005/09/29 106 % 70 - 130Styrene 2005/09/29 104 % 70 - 130Tetrachloroethylene 2005/09/29 101 % 70 - 130Toluene 2005/09/29 97 % 70 - 130trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 94 % 70 - 130trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 73 % 70 - 130Trichloroethylene 2005/09/29 105 % 70 - 130Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2005/09/29 98 % 70 - 130Vinyl Chloride 2005/09/29 101 % 70 - 130

Method Blank 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LChlorobenzene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,1-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=2 ug/L1,1-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=2 ug/L1,2-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,2-Dichloropropane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L4-Bromofluorobenzene 2005/09/29 84 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LBromodichloromethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LBromoform 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LBromomethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=8 ug/LCarbon Tetrachloride 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LChloroethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=8 ug/LChloroform 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LChloromethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=8 ug/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=2 ug/Lcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=2 ug/LD4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 99 % 70 - 130D8-Toluene 2005/09/29 101 % 70 - 130Dibromochloromethane 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LEthylbenzene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LEthylene Dibromide 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LMethylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2005/09/29 ND, DL=3 ug/Lo-Xylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/Lp+m-Xylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=2 ug/LStyrene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LTetrachloroethylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/LToluene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/Ltrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=2 ug/Ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 13 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596061

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits831130 RMC Method Blank Trichloroethylene 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L

Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2005/09/29 ND, DL=8 ug/LVinyl Chloride 2005/09/29 ND, DL=1 ug/L

RPD 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 NC % 401,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 NC % 401,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/09/29 NC % 40Chlorobenzene 2005/09/29 NC % 401,1,1-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 NC % 401,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2005/09/29 NC % 401,1,2-Trichloroethane 2005/09/29 NC % 401,1-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 NC % 401,1-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 NC % 401,2-Dichloroethane 2005/09/29 NC % 401,2-Dichloropropane 2005/09/29 NC % 40Benzene 2005/09/29 NC % 40Bromodichloromethane 2005/09/29 NC % 40Bromoform 2005/09/29 NC % 40Bromomethane 2005/09/29 NC % 40Carbon Tetrachloride 2005/09/29 NC % 40Chloroethane 2005/09/29 NC % 40Chloroform 2005/09/29 NC % 40Chloromethane 2005/09/29 NC % 40cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 NC % 40cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 NC % 40Dibromochloromethane 2005/09/29 NC % 40Ethylbenzene 2005/09/29 NC % 40Ethylene Dibromide 2005/09/29 NC % 40Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2005/09/29 NC % 40o-Xylene 2005/09/29 NC % 40p+m-Xylene 2005/09/29 NC % 40Styrene 2005/09/29 NC % 40Tetrachloroethylene 2005/09/29 NC % 40Toluene 2005/09/29 NC % 40trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/09/29 NC % 40trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/09/29 NC % 40Trichloroethylene 2005/09/29 NC % 40Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2005/09/29 NC % 40Vinyl Chloride 2005/09/29 NC % 40

831990 SSI MATRIX SPIKE Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/09/30 104 % 80 - 120QC STANDARD Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/09/30 103 % 80 - 120Spiked Blank Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/09/30 94 % 80 - 120Method Blank Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/09/30 ND, DL=0.013 ug/LRPD Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/09/30 NC % 25

834910 AMY MATRIX SPIKE Isobutylbenzene - Extractable 2005/10/05 93 % 30 - 130n-Dotriacontane - Extractable 2005/10/05 95 % 30 - 130>C10-C21 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/05 86 % 30 - 130>C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/05 80 % 30 - 130

Spiked Blank Isobutylbenzene - Extractable 2005/10/05 96 % 30 - 130n-Dotriacontane - Extractable 2005/10/05 102 % 30 - 130>C10-C21 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/05 87 % 30 - 130>C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/05 85 % 30 - 130

Method Blank Isobutylbenzene - Extractable 2005/10/05 96 % 30 - 130n-Dotriacontane - Extractable 2005/10/05 98 % 30 - 130>C10-C21 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.05 mg/L>C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.1 mg/L

RPD >C10-C21 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/05 NC % 40

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 14 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596061

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits834910 AMY RPD >C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/05 NC % 40835795 MSA MATRIX SPIKE Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/05 89 % 75 - 125

Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/05 91 % 75 - 125Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/05 92 % 75 - 125Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/05 112 % 75 - 125Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/05 103 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/05 102 % 75 - 125Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/05 97 % 75 - 125Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/05 106 % 75 - 125Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/05 100 % 75 - 125Dissolved Sulphur (S) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/05 96 % 75 - 125Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2005/10/05 91 % 75 - 125Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2005/10/05 91 % 75 - 125Dissolved Uranium (U) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/05 91 % 75 - 125Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2005/10/05 85 % 75 - 125

QC STANDARD Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/05 86 % 75 - 125Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/05 99 % 75 - 125Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/05 85 % 75 - 125Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/05 90 % 75 - 125Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/05 107 % 75 - 125Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/05 105 % 75 - 125Dissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/05 110 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/05 85 % 75 - 125Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/05 102 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/05 97 % 75 - 125Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2005/10/05 97 % 75 - 125Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/05 94 % 75 - 125Dissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/05 114 % 75 - 125Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2005/10/05 102 % 75 - 125Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/05 111 % 75 - 125Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/05 99 % 75 - 125Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/05 86 % 75 - 125Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/05 104 % 75 - 125Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/05 96 % 75 - 125Dissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/05 97 % 75 - 125Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/05 110 % 75 - 125Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2005/10/05 92 % 75 - 125

Spiked Blank Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/05 96 % 75 - 125Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/05 105 % 75 - 125Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/05 96 % 75 - 125Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/05 - % 75 - 125

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 15 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596061

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits835795 MSA Spiked Blank Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/05 107 % 75 - 125

Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/05 104 % 75 - 125Dissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/05 106 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/05 95 % 75 - 125Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/05 96 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/05 101 % 75 - 125Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2005/10/05 103 % 75 - 125Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2005/10/05 86 % 75 - 125Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/05 85 % 75 - 125Dissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/05 109 % 75 - 125Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2005/10/05 92 % 75 - 125Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/05 112 % 75 - 125Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/05 104 % 75 - 125Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2005/10/05 107 % 75 - 125Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/05 97 % 75 - 125Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/05 93 % 75 - 125Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/05 99 % 75 - 125Dissolved Sulphur (S) 2005/10/05 100 % 75 - 125Dissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/05 105 % 75 - 125Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2005/10/05 103 % 75 - 125Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2005/10/05 106 % 75 - 125Dissolved Uranium (U) 2005/10/05 111 % 75 - 125Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/05 107 % 75 - 125Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2005/10/05 99 % 75 - 125

Method Blank Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=5 ug/LDissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.4 ug/LDissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.6 ug/LDissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.4 ug/LDissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LDissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=100 ug/LDissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.3 ug/LDissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=1 ug/LDissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=1 ug/LDissolved Copper (Cu) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Iron (Fe) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=100 ug/LDissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=1 ug/LDissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=1 ug/LDissolved Manganese (Mn) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=4 ug/LDissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=4 ug/LDissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=3 ug/LDissolved Phosphorus (P) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=100 ug/LDissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=1 ug/LDissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Sulphur (S) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=4000 ug/LDissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.8 ug/LDissolved Tin (Sn) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=20 ug/LDissolved Titanium (Ti) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=3 ug/LDissolved Uranium (U) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LDissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Zinc (Zn) 2005/10/05 ND, DL=2 ug/L

RPD Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/05 3.0 % 25Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/05 0.8 % 25

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 16 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596061

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits835795 MSA RPD Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/05 NC % 25

Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/05 0.7 % 25Dissolved Sulphur (S) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Uranium (U) 2005/10/05 NC % 25Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/05 NC % 25

836589 MSK MATRIX SPIKE Isobutylbenzene - Volatile 2005/10/09 100 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/10/09 117 % 70 - 130Toluene 2005/10/09 113 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2005/10/09 117 % 70 - 130Xylene (Total) 2005/10/09 116 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank Isobutylbenzene - Volatile 2005/10/09 101 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/10/09 113 % 70 - 130Toluene 2005/10/09 113 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2005/10/09 113 % 70 - 130Xylene (Total) 2005/10/09 113 % 70 - 130

Method Blank Isobutylbenzene - Volatile 2005/10/09 95 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/10/09 ND, DL=0.001 mg/LToluene 2005/10/09 ND, DL=0.001 mg/LEthylbenzene 2005/10/09 ND, DL=0.001 mg/LXylene (Total) 2005/10/09 ND, DL=0.002 mg/LC6 - C10 (less BTEX) 2005/10/09 ND, DL=0.01 mg/L

RPD Benzene 2005/10/09 NC % 40Toluene 2005/10/09 NC % 40Ethylbenzene 2005/10/09 NC % 40Xylene (Total) 2005/10/09 NC % 40C6 - C10 (less BTEX) 2005/10/09 NC % 40

837578 AAT Spiked Blank 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 2005/10/07 79 % 10 - 1302-Fluorobiphenyl 2005/10/07 72 % 30 - 1302-Fluorophenol 2005/10/07 45 % 10 - 130D14-Terphenyl (FS) 2005/10/07 93 % 30 - 130D5-Nitrobenzene 2005/10/07 61 % 30 - 130D5-Phenol 2005/10/07 34 % 10 - 130Acenaphthene 2005/10/07 77 % 55 - 130

RPD Acenaphthene 2005/10/07 3.1 % 40Spiked Blank Acenaphthylene 2005/10/07 76 % 46 - 130RPD Acenaphthylene 2005/10/07 2.2 % 40Spiked Blank Acridine 2005/10/07 90 % 30 - 130RPD Acridine 2005/10/07 8.9 % 40Spiked Blank Anthracene 2005/10/07 80 % 48 - 128RPD Anthracene 2005/10/07 8.4 % 40Spiked Blank Benzo(a)anthracene 2005/10/07 83 % 30 - 130

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 17 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596061

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits837578 AAT RPD Benzo(a)anthracene 2005/10/07 10.0 % 40

Spiked Blank Benzo(a)pyrene 2005/10/07 84 % 31 - 130RPD Benzo(a)pyrene 2005/10/07 10.2 % 40Spiked Blank Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene 2005/10/07 84 % 30 - 130RPD Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene 2005/10/07 8.4 % 40Spiked Blank Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2005/10/07 77 % 40 - 130RPD Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2005/10/07 11.2 % 40Spiked Blank Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2005/10/07 87 % 30 - 130RPD Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2005/10/07 3.9 % 40Spiked Blank 1-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/07 69 % 40 - 130RPD 1-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/07 0.07 % 40Spiked Blank 2-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/07 70 % 34 - 119RPD 2-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/07 1.6 % 40Spiked Blank Chrysene 2005/10/07 81 % 44 - 130RPD Chrysene 2005/10/07 10.1 % 40Spiked Blank Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2005/10/07 79 % 30 - 130RPD Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2005/10/07 10.2 % 40Spiked Blank Fluoranthene 2005/10/07 81 % 26 - 137RPD Fluoranthene 2005/10/07 9.3 % 40Spiked Blank Fluorene 2005/10/07 81 % 50 - 122RPD Fluorene 2005/10/07 5.4 % 40Spiked Blank Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2005/10/07 78 % 30 - 130RPD Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2005/10/07 10.3 % 40Spiked Blank 1-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/07 70 % 40 - 130RPD 1-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/07 1.3 % 40Spiked Blank 2-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/07 68 % 40 - 130RPD 2-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/07 1.2 % 40Spiked Blank Naphthalene 2005/10/07 58 % 35 - 120RPD Naphthalene 2005/10/07 4.6 % 40Spiked Blank Phenanthrene 2005/10/07 81 % 54 - 120RPD Phenanthrene 2005/10/07 8.4 % 40Spiked Blank Pyrene 2005/10/07 92 % 66 - 132RPD Pyrene 2005/10/07 9.1 % 40Spiked Blank Quinoline 2005/10/07 85 % 30 - 130RPD Quinoline 2005/10/07 9.7 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 52 % 30 - 112RPD 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 8.1 % 40Spiked Blank 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 47 % 30 - 130RPD 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 8.4 % 40Spiked Blank 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 50 % 37 - 106RPD 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 7.7 % 40Spiked Blank Hexachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 80 % 30 - 130RPD Hexachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 8.4 % 40Spiked Blank Pentachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 67 % 40 - 130RPD Pentachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 5.9 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 50 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 4.3 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 58 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 1.7 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 52 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 6.0 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 49 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 8.1 % 40Spiked Blank 1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 54 % 40 - 130RPD 1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 9.3 % 40Spiked Blank 2-Chlorophenol 2005/10/07 70 % 10 - 130

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 18 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596061

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits837578 AAT RPD 2-Chlorophenol 2005/10/07 6.1 % 40

Spiked Blank 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 2005/10/07 83 % 10 - 130RPD 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 2005/10/07 8.6 % 40Spiked Blank m/p-Cresol 2005/10/07 71 % 10 - 130RPD m/p-Cresol 2005/10/07 3.6 % 40Spiked Blank o-Cresol 2005/10/07 71 % 10 - 130RPD o-Cresol 2005/10/07 4.4 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 58 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 3.1 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 68 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 4.5 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 72 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 5.8 % 40Spiked Blank 2,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 69 % 10 - 130RPD 2,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 2.7 % 40Spiked Blank 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 65 % 10 - 130RPD 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 3.1 % 40Spiked Blank 3,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 79 % 10 - 130RPD 3,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 7.6 % 40Spiked Blank 3,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 97 % 10 - 130RPD 3,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 8.8 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2005/10/07 64 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2005/10/07 10.1 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4-Dinitrophenol 2005/10/07 55 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4-Dinitrophenol 2005/10/07 27.2 % 40Spiked Blank 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2005/10/07 85 % 10 - 130RPD 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2005/10/07 20.7 % 40Spiked Blank 2-Nitrophenol 2005/10/07 64 % 10 - 130RPD 2-Nitrophenol 2005/10/07 8.1 % 40Spiked Blank 4-Nitrophenol 2005/10/07 38 % 10 - 130RPD 4-Nitrophenol 2005/10/07 7.8 % 40Spiked Blank Pentachlorophenol 2005/10/07 104 % 10 - 130RPD Pentachlorophenol 2005/10/07 21.1 % 40Spiked Blank Phenol 2005/10/07 39 % 10 - 130RPD Phenol 2005/10/07 5.8 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/07 90 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/07 8.8 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/07 91 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/07 6.8 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/07 84 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/07 12.9 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,4-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 76 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,4-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 1.3 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 67 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 7.8 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 76 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 4.6 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 81 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 4.6 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 76 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 5.5 % 40Spiked Blank 3,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 107 % 10 - 130RPD 3,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 11.9 % 40Spiked Blank Benzyl butyl phthalate 2005/10/07 92 % 30 - 130RPD Benzyl butyl phthalate 2005/10/07 8.9 % 40Spiked Blank Biphenyl 2005/10/07 74 % 40 - 130

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 19 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596061

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits837578 AAT RPD Biphenyl 2005/10/07 0.5 % 40

Spiked Blank Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 2005/10/07 66 % 42 - 126RPD Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 2005/10/07 6.0 % 40Spiked Blank Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 2005/10/07 71 % 49 - 130RPD Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 2005/10/07 2.2 % 40Spiked Blank Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 2005/10/07 69 % 42 - 102RPD Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 2005/10/07 4.0 % 40Spiked Blank Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 2005/10/07 89 % 57 - 167RPD Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 2005/10/07 9.5 % 40Spiked Blank 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/07 76 % 53 - 127RPD 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/07 8.4 % 40Spiked Blank p-Chloroaniline 2005/10/07 NS % 30 - 130RPD p-Chloroaniline 2005/10/07 NC % 40Spiked Blank 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/07 78 % 38 - 130RPD 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/07 5.7 % 40Spiked Blank 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2005/10/07 37 % 30 - 130RPD 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2005/10/07 4.0 % 40Spiked Blank Diethyl phthalate 2005/10/07 86 % 30 - 114RPD Diethyl phthalate 2005/10/07 9.6 % 40Spiked Blank Dimethyl phthalate 2005/10/07 83 % 30 - 112RPD Dimethyl phthalate 2005/10/07 9.0 % 40Spiked Blank Di-N-butyl phthalate 2005/10/07 86 % 30 - 130RPD Di-N-butyl phthalate 2005/10/07 10.4 % 40Spiked Blank Di-N-octyl phthalate 2005/10/07 96 % 30 - 130RPD Di-N-octyl phthalate 2005/10/07 10.0 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/07 80 % 47 - 127RPD 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/07 11.1 % 40Spiked Blank 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/07 84 % 30 - 130RPD 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/07 8.9 % 40Spiked Blank Diphenyl Ether 2005/10/07 69 % 40 - 130RPD Diphenyl Ether 2005/10/07 1.4 % 40Spiked Blank Hexachlorobutadiene 2005/10/07 38 % 30 - 116RPD Hexachlorobutadiene 2005/10/07 12.1 % 40Spiked Blank Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2005/10/07 6.9 ( 1 ) % 30 - 130RPD Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2005/10/07 NC % 40Spiked Blank Hexachloroethane 2005/10/07 73 % 30 - 130RPD Hexachloroethane 2005/10/07 14.7 % 40Spiked Blank Isophorone 2005/10/07 73 % 35 - 150RPD Isophorone 2005/10/07 4.2 % 40Spiked Blank Nitrobenzene 2005/10/07 62 % 39 - 105RPD Nitrobenzene 2005/10/07 7.0 % 40Spiked Blank Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine 2005/10/07 67 % 40 - 130RPD Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine 2005/10/07 8.6 % 40Spiked Blank N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 2005/10/07 64 % 30 - 130RPD N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 2005/10/07 4.7 % 40Method Blank 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 2005/10/07 67 % 10 - 130

2-Fluorobiphenyl 2005/10/07 48 % 30 - 1302-Fluorophenol 2005/10/07 37 % 10 - 130D14-Terphenyl (FS) 2005/10/07 87 % 30 - 130D5-Nitrobenzene 2005/10/07 40 % 30 - 130D5-Phenol 2005/10/07 24 % 10 - 130Acenaphthene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LAcenaphthylene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LAcridine 2005/10/07 ND, DL=2 ug/LAnthracene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LBenzo(a)anthracene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 20 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596061

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits837578 AAT Method Blank Benzo(a)pyrene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L

Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L1-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=1 ug/L2-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LChrysene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LDibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LFluoranthene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LFluorene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L1-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L2-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LNaphthalene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LPhenanthrene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LPyrene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LQuinoline 2005/10/07 ND, DL=2 ug/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LHexachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LPentachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2-Chlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.3 ug/L4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/Lm/p-Cresol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/Lo-Cresol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.3 ug/L2,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,6-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L3,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L3,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4-Dimethylphenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4-Dinitrophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=2 ug/L4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=2 ug/L2-Nitrophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L4-Nitrophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=1 ug/LPentachlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=1 ug/LPhenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.4 ug/L2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,4-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L3,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBenzyl butyl phthalate 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBiphenyl 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 21 of 22

Earth TechAttention: Don Shosky Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596061

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits837578 AAT Method Blank Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 2005/10/07 ND, DL=2 ug/L4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.3 ug/Lp-Chloroaniline 2005/10/07 ND, DL=1 ug/L4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LDiethyl phthalate 2005/10/07 ND, DL=1 ug/LDimethyl phthalate 2005/10/07 ND, DL=1 ug/LDi-N-butyl phthalate 2005/10/07 ND, DL=2 ug/LDi-N-octyl phthalate 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.8 ug/L2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,6-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LDiphenyl Ether 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.3 ug/LHexachlorobutadiene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.4 ug/LHexachlorocyclopentadiene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=2 ug/LHexachloroethane 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LIsophorone 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LNitrobenzene 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LNitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine 2005/10/07 ND, DL=1 ug/LN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L

840434 TMD MATRIX SPIKE Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2005/10/12 127 % 70 - 130Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2005/10/12 119 % 70 - 130Dissolved Potassium (K) 2005/10/12 - % 70 - 130Dissolved Silicon (Si) 2005/10/12 - % 70 - 130Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/12 - % 70 - 130

QC STANDARD Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2005/10/12 102 % 70 - 130Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2005/10/12 107 % 70 - 130Dissolved Potassium (K) 2005/10/12 77 % 70 - 130Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/12 98 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2005/10/12 95 % 70 - 130Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2005/10/12 93 % 70 - 130Dissolved Potassium (K) 2005/10/12 77 % 70 - 130Dissolved Silicon (Si) 2005/10/12 109 % 70 - 130Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/12 73 % 70 - 130

Method Blank Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2005/10/12 0.2, DL=0.2 mg/LDissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2005/10/12 0.1, DL=0.1 mg/LDissolved Potassium (K) 2005/10/12 ND, DL=1 mg/LDissolved Silicon (Si) 2005/10/12 ND, DL=0.5 mg/LDissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/12 ND, DL=1 mg/L

RPD Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/12 1 % 30

ND = Not detectedNC = Non-calculableRPD = Relative Percent DifferenceQC Standard = Quality Control StandardSPIKE = Fortified sample

( 1 ) Please note that the recovery of some compounds are outside control limits however the overall quality control for this analysis meets ouracceptability criteria.

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 22 of 22

Your Project #: 85989 Site: COKE OVENS

Attention: Bruce NobleEarth TechUSE 8566 for Campobello work105 Commerce Valley Dr WMarkham, ONL3T 7W3

Report Date: 2005/10/26

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

MAXXAM JOB #: A596828Received: 2005/09/29, 14:18

Sample Matrix: Water# Samples Received: 2

Date Date MethodAnalyses Quantity Extracted Analyzed Laboratory Method ReferenceABN Compounds in Water by GC/MS ( 1 , 3 ) 1 2005/10/08 2005/10/11 Ont SOP-0124 EPA 8270 (modified) TEH in Water (PIRI) ( 3 ) 1 2005/10/20 2005/10/21 METH1007 Based on Atl. PIRI Mercury - Total (CVAA,LL) ( 2 ) 1 N/A 2005/10/07 3425_1_2 Based on EPA245.1 Elements by ICPMS - dissolved 2 N/A 2005/10/15 METH2012 Based on EPA6020A Dis.metals in water ICP-OES 2 N/A 2005/10/18 METH2049 Based on EPA200.7 VPH in Water (PIRI) ( 2 , 3 ) 1 2005/10/07 2005/10/11 9120_1_5 Based on Atl. PIRI Volatile Organic Compounds in Water ( 2 ) 1 2005/10/03 2005/10/04 9615_1_3 Based on EPA624

(1) This test was performed by Maxxam Analytics Mississauga(2) This test was performed by Bedford(3) SCC/CAEAL

MAXXAM ANALYTICS INC.

NATALIE BURKESr. Project Manager

NBU/nbuencl.

Validated by :MICHELLE MOMBOURQUETTE

Total cover pages: 1

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 1 of 23

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596828 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/26 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

ATLANTIC MUST IN WATER - PIRI TIER I (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 9 5 0 2Sampling Date 2005/09/29 Units PT-3 RDL QC Batch

TPH COMPOUNDS

Benzene mg/L ND 0.001 837546

Toluene mg/L ND 0.001 837546

Ethylbenzene mg/L ND 0.001 837546

Xylene (Total) mg/L ND 0.002 837546

C6 - C10 (less BTEX) mg/L ND 0.01 837546

Surrogate Recovery (%)

Isobutylbenzene - Volatile % 85 837546

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 2 of 23

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596828 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/26 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

ATLANTIC VOC IN WATER PKG. (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 9 5 0 2Sampling Date 2005/09/29 Units PT-3 RDL QC Batch

CHLOROBENZENES

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 833737

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1 833737

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 1 833737

Chlorobenzene ug/L ND 1 833737

VOLATILES

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ug/L ND 1 833737

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ug/L ND 1 833737

1,1,2-Trichloroethane ug/L ND 1 833737

1,1-Dichloroethane ug/L ND 2 833737

1,1-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND 2 833737

1,2-Dichloroethane ug/L ND 1 833737

1,2-Dichloropropane ug/L ND 1 833737

Benzene ug/L ND 1 833737

Bromodichloromethane ug/L ND 1 833737

Bromoform ug/L ND 1 833737

Bromomethane ug/L ND 8 833737

Carbon Tetrachloride ug/L ND 1 833737

Chloroethane ug/L ND 8 833737

Chloroform ug/L ND 1 833737

Chloromethane ug/L ND 8 833737

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND 2 833737

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND 2 833737

Dibromochloromethane ug/L ND 1 833737

Ethylbenzene ug/L ND 1 833737

Ethylene Dibromide ug/L ND 1 833737

Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) ug/L ND 3 833737

o-Xylene ug/L ND 1 833737

p+m-Xylene ug/L ND 2 833737

Styrene ug/L ND 1 833737

Tetrachloroethylene ug/L ND 1 833737

Toluene ug/L ND 1 833737

trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ug/L ND 2 833737

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 3 of 23

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596828 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/26 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

ATLANTIC VOC IN WATER PKG. (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 9 5 0 2Sampling Date 2005/09/29 Units PT-3 RDL QC Batch

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ug/L ND 1 833737

Trichloroethylene ug/L ND 1 833737

Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) ug/L ND 8 833737

Vinyl Chloride ug/L ND 1 833737

Surrogate Recovery (%)

4-Bromofluorobenzene % 86 833737

D4-1,2-Dichloroethane % 103 833737

D8-Toluene % 98 833737

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 4 of 23

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596828 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/26 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

DISSOLVED METAL SCAN (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 9 5 0 2 I 4 9 6 3 5Sampling Date 2005/09/29 2005/09/29 Units PT-3 TRIP BLANK RDL QC Batch

Elements (ICP-MS)

Dissolved Aluminum (Al) ug/L ND ND 5 843064

Dissolved Antimony (Sb) ug/L ND ND 0.4 843064

Dissolved Arsenic (As) ug/L 0.7 ND 0.6 843064

Dissolved Barium (Ba) ug/L 29 ND 0.4 843064

Dissolved Beryllium (Be) ug/L ND ND 0.5 843064

Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) ug/L ND ND 2 843064

Dissolved Boron (B) ug/L ND ND 100 843064

Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) ug/L ND ND 0.3 843064

Dissolved Chromium (Cr) ug/L ND ND 1 843064

Dissolved Cobalt (Co) ug/L ND ND 1 843064

Dissolved Copper (Cu) ug/L ND 2 2 843064

Dissolved Iron (Fe) ug/L ND ND 100 843064

Dissolved Lead (Pb) ug/L ND ND 1 843064

Dissolved Lithium (Li) ug/L 8 ND 1 843064

Dissolved Manganese (Mn) ug/L 130 ND 4 843064

Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) ug/L ND ND 4 843064

Dissolved Nickel (Ni) ug/L ND ND 3 843064

Dissolved Phosphorus (P) ug/L ND ND 100 843064

Dissolved Selenium (Se) ug/L ND ND 1 843064

Dissolved Silver (Ag) ug/L ND ND 2 843064

Dissolved Strontium (Sr) ug/L 300 ND 2 843064

Dissolved Sulphur (S) ug/L 11000 ND 4000 843064

Dissolved Thallium (Tl) ug/L ND ND 0.8 843064

Dissolved Tin (Sn) ug/L ND ND 20 843064

Dissolved Titanium (Ti) ug/L ND ND 3 843064

Dissolved Uranium (U) ug/L ND ND 0.2 843064

Dissolved Vanadium (V) ug/L ND ND 2 843064

Dissolved Zinc (Zn) ug/L ND 8 2 843064

Elements (ICP-OES)

Dissolved Calcium (Ca) mg/L 20 ND 0.1 844700

Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) mg/L 2.4 0.1 0.1 844700

Dissolved Potassium (K) mg/L 2 ND 1 844700

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 5 of 23

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596828 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/26 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

DISSOLVED METAL SCAN (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 9 5 0 2 I 4 9 6 3 5Sampling Date 2005/09/29 2005/09/29 Units PT-3 TRIP BLANK RDL QC Batch

Dissolved Silicon (Si) mg/L 5.4 ND 0.5 844700

Dissolved Sodium (Na) mg/L 69 ND 1 844700

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 6 of 23

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596828 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/26 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

EXTRACTABLE HYDROCARBONS (PIRI)

Maxxam ID I 4 9 5 0 2Sampling Date 2005/09/29 Units PT-3 RDL QC Batch

TPH COMPOUNDS

>C10-C21 Hydrocarbons mg/L ND 0.2 847060

>C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons mg/L ND 0.5 847060

Surrogate Recovery (%)

Isobutylbenzene - Extractable % 100 847060

n-Dotriacontane - Extractable % 99 847060

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 7 of 23

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596828 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/26 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

ELEMENTS BY ATOMIC SPECTROSCOPY (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 9 5 0 2Sampling Date 2005/09/29 Units PT-3 RDL QC Batch

ELEMENTS

Total Mercury (Hg) ug/L ND 0.01 837827

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 8 of 23

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596828 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/26 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 9 5 0 2Sampling Date 2005/09/29 Units PT-3 RDL QC Batch

SEMIVOLATILES

Acenaphthene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Acenaphthylene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Acridine ug/L ND 2 838501

Anthracene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Benzo(a)anthracene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Benzo(a)pyrene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

1-Chloronaphthalene ug/L ND 1 838501

2-Chloronaphthalene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Chrysene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Fluoranthene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Fluorene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

1-Methylnaphthalene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

2-Methylnaphthalene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Naphthalene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Phenanthrene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Pyrene ug/L ND 0.2 838501

Quinoline ug/L ND 2 838501

1,2-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

1,3-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

1,4-Dichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Hexachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Pentachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 9 of 23

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596828 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/26 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 9 5 0 2Sampling Date 2005/09/29 Units PT-3 RDL QC Batch

2-Chlorophenol ug/L ND 0.3 838501

4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

m/p-Cresol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

o-Cresol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

2,3-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

2,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.3 838501

2,5-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

2,6-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

3,4-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

3,5-Dichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

2,4-Dimethylphenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

2,4-Dinitrophenol ug/L ND 2 838501

4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol ug/L ND 2 838501

2-Nitrophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

4-Nitrophenol ug/L ND 1 838501

Pentachlorophenol ug/L ND 1 838501

Phenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L ND 0.4 838501

2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

2,3,4-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

2,3,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

2,3,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

3,4,5-Trichlorophenol ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Benzyl butyl phthalate ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Biphenyl ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ug/L ND 2 838501

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 10 of 23

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596828 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/26 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (WATER)

Maxxam ID I 4 9 5 0 2Sampling Date 2005/09/29 Units PT-3 RDL QC Batch

4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ug/L ND 0.3 838501

p-Chloroaniline ug/L ND 1 838501

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ug/L ND 0.5 838501

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Diethyl phthalate ug/L ND 1 838501

Dimethyl phthalate ug/L ND 1 838501

Di-N-butyl phthalate ug/L ND 2 838501

Di-N-octyl phthalate ug/L ND 0.8 838501

2,4-Dinitrotoluene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

2,6-Dinitrotoluene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Diphenyl Ether ug/L ND 0.3 838501

Hexachlorobutadiene ug/L ND 0.4 838501

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ug/L ND 2 838501

Hexachloroethane ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Isophorone ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Nitrobenzene ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine ug/L ND 1 838501

N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine ug/L ND 0.5 838501

Surrogate Recovery (%)

2,4,6-Tribromophenol % 79 838501

2-Fluorobiphenyl % 76 838501

2-Fluorophenol % 46 838501

D14-Terphenyl (FS) % 112 838501

D5-Nitrobenzene % 67 838501

D5-Phenol % 34 838501

ND = Not detectedRDL = Reportable Detection LimitQC Batch = Quality Control Batch

Page 11 of 23

Earth TechMaxxam Job #: A596828 Client Project #: 85989Report Date: 2005/10/26 Project name: COKE OVENS

Sampler Initials:

SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GC-MS (WATER)

ABN Compounds in Water by GC/MS: ABN Analysis:The recovery for indole and hexachlorocyclopentadiene from the spiked blank and its dulplicate were below the lower control limit. This mayrepresent a low bias in some results for these specific parameters.The recovery for 3,4,5-trichlorophenol from the spike blank's duplicate was above the upper control limit. this may represent a high bias in someresults for this specific parameter.

Results relate only to the items tested.

Page 12 of 23

Earth TechAttention: Bruce Noble Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance ReportMaxxam Job Number: KA596828

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits833737 RMC MATRIX SPIKE

[I49502-01] 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 84 % 70 - 1301,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 84 % 70 - 1301,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 79 % 70 - 130Chlorobenzene 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 1301,1,1-Trichloroethane 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 1301,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2005/10/04 89 % 70 - 1301,1,2-Trichloroethane 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethane 2005/10/04 105 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethylene 2005/10/04 111 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloroethane 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloropropane 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 1304-Bromofluorobenzene 2005/10/04 102 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 130Bromodichloromethane 2005/10/04 89 % 70 - 130Bromoform 2005/10/04 79 % 70 - 130Bromomethane 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 130Carbon Tetrachloride 2005/10/04 95 % 70 - 130Chloroethane 2005/10/04 111 % 70 - 130Chloroform 2005/10/04 105 % 70 - 130Chloromethane 2005/10/04 116 % 70 - 130cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/10/04 110 % 70 - 130cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/10/04 89 % 70 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2005/10/04 102 % 70 - 130D8-Toluene 2005/10/04 98 % 70 - 130Dibromochloromethane 2005/10/04 84 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 130Ethylene Dibromide 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 130Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2005/10/04 105 % 70 - 130o-Xylene 2005/10/04 105 % 70 - 130p+m-Xylene 2005/10/04 105 % 70 - 130Styrene 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 130Tetrachloroethylene 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 130Toluene 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 130trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/10/04 105 % 70 - 130trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/10/04 79 % 70 - 130Trichloroethylene 2005/10/04 105 % 70 - 130Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2005/10/04 111 % 70 - 130Vinyl Chloride 2005/10/04 116 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 84 % 70 - 1301,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 85 % 70 - 1301,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 81 % 70 - 130Chlorobenzene 2005/10/04 95 % 70 - 1301,1,1-Trichloroethane 2005/10/04 99 % 70 - 1301,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2005/10/04 77 % 70 - 1301,1,2-Trichloroethane 2005/10/04 97 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethane 2005/10/04 98 % 70 - 1301,1-Dichloroethylene 2005/10/04 106 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloroethane 2005/10/04 94 % 70 - 1301,2-Dichloropropane 2005/10/04 97 % 70 - 1304-Bromofluorobenzene 2005/10/04 103 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/10/04 96 % 70 - 130Bromodichloromethane 2005/10/04 85 % 70 - 130Bromoform 2005/10/04 78 % 70 - 130Bromomethane 2005/10/04 92 % 70 - 130Carbon Tetrachloride 2005/10/04 89 % 70 - 130

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 13 of 23

Earth TechAttention: Bruce Noble Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596828

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits833737 RMC Spiked Blank Chloroethane 2005/10/04 102 % 70 - 130

Chloroform 2005/10/04 97 % 70 - 130Chloromethane 2005/10/04 110 % 70 - 130cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/10/04 107 % 70 - 130cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/10/04 93 % 70 - 130D4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2005/10/04 101 % 70 - 130D8-Toluene 2005/10/04 99 % 70 - 130Dibromochloromethane 2005/10/04 84 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2005/10/04 93 % 70 - 130Ethylene Dibromide 2005/10/04 101 % 70 - 130Methylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2005/10/04 101 % 70 - 130o-Xylene 2005/10/04 104 % 70 - 130p+m-Xylene 2005/10/04 102 % 70 - 130Styrene 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 130Tetrachloroethylene 2005/10/04 100 % 70 - 130Toluene 2005/10/04 92 % 70 - 130trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/10/04 99 % 70 - 130trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/10/04 83 % 70 - 130Trichloroethylene 2005/10/04 105 % 70 - 130Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2005/10/04 103 % 70 - 130Vinyl Chloride 2005/10/04 114 % 70 - 130

Method Blank 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LChlorobenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,1-Dichloroethane 2005/10/04 ND, DL=2 ug/L1,1-Dichloroethylene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=2 ug/L1,2-Dichloroethane 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/L1,2-Dichloropropane 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/L4-Bromofluorobenzene 2005/10/04 87 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LBromodichloromethane 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LBromoform 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LBromomethane 2005/10/04 ND, DL=8 ug/LCarbon Tetrachloride 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LChloroethane 2005/10/04 ND, DL=8 ug/LChloroform 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LChloromethane 2005/10/04 ND, DL=8 ug/Lcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=2 ug/Lcis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=2 ug/LD4-1,2-Dichloroethane 2005/10/04 101 % 70 - 130D8-Toluene 2005/10/04 96 % 70 - 130Dibromochloromethane 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LEthylbenzene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LEthylene Dibromide 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LMethylene Chloride(Dichloromethane) 2005/10/04 ND, DL=3 ug/Lo-Xylene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/Lp+m-Xylene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=2 ug/LStyrene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LTetrachloroethylene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/LToluene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/Ltrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=2 ug/Ltrans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/L

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 14 of 23

Earth TechAttention: Bruce Noble Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596828

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits833737 RMC Method Blank Trichloroethylene 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/L

Trichlorofluoromethane (FREON 11) 2005/10/04 ND, DL=8 ug/LVinyl Chloride 2005/10/04 ND, DL=1 ug/L

837546 MSK MATRIX SPIKE Isobutylbenzene - Volatile 2005/10/11 82 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/10/11 109 % 70 - 130Toluene 2005/10/11 109 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2005/10/11 109 % 70 - 130Xylene (Total) 2005/10/11 112 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank Isobutylbenzene - Volatile 2005/10/11 79 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/10/11 91 % 70 - 130Toluene 2005/10/11 87 % 70 - 130Ethylbenzene 2005/10/11 87 % 70 - 130Xylene (Total) 2005/10/11 90 % 70 - 130

Method Blank Isobutylbenzene - Volatile 2005/10/11 95 % 70 - 130Benzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.001 mg/LToluene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.001 mg/LEthylbenzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.001 mg/LXylene (Total) 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.002 mg/LC6 - C10 (less BTEX) 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.01 mg/L

RPD Benzene 2005/10/11 NC % 40Toluene 2005/10/11 NC % 40Ethylbenzene 2005/10/11 NC % 40Xylene (Total) 2005/10/11 NC % 40C6 - C10 (less BTEX) 2005/10/11 NC % 40

837827 SSI MATRIX SPIKE Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/10/07 116 % 80 - 120QC STANDARD Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/10/07 108 % 80 - 120Spiked Blank Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/10/07 95 % 80 - 120Method Blank Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/10/07 ND, DL=0.013 ug/LRPD Total Mercury (Hg) 2005/10/07 NC % 25

838501 AAT Spiked Blank 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 2005/10/11 79 % 10 - 1302-Fluorobiphenyl 2005/10/11 72 % 30 - 1302-Fluorophenol 2005/10/11 47 % 10 - 130D14-Terphenyl (FS) 2005/10/11 89 % 30 - 130D5-Nitrobenzene 2005/10/11 63 % 30 - 130D5-Phenol 2005/10/11 35 % 10 - 130Acenaphthene 2005/10/11 74 % 55 - 130

RPD Acenaphthene 2005/10/11 3.5 % 40Spiked Blank Acenaphthylene 2005/10/11 73 % 46 - 130RPD Acenaphthylene 2005/10/11 2.0 % 40Spiked Blank Acridine 2005/10/11 92 % 30 - 130RPD Acridine 2005/10/11 9.0 % 40Spiked Blank Anthracene 2005/10/11 79 % 48 - 128RPD Anthracene 2005/10/11 10.3 % 40Spiked Blank Benzo(a)anthracene 2005/10/11 84 % 30 - 130RPD Benzo(a)anthracene 2005/10/11 8.2 % 40Spiked Blank Benzo(a)pyrene 2005/10/11 84 % 31 - 130RPD Benzo(a)pyrene 2005/10/11 11.6 % 40Spiked Blank Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene 2005/10/11 82 % 30 - 130RPD Benzo(b/j)fluoranthene 2005/10/11 14.2 % 40Spiked Blank Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2005/10/11 82 % 40 - 130RPD Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 2005/10/11 10.3 % 40Spiked Blank Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2005/10/11 80 % 30 - 130RPD Benzo(k)fluoranthene 2005/10/11 14.6 % 40Spiked Blank 1-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/11 70 % 40 - 130RPD 1-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/11 0.3 % 40Spiked Blank 2-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/11 71 % 34 - 119

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 15 of 23

Earth TechAttention: Bruce Noble Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596828

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits838501 AAT RPD 2-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/11 0.6 % 40

Spiked Blank Chrysene 2005/10/11 83 % 44 - 130RPD Chrysene 2005/10/11 8.7 % 40Spiked Blank Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2005/10/11 83 % 30 - 130RPD Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2005/10/11 10.6 % 40Spiked Blank Fluoranthene 2005/10/11 85 % 26 - 137RPD Fluoranthene 2005/10/11 10.3 % 40Spiked Blank Fluorene 2005/10/11 79 % 50 - 122RPD Fluorene 2005/10/11 5.6 % 40Spiked Blank Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2005/10/11 83 % 30 - 130RPD Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2005/10/11 10.1 % 40Spiked Blank 1-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/11 69 % 40 - 130RPD 1-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/11 0.6 % 40Spiked Blank 2-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/11 68 % 40 - 130RPD 2-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/11 0.7 % 40Spiked Blank Naphthalene 2005/10/11 59 % 35 - 120RPD Naphthalene 2005/10/11 3.5 % 40Spiked Blank Phenanthrene 2005/10/11 81 % 54 - 120RPD Phenanthrene 2005/10/11 8.8 % 40Spiked Blank Pyrene 2005/10/11 88 % 66 - 132RPD Pyrene 2005/10/11 9.7 % 40Spiked Blank Quinoline 2005/10/11 86 % 30 - 130RPD Quinoline 2005/10/11 8.8 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 52 % 30 - 112RPD 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 9.9 % 40Spiked Blank 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 48 % 30 - 130RPD 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 8.5 % 40Spiked Blank 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 50 % 37 - 106RPD 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 8.4 % 40Spiked Blank Hexachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 82 % 30 - 130RPD Hexachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 8.5 % 40Spiked Blank Pentachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 67 % 40 - 130RPD Pentachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 3.9 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 52 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 3.5 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 55 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 2.9 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 52 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 4.7 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 48 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 5.9 % 40Spiked Blank 1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 53 % 40 - 130RPD 1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 8.1 % 40Spiked Blank 2-Chlorophenol 2005/10/11 70 % 10 - 130RPD 2-Chlorophenol 2005/10/11 7.5 % 40Spiked Blank 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 2005/10/11 87 % 10 - 130RPD 4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 2005/10/11 7.1 % 40Spiked Blank m/p-Cresol 2005/10/11 72 % 10 - 130RPD m/p-Cresol 2005/10/11 7.1 % 40Spiked Blank o-Cresol 2005/10/11 73 % 10 - 130RPD o-Cresol 2005/10/11 5.2 % 40Spiked Blank 1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 58 % 40 - 130RPD 1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 3.1 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 72 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 1.5 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 71 % 10 - 130

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 16 of 23

Earth TechAttention: Bruce Noble Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596828

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits838501 AAT RPD 2,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 4.9 % 40

Spiked Blank 2,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 73 % 10 - 130RPD 2,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 4.9 % 40Spiked Blank 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 66 % 10 - 130RPD 2,6-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 3.3 % 40Spiked Blank 3,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 79 % 10 - 130RPD 3,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 10.6 % 40Spiked Blank 3,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 101 % 10 - 130RPD 3,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 8.3 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2005/10/11 61 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4-Dimethylphenol 2005/10/11 6.7 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4-Dinitrophenol 2005/10/11 89 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4-Dinitrophenol 2005/10/11 10.5 % 40Spiked Blank 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2005/10/11 102 % 10 - 130RPD 4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2005/10/11 9.6 % 40Spiked Blank 2-Nitrophenol 2005/10/11 69 % 10 - 130RPD 2-Nitrophenol 2005/10/11 5.7 % 40Spiked Blank 4-Nitrophenol 2005/10/11 39 % 10 - 130RPD 4-Nitrophenol 2005/10/11 16.4 % 40Spiked Blank Pentachlorophenol 2005/10/11 109 % 10 - 130RPD Pentachlorophenol 2005/10/11 17.3 % 40Spiked Blank Phenol 2005/10/11 40 % 10 - 130RPD Phenol 2005/10/11 7.5 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/11 85 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/11 13.2 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/11 77 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/11 11.8 % 40

2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/11 29.0 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/11 76 % 10 - 130

2,3,4-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 74 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,4-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 10.4 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 68 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 6.9 % 40Spiked Blank 2,3,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 76 % 10 - 130RPD 2,3,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 5.7 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 80 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 8.8 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 78 % 10 - 130RPD 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 4.4 % 40Spiked Blank 3,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 120 % 10 - 130RPD 3,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 15.2 % 40Spiked Blank Benzyl butyl phthalate 2005/10/11 91 % 30 - 130RPD Benzyl butyl phthalate 2005/10/11 9.4 % 40

Biphenyl 2005/10/11 0.1 % 40Spiked Blank Biphenyl 2005/10/11 73 % 40 - 130

Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 2005/10/11 68 % 42 - 126RPD Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 2005/10/11 8.4 % 40Spiked Blank Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 2005/10/11 72 % 49 - 130RPD Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 2005/10/11 1.2 % 40Spiked Blank Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 2005/10/11 70 % 42 - 102RPD Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 2005/10/11 7.0 % 40Spiked Blank Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 2005/10/11 90 % 57 - 167RPD Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 2005/10/11 8.1 % 40Spiked Blank 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/11 77 % 53 - 127RPD 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/11 8.5 % 40Spiked Blank p-Chloroaniline 2005/10/11 79 % 30 - 130

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 17 of 23

Earth TechAttention: Bruce Noble Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596828

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits838501 AAT RPD p-Chloroaniline 2005/10/11 NC % 40

Spiked Blank 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/11 75 % 38 - 130RPD 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/11 6.1 % 40Spiked Blank 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2005/10/11 45 % 30 - 130RPD 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2005/10/11 9.7 % 40Spiked Blank Diethyl phthalate 2005/10/11 85 % 30 - 114RPD Diethyl phthalate 2005/10/11 9.1 % 40Spiked Blank Dimethyl phthalate 2005/10/11 82 % 30 - 112RPD Dimethyl phthalate 2005/10/11 9.2 % 40Spiked Blank Di-N-butyl phthalate 2005/10/11 90 % 30 - 130RPD Di-N-butyl phthalate 2005/10/11 10.7 % 40Spiked Blank Di-N-octyl phthalate 2005/10/11 90 % 30 - 130RPD Di-N-octyl phthalate 2005/10/11 12.4 % 40Spiked Blank 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/11 86 % 47 - 127RPD 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/11 11.2 % 40Spiked Blank 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/11 85 % 30 - 130RPD 2,6-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/11 10.1 % 40Spiked Blank Diphenyl Ether 2005/10/11 70 % 40 - 130RPD Diphenyl Ether 2005/10/11 1.9 % 40Spiked Blank Hexachlorobutadiene 2005/10/11 40 % 30 - 116RPD Hexachlorobutadiene 2005/10/11 10.6 % 40Spiked Blank Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2005/10/11 6.9 ( 1 ) % 30 - 130RPD Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2005/10/11 NC % 40Spiked Blank Hexachloroethane 2005/10/11 86 % 30 - 130RPD Hexachloroethane 2005/10/11 14.4 % 40Spiked Blank Isophorone 2005/10/11 75 % 35 - 150RPD Isophorone 2005/10/11 4.3 % 40Spiked Blank Nitrobenzene 2005/10/11 64 % 39 - 105RPD Nitrobenzene 2005/10/11 4.8 % 40Spiked Blank Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine 2005/10/11 67 % 40 - 130RPD Nitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine 2005/10/11 6.9 % 40Spiked Blank N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 2005/10/11 75 % 30 - 130RPD N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 2005/10/11 0.9 % 40Method Blank 2,4,6-Tribromophenol 2005/10/11 65 % 10 - 130

2-Fluorobiphenyl 2005/10/11 46 % 30 - 1302-Fluorophenol 2005/10/11 37 % 10 - 130D14-Terphenyl (FS) 2005/10/11 83 % 30 - 130D5-Nitrobenzene 2005/10/11 41 % 30 - 130D5-Phenol 2005/10/11 24 % 10 - 130Acenaphthene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LAcenaphthylene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LAcridine 2005/10/11 ND, DL=2 ug/LAnthracene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LBenzo(a)anthracene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LBenzo(a)pyrene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LBenzo(b/j)fluoranthene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LBenzo(g,h,i)perylene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LBenzo(k)fluoranthene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L1-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=1 ug/L2-Chloronaphthalene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LChrysene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LDibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LFluoranthene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LFluorene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L1-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 18 of 23

Earth TechAttention: Bruce Noble Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596828

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits838501 AAT Method Blank 2-Methylnaphthalene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/L

Naphthalene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LPhenanthrene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LPyrene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LQuinoline 2005/10/11 ND, DL=2 ug/L1,2-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,4-Dichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LHexachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LPentachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,3,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,3,5-Trichlorobenzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2-Chlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.3 ug/L4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/Lm/p-Cresol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/Lo-Cresol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorobenzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.3 ug/L2,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,6-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L3,4-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L3,5-Dichlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4-Dimethylphenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4-Dinitrophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=2 ug/L4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=2 ug/L2-Nitrophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L4-Nitrophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=1 ug/LPentachlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=1 ug/LPhenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.4 ug/L2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,5,6-Tetrachlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,4-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,3,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L3,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBenzyl butyl phthalate 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBiphenyl 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBis(2-chloroethyl)ether 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LBis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 2005/10/11 ND, DL=2 ug/L4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.3 ug/Lp-Chloroaniline 2005/10/11 ND, DL=1 ug/L4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LDiethyl phthalate 2005/10/11 ND, DL=1 ug/LDimethyl phthalate 2005/10/11 ND, DL=1 ug/LDi-N-butyl phthalate 2005/10/11 ND, DL=2 ug/LDi-N-octyl phthalate 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.8 ug/L

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 19 of 23

Earth TechAttention: Bruce Noble Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596828

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits838501 AAT Method Blank 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L

2,6-Dinitrotoluene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LDiphenyl Ether 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.3 ug/LHexachlorobutadiene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.4 ug/LHexachlorocyclopentadiene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=2 ug/LHexachloroethane 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LIsophorone 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LNitrobenzene 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LNitrosodiphenylamine/Diphenylamine 2005/10/11 ND, DL=1 ug/LN-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine 2005/10/11 ND, DL=0.5 ug/L

843064 SMK MATRIX SPIKE[I49635-01] Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/15 - % 75 - 125

Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/15 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/15 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/15 108 % 75 - 125Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/15 110 % 75 - 125Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/15 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/15 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/15 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/15 91 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/15 98 % 75 - 125Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2005/10/15 100 % 75 - 125Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2005/10/15 110 % 75 - 125Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/15 109 % 75 - 125Dissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/15 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2005/10/15 90 % 75 - 125Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/15 98 % 75 - 125Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/15 103 % 75 - 125Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2005/10/15 100 % 75 - 125Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/15 93 % 75 - 125Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/15 88 % 75 - 125Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/15 104 % 75 - 125Dissolved Sulphur (S) 2005/10/15 108 % 75 - 125Dissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/15 113 % 75 - 125Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2005/10/15 86 % 75 - 125Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2005/10/15 111 % 75 - 125Dissolved Uranium (U) 2005/10/15 107 % 75 - 125Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/15 98 % 75 - 125Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2005/10/15 - % 75 - 125

QC STANDARD Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/15 104 % 75 - 125Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/15 110 % 75 - 125Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/15 87 % 75 - 125Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/15 100 % 75 - 125Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/15 100 % 75 - 125Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/15 101 % 75 - 125Dissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/15 86 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/15 104 % 75 - 125Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/15 89 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/15 98 % 75 - 125Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2005/10/15 95 % 75 - 125Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2005/10/15 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/15 90 % 75 - 125Dissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/15 95 % 75 - 125Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2005/10/15 88 % 75 - 125Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/15 115 % 75 - 125Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/15 104 % 75 - 125

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 20 of 23

Earth TechAttention: Bruce Noble Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596828

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits843064 SMK QC STANDARD Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2005/10/15 - % N/A

Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/15 95 % 75 - 125Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/15 106 % 75 - 125Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/15 108 % 75 - 125Dissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/15 96 % 75 - 125Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2005/10/15 - % N/ADissolved Titanium (Ti) 2005/10/15 - % N/ADissolved Uranium (U) 2005/10/15 - % N/ADissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/15 90 % 75 - 125Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2005/10/15 106 % 75 - 125

Spiked Blank Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/15 79 % 75 - 125Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/15 - % 75 - 125Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/15 80 % 75 - 125Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/15 107 % 75 - 125Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/15 100 % 75 - 125Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/15 94 % 75 - 125Dissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/15 94 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/15 119 % 75 - 125Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/15 84 % 75 - 125Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/15 94 % 75 - 125Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2005/10/15 94 % 75 - 125Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2005/10/15 119 % 75 - 125Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/15 99 % 75 - 125Dissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/15 80 % 75 - 125Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2005/10/15 84 % 75 - 125Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/15 102 % 75 - 125Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/15 102 % 75 - 125Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2005/10/15 86 % 75 - 125Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/15 78 % 75 - 125Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/15 111 % 75 - 125Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/15 106 % 75 - 125Dissolved Sulphur (S) 2005/10/15 88 % 75 - 125Dissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/15 102 % 75 - 125Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2005/10/15 79 % 75 - 125Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2005/10/15 115 % 75 - 125Dissolved Uranium (U) 2005/10/15 95 % 75 - 125Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/15 90 % 75 - 125Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2005/10/15 118 % 75 - 125

Method Blank Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=5 ug/LDissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=0.4 ug/LDissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=0.6 ug/LDissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=0.4 ug/LDissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=0.5 ug/LDissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=100 ug/LDissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=0.3 ug/LDissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=1 ug/LDissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=1 ug/LDissolved Copper (Cu) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Iron (Fe) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=100 ug/LDissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=1 ug/LDissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=1 ug/LDissolved Manganese (Mn) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=4 ug/LDissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=4 ug/LDissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=3 ug/LDissolved Phosphorus (P) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=100 ug/L

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 21 of 23

Earth TechAttention: Bruce Noble Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596828

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits843064 SMK Method Blank Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=1 ug/L

Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Sulphur (S) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=4000 ug/LDissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=0.8 ug/LDissolved Tin (Sn) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=20 ug/LDissolved Titanium (Ti) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=3 ug/LDissolved Uranium (U) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=0.2 ug/LDissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=2 ug/LDissolved Zinc (Zn) 2005/10/15 ND, DL=2 ug/L

RPD [ I 4 9 6 3 5 - 0 1 ] Dissolved Aluminum (Al) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Antimony (Sb) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Arsenic (As) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Barium (Ba) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Beryllium (Be) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Bismuth (Bi) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Boron (B) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Cadmium (Cd) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Chromium (Cr) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Cobalt (Co) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Copper (Cu) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Iron (Fe) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Lead (Pb) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Lithium (Li) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Manganese (Mn) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Molybdenum (Mo) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Nickel (Ni) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Phosphorus (P) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Selenium (Se) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Silver (Ag) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Strontium (Sr) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Sulphur (S) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Thallium (Tl) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Tin (Sn) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Titanium (Ti) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Uranium (U) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Vanadium (V) 2005/10/15 NC % 25Dissolved Zinc (Zn) 2005/10/15 NC % 25

844700 TMD MATRIX SPIKE Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2005/10/18 - % 70 - 130Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2005/10/18 114 % 70 - 130Dissolved Potassium (K) 2005/10/18 - % 70 - 130Dissolved Silicon (Si) 2005/10/18 126 % 70 - 130Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/18 - % 70 - 130

QC STANDARD Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2005/10/18 125 % 70 - 130Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2005/10/18 117 % 70 - 130Dissolved Potassium (K) 2005/10/18 84 % 70 - 130Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/18 101 % 70 - 130

Spiked Blank Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2005/10/18 118 % 70 - 130Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2005/10/18 104 % 70 - 130Dissolved Potassium (K) 2005/10/18 84 % 70 - 130Dissolved Silicon (Si) 2005/10/18 123 % 70 - 130Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/18 82 % 70 - 130

Method Blank Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2005/10/18 ND, DL=0.1 mg/LDissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2005/10/18 0.1, DL=0.1 mg/LDissolved Potassium (K) 2005/10/18 ND, DL=1 mg/LDissolved Silicon (Si) 2005/10/18 ND, DL=0.5 mg/L

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 22 of 23

Earth TechAttention: Bruce Noble Client Project #: 85989P.O. #: Project name: COKE OVENS

Quality Assurance Report (Continued)Maxxam Job Number: KA596828

QA/QC DateBatch Analyzed

Num Init QC Type Parameter yyyy/mm/dd Value Recovery Units QC Limits844700 TMD Method Blank Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/18 ND, DL=1 mg/L

RPD Dissolved Calcium (Ca) 2005/10/18 23.6 % 30Dissolved Magnesium (Mg) 2005/10/18 11.5 % 30Dissolved Potassium (K) 2005/10/18 NC % 30Dissolved Silicon (Si) 2005/10/18 NC % 30Dissolved Sodium (Na) 2005/10/18 NC % 30

847060 KMO Spiked Blank Isobutylbenzene - Extractable 2005/10/21 97 % 30 - 130n-Dotriacontane - Extractable 2005/10/21 96 % 30 - 130>C10-C21 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/21 95 % 40 - 130

RPD >C10-C21 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/21 3.1 % 40Spiked Blank >C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/21 80 % 40 - 130RPD >C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/21 2.5 % 40Method Blank Isobutylbenzene - Extractable 2005/10/21 99 % 30 - 130

n-Dotriacontane - Extractable 2005/10/21 99 % 30 - 130>C10-C21 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/21 ND, DL=0.16 mg/L>C21-<C32 Hydrocarbons 2005/10/21 ND, DL=0.51 mg/L

ND = Not detectedN/A = Not ApplicableNC = Non-calculableRPD = Relative Percent DifferenceQC Standard = Quality Control StandardSPIKE = Fortified sample

( 1 ) Please note that the recovery of some compounds are outside control limits however the overall quality control for this analysis meets ouracceptability criteria.

This document is in electronic format, hard copy is available on request.

Page 23 of 23