View
222
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lexical access How do we retrieve the linguistic
information from Long-term memory? What factors are involved in retrieving
information from the lexicon? Models of lexical retrieval
Recognizing a word
cat
dogcapwolftreeyarncat
clawfurhat
Search for a match Select word
cat
Retrieve lexical
information
CatnounAnimal, pet,Meows, furry,Purrs, etc.
cat
Input
Lexical access Factors affecting lexical access
Frequency Semantic priming Role of prior context Phonological structure Morphological structure Lexical ambiguity
Word frequency
GambastyaReveryVoitleChardWefeCratilyDecoyPuldowRaflot
MulvowGovernorBlessTugletyGareReliefRuftilyHistoryPindle
Lexical Decision Task:
OrioleVulubleChaltAwrySignetTraveCrockCrypticEwe
DevelopGardotBusyEffortGarvolaMatchSardPleasantCoin
Word frequency
GambastyaReveryVoitleChardWefeCratilyDecoyPuldowRaflot
MulvowGovernorBlessTugletyGareReliefRuftilyHistoryPindle
Lexical Decision Task:
Lexical Decision is dependent on word frequency
OrioleVulubleChaltAwrySignetTraveCrockCrypticEwe
DevelopGardotBusyEffortGarvolaMatchSardPleasantCoin
Low frequency High(er) frequency
Word frequency
The kite fell on the dog
Eyemovement studies: Subjects spend about 80
msecs longer fixating on low-frequency words than high-frequency words
Semantic priming Meyer & Schvaneveldt (1971)
Lexical Decision TaskPrime Target
TimeNurse Butter
940 msecsBread Butter
855 msecs Evidence that associative relations
influence lexical access
Role of prior context
Listen to short paragraph. At some point during theParagraph a string of letters will appear on the screen. Decide if it is an English word or not. Say ‘yes’ or ‘no’ as quickly as you can.
Role of prior context Swinney (1979)
Hear: “Rumor had it that, for years, the government bulding has been plagued with problems. The man was not surprised when he found several spiders, roaches and other bugs in the corner of his room.”
Lexical Decision taskContext related: antContext inappropriate: spyContext unrelated sew
Results and conclusions Within 400 msecs of hearing "bugs", both ant and
spy are primed After 700 msecs, only ant is primed
Lexical ambiguity Hogaboam and Pefetti (1975)
Words can have multiple interpretations The role of frequency of meaning
Task, is the last word ambiguous? The jealous husband read the letter (dominant
meaning) The antique typewriter was missing a letter
(subordinate meaning) Participants are faster on the second sentence.
Morphological structure Snodgrass and Jarvell (1972)
Do we strip off the prefixes and suffixes of a word for lexical access?
Lexical Decision Task: Response times greater for affixed words than
words without affixes Evidence suggests that there is a stage where
prefixes are stripped.
Models of lexical access Serial comparison models
Search model (Forster, 1976, 1979, 1987, 1989)
Parallel comparison models Logogen model (Morton, 1969) Cohort model (Marslen-Wilson, 1987,
1990)
Logogen model (Morton 1969)Auditory stimuli
Visual stimuli
Auditory analysis
Visual analysis
Logogen system
Outputbuffer
Context system
Responses
Available Responses
Semantic Attributes
Logogen model
The lexical entry for each word comes with a logogen
The lexical entry only becomes available once the logogen ‘fires’
When does a logogen fire? When you read/hear the word
Think of a logogen as being like a ‘strength-o-meter’ at a fairground
When the bell rings, the logogen has ‘fired’
‘cat’[kæt]
• What makes the logogen fire?
– seeing/hearing the word
• What happens once the logogen has fired?
– access to lexical entry!
– High frequency words have a lower threshold for firing
–e.g., cat vs. cot
‘cat’[kæt]
• So how does this help us to explain the frequency effect?
‘cot’[kot]
Low freq takes longer
• Spreading activation from doctor lowers the threshold for nurse to fire
– So nurse take less time to fire
‘nurse’[nə:s]
‘doctor’[doktə]
nurse
doctor
Spreading activation network
doctor nurse
Search modelE
ntri
es in
ord
er o
f
Dec
reas
ing
freq
uenc
yVisual input
cat
Auditory input
/kat/
Access codes
Pointers
mat cat mouseMental lexicon
Cohort model Specifically for auditory word recognition
Speakers can recognize a word very rapidly Usually within 200-250 msec
Recognition point (uniqueness point) - point at which a word is unambiguously different from other words and can be recognized
Three stages of word recognition1) activate a set of possible candidates2) narrow the search to one candidate3) integrate single candidate into semantic and
syntactic context
Cohort model Prior context: “I took the car for a …”
/s/ /sp/ /spi/ /spin/
…soapspinachpsychologistspinspitsunspank…
spinachspinspitspank…
spinachspinspit…
spin
time