Upload
archibald-phillips
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Public Workshop Public Workshop
Airborne Toxic Control Measure Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM) for Motor Vehicle and (ATCM) for Motor Vehicle and
Mobile Equipment CoatingsMobile Equipment Coatings
Public Workshop Public Workshop
Airborne Toxic Control Measure Airborne Toxic Control Measure (ATCM) for Motor Vehicle and (ATCM) for Motor Vehicle and
Mobile Equipment CoatingsMobile Equipment Coatings
May 9, 2001May 9, 2001
California Environmental Protection AgencyAir Resources Board
AgendaAgendaAgendaAgenda Introductions
General Information on Toxics Program
Background Information
Summary of Draft Regulation
Project Schedule
Q&A
AB 1807AB 1807AB 1807AB 1807
Established California’s Air Toxics
Program
Established a two-phase process for
the identification and control of air
toxics
Toxic Air Contaminant Toxic Air Contaminant (AB 1807)
“...an air pollutant which may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or in serious illness, or which may pose a present or potential hazard to human health.”
Program FrameworkProgram Framework AB 1807 - A Two-Phase ProgramAB 1807 - A Two-Phase Program
Risk assessment - formal identification of toxic Risk assessment - formal identification of toxic air contaminantsair contaminants
Risk management - develop needs report/ Risk management - develop needs report/ control measurescontrol measures
Steps of Identification Process
Public Hearing Board Decision to List as a TAC
SuspectedToxic Substance
OEHHA Evaluates Health Effects
Draft ReportPublic Workshops
ScientificReview Panel
ARB AssessesExposure
Assessment of TAC Sources
Assessment of TAC Sources
Prioritize ControlOptions
Prioritize ControlOptions
PublicWorkshops
PublicWorkshops
Draft ReportOn Control Measures
Draft ReportOn Control Measures
Board Decision toAdopt Control Measure
Board Decision toAdopt Control Measure
APCDs Implementand Enforce
Control Measure
APCDs Implementand Enforce
Control Measure
Public HearingPublic Hearing
Public WorkshopsPublic Workshops
Steps of Risk Management Phase
Hexavalent Chromium and Cadmium
Hexavalent Chromium and Cadmium
Hexavalent chromium and cadmium
are used in automotive coatings
Used as a color pigment and as a
corrosion inhibitor
Emitted as metal particulates
Why Control Hexavalent Chromium ?
Why Control Hexavalent Chromium ?
Hexavalent chromium is one of the most
toxic compounds identified by ARB
Minimal emissions can lead to significant
risk
Removal of hexavalent chromium will
reduce the need for public notification and
risk reduction plans
What are the Current Restrictions on Hexavalent
Chromium?
What are the Current Restrictions on Hexavalent
Chromium? Some air districts have rules that reduce
hexavalent chromium emissions
SCAQMD prohibits the use of coatings
that contain hexavalent chromium
VCAPCD requires chromium-containing
coatings to be sprayed inside a spray booth
Feasibility of ProposalFeasibility of Proposal
Alternative coatings are readily available
and widely used
Surveys show minimal usage of coatings
containing hexavalent chromium and
cadmium
Draft RegulationDraft Regulation
Applicability
Exemptions
Standards
Compliance timelines
ApplicabilityApplicability
ATCM applies to manufacturers and
distributors of motor vehicle and mobile
equipment coatings
ATCM also applies to auto bodyshops and
other facilities that use motor vehicle and
mobile equipment coatings
ExemptionsExemptions
ATCM does not apply to motor vehicle or
mobile equipment coatings used outside of
California
The exemption does not apply to coatings
sold to retail outlets in California
StandardsStandards
Coatings containing hexavalent chromium
and cadmium cannot be sold in California
No motor vehicle or mobile equipment
coating facility may use or possess a coating
containing hexavalent chromium or cadmium
Each coating container subject to this rule
must be code dated
TimelinesTimelines
Coatings manufactured before the effective
date of the regulation may be sold for six
months after the effective date
End users may use non-complying coatings
for 12 months after the effective date
Project ScheduleProject Schedule
Final Staff Report in early August, 2001
Board Hearing on September 20-21, 2001
Office of Administrative Law review
completed approximately March, 2002
Regulation “Effective Date”