Public Goods and Externalities, By Tyler Cowen_ the Concise Encyclopedia of Economics _ Library of Economics and Liberty

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

dgfhhjkkvc

Citation preview

  • 1/19/2016 PublicGoodsandExternalities,byTylerCowen:TheConciseEncyclopediaofEconomics|LibraryofEconomicsandLiberty

    http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/PublicGoodsandExternalities.html 1/3

    FullSite

    PublicGoodsandExternalitiesbyTylerCowenAbouttheAuthor

    SearchCEE

    M

    Home|CEE|1stedition|PublicGoodsandExternalities

    [AnupdatedversionofthisarticlecanbefoundatPublicGoodsinthe2ndedition.]

    osteconomicargumentsforgovernmentinterventionarebasedontheideathatthe

    marketplacecannotprovidepublicgoodsorhandleexternalities.Publichealthandwelfareprograms,education,roads,researchanddevelopment,nationalanddomesticsecurity,andacleanenvironmentallhavebeenlabeledpublicgoods.

    Publicgoodshavetwodistinctaspects"nonexcludability"and"nonrivalrousconsumption."Nonexcludabilitymeansthatnonpayerscannotbeexcludedfromthebenefitsofthegoodorservice.Ifanentrepreneurstagesafireworksshow,forexample,peoplecanwatchtheshowfromtheirwindowsorbackyards.Becausetheentrepreneurcannotchargeafeeforconsumption,thefireworksshowmaygounproduced,evenifdemandfortheshowisstrong.

    Thefireworksexampleillustratesthe"freerider"problem.Evenifthefireworksshowisworthtendollarstoeachperson,noonewillpaytendollarstotheentrepreneur.Eachpersonwillseekto"freeride"byallowingotherstopayfortheshow,andthenwatchforfreefromhisorherbackyard.Ifthefreeriderproblemcannotbesolved,valuablegoodsandservices,onesthatpeoplewantandotherwisewouldbewillingtopayfor,willremainunproduced.

    Thesecondaspectofpublicgoodsiswhateconomistscallnonrivalrousconsumption.Assumetheentrepreneurmanagestoexcludenoncontributorsfromwatchingtheshow(perhapsonecanseetheshowonlyfromaprivatefield).Apricewillbechargedforentrancetothefield,andpeoplewhoareunwillingtopaythispricewillbeexcluded.Ifthefieldislargeenough,however,exclusionisinefficientbecauseevennonpayerscouldwatchtheshowwithoutincreasingtheshow'scostordiminishinganyoneelse'senjoyment.Thatisnonrivalrouscompetitiontowatchtheshow.

    Externalitiesoccurwhenoneperson'sactionsaffectanotherperson'swellbeingandtherelevantcostsandbenefitsarenotreflectedinmarketprices.Apositiveexternalityariseswhenmyneighborsbenefitfrommycleaningupmyyard.IfIcannotchargethemforthesebenefits,Iwillnotcleantheyardasoftenastheywouldlike.(Notethatthefreeriderproblemandpositiveexternalitiesaretwosidesofthesamecoin.)Anegativeexternalityariseswhenoneperson'sactionsharmanother.Whenpolluting,factoryownersmaynotconsiderthecoststhatpollutionimposesonothers.Policydebatesusuallyfocusonfreeriderandexternalitiesproblems,whichareconsideredmoreseriousproblemsthannonrivalrousconsumption.

    Whilemostpeopleareunawareofit,marketsoftensolvepublicgoodsandexternalitiesproblemsinavarietyofways.

    PRINTEMAILCITECOPYRIGHTSHARE

    SearchtheCEE

    Browsethe1steditionCEE

    bytitle

    byauthor

    bycategory

    Biographies

    Browsethe2ndeditionCEE

    bytitle

    byauthor

    bycategory

    Biographies

    AbouttheCEE

    FrequentlyAskedQuestions

    FAQsaboutSearchingCEE

    EconlibResourcesAboutEconlibContactEconlibQuoteoftheDayBirthdays&CommemorationsFrequentlyAskedQuestionsGetEconlibNewsletter

    Articles EconLog EconTalk Books Encyclopedia Guides Search

  • 1/19/2016 PublicGoodsandExternalities,byTylerCowen:TheConciseEncyclopediaofEconomics|LibraryofEconomicsandLiberty

    http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/PublicGoodsandExternalities.html 2/3

    Businessesfrequentlysolvefreeriderproblemsbydevelopingmeansofexcludingnonpayersfromenjoyingthebenefitsofagoodorservice.Cabletelevisionservices,forinstance,scrambletheirtransmissionssothatnonsubscriberscannotreceivebroadcasts.Boththroughouthistoryandtoday,privateroadshavefinancedthemselvesbychargingtollstoroadusers.Othersupposedpublicgoods,suchasprotectionandfireservices,arefrequentlysoldthroughtheprivatesectoronafeebasis.

    Publicgoodscanalsobeprovidedbybeingtiedtopurchasesofprivategoods.Shoppingmalls,forinstance,provideshopperswithavarietyofservicesthataretraditionallyconsideredpublicgoods:lighting,protectionservices,benches,andrestrooms,forexample.Chargingdirectlyforeachoftheseserviceswouldbeimpractical.Therefore,theshoppingmallfinancestheservicesthroughreceiptsfromthesaleofprivategoodsinthemall.Thepublicandprivategoodsare"tied"together.Privatecondominiumsandretirementcommunitiesalsoareexamplesofmarketinstitutionsthattiepublicgoodstoprivateservices.Monthlymembershipduesareusedtoprovideavarietyofpublicservices.

    Lighthousesareoneofthemostfamousexamplesthateconomistsgiveofpublicgoodsthatcannotbeprivatelyprovided.Economistshavearguedthatifprivatelighthouseownersattemptedtochargeshipownersforlighthouseservices,afreeriderproblemwouldresult.YetlighthousesoffthecoastofnineteenthcenturyEnglandwereprivatelyowned.Lighthouseownersrealizedthattheycouldnotchargeshipownersfortheirservices.Sotheydidn'ttryto.Instead,theysoldtheirservicetotheownersandmerchantsofthenearbyport.Portmerchantswhodidnotpaythelighthouseownerstoturnonthelightshadtroubleattractingshipstotheirport.Asitturnsout,oneoftheeconomicsinstructors'mostcommonlyusedexamplesofapublicgoodthatcannotbeprivatelyprovidedisnotagoodexampleatall.

    Otherpublicgoodsproblemscanbesolvedbydefiningindividualpropertyrightsintheappropriateeconomicresource.Cleaningupapollutedlake,forinstance,involvesafreeriderproblemifnooneownsthelake.Thebenefitsofacleanlakeareenjoyedbymanypeople,andnoonecanbechargedforthesebenefits.Oncethereisanowner,however,thatpersoncanchargehigherpricestofishermen,boaters,recreationalusers,andotherswhobenefitfromthelake.PrivatelyownedbodiesofwaterarecommonintheBritishIsles,where,notsurprisingly,lakeownersmaintainquality.

    Welldefinedpropertyrightscansolvepublicgoodsproblemsinotherenvironmentalareas,suchaslanduseandspeciespreservation.Thebuffalonearedextinctionandthecowdidnotbecausecowscouldbeprivatelyownedandhusbandedforprofit.Today,privatepropertyrightsinelephants,whales,andotherspeciescouldsolvethetragedyoftheirnearextinction.InAfrica,forinstance,elephantpopulationsaregrowinginZimbabwe,Malawi,Namibia,andBotswana,allofwhichallowcommercialharvestingofelephants.Since1979Zimbabwe'selephantpopulationrosefrom30,000toalmost70,000today,andBotswana'swentfrom20,000to68,000.Ontheotherhand,incountriesthatbanelephanthuntingKenya,Tanzania,andUganda,forexamplethereislittleincentivetobreedelephantsbutgreatincentivetopoachthem.Inthosecountrieselephantsaredisappearing.TheresultisthatKenyahasonly16,000elephantstodayversus

  • 1/19/2016 PublicGoodsandExternalities,byTylerCowen:TheConciseEncyclopediaofEconomics|LibraryofEconomicsandLiberty

    http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/PublicGoodsandExternalities.html 3/3

    140,000whenitsgovernmentbannedhunting.Since1970,Tanzania'selephantherdhasshrunkfrom250,000to61,000Uganda'sfrom20,000toonly1,600.

    Propertyrightsarealesseffectivesolutionforenvironmentalproblemsinvolvingtheair,however,becauserightstotheaircannotbedefinedandenforcedeasily.Itishardtoimagine,forinstance,howmarketmechanismsalonecouldpreventdepletionoftheearth'sozonelayer.Insuchcaseseconomistsrecognizethelikelynecessityofaregulatoryorgovernmentalsolution.

    Contractualarrangementscansometimesbeusedtoovercomeotherpublicgoodsandexternalitiesproblems.Iftheresearchanddevelopmentactivitiesofonefirmbenefitotherfirmsinthesameindustry,thesefirmsmaypooltheirresourcesandagreetoajointproject(antitrustregulationspermitting).Eachfirmwillpaypartofthecost,andthecontributingfirmswillsharethebenefits.Inthiscontexteconomistssaythattheexternalitiesare"internalized."

    Contractualarrangementssometimesfailtosolvepublicgoodsandexternalitiesproblems.Thecostsofbargainingandstrikinganagreementmaybeveryhigh.Somepartiestotheagreementmayseektoholdoutforabetterdeal,andtheagreementmaycollapse.Inothercasesitissimplytoocostlytocontactanddealwithallthepotentialbeneficiariesofanagreement.Afactory,forinstance,mightfinditimpossibletonegotiatedirectlywitheachaffectedcitizentodecreasepollution.

    Theimperfectionsofmarketsolutionstopublicgoodsproblemsmustbeweighedagainsttheimperfectionsofgovernmentsolutions.Governmentsrelyonbureaucracyandhaveweakincentivestoserveconsumers.Therefore,theyproduceinefficiently.Furthermore,politiciansmaysupplypublic"goods"inamannertoservetheirowninterests,ratherthantheinterestsofthepublicexamplesofwastefulgovernmentspendingandporkbarrelprojectsarelegion.Governmentoftencreatesaproblemof"forcedriders"bycompellingpersonstosupportprojectstheydonotdesire.Privatesolutionstopublicgoodsproblems,whenpossible,areusuallymoreefficientthangovernmentalsolutions.

    AbouttheAuthor

    TylerCowenisaneconomicsprofessoratGeorgeMasonUniversityanddirectoroftheJamesM.BuchananCenterandoftheMercatusCenter.

    FurtherReading

    Benson,Bruce.TheEnterpriseofLaw.1990.

    Cowen,Tyler.TheTheoryofMarketFailure:ACriticalEvaluation.1988.

    Klein,Daniel."TieinsandtheMarketProvisionofPublicGoods."HarvardJournalofLawandPublicPolicy10(Spring1987):45174.

    McCallum,SpencerHeath.TheArtofCommunity.1970.

    Rothbard,MurrayN.ForaNewLiberty.1978.

    Woolridge,WilliamC.UncleSam.MonopolyMan.1970.

    Returntotop