Upload
coral
View
38
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Overview of Grid Computing Environments Proposed GGF Information Document G.Fox, D. Gannon, M. Pierce, M. Thomas. PTLIU Laboratory for Community Grids Geoffrey Fox Computer Science, Informatics, Physics Indiana University, Bloomington IN 47404 http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu/ptliupages. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Overview of Grid Computing EnvironmentsProposed GGF Information Document
G.Fox, D. Gannon, M. Pierce, M. Thomas
PTLIU Laboratory for Community GridsGeoffrey Fox
Computer Science, Informatics, Physics
Indiana University, Bloomington IN 47404
http://grids.ucs.indiana.edu/ptliupages
Source of Report• Last Half of 2001: Call from GCE RG for Papers for
Journal special issues – 28 papers submitted and reviewed
• Published in Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience Vol. 14, Grid Computing Environments Special Issue 13-15, Fall 2002
• http://aspen.ucs.indiana.edu/gce/gce2001index.html• Augmented by chapters (about 14) in Fran Berman,
Geoffrey Fox and Tony Hey, ‘Grid Computing: Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality’, ISBN 0-470-85319-0, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, 2003. See http://www.grid2002.org
• Other key papers which we knew about
Raw (HPC) Resources Database
AggregationPortal
SystemServices
SystemServices
SystemServices
Application Service
PortalServices
PortalServices
GridComputing
Environments
UserServices
“Core”Grid
Application Service
OGSA (OGSI) Interfaces
The fuzzy definition of Grid Computing Environments
Two Major Areas• “Programming the User Side of the Grid”
which involves discussing computing model for Grid
• Controlling user interaction – rendering any output and allowing user input in some (web) page. – This includes aggregation of multiple data
sources in a single portal page (Jetspeed). – Has natural overlaps with information
(commercial) portals
Classification of GCE Papers in Programming the User Side of the Grid
• Technology for building GCE systems -Interface with backend Infrastructure e.g. Community Grid Kits, GPDK
• Problem Solving Environments– Domain specific collection of tools and user interface. E.g. XCAT,
Polder, SCIRun, Astrophysics Collaboratory
• GCE Tools– Support parameter sweep, visualization, job status, files, security,
workflow ..
• GCE Shell Portals providing a general interface to many Grid capabilities– Analogous (not usually command line) to role of UNIX shell providing
access to UNIX tools and user programs, files …– Note UNIX has core system and higher level tools accessed by Shell– E.g. Unicore, Hotpage, Mississippi Portal– PSE’s often built on top of GCEShell portals
Aspects of Programming Model I• See review of programming model by GGF APM RG
– Chapter 21 of Wiley Book and web page
• Handling of the basic components of a distributed computing system – files, computing and data resources, programs, and accounts. – The GCE will typically interface with an environment like Globus or a
batch scheduler like PBS to actually handle the back-end resources. – However the GCE will present the user interfaces to handle these
resources.
• We can follow the lead of UNIX (and Legion) and define a basic GCEShell providing access to the core distributed computing functions. – JXTA also builds some Grid-like capabilities with a modification of UNIX
shell model. – GCEShell can have a command line or more visually appealing
graphical user interface.
Implications of 3-Tier Model• The 3-tier model implies that any given capability (say
run a matrix inversion program) can appear at multiple levels. – Maybe there is a backend parallel computer running an MPI
job; this is front-ended perhaps as a service by some middle-tier component running on a totally different computer, which could even be in a different security domain.
– One can “interact” with this service at either level; a high performance I/O transfer at the parallel computing level and/or by a slower middle-tier protocol like SOAP at the service level.
– These two (or more) calls (component interactions) can represent different functions or the middle tier call can be coupled with a high performance mirror.
• Typically the middle tier provides control and the back end “raw data transfer”.
Raw (HPC) Resources Database
AggregationPortal
SystemServices
SystemServices
SystemServices
Application Service
PortalServices
PortalServices
GridComputing
Environments
UserServices
“Core”Grid
Application ServiceApplication Metadata
Actual Application
OGSA (OGSI) Interfaces
The fuzzy definition of Grid Computing Environments
Technology for building GCE Systems
• CoG Kits for Java Perl Python CORBA ….
• GPDK extending CoG kits with JavaBean and JSP middleware
• Grid Portal Toolkit
• Other such interfaces with also C and XML tools
• Event Service
• Simulations
GCEShell Portals and PSE’s• One can divide GCE capabilities into
generic (copy file) or domain specific (generate the multigrid solver suitable to simulate Middle Earth)
• Correspondingly one finds portal frameworks or GCEShell Portals presenting general capabilities
• Grid or web-based Problem Solving Environments optimized for a particular domain– PSE’s are often (and perhaps should be) built
on top of GCFShell Portals
Typical Layered Architecture
GCEShell Portals
Globus GT2 ServicesManage backend resources
Interface Middleware withbackend resources
Core Middleware Services
Application ServicesProblem Solving
Environments
User Interface-Client
Aggregate component InterfacesJetspeed
GCE Tools• Data Management
– File manipulation in all tiers including client, middleware and back end
• Security– In all tiers and providing interfaces to core Grid
Security
• Workflow or “Programming the Grid”• Grid versions of MPI• Higher-level tools include visualization or
support of parameter sweep applications– UNIX Shell has mix of lower level and higher
level tools
More on Programming Models• Basic 2-level programming model is assumed by
most projects– First you use classic (parallel) programming to produce
“simulation” nuggets (wrapped as application web services)
– JDBC / OGSA-DAI to package data resources as objects or services
• Then you need to compose (orchestrate) the control and dataflow between nuggets – Many different models for how this is to be done and can
call this workflow – Next thrust of GCE RG?
• Some work on optimization between levels as in GrADS project
Research in “2-level” Programming Models• Basic user interface to middle tier proxies controlling
backend (software) resources• Component Models like ICENI (Imperial College) or
DoE Common Component Architecture• Commercial workflow engines as in BPEL4WS• Scripting front-ends as in Matlab or Python• Network server model as in NetSolve or Ninf• Computational Economies• Semantic Grid technologies (ontology based
integration of resources) as in MyGrid or DiscoveryNet• Agents?
Programming Infrastructure (Hosting Environment)
• Different approachs assume different run-time (implementation) and user programming “ether”
• BPEL4WS thinks about specifying interactions between components; Matlab interface invokes components from a script
• Java Interface to OGSI WG emphasizes that we don’t have an established implementation even if you pick a language– Jini– JXTA– Servlet– Enterprise JavaBeans EJB– Or perhaps some future SJB (Scientific JavaBean)
supporting high volume dataflow better than EJB (short transactions)
Web Services as a Portlet• Each Web Service naturally
has a user interface specified as “just another port” – Customizable for universal access
• This gives each Web Service a Portlet view specified (in XML as always) by WSRP (Web services for Remote Portals)
• So component model for resources “automatically” gives a component model for user interfaces– When you build your
application, you define portletat same time
Application orContent source
WSDL
Web Service
S
R
W
P
Application as a WSGeneral Application PortsInterface with other WebServices
User Face ofWeb ServiceWSRP Ports define WS as a Portlet
Web Services have other ports (Grid Service) to be OGSI compliant
Online Knowledge Center built from Portlets
• Web Services provide a component model for the middleware (see large “common component architecture” effort in Dept. of Energy)
• Should match each WSDL component with a corresponding user interface component
• Thus one “must use” a component model for the portal with again an XML specification (portalML) of portal component
A set of UIComponents
Content Provider
WSDL
Web Service
F
I
U
O
F
I
R
O
PortalAggregate
WS-User Facing Fragments
Render
Other WSUser FacingPorts
Other WSResource orService-facingPorts User-facing
Ports
User Facing Ports for Web Service
UserProfile
Application orContent source
WSDL
Web Service
F
I
U
O
F
I
R
O
Render
Portal(Aggregator)
Selector
Filter
Control Channel
Customized View
SelectionView
Control Channel
Customized View
CustomizedUser-Facing
PortsAs used in Universal Access
PortletPortlet PortletPortlet PortletPortlet PortletPortlet
XMLRSS, OCS, or otherLocal or remote
HTMLLocal files
JSP or VMLocal templates
WebPageRemote HTML
PortletPortlet
PortletsUser implementedusing Portal API
Portlets
Data
PortletController PortletController
Screen Manager
HTML
PSML
PortletControl
ECS
JSP template
ECS ECS ECS ECS
ECS ECS ECS
ECS Root to HTML
ECS
Turbine ServletJetspeedArchitecture
Portlets and Portal Stacks• User interfaces to Portal
services (Code Submission, Job Monitoring, File Management for Host X) are all managed as portlets.
• Users, administrators can customize their portal interfaces to just precisely the services they want.
Core Grid Services
User facing Web Service Ports
Application Grid Web Services
Aggregation Portals(Jetspeed)
Messa
ge S
ecu
rity, In
form
atio
n
Serv
ices
Lists user files on selected host, noahsark.File operations include
Upload, download, Copy, rename, crossload
Tabs indicate availableportlet interfaces.
File management