Pump & System - Feb 2016

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    1/60

    FEBRUARY 2016

    PUMPSANDSYSTEMS.COM

    The Leading Magazine for Pump Users Worldwide

    SYSTEMS

    K A L A M A Z O O R I V E R R E M E D I A T IO N D I V E R T S 5. 9 B I L L IO N G A L L O N S | 3 Q U E S T I O NS A B O U T U SI N G I oT

    SMARTPUMPINGEnhancing security & increasing

    uptime with intelligent controls

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    2/60

    Circle 100 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    3/60

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

        C    i   r   c    l   e    1    0    1   o   n   c   a   r    d   o   r   v    i   s    i   t

       p   s    f   r   e   e    i   n    f   o .   c   o   m .

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    4/60

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    5/60Circle 103 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    6/60

     

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

    30  ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGIES CONTROL COMPLEX PUMPING  PROCESSES & SYSTEMS

      By Jeff Payne, AutomationDirect.comPLC-based PACs ll the gap between traditional distributed controlsystems and basic programmable logic controllers.

    34  INTELLIGENT PUMP CONTROL REDUCESENERGY CONSUMPTION BY 80 PERCENT

      By Martin Hoffmann, Colfax Fluid Handling/Allweiler

     A ame retardant manufacturer incorporatedfrequency converters to control its cooling waterpumps.

    38  3 QUESTIONS TO ASK BEFORE IOT

    IMPLEMENTATION  By Jon Hilberg, Accudyne Industries—Precision Flow Systems

     A well-planned systems approach to predictiveanalytics using cloud connectivity can optimize pumping systems.

    COVERS E R I E S

    2  FROM THE EDITOR

    6  NEWS

    53  PRODUCTS

    54  PUMP USERS MARKETPLACE

    56  PUMP MARKET ANALYSIS

    MART PUMPING

    PUMPING PRESCRIPTIONS

    12  By Lev Nelik, Ph.D., P.E. Pumping Machinery, LLC

    Using Pump Effi ciency Monitoring toMake Faster Decisions

    PUMP SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT

    15  By Ray HardeeEngineered Software, Inc.

    Troubleshooting a Piping SystemFirst of Two Parts

    COMMON PUMPING MISTAKES

    18  By Jim Elsey  Summit Pump, Inc.

    Solid Shaft Designs & Cartridge Seals

    INDUSTRY INSIGHTS

    22  By Mike Pemberton  Pumps & Systems

    Intelligent Pumping Continues to Evolve

    COLUMNS

    This issue FEBRUARYVolume 24 • Number 2

    PUMPS & EQUIPMENTFOR HARSH CONDITIONS

    24  LIQUID-LUBRICATED DOUBLE SEALS INCREASE STABILITY FOR PTAPRODUCTION

    By Andreas Pehl, EagleBurgmann Germany Gmbh & Co. KgOne facility’s high-speed centrifugal pumps saw improved performance and effi-

    ciency after adding custom seals.

    27  MATCH HYDRAULIC FLUIDS TO SEAL LIP MATERIALBy Stephen A. Maloney, Colonial Seal Company 

    Companies interested in reducing safety hazards and environmental impact shouldconsider compatibility issues.

    S P E C I A L

    S E C T I O N

    PRACTICE & O PERATIONS

    48  PUMPING SYSTEM DIVERTS 5.9BILLION GALLONS OF WATERFOR KALAMAZOO RIVERREMEDIATION

    By Duane Hargis, Cornell Pump Co. 

    & Rich Goethals, BakerCorp 

    DEPARTMENTS

    40  EFFICIENCY MATTERSPeristaltic Pumps Offer Protection in

    Mining Operations

    By Tom O’Donnell, Abaque, part of PSG

    42  MAINTENANCE MINDERSCreative Coupling Design Saves

    Downtime at Utility Plant

    By Jim Anderson, Coupling Corporation

    of America

    44  SEALING SENSEWhat to Consider When Upgrading or

    Changing Pre-Specified Gaskets

    By Mike Shorts, FSA Member & President

    46  HI PUMP FAQSSubmersible Vertical Turbine Pump

    Intake Designs, Common AC Single-

    Phase Motors

    By Hydraulic Institute

    50  MOTORS & DRIVESObtain Maximum Bearing Life &

    Performance

    By Mike Pulley, Bartlett BearingCompany

    48

    34

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    7/60

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016Circle 102 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    8/60

    6 NEWS

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

    NEW HIRES,PROMOTIONS & RECOGNITIONS

    RICH GREATTI 

    FLUID SEALING INTERNATIONAL

    CORAOPOLIS, Penn. (Jan. 5, 2016) – FluidSealing International has announced that RichGreatti has joined the company as directorof sales and marketing. Greatti brings morethan 30 years of experience in the fluid sealing

    industry in sales, engineering and businessdevelopment with a successful track recordthat includes international sales, product development as well asmanaging a global sales force. He has helped develop several newsealing products and a successful distribution/direct/OEM network inthe fluid sealing industry. worldfsi.com 

    CHUCK KELLOGG, HUBBARD-HALL

    WATERBURY, Conn. (Dec. 11, 2015) – Hubbard-Hall Chairman/CFOChuck Kellogg has received the prestigious Lifetime AchievementAward at the annual meeting of the National Association of ChemicalDistributors (NACD). Kellogg was one of the founding members ofNACD in 1971 when he and other CEOs recognized the need for thechemical distribution industry to adopt best practices and becomeovert stewards of the chemical distribution process. Kellogg hasremained active and vocal in the association since its founding.  hubbardhall.com

    BOB LAUSON, PSG

    OAKBROOK TERRACE, Ill. (Dec. 9, 2015) – PSG, a Dover company,has appointed Bob Lauson to general manager for PSG Grand Rapids(Blackmer). In this role, Lauson will be responsible for leading theGrand Rapids organization and will report directly to PSG PresidentKarl Buscher. He will be based out of the PSG Grand Rapids facilityin Grand Rapids, Michigan. Lauson joined PSG from Terra SonicInternational, where he held the position of president. psgdover.com/en/blackmer/home

    ALEXANDER SEVERT

    & JIARAN SUN

    WATER PLANET 

    LOS ANGELES (Dec. 7, 2015)

    Water Planet has furtherexpanded its engineering teamwith the addition of AlexanderSevert as mechanical anddesign engineer and Jiaran Sunas research and development engineer. At Water Planet, Severt willprovide modeling, fabrication and design support to the membraneand system design team. Sun will assist with the developmentand commercialization of Water Planet’s PolyCera polymer andmembranes. waterplanet.com  

    HEATHER GREEN, APPLETON GROUP

    ROSEMONT, Ill. (Dec. 4, 2015) – Heather Green has been promotedto director of product marketing for Appleton Group, a division ofEmerson. In this role, Green will work with product management, theengineering team and global sales for the division’s brands Appleton,O-Z/Gedney and others to achieve success across multiple industries.She will report directly to Tim Graff, vice president of engineering for

    Appleton Group, within the engineering organization. As leader ofthe product management team, Green will guide Voice of Customerresearch, identify customer value propositions, define platformstrategy, establish product requirements and improve supportingoverall business processes. emersonindustrial.com 

    MYLA PETREE

    BALDOR ELECTRIC COMPANY

    FORT SMITH, Ark. (Nov. 24, 2015) – BaldorElectric Company has appointed Myla Petree tothe newly created position of director – strategicprogram management. In this role, she anda recently formed team of project managerswill be responsible for organizing, driving andsuccessfully implementing key projects across avariety of Baldor locations and products. Petree joined Baldor in 2011as the company’s director of quality. Petree has a bachelor’s degreein mechanical engineering from the University of Oklahoma and is anASQ Certified Manager of Quality/Organizational Excellence.baldor.com

    Rich Greatti

    JiaranSun

    Alexander

    Severt

    Myla Petree

     

    MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    9/60

    7

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016Circle 104 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    10/60

    8 NEWS

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

    STW Resources Holding CorpReceives Approval for WaterPermit in West TexasMIDLAND, Texas (Dec. 16, 2015) – STWResources Holding Corp., a provider ofpipeline services, water reclamationand processing management servicesincluding water desalination, hasreceived approval from the MiddlePecos Water District for drilling,production and transportation of thewater on STW Water’s MRK lease inPecos County. Previously, STW Waterapplied for a consolidated drillingand production permit from the San

    Andrés formation to be utilized withinthe county and exported out of PecosCounty to surrounding areas in need ofwater. The company also has the abilityto submit a request to the water districtfor a larger permit once it is determinedby a hydrogeologist that theformation can withstand an increasein yield without any negative effects.Additionally, with several prospectivebuyers already in place, STW canbegin selling water immediately. Thecompany anticipates water sales in thefirst quarter of 2016, as it has alreadyreceived a letter of intent from acustomer to purchase water.

    stwresources.com

    Xylem Supplies Technologyfor Vital Connector Routein EuropeLANAYE, Belgium (Dec. 10, 2015)Xylem has designed a water pumpingsolution as part of a complex project toexpand the Lanaye Locks in Belgium, avital connector route between Northernand Southern Europe. Xylem’s Flygtpumps and turbines will regulate waterlevels in the canal network and harness

    energy from excess water in the AlbertCanal. The addition of a fourth Lanayelock (225 x 25 meters) will quadruplethe lock system’s convoy capacityfrom 2,000 to 9,000 tons. The pumpingsolution, which includes five Flygt 500kilowatt submersible hydroturbineswith a flow of 18 cubic meters persecond, pumps water back into theAlbert canal, maintaining adequatelevels to accommodate canal trafficduring dry weather spells. xyleminc.com

    Siemens Joins Notre Dameto Develop $36 MillionTesting FacilityATLANTA (Dec. 9, 2015) – Siemenshas announced that it will supply theUniversity of Notre Dame with the mainmotor and variable frequency drivefor its new Turbomachinery Facility.The facility will be a research and testfacility for advancing the technologyused in gas turbine engines used by thecommercial and military aircraft, powerplant, and the oil and gas industries.Siemens will provide a 10-megawattSINAMICS SM120 variable frequency

    drive and a 5-megawatt SIMOTICSAboveNEMA TEWAC motor.

    siemens.com

    KLINGER Holding GmbH FormsKLINGER IGI Inc.VANCOUVER, Wash. (Dec. 1, 2015)KLINGER Holding GmbH in Austria hasannounced the formation of KLINGERIGI Inc. as an addition to the group’sindustrial gasketing presence in theU.S. Headquartered in Wilsonville,Oregon, with an additional locationin Denver, Colorado, the seals and

    gasketing manufacturer is a result ofKLINGER’s acquisition of IGI.klinger-international.com

    China Leads World in PrivatelyFunded Water InvestmentBOSTON (Dec. 1, 2015) – China is firmlypositioned as the global epicenter forprivately financed water investment.The combined water infrastructurebuild-out across 20 provinces accountsfor more than 50 percent of privatelyfinanced treatment capacity addedin emerging markets over the lastdecade. According to a new report

    from Bluefield Research, China’swastewater treatment market hasadded more than 20 million cubicmeters per day of capacity from 2013-2015. The level of annual investmenthas surged to more than $5 billionin 2014. As a result, private firmsnow manage about two-thirds ofthe country’s wastewater treatmentinfrastructure. bluefieldresearch.com/china-municipal-wastewater-

    market-private-player-opportunities-

    strategies-2015-2020/ 

    Massachusetts WaterResources Authority MovesForward with Pump SystemOptimization ProgramPARSIPPANY, N.J. (Nov. 30, 2015)Massachusetts Water ResourcesAuthority (MWRA), which provideswholesale water and sewer services to2.5 million people and more than 5,500large industrial users, conducted anin-house Pump System Optimization(PSO) Program in November 2015as a precursor to a pump systemassessment of all its facilities. ThePSO Program was developed by the

    Hydraulic Institute for engineers,operations, facilities, maintenanceand management personnel toeducate their staff about operatingpump systems more efficiently. A.W.Chesterton Company and WEG ElectricCorp. co-hosted this particular pumpsystem optimization training course. mwra.com

    World’s Largest 5-TurbineCommercial Tidal InstallationPut into ServiceDEN OEVER/SCHIEDAM, The

    Netherlands (Nov. 26 2015) – The tidalpower plant in the Dutch EasternScheldt surge barrier has been putinto service. The commissioning forthe largest tidal energy project in theNetherlands as well as the world’slargest commercial tidal installation offive turbines in an array was performedby Diederik Samsom, Dutch LabourParty group chairman. tocardo.com

    CENTA and Christie & GreyLimited Announce GlobalSales Cooperation

    AURORA, Ill. (Nov. 16, 2015) – Themanagement teams of CENTA AntriebeKirschey GmbH and Christie & GreyLimited have announced a strategicglobal sales cooperation between theircompanies. The agreement allowsthe two companies to join forces toengineer and strategically supplythe industry’s premium “quiet drive”solutions—combining soft mountingsystems, flexible couplings andintermediate drive shaft systems. centa.info christiegrey.com

    AROUND THE INDUSTRY

    To have a news item considered, please send the information to Amelia Messamore, [email protected].

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    11/60

    9

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

    PRESSURE?NO PROBLEM.

    7020 Series

    Q U A L I T Y . S E R V I C E . I N N O V A T I O N . I N T E G R I T Y .

    1-800-928-7867 | www.zoellerengprod.com

    The Shark ® 7020 Series Progressing Cavity

    Grinder Pumps are ideal for pressure sewer

    systems. For commercial and residential

    sewage removal with high head requirements,

    these pumps have an integral pressure reliefvalve. Packages designed for new installations

    and retrofitting existing systems. Designed,

    machined, assembled in the USA. Cast iron,

    Cool Run™ design is fully submersible.

    100% factory tested.

    YOUR PEACE OF MINDIS OUR TOP PRIORITY.®

    Circle 105 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    12/60

    10 NEWS

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

    FEBRUARY 24, 20161 P.M. EASTERN

    Sponsored by

     January 28, 2016 How to Read a Pump Curve (now available online)

    February 24, 2016 Efficient Pump Selection and Control

    March 23, 2016 Introduction to Boiler Feed Systems

    April 27, 2016 Choose the Right Pump for the Application

    May 18, 2016 Vertical Turbine Pumps - Wire-to-Water 

     June 22, 2016 Dosing Basics

    F  R E E 

    A 6-PART WEBINAR SERIES

    Efficient PumpSelection andControlTHE SECOND IN A 6-PART WEBINAR SERIES FOR 2016

    pumpsandsystems.com/2016/grundfos

    Sign up today for this webinar and the entire series!

    With more focus on energy efficiency these days, building owners

    will rely on pump experts to assist in the determination of efficient

    pumping solutions. For variable flow systems this poses some

    challenges when single and parallel connected variable speed pumpsare evaluated. This webinar will help to answer questions like: “How

    many pumps should our system use?” and “How should we sequence

    (stage) on additional pumps?”

    Presenter Reece Robinson has a bachelor of

    science degree in mechanical engineering from

    California State University Fresno. He has more

    than 16 years experience providing variable

    speed pumping solutions and energy analysis for

    commercial, municipal and industrial applications.

    Participants will receive a certificate to submit for CEU credits!

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    13/60

    11

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

     

     

        C    i   r

       c    l   e    1    0    9   o   n   c   a   r    d   o   r   v    i   s    i   t   p   s    f   r   e   e    i   n    f   o .   c   o   m .

    EVENTSThe Process Heat Exchangers:Applications & Rules-of-ThumbShort CourseFeb. 1 – 2, 2016HTRI HeadquartersNavasota, Texas979-690-3250

    20th Annual ARC Industry Forum –Industry in Transition: Navigatingthe New Age of InnovationFeb. 8 – 11, 2016Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorldOrlando, Florida781-471-1175 / arcweb.com

    Maintenance Planning &SchedulingFeb. 17 – 19, 2016San Francisco, California203-783-1582 / newstandardinstitute.com/product/maintenance-planning-and-scheduling/

    WQA Convention & ExpositionMarch 14 – 17, 2016

    Music City CenterNashville, Tennessee630-505-0160 / wqa.org/convention

    Offshore Technology Conference(OTC)May 2 – 5, 2016NRG ParkHouston, Texas972-952-9494 / 2016.otcnet.org

    2016 EASA ConventionJune 12 – 14, 2016

    Metro Toronto Convention CentreToronto, Ontario314-993-2220 / easa.com

    National Fire Protection Association(NFPA) Conference & ExpoJune 13 – 16, 2016Mandalay Bay Convention CenterLas Vegas, Nevada800-344-3555 / nfpa.org/training/ events-calendar 

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    14/60

    Using Pump Efficiency Monitoring to MakeFaster Decisions

    In 2015, I wrote a series

    for Pumps & Systems titled

    “Effi ciency Monitoring Saves

    Plants Millions.” I gave readers

    a real-world example of the

    importance of understanding how

    equipment is performing. Below,

    I answer a question from a reader

    about the effectiveness and speed

    of plant monitoring systems.

    Letter from a Reader

    “I enjoyed your four-part series

    (Pumps & Systems, July, August,

    September and October 2015)

    relating the dynamics of what goes

    on at the plants in an interesting

    real-world dialogue format. You

    started the set by introducingthe reader to a pump salesman,

    Bob, who visits the water plant

    and works with a local plant

    maintenance manager, Jim, on

    measuring the effi ciency of his

    large pumps. Other people get

    involved along the way, and the

    amount of savings they discovered

    shocked me—nearly $125,000

    for a 3,000-horsepower pump. In

    Part 1 of your article series, you

    said the entire test was done inless than a day by a system you

    referred to as “PREMS,” but you

    did not describe what it is. We have

    plant monitoring systems in our

    plant, but they cost millions, and

    I doubt that anything, no matter

    how simple that may sound, can be

    done in a day. Can you elaborate?”

    Jack Francis

    Chemical plant employee

    Chicago, Illinois

    Nelik’s Response

    Tank you for your question. It

    does not surprise me that the

    amount of wasted energy seemed

    so high to you. Most folks think

    more about a piece of machinery’s

    reliabil ity than about its effi ciency.

    Te thought process is, “If a pump

    fails too often, water spills a ll over

    the plant, and I get home late for

    dinner.” Tat is personal. But to

    look at a running pump to see 10

    percent effi ciency being wasted,

    that is often too abstract.

    But the numbers are there—

    in dollars instead of red ink on

    a pump housing. Consider the

    3,000-horsepower (hp) pump

    in the articles you mentioned.

    Multiplying 3,000 hp by 0.746 gives

    us 2,238 kilowatts. Multiply that

    by 24 hours for 365 days, times

    $0.10 per kilowatt-hour, and it

    adds up to $2 million. If 10 percent

    is wasted, that is $200,000. Te

    $125,000 in the articles is adjusted

    for the pump running less than 100

    percent of time.

    Figure 1 (above). Live data streaming in. Figure 2 (below). Spectral (FFT) data is taken and

    displayed continuously by the PREMS system.

    12 PUMPING PRESCRIPTIONS

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

    By  Lev Nelik, Ph.D., P.E.

    Pumping Machinery, LLC, P&S Editorial Advisory Board

    Troubleshooting & repair challenges

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    15/60

    For details of how to measureeffi ciency, let me do a brief review.

    In March 2007, Pumps & Systems 

    published “How Much Energy is

    Wasted When Wear Rings Are

    Worn to Double Teir Initial

     Value?” Double was picked because

    that is the point where most

    original equipment manufacturers

    (OEMs) recommend replacement

    of rings. But such repairs are

    costly. Users do not know the worn

    dimensions until they pull thewear rings from the pump.

    By measuring effi ciency

    continually, they can pinpoint the

    time when the effi ciency value

    drops below the value that justifies

    the repair and restoration of the

    ring clearances to the initial OEM

    recommended values. Continuousmonitoring reconstructs the entire

    performance curve, because most

    pumps do not “sit” at the same

    flow. In response to changes in

    the system, the flow changes, and

    pressure, power and effi cienc y

    change with it.

     A dynamic, live reconstruction

    of the performance curve does not

    require intrusive periodic testing.

    Continuous monitoring makes the

    performance curve more accurateand detailed over time. It would

    also tell where the plant typically

    runs—something that plants

    often do not know.

    In regard to the pump’s

    reliabil ity and effi ciency

    measurement system (PREMS)

    in Part 1 (Pumps & Systems,July 2015), the key to a good

    technology is accuracy and

    simplicity. Te PREMS is

    essentially a box, similar to a

    suitcase, that can be installed

    for one pump, monitoring it for a

    period of time, and then moved as

    needed to another pump.

     Te system transmits through

    a wireless cell gateway (or a

    local modem), alleviating any

    concerns of interfering withthe plant operational system.

    Instrumentation measures

    pressure, flow and amps, which the

    software converts into a complete

    pump performance curve (head-

    capacity, power and effi ciency) that

    is displayed on the screen.

    Circle 111 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

    13

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    16/60

    Examining the data over time

    reveals that the pump operatesmainly in two regions (see Figure

    1, page 12). One region is near

    the best effi ciency point, but the

    other is much closer to the shutoff

    head (below minimum continuous

    stable flow). Te second region is

    in the area where internal forces,

    pulsations and vibrations are

    detrimental to the pump. Vibrations

    are measured continually, including

    overall values and spectral (Fast

    Fourier ransform, or FF) data

    to troubleshoot live. Te chart

    on Figure 2 (page 12) shows the

    first and second harmonics being

    predominant (1X and 2X). What

    does it tell us? Email me your

    answer from the following choices

    for a chance to win a discounted

    seat at the next Pump School.

    a. Rotor unbalance

    b. Misalignmentc. Cavitation

    d. Both a and b

    e. a, b and c

    Using Figure 1, we can compare

    the original OEM performance,

    shown with solid lines, to actual

    performance, shown with multiple

    data points outlining the evolving

    curves. Te system provides stand-

    alone data acquisition, combining

    instrumentation with software,

    to present a real, standard pump

    curve—live and continually.

    Interpretation of data is simple—it

    is on the screen. Te difference in

    effi ciency is calculated continually

    and translated into yearly prorated

    dollars wasted. Tis data can

    help users decide between repair

    (yearly energy cost vs. repair cost),

    adjustments to the system or no

    action (if energy cost is smallrelative to the quoted repair cost).

    For more information, email

    me or visit Pump Video Academy

    online at pumpingmachinery.

    com/pump_school/PVA/pva.htm

    (modules #10 and #11).

    T F S E A L S U S A . C O M

     We Deliver!

    [email protected]

    Phone: 1.713.568.5547

    Fax: 1.713.758.0388

    10620 Stebbins Cir, Suite E

    Houston, TX 77043

    Serving Manufacturers and Distributors Over 30 Years! 

    PZ05

    metal bellow cartridgemechanical seal

    TF-P241

    packing Nomex fiberand graphite PTFE

    TF-P214

    packing 100% PureGraphite PTFE yarn

    Circle 119 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

    Dr. Nelik (aka “Dr. Pump”)

    is president of Pumping

    Machinery, LLC, an Atlanta-

    based firm specializing in pump

    consulting, training, equipment

    troubleshooting and pump

    repairs. Dr. Nelik has 30 years

    of experience in pumps and

    pumping equipment. He may

    be reached at pump-magazine.

    com. For more information, visit

    pumpingmachinery.com/pump_

    school/pump_school.htm.

    14 PUMPING PRESCRIPTIONS

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    17/60

     A better understanding of complete system operation

    Troubleshooting a Piping System

    First of Two Parts

    Using the example system

    in Figure 1, this series

    will focus on the process

    elements found in piping systems.

    In this example, a process fluid

    is pumped from a storage tank,

    PX-K-120, through an end suction

    pump, PX-PU-120, specified to

    pass 800 gallons per minute (gpm)

    with 202 feet of head. From the

    pump discharge, the 80 F process

    fluid travels to a heat exchanger,

    PX-HX-121, where the fluid is

    heated to 120 F. Level control

    PX-LCV-120 maintains the level

    in process vessel PX-PV-122 to 15

    feet. Te system boundaries are

    the tanks PX-K-120 and PX-VP-

    122. Te system contains only onecircuit. able 1 lists the physical

    properties of the process fluid.

    Less than six months ago, a

    piping system model was created

    and validated using the installed

    plant instrumentation (values are

    shown in Figure 1). Te difference

    between these values and the

    calculated results was less than

    2 percent.

    Te piping drawing shows that

    the flow rate through the systemis controlled to maintain the level

    in the process vessel PX-PV-122 at

    15 feet. Te system does not have

    an installed flow meter, so we must

    determine the system flow rate.

    One of the easiest methods

    is to use a portable clamp-on

    ultrasonic flow meter. If operated

    correctly, these devices can provide

    accuracy of ±1 percent. During

    the assessment, the flow meter

    indicated a flow rate of 770 gpm.

    In a previous column, we

    discovered that the flow rate

    through a pump can be calculated

    by converting the differential

    pressure to head. Using the pump

    curve, enter the value for pump

    head on the vertical axis and movehorizontally until you intersect the

    pump curve. Ten move down to

    determine the flow rate.

    Figure 1. Example system consisting of the items making up the systemalong with displayed operating data (Graphics courtesy of the author)

    Table 1. Physical properties of the process fluid used in this example

    Fluid Temp (F) Density (lb/ft3 ) Viscosity (cP) Vapor press (psia)

    Process fluid 80 48.9 0.30 8.8

    Process fluid 120 47.3 0.25 16.4

    Table 2. Comparing as observed conditions with cavitation to validated results

    Condition/Value PX-TK-120

    ft

     PX-PI-120

    psi

     PX-PI-121

    psi

     PX-LCV-120position*

    PX-PV-122

    level

    PX-PV-122psi

    Current Operation 5 -2.0 65 78% 15 20

    Validated 5 0.4 69.6 69% 15 20

    * The value position is not on the operator’s log sheet.

    NPSHa =

    Formula 1

    NPSHa = (-2 + 14.7 - 8.8) x =11.5 ft

    Where:P

    in = Suction pressure psig

    Patm

     = Atmospheric pressure psia

    Pvp

     = Fluid vapor pressure psig

    Ρ = Fluid density lb/ft3

    144

    ρ(P

    in + P

    atm - P

    vp) x

    144

    48.9

    Equation 1

    15

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

    By Ray Hardee

    Engineered Software, Inc.

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    18/60

    In this example, the differentialpressure across the pump is 69.2 pounds

    per square inch (psi). Using a process

    fluid density of 48.9 pounds per cubic

    foot (lb/ft3), we can determine a pump

    head of 203.8 feet.

    Te manufacturer’s supplied pump

    curve shows that, with a head of 204

    feet, the flow rate through the pump

    is 770 gpm. Te flow rate calculated

    through the pump correlates with the

    flow rate obtained with the ultrasonic

    flow meter.

    Now that we have discussed how the

    model was validated with the observed

    values, we can troubleshoot.

     An operator notifies the shift

    supervisor that pump PX-PU-120

    sounds like it is cavitating. Additionally,

    the pump discharge pressure gauge is

    oscillating, another indication of possible

    pump cavitation. able 2 shows thesystem’s current operation along with

    the validated results.

    able 2 shows that the levels and

    pressures at the system boundary tanks

    are the same in both conditions, resulting

    in the same static head. Te pressure at

    pump suction pressure PX-PI-120 is -2

    pounds per square inch gauge (psig), 2.4

    psi less than the validated results. Te

    pump discharge pressure PX-PI-121 is 67

    psi, 2.6 psi less than the validated results.

     According to able 2, the position of

    PX-LCV-120 is 78 percent open, greater

    than the validated results.

    Te first step is to determine if these

    conditions are the cause of cavitation.

    Using Equation 1, we will determine

    the net positive suction head available

    (NPSHa) at the pump suction based on the

    pressure gauge reading at PX-PI-120.

     As indicated in Figure 1, the NPSHais 11.5 feet. Te pump curve shows that

    the net positive suction head required

    (NPSHr) is 14.3 feet. As a result, the

    NPSHa is greater than the NPSHr,

    indicating pump cavitation is occurring.

    Because the pump is cavitating, the pump

    is probably not operating on its curve.

    Part 2 of this series will use the

    data discussed here to determine the

    cause of cavitation and analyze other

    system problems.

    Ray Hardee is a principal founder of

    Engineered Software, creators of PIPE-FLO

    and PUMP-FLO software. At Engineered

    Software, he helped develop two training

    courses and teaches these courses

    internationally. He may be reached at ray.

    [email protected].

     

     

     

    BOOTH

    5429

    Circle 115 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

    16 PUMP SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    19/60

    17

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

        C    i   r   c    l   e    1    5    1   o   n   c   a   r    d   o   r   v    i   s    i   t   p   s    f   r   e   e    i   n    f   o .   c   o   m .

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    20/60

    COMMON PUMPING MISTAKES

    This month’s column

    focuses on whether to use

    shaft sleeves in overhung

    centrifugal pumps (ype OH-1

    per American Petroleum Institute

    [API] 610 designation). Te mostcommon OH-1 pump type is the

     American National Standards

    Institute (ANSI) B73.1M. Te

    practice of using cartridge-type

    mechanical seals on solid pump

    shafts (in lieu of sleeved shafts)

    is not new or radical. While the

    benefits of building a pump in this

    manner are real and measurable in

    most instances, a large percentage

    of pump owners will not change.

    Background

    I would estimate that shaft sleeves

    have been used on pump shafts for

    at least 100 years. My 1919 edition

    of Pumping Machinery by Arthur M.

    Greene mentions “sacrificial shaft

    liners.” I do not know exactly when

    the first pump shaft sleeve was put

    into service, but I assume it was

    not long after someone adjusted

    the packing incorrectly on an

    expensive pump.Shaft sleeves serve multiple

    purposes. Te most important is to

    protect the main pump shaft from

    wear caused by packing abrasion,

    followed closely by prevention of

    erosion and corrosion. In some

    pump designs, the sleeve serves

    additional purposes. For example,

    in some horizontal split-case

    pumps, the sleeve also serves

    (in conjunction with a threaded

    shaft nut) as an adjustable means

    to axial ly locate the impeller on

    its respective mechanical and

    hydraulic center in the casing.

    Te sleeve is designed to be the

    inexpensive and replaceable part.

    It is easier and less expensive tochange a sleeve than the whole

    shaft. Users who have packing in

    their pump consider the sleeve a

    must-have design feature.

    In 1905, the mechanical seal

    as we know it was invented, but

    it was not commonly used until

    after World War II. Fifty years

    ago, most centrifugal pumps in

    industrial and commercial services

    stil l had packed stuffi ng boxes.

    Pumps with mechanical sealswere uncommon and expensive.

    Later in the 1970s, many users

    began to use simple mechanical

    seals because of safety concerns,

    stricter Environmental Protection

     Agency (EPA) regulations, and the

    cost of both lost product and flush

    fluids. Tese simple seals were

    eventually displaced by component

    type mechanical seals. Prudent

    pump users continued to use

    the existing shaft sleeve designsbecause the component seals

    were held in place by tightening a

    number of set screws. Te torqued

    set screw points damaged the shaft

    sleeve surface. Tese “dog marks”

    (damaged metal surfaces) from

    the set screws were an accepted

    negative side effect because of

    the shaft sleeve’s status as an

    inexpensive and replaceable part.

    In recent years, most pump users

    have switched to cartridge-type

    mechanical seals. Most present-day

    designs will not damage the shaft

    or shaft sleeve during instal lation,

    operation and subsequent removal

    from service. Even O-ring fretting

    of the shaft or shaft sleeve iseliminated in most new designs.

    By Jim Elsey

    Summit Pump, Inc.

    Solid Shaft Designs & Cartridge Seals

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

    18

    Simple solutions for end users

    Figure 1. An example of stiffness ratiocalculations ( Graphics courtesy of  the author  )

    Figure 2. An example of a sleeved pumpshaft design with ample diameter tomaintain a low stiffness ratio

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    21/60

    When the American Voluntary Standards

    (AVS) pumps and the forerunners ofthe modern ANSI pump (B73.1M) were

    designed in the late ’50s and early ’60s,

    packed stuffi ng boxes were standard. If

    these pumps were to be redesigned today,

    they would use cartridge-type mechanical

    seals, and the design length of the shaft

    from the radial bearing to the impeller

    would be shorter.

     When a packed pump is operating, the

    packing acts like an additional line bearing

    because of the hydrodynamic properties

    of the close clearances between the shaftsleeve and the packing. Tis “consequential

    and beneficial phenomenon” mitigates shaft

    deflection caused by any unequal radial

    forces acting on the impeller.

    Without packing around the shaft (for

    example, when a seal is used), the shaft

    will deflect more, especially if the pump

    is not operating near the best effi ciency

    point/best operating point (BEP/BOP).

    Pump operation at or near shutoff (far left

    side of the curve) and at runout conditions

    (far right side of the curve) away from thepreferred operating region results in shaft

    deflection, which causes premature bearing

    and mechanical seal face wear, shortening

    the life of these critical components.

    Te ability of a shaft to resist deflection

    is a direct function of the overhung length

    and the shaft diameter. Tis is commonly

    referred to as the shaft stiffness ratio,

    shaft deflection ratio, or the L over D ratio

    (L3 / D4). Te lower the ratio number, the

    better the shaft wi ll resist deflection. Te

    formula for calculating the ratio factoris based on the simple cantilevered beam

    deflection formula.

    Many of the factors in the beam

    deflection formula cancel each other out

    when applied to an overhung pump shaft.

     As a result, the revised formula is simply

    the length (L) of the shaft as measured from

    the centerline of the radial bearing position

    to the centerline of the impeller (take L to

    the third power) divided by the diameter

    of the shaft in this area (D) to the fourth

    power, or L3 / D4 (see Figure 1).

    Measure Flowfrom Outsidethe Pipe

    Designed for dirty or aerated liquidslike wastewater,slurries, sludgeand liquids with

    bubbles or solids

    Non-Contacting Flow Measurement 

    and Control 

    888-473-9546 [email protected]

    www.greyline.com

    Works with a clamp-on sensor for pump

    protection, flow control and high or low flowalarms. bargraph displays flow rateThe LEDand relay state.

    DFS 5.1 Doppler Flow Switch

    Low-Flow or No-Flow

    Pump Protection

    DFM 5.1 Doppler Flow Meter 

    The clamp-on ultrasonic sensor installs inminutes without shutting down flow. Start-upis easy with the built-in keypad and simplemenu system.

        C    i   r   c    l   e    1    1    3   o   n   c   a   r    d   o   r   v    i   s    i   t   p   s    f   r   e   e    i   n    f   o .   c   o   m .

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

    19

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    22/60

    COMMON PUMPING MISTAKES

     A smaller shaft diameter results in

    a higher stiffness ratio, which is nota desired attribute. Without delving

    into a protracted formula derivation,

    the strength of the shaft material is of

    little importance, but the modulus of

    elasticity (Young’s modulus) does come

    into play. Most common shaft materials

    share similar ranges for the modulus of

    elasticity. If pump shafts are breaking,

    the cause is usually cyclic fatigue, not

    material strength. So a stronger material

    is not the answer, but preventing or

    reducing deflection is.

    When a pump is purposely designed

    to incorporate a shaft sleeve, the

    original shaft diameter in the packing

    and mechanical seal area is typically

    machined down to a smaller diameter

    of some incremental distance (D) to

    accommodate the corresponding sleeve.

    Some manufacturers’ processes design

    and machine the shaft differently. Eitherway, the end result is that the shaft has

    a smaller diameter on the overhung

    portion. Te smaller diameter yields

    a higher shaft deflection ratio, which

    means the shaft will deflect more for a

    given radial force. More deflection will

    result in deleterious effects on the seal

    and bearings.

    Note that the presence of the sleeve

    does not contribute to the stiffness

    factor, no matter how tight the fit. Te

    sleeve is not an integral part of the

    shaft and does not become a factor in

    the equation.

    In the past, most pump shafts

    were generously over-designed/sized

    to transmit some amount of torque

    (horsepower) at some speed range, but

    most shafts were not designed for high

    side loads (like belt or chain drives) and

    cyclic fatigue factors. Current designsare taking these side load factors more

    into consideration.

    Current Practices

    Many pump owners continue to use old

    design shaft sleeves when using new

    design cartridge mechanical seals. Tere

    are some good reasons, such as corrosion/

    erosion mitigation, for continuing this

    practice. In most cases, however, there

    is no other reason than “that is the

    way we have always done it.” I would

    say that, for a given system (curve) and

    the consequential pump operation on

    its curve, the pump life would be much

    longer if the shaft design was solid versus

    sleeved. Te pump would be more reliable,

    and the mean time between failure and

    repair (MBF/R) would be longer.

    Circle 116 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

    20

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    23/60

    In some modern OH-1 pump models,

    the incorporation of a shaft sleeve isby design and is an acceptable practice

    because the shaft deflection ratio is

    already very low as a result of a generous

    shaft diameter in the sleeve area. X-17

     ANSI pumps (ANSI sizes A105, 110 and

    120) are one example (see Figure 2,

    page 18).

     Many pump manufacturers also

    offer solid pump shafts that are made

    of different materials in the wetted

    (sacrificial) versus non-wetted areas.

    Furthermore, most ANSI pump

    manufacturers offer an optional shaft of

    larger diameter for given midrange sizes

    (for example, M, or medium-sized shaft

    and bearing systems, versus L, or large

    sized, models).

    Even with sleeve construction, the

    deflection ratio between the two models

    of different shaft diameters is significant.

    Te difference between the smaller (M)sleeved shaft and a larger (L) solid shaft

    is dramatic.

     ANSI B73.1M has set tolerances for

    allowable shaft deflection at the stuffi ng

    box area of the shaft over the allowable

    operating range.

    Pumps in compliance with this

    specification are not allowed more than

    0.002 inches of deflection. Simply

    looking at the L/D ratios is one way

    to evaluate the pump, but it is equally

    important to calculate the radial loads for

    your specific operation and the resultant

    shaft deflection.

    Shaft runout, or total indicator

    reading, with a sleeve design is harder tocontrol because of the added surfaces and

    associated tolerances. Te allowable shaft

    runout on a solid shaft is 0.001 inches

    and 0.002 inches for a sleeved shaft. As

    a final design note, any sleeve design

    needs to allow for thermal expansion and

    contraction.

    Even when we know we should

    implement change, some habits are hard

    to break.

     Are you operating your overhung

    pumps with cartridge seals and still

    using shaft sleeves? I would like to

    hear why.

    Jim Elsey is a mechanical engineer who has focused on rotating equipment design and

    applications for the military and several large original equipment manufacturers for 43

    years. He is the general manager for Summit Pump, Inc., and the principal of MaDDog

    Pump Consultants LLC. Elsey may be reached at [email protected].

    Circle 121 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

    21

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    24/60

    An intelligent pump is

    more than a pump; the

    product is a combination

    of a pump, process instrument(s)

    and variable frequency drive

    (VFD) with related intelligenceembedded in the microprocessor

    motherboard. While variable speed

    drives (VSDs)—both mechanical

    and electronic—have been applied

    to pumps for decades, the drives

    on intelligent pumps were the first

    commercially available VFDs that

    used pump protection logic to alert

    end users during upset conditions.

    oday, several manufacturers offer

    intelligent pumps with vary ing

    performance monitoring andasset protection capabilities. An

    intelligent pump also typically

    includes standard process control

    functions, such as proportional-

    integral-derivative control (PID)

    and power (kilowatt) consumption

    monitoring.

    Te first intelligent pump was

    introduced near the beginning

    of the new millennium. Tis

    technology has been instrumental

    in changing many facets of thepump industry. One change has

    been the development of a new

    understanding that control valves

    do not have to be the de facto

    flow control device for pump

    systems. Embedding pump

    intelligence into VFDs also has

    led to the view that the pump—

    along with the instrumentation

    and control valves—is a key

    component of industrial

    automation architecture.

     Advantages ofIntelligent Pumping

    From a process control standpoint,

    the primary difference between

    a VFD and a control valve is that

    the VFD electronically changesmotor speed to maintain flow,

    pressure, level or temperature at

    set-point, while the control valve

    mechanically adjusts its opening to

    meet process control requirements.

    Both approaches maintain process

    flow at the required rate but differ

    significantly in how they impact

    energy use, equipment reliability

    and process control performance.

     VFD speed reduction lowers head

    (pressure) at the square root ofspeed, while flow is reduced at the

    cube root of speed. For example,

    a small reduction in speed can

    result in a moderate head reduction

    and large energy reduction. Te

    reduction in head (pressure) and

    the accompanying reduction

    in energy usage are primarily

    the result of fully opening or

    eliminating the control valve.

    Standard and intelligent VFDs

    provide the same level of energysavings but can differ significantly

    in the amount of maintenance

    savings they provide. Embedded

    pump protection can alarm, slow

    down or turn off the pump when

    the system encounters conditions

    such as dead-heading, dry-running

    or cavitation.

    Te introduction of intelligent

     VFDs signaled the rise of variable

    speed pumping as an a lternative

    to control valves, especially in

    continuous process industries.

    For the first time, end users could

    use the electronic platform as a

    “brain” that learns and adapts

    pump performance to changing

    process conditions. Tis real-timeadaptability plays a critical role in

    achieving process sustainability

    through uptime, controllability

    and reliability improvements. An

    intelligent pump offers far more

    information about the pump’s

    performance than was ever readily

    available in the past.

    Limitations to Adoption

    While plant operators and

    engineers typically configurestandard VFDs through a keypad

    or laptop in the motor control

    center (MCC), the PID algorithm

    and control logic in the VFD are

    infrequently used. Normally, the

    control engineers opt for using the

    same control functions that found

    in the distributed control system

    (DCS). Te DCS then outputs a

    speed signal back to the VFD over

    an analog cable (4-20 mA), a step

    similar to sending an analog signalto a valve positioner to change the

    percent that it is open or closed.

    Digital bus communication can be

    used, but the majority of plants

    built before the new millennium

    use analog signals to communicate

    from the DCS to the field

    instruments and valves.

    Because the VFD and DCS are

    in different locations, operators

    and engineers are often unable

    to configure the intell igent pump

    Intelligent Pumping Continues to Evolve

    22 INDUSTRY INSIGHTS

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

    By  Mike Pemberton 

    Pumps & Systems Senior Technical Editor

    Trends & analysis for pumping professionals

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    25/60

    firmware from the DCS. Tisrestriction causes the embedded

    pump intelligence in the VFD to

    be underutilized.

    While this was an issue with

    the first generation of intelligent

    pumps, the growth of wireless

    communication, the Industrial

    Internet of Tings (IIo) and cloud

    computing have made it possible

    to overcome these limitations.

    oday, multiple parameters can

    be transmitted from the MCCto the DCS. Access to the pump-

    protection logic from the DCS can

    lead to more visibility and higher

    utilization rates.

     An alternate approach

    could be to use a third-party

    software package with the pump

    intelligence and load that program

    on the DCS. Tis could make theintelligent pump compatible with

    multiple VFD brands and different

    voltage ratings. Te end user could

    purchase the VFD separately from

    software package and combine the

    two using wired or wireless digital

    communication. In this scenario,

    the pump intelligence could access

    the DCS database as well as receive

    data from the VFD. By accessing

    data from both control elements,

    the level of intelligence couldpotentially be expanded.

    While intelligent pump

    technology has made significant

    advances in asset protection, the

    use of wireless communication,

    cloud computing and/or third-

    party software offers new

    approaches that can increase

    the availability and utilizationof pump intelligence. Te DCS

    and related information systems

    could be able to both configure

    and display multiple capabilities,

    including the following:

    • Alarm and control actions

    with data logging, time

    stamps and trends

    • Real-time pump and

    system curve visibility with

    mechanical effi ciency

    • Real-time horsepower and/or kilowatt consumption and

    specific energy

    Mike Pemberton is the senior

    technical editor for Pumps &

    Systems. He may be reached at

    [email protected].

    WHY MONITOR POWER INSTEAD OF JUST AMPS?

    NO LOAD NO LOAD

    Power is Linear-Equal Sensitivity

    at Both Low and High Loads

    No Sensitivity

    For Low Loads

    FULL LOAD FULL LOAD

         P     O     W     E     R

         A     M     P     S

     WWW.LOADCONTROLS .COM

    CALL NOW FOR YOUR FREE 30-DAY TRIAL 888-600-3247

    PROTECT PUMPS A MONITOR PUMP POWER

    TWO ADJUSTABLE SET POINTS

    4-20 MILLIAMP ANALOG OUTPUT

    COMPACT EASY MOUNTING

    UNIQUE RANGE FINDER SENSOR

    PUMP POWER

    PUMPING

    VALVE CLOSING

    VALVE OPENINGNO FLUID

    Circle 114 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

    23

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    26/60

    24

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

     

    he production of purified terephthalic acid

    (PA) poses unique challenges for centrifugal

    pumps. For increased safety and reliability, some

    facilities with this process have incorporatedcustom-engineered liquid-lubricated double seals. Tis

    new technology meets the ever-increasing product

    performance requirements of leading PA producers.

    HP reactor feed pumps—in many cases, integrally

    geared high-speed centrifugal pumps—play a vital role

    in the purification stage of crude terephthalic acid (A).

    Tese pumps deliver A slurry, which contains A powder

    suspended in demineralized water at a high temperature,

    into a hydrogenation reactor, where a reaction with

    hydrogen removes contaminants from the solution.

    PA is the predominant raw material for production

    of high-purity polyester resin, which is widely used inthe production of polyester fiber, polyethylene

    terephthalate (PE) bottle resin, polyester film and

    engineering plastics.

    Operational reliability of the HP reactor feed pumps

    is critical for maintaining stable operation of PA

    purification plants, and mechanical seals are among the

    most critical pump components because of high-speed

    and high-pressure service requirements.

    In one particular application—for one of the world’s

    largest PA producers—the selected centrifugal pump

    was configured as a horizontally mounted, integrally

    geared two-stage pump with a single double-ended output

    shaft, which operates at a rotational speed of 6,200

    revolutions per minute (rpm) with impellers attached on

    each end. Te two stages are piped up to operate in series

    to develop the required head rise, and the first-stagedischarge feeds the second-stage pump suction. Tis

    setup boosts the Stage 2 seal chamber pressure to 80 bar,

    or 1,160 pounds per square inch (psi).

    Te seals for the application were engineered as a

    cartridge-design double seal face-to-face arrangement

    for Stage 1 and as a tandem oriented face-to-back dual

    seal arrangement for Stage 2, which splits the total

    differential pressure between two seals and maintains

    suitable pressure velocity (PV) parameter levels. Te

    seal support system utilizes flush supply to both pump

    stages, which helps to protect the product side seals from

    plugging with A slurry.

    Technical Challenges

    One of the main technical challenges in this application

    pertained to the barrier/buffer fluid. Instead of using

    the more common ambient-temperature demineralized

    water as a barrier/buffer liquid that is usually supplied

    from the PA plant centralized seal-support system, the

    facility requested to use plant return water at the normal

    temperature of 70 degrees C (158 F), with a maximum

    temperature of 80 C (176 F). Te potentia l problem

    with using plant return water as barrier/buffer liquid

    under these conditions is an adverse seal environment

    SPECIAL SECTION

    PUMPS & EQUIPMENT FOR HARSH CONDITIONS

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    27/60

    25

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

    characterized by inadequate heat dissipation and poor

    lubrication of seal faces resulting from a loss of fluid film

    from vaporization.

     An additional technical challenge was reverse

    pressurization of the Stage 2 process side seal during

    pump startup and shutdown. During the startup

    sequence, this seal is reverse-pressurized by the buffer

    fluid introduced into the seal support system before

    the pump main driver is turned on. Under transient

    conditions, while the pump is ramping up to full speed

    and reaching full discharge pressure, the pressure applied

    to the seal is reversed, causing the seal to hang up. Te

    same problem occurs in opposite order during pump coast

    down to shutdown. Te original seal design was modifiedto incorporate new features to overcome seal hang-up

    associated with the secondary seal.

    Te demanding requirements of this facility required

    an application-specific solution. Once the performance

    specification had been drawn up, the development and

    design stage began. Te seal and pump manufacturers’

    teams met to analyze the operating points in detail.

    Tis provided precise performance calculations and a

    computer-aided design for the sliding elements.

    Te new double seals were based on a special

    high-pressure seal from the manufacturer’s existing

    product portfolio. Specifically, the team opted for the

    effi cient high-pressure seal. In contrast to conventional

    mechanical seals from the standard range, high-pressure

    seals have one important special feature: the seat

    rotates on the shaft while the seal face—with its spring

    backing—is stationary in the housing. Tis seal concept

    provides additional stability at high speeds. At sliding

    velocities of 20 meters per second (66 feet per second)

    or more, the springs should be stationary so they do not

    absorb vibrations and deform.

    Optimized Design

    Design improvements to the seal technology, including

    the use of ultra-high-performance materials, were made

    to guarantee stable running across the entire operatingrange. While the regular seals use silicon carbide ceramic

    material for both seal face and stationary seat, the

    stationary seal face for this application was based on the

    silicon carbide variant BuKa 30. Tis material has a high

    carbon content, making it an ideal solution for media

    with poor lubricating properties, such as water. BuKa 30

    impresses with its effective emergency running properties

    and tolerance to dry running.

    Te seal was further optimized to guarantee functional

    reliability, even in the marginal ranges. A loosely fitted

    seal face provides additional safety against tipping and

    tilting. Another technical feature of the high-pressure

    Image 1. Pump in operation (Image and graphic courtesy of EagleBurgmann)

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    28/60

    26 PUMPS & EQUIPMENT FOR HARSH CONDITIONSSPECIAL SECTION

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

    seal developed for the PA application is the

    incorporation of high-precision grooves in the seal faces.

    Te depth and geometry of these grooves were specified

    with accuracy. At low pressure, the grooves promotelift-off of the seal faces by creating a positive pressure

    cushion, and they quickly establish a stable operating

    state. At high pressure, the grooves have a stabilizing

    effect because they prevent the gap from opening further.

    Field Tested

    Combining all these measures resulted in sophisticated

    sealing systems in both tandem and back-to-back

    versions. Tese cover the range of applications up to 100

    bar (1,450 psi) and 9,000 rpm and ensure functional

    reliability. Te liquid-lubricated double seals cope with all

    operating parameters, and constant sealing performanceis reliable, even when exposed to considerable pressure,

    temperature and speed fluctuations.

    Te seals, which are designed as easy-to-fit cartridge

    systems, were extensively tested and confirmed in

    dynamic test runs in the test field. Te new double seals

    have also proven their worth in the many integrally

    geared pumps that were bought into service in China in

    2014 in one of the world’s largest PA facilities.

    Andreas Pehl is technical sales support for mechanical

    seal applications at EagleBurgmann

    Germany in Wolfratshausen. He joined

    EagleBurgmann in 2010. He has a degree in

    industrial engineering from the University

    of Applied Sciences, Munich. For more

    information, visit eagleburgmann.com.

    Figure 1. Double seal in tandem arrangement. Theyellow parts are rotating, blue are stationary, andgray shows the shaft and housing.

    Circle 137 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.Circle 139 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    29/60

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

    27

    n the sealing industry, compatibility influences the

    ability to form a chemically stable system. Using

    the wrong hydraulic fluid could result in a violent

    reaction that is disastrous for the entire hydraulic

    assembly. Te fix is not simple; it could cost thousands of

    dollars in repairs and lost production time. o avoid these

    problems, users should ensure that the lip material or

    sealing material is compatible with planned media. Any

    biodegradable upgrades or media improvements must

    also be compatible with the sealing elastomer.

    Each year the U.S. uses about 200 million gallons

    of hydraulic oils. Of this volume, approximately 165

    million gallons are mineral-based fluids. Tese types

    of mineral-based oils function at temperatures as low

    as -40 C to as high as 150 C with some exceptions.

    When choosing the right fluid, it is essential to assess

    physical and performance properties along with any

    original equipment manufacturer (OEM) approvals or

    specifications. Most fluid suppliers should be able to

    provide a product data sheet so that the design engineercan discern the best solution for the application.

    Mineral-based fluids include specialty fire-resistant

    hydraulic fluids and environmentally friendly,

    biodegradable fluids. Te International Organization for

    Standardization (ISO) acknowledges four major groups

    of fire-resistant hydraulic fluids: high-water containing

    fluids (HFA), invert emulsions (HFB), water glycols (HFC)

    and water-free fluids including synthetics (HFD).

     Along with being fire-resistant, the chemical

    characteristics of HFA fluids are almost identical to that

    of plain water. As a result, this type of fluid is typically

    used in equipment that has been intended for use with

    water and is subjected to an open flame. HFA fluids

    are most commonly used in steel mills and coal mines.

    However, because these are fire-resistant fluids and not

    fire-proof fluids, HFA fluids can still ignite and burn,

    given the right conditions.

    HFB fluids are made up of emulsions of water caught

    in oil with 60/40 oil-to-water composition. Tis type offluid can sometimes perform to the level of petroleum oil

    and offers greater lubrication and corrosion resistance

    compared with HFA fluids. Its water content also acts as

    an extinguisher in case of a fire.

    Te most frequently used fire-resistant hydraulic

    fluid category is water glycols (HFC). While these fluids

    are comprised of only 35-45 percent water, they also

    include unique thickeners that boost viscosity. While

    HFC fluids can be used to run equipment designed for

    oil, severe damage to machine parts can occur due to an

    overwhelming environment if the speeds, temperatures

    or pressures are not monitored properly.

    SPECIAL SECTION

    Image 1. It is important to consider how hydraulic fluids will af fectthe hydraulic seal. (Graphics courtesy of Colonial Seal Company)

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    30/60

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

    28 SPECIAL SECTION

    HFD fluids are classified as synthetic

    because they contain neither petroleum

    oil nor water. Polyol esters have an

    organic makeup that is biodegradable.HFD fluids are also compatible with

    system materials and provide exceptional

    hydraulic fluid performance. However,

    HFD fluids are more than double the cost

    of petroleum oil and are typically only

    used when the situation demands fire

    resistance and biodegradability.

    Because governments have become

    more vigilant with environmental

    regulations, it is increasingly important

    to use a more eco-friendly fluid. For a

    product to be labeled an “environmentallyacceptable fluid,” more than half of it

    must decay within 28 days of exposure

    to the atmosphere. Te fluid must be

    nontoxic after passing a series of aquatic

    toxicity tests on fish. Te most common

    base for these environmental fluids is

    vegetable oil (or more specifically canola/

    rapeseed oil). Although they cannot

    be used as a direct replacement, the

    lubrication and anti-wear properties will

    be comparable to those of petroleum oil.

    While eco-friendly fluids are becomingmore available, the problem is that none

    of the current options can be used as

    a direct replacement in hydraulically

    powered equipment. Tere are drawbacks

    to using a minimally toxic hydraulic fluid.

    Tese fluids may be more vulnerable to

    oxidation and have a poor performance

    record in extreme cold weather, resulting

    in coagulation and problems cold

    starting. o increase stability and prevent

    problems with viscosity, vegetable

    oil producers have turned to geneticengineering to al leviate problems with

    biodegradable fluids.

    If a plant decides to change the

    hydraulic fluid used in an assembly,

    personnel must consider the

    compatibility of the replacement fluid

    with the internal components of the

    machinery, ensuring that the seal lip

    material is compatible with the chosen

    application media. Tese materials range

    from standard nitrile Buna rubber, Viton

    and ethylene propylene diene monomer

    Circle 130 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

    Circle 127 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

    Variable Speed Controls for Pumps

    When a standard off the shelf drive will not meet your needs, KB will work

    with you to develop a custom drive solution, Ready to Use “Out-of-the-Box.”

    Provides variable speed control for AC Induction, DC, PMSM and EC motors, 1/50 to 5 HP.

    115, 208/230, 400/460 VAC – 50/60 Hz 1ø and 3ø Input.

    KB Electronics, Inc.12095 NW 39th Street, Coral Springs, FL 33065-2516

    Designed and

     Assembled in USA 

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    31/60

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

    29

    rubber to polytetrafluoroethylene

    (otherwise known as eflon).

    Understanding how a seal material will

    interact with various fluids is the first

    step to finding the right match.

    When choosing hydraulic

    oil, consider both viscosity and

    temperature. o prevent early internal

    component failure, the viscosity grade

    must match the operating temperature.

    Te quality of the hydraulic should not

    be a factor; if it is not compatible, a

    system failure could result.

    If the operating temperature of a

    hydraulic system is below the suggestedlevel for the viscosity grade, the fluids

    can congeal. Solidified oil will not

    flow freely through the system, which

    can cause component seizures. Te

    solidification can cause media to lose

    the ability to lubricate the hydraulic

    piston and increase the coeffi cient of

    friction undergone by the seal lip. Te

    increased wear and heat will cause the

    seal lip to quickly deteriorate.

    When switching to an eco-fr iendly

    hydraulic fluid, be prepared fordifferent results from the interaction

    of the seal lip material and the fluid.

    Eco-friendly fluids can cause a shorter

    life for a traditional nitrile seal.

    Fluorocarbon is the best material

    for users who go this route. Always

    check with the fluid supplier before

    switching. Because biodegradable fluids

    have a different chemistry composition

    than petroleum-based fluids, the

    interaction with the seal lip materials

    could be an issue.

    In a real-world example, a user

    experiencing premature hydraulic

    seal failure thought he had been sent

    either the wrong seal or the incorrect

    seal material. Te seal provider

    discovered that the user had switched

    to a fire-resistant hydraulic fluid so

    that he could create a safer working

    environment. No research was doneon how this change would impact

    his machinery and its components,

    including the seal.

    Te result was that the ethylene

    propylene diene monomer seal was

    not compatible with the new fluid.

    Te seal was absorbing the fluid at an

    accelerated rate, causing the seal lip to

    swell. Tis swelling caused increased

    wear on the seal, resulting in decreased

    seal life and unacceptable leakage.

    Contact your fluid or seal supplier forreference charts. Tey will have first-

    hand compatibility knowledge.

    Table 1. Fire-resistant hydraulic fluids and their features

    ISOClassification

    Makeup H2OContent

    ISOTemperatureRange

    Comments

    HFA High-watercontaining

    fluids

    Less than80%

    5 to 50 C Chemical characteristics aresimilar to water.

    HFB Invertemulsions

    Less than40%

    5 to 50 C Because of its water content,it can act as an extinguishershould a fire occur.

    HFC Waterglycols

    Less than35%

    -20 to 50 C The most commonly usedhydraulic fluid

    HFD Water-freefluids,includingsynthetics

    None -20 to 70 C The chemical makeup issynthetic, and the fluidcontains no water or oil and issafe for the aquatic ecosystem.

    Circle 123 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

    Stephen A. Maloney founded Colonial Seal Company in 1994. He retired as a colonel

    in the U.S. Marine Corps in 2008. He has a Bachelor of Science in management

    and technology from the U.S. Naval Academy and a Master of Science in systems

    management from the University of Southern California.

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    32/60

    ecause of the complicated nature of pump

    flow and pressure control, industrial plants

    have often incorporated control of complex

    pumping and related systems using distributedcontrol systems (DCSs) or expensive specialized

    controllers. In the past, many programmable logic

    controllers (PLCs) were not up to the task, so engineers

    and designers turned to DCSs or similar controllers,

    which, in some cases, can lead to higher costs and

    complex implementation.

    oday, new alternatives allow monitoring and control

    of these complex systems with programmable automation

    controllers (PACs), saving considerable expense and

    simplifying implementation.

    Te PAC, or PLC-based PAC, fills the gap between the

    DCS and basic PLC. It has the hardware and softwarerequired to monitor, control and communicate with these

    pumping systems (see Figure 1, page 32).

     Advanced Process Control

    Complex pumping systems often require advanced

    process control (APC), which goes beyond proportional-

    integral-derivative (PID) control and can include methods

    such as model predictive control, inferential control and

    sequential control.

    PID is sometimes insuffi cient because the process that

    needs to be controlled has a long dead time, is non-linear

    or presents other diffi cult ies.

     Various APC control methods and algorithms are

    supported in DCS platforms but not in most PLCs.

    PLC-based PACs, on the other hand, can execute many

     APC algorithms and typically have some built-in APC capability.

    Some APC methods require complex custom coding, a

    programming technique supported by DCS platforms but

    not by most PLCs. Te PLC-based PAC solves this problem

    because it allows users to create custom code, encapsulate

    it and integrate it into the overall controller program.

    When APC is required, a PLC-based PAC provides many

    of the capabilities of a DCS but at a lower cost and with

    simpler implementation. Pushing a basic PLC to perform

     APC is impossible in some cases, and even high-end

    PLCs can require an extraordinary amount of effort to

    implement APC.

    Interfacing to Instruments

    Pumping systems for applications such as custody

    transfer often contain a large number of instruments

    and analyzers. ypical instrument types include flow,

    pressure, temperature and density. Many of these

    instruments are multivariable, measuring several

    parameters at once. Modern pumping systems often

    employ smart instruments with a built-in, two-way

    digital data link, rather than simple instruments with

    a 4- to 20-milliamps (mA) output proportional to the

    measured variable.

     

    30 COVER  S E R I E S SMART PUMPING

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    33/60

    For example, custody transfer applications often use

    mass flow meters because they can precisely measure

    the amount of liquids transferred from one owner to

    the next regardless of product density. Coriolis meters

    measure multiple variables including flow, density and

    temperature and are most commonly used to measure

    mass flow.Tese variables are sent to the control system along

    with diagnostic, calibration and other information.

     A typical Coriolis meter used in custody transfer will

    transmit hundreds of parameters to the control system

    over a digital data link, presenting data storage and

    handling chal lenges.

    Plants often employ analyzers to measure parameters

    related to the chemical composition of oil and other liquid

    hydrocarbons. Like smart instruments, analyzers are

    usually connected to the control system via a two-way

    digital data link and often transmit more than a hundred

    parameters to the control system.

    Complex pumping systems commonly employ smart

    valves. Like smart instruments and analyzers, smart

    valves communicate large amounts of data with the

    control system over two-way digital data links.

     A DCS will have built-in communication capabilities

    for a number of the process control protocols used by

    smart instruments, smart valves and analyzers. While aPLC will have more limited communications capabilities,

    a PLC-based PAC will have an extensive array of built-in

    communication ports and protocols, with the ability to

    expand through plug-in communication modules.

    Data Handling

    Smart instruments, smart valves and analyzers

    produce large amounts of data (see Image 1). A DCS

    can handle the storage and processing of this data, but

    a PLC generally cannot. A PLC-based PAC provides the

    needed data capabilities at a lower cost and with simpler

    implementation than a DCS.

    Image 1. Each of these smart Coriolismass flow meters provides hundredsof parameters of information relatedto measurement, diagnostics andcalibration. A PLC-based PAC iswell-suited to interface with theseinstruments and to handle the largevolumes of data they produce. (Images

    courtesy of AutomationDirect.com)

    31

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    34/60

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    35/60

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    36/60

    erman company ICL-IP Bitterfeld

    GmbH has been producingphosphorus-based flame retardant

    since 1997. Its plant in Bitterfeld-

    Wolfen employs about 80 people. Many of the

    steps in the production process—from the

    phosphorus and chlorine starting materials

    to the final products (phosphate ester)—

    involve exothermic reactions. Much of the

    released heat is led away in water-cooled heat

    exchangers. A centralized cooling tower runs

    almost continuously—about 8,250 hours per

    year—to provide the required cooling water.

    Water temperature varies seasonally from19 to 25 degrees C. Te flow rate can be as

    high as 1,100 cubic meters per hour (m3/h),

    resulting in a cooling capacity of up to 6

    megawatts (MW).

    In 2011, plant managers analyzed

    the processes in the cooling tower. Tey

    discovered that the three cooling water

    pumps running in parallel ran continuously

    against throttle flaps, even under partial-load

    conditions and reduced thermal loads in the

    plant. It resulted in an unfavorable hydraulic

    operating point and poor effi ciency.

     

    Image 1. The three cooling water pumps with a capacity of 360 cubic meters per hour andmaximum delivery head of 52 meters ( Images courtesy of Dr. Kurt-Christian Tennstädt )

    34 COVER   S E R I E S SMART PUMPING

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    37/60

    Termal utilization of the cooling tower

    normally fluctuates between 50 and 100

    percent as a result of seasonal factors andvaried usage by individual consumers

    during normal operations. Average

    utilization is about 70 percent.

    Energy Effi ciency a Core Concern

     A 2014 company-wide program to improve

    energy effi ciency systematically identified

    additional weak points in how energy is

    used. For the cooling water pumps, new

    motors and speed control with frequency

    converters produced significant savings.

    With this foundation, ProductionManager Dr. Jürgen K. Seifert developed a

    technical concept for controlling the three

    pumps in a way that adapts to the cooling

    water’s continually changing needs while

    eliminating the ineffi cient method of using

    throttle flaps. Before implementation,

    multiple simulations indicated a high

    potential for savings with a projected

    return on investment (ROI) of two years.

    Te pump control is central to the

    new concept. Te system utilizes three

    frequency converters and includes cascadefunctionality. Te 75-kilowatt (kW) IE4+

    synchronous reluctance motors achieve an

    effi ciency of 96 percent, an improvement

    over previous motors (built in 1996) with

    about 90 to 92 percent effi ciency. Tey

    even run effi ciently under partial load. As

    a result, procurement costs are amortized

    in two to three years. Experience in a

    previous round of optimizations showed

    that converting control over the cooling

    tower fans to frequency converters also

    achieved significant savings.

    Frequency Converters Replace

    Manual Intervention

    In the past, the pumps ran at a constant

    1,450 liters per minute (l/min). Tey were

    regulated with throttle flaps located at

    the pump outlet on the discharge side.

    Tis configuration brought the pumps

    into the performance curve range where

    the drive motors were not overloaded

    (counterpressure at the consumer side is

    only about 3.5 bar at full hydraulic load).

    Vapor Recovery? LPG Transfer? Natural Gas Boosting?

    The answer is the FLSmidth® Ful-Vane™ rotary vane compressor!

    Built robustly for long service life, it has only three moving parts. Combined with low operating speeds

    which minimizes wear and vibration, it is designed to not only outlast other compressors, but save you

    money on power and maintenance costs.

    • Suitable for natural gas, flare gas, bio gases, LPG vapor, and ammonia refrigeration

    • Carbon fiber vanes last longer than traditional blades

    • Variable flows with VFD and/or bypass

    • Single stage to 3000 SCFM, two-stage to 1800 SCFM

    • Discharge pressures to 250 PSIG

    • Made in the USA for over 80 years

    Simple, Reliable

    Efficient

    Find out more at www.flsmidth.com/compressors

    Circle 126 on card or visit psfreeinfo.com.

    Image 2. At the main cooling tower, the fourth pump at the far right is a reserve pumpand it is not automatically included in control.

    35

    pumpsandsystems.com | February 2016

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    38/60

    While this type of control can destroy energy, it is

    usually unavoidable in situations that consist of a fixed-speed pump and a system with low counterpressure. In

    this case, the throttle flaps helped hold the pressure at

    a constant 4.8 bar at the pump outlet, regardless of the

    actual need for coolant. Tis achieved a constant power

    consumption at the motors of 68 to 75 kW, at which

    point each pump was expected to stabilize near its rated

    capacity of 360 m3/h.

     As an initial energy-saving measure after the analysis,

    one or two pumps were switched off during partial-load

    operations, such as when consumers (heat exchangers)

    were turned off. But this approach is diffi cult because

    the remaining pumps must be monitored continuously

    to make sure they do not become overloaded. If loads

    suddenly change, engineers must be prepared to

    undertake rapid manual interventions.

    Frequency converters help solve this problem by

    replacing manual, inconsistent on/off control with a

    continuous, intelligent adaptation of pump speeds to

    the actual need for cooling water. As a result, manual

    interventions are no longer needed. Te pumps are

    synchronized and run continuously in their optimal

    range, and pump discharge pressure remains constant.

    Te cascade feature automatically switches pumps on and

    off as requirements change on the consumer side.

    Smooth Switch

    Te facility completed the practical execution of theupgrade in close contact with the pump supplier. Te

    manufacturer has long developed intelligent controllers

    for cooling water pumps in systems where the need

    for cooling water frequently changes, whether due to

    fluctuating cooling water temperature or because of

    varying loads imposed by the process.

    Because of this experience, the manufacturer was

    able to quickly provide a suitable solution for the plant.

    “Only rarely have I experienced such a smooth project

    execution,” Dr. Seifert said about the experience at the

    plant. “Tey immediately understood our concept and

    executed it with precision.”

    Te upgrade and reconditioning of the three water

    pumps was completed within the facility’s one-week

    production downtime window. Te manufacturer even

    recalculated the impellers and replaced them with the

    maximum size impellers. Te optimized impellers, which

    are driven at the optimal speed, allow the pumps to

    achieve an effi ciency of 85.3 percent.

     After only one month, the power costs for the cooling

    tower were several thousand euros lower than before.

    Because of this success, the facility has short-term plans

    to convert other pumps with dynamic requirements to

    this control concept.

    Image 3. The numerous heat exchangers at various locations in the plantare connected to the main cooling tower with lines of different lengths.This places elevated demands on the intelligence of the pump controller.A specific minimum preliminary pressure must be ensured even at themost distant cooler and in every operating state. Pump output and speedare displayed on the control panel.

    CASE STUDY AT A GLANCE

    Challenge

    • Significantly reduce energy costs

    • Convert the entire cooling system within one week

    • Flexible pump speed with constant dischargepressure to all consumers

    • Elimination of valves; no change to coolingreliability at full load, even if one pump fails

    Solution

    • Use frequency converters to control the pumps forprecise adaptation of capacities to current need forcoolant

    • Optimization of impellers in the centrifugal pumps

    Results

    • Energy savings of more than 80 percent

    • Several thousand euros saved after just one month

    • Savings in operation of the cooling tower

    • Efficiency of all pumps increased to 85.3 percent

    36 COVER   S E R I E S SMART PUMPING

    February 2016  | Pumps & Systems

  • 8/18/2019 Pump & System - Feb 2016

    39/60

      otentialfor Savings

    In

    many

    cases, energy consumption in

    such

    systems plays only a secondary

    role

    and

    is

    often

    neglected. Even

    at the

    Bitterfeld plant,

    energy

    costs make up a

    comparatively

    small proportion of overall

    production costs. But

    the

    new controller

    reduced power requirements for cooling by

    50 to

    60

    percent, or

    about 1,000

    megawatt

    hours (MWh) yearly. The investment paid

    for

    itself

    within one year,

    faster

    than

    predicted by

    the

    simulations. Even when

    all

    three

    pumps are

    running under

    full

    load,

    energy

    requirements drop from 75

    to 37

    kW

    per pump

    . The

    energy required

    to run

    the

    cooling

    tower

    now

    accounts

    for

    a much smaller proportion of

    the total

    energy

    consumption of the plant . All

    of

    the

    money that is saved flows

    directly

    into

    operating

    results

    .

    The

    Bitterfeld plant

    demonstrates

    the

    potential for savings that

    can be found

    in

    industrial systems with oversized pumps

    that

    were

    dimensioned

    and installed years

    ago with excess reserves . In

    this

    case,

    the

    energy

    savings totaled

    more

    than 80

    percent

    . As prices for

    frequency converters

    drop

    and the

    technology

    becomes

    more

    accessible,

    the

    use

    of