PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORT PARTICIPATORY PROJECT TO … public consultation report participatory project to revise the urban development master plan of the town of rosemÈre june 2020

PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORTPARTICIPATORY PROJECT TO REVISE THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN OF THE TOWN OF ROSEMÈRE

JUNE 2020

PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORT

PARTICIPATORY PROJECT ON THE URBANISTIC VISION (PHASE 3)

TOWN OF ROSEMÈRE

JUNE 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION

PART 1: PRESENTATION OF THE PROJECT

1.1 CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW OF THE MANDAT1.2 STAGES OF THE PROJECT1.3 METHODOLOGY

PART 2: RESULTS OF THE ACTIVITIES

2.1 RESULTS OF THE FOCUS GROUPS2.2 RESULTS OF THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES2.3 RESULTS OF THE MEETING WITH THE BUSINESS

COMMUNITY

PART 3: HIGHLIGHTS

APPENDICES

A OVERALL PLANNING CONCEPT B CONSULTATION FORMS USED ON FEBRUARY 19, 2020 C CONSULTATION FORMS USED ON FEBRUARY 22, 2020 D CONSULTATION FORMS USED ON FEBRUARY 26, 2020

101011

203254

62

8

TOWN OF ROSEMERE | PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORT | JUNE 2020 5

© Provencher_Roy

PART 1PRESENTATION OF THE

PROJECTContext and overview of the mandate

Stages of the projectMethodology

INTRODUCTION

The Town of Rosemère—the Town—is at a decisive moment in its development and certain areas within its bounds are likely to be transformed in the coming years. To ensure that it is on the right track and to provide a good framework for these transformations, the Town has embarked, in 2018, on a large-scale exercise to revise its Master Plan. Indeed, 1,672 participants have been consulted since the beginning of the process (vision and infrastructure survey, public consultations, focus groups, etc.). As a plan that is to guide all urban development for the next 10 years, the revised Master Plan must contain clear directions and objectives, based on a bold vision that's consistent with the citizens' aspirations.

For this, the Town consulted with the residents to identify possible solutions or concrete actions to be implemented in the Master Plan over the next few years, be it with regard to particular sectors or specific themes.

As part of a third phase of public consultations to revise Rosemère’s Master Plan, residents were invited to express their views on these proposed solutions. This report includes a compilation of these residents’ responses and aims to provide the reader with the project’s highlights as well as the opinion expressed by the entire population consulted on this subject. The report is divided into three parts, each corresponding to a main activity carried out in the third phase of the public consultation: the results of the resident focus groups; the results of the public consultation activities (roundtables and pop-up kiosks); and the results of the workshop with the business community.

This public consultation report outlines the aspirations of Rosemerites expressed on land use planning. This report does not set out the municipal council's position on this urban planning vision. Council's position can be found in a separate document available on the City's website.


ABOUT US

The firm Provencher_Roy brings together more than 300 interdisciplinary professionals working in urban planning and design as well as architecture and interior design.

The firm is resolutely committed to a sustainable development approach that integrates urban design, planning and regulation projects in a unique process of co-creation with the communities. In this respect, the content of urban planning provisions tends toward solutions that are adapted to the various intervention environments and hence beneficial at the social, economic and environmental levels.


1.1 CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW OF THE MANDATE

The firm Provencher_Roy was mandated in 2019 by the Town of Rosemère to support it in finding possible solutions for its future, and to do so in the context of and in consideration of the revision of the Town’s Master Plan. The mandate was essentially to conduct the third phase of the public consultation, aimed at establishing a collective vision of the Master Plan. As part of this, Provencher_Roy undertook to:

• support the Town in the development of the content of the public consultation;

• organize and facilitate the public consultation (phase III);

• write the present report.

1.2 STAGES OF THE PROCESS

The content of the new Master Plan had been clarified step by step since May 2018, and the urban vision, alongside its orientations and objectives, had already been validated with the population over the previous years during the first two phases of the public consultation. A diagnostic profile of the territory had also highlighted the main issues of the territory, both from an urban and socio-demographic point of view.

PHASE 1: VISION

SurveyPublic consultation

Focus groupsConsultation report

DIAGNOSTICAnalysis of the territory,

the population and residents’ concerns

Main issues

PHASE 2: ORIENTATIONS & OBJECTIVES

Public consultations Focus groupsSurvey

Stakeholder meetingsConsultation report

March - June 2018

October 2018 – January 2019

February – May 2019

PHASE 3: : DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT AND POSSIBLE

SOLUTIONSPublic consultations

Focus groupsSurvey

Stakeholder meetingsConsultation report

Winter 2020

REVISED MASTER PLAN

To be determined

Looking forward

The possible solutions proposed to the residents were drawn from this content, that is to say, from the issues of the territory, the residents’ concerns previously expressed and the orientations and objectives already stated.

During this third phase of public consultation, the following activities were organized and held:

• Two targeted focus groups with residents about a first version of proposed solutions—October 23 and 24, 2019;

• Workshops (open to the general public) on the solutions envisaged for the two main areas of focus—a village hub and a regional hub—and a plenary voting session - February 19, 2020;

• Public consultation in the form of thematic pop-up kiosks, giving residents the opportunity to respond to the solutions proposed for the entire town - February 22, 2020;

• Consultation with the business community, giving them the opportunity to respond to the solutions proposed for the two main project sections - February 26, 2020.


1.3 METHODOLOGY

In keeping with the Town’s public participation policy, as well as respecting the work already undertaken previously, over the past two years, the resident consultation activities were to allow for the co-construction, with all stakeholders, of the revised Rosemère Master Plan. More specifically, Phase III of the public consultation aimed, among other things, to:

• Inform all residents of Rosemère of the revision process of the Master Plan;

• Present the findings and issues that emerged from the analysis of the territory in a transparent and objective manner;

• Promote and encourage the participation of a variety of stakeholders;

• Allow residents to express their opinions, concerns and expectations regarding the future of the city.

The participatory approach developed by the firm Provencher_ Roy was intended to be neutral, inclusive and productive. To promote inclusiveness, strategies were deployed to reach out to groups who tend to be underrepresented at public consultation and to encourage the expression of diverse points of view. Activities aimed at the general public were also organized on two occasions to enable as many residents as possible to attend.

All residents of Rosemère received a bilingual Participant’s Workbook to enable them to prepare for the activities and to learn about the process and the activities in progress. This guide included the following elements:

• Information on the public consultation activities;

• A glossary of terms related to the Master Plan;

• A reminder of Rosemère’s vision statement;

• A reminder of the activities undertaken and the process underway;

• Major trends in planning;

• The orientations and objectives of the vision;

• Possible solutions concerning the project’s village and regional hubs with regard to the various themes, as well as conceptual plans illustrating them.

VISION URBANISTIQUE URBANISTIC VISION

Une ville fière, verte et prospèreA proud, green and prosperous town

Consultations publiques | Public consultations

Excerpt from the Participant’s Workbook distributed to the residents of RosemèreSource: Town of Rosemère, 2020


FOCUS GROUPS 19 Participants Les groupes de discussion ont permis de constituer des groupes représentatifs de la diversité de Rosemère et de couvrir un large éventail de points de vue, notamment ceux qui sont plus difficiles à rejoindre en consultation publique. Deux groupes de discussion se sont ainsi déroulés les soirées du mercredi 23, et du jeudi 24 octobre 2019 de 19h à 21h, en présence d’une animatrice de Provencher_Roy et du Directeur des communications, des affaires publiques et des relations avec les citoyens de la Ville de Rosemère. Les participants ont été filmés et entendus en temps réel dans une autre salle où se trouvaient les membres du conseil. Ceci avait pour but de ne pas influencer le discours des citoyen(ne)s qui participaient aux groupes de discussion.

POP-UP KIOSKS 175 Participants The public consultation held on Saturday, February 22, 2020 drew many residents around four thematic kiosks, each staffed by a facilitator from Provencher_Roy and a civil servant from the Town of Rosemère. The kiosks allowed visitors to get a clear idea of the issues and proposed solutions. This set-up allowed residents to express themselves freely on a variety of subjects, without time constraint, while benefitting directly from the expertise of the facilitators. They were also invited to express their approval or disapproval of the various proposed solutions using stickers and post-its on panels, while justifying their comments.

MEETING WITH THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY 25 Participants

The meeting with the business community, held on the morning of February 26, 2020, brought together 25 professionals (including residents and non-residents) concerned with their work environment. Drawn from the network of members of AGAR (Association des gens d’affaires de Rosemère), these people met to discuss issues affecting the economy, urban development and mobility in Rosemère. A number of issues were raised during this two-hour meeting, which followed the same format as the roundtable workshop of February 19. Their contribution, complementing what the residents had to say at the roundtable, allowed to consolidate and deepen the observations already made during the first two events and to fine-tune the understanding of certain issues.

ROUNDTABLE WORKSHOP 192 Participants

Of all the events, this form of public consultation drew the most residents, with nearly 192 attendees. At this event, held on the evening of February 19, 2020, residents were able to express their opinions on the proposed solutions for project’s two main areas of focus (village and regional hubs). Seated at round tables, the self-organized groups had the opportunity to express their agreement or disagreement with the proposals a flip chart while given the opportunity to ask questions to members of the Town Council, professionals from the Town of Rosemère and Provencher_Roy facilitators. The residents thus voiced their opinions about these proposals, improving them and bringing new solutions. At the end of the exercise, they voted on previously identified solutions and shared their opinions using the microphone.


FOCUS GROUP SESSIONS ON OCTOBER 23 AND 24, 2019

7:00 pm

7:10 pm

7:15 pm

Welcome of participants by the Town of Rosemère

Welcome address by Julie Bergeron, Provencher_Roy

Information session by Julie Bergeron, Provencher_Roy

▪ Overview

▪ Main orientations of the urban vision

▪ Presentation of a overall concept

▪ Discussion period on targeted questions

7:25 pm Workshop 1: Overall vision of the Town

9:00 pm Summary of discussions and closing remarks


7:45 pm Workshop 2: Village hub


8:05 pm Workshop 3: Regional hub


6:00 pm

6:30 pm

6:35 pm

7:10 pm

7:40 pm

8:35 pm

9:00 pm

9:30 pm

Welcome of residents by elected officials and representatives of the Town


Workshop 1: Village hub

Speech by Mayor Eric Westram

Workshop 2: Regional hub

Plenary assembly and collective vote

Exchange of ideas

Acknowledgements and end of meeting

▪ Objectives of the evening

▪ Main stages of the project

▪ Issues and orientations

▪ Presentation of orienting guidelines and overall planning concept

▪ Presentation of proposed solutions for specific sectors

▪ Residents are invited to comment on the various solutions proposed in response to the issues raised for the village hub. A facilitator is chosen from among the participants to coordinate the discussions at the table and to fill out the consultation forms.

▪ The facilitator now guides the exchange on the regional hub. Here, too, possible solutions are proposed in response to the various issues raised. A summary is produced, allowing to present at the assembly both the aspects that gave rise to debate and those that were the subject of a consensus.

▪ Julie Bergeron asks a dozen or so questions and asks residents to vote “for,” “against” or “undecided.” Volunteers are solicited from among the residents to explain the choice of their table in more detail.

PUBLIC CONSULTATION, FEBRUARY 19, 2020

6:40 pm Information session by Julie Bergeron, Provencher_Roy

7:00 pm Participation charter

7:05 pm Presentation of workshops (instructions and forms)

▪ About ten residents had the opportunity to share their opinions on various subjects, supporting their comments with a real-life experience or an anecdote. Given the high participation rate, not all residents had the chance to express themselves at the microphone.


9:00 am

9:00 am

Noon

Opening and welcome

Pop-up kiosks

End of event, with the last participants leaving

▪ Residents are invited to visit the different kiosks.

▪ Facilitators are present at each kiosk to answer questions and provide more information.

▪ The kiosks are divided into four themes:

1. Economy

2. Mobility

3. Urban development

4. Landscape, heritage, greening

PUBLIC CONSULTATION, FEBRUARY 22, 2020


8:30 am Reception of business people by elected officials and representatives of the Town of Rosemère

CONSULTATION WITH THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY, FEBRUARY 26, 2020

8:35 am

8:36 am


Speech by Mayor Eric Westram

▪ Objectives of the morning

▪ Main stages of the project

▪ Main issues and orientations

▪ Presentation the orienting guidelines and overall planning concept

▪ Presentation of the different planning sectors

8:40 am Information session with Julie Bergeron, Provencher_Roy

9:05 am

9:35 am

10:25 am

10:45 pm

Workshop 1: Village hub

Workshop 2: Regional hub

Plenary assembly

Acknowledgements and end of meeting

▪ The business community is invited to comment on the various solutions proposed in response to the issues raised during the presentation for the village hub. A facilitator from Provencher_Roy is chosen from among the participants to coordinate the discussions at the table and to fill out the consultation forms.

▪ The facilitator now guides the exchanges on the regional hub. Here, too, possible solutions are proposed in response to the various issues raised. A summary is produced, allowing to present at the assembly both the aspects that gave rise to debate and those that were the subject of a consensus.

▪ A representative of each table gives a brief account of the different ideas discussed and reports both the positive and negative points.

9:00 am Presentation of workshops (instructions and forms)



© Christian Gonzalez

PART 2RESULTS OF

THE ACTIVITIES2.1 RESULTS OF THE FOCUS GROUPS 2.2 RESULTS OF THE PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS 2.3 RESULTS OF THE MEETING WITH THE BUSINESS

COMMUNITY

ROAD LINKING ROLAND-DURAND

AND BOUTHILLIER BOULEVARDS

Should the Town build this link (viary and active) through the former golf

course to reduce pressure on Grande-Côte Road and improve east-west

travel?

2.1 RESULTS OF THE FOCUS GROUPS*

Workshop 1 dealt with the overall vision of the Town and was introduced by explaining the main mandate and areas of activity. It aimed to find out participants’ perceptions of two main issues concerning mobility and heritage in Rosemère: the extension of the road linking Roland-Durand and Bouthillier Boulevards and the management of the Town’s heritage to the south of Grande-Côte Road.


The main concerns with the creation of this link relate to the increase in traffic on residential streets and the increase in congestion on Roland-Durand Boulevard, with motorists seeking to avoid traffic on Autoroute 640 and Route 117. Participants are also concerned that this corridor, which runs parallel to Autoroute 640, could be used as a secondary service road. The creation of this link would eventually require some residential expropriations and would compromise the sector’s rural character while reducing natural spaces.

The residents recommend that, as a first step, traffic studies be carried out in order to assess the need for the access route as well as to compare the flows leaving the Town to the north and those passing through Grande-Côte Road during rush hour. They would also like to see improved traffic management in terms of traffic light synchronization, particularly at the exit of Autoroute 640, and the alleviation of congestion on the latter. Finally, they would like to see the integration of a greater scope and frequency of public transit.

Residents consider the conditions for the success of this link to be based on four pillars:

• Conservation of the natural environment around the access route in order to preserve the wooded environment;

• The improvement of traffic flows toward the north;

• Developing the access route exclusively for active transportation users, i.e., pedestrians and cyclists;

• Implementation of safety measures at intersections.

*This section presents a summary of the full report submitted to the Town of

Rosemère following the focus group sessions.

HERITAGE TO THE SOUTH OF

GRANDE-CÔTE ROAD

Is it desirable to restrict construction standards in the sectors south of

Grande-Côte Road to promote the conservation of trees and natural

heritage?


The main heritage concerns to the south of Grande-Côte Road can be summarized in a few points:

• Risk of losing large areas of land and trees comprising environments in need of protection;

• The risk of real estate pressure leading to the division of lots to optimize land profitability;

• The presence of flood-prone areas involving building restrictions;

• The right of owners to cut down trees to improve the quality of life;

• Lack of land for development;

• Increased traffic congestion in the area due to real estate development;

• The granting of certain undesirable derogations despite restrictive standards;

• The undesirable proliferation of buildings that are too high at the periphery of Lorraine flanking Grande-Côte Road.

Several wishes were expressed during the workshop, particularly with a view to protecting the canopy of the Town. These were, mainly, to better assess the health and dangerousness of trees, to systematically oblige the replacement of felled trees, to implement constraints on the felling of healthy trees, and to preserve existing trees as much as possible. The residents would also like to see more trees planted at Place Rosemère, shopping centres and along the streets. With respect to the preservation of the built environment, residents wish to avoid subdivisions of lots for the construction of additional buildings and to better harmonize future developments with the natural environment.

Workshop 2 focused on the consolidation of the village centre and was introduced by explaining the mandate of the village hub and the strategic sites that would present opportunities for renewal in the next few years. The workshop was aimed at validating the following aspects: (1) transition zone between the residential and commercial sectors, (2) bus lot, (3) the land between Adélard and Maria on Grande-Côte Road.

MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TYPOLOGY

BEHIND BUSINESSES

With a view to increasing the diversity of housing in Rosemère, do you think

it would be appropriate to promote multi-family housing behind the

stores?


Promoting a multi-family typology behind businesses would result in a greater diversity of housing in Rosemère. That said, residents nevertheless had reservations with regard to this typology. One is the difference in height between any new buildings and the existing built environment, and the possible impact thereof on the neighbourhood. They argue, for example, that 4- to 6-storey buildings on Grande-Côte Road would result in the rather unsightly topology of other cities on Montreal’s North Shore. The increase in traffic congestion due to multi-family real estate development is a further concern to the participants. On the other hand, they acknowledge that the development of a multi-family residential typology could be a desirable outcome, namely given the saturation of the Town’s territory and the scarcity of vacant land as well as the inaccessibility of housing for young families.

Should this proposal be pursued, the residents consider the following to be conditions for success:

• Develop well-integrated buildings that contribute to defining an interesting environment;

• Take into consideration the existing trees in the area;

• Favour densification on Labelle Boulevard by following the successful example of densification on Grande-Côte Road, near Forget Street;

• Develop affordable multi-family buildings;

• Include a social, affordable or subsidized housing offer in the development projects to be realized on the former golf course site (rather than on Grande-Côte Road) in order to achieve a social mix;

• Implement residential typologies such as duplexes and triplexes that limit tree cutting as much as possible.

THE BUS LOT

The bus lot is located in the heart of the village hub and next to the

train station. If the opportunity presented itself, how might it be best

redeveloped?

Location of the various intervention sitesSource : Google Maps, 2020


The bus lot is located in the heart of the village hub, close to the train station. Given that location, the site has significant redevelopment potential. Residents raised concerns with regard to several aspects of its redevelopment. One, assuming this site were to be redeveloped with new residential housing, is the local parking supply, which is already deemed insufficient and which would be exacerbated. The other concern, in a scenario where the site were to be added to the existing park-and-ride offer, is that the site would essentially be lost to the residents, insofar as it would then benefit primarily residents coming from the outside, such Lorraine and Bois-des-Filion. The residents also expressed concern over the possible loss of trees, which they felt need to be protected. A few residents also fear a deterioration in the quality of life in this sector and a possible increase in car dependency. Finally, the current congestion on Grande-Côte Road is also of concern to some residents, alongside the high cost of public transit trips, which is, in their opinion, detrimental to incentivizing the use of this mode of transportation.

The residents’ wishes can be summarized as follows:

• To counteract the shortage of parking spaces, the bus lot could be used to expand the existing park-and-ride lot, provided, however, that a vignette system is implemented for Rosemère residents;

• This lot could also be used to allow for residential densification with the construction of multi-family housing, based on the type of development that exists nearby on Forget Street;

• Some residents would like to see a multi-level car park that would supply all of the sector’s shops and businesses with the required parking spaces;

• Additional public transit facilities, such as a bus station, to promote active and public transit;

• The site was also considered suitable for the development of a park.

Mecanics’ shop

Bus lot

Multi-family housing

Bou

l. G

rand

e-C

ôte

THE MECHANICS SHOP BETWEEN ADÉLARD AND

MARIA STREETS

For the Town, the mechanics shop is a strategic site in the heart of the village

hub. Would it be a good idea to turn it into a public space?


The site of the mechanics shop is located at the heart of the village hub. Rather than start by voicing their concerns, residents have directly expressed their wishes regarding the redevelopment of this space. These are as follows:

• Many residents favour the acquisition of the land by the Town of Rosemère to turn it into a public square or park with a green character and offering outdoor activities.

• Some participants are less welcoming of this idea, questioning the appropriateness of a public square at this location. Instead, they emphasize how the site could serve to promote residential densification, given its centrality.

• Others, still, would like to see it used to house facilities such as an amphitheatre and other spaces for artistic and cultural activities, including outdoor kiosks and the holding of outdoor events.

RU

E DE R

OSEM

ÈRE

RU

E CO

UTU

RE

RU

E REM

EMB

RAN

CE

RU

E CO

RO

NA

RU

E CED

AR

RU

E HECTO

R

RUE DE L’ACADÉMIE

RUE LABELLE

RU

E PH

ILIPP

E

RU

E TUR

CO

TTE

RU

E MAU

RICE

DRA

LÉDA

EU

R

CHEMIN DE LA GRANDE CÔTERUE WILLOWDALE

RUE PERRAULT

RUE PINE

RU

E OVILA

UAE

NN

OB

RAH

C E

UR

RU

E SPR

ING

HILL

RU

E BR

OADW

AY

SECTEURS DE PLANIFICATION DÉTAILLÉE SCHÉMATISÉS /DETAILED PLANNING AREAS

PLAN 01 : NOYAU VILLAGEOIS / VILLAGE CENTERAxe villageois /Village axis

Lien actif / Active mobility link Secteur patrimonial / Historic sectorPiste cyclable existante incluant

les chaussées désignées / Existing bike paths including designatedroadways

Mobilité et liens de connectivité / Mobility and connection links :

Pôle d’activité / Activity center: Composantes d’intérêts / Components of interest:

Sites à fort potentiel de requalification / Sites with high redevelopment potential

LÉGEND / LEGEND

MAR

IA

MÉTRO

BIBLIOTHÈQUEÉGLISE SAINTE-FRANÇOISE-CABRINI

GARE

P

250 m100 m

Close to Labelle Boulevard, residents would like to see the development of multi-family dwellings for diverse populations. A vertical mix is also desired, with a commercial ground floor and residential use on the upper storeys.

Labelle Boulevard

Location of the various intervention sites around Labelle BoulevardSource : Google Maps, 2020


Workshop 3 dealt with the redevelopment of Boulevard Labelle, Place Rosemère and the former golf course and was introduced by explaining the Town’s main orientations for these three sectors. This workshop aimed at validating the Town’s vision for these sites and at determining the preferred form of development as well as the acceptable sizes and heights of buildings along Labelle Boulevard, Place Rosemère and the former golf course. As part of this, the workshop addressed the maximum height for each of the sectors, the mix of uses, the types of clienteles targeted by new developments, the redevelopments of the Galerie des Mille-Îles and Quatre coins sites and the priorities and scope of the development of the sectors.

FORMS OF DEVELOPMENT

What form of development should be favoured on these three sites?

Four sites are suitable for large-scale redevelopment in Rosemère: Labelle Boulevard, Place Rosemère, the site of the former golf course, and the sites of Galerie des Mille-Îles and Quatre coins. The participants expressed their concerns, wishes and conditions for success for each of these sites.

Only one group expressed a concern about Place Rosemère in its current form: the site is vastly built up with asphalt and concrete, making it a heat island.

The wishes for Place Rosemère were as follows: roof greening, following the example of Lufa Farms in Montreal, thereby creating a new green space that would complement the desired overall greening of the terrain; densification of the site near the highway; and the installation of a public facility such as a municipal swimming pool and a senior citizens’ building.

Measures to reduce noise pollution coming from the highway was mentioned as a condition for success for any of these wishes.

Labelle Boulevard, seen from the northSource : Google Maps, 2020


Place Rosemère

Participants expressed some concerns about the development of the site of the former Rosemère golf course. First of all, it should be noted that the site’s strategic location flanking highways represents a strong potential for densification. However, residents are disturbed about the lack of transparency regarding the information communicated to them. There are also concerns about the correlation between nature conservation and the rise in altitude. The possibility of converting the former golf course into a park was met with reservation by some residents, who

The former golf course


are concerned about the community’s ability to acquire the site to transform it into a park (increase in taxes) and who pointed to the potential loss (in property taxes) if it were to be requalified as a park rather than hosting real estate development.

Residents had many wishes, often divergent, with regard to a number of aspects of the site’s redevelopment. These can be summarized as follows:

• Redeveloping the site as a “domain” that would preserve the wooded area (25% of the land) while allowing for single-family residences with their own entrance path;

• The planning and development of a network of pathways, bicycle paths and walking trails, integrated with site’s densification according to the principle of density gradation (from Labelle Boulevard to the interior of the site);

• The planning of a mixed (residential and commercial) and intergenerational development offering a diversity of housing types for different clienteles, providing for services such as daycare centres and the integration of the elderly as opposed to their typical spatial isolation;

• The integration of nature into the design of buildings, by taking inspiration from Scandinavian examples or by putting out a call for an architectural competition;

• The conservation of the site as a large green space (with a minimum proportion of the land to be conserved) with parks accessible to the public, including activities for contemplating the flora and fauna;

• The inclusion of community gardens;

• The inclusion of affordable or social housing to improve housing accessibility at this location;

• Compliance with ecological performance standards for proposed buildings;

• Underground parking;

• Exploiting the scale of the site to create a multipurpose park (contemplative and sports) designed from a comprehensive perspective with a network of trails for various activities (skiing, running, walking), a body of water and flowered and planted areas (rather than focusing on small parks according to sector).

• The development of condominium buildings for the elderly integrated into the natural environment;

• The recommended development of low-rise townhouses (2 to 3 storeys);

• Low-intensity development to preserve as much green space as possible;

Site de l'ancien golf (suite)

Aerial view of the former golf courseSource : Google Maps, 2020


• The requalification of the site as a park that would be privately owned and managed by the owner;

• Conservation of the site as is, with the exception of the requalification for real estate development purposes of the portion flanking Labelle Boulevard;

• The acquisition of the site by the Town of Rosemère.

The participants stipulated the following four conditions for the implementation of these measures: One, the conservation of existing wetlands and green spaces is paramount. Second, an assessment must be carried out of the development’s impact on the road network, to avoid congestion of the nearby road network. Three, any parking areas must be underground. And four, particular attention must be paid to the quality of construction, appearance and integration of the social housing building, to contribute to its longevity and to prevent it from resembling the stereotypical, less attractive social housing.

Regarding the future of the Galerie des Mille-Îles and the Quatre Coins sites, residents are concerned about the height of the building stock. According to them, it is not desirable to allow buildings of up to 5 or 6 storeys, pointing to the negative example of Complexe Desjardins in Blainville. There is also a risk of diminishing Rosemère’s cachet. Finally, the frequency of the public transit service serving this sector is deemed to be deficient.

A number of residents have expressed their wishes regarding the future of these sites. Some find that commercial development should take place on small lots, and in a uniform manner, in keeping with what already exists on Labelle Boulevard. They also wish to see the development of a vertical mix of uses, with 4 storeys considered the maximum height, although one resident would tolerate a maximum of 6 storeys. Parking lots are to be put underground, although parking in the back of houses can be tolerated for lower buildings (2 to 3 storeys). Further, residents want a residential development that integrates into the natural environment in an organic manner and that favours spacing between buildings. Finally, still other residents expressed the wish for the development of a building for the elderly or semi-retired, integrating greenery.

Galerie des Mille-Îles and Quatre Coins sites


ACCEPTABLE SIZES AND HEIGHTS

What would be acceptable sizes and heights for buildings along Labelle

Boulevard, Place Rosemère and on the golf course?

The participants expressed their concerns, wishes and conditions for success for three different sites with respect to acceptable sizes and heights for the areas flanking Labelle Boulevard, Place Rosemère and the former golf course.

Labelle Boulevard With regard to Labelle Boulevard, in the context of the potential redevelopment, residents are concerned about the proximity of Autoroute 640 and the associated road traffic nuisance (dust, noise, vibration, etc.), which would diminish the quality of life.

The wishes expressed by the participants concern mainly the maximum height, which they set at 4 storeys on average, with some people preferring to cap the height at 5 storeys and others still at 3. They also want the integration of a commercial ground floor and residential upper storeys. As for the part of the Boulevard flanking the former golf course (east of Labelle Boulevard), most residents likewise favoured a maximum of 4 storeys, with some residents allowing for a maximum of 6 or 8 storeys and others setting the limit at 2 storeys.

Place Rosemère According to the residents, Place Rosemère seems to be the space most conducive to density integration. Many residents would like a maximum height of 6 or 8 storeys, or even up to 10 storeys. All of them attach particular importance to architectural integration with the existing built environment. Here, too, vertical mixing, with commercial uses on the ground floor and residential uses on the upper storeys, is to be favoured, as well as a senior citizens’ residence with adapted shops and services on the ground floor.

Former golf course The redevelopment of the site of the former golf course gave rise to a lot of exchange between residents. The main concerns are related to the conservation of the characteristic atmosphere of Rosemère. The residents also complained about the lack of information on the development of the site, which makes it difficult for them to decide on a desired maximum number of storeys. They are also concerned about the proximity of Autoroute 640, which would be harmful and incompatible with a residence for the elderly. The last main concern expressed by residents is the congestion that would result from the development of the site.

Most participants would like buildings on the site of the former golf course to have a maximum of 4 storeys, with some residents preferring 3 storeys and others 5 storeys. For buildings along Labelle Boulevard, residents veered toward a maximum height of 6 or 8 storeys, while still paying attention to landscaping, integration and insisting on underground parking lots.


AFFORDABLE OR SOCIAL HOUSING

Who should be the target clientele for new developments? Should there

be affordable or social housing in Rosemère?

The participants were then asked to reflect together on the types of housing and clientele targeted by the new developments, and especially whether these should offer affordable or social housing.

The main concerns expressed by the participants relate to:

• Affordability of housing in this part of Rosemère, especially for young families;

• The risk of resembling neighbouring towns whose buildings are higher and who lack their own identity;

• Increased traffic congestion due to multi-family housing development (8 condominiums per building);

• The saturation of the territory of Town of Rosemère, where vacant land is scarce;

• The reduction in value of existing neighbouring properties. One resident felt that the construction of townhouses tends to reduce the value of the sector.

The participants then expressed clear wishes, including encouraging intergenerational mixing and the integration of social and accessible housing. As a condition for success, they identified the architectural appearance and quality of low-cost buildings, emphasizing that these should likewise be attractive, solid and durable.

Concerning the overall perspective of the Labelle Boulevard sector and the site of the former golf course, residents expressed the following wishes:

• Allowing for a building height sufficiently high to render underground parking profitable;

• High-rise construction is to be favoured on the outskirts of Rosemère, near the Canadian Tire, where it may reach a height of up to 7 storeys;

• The distinctive face of Rosemère’s town entrance should not be marked by a shopping centre or condominium towers;

• Planning for commercial use only on the west side of the Boulevard Labelle, relieving traffic congestion on the east side (residential).

Several conditions for success were also discussed. Success will depend primarily on achieving an integrated gradation of building heights, the highest of which should be on the west side of Labelle Boulevard. The east side, near the site of the former golf course, should have a lower maximum height.

Overall perspective


To conclude the workshops, participants were asked to reflect on the minimum proportion of green space to be retained on the site of the former golf course. A data analysis of the many responses showed that the majority of participants favoured retaining 50% of the former golf course as green space, with most others wishing to retain only 35% or 25%. Nevertheless, a number of participants are in favour retaining a share of more than 50% as green space, with figures of 60% or even 80% being put forward.

51-75%

50%

35%

34% ET -

76% ET +

MINIMUM PROPORTION OF GREEN SPACE TO BE

PRESERVED ON THE SITE OF THE FORMER GOLF COURSE

What proportion should the park in the golf course occupy in relation to the

development?

12%88%


2.2 RESULTS OF THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES

This section presents all the results of the public consultation activities held on February 19 and 22. It reports on the comments shared by the 192 participants at the roundtable workshops and those of the 175 participants at the pop-up kiosks. Although the formula of these activities differed, they elicited similar comments, notwithstanding the fact that some proposed solutions were dealt with only in one activity and not the other. In total, 43 proposed solutions were the subject of the activities. Of those, 31 were discussed at both the roundtables and the pop-up kiosks (8 dealing with the village hub and 23 with the regional hub), while all were discussed at the pop-up kiosks (meaning that the kiosks discussed 12 more solutions).

In the following, we present the main results of the public consultations on the basis of the:

• 8 proposed solutions for the village hub—results of the roundtables + pop-up kiosks;

• 23 proposed solutions for the regional hub—results of the roundtables + pop-up kiosks;

• 12 additional proposed solutions for the Town as a whole—results of the pop-up kiosks only.

For each proposed solution, a graph shows the proportion of people who voted for or against it. The portion in black refers to the percentage of people against the solution, while the grey portion represents the percentage in favour. It is important to mention that the majority of the people who were in favour of a solution also supported the specific conditions, which are detailed in the accompanying text.

OVERALL RESULTS

The analysis of all the results, for all proposed solutions, reveals that 88% of the participants mostly supported them while 12% did not. Some solutions were unanimously supported, while others received mixed results. These results are detailed in the following paragraphs.

11%89%

8%92%


This first proposed solution invited residents to consider the creation of a multi-use path on Grande-Côte Road. The majority of residents are in favour of the creation of this multi-use path, while underscoring that it must be safe and sufficiently wide. The trees must also be preserved, as well as existing terraces. The need for partial expropriations (the front part of the lots only) do, however, raise concerns among some residents. According to the latter, it should also be possible to improve the road markings along the entire corridor, in order to keep Grande-Côte Road in its current state and to make bicycle travel safer, and this as quickly as possible (the other options being more medium-term).

The residents opposed to this proposal suggested reducing the speed limit for cars to 30 km/h and widening the sidewalks while retaining the width of the lanes reserved for cars. Some also want a unidirectional bicycle path separate from the sidewalk on each side, in order to separate modes of transport and limit the risk of pedestrians facing bicycles. Finally, according to some residents, road markings would be sufficient since Grande-Côte Road does not have the capacity to accommodate such a project (electricity poles, trees, current traffic, etc.)

Although a small proportion of residents would like to maintain the status quo with the existing situation and expressed concern about car traffic and the negative impact on businesses, a strong majority of participants support this measure.

Some participants would like to go even further by concentrating commercial activity between Rose-Alma and Corona or William streets. A diversity of shops is desirable (notably with the promotion of local production and neighbourhood shops such as bakeries, ice cream parlors, Multimags, etc.) while preserving the spirit of a village with a rural character that readily allows for people to exchange, local mobility and neighbourhood life. The stability of the sector is also at the heart of the concerns, since some participants noted a high turnover rate for certain commercial premises. This concentration must also be achieved through good architectural integration, better management of parking lots (both in terms of their location and number of spaces), improvements to certain infrastructures (sidewalks, lighting, etc.) and easy access for all modes of transportation, be it cars (by continuing to ensure the fluidity of traffic), cycling (by making travel safer) or any other mode of active transportation.

VILLAGE HUB OF ROSEMÈRE

1. Create a multi-use path on

one side of Grande-Côte Road,

to make cycling safer

2. Encourage the

concentration of local

commercial activities on

Grande-Côte Road between

Broadway and Remembrance

streets through various

means of revitalization

This solution aimed at preserving the maximum permitted density of 60 dwellings per hectare on Grande-Côte Road was unanimously supported by the residents, with one exception.

Residents would like to maintain the status quo regarding density yet also enhance diversity while limiting the maximum building height to 2 storeys, with one resident preferring a maximum height of 4 storeys (as set out in the MDP). Overall, the participants would like to limit the maximum heights in order to maintain a harmonious landscape and respect nearby residences.

3. Maintain the density

allowed on Grande-Côte Road

4. Preserve Rosemère’s

natural heritage south

of Grande-Côte Road by

restricting land use

The preservation of Rosemère’s natural heritage, across the Town’s entire territory, is a concern that is shared by all residents. Hence, the majority of residents support this proposed solution, provided it is applied across the entire territory and not only in the sector located south of Grande-Côte Road. Respect for architecture and green spaces throughout the Town is also an important aspect to consider. The conservation and enhancement of the canopy and views of river lies also at the heart of participants.

Furthermore, the notion of natural heritage should be broadened to include the built heritage. The establishment of a demolition committee as well as better supervision of house extensions and the imposition of restrictions on building heights and architectural disparities, as suggested by residents, are part of this desire to broaden the notion of heritage.

The protection of the riparian strip, with a widening of the latter to 15 metres, a better consideration of flood risks, and above all prevention of erosion of the land near the river also seems to be of concern to the residents. The preservation of wetlands, and this throughout the territory, was likewise prioritized. However, residents are not favourable to imposing too many restrictions, as this could hinder the attractiveness of the area.

1%99%

11%89%

Aerial view of Tylee MarshSource : Google Maps, 2020


5. Provide a framework

for the integration of new

constructions into the existing

natural environment

Reactions to this solution were more mixed. Acquiring the land on Grande-Côte Road between Maria and Adélard streets in order to create a public square was welcomed by residents as long as this acquisition is made at fair market value. In addition, a reduction in the maximum speed limit on Grande-Côte Road would increase the feeling of safety while improving the quality of life of neighbouring residences. To this end, many residents suggest the installation of a buffer zone between the future square and the residences directly adjacent to it. The design of that zone should integrate green and community spaces.

However, many residents are concerned that most of the space will be built up, to the detriment of the greenery, and will be too expensive for the community. In their opinion, the central location of this space would be better suited to the construction of a seniors’ residence, since these facilities are in high demand in Rosemère. Housing, particularly social housing, would also be possible in this location. Some participants appreciate the proximity of the land on Grande-Côte Road between Maria and Adélard streets, the only one of its kind in this sector. The decontamination of the site could ultimately lead to a considerable increase in the cost of developing this public space.

6. At a fair price, acquire the

land on Grande-Côte Road

between Maria and Adélard

streets in order to create

a lively, landscaped public

square in the heart of the

village hub

This solution is without a doubt the one that most closely reflects the values of the residents of Rosemère. More than anything else, they want to manage and respect the natural environment, in particular by reducing the number of exemptions granted. Many participants also suggested that development be guided by criteria set by residents.

In particular, residents consider it essential to focus on trees and their conservation. Architectural integration with the natural environment and the existing built environment is equally important. Finally, repetition of the same home models should be avoided, as this could represent, according to some residents, an architectural disaster.

0%100%

24%76%


The redevelopment of the site between William and Couture streets into a low- and medium-density residential complex was not unanimously supported, especially by the participants at the pop-up kiosks, who were more vehemently against this measure than the other participants. They took issue with the parking difficulties around the train station, especially for those using the commuter train to get to downtown Montreal, which is becoming increasingly popular. They therefore consider it to be more relevant to use this space for parking for the Rosemère train station.

However, several arguments were also put forth in favour of this idea. The site is indeed considered interesting because of its proximity to the station and is conducive to the application of TOD (transit-oriented development) principles. Its present function as a parking lot has lost its raison d’être in the eyes of many residents, and could at least be greened to reduce the impact on direct neighbours (heat islands, noise, rainwater retention, etc.) while becoming part of an intermodal network. The decontamination of the site is also very important in the eyes of residents.

In order to limit costs to the community, the participants would not like to see the Town acquire the land, and do not want it to resort to expropriation under any circumstances. A private owner-to-private owner transaction is therefore to be preferred.

Should this site be redeveloped, many residents recommend a maximum height of 2-, 3- or even 4-storey buildings so as not to interfere with neighbouring single-family residences. The conservation of a low or medium density is, according to them, essential to prevent an increase of traffic. The planting of trees is essential, regardless of the nature of the project.

7. Plan the redevelopment

of the site between William

and Couture streets into a

low- and medium-density

residential complex

9%91%

Aerial view of the site between William and Couture streetsSource : Google Maps, 2020


The notion of intermodality seems to be increasingly popular with the population, with more and more people aware of the concept. Thus, the vast majority of participants at the public consultation events were in favour of better intermodality in Rosemère, with the enhancement of the public transit supply around the commuter train station as a key component.

According to many residents, accessibility to the station should be made easier, in particular through shuttles that would allow serving a majority of residents, in turn reducing car dependency. Active travel, whether pedestrian or bicycle, should also be promoted in order to improve accessibility from neighbouring residential areas and beyond. The integration of self-service vehicles (Communauto) or self-service bicycles (Bixi) was also suggested on numerous occasions, as was the creation of a bicycle path on the railway bridge.

Many residents also say that there should be better Exo train service and local bus service at the station. They complained about the infrequent train service outside peak hours as well as the lack of synchronization between the schedules of the various service providers. An alternative was proposed by one participant: a shuttle between the village centre to the Montmorency (Laval) metro station.

Finally, the issue of incentive parking was raised many times. A number of residents were in favour of introducing a parking permit with variable rates according to where the vehicles come from, while also reserving spaces for electric vehicles (alongside new charging stations) or carpooling vehicles. Finally, they propose that any reduction in the number of parking spaces be linked to the increase in the number of shuttles serving the territory.

8. Prioritize better

intermodality in Rosemère,

particularly through improved

public transit service around

the commuter train station

2%98%

Exo commuter train station of RosemèreSource : Wikipedia, 2020



This initial proposed solution suggested implementing a specific approval process by residents and to subject all development projects for Place Rosemère to the criteria of the overall development plan (ODP). The participants, particularly those at the pop-up kiosks, were generally in favour of this proposal. Indeed, all residents wish to be consulted on any redevelopment project for Place Rosemère, since they consider their opinion to be of paramount importance. However, they considered other proposals to be just as adequate, namely the establishment of a referendum or a public consultation process. In addition, the entire Town should be able to participate in any activity, and not only the contiguous areas. The vote of the residents will finally have to be taken into account.

Residents also want a rigorous ODP to be put in place to avoid unpleasant surprises. The maximum height suggested by many residents is 4 and 6 storeys. They seem to support a denser redevelopment of Place Rosemère while specifying that the homogeneity of Rosemère must absolutely be preserved. Finally, any process will have to be carried out in close collaboration with Place Rosemère.

REGIONAL HUB OF ROSEMÈRE

1. Require that all

development projects meet

the criteria of the overall

development plan (ODP)

criteria and a specific

residents’ approval process

Place Rosemère

The residents consulted are generally in agreement with the proposal to create and optimize active and public transit links to Place Rosemère. A bicycle path crossing the golf course from east to west, as well as a viaduct to cross Labelle Boulevard in complete safety, were favoured by many participants. The current situation is considered highly problematic and unsafe for active modes of transportation. Access for pedestrians must absolutely be improved, and reflection on mobility must be considered on a town-wide scale and not just the Place Rosemère site. The proposal to increase the supply of public transit and to optimize it, particularly toward transportation nodes (stations, metro stations, etc.) is consistent with this.

However, a small proportion of residents does not consider this to be a priority, particularly because of the ageing population. Cycling in Rosemère is also considered dangerous. The proposed bicycle path on Labelle Boulevard seems sufficient to them.

2. Create and optimize active

and public transit links to

Place Rosemère

3%97%

5%95%

3. Create a public square on

the Place Rosemère site

Participants had very mixed reactions to this proposal, especially at the pop-up kiosks, where a strong majority of participants were against it.

Residents were generally in support of a medium density yet less so with a high density. The maximum number of storeys was set at 6 to 8 floors, although one resident proposed up to 9 storeys along Autoroute 640. In all cases, height gradation is important, as is the installation of a buffer strip protecting the existing built environment. The installation of green walls was also mentioned several times, as was the construction of noise barriers. The reduction of heat islands is also a major concern here, as is the need to green the area. Several residents suggested having underground parking lots, whereby the surface would be available for greening. Obtaining LEED certification for new constructions was also considered a guarantee of success. Finally, improvement of public transit service was likewise considered a priority, particularly in order to reduce congestion in the sector, which would be accentuated by the influx of new residents or workers on the site.

The residents against this proposal fear in particular the additional increase in car traffic in the sector. They were also less in favour of building residences along Autoroute 640, mainly because of the nuisances and possible impacts on the health of residents. Offices or institutions would, in their opinion, be more relevant. The maximum acceptable height was set at 2 storeys on the site, in order to preserve the rural character of Rosemère.

4. Plan a medium-density

residential zone on the

Place Rosemère site, along

Bouthillier Boulevard, and

a high-density zone along

Autoroute 640 and Labelle

Boulevard

Residents have a rather mixed opinion of the proposal to create a public square on the Place Rosemère site. Those in support of this proposal want a green square, as the site is currently considered too commercial and built-up. The addition of an indoor public space for events and activities in the case of inclement weather was also put forward. The addition of green roofs and garden terraces around the public square was also requested. The greening of the parking lot, the addition of solar panels on the roofs and charging stations for electric vehicles were also mentioned.

However, many residents are rather sceptical about this proposal, not seeing the usefulness or added value of such a space. Moreover, this place would serve the entire population of the North Shore and not only for Rosemerites. According to them, it is not suitable as a gathering place, particularly because of its proximity to the highway, and more appropriate for developing office buildings.

29%71%

32%68%


With the exception of one negative vote, this solution was unanimously approved by the participants at the two consultation events, once again confirming Rosemerites’ attachment to the quality and sustainability of their living environment.

Thus, the installation of green and white roofs was approved many times. Combined with the development of urban agriculture, particularly with rooftop greenhouses (such as at Lufa Farms) and the requirement for a certain density of trees on parking lots (large trees, shrubs, percentage of conifers), these measures would make it possible to continue the transition to a more ecological living environment.

Reducing the maximum number of parking spaces and eliminating the minimum number of spaces would also be a first step in this direction. The landfilling of parking lots is also requested, as well as encouraging eco-friendly construction and renovations.

According to several residents, the reduction of heat islands also involves reducing the use of concrete in all its forms (on buildings, parking lots, etc.). The installation of rain gardens and the use of water-permeable pavers was also suggested. On the whole, the residents affirm being in favour of greening measures.

5. Reduce heat islands

by increasing the canopy,

greening commercial

sectors and by encouraging

underground parking

0%100%

Aerial view of Lufa Farms, MontrealSource : Google Maps, 2020


11%89%


The proposal to promote the redevelopment of Labelle Boulevard and the user-friendliness of active transportation by locating businesses closer to the Boulevard has raised many questions. Even though most residents voted in favour of this proposal, the transcription of the explanations they provided allowed for a more differentiated understanding of their positions.

The residents are in favour of a redevelopment of Labelle Boulevard, but by planting trees rather than moving the commercial buildings closer. Planting trees would increase the presence of greenery, improve landscaping of sidewalks and bicycle paths, improve public transit service and allow for the creation of edible gardens and pedestrian paths. All of these aspects are considered more important in the eyes of residents than bringing buildings closer to the Boulevard.

In their opinion, emphasis should also be placed on reducing the visual impact of parking areas. An appropriate distance from existing single-family homes is also essential. Finally, according to the residents, any redevelopment should give priority to local businesses.

6. Promote a framework for

Labelle Boulevard and the

user-friendliness of active

transportation by locating

commercial establishments

closer to the Boulevard (avoid

the presence of parking lots

along the Boulevard

Boulevard Labelle

Residents were not unanimous with regard to the proposal to favour the commercial or mixed use on the west side of Labelle Boulevard and residential use on the east side, to avoid commercial saturation. On the one hand, many of them believe that the commercial use is currently well distributed on both sides of the Boulevard, that it is functional, and that it would be useless to add businesses near the golf course.

A few residents also seem concerned about the future of the former golf course site, and would like public consultations and a vote to be held in the event of a zoning change.

They generally agree with the integration of a mixed function west of the Boulevard, to complement the existing commercial function, but seem rather skeptical at the idea of having to choose between densification and preservation of the ecological richness of the golf course.

On the other hand, among those opposed to this solution, some residents find it more logical and fairer to distribute commercial and mixed uses on both sides of the Boulevard. Others question the need for additional development on the Town’s territory. Finally, the prospect of having more pedestrian crossings on Labelle Boulevard, caused by new construction, was a concern to many residents.

7. Promote commercial or

mixed uses on the west side of

the Boulevard and residential

use on the east side, to avoid

commercial saturation

23%77%

Heart of the sector Bois-Francs, MontrealSource : Lemay, 2019


The question of density seems to create a divide between residents. Some are for density and others against it, and there’s no in-between. In all cases, participants agreed on the need to integrate new developments, whether in terms of architecture, size or style. Harmony, without a doubt key to the success of any project, is achieved in particular through the gradation of heights, peaking at Labelle Boulevard north of Bouthillier Boulevard, while avoiding the impression of being walled in at all costs. The issue of affordability, but also accessibility, must be taken into consideration.

Participants capped the maximum height at between 4 and 6 storeys, and some propose that new constructions aim for LEED certification or propose green or white roofs to reinforce the fight against heat islands. Other residents suggest building modern townhouses, such as those found in Bois-Franc

8. Ensure a harmonious

integration of density

(medium or high) in the

redevelopment of the

regional hub, in particular

by promoting a moderate

gradation of densities

14%86%

4%96%

Development of Papineau Avenue, MontrealSource : Amine Esseghir, Journal Métro, 2016


Labelle Boulevard defines the territory of the Town of Rosemère and its future is very important to many residents. Its transformation into an urban boulevard is by and large welcomed by the participants. Although a small proportion of residents feel that the current situation is acceptable, many would like to see many changes made.

According to the residents, its redevelopment should first of all put the pedestrian back at the heart of the artery, by making the crossings safer and by reducing the maximum speed limit to 30 km/h. The new roadway should also be designed to make it easier for pedestrians to get to the middle of the street. The example of Papineau Street (Montreal) was cited several times for its quality of execution.

However, some residents are concerned about the costs associated with such a project, and would like the Ministère des transports du Québec, and not the Town of Rosemère, to foot the entire bill. They are also concerned about how such a project would fit into the existing built environment.

9. Transform Labelle

Boulevard into a true

urban boulevard with rain

gardens, vegetation and safe

pedestrian crossings

The proposal to build underground parking lots and the greening of existing parking lots was unanimously accepted by residents. They support this proposed solution provided that parking spaces are made available. However, they are concerned about the costs of implementation, in particular those incurred by developers. Finally, each excavation will have a non-negligible impact on the water table.

10. Encourage underground

parking and the greening of

existing parking lots

0%100%

Once again, residents insist on the importance of being consulted for any large-scale project carried out on the territory of the Town of Rosemère. Even if some find the consultation processes rather cumbersome, the vast majority recognize the importance of conducting such democratic processes. The fact that all major projects are subject to ODP criteria seems to meet the expectations of residents, as does the referendum process. In all cases, the participants affirmed that the entire Town must be consulted and not just the residents of the areas adjacent to the site in question. That said, respect for the vote and the opinion of residents will be equally important.

Finally, the residents would like to orient any future development of the site according to the principles of eco-neighbourhoods, in accordance with the responses to the other proposed solutions already mentioned. The development of a seniors’ residence was once again mentioned, recalling the great need for this type of facility in Rosemère.

11. Require that all

development projects meet

the criteria of the overall

development plan (ODP) and

a specific residents’ approval

process

Former golf course

The proposal to build a road for both motor vehicle and active modes of transportation traversing the former golf course was without a doubt the one that provoked the most opposing reactions. Many of the residents who recognize the importance of relieving congestion on Grande-Côte Road considered it to be important to facilitate active transportation, particularly bicycle, with the creation of a bicycle path. The quality of this new link should blend into the built environment, with the installation of a buffer zone, as well as with the surrounding road network and include the modernization of several intersections. Most residents would like to limit this new link to one lane per direction, or have one lane reserved for buses, taxis, carpooling and ecological vehicles.

Negative opinions about this proposal were varied and concern several themes. First of all, residents are concerned about a sudden increase in road traffic on the streets of neighbouring residential areas and the associated pollution. They also fear that this new link could become a new bottleneck to relieve congestion on Autoroute 640 and its service road, thus hindering local mobility. In their opinion, Grande-Côte Road is too far away for this new link to relieve congestion coming from that road. In addition, several expropriations would most likely be necessary, which residents don’t want.

However, many residents recognize that this is surely the only option to create an east-west link, notwithstanding many questions that remain unanswered in order to form a clear opinion on the subject. Finally, they agree that it is necessary to increase the supply of public transit rather than to encourage the use of cars.

12. Consider creating a

link accessible to both

motor vehicle and active

transportation from east to

west in the Bouthillier and

Roland-Durand corridor, in

order to relieve congestion on

Grande-Côte Road

2%98%

30%70%


13. Designate at least 50%

of the site of the former golf

course as park use and make

it accessible to all residents.

This will include spaces for

the conservation of natural

environments and buffer

zones with the current built

environment

A strong majority of residents say they are against this proposal aimed at providing a high-density residential area on the site of the former golf course, near Autoroute 640, and a medium-density area along Labelle Boulevard. The vast majority of residents favour medium density across the entire study area. The maximum desirable height is 4 to 6 storeys. The maximum height of 6 storeys would apply to the areas closer to Autoroute 640, in order to limit nuisances and act as a screen for the park, while the rest of the territory should not include buildings higher than 4 storeys. The topic of integration and architectural quality was considered equally crucial, with many residents promoting a mixed-use eco-neighbourhood type of development offering single-family and town houses and condominiums. Many participants fear a negative impact on road traffic.

The topic of senior citizens and the adaptation of the built environment to this segment of the population also remains at the heart of residents’ concerns, with several participants calling for the construction of seniors’ residences, as this is a pressing need.

14. Provide a high-density

residential area on the site of

the former golf course, near

Autoroute 640, and a medium-

density area along Labelle

Boulevard

26%74%

61%39%


It was rather difficult for residents to agree on a percentage, as the type of development is not yet defined. However, they do agree that the share reserved for the park should be more than 50%. Although a few residents believe that a 30% share would be sufficient, the vast majority of them would prefer a minimum of 50%, a minimum of 70% or even 100% for some. Finally, some mentions indicate that it is not the percentage of green spaces that matters most but the quality of the development, as well as the integration of green spaces and the respect of high environmental standards on the site. The high number of negative responses to this proposal can be explained by the high proportion of residents wishing to have the park on a higher portion of the site.

The residents also argue that this new park would compensate for the nuisances coming from Autoroute 640 (heat islands, pollution, noise). This new space would allow Rosemère to distinguish itself from neighbouring towns while being consistent with its new slogan of being “a proud, green and prosperous town.”

However, some residents are concerned about the cost of purchasing, developing and maintaining such a large park and the impact thereof on their taxes. They also mention the need to redevelop the golf course and meet the needs of the population, and to seek a balance in these needs. In order to reduce the tax impact of having a park in the golf course, some also proposed making access paid for by non-resident visitors to Rosemère, as is done at the Domaine vert in Mirabel. Finally, in order to preserve the site’s full green potential, they proposed moving residential developments toward Canadian Tire or Réno-Dépôt stores.

16. Protect wetlands and

tree species with high

biodiversity potential, and

provide sustainable rainwater

management on the site

The conservation of the natural topography of the site of the former Rosemère golf course is essential to any project in this sector, whether it is a real estate development or a park, and residents are nearly unanimous in this regard. The preservation of the canopy is to be included in this conservation effort. The possible contamination of the soil, due in particular to the products used for the maintenance of the golf course, seems to raise some concerns. That said, everyone agrees that the conservation of the contour lines is essential.

17. Preserve the natural

topography of the site

Housing affordability remains at the heart of the concerns of all Rosemère residents. Residents generally support the proposal of ensuring the presence of a diversity of housing, particularly affordable housing, in order to meet the needs of the entire population, whether young families or older households.

Any development should focus on an environmentally friendly form of housing, including green or white roofs, passive solar energy, tiny houses or car-free neighbourhoods. The sense of sharing also seems to be at the heart of the concerns, since many residents would like to see the development of an intergenerational and community-based housing supply.

Residents who opposed this proposal pointed to the lack of understanding of the notion of affordability, insofar as everyone has different means. Some residents are also against the construction of subsidized social housing, and reaffirm their desire to have quality housing, preferably in the form of town houses rather than condominiums.

15. Ensure diverse types of

housing, including affordable

housing

Residents unanimously supported this proposal, with only one person expressing their disapproval. The participants put forward many arguments and reaffirmed the motto of the Town of Rosemère.

Many residents felt assured that this proposal would comply with the provisions issued by the Ministry of the Environment, particularly concerning the protection of wetlands. The management of runoff water and the conservation of trees are hence fundamental elements to them, and they seek to ensure that special attention is paid to them.

Finally, some residents are concerned about wildlife, especially foxes, insofar as future work could disturb them if not destroy their natural habitat.

25%75%

0%100%

2%98%


18. Create an ecological

corridor on the former golf

course in order to link the

natural areas together and

promote biodiversity

As residents are strongly attached to natural areas, the proposal to create an ecological corridor on the site received a high level of approval. Residents even wish to maximize the space given to the ecological corridor, by combining it with the large buffer strip behind Golfridge Street. The Town’s acquisition of as much of the site as possible is therefore strongly advocated.

Since quality of life is just as important as environmental protection, residents supported these proposals. Some residents wish to eventually widen this buffer strip and dislike the fact that it is less wide on the northern portion of the former golf course site. This buffer strip will have to include vegetation, in order to absorb and reduce nuisances as much as possible.

Residents are also concerned about the maximum height of future developments that do not include a buffer strip, particularly for the area around Labelle Boulevard. Some residents are also concerned about the cost of construction.

19. Create a green buffer

zone between the existing

residential areas and the

residential development of

the site

4%96%

0%100%

Marie-Victorin park, LongueuilSource : Le Courrier du Sud, 2019


20. Ensure the presence of

active links within the site,

minimizing their impact on

the soil in sensitive areas

(wetlands)

Active mobility is important, particularly in terms of its impact on the living environment. Residents are therefore unanimously in agreement with this proposal. Residents are very attached to the golf course and the cross-country ski trails currently offered. The permanent installation, managed by the Town, of trails for cross-country skiing, biking or walking is therefore an idea that brings residents together. Covering these trails with stone dust would help to integrate the park into the natural environment, while an increase in the number of access roads would bring the park as close as possible to the residents.

21. Position the site’s

residential development as an

eco-neighbourhood project,

with high environmental

standards and representing

Rosemerites’ values

Not one resident was opposed to this proposal, which was then unanimously approved, demonstrating once again Rosemerites’ attachment to the quality of their living environment and to sustainable development.

Several suggestions were put forward by the participants, including the desire to create an eco-responsible neighbourhood with LEED certification, with the installation of green and white roofs and community gardens. Passive-type buildings or the organization of architectural competitions were also requested.

Cooperative housing-type constructions were also favoured, in order to allow middle-class households to settle in this environment. Grey water and rainwater management, as well as the development of passive solar energy through the installation of photovoltaic panels or the construction of self-sufficient greenhouses were other details discussed by the participants.

0%100%

0%100%

Linear park Petit train du nord, LaurentidesSource : Jean-Pierre Lavoie, 2007


22. Privilege underground

parking on the site

The participants were unanimous in their support for the landfilling of parking lots, although some concerns were raised, particularly with regard to the cost of implementing such a measure.

This proposal is part of the fight against heat islands, while supporting the desire to create a car-free neighbourhood for the benefit of public transit. The additional cost of putting parking lots underground must therefore be compensated by improving the public transit offer, to incentivize residents to do without a second vehicle.

23. Reserve space for a new

secondary school that would

occupy 10% of the site’s

surface area (as stipulated in

Quebec’s new Bill 40)

This last solution proposed to residents offers mixed results. Although everyone recognizes the importance of having a school facility, some don’t consider the golf course to be an ideal site for it. According to them, a school should instead be located near Autoroute 640, because of the road traffic generated by its use (parents, buses, etc.).

Other residents, however, consider this to be a great opportunity to create a school with a campus including community gardens and shared spaces as well as athletic fields and an indoor municipal pool. Some residents also mentioned the need for a trade school (DEP) or vocational school. Others still suggest turning the private Externat Sacré-Cœur into a public school.

Many residents were opposed to this measure, considering it unnecessary to have a new school, especially since there are already several in the territory. The location of the school on the site of the old golf course was also seen as problematic, with other sites considered more suitable for a new school.

1%99%

42%58%

Technopôle Angus, MontréalSource : Faire Montréal, 2020


1. Allow for active

transportation along Labelle

Boulevard

3. Secure active travel under

the 640 overpass of the

extension of René-A.-Robert

Boulevard

With a view to improving the efficiency and safety of active transportation, residents are unanimous when it comes to ensuring safety beneath the 640 overpass in the extension of René-A.-Robert Boulevard. A properly marked pedestrian and bicycle path separate from the traffic lane must be provided. Indications on the ground as well as signs indicating the direction to follow or the presence of cyclists and pedestrians are also suggested by several participants

4. Promote active transportation

links (accessible to pedestrians

and cyclists) between the site

of the former golf course and

adjacent neighbourhoods (e.g.,

Olivier, Tallwood, Bourbonnière)

A good connection between the former golf course and the adjacent neighbourhoods, notably via Olivier, Tallwood, Elizabeth and Bourbonnière streets is essential. The development of a viable and sustainable neighbourhood involves reducing car dependency, and improving active links is part of this approach. All the residents consulted on this subject were in favour of this proposal.

0%100%

0%100%

0%100%


Although most of the proposed solutions were presented at all of the public consultation events, several of them were only presented at the pop-up kiosks on March 22, 2020, since they concerned the Town as a whole or sectors outside of the project’s main areas of focus (village and regional hubs). Divided according to four themes, the following sub-section presents the 12 proposed solutions that were discussed only at these kiosks. The numbering of these proposals corresponds to the presentation in the appendices.

The residents of Rosemère are committed to active transportation, particularly cycling. They are therefore unanimously in favour of the construction of a multi-use link in the form of an exclusive right-of-way bicycle path along the Labelle Boulevard artery. According to them, priority should be given to cyclists rather than motorists throughout the territory. A pedestrian and bicycle link should also make it possible to safely cross Autoroute 640 to reach Sainte-Thérèse. Further south, the Île Bélair sector must also be developed to allow efficient and safe travel.

Mobility

SOLUTIONS DISCUSSED ONLY AT THE POP-UP KIOSKS

0%100%

0%100%

0%100%

0%100%


1. 1.Limit the footprint of

buildings and encourage the

construction of 2-storey buildings

that optimize land use in the

sectors south of Grande-Côte

Road, in order to preserve the

neighbourhood’s natural heritage

Residents unanimously agree with the proposal to restrict the footprint of buildings and to favour the construction of 2-storey buildings. Optimizing land use in the sectors south of Grande-Côte Road in order to conserve the neighbourhood’s natural heritage is, in their opinion, of prime importance. Moreover, the notion of heritage should not be limited to the built environment south of Grande-Côte Road but to the entire territory. The density of housing seems to be a concern for some participants.

Heritage and greening

4. Promote sustainable

management of rainwater

by creating rain gardens or

landscaped valleys along arteries

Residents are unanimous in their support for sustainable rainwater management. The development of rain gardens or landscaped gullies along certain traffic routes seems to be important to them. In order to accompany this action, some parking lots should, according to them, be green in order to reduce urban heat islands.

6. Ensure the protection of

arboreal species with high

biodiversity potential

The protection and enhancement of the forest cover and natural spaces and environments are pillars of Rosemère’s quality of life. All residents are therefore in agreement with the solution aimed at ensuring the protection of arboreal species with high biodiversity potential. In their opinion, an important part of the former golf course should be dedicated to the preservation of native and local plant and insect species.

7. Ensure the preservation of

Hamilton House

The preservation and enhancement of the heritage site of Hamilton House along Grande-Côte Road is unanimously appreciated by the residents. The protection of this gem of Quebec architecture, with its vast park, is thus to be prioritized.

4%96%

19%81%


2. Avoid commercial saturation

by concentrating the shops and

services of the regional hub (Place

Rosemère, former golf course

and Labelle Boulevard) in existing

areas

The commercial offer present on the Rosemère territory is at the heart of many citizen concerns. The dynamism and longevity of the this offer are important to many people. The majority of residents therefore support the proposal to prevent commercial saturation by means of ensuring that shops and services of the regional hub remain concentrated in existing areas. Some residents are also considering the possibility of encouraging the installation of local shops that promote the local economy.

ECONOMY

1. Enable the redevelopment

of Rosemère’s regional hub by

integrating new medium- and

high-density residential uses as

well as public uses to create a

complete living environment

The redevelopment of the Rosemère regional hub by integrating medium- and high-density residential uses as well as public uses in order to create a living environment seems to have been supported by the large majority of residents. However, a few participants said they were against high density or buildings of more than 4 storeys, and would like to concentrate residential development around Place Rosemère rather than on the site of the former golf course. Respect of the land development ratio, here as anywhere in the Rosemère territory, is important.

Urban development

2. Allow a higher density in

Rosemère, in the regional hub

The majority of residents are against allowing a higher density in the regional hub of Rosemère. They prefer retaining a medium density, with buildings of 4 storeys and less, at most. The creation of a buffer strip along Autoroute 640 was also put forward, in order to protect the quality of life in existing or future residential areas.

79%21%

3. Promote the preservation

of density in existing

neighbourhoods

5. Ensure a diversity of housing

types in the Rosemère area, in

particular in the

regional hub, to meet the needs of

all (e.g., senior housing, affordable

housing, family housing

The presence of diverse types of housing in Rosemère must be ensured, particularly in regional hub. Housing adapted to all spheres of the population must be offered on the territory, including more affordable housing and housing for families. According to many residents, the residential supply must be adapted to the ageing of the population by offering residences for the elderly.

29%71%


The quality of life in Rosemère is very important in the eyes of the residents and is to be highlighted in the development process of any project. The current situation, with low residential density in areas occupied by single-family homes, must be maintained according to the majority of residents.

Urban development (contd.)

5%95%

CREATION OF A MULTI-USE PATH

CONCENTRATION OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES

PUBLIC SQUARE

REDEVELOPMENT OF THE BUS LOT


2.3 RESULTS OF THE MEETING WITH THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY

The workshop with the business community brought together nearly 24 participants using the same formula and the same consultation forms as those of the evening of February 19, 2020. At the information session, the various issues identified in the territorial profile by Provencher_Roy were explained to the business people, who were then given the opportunity to express themselves about the proposed solutions for the project’s two main areas of focus.

The first special planning area, located along Grande-Côte Road, aims to strengthen the attractiveness of the village hub. In order to improve the sector’s accessibility, business people generally support the creation of a multi-use path along Grande-Côte Road, provided that it is well separated from the roadway, in order to improve the safety of the pedestrian and bicycle path. A concrete strip would be appropriate in their opinion. In addition, there are presently numerous roadway entrances along the route, and these have an impact on the height and slope of the route. The multi-use path should instead have a flat layout.

The business community had a more mixed opinion with regard to the concentration of commercial activities between Broadway and Remembrance streets. There are currently many offices or professional services outside this street segment, which do not attract the same clientele at the same times. Medical or professional services have longer visiting times than convenience stores, resulting in less car traffic to and from them. Indeed, this makes it more compatible with the more sophisticated social fabric of the residential area. Business people therefore support the idea of concentrating commercial activities in the village core while allowing various services outside this street segment (offices, medical services, etc.).

The development of a public square is not desirable for the business community, which instead points to other public spaces nearby that are suitable for this type of development. They prefer using the machine shop for a residential development or a 2- to 3-storey seniors’ residence with a commercial ground floor, which would enhance the commercial offer while creating a new core area within the sector. A public space could then be developed in front of the church or the library parking lot, to compensate for the proposed public square.

Finally, the redevelopment of the bus lot, near the train station, is the ideal site, according to them, for a new, higher-density residential development. Although this site could increase the number of parking spaces available around the train station, they consider the construction of a 3-storey residential building with underground parking to be more appropriate. However, the issue of affordability and the need for residences adapted to people aged 60 and over should not be overlooked.

Village hub


OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

PUBLIC SQUARE

RESIDENTIAL DENSITY

The project’s second main area of focus, the regional hub, has generated a lot of reactions and exchanges among business people. Although their interests tend to differ from those of residents, all participants, the business community and residents alike, recognize the importance of preserving Rosemère’s cachet while supporting the need to keep the area attractive and modern. Everyone agrees on the potential of the sites of the former golf course and Place Rosemère.

There was no unanimity among the participants about making any redevelopment project subject to a overall development plan (ODP), and some felt that this was not necessarily the most relevant solution, be it on the Place Rosemère site or on the former golf course. A ODP is, indeed, a rather long and constraining process that can easily slow down investments. Some participants suggested that the area should instead be subject to a by-law on site planning and architectural integration plans, which would call for a development plan. Business people are also in favour of consulting the population, namely as a way to ensure a type of development that better meets the needs of the population.

The development of a public square on the Place Rosemère site received rather mixed reviews. Some believe that this square would create a new gathering and entertainment hub for Rosemère while providing residents with a new area for rest and relaxation. However, this place is inseparable from the desire to create a living environment on the site, even if some participants do not consider it indispensable. Other participants felt that it would be more appropriate to create a second public square on the east side of Labelle Boulevard, where it would be in the heart of the new residential development and alongside the future park on the former golf course.

The issue of residential density is without a doubt the proposal that has provoked the most reactions from the business community. Everyone recognizes the importance of creating denser living environments, particularly around the TOD areas. To this end, many felt that the Rosemère train station should be moved near the regional hub, in order to create a denser TOD area and allow residents to travel easily to Montreal by train.

They also believe that the medium density should allow for a height of up to 6 storeys, while recalling the importance of height gradation and integration into the existing built environment. The high density should allow a maximum of 12 or 15 stories, if not more, in order to render it profitable to put parking lots underground. The construction of underground parking lots is very expensive, such that the higher the building, the faster one reaches the break-even point.

GRADATION OF HEIGHTS

Regional hub


The reduction of heat islands, through green roofs or green parking lots, has been addressed several times, as has the installation of urban agriculture on the roofs of new real estate developments.

The idea to develop Labelle Boulevard by bringing the built environment closer to the road and arranging for behind-building parking lots was not necessarily met with approval by the participants. They estimated that this would create a more cramped, less spacious ambiance which, together with the lack of visibility of the parking lot, would reduce customer traffic. A few participants cited the example of a grocery store, fairly close to the sector, which experienced a large drop in customers and had to close for that reason. The participants were more in favour of greening the sector by installing green spaces and planting trees, keeping in mind that, given its vocation as a major artery on the North Shore, Labelle Boulevard would never become a true urban boulevard. Some people are also against concentrating commercial uses west of the Boulevard, envisaging instead a concentration of big-box stores west of the Boulevard and local businesses east of it, to serve the new residential development and the second public square. This new sector, with its residential and commercial developments, would make it possible to better balance the offer on the territory while easing the pressure on the older sectors, such as residential or commercial real estate. However, other participants mentioned the importance of not creating businesses that would compete with the Place Rosemère offer so as not to weaken the existing commercial structure.

Finally, participants were generally in favour of extending Bouthillier Boulevard toward Roland-Durand Boulevard. This new axis would facilitate travel while providing a more direct link for active modes of transportation. On the other hand, some participants pointed to the difficulty of developing an integrated project in the golf course with the presence of such a link. Some mentioned the need to move the station to the intersection of this new boulevard in order to create a new TOD area, or at least to strengthen public transit service.

Participants also supported the construction of affordable housing, both for young families and seniors, in the form of housing coops and eco-neighbourhoods.

REDUCTION OF HEAT ISLANDS

DEVELOPMENT OF LABELLE BOULEVARD

URBAN BOULEVARD

EXTENSION OF BOUTHILLIER BOULEVARD

AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL

CONCENTRATION OF THE COMMERCIAL OFFER


This section presents the main additional points to be considered in light of the submission of a report analyzing the proposed solutions by the golf course developer. This document was produced by Vivre en ville with a view to positioning the golf course project as an eco-neighbourhood in compliance with municipal guidelines. While in alignment with most solutions proposed by the Town, the report had reservations about the following solutions:

Solution 13. Designate at least 50% of the site of the former golf course as park use and make it accessible to all residents. This will include spaces for the conservation of natural environments and buffer zones with the current built environment.

The report is critical of the idea of a large central park rather than a network of parks insofar as this could limit the opportunities for consolidation of the site and its coherence and also compromise the flexibility of the urban grid, islands and pathways. Moreover, they found the green space ratios of other eco-neighbourhoods in Quebec to be more like 20% to 40%. They indicate that the more public infrastructures (streets, parks, etc.) a city has, the higher the costs for their acquisition, development and maintenance, and the more limited the potential for accommodating clienteles with needs. This should be considered insofar as these needs will be difficult to compensate for elsewhere in Rosemère.

Solution 14. Plan a high-density residential zone on the site of the former golf course, near Autoroute 640, and a medium-density zone along Labelle Boulevard.

This proposal, relatively common in urbanism, aims to create a noise barrier to protect part of the golf course from the nuisance generated by a constraint (highway). The report points out that this way of doing things would imply a greater presence of dwellings near the nuisances. It proposes to reduce the density at this location or to favour uses that could coexist with the nuisances, such as a dog park or a sports field.

Solution 18. Create an ecological corridor on the site in order to link the natural areas together and promote biodiversity on the site.

Without denying the importance of creating a green network in the golf course project, the report mentions that it would be advisable to identify the real need in relation to the creation of an ecological corridor. For example, will it be necessary to interconnect the existing ecosystems and, consequently, to create conditions favourable to the movement of certain species? To do so, it would first be necessary to identify the animal and plant species concerned by the corridor.

Additional mentions following the submission of a study by the real estate developer of the Rosemère golf course


Solution 19: Create a green buffer zone between the existing residential areas and the residential development of the site

The objective of creating a buffer strip between existing and future residential environments is justifiable for reasons of social acceptability and to protect the property value of the dwellings. However, the report states that this is not a key principle of eco-neighbourhood development, as the strategy is more about minimizing cohabitation in a neighbourhood. The report mentions that a buffer strip (approximately 10 metres) should be created with a view to managing interfaces to increase privacy, without avoiding cohabitation of residents

Additional lane

In order to achieve sustainable mobility objectives at Rosemère, the report notes that part of the golf course is located within a TOD area that has a minimum density prescribed in the MDP, and that this was not addressed in the proposals. It seems unavoidable that an eco-neighbourhood project would allow for an increase in the residential offer close to a public transit network. Therefore, efforts must be made to achieve improved accessibility from the golf course to public transit (shuttles, improved bus service, etc.).


PART 3HIGHLIGHTS

Highlights

1From the meetings with the various groups (residents and business community), several highlights emerged from the analysis of all the comments. These highlights were drawn from the recurring themes observed in the responses or during the discussions.

2

3

The conservation and development of the heritage of Rosemère are at the heart of the concerns expressed, especially for the village hub. The notion of heritage, according to several residents, should not, however, be limited to buildings and should extend to greenery, natural and marshy areas. The conservation of large plots of land by limiting the possibility of parcelling and the conservation and development of the canopy, both in public and private spaces, was also requested. The protection of the riparian strip sheltering exceptional fauna and flora must also be protected at all costs, particularly because of its role in limiting soil erosion.

The height of the buildings in Rosemère was a topic of discussion among the participants. Most residents advocate the status quo and the preservation of the maximum permitted 2-storey height in the heart of the village hub, in order to favour the integration of all new construction and to maintain the harmony of the sector in terms of volume, building footprint and choice of cladding materials. For the regional hub, especially with regard to density and height, residents had difficulty coming to a consensus on a maximum acceptable height, although many wished to cap the height at 4 to 6 storeys. However, all agree that the gradation of heights is an important element in ensuring architectural integration into the existing built environment. There was unanimous support for the concept of an eco-neighbourhood, with the aim of ensuring the sustainable development of sites.

Mobility in Rosemère has been the subject of many discussions, particularly concerning the Rosemère train station. Incentive parking, often saturated, reflects the lack of alternatives to car travel. The creation of an autonomous shuttle service, increasing the possibility of intermodality within the station and reducing car dependency, are at the heart of the concerns expressed by residents. Traffic congestion, particularly on Labelle Boulevard and Grande-Côte Road, is also a concern for many residents. The extension of the Bouthillier/Roland-Durand axis is not unanimously supported, with fears of increased traffic on residential streets. A compromise is proposed by reserving this new axis for active and public transport. The improvement of the cycling network, in particular by creating a multi-use path on Grande-Côte Road also appeals to residents.

4The creation of a public square in the heart of Place Rosemère was not met with unanimous approval among residents, who do not necessarily see the need for it. This space is too close to the highway to be pleasant, demonstrating once again the importance of greenery, calm and serenity for the residents of Rosemère.


5The strengthening of the village hub as a commercial sector was mentioned many times. Residents, like the business community, are generally in favour of concentrating commercial uses in the heart of the sector to avoid a diffuse commercial fabric, but they would like to distinguish between current commercial uses (convenience stores, local services, etc.) and commercial uses in the form of offices, which could extend along Grande-Côte Road, particularly because of the reduced number of car commuters. In order to facilitate the concentration of businesses in the heart of the sector, residents approve of the mixed-use built environment with the goal of having a commercial ground floor and a residential upper floor.

6

7

8

The subjection of any redevelopment project to the overall development plan, for the redevelopment of both Place Rosemère and the former golf course, was put forward several times by residents, the majority of whom expressed wanting to be consulted about the future of their town. They consider consultation processes for subjects of major importance as essential to citizen democracy.

Housing affordability for young families and the increased supply of seniors’ residences have been called for many times, indicating a significant gap here, particularly in view of the ageing population and the significant increase in housing costs.

The application of numerous sustainable development principles is at the heart of expectations for any redevelopment project within the regional hub, particularly because it is the area with the most heat islands. The intense greening of contaminated surfaces, plans to put many parking lots underground or the installation of green roofs, particularly during redevelopment work, are therefore recommended by all residents, once again demonstrating that Rosemère residents feel attached to the quality of the living environment.

9It was difficult for residents to agree on the size of the area to be designated to the park on the former golf course. Although 50% is deemed to be the minimum acceptable area to a majority, many residents would like to see this share increased significantly, in order to preserve this urban gem. Nonetheless, others would prefer seeing less than 50% of the area allocated to the park, mentioning that this is one of the last areas in the Town that can be developed and pointing to other pressing issues, such as housing.


APPENDIX A OVERALL PLANNING CONCEPT

Annexe A - Plan concept d'aménagement

MA

RA

IS TYLEE

BO

ISBR

IAN

D

LOR

RA

INE

BLA

INVILLE

CHARRON

RIVIÈRE

CHIENS

MILLE

LAVA

L

SAIN

TE-THÉR

ÈSE

PLA

CE R

OSEM

ÈRE

PO

LICE

DE LA

FOR

ÊT DU

GR

AN

D-C

OTEA

U

RÉSER

VE NA

TUR

ELLE

USIN

E DE

FILTRA

TION

DES M

ILLE-ILESG

ALER

IE

AUX

PA

RC

HA

MILTO

N

CEN

TRE

PA

RC

B

OU

RB

ON

NIÈR

E

ÉCO

LE VAL-

DES-O

RM

ES

Rue Remembrance

Rue BroadwayDE VILLE

HÔ

TEL

ELEMEN

TAR

Y

HIG

H SC

HO

OL

SCH

OO

L

SAC

RÉ-C

OEU

R

BO

ISBR

IAN

D

LOR

RA

INE

BLA

INVILLE

CHARRON

RIVIÈRE

LAVA

L

SAIN

TE-THÉR

ÈSE

AN

CIEN

GO

LF D

E RO

SEMÈR

E

ÎLE DU

CH

AR

ME

ÉCO

LE ALP

HA

HU

BER

T-MA

ISON

NEU

VEÉC

OLE

AR

ÉNA

McC

RA

IG

RO

SEMÈR

E

EXTERN

AT

L'ENC

LOS

CO

MM

UN

AU

TAIR

E

ÎLE NO

RM

AN

DÎLE B

ÉLAIR

MA

RA

IS DE L'ÎLE D

ES JUIFS

PA

RC

C

HA

RB

ON

NEA

U

MA

RA

IS M

ILLER

MA

RA

ISB

OU

THILLIER

BO

ISBR

IAN

D

LOR

RA

INE

BLA

INVILLE

CHARRON

RIVIÈR

E D

ES

ÎLES

LAVA

L

SAIN

TE-THÉR

ÈSE

VILLE D

E R

OS

EM

ÈR

E

CO

NC

EP

T D'O

RG

AN

ISA

TION

SP

ATIA

LE /

UR

BA

N D

EVE

LOP

ME

NT C

ON

CE

PT D

IAG

RA

M

LÉGEN

DE / LEG

END

Pôles d’activités / A

ctivity centers :

Pôle villageois / Village center

Axe villageois / Village axis

Mobilité et liens de connectivité /

Mobility and connection links :

Pôle - à définir /

Center - to be defined

Pôle régional m

ixte /M

ixed-use regional center

Axe régional mixte /

Mixed-use regional axis

Pôle récréatif régional /

Regional recreation hub

Aire TOD

- Gare de R

osemère /

TOD

area - Rosem

ère train station

Sources : C

MM

, G

ouvernement du Q

uébec,Ville de R

osemère.

Composantes d’intérêt /

Components of interest:

Piste cyclable existante / Existing bike path

Route verte

Lien actif à créer / New

active transportation link

Secteur patrimonial /

Historic center

Lien viaire à créer / New

roadway link



APPENDIX B CONSULTATION FORMS USED ON

FEBRUARY 19, 2020

Annexe B - Matériel de consultation utilisé le 19 février 2020

Pôle villageois de Rosemère / Village Hub

RU

E DE R

OSEM

ÈRE

RU

E CO

UTU

RE

RU

E REM

EMB

RAN

CE

RU

E CO

RO

NA

RU

E CED

AR

RU

E HECTO

R


RUE LABELLE

RU

E PH

ILIPP

E

RU

E TUR

CO

TTE

RU

E MAU

RICE

DRA

LÉDA

EU

R


RUE PERRAULT

RUE PINE

RU

E OVILA

UAE

NN

OB

RAH

C E

UR

RU

E SPR

ING

HILL

RU

E BR

OADW

AY








LÉGEND / LEGEND

MAR

IA

MÉTRO


GARE

P

1. Créer une piste multifonctionnelle d’un côté du chemin de la Grande-Côte afin de sécuriser les déplacements en vélo

Create a multi-functional path on one side of Grande-Côte Road in order to make cycling safer

2. Favoriser la concentration des activités commerciales de proximité sur le chemin de la Grande-Côte entre les rues Broadway et Remembrance par divers moyens de revitalisation

Promote the concentration of local commercial activities along Grande-Côte Road between Broadway and Remembrance streets through various means of revitalization

3. Conserver la densité permise sur le chemin de la Grande-Côte Maintain the density allowed on Grande-Côte Road

4. Assurer la préservation du patrimoine naturel de Rosemère au sud du chemin de la Grande-Côte en restreignant l’occupation du sol Preserve Rosemère’s natural heritage south of Grande-Côte Road by restricting land use

5. Encadrer l’intégration des nouvelles constructions au milieu naturel existant Provide a framework for the integration of new construction into the existing natural environment

6. Faire l’acquisition à juste prix du terrain sur le chemin de la Grande-Côte, entre les rues Maria et Adélard, afin de créer une place publique aménagée et animée, au coeur du pôle villageois At a fair price, acquire the land on Grande-Côte Road (between De l’Église and Adélard streets) in order to create a lively, landscaped public square in the heart of the village hub

7. Prévoir le redéveloppement du site entre les rues William et Couture en un ensemble résidentiel de faible et moyenne densité Plan the redevelopment of the site between William and Couture streets into a low - and medium-density residential complex

8. Privilégier une meilleure intermodalité à Rosemère grâce, notamment, à une offre de transport collectif bonifiée autour de la gare de train de banlieue

Prioritize better intermodality in Rosemère, particularly through improved public transit service around the commuter train station

PISTES DE SOLUTION / SOLUTIONS

SYNTHÈSE / SUMMARY

Bâtiments d’intérêt patrimonial à Rosemère: 69Properties of heritage interest in Rosemère

Indice de canopée de la ville de Rosemère: 41,4% Canopy index of the town of Rosemere

Nombre de voyages de train en période de pointe: 13Number of train trips during peak periods

Nombre de places de stationnement à la gare de Rosemère: 382Number of parking spaces at Rosemère station

Taux d’occupation du stationnement de la gare de Rosemère: 100% Occupancy rate of the Rosemère train station parking lot

Nombre approximatif d’usagers de transport en commun par jour: 1 096Approximate number of transit riders per day

Proportion d’usagers utilisant la gare, provenant de Rosemère: 61%Proportion of users using the station, originating from Rosemère

Rayon d’attractivité de la gare de Rosemère: 16 kmAttractiveness radius of the Rosemère railway station

Taux d’utilisation de l’automobile pour les déplacements courants: 80% Automobile usage rate for routine trips

Valeur approximative du terrain entre les rues Adélard et Maria: 950k $ (2018) Approximate purchase value of the site between Adélard and Maria

Êtes-vous en accord ou en désaccord avec les pistes de solution suivantes? Pourquoi? Y a-t-il des divergences à votre table? C’est normal! Vous pouvez passer au vote et indiquer combien de personnes sont en accord et combien sont en désaccord avec la proposition. Do you agree or disagree with the following solutions? Why or why not? Are there differences at your table? This is normal! You can take a vote and indicate how many people agree and disagree.

POURQUOI ? / WHY ?

CONCEPT D’AMÉNAGEMENT GÉNÉRAL OVERALL PLANNING CONCEPT

Nom du facilitateur/Facilitator’s name: Courriel/email: Numéro de table/Table number:

FAITS INTÉRESSANTS / INTERESTING FACTS

COMMENTAIRES / COMMENTS

–+

1. Veuillez indiquer si votre table de discussion est en majorité favorable ou non à l’ensemble des propositions du pôle villageois. Please indicate below whether or not your table is in favour of the majority of the proposed solutions for the village hub.

2. Veuillez identifier les principaux points de convergence et de divergence entre les participants au sujet des solutions proposées. Please identify the main points of convergence and divergence amongst the participants regarding the proposed solutions.

3. Que pensez-vous de la formule utilisée ce soir? What do you think of the consultation format used tonight?


Annexe B - Matériel de consultation utilisé le 19 février 2020

Pôle régional de Rosemère / Regional center

1. Assujettir tout projet de développement aux critères du plan d’aménagement d’ensemble (PAE) et à un processus d’approbation spécifique par les citoyens

Require that all development projects meet the criteria of the overall development plan (ODP) and a specifique residents’ approval process

2. Créer et optimiser des liens de transport actif et collectif vers la Place Rosemère Create and optimize active and public transit links to Place Rosemère

3. Aménager une place publique sur le site de la Place Rosemère Create a public plaza on the Place Rosemère site

4. Prévoir une zone de moyenne densité résidentielle sur le site de la Place Rosemère, en bordure du boulevard Bouthillier et de haute densité du côté de l’autoroute 640 et du boulevard Labelle

Plan a medium-density residential area on the Place Rosemère site, along Bouthillier Boulevard, as well as a high-density residential area along Autoroute 640 and Labelle Boulevard

5. Réduire les îlots de chaleur en augmentant la canopée, en végétalisant les secteurs commerciaux et en encourageant le stationnement souterrain

Reduce heat islands by increasing the canopy, greening commercial sectors and by encouraging underground parking

6. Favoriser l’encadrement du boulevard Labelle et la convivialité des déplacements actifs en localisant les commerces plus près du boulevard

Insure that the Boulevard Labelle is bordered with trees and buildings instead of parking lots and that it is user-friendly for all by promoting secure active transportation

7. Privilégier la fonction commerciale ou mixte du côté ouest du boulevard et résidentielle du côté est afin d’éviter la saturation commerciale

Promote commercial or mixed uses on the westside of the boulevard and a residential use on the east side to avoid commercial saturation

8. Assurer une intégration harmonieuse de la densité (moyenne ou haute) dans le redéveloppement du pôle régional, notamment en favorisant une gradation douce des densités

Ensure the harmonious integration of medium or high density in the redevelopment of the regional hub, particularly by encouraging a moderate increase in densities

9. Transformer le boulevard Labelle en véritable boulevard urbain avec la présence de jardins de pluie, de végétation et de traverses piétonnières sécuritaires

Transform Labelle Boulevard into a true urban boulevard with rain gardens, vegetation and safe pedestrian crossings.

10. Encourager le stationnement souterrain et la végétalisation des stationnements existants

Encourage underground parking and the greening of existing parking lots


Require that all development projects meet the criteria of the overall development plan (ODP)8 and a specific residents’ approval process

12. Envisager la création d’un lien accessible au transport véhiculaire et actif d’est en ouest dans l’axe Bouthillier/ Roland-Durand, afin de désengorger le chemin de la Grande-Côte

Consider creating a link accessible to motor vehicle and active transportation from east to west in the Bouthillier/Rolland-Durand corridor, in order to relieve congestion on Grande-Côte Road

13. Conférer une vocation « parc » à un minimum de 50 % du site de l’ancien Golf et le rendre accessible à tous les citoyens. Celui-ci comprendra des espaces de conservations des milieux naturels et des zones tampons avec le cadre bâti actuel

Designate at a minimum of 50% of the former site of the golf course as “park” use and make it accessible to all residents. This will include spaces for the conservation of natural environments as well as buffer zones with the existing built environment

14. Prévoir une zone de haute densité résidentielle sur le site de l’ancien Golf, près de l’autoroute 640 et de moyenne densité le long du boulevard Labelle

Provide for a high-density residential zone on the former site of the golf course, near Autoroute 640, as well as a medium-density zone along Labelle Boulevard

15. Assurer la présence d’une diversité de logements, notamment des logements abordables

Ensure the availability of a variety of housing options, including affordable housing

16. Assurer la protection des milieux humides et des espèces arboricoles à haut potentiel de biodiversité ainsi qu’une gestion durable des eaux de pluie sur le site

Protect wetlands and tree species with high biodiversity potential, and provide a sustainable stormwater management on the site

17. Conserver la topographie naturelle du site Preserve the natural topography of the site

18. Créer un corridor écologique sur le site afin de relier les espaces naturels entre eux et favoriser la biodiversité sur le site

Create an ecological corridor on the former golf site to link the natural areas together and to promote biodiversity

19. Créer une zone tampon verte entre les quartiers résidentiels existants et le développement résidentiel du site

Create a green buffer zone between the existing residential areas and the residential development of the site

20. Assurer la présence de liens actifs à l’intérieur du site de l’ancien Golf, en minimisant leur impact au sol dans les milieux sensibles (milieux humides)

Ensure the presence of active links within the site, minimizing their impact on the ground in sensitive areas (wetlands)

21. Positionner le développement résidentiel du site comme un projet d’écoquartier, ayant de hauts standards environnementaux et qui représente les valeurs des rosemèrois

Position the residential development of the site as an eco-neighbourhood project, with high environmental standards and representing Rosemerites’ values

22. Privilégier le stationnement souterrain sur le site Prioritize underground parking on the site

23. Planifier l’espace pour une nouvelle école secondaire qui occuperait 10% de la superficie du site (comme le stipule la nouvelle loi 40 du Gouvernement du Québec)

Planning space for a new high school which would occupy 10% of the surface of the site (as stipulated in the new Government of Quebec Act 40)

Parc - Ancien golf de RosemèrePark - Former golf of Rosemère

Pôle d’activité / Activity centers:

BOULEVARD BOUTHILIER

BO

ULEVAR

D LAB

ELLE

PLACE ROSEMÈRE

RU

E WESTG

ATE

RU

E GO

LFRID

GE

RU

E FLOR

IAN

MAIL

LIW

EU

R

BOULEVARD ROLAND DURAND

UAET

ÔC

UD

EU

R

RUE DE LA CLAIR

IÈERE

SECTEURS DE PLANIFICATION DÉTAILLÉE SCHÉMATISÉS / DETAILED PLANNING AREAS

PLAN 02 : ANCIEN GOLF ET PLACE ROSEMÈRE / FORMER GOLF AND PLACE ROSEMÈRE

LÉGENDE / LEGEND

Axe régional mixte / Mixed-use regional axis

Pôle régional mixte / Mixed-use regional center

Lien viaire à créer / New roadway connection Lien actif à créer / New active transportation link


Mobilité et liens de connectivité / Mobility and connection links:

Densité proposée / Proposed building density::

Composantes naturelles / Natural components:

Moyenne densité /Medium density(3-4 étages / floors)

Haute densité / High density+4 étages / floors)

Corridor écologique à créer /New ecological corridor

Milieu humide protégé /Protected wetland

Place publique / Public space

BAN

DE TAM

PO

NB

AND

E TAMP

ON

BANDE TAMPON

BAN

DE TAM

PON

Intersection sécurisée / Secured intersection

Stationnement étagé / Parkade


Superficie du site de l’ancien golf: 0,581km²Surface area of former golf siteDensité résidentielle moyenne: 4 log/ha.Average residential densityPourcentage du territoire de Rosemère qui est construit: 90%Percentage of Rosemère’s territory that is builtProportion de l’usage résidentiel sur le territoire: 53%Proportion of residential use on the territoryProportion de maisons unifamiliales isolées: 83%Proportion of single-family detached homesProportion de propriétaires d’un logement: 88%Proportion of home owners Proportion des revenus de taxation provenant des commerces: 47%Proportion of tax revenues from businessesProportion de travailleurs à domicile: 11%Proportion of homeworkersMoyenne d’âge de la population: 42 ansAverage age of populationNombre de nouvelles unités de logement pour 75 ans et + 780pouvant être absorbées par le marché actuel: Number of new housing units for 75 years and over that can be absorbed by the current market

Êtes-vous en accord ou en désaccord avec les pistes de solution suivantes? Pourquoi? Y a-t-il des divergences à votre table? C’est normal! Vous pouvez passer au vote et indiquer combien de personnes sont en accord et combien sont en désaccord avec la proposition.

Do you agree or disagree with the following solutions? Why or why not? Are there differences at your table? This is normal! You can take a vote and indicate how many people agree and disagree.

POURQUOI ? / WHY ?


SITE DE L’ANCIEN GOLF / FORMER GOLF SITE

BOULEVARD LABELLE

PLACE ROSEMÈRE



SYNTHÈSE / SUMMARY

Nom du facilitateur/Facilitator’s name: Courriel/email: Numéro de table/Table number:

–+

1. Veuillez indiquer si votre table de discussion est en majorité favorable ou non à l’ensemble des propositions du pôle régional. Please indicate below whether or not your table is in favour of the majority of the proposed solutions for the regional hub.

2. Veuillez identifier les principaux points de convergence et de divergence entre les participants au sujet des solutions proposées. Please identify the main points of convergence and divergence amongst the participants regarding the proposed solutions.

3. Que pensez-vous de la formule utilisée ce soir? What do you think of the consultation format used tonight?


Annexe B - Matériel de consultation utilisé le 19 février 2020 (enfants)

MA

RA

IS TYLEE

BO

ISBR

IAN

D

LOR

RA

INE

BLA

INVILLE

CHARRON

RIVIÈRE

CHIENS

MILLE

LAVA

L

SAIN

TE-THÉR

ÈSE

PLA

CE R

OSEM

ÈRE

PO

LICE

DE LA

FOR

ÊT DU

GR

AN

D-C

OTEA

U

RÉSER

VE NA

TUR

ELLE

USIN

E DE

FILTRA

TION

DES M

ILLE-ILESG

ALER

IE

AUX

PA

RC

HA

MILTO

N

CEN

TRE

PA

RC

B

OU

RB

ON

NIÈR

E

ÉCO

LE VAL-

DES-O

RM

ES

Rue Remembrance

Rue BroadwayDE VILLE

HÔ

TEL

ELEMEN

TAR

Y

HIG

H SC

HO

OL

SCH

OO

L

SAC

RÉ-C

OEU

R

BO

ISBR

IAN

D

LOR

RA

INE

BLA

INVILLE

CHARRON

RIVIÈRE

LAVA

L

SAIN

TE-THÉR

ÈSE

AN

CIEN

GO

LF D

E RO

SEMÈR

E

ÎLE DU

CH

AR

ME

ÉCO

LE ALP

HA

HU

BER

T-MA

ISON

NEU

VEÉC

OLE

AR

ÉNA

McC

RA

IG

RO

SEMÈR

E

EXTERN

AT

L'ENC

LOS

CO

MM

UN

AU

TAIR

E

ÎLE NO

RM

AN

DÎLE B

ÉLAIR

MA

RA

IS DE L'ÎLE D

ES JUIFS

PA

RC

C

HA

RB

ON

NEA

U

MA

RA

IS M

ILLER

MA

RA

ISB

OU

THILLIER

BO

ISBR

IAN

D

LOR

RA

INE

BLA

INVILLE

CHARRON

RIVIÈR

E D

ES

ÎLES

LAVA

L

SAIN

TE-THÉR

ÈSE

VILLE D

E R

OS

EM

ÈR

E

CA

RTE

À C

OLO

RIE

R /

CO

LOU

RIN

G M

AP

LÉGEN

DE / LEG

END

Arena

Piscine / Sw

imm

ing Pool

École / School

Gare / Station

Parc / P

ark

Sources : C

MM

, G

ouvernement du Q

uébec,Ville de R

osemère.

Espace comm

ercial / Com

mercial zone

Ancien Golf / Form

er Golf



APPENDIX C CONSULTATION FORMS USED ON

FEBRUARY 22, 2020

w

MARÉCAGE TYLEE

CLUB DE CURLING

CENTRE

ÉCOLE VAL-DES-ORMES

HUBERT-MAISONNEUVE

POSTE DE

USINE DEFILTRATION

ACADÉMIESAINTE-THÉRÈSE

ELEMENTARY

HIGH SCHOOL

SCHOOL

SACRÉ-COEUR

BOISBRIAND

LORRAINE

BLAINVILLE

CH

AR

RO

N

RIVIÈRE

CHIENS

LAVAL

SAINTE-THÉRÈSE

PLACE ROSEMÈRE

ÎLE DUCHARME

ÎLE GAUDETTE

ÎLE AUX FRAISES

ÎLE PARÉ

LEBOUTHILLIER

CANADIAN TIRE

MANOIR BLEURY

ÉCOLE ALPHA

ÉCOLE

ARÉNA

POLICE

POMPIER

McCRAIG

ROSEMÈRE

EXTERNAT

L'ENCLOS

COMMUNAUTAIRE

DE LA FORÊT DUGRAND-COTEAU

RÉSERVE NATURELLE

CHSLD

ÎLE PHILIPPE-LABELLE

ÎLE NORMANDÎLE BÉLAIR

USINE DEFILTRATION

MARAIS DE L'ÎLE DES JUIFS

DES MILLE-ILESGALERIE

MARAISBOUTHILLIER

AUX

PARC HAMILTON

MARÉCAGE TYLEE

CLUB DE CURLING

CENTRE

PARC BOURBONNIÈRE


HUBERT-MAISONNEUVE

DE VILLE

POSTE DE

USINE DEFILTRATION

ELEMENTARY

HIGH SCHOOL

SCHOOL

SACRÉ-COEUR

BOISBRIAND

LORRAINE

BLAINVILLE

CH

AR

RO

N

RIVIÈRE

MILLE

DES

LAVAL

SAINTE-THÉRÈSE

GOLF DE ROSEMÈRE

ÎLE DUCHARME

ÎLE GAUDETTE

ÎLE AUX FRAISES

ÎLE PARÉ

ÉCOLE ALPHA

ÉCOLE

ARÉNA

POLICE

POMPIER

McCRAIG

ROSEMÈRE

EXTERNAT

L'ENCLOS

COMMUNAUTAIRE

MARÉCAGE

CHSLD



USINE DEFILTRATION


HOTEL

GLENDALE

MARAISBOUTHILLIER


BOISBRIAND

LORRAINE

BLAINVILLE

CH

AR

RO

N

RIVIÈRE

ÎLES

LAVAL

SAINTE-THÉRÈSE

PLAN 01 : MOBILITÉ / MOBILITYLÉGENDE / LEGEND

Réseau routier / Road network :

Réseau ferroviaire / Railway network : Transport actif / active transportation:

Réseau supérieur / Highways

Artère / Main streets

Nouveaux liens de connectivité / New mobility and connection links:

Gare de Rosemère / Rosemère Station

Ligne Exo 1 Saint Jérôme - Montréal

Pistes cyclables et chaussées désignéesExisting bike path and designated roadways

Route verte

Échangeur / Interchange

Réseau local / Local street network Passage à niveau / Railway crossing

Lien viaire à créer / New roadway link

Lien actif à créer / New active transportation link

Pôle intermodal / Intermodal hub

Aire TOD

VILLE DE ROSEMÈRE

CONCEPT D'ORGANISATION SPATIALE / URBAN DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT DIAGRAM

CONTEXTE / CONTEXT

ENJEUX/ ISSUES

ORIENTATIONS

OBJECTIFS / OBJECTIVES

Le citoyen effectue une multitude de déplacements au quotidien, que ce soit pour se rendre au travail ou à l’école, pour faire des achats ou pour s’adonner à ses loisirs. Ces déplacements peuvent se réaliser en voiture, en transport collectif ou en transport actif (à pied ou à vélo, entre autres). L’accessibilité aux lieux de destination et les conditions de déplacements (sécurité, confort, efficacité, etc.) sont des éléments intimement liés à la planification urbaine. L’adoption d’une approche globale de la mobilité durable vise à tendre vers des déplacements plus écologiques, équitables, sains et viables.

En matière de mobilité, la Ville de Rosemère vise à développer un

• Réseau de transport collectif saturé ;• Desserte du pôle régional en transport collectif et actif ;• Dépendance à l’automobile ;• Infrastructures piétonnes et cyclables peu développées ;• Achalandage sur certains axes principaux (dont Grande-Côte).

• Public transportation network saturated• Dessert of the regional pole in collective and active transport• Automobile dependency• Poor development of pedestrian and cycling infrastructure• Traffic on certain main routes (including Grande-Côte)

FAITS INTÉRESSANTS / INTERESTING FACTSRÉSEAU ROUTIER / ROAD NETWORK• Le territoire de Rosemère comprend de nombreux axes routiers importants mais

offre peu d’options pour traverser la ville d’est en ouest. On y retrouve d’ailleurs, des problèmes de congestions sur le boulevard Curé- Labelle, dans les bretelles de l’échangeur A-640/boul. René-A.-Robert et sur le chemin de la Grande-Côte.

• The territory of Rosemère includes many major roads but offers few options for crossing the town from east to west. There are congestion problems on Curé-Labelle Boulevard, on the A-640/Boul. René-A.-Robert and on chemin de la Grande-Côte.

TRANSPORT EN COMMUN / PUBLIC TRANSIT• En semaine, on compte 13 voyages de train en période de pointe ; • 69% des usagers se rendent à la gare de Rosemère en automobile, 19% en

transport actif et près de 11 % en transport en commun ;• Le stationnement incitatif de la gare de Rosemère compte un taux

d’occupation de 100% ;• 61% des usagers de la gare de Rosemère proviennent de la même ville.

• On weekdays, there are 13 train journeys during peak periods • 69% of users travel to Rosemère station by car, 19% by active transportation and nearly 11%

by public transit• The incentive parking at Rosemère station has an occupancy rate of 100%• 61% of users of the Rosemère station come from the same city

• Améliorer la mobilité durable de Rosemère en privilégiant le transport actif et collectif.

• Improve Rosemère’s sustainable mobility by promoting active and public transportation.

• Repenser le réseau routier afin de voir comment améliorer la fluidité du réseau ;

• Développer un réseau de transport actif et collectif intégré et sécuritaire sur l’ensemble du territoire ;

• Favoriser l’adoption de modes de vie axés sur la mobilité active.

• To rethink the road network in order to improve its flow• To promote the adoption of lifestyles based on active mobility• To develop a well-integrated and safe active and public transportation network

throughout the territory

TRANSPORT ACTIF / ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION• Peu de trottoirs sont aménagés dans la ville et l’indice de «marchabilité»

(Walkscore) est relativement faible ;• Aucune service d’autopartage ou de vélo-partage n’existe à Rosemère ;• 80,3 % des personnes qui résident à Rosemère se déplacent en

automobile pour se rendre à leur travail ;• 2,9 % des Rosemèrois se déplacent en marchant ;• 0,8 % des Rosemèrois se déplacent à vélo.

• There are few sidewalks in the city and the Walkscore is relatively low• No car-sharing or bike-sharing services exist in Rosemere• 80.3% of Rosemère residents travel by car to get to work• 2.9% of Rosemèrois travel by walking• 0.8% of Rosemèrois travel by bicycle

1 MOBILITÉ / MOBILITY

réseau de transport collectif afin de réduire sa forte dépendance à l’automobile et la congestion routière. De plus, elle fera du développement du transport actif intégré et sécuritaire l’une de ses priorités.

Every day, residents make many “trips”, whether it is to work, school, shopping or leisure activities. These trips may be made by car, public transit or active transportation (on foot or by bicycle, for example). Accessibility to destinations and travel conditions (safety, comfort, efficiency, etc.) are closely linked to urban planning. The adoption of a comprehensive approach to sustainable mobility aims to move towards greener, fairer, healthier and more sustainable travel.

In terms of mobility, the Town of Rosemère aims to develop a public transit network in order to reduce its heavy dependence on motor vehicles and road congestion. In addition, it will make the development of integrated, safe active transportation one of its priorities.


NO

PMA

T E

DNA

BN

OP

MAT

ED

NAB

BAN

DE TAM

PON

BANDE TAMPON

MARAIS TYLEE

CLUB DE CURLING

CENTRE


HUBERT-MAISONNEUVE

POSTE DE

USINE DEFILTRATION


ELEMENTARY

HIGH SCHOOL

SCHOOL

SACRÉ-COEUR

BOISBRIAND

LORRAINE

BLAINVILLE

CH

AR

RO

N

RIVIÈRE

CHIENS

RIVIÈRE

MILLE

DES

ÎLES

LAVAL

SAINTE-THÉRÈSE

PLACE ROSEMÈRE

ÎLE DUCHARME

ÎLE GAUDETTE

ÎLE AUX FRAISES

ÎLE PARÉ

LEBOUTHILLIER

CANADIAN TIRE

MANOIR BLEURY

ÉCOLE ALPHA

ÉCOLE

ARÉNA

POLICE

POMPIER

McCRAIG

ROSEMÈRE

EXTERNAT

L'ENCLOS

COMMUNAUTAIRE


RÉSERVE NATURELLE

CHSLD



USINE DEFILTRATION



MARAISBOUTHILLIER

AUX

PARC HAMILTON

CLUB DE CURLING

CENTRE

PARC BOURBONNIÈRE


Rue

Rem

embr

ance

Rue

Bro

adw

ay

HUBERT-MAISONNEUVE

DE VILLEHÔTEL

POSTE DE

USINE DEFILTRATION

ELEMENTARY

HIGH SCHOOL

SCHOOL

SACRÉ-COEUR

BOISBRIAND

LORRAINE

BLAINVILLE

CH

AR

RO

N

RIVIÈRE

RIVIÈRE

MILLE

DES

ÎLES

LAVAL

SAINTE-THÉRÈSE

ANCIEN GOLF DE ROSEMÈRE

ÎLE DUCHARME

ÎLE GAUDETTE

ÎLE AUX FRAISES

ÎLE PARÉ

ÉCOLE ALPHA

ÉCOLE

ARÉNA

POLICE

POMPIER

McCRAIG

ROSEMÈRE

EXTERNAT

L'ENCLOS

COMMUNAUTAIRE

MARÉCAGE

CHSLD



USINE DEFILTRATION


PARC CHARBONNEAU

MARAIS MILLER

GLENDALE

MARAISBOUTHILLIER


BOISBRIAND

LORRAINE

BLAINVILLE

CH

AR

RO

N

RIVIÈRE DES

MILLE

ÎLES

LAVAL

SAINTE-THÉRÈSE

Parc - Ancien golf de Rosemère / Park - former golf of Rosemère

Piste cyclable / Bike path

Route verte

Nouveau lien viaire / New roadway link

Nouveau lien actif / New active transportation linkSecteur patrimonial / Heritage area Corridor écologique à créer / New ecological corridor

Gare de Rosemère / Rosemère train station

Ligne Exo 1 Saint Jérôme - MontréalVILLE DE ROSEMÈRE


PLAN 02: PAYSAGE, PATRIMOINE ET VERDISSEMENT / LANDSCAPE, HERITAGE AND GREENINGLÉGENDE / LEGEND

Milieu humide à conserver / Wetland to be preserved Nouvel axe vert et bleu / New blue and green axis

Zone de végétalisation / Revegetation zone

Malgré sa forte urbanisation, la ville de Rosemère est reconnue comme une ville verte et a obtenu de nombreuses distinctions pour ses initiatives d’embellissement horticole, d’aménagement paysager et de foresterie urbaine. Cependant, les secteurs situés le long du boulevard Labelle, notamment la Place Rosemère, sont des îlots de chaleur urbains majeurs sur le territoire de la Ville. La ville de Rosemère possède plusieurs sites d’intérêt patrimonial. Ses principales typologies sont le vernaculaire américain, le bungalow ancien,

la maison traditionnelle québécoise ou encore l’architecture religieuse. Tous ces éléments font en sorte que la ville de Rosemère est reconnue par ses citoyens pour sa qualité de vie et son identité champêtre.

Despite its strong urbanization, the city of Rosemère is recognized as a green city and has obtained numerous distinctions for its horticultural beautification, landscaping and urban forestry initiatives. However, the sectors located along Labelle Boulevard, notably Place Rosemère, are major urban heat islands on the territory of the City.

The city of Rosemère has several sites of heritage interest. Its main typologies are the American vernacular, the old bungalow, the traditional Quebec house or even religious architecture. All these elements ensure that the city of Rosemère is recognized by its citizens for its quality of life and its rural identity.

• Espaces naturels subissent des pressions au développement ;• Importants îlots de chaleur ;• Plusieurs biens d’intérêt patrimonial non suffisamment protégés ;• Richesse foncière élevée crée une pression pour la démolition de bâtiment.

• Natural Spaces are under pressure to develop• Important heat islands• Several assets of heritage interest that are not sufficiently protected• High land wealth creates pressure for building demolition

• 69 bâtiments patrimoniaux sur le territoire de la Ville de Rosemère et 6 sites ont une citation patrimoniale par la Ville de Rosemère ;

• Le site du domaine Louis-Philippe-Hébert est classé en vertu de la Loi sur les Biens culturels par le Ministère de la Culture et des Communications ;

• 11km2 de foresterie urbaine, 2 grands parcs et 10 parcs locaux ; • Rosemère se distingue par un indice de canopée parmi les plus

élevés de la CMM, avec 41,4% ;• Le ratio d’hectare d’espace vert par personne y est particulièrement

élevé avec 2,0 hectares d’espace vert par 1 000 habitants.

• 69 heritage buildings on the territory of the City of Rosemère and 6 sites on a heri-tage city by the City of Rosemère

• The Louis-Philippe-Hébert estate site is classified under the Cultural Property Act by the Ministry of Culture and Communications

• 11 km2 of urban forestry, 2 large parks and 10 local parks • Rosemère is distinguished by one of the highest canopy index in the CMM, with

41.4%• The ratio of hectares of green space per person is particularly high, with 2.0 hec-

tares of green space per 1,000 inhabitants

• Assurer la conservation et la mise en valeur des milieux naturels afin de protéger l’identité champêtre de la ville et la qualité des cadres de vie ;

• Assurer la gestion durable du territoire de Rosemère pour mieux faire face aux risques des changements climatiques ;

• Assurer la préservation et la mise en valeur du patrimoine identitaire de Rosemère.

• Ensure the conservation and enhancement of natural areas in order to protect the rural identity of the Town and the quality of living environments

• Ensure the sustainable management of the territory of Rosemère in order to better confront the risks of climate change

• Preserve and enhance Rosemère’s identity heritage

• Mettre en valeur les milieux naturels ;• Diminuer les îlots de chaleur en favorisant le verdissement ;• Préserver les espaces verts de Rosemère ;• Anticiper les impacts des changements climatiques dans les années à venir et

assurer une planification territoriale durable ;• Définir le patrimoine et le paysage rosemèrois avec les citoyens ;• Se doter d’outils qui vont permettre de protéger le patrimoine et l’identité de

Rosemère ;• Réaffirmer l’identité des secteurs commerciaux.

• To enhance natural environments• To reduce heat islands by promoting greening• To preserve Rosemère’s green spaces• To anticipate the impacts of climate change in the coming years and ensure sustainable

planning for the territory• To define Rosemère’s heritage and landscape together with residents• To acquire tools that will protect Rosemère’s heritage and identity• To reaffirm the identity of commercial sectors

2

CONTEXTE / CONTEXT

ENJEUX/ ISSUES

ORIENTATIONS

OBJECTIFS / OBJECTIVES FAITS INTÉRESSANTS / INTERESTING FACTS

PAYSAGE, PATRIMOINE ET VERDISSEMENT / LANDSCAPE, HERITAGE AND GREENING


MARAIS TYLEE

CLUB DE CURLING

CENTRE

ÉCOLE VAL-DES-ORMESPOSTE DE

USINE DEFILTRATION


ELEMENTARY

HIGH SCHOOL

SCHOOL

SACRÉ-COEUR

BOISBRIAND

LORRAINE

BLAINVILLE

CH

AR

RO

N

RIVIÈRE

CHIENS

RIVIÈRE

MILLE

DES

ÎLES

LAVAL

SAINTE-THÉRÈSE

PLACE ROSEMÈRE

ÎLE DUCHARME

ÎLE GAUDETTE

ÎLE AUX FRAISES

ÎLE PARÉ

LEBOUTHILLIER

CANADIAN TIRE

MANOIR BLEURY

ÉCOLE ALPHA

ÉCOLE

ARÉNA

POLICE

POMPIER

McCRAIG

ROSEMÈRE

EXTERNAT

L'ENCLOS

COMMUNAUTAIRE


RÉSERVE NATURELLE

CHSLD



USINE DEFILTRATION



MARAISBOUTHILLIER

AUX

PARC HAMILTON

CLUB DE CURLING

CENTRE

PARC BOURBONNIÈRE


Rue

Rem

embr

ance

Rue

Bro

adw

ay

DE VILLEHÔTEL

POSTE DE

USINE DEFILTRATION

ELEMENTARY

HIGH SCHOOL

SCHOOL

SACRÉ-COEUR

BOISBRIAND

LORRAINE

BLAINVILLE

CH

AR

RO

N

RIVIÈRE

RIVIÈRE

MILLE

DES

ÎLES

LAVAL

SAINTE-THÉRÈSE


ÎLE DUCHARME

ÎLE GAUDETTE

ÎLE AUX FRAISES

ÎLE PARÉ

ÉCOLE

ARÉNA

POLICE

POMPIER

McCRAIG

ROSEMÈRE

EXTERNAT

L'ENCLOS

COMMUNAUTAIRE

MARÉCAGE

CHSLD



USINE DEFILTRATION


PARC CHARBONNEAU

MARAIS MILLER

GLENDALE

MARAISBOUTHILLIER


BOISBRIAND

LORRAINE

BLAINVILLE

CH

AR

RO

NRIVIÈRE DES

MILLE

ÎLES

LAVAL

SAINTE-THÉRÈSE

Pôle villageois / Village hub

Axe villageois / Village axis

Parc - Ancien golf de Rosemère /Park - Former Rosemère golf course

Pôle régional Mixte / Mixed-use regional center

Axe régional Mixte / Mixed-use regional axisPôle récréatif régional / Regional recreation hub

Gare de Rosemère / Rosemère Train station

Ligne Exo 1 Saint Jérôme - Montréal / Exo Line 1 Saint Jérôme - Montreal

GARE

P

PLAN 03 : ÉCONOMIE / THE ECONOMYLÉGENDE / LEGEND

Pôles d’activités / Activity centers:

VILLE DE ROSEMÈRE

CONCEPT D'ORGANISATION SPATIALE / URBAN DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT DIAGRAM Pôle - à définir /

Center - to be defined

Mobilité / Mobility:

Espace public / Public space

3 ÉCONOMIE/ ECONOMY

CONTEXTE

ENJEUX/ ISSUES

ORIENTATIONS

OBJECTIFS / OBJECTIVES

Le positionnement stratégique et la vitalité économique attirent des entre-prises créatrices de valeur et d’emplois locaux. La diversification de l’écono-mie stimule la créativité, l’innovation et la synergie entre les établissements. De plus, elle permet aux citoyens de trouver des biens et des services répon-dant à leurs besoins, tout en favorisant l’achat local.

La Ville de Rosemère cherche à repositionner ses pôles économiques existants et améliorer leur performance. La diversification des activités, l’intégration d’une mixité d’usages et l’attraction de nouvelles entreprises sont envisagées pour redonner un souffle à l’économie locale.

• Fragilité de la structure commerciale• Saturation commerciale (locale et régionale)• Dépendance à la taxe non-résidentielle

• Fragility of the business structure• Commercial saturation (local and regional)• Dependence on non-residential tax

FAITS INTÉRESSANTS • L’indice de vitalité de Rosemère permet de la classer au 211e rang parmi

toutes les villes au Québec. Elle appartient au rang des municipalités les plus vitalisées au Québec. Cependant, depuis 2002 l’indice de vitalité économique de Rosemère est en perte de vitesse d’année en année. À titre d’exemple en 2002 Rosemère était en tête de palmarès au 15e rang. Ceci est en partie dû à la stagnation de la croissance démographique ;

• La fonction commerciale totalise 1,8 millions de pieds carrés sur le territoire dont 75 000 pieds carrés sont vacants en 2016 ;

• 47% des revenus de la ville provient de la taxation foncière des commerces ;

• La perte d’un commerce sur le territoire représente la perte d’une taxe trois fois plus importante que la taxe résidentielle ;

• La Place Rosemère représente un pôle économique régional d’envergure et compose avec des enjeux de saturation commerciale. Un certain nombre de grandes surfaces approchent la fin de leur cycle de vie et le changement dans les habitudes de consommation (ex.: achats en ligne) force à revoir leur modèle actuel ;

• L’absence d’une masse critique de population augmente la fragilité de la structure commerciale actuelle ;

• Taux d’inoccupation commerciale est de 16,4% sur le Chemin de la Grande-Côte et les activités économiques y sont diffuses.

• Promouvoir une économie pérenne, durable et diversifiée

• Promote a stable, sustainable and diversified economy.

• Concentrer les services et les commerces de proximité et améliorer la perfor-mance des pôles (secteurs du chemin de la Grande-Côte, de l’ancien Golf, de la Place Rosemère et du boulevard Labelle) ;

• Stimuler l’emploi local et favoriser l’attrait d’entreprises (services professionnels et gestion) ;

• Moderniser les pôles commerciaux en assurant une mixité des fonctions (rési-dentielle et commerciale).

• To concentrate local services and shops and improve the performance of these clusters (in the following sectors: Grande-Côte Road, the former site of golf course, Place Rosemère and La-belle Boulevard)

• To stimulate local employment and promote the attractiveness of businesses (professional ma-nagement and management)

• To modernize hubs of commercial establishments by ensuring a mix of functions (residential and commercial)

Strategic positioning and economic vitality attract businesses that create local value and local jobs. Diversification of the economy stimulates creativity, innovation and synergy between establishments. In addition, it enables residents to find goods and services that meet their needs, while encouraging local shopping.

The Town of Rosemère is seeking to reposition its existing economic hubs and improve their performance. To revitalize the local economy, diversifying activities, integrating a mix of uses and attracting new businesses are being considered.

• Rosemère’s vitality index ranks it 211th among all cities in Quebec. It is one of the most vitalized municipalities in Quebec. However, since 2002, Rosemère’s economic vitality index has been declining year after year. In 2002, for example, Rosemère was ranked 15th on the list. This is partly due to the stagnation of population growth

• The commercial function totals 1.8 million square feet on the territory, of which 75,000 square feet will be vacant in 2016

• 47% of the city’s revenue comes from property taxation of businesses

• The loss of a business on the territory represents the loss of a tax three times greater than that of residential property

• Place Rosemère represents a major regional economic hub and is dealing with issues of commercial saturation. A number of large retailers are nearing the end of their life cycle and the change in consumption habits (e.g.: online shopping) is forcing them to review their current model

• Certain commercial blocks on Labelle Boulevard have a diffuse supply and the absence of critical mass increases the fragility of the businesses

• Commercial vacancy rate is 16.4% on Chemin de la Grande-Côte and economic activities are diffuse

INTERESTING FACTS

CONTEXT


MARAIS TYLEE

CLUB DE CURLING

CENTRE


HUBERT-MAISONNEUVE

POSTE DE

USINE DEFILTRATION


ELEMENTARY

HIGH SCHOOL

SCHOOL

SACRÉ-COEUR

BOISBRIAND

LORRAINE

BLAINVILLE

CH

AR

RO

N

RIVIÈRE

CHIENS

RIVIÈRE

MILLE

DES

ÎLES

LAVAL

SAINTE-THÉRÈSE

PLACE ROSEMÈRE

ÎLE DUCHARME

ÎLE GAUDETTE

ÎLE AUX FRAISES

ÎLE PARÉ

LEBOUTHILLIER

CANADIAN TIRE

MANOIR BLEURY

ÉCOLE ALPHA

ÉCOLE

ARÉNA

POLICE

POMPIER

McCRAIG

ROSEMÈRE

EXTERNAT

L'ENCLOS

COMMUNAUTAIRE


RÉSERVE NATURELLE

CHSLD



USINE DEFILTRATION



MARAISBOUTHILLIER

AUX

PARC HAMILTON

CLUB DE CURLING

CENTRE

PARC BOURBONNIÈRE


Rue

Rem

embr

ance

Rue

Bro

adw

ay

HUBERT-MAISONNEUVE

DE VILLEHÔTEL

POSTE DE

USINE DEFILTRATION

ELEMENTARY

HIGH SCHOOL

SCHOOL

SACRÉ-COEUR

BOISBRIAND

LORRAINE

BLAINVILLE

CH

AR

RO

N

RIVIÈRE

RIVIÈRE

MILLE

DES

ÎLES

LAVAL

SAINTE-THÉRÈSE


ÎLE DUCHARME

ÎLE GAUDETTE

ÎLE AUX FRAISES

ÎLE PARÉ

ÉCOLE ALPHA

ÉCOLE

ARÉNA

POLICE

POMPIER

McCRAIG

ROSEMÈRE

EXTERNAT

L'ENCLOS

COMMUNAUTAIRE

MARÉCAGE

CHSLD



USINE DEFILTRATION


PARC CHARBONNEAU

MARAIS MILLER

GLENDALE

MARAISBOUTHILLIER


BOISBRIAND

LORRAINE

BLAINVILLE

CH

AR

RO

N

RIVIÈRE DES

MILLE

ÎLES

LAVAL

SAINTE-THÉRÈSE

Gare de Rosemère / Rosemère Station

Ligne Exo 1 Saint Jérôme - Montréal

PLAN 03: DÉVELOPPEMENT URBAIN / URBAN DEVELOPMENTLÉGENDE / LEGEND

Réseau ferroviaire / Railway network :

VILLE DE ROSEMÈRE


Aire TOD

Densité, usages et sites stratégiques / Density, land-uses and strategic sites

Parc - Ancien golf / Park - Former golf course

Moyenne densité / Medium density(3-4 étages / floors)Haute densité / High density+4 étages / floors)

Sites de requalification stratégique


Pôle régional Mixte / Mixed-use regional center

Nouveau lien viaire / New roadway link

DÉVELOPPEMENT URBAIN / Urban planning

4

CONTEXTE / CONTEXTLa planification urbaine formule une vision d’ensemble cohérente pour le devenir du territoire en définissant les secteurs d’intervention prioritaires ainsi que les axes de développement stratégique (consolidation, requalification, développement, etc.). Ainsi, nous serons en mesure de répondre aux besoins des populations actuelles et futures en concevant des milieux de vie de qualité, qui s’intègrent en harmonie avec le milieu existant.

La Ville de Rosemère souhaite consolider son territoire par le redéveloppement des secteurs existants et renforcer les pôles d’activités actuels par des développements de qualité.

Urban planning provides a consistent overall vision for the future of the territory by defining the priority sectors of intervention as well as the lines of strategic development (consolidation, requalification, development, etc.). In this way, we will be able to meet the needs of present and future populations by designing quality living environments that integrate in harmony into the existing environment.

The Town of Rosemère wishes to consolidate both its territory, by redeveloping existing sectors, and also its current hubs of activity, through quality developments.

ENJEUX/ ISSUES • Parc de logements peu diversifié ;• Accès à la propriété difficile ;• Vieillissement de la population et nouveaux besoins ;• Perception négative de la densité.

• Little diversified housing stock• Difficult access to property• Aging population and new needs• Negative perception of density

ORIENTATIONS• Répondre aux besoins des populations actuelles et futures en concevant des

milieux de vie de qualité, s’intégrant harmonieusement dans l’environnement bâti et respectant la vocation des différents secteurs ;

• Privilégier le redéveloppement des secteurs existants avant le développement de nouveaux milieux de vie, afin de consolider le territoire.

• Meet the needs of present and future populations by designing quality living environments that can be harmoniously integrated into the built environment and that respect the purpose of the various sectors

• Give priority to the redevelopment of existing sectors before developing new living environments, in order to consolidate the territory

OBJECTIFS / OBJECTIVES• Diversifier les types d’habitation afin de répondre aux besoins de toutes

les générations ;• Assurer la qualité des nouveaux développements en privilégiant des

principes d’aménagement durables (ex. : écoquartiers) ;• Favoriser l’homogénéité des quartiers résidentiels des divers secteurs.

• To diversify housing types to meet the needs of all generations • To ensure the quality of new developments by favouring sustainable development

principles (e.g.,eco-neighbourhoods) • To promote the homogeneity of residential neighbourhoods in the various sectors

FAITS INTÉRESSANTS / INTERESTING FACTSHABITATION / HOUSING• Bien que la densité résidentielle ne soit pas homogène, la moyenne de la ville

est de 4 logements à l’hectare ;• 88% des ménages de Rosemère sont des propriétaires (15% pour la MRC) ;• La typologie des logements est peu diversifiée à Rosemère. 83% des logements

sont des maisons individuelles non attenantes (59% pour la MRC) ;• La valeur moyenne des logements est plus élevée à Rosemère (446 824$) que

dans la MRC (337 073$) : elle est plus importante de près de 25 % ;• 7 logements sur 10 ont été construits avant 1991 (70%) contre 56,3 % pour la

MRC ;• 780 nouvelles unités de logement pour 75 ans et + peuvent être absorbées par

le marché actuel de Rosemère.

• Although the residential density is not homogeneous, the city’s average density is 4 dwellings per hectare

• 88% of households in Rosemere are homeowners (15% for the RCM)• The typology of housing is not very diversified in Rosemère. 83% of the dwellings are

detached single-family houses (59% for the RCM)• The average property value is higher in Rosemère ($446,824) than in the RCM ($337,073): it is

almost 25% higher • 7 out of 10 dwellings were built before 1991 (70%) compared to 56.3% for the RCM • 780 new housing units for 75+ years can be absorbed by the current market in Rosemère

POPULATION • Rosemère compte 13 958 habitants en 2016. La population a légèrement

décru depuis 2011 de -2,4% ;• La moyenne d’âge de la population est de 42 ans (40 ans pour la MRC) ;• Rosemère accueille 10,3% de personnes immigrants (7,7% pour la MRC).

• Rosemere has 13,958 inhabitants in 2016. The population has slightly decreased since 2011 by -2.4%

• The average age of the population is 42 years (40 years for the RCM)• Rosemère welcomes 10.3% immigrants (7.7% for the RCM)

TERRITOIRE/ TERRITORY• La superficie de l’ancien golf est de 0,581km² soit 58 terrains de football ;• On retrouve une aire TOD (transit oriented development) à Rosemère,

autour de sa gare de train. La Communauté métropolitaine de Montréal exige des normes de densité autour des aires TOD;

• Le territoire de Rosemère est développé à 90%.

• The surface area of the former golf course is 0.581km²which reprensents about 58 football fields

• There is a TOD (transit oriented development) area in Rosemère, around its train station. The Communauté métropolitaine de Montréal requires density standards around TOD areas

• The territory of Rosemere is 90% developed


APPENDIX D CONSULTATION FORMS USED ON

FEBRUARY 26, 2020

Pôle villageois de Rosemère / Village Hub

RU

E DE R

OSEM

ÈRE

RU

E CO

UTU

RE

RU

E REM

EMB

RAN

CE

RU

E CO

RO

NA

RU

E CED

AR

RU

E HECTO

R


RUE LABELLE

RU

E PH

ILIPP

E

RU

E TUR

CO

TTE

RU

E MAU

RICE

DRA

LÉDA

EU

R


RUE PERRAULT

RUE PINE

RU

E OVILA

UAE

NN

OB

RAH

C E

UR

RU

E SPR

ING

HILL

RU

E BR

OADW

AY








LÉGEND / LEGEND

MAR

IA

MÉTRO


GARE

P

250 m100 m

1. Créer une piste multifonctionnelle d’un côté du chemin de la Grande-Côte afin de sécuriser les déplacements en vélo

Create a multi-functional path on one side of Grande-Côte Road in order to make cycling safer

2. Favoriser la concentration des activités commerciales de proximité sur le chemin de la Grande-Côte entre les rues Broadway et Remembrance par divers moyens de revitalisation

Promote the concentration of local commercial activities along Grande-Côte Road between Broadway and Remembrance streets through various means of revitalization

3. Conserver la densité permise sur le chemin de la Grande-Côte Maintain the density allowed on Grande-Côte Road

4. Assurer la préservation du patrimoine naturel de Rosemère au sud du chemin de la Grande-Côte en restreignant l’occupation du sol Preserve Rosemère’s natural heritage south of Grande-Côte Road by restricting land use

5. Encadrer l’intégration des nouvelles constructions au milieu naturel existant Provide a framework for the integration of new construction into the existing natural environment

6. Faire l’acquisition à juste prix du terrain sur le chemin de la Grande-Côte, entre les rues Maria et Adélard, afin de créer une place publique aménagée et animée, au coeur du pôle villageois At a fair price, acquire the land on Grande-Côte Road (between De l’Église and Adélard streets) in order to create a lively, landscaped public square in the heart of the village hub

7. Prévoir le redéveloppement du site entre les rues William et Couture en un ensemble résidentiel de faible et moyenne densité Plan the redevelopment of the site between William and Couture streets into a low - and medium-density residential complex

8. Privilégier une meilleure intermodalité à Rosemère grâce, notamment, à une offre de transport collectif bonifiée autour de la gare de train de banlieue

Prioritize better intermodality in Rosemère, particularly through improved public transit service around the commuter train station


SYNTHÈSE / SUMMARY

Bâtiments d’intérêt patrimonial à Rosemère: 69Properties of heritage interest in Rosemère

Indice de canopée de la ville de Rosemère: 41,4% Canopy index of the town of Rosemere

Nombre de voyages de train en période de pointe: 13Number of train trips during peak periods

Nombre de places de stationnement à la gare de Rosemère: 382Number of parking spaces at Rosemère station

Taux d’occupation du stationnement de la gare de Rosemère: 100% Occupancy rate of the Rosemère train station parking lot

Nombre approximatif d’usagers de transport en commun par jour: 1 096Approximate number of transit riders per day

Proportion d’usagers utilisant la gare, provenant de Rosemère: 61%Proportion of users using the station, originating from Rosemère

Rayon d’attractivité de la gare de Rosemère: 16 kmAttractiveness radius of the Rosemère railway station

Taux d’utilisation de l’automobile pour les déplacements courants: 80% Automobile usage rate for routine trips

Valeur approximative du terrain entre les rues Adélard et Maria: 950k $ (2018) Approximate purchase value of the site between Adélard and Maria

Êtes-vous en accord ou en désaccord avec les pistes de solution suivantes? Pourquoi? Y a-t-il des divergences à votre table? C’est normal! Vous pouvez passer au vote et indiquer combien de personnes sont en accord et combien sont en désaccord avec la proposition. Do you agree or disagree with the following solutions? Why or why not? Are there differences at your table? This is normal! You can take a vote and indicate how many people agree and disagree.

POURQUOI ? / WHY ?


Nom du facilitateur/Facilitator’s name:



–+


Pôle régional de Rosemère / Regional center


Require that all development projects meet the criteria of the overall development plan (ODP) and a specifique residents’ approval process

2. Créer et optimiser des liens de transport actif et collectif vers la Place Rosemère Create and optimize active and public transit links to Place Rosemère

3. Aménager une place publique sur le site de la Place Rosemère Create a public plaza on the Place Rosemère site

4. Prévoir une zone de moyenne densité résidentielle sur le site de la Place Rosemère, en bordure du boulevard Bouthillier et de haute densité du côté de l’autoroute 640 et du boulevard Labelle

Plan a medium-density residential area on the Place Rosemère site, along Bouthillier Boulevard, as well as a high-density residential area along Autoroute 640 and Labelle Boulevard

5. Réduire les îlots de chaleur en augmentant la canopée, en végétalisant les secteurs commerciaux et en encourageant le stationnement souterrain

Reduce heat islands by increasing the canopy, greening commercial sectors and by encouraging underground parking

6. Favoriser l’encadrement du boulevard Labelle et la convivialité des déplacements actifs en localisant les commerces plus près du boulevard

Insure that the Boulevard Labelle is bordered with trees and buildings instead of parking lots and that it is user-friendly for all by promoting secure active transportation

7. Privilégier la fonction commerciale ou mixte du côté ouest du boulevard et résidentielle du côté est afin d’éviter la saturation commerciale

Promote commercial or mixed uses on the westside of the boulevard and a residential use on the east side to avoid commercial saturation

8. Assurer une intégration harmonieuse de la densité (moyenne ou haute) dans le redéveloppement du pôle régional, notamment en favorisant une gradation douce des densités

Ensure the harmonious integration of medium or high density in the redevelopment of the regional hub, particularly by encouraging a moderate increase in densities

9. Transformer le boulevard Labelle en véritable boulevard urbain avec la présence de jardins de pluie, de végétation et de traverses piétonnières sécuritaires

Transform Labelle Boulevard into a true urban boulevard with rain gardens, vegetation and safe pedestrian crossings.

10. Encourager le stationnement souterrain et la végétalisation des stationnements existants

Encourage underground parking and the greening of existing parking lots


Require that all development projects meet the criteria of the overall development plan (ODP)8 and a specific residents’ approval process

12. Envisager la création d’un lien accessible au transport véhiculaire et actif d’est en ouest dans l’axe Bouthillier/ Roland-Durand, afin de désengorger le chemin de la Grande-Côte

Consider creating a link accessible to motor vehicle and active transportation from east to west in the Bouthillier/Rolland-Durand corridor, in order to relieve congestion on Grande-Côte Road

13. Conférer une vocation « parc » à un minimum de 50 % du site de l’ancien Golf et le rendre accessible à tous les citoyens. Celui-ci comprendra des espaces de conservations des milieux naturels et des zones tampons avec le cadre bâti actuel

Designate at a minimum of 50% of the former site of the golf course as “park” use and make it accessible to all residents. This will include spaces for the conservation of natural environments as well as buffer zones with the existing built environment

14. Prévoir une zone de haute densité résidentielle sur le site de l’ancien Golf, près de l’autoroute 640 et de moyenne densité le long du boulevard Labelle

Provide for a high-density residential zone on the former site of the golf course, near Autoroute 640, as well as a medium-density zone along Labelle Boulevard

15. Assurer la présence d’une diversité de logements, notamment des logements abordables

Ensure the availability of a variety of housing options, including affordable housing

16. Assurer la protection des milieux humides et des espèces arboricoles à haut potentiel de biodiversité ainsi qu’une gestion durable des eaux de pluie sur le site

Protect wetlands and tree species with high biodiversity potential, and provide a sustainable stormwater management on the site

17. Conserver la topographie naturelle du site Preserve the natural topography of the site

18. Créer un corridor écologique sur le site afin de relier les espaces naturels entre eux et favoriser la biodiversité sur le site

Create an ecological corridor on the former golf site to link the natural areas together and to promote biodiversity

19. Créer une zone tampon verte entre les quartiers résidentiels existants et le développement résidentiel du site

Create a green buffer zone between the existing residential areas and the residential development of the site

20. Assurer la présence de liens actifs à l’intérieur du site de l’ancien Golf, en minimisant leur impact au sol dans les milieux sensibles (milieux humides)

Ensure the presence of active links within the site, minimizing their impact on the ground in sensitive areas (wetlands)

21. Positionner le développement résidentiel du site comme un projet d’écoquartier, ayant de hauts standards environnementaux et qui représente les valeurs des rosemèrois

Position the residential development of the site as an eco-neighbourhood project, with high environmental standards and representing Rosemerites’ values

22. Privilégier le stationnement souterrain sur le site Prioritize underground parking on the site

23. Planifier l’espace pour une nouvelle école secondaire qui occuperait 10% de la superficie du site (comme le stipule la nouvelle loi 40 du Gouvernement du Québec)

Planning space for a new high school which would occupy 10% of the surface of the site (as stipulated in the new Government of Quebec Act 40)

Parc - Ancien golf de RosemèrePark - Former golf of Rosemère

Pôle d’activité / Activity centers:

BOULEVARD BOUTHILIER

BO

ULEVAR

D LAB

ELLE

PLACE ROSEMÈRE

RU

E WESTG

ATE

RU

E GO

LFRID

GE

RU

E FLOR

IAN

MAIL

LIW

EU

R

BOULEVARD ROLAND DURAND

UAET

ÔC

UD

EU

R

RUE DE LA CLAIR

IÈERE

300 m100 m

SECTEURS DE PLANIFICATION DÉTAILLÉE SCHÉMATISÉS / DETAILED PLANNING AREAS

PLAN 02 : ANCIEN GOLF ET PLACE ROSEMÈRE / FORMER GOLF AND PLACE ROSEMÈRE

LÉGENDE / LEGEND

Axe régional mixte / Mixed-use regional axis

Pôle régional mixte / Mixed-use regional center

Lien viaire à créer / New roadway connection Lien actif à créer / New active transportation link


Mobilité et liens de connectivité / Mobility and connection links:

Densité proposée / Proposed building density:: Composantes naturelles / Natural components:

Moyenne densité /Medium density(3-4 étages / floors)

Haute densité / High density+4 étages / floors)

Corridor écologique à créer /New ecological corridor

Milieu humide protégé /Protected wetland


BAN

DE TAM

PO

NB

AND

E TAMP

ON

BANDE TAMPON

BAN

DE TAM

PON

Intersection sécurisée / Secured intersection

Stationnement étagé / Parkade


Superficie du site de l’ancien golf: 0,581km²Surface area of former golf siteDensité résidentielle moyenne: 4 log/ha.Average residential densityPourcentage du territoire de Rosemère qui est construit: 90%Percentage of Rosemère’s territory that is builtProportion de l’usage résidentiel sur le territoire: 53%Proportion of residential use on the territoryProportion de maisons unifamiliales isolées: 83%Proportion of single-family detached homesProportion de propriétaires d’un logement: 88%Proportion of home owners Proportion des revenus de taxation provenant des commerces: 47%Proportion of tax revenues from businessesProportion de travailleurs à domicile: 11%Proportion of homeworkersMoyenne d’âge de la population: 42 ansAverage age of populationNombre de nouvelles unités de logement pour 75 ans et + 780pouvant être absorbées par le marché actuel: Number of new housing units for 75 years and over that can be absorbed by the current market

Êtes-vous en accord ou en désaccord avec les pistes de solution suivantes? Pourquoi? Y a-t-il des divergences à votre table? C’est normal! Vous pouvez passer au vote et indiquer combien de personnes sont en accord et combien sont en désaccord avec la proposition.

Do you agree or disagree with the following solutions? Why or why not? Are there differences at your table? This is normal! You can take a vote and indicate how many people agree and disagree.

POURQUOI ? / WHY ?




SYNTHÈSE / SUMMARY

Nom du facilitateur/Facilitator’s name:

–+

BOULEVARD LABELLE

SITE DE L’ANCIEN GOLF / FORMER GOLF SITE

PLACE ROSEMÈRE


PROJECT TEAM

Sylvain Gariépy Urban Planner, Associate

Julie Bergeron Environmental designer

Gautier Lutz Environmental designer

FACILITATION TEAM

Julie Bergeron Environmental designer

Gautier Lutz Environmental designer

Sophie Sayad Environmental designer

Karine Verrette Environmental designer

Simon Robert Urban studies student External ressource

Léonard Duchesneau Urban studies student External ressource Chantelle L'Heureux External ressource

Documents

PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORT PARTICIPATORY PROJECT TO … public consultation report participatory project to revise the urban development master plan of the town of rosemÈre june 2020