2
A pH-stable Ruthenium(II)-based Sensing System for Dissolved Dinitrogen Tetsuro Kizaki, 1 Takeru Abe, 1 Takahiro Matsumoto, 1,2 and Seiji Ogo* 1,2 1 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyushu University, 744 Moto-oka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395 2 Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Kawaguchi Center Building, 4-1-8 Honcho, Kawaguchi 332-0012 (Received November 17, 2009; CL-091015; E-mail: ogotcm@mail.cstm.kyushu-u.ac.jp) Building on a previous design for a Ru-based dissolved N 2 sensor, we report an adaptation that allows for reversible data storage. The N 2 complex can be xedand made stable across a range of pHs by the substitution of OH ¹ with F ¹ to form [Ru II (F)(TMC)(N 2 )] + (1, TMC = 1,4,8,11-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11- tetraazacyclotetradecane). The addition of Ca 2+ and irradiation with light at high pH removes the F ¹ , thereby regenerating the sensor in its reversible conguration. In a recent publication, we reported a Ru-based complex [Ru II (OH) 2 (TMC)] (C, TMC = 1,4,8,11-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11- tetraazacyclotetradecane) that is capable of colorimetrically sensing N 2 dissolved in aqueous solutions at N 2 partial pressures as low as 0.01 MPa. 1 This complex was based on a Ru II center coordinated to a TMC macrocycle, with the crucialfeature of two hydroxo ligands in the axial positions. These hydroxo ligands could be sequentially protonated at successively lower pHs to form the corresponding complexes with aqua ligands [Ru II (OH)(H 2 O)(TMC)](PF 6 ) {[B](PF 6 )}, and [Ru II (H 2 O) 2 - (TMC)](PF 6 ) 2 {[A](PF 6 ) 2 }. 1 Such protonation destabilized the N 2 complex, essentially switching othe sensor. It should be noted that the dihydroxo complex C was so sensitive to N 2 that it could be only observed under an Ar atmosphere. 1 In an eort to stabilize the sensor across all pHs, we substituted one of the OH ¹ ligands with a F ¹ ligand. We considered that hard ligand capableof strong ³ donation would produce a complex with chemical behavior similar to that of [Ru II (OH)(TMC)(N 2 )](PF 6 ) {[D](PF 6 )}, 1 without being liable to deactivation by protonation. Hereafter, we report the characterization and synthesisof the water-soluble, Ru-based, N 2 complex, [Ru II (F)(TMC)(N 2 )](PF 6 ) {[1](PF 6 )},with a F ¹ ligand coordinated to the Ru II center. We also describe its ability to reversibly store N 2 concentration data. Asingle crystal of [1](BF 4 )¢H 2 O suitable for X-ray analysis was obtained by the addition of NaBF 4 to an aqueous solution of [1](PF 6 ). 2 The structure of [1] + is shown inFigure 1. The Ru II center adopts a distorted octahedral coordination surrounded by one TMC, one F ¹ , and one N 2 ligand with a Ru1-N3 length of 1.847(5) ¡, a Ru1-F1 length of 2.015(3) ¡, and a Ru1-N3-N4 angleof 176.3(5)°. The N3-N4 length of 1.144(8) ¡ in 1 is slightly longer than that offree N 2 (1.098 ¡), 3 which is consistent with back-donation of electron density from the t 2g orbital of Ru II to the ³* anti-bonding orbital of N 2 . The N-N bond length in 1 is comparable to that in the N 2 complex D {1.128(6) ¡} and longer than those in most Ru II N 2 complexes. This is the rst example of a water-soluble, F ¹ -coordinated, N 2 complex. The IR spectrum of [1](PF 6 ) in the solid state shows a sharp band at 2064 cm ¹1 typical of ¯(NN) 4-8 in an end-on fashion (Figure S1 in Supporting Information). 9 The lowering of the ¯(NN) relative to that offree N 2 (2331 cm ¹1 ) 10 is in agreement with a weakening of the N-N bond in comparison to the free N 2 molecule. The ¯(NN) in 1 is comparable to that in D (2050 cm ¹1 ), 1 which indicates the axial F ¹ ligand is not different from the OH ¹ ligand with respect to the electroniceect on the stretching vibration of N 2 . However, the behavior of 1 toward the change of pH is quite different from D. The IR spectra of aqueous solutions of [1](PF 6 ) show a sharp band at 2069 cm ¹1 , responsible for the ¯(NN), and is observed at pH 2.0-14.0. This result demonstrates that the structure of 1 remains over a wide pH range. Conversely, the N 2 complex D releases N 2 at pH 2.0-10.0 although the structure is stable at pH 10.0-14.0. 1 Complex 1 with Ca 2+ was irradiated with halogen light (YAMAZEN YHL-500S without any filter, 500 W) in water at pH 11.0 at 25 °C for 6h under a N 2 atmosphere to give D and CaF 2 (Figure S2 in Supporting Information). 9,11 Figure S2a shows the positive-ion electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrum of 1 in water at pH 11.0 before irradiation. The prominent signal at m/z 405.3 {relative intensity (I) = 100%in the range of m/z 100-2000} has a characteristic isotopic distribution (Figure S2b) that matches well with the calculated isotopicdistribution for [1] + (Figure S2c). After irradiation, the prominent signal at m/z 405.3 was shifted to the prominent signal at m/z 403.3 (Figure S2d), which has a characteristic isotopic distribution (Figure S2e) that matches well with the calculated isotopicdistribution for [D] + (Figure S2f). At Figure 1. An ORTEP drawing of [1] + with ellipsoids at 30% probability. The counter anion (BF 4 ¹ ), the solvent (H 2 O), and the hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected interatomicdistances (l/¡) and angles (º/degree): N3-N4 = 1.144(8), Ru1-N1 = 2.126(4), Ru1-N3 = 1.847(5), Ru1-F1 = 2.015(3), Ru1-N3-N4 = 176.3(5), F1-Ru1-N3 = 177.6(2), N1-Ru1-N2 = 85.99(17), N1-Ru1-N1* = 93.61(17), N2-Ru1-N2* = 93.71(16). Published on the web January 16, 2010 128 doi:10.1246/cl.2010.128 © 2010 The Chemical Society of Japan Chem. Lett. 2010, 39, 128-129 www.csj.jp/journals/chem-lett/

Published on the web January 16, 2010 - uni-muenchen.de · 2012-02-02 · A pH-stable Ruthenium(II)-based Sensing System for Dissolved Dinitrogen Tetsuro Kizaki,1 Takeru Abe,1 Takahiro

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Published on the web January 16, 2010 - uni-muenchen.de · 2012-02-02 · A pH-stable Ruthenium(II)-based Sensing System for Dissolved Dinitrogen Tetsuro Kizaki,1 Takeru Abe,1 Takahiro

A pH-stable Ruthenium(II)-based Sensing System for Dissolved Dinitrogen

Tetsuro Kizaki,1 Takeru Abe,1 Takahiro Matsumoto,1,2 and Seiji Ogo*1,21Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Graduate School of Engineering, Kyushu University,

744 Moto-oka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-03952Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST),

Kawaguchi Center Building, 4-1-8 Honcho, Kawaguchi 332-0012

(Received November 17, 2009; CL-091015; E-mail: [email protected])

Building on a previous design for a Ru-based dissolved N2

sensor, we report an adaptation that allows for reversible datastorage. The N2 complex can be “fixed” and made stable acrossa range of pHs by the substitution of OH¹ with F¹ to form[RuII(F)(TMC)(N2)]+ (1, TMC = 1,4,8,11-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane). The addition of Ca2+ and irradiationwith light at high pH removes the F¹, thereby regenerating thesensor in its reversible configuration.

In a recent publication, we reported a Ru-based complex[RuII(OH)2(TMC)] (C, TMC = 1,4,8,11-tetramethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane) that is capable of colorimetricallysensing N2 dissolved in aqueous solutions at N2 partial pressuresas low as 0.01MPa.1 This complex was based on a RuII centercoordinated to a TMC macrocycle, with the crucial feature oftwo hydroxo ligands in the axial positions. These hydroxoligands could be sequentially protonated at successively lowerpHs to form the corresponding complexes with aqua ligands[RuII(OH)(H2O)(TMC)](PF6) {[B](PF6)}, and [RuII(H2O)2-(TMC)](PF6)2 {[A](PF6)2}.1 Such protonation destabilized theN2 complex, essentially “switching off” the sensor. It should benoted that the dihydroxo complex C was so sensitive to N2 that itcould be only observed under an Ar atmosphere.1

In an effort to stabilize the sensor across all pHs, wesubstituted one of the OH¹ ligands with a F¹ ligand. Weconsidered that hard ligand capable of strong ³ donation wouldproduce a complex with chemical behavior similar to that of[RuII(OH)(TMC)(N2)](PF6) {[D](PF6)},1 without being liable todeactivation by protonation.

Hereafter, we report the characterization and synthesis of thewater-soluble, Ru-based, N2 complex, [RuII(F)(TMC)(N2)](PF6){[1](PF6)}, with a F¹ ligand coordinated to the RuII center. Wealso describe its ability to reversibly store N2 concentration data.

A single crystal of [1](BF4)¢H2O suitable for X-ray analysiswas obtained by the addition of NaBF4 to an aqueous solution of[1](PF6).2 The structure of [1]+ is shown in Figure 1. The RuII

center adopts a distorted octahedral coordination surrounded byone TMC, one F¹, and one N2 ligand with a Ru1­N3 length of1.847(5)¡, a Ru1­F1 length of 2.015(3)¡, and a Ru1­N3­N4angle of 176.3(5)°. The N3­N4 length of 1.144(8)¡ in 1 isslightly longer than that of free N2 (1.098¡),3 which is consistentwith back-donation of electron density from the t2g orbital of RuII

to the ³* anti-bonding orbital of N2. The N­N bond length in 1 iscomparable to that in the N2 complex D {1.128(6)¡} and longerthan those in most RuIIN2 complexes. This is the first exampleof a water-soluble, F¹-coordinated, N2 complex.

The IR spectrum of [1](PF6) in the solid state shows a sharpband at 2064 cm¹1 typical of ¯(N≡N)4­8 in an end-on fashion

(Figure S1 in Supporting Information).9 The lowering of the¯(N≡N) relative to that of free N2 (2331 cm¹1)10 is in agreementwith a weakening of the N­N bond in comparison to the freeN2 molecule. The ¯(N≡N) in 1 is comparable to that in D(2050 cm¹1),1 which indicates the axial F¹ ligand is not differentfrom the OH¹ ligand with respect to the electronic effect on thestretching vibration of N2. However, the behavior of 1 towardthe change of pH is quite different from D. The IR spectra ofaqueous solutions of [1](PF6) show a sharp band at 2069 cm¹1,responsible for the ¯(N≡N), and is observed at pH 2.0­14.0.This result demonstrates that the structure of 1 remains over awide pH range. Conversely, the N2 complex D releases N2 atpH 2.0­10.0 although the structure is stable at pH 10.0­14.0.1

Complex 1 with Ca2+ was irradiated with halogen light(YAMAZEN YHL-500S without any filter, 500W) in water atpH 11.0 at 25 °C for 6 h under a N2 atmosphere to give Dand CaF2 (Figure S2 in Supporting Information).9,11 Figure S2ashows the positive-ion electrospray ionization (ESI) massspectrum of 1 in water at pH 11.0 before irradiation. Theprominent signal at m/z 405.3 {relative intensity (I) = 100% inthe range of m/z 100­2000} has a characteristic isotopicdistribution (Figure S2b) that matches well with the calculatedisotopic distribution for [1]+ (Figure S2c). After irradiation, theprominent signal at m/z 405.3 was shifted to the prominentsignal at m/z 403.3 (Figure S2d), which has a characteristicisotopic distribution (Figure S2e) that matches well withthe calculated isotopic distribution for [D]+ (Figure S2f). At

Figure 1. An ORTEP drawing of [1]+ with ellipsoids at 30%probability. The counter anion (BF4¹), the solvent (H2O), and thehydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. Selected interatomic distances(l/¡) and angles (º/degree): N3­N4 = 1.144(8), Ru1­N1 = 2.126(4),Ru1­N3 = 1.847(5), Ru1­F1 = 2.015(3), Ru1­N3­N4 = 176.3(5),F1­Ru1­N3 = 177.6(2), N1­Ru1­N2 = 85.99(17), N1­Ru1­N1* =93.61(17), N2­Ru1­N2* = 93.71(16).

Published on the web January 16, 2010128doi:10.1246/cl.2010.128

© 2010 The Chemical Society of JapanChem. Lett. 2010, 39, 128­129 www.csj.jp/journals/chem-lett/

Page 2: Published on the web January 16, 2010 - uni-muenchen.de · 2012-02-02 · A pH-stable Ruthenium(II)-based Sensing System for Dissolved Dinitrogen Tetsuro Kizaki,1 Takeru Abe,1 Takahiro

pH 10.0­14.0, the irradiation of the aqueous solution of 1 andCa2+ with halogen light gave D. Complex D reacted with F¹ inwater at pH 10.0­14.0 to form 1.

Figure 2 shows UV­vis spectra of the aqueous solutions ofA at pH 2.0, B at pH 7.0, D at pH 12.0, and 1 at pH 12.0,respectively. The UV­vis spectra of D and 1 exhibit intensebands at 235 and 228 nm, respectively, assigned to the RuII­N2

metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) transition,4­7 and theshoulders around 310 nm, assigned to d­d transition.12

Complex D is stable in water at pH 10.0­14.0, however, D

releases N2 to give A via B and C by decreasing pH from 10.0 to2.0. In contrast to D, 1 is stable in water over a wide range of pH.

Figure 3 summarizes the pH-dependent properties of all fiveRuII complexes. The structure of A is changed to B by raisingthe pH. Complex B, via a short-lived dihydroxo complex C, cancoordinate to N2 at pHs above 10 at 25 °C for 1min to formcomplex D. Adding F¹ to D forms complex 1 which is stableover a wide range of pH. Complex 1 can then be reverted to Dby the simple application of Ca2+ ions and light.

This behavior could potentially be used for reversible datastorage of dissolved N2 sensor information. As a first step,complex C would behave as a N2 sensor at pH 10.0­14.0.Adding F¹ would then lock this data and protect it againsterasure by protonation. To unlock the data, Ca2+ ions and lightwould be applied at high pH and the data could then be erasedby lowering the pH. All of the chemical processes describedabove have been performed in the laboratory and so relativelylittle work is required to develop this system for data recording.We expect the principles at work here will allow a wide varietyof new applications.

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid: Nos. 17350027,17655027, 18033041, and 18065017 (Chemistry of ConcertoCatalysis), the Global COE Program, “Science for FutureMolecular Systems” from the Ministry of Education, Culture,Sports, Science and Technology, Japan and the Basic ResearchPrograms CREST Type, “Development of the Foundation forNano-Interface Technology” from JST, Japan.

References and Notes1 T. Kizaki, T. Matsumoto, S. Ogo, Dalton Trans. 2010, in press.

doi:10.1039/b918940h2 The crystal data for [1](BF4)¢H2O have been deposited with Cam-

bridge Crystallographic Data Center as a supplementary publicationNo. CCDC-753963.

3 a) P. G. Wilkinson, N. B. Houk, J. Chem. Phys. 1956, 24, 528.b) P. G. Wilkinson, Can. J. Phys. 1956, 34, 250.

4 a) A. D. Allen, C. V. Senoff, Chem. Commun. 1965, 621. b) A. D.Allen, F. Bottomley, R. O. Harris, V. P. Reinsalu, C. V. Senoff, J. Am.Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5595. c) A. D. Allen, F. Bottomley, Acc. Chem.Res. 1968, 1, 360.

5 a) D. E. Harrison, H. Taube, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 5706.b) D. F. Harrison, E. Weissberger, H. Taube, Science 1968, 159, 320.c) H. A. Scheidegger, J. N. Armor, H. Taube, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968,90, 3263. d) C. Creutz, H. Taube, Inorg. Chem. 1971, 10, 2664.e) I. M. Treitel, M. T. Flood, R. E. Marsh, H. B. Gray, J. Am. Chem.Soc. 1969, 91, 6512.

6 a) L. A. P. Kane-Maguire, P. S. Sheridan, F. Basolo, R. G. Pearson,J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 5295. b) L. A. P. Kane-Maguire, P. S.Sheridan, F. Basolo, R. G. Pearson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 5865.

7 a) T. Takahashi, K. Hiratani, E. Kimura, Chem. Lett. 1993, 1329.b) T. Takahashi, K. Hiratani, K. Kasuga, E. Kimura, Chem. Lett. 1993,1761. c) K. Okamoto, T. Takahashi, K. Kohdate, H. Kondoh, T.Yokoyama, T. Ohta, J. Synchrotron Rad. 2001, 8, 689.

8 a) J. P. Collman, P. S. Wagenknecht, J. E. Hutchison, Angew. Chem.,Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1537. b) M. Hidai, Y. Mizobe, Chem. Rev.1995, 95, 1115. c) S. C. Lee, R. H. Holm, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A. 2003, 100, 3595. d) M. D. Fryzuk, S. A. Johnson, Coord.Chem. Rev. 2000, 200­202, 379.

9 Supporting Information is available electronically on the CSJ-JournalWeb site, http://www.csj.jp/journals/chem-lett/index.html.

10 H. P. Wang, J. T. Yates, Jr., J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 852.11 W. Weber, P. C. Ford, Inorg. Chem. 1986, 25, 1088.12 a) V. I. Baranovskii, N. V. Ivanova, A. B. Nikol’skii, J. Struct. Chem.

1973, 14, 115. b) C.-M. Che, K.-Y. Wong, C.-K. Poon, Inorg. Chem.1986, 25, 1809.

Figure 2. UV­vis spectra of the aqueous solutions of A at pH 2.0, Bat pH 7.0, D at pH 12.0, and 1 at pH 12.0 under a N2 atmosphere.

Figure 3. pH-dependent properties of all five RuII complexes.Interconversion of 1 to D proceeds in the reaction of [1](PF6)(100¯M) with CaSO4 (3.0mM) in water in the range of pH 10.0­14.0with halogen light at 25 °C for 6 h under a N2 atmosphere. Intercon-version of D to 1 proceeds in the reaction of [D](PF6) (100¯M) withNaF (100mM) in water in the range of pH 10.0­14.0 at 25 °C under aN2 atmosphere for 18 h in the dark. Reversible interconversionbetween A and D via B and C has been previously reported.1

129

© 2010 The Chemical Society of JapanChem. Lett. 2010, 39, 128­129 www.csj.jp/journals/chem-lett/