Upload
augustine-reeves
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
The auditing function of Supreme Audit Institutions
A systematic mapping of the auditing assignments of selected
SAIs across the regions of INTOSAI
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
OBJECTIVES
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
Background• Harmonization Project– to strengthen the consistency of the professional
standards– provide general recommendations on auditing for
all SAIs– draft due process for developing, revising and
withdrawing ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs– the need to update the fundamental auditing
principles
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
Objectives• Gather information on audit assignments in the mandates
of SAIs: – scope, subject, criteria – resolve of the audit– reporting to intended users.
• Develop distinctions between different kinds of assignments: – to provide a statement of assurance – other assignments
• Mapping the mandates of SAIs – to obtain an overview of the different legal mandates of SAIs in
relation to the audit assignments– to define a “common language” for explaining and comparing
the tasks of SAIs across their different national settings
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
Context
• The need for restructuring level three in the ISSAI Framework
• The initial assessment is a mapping of selected SAI mandates– requires a conceptual framework
• INTOSAI needs a coherent logical consistent framework of standards for SAIs
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
METHOD
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
Method• Conceptual framework– Well defined concept in a glossary as basis for the
mapping
• The survey– Collection of data with assistance from the
regional representative– 39 selected SAIs
• Comparison– Categorizing similarities and differences
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
FINDINGS
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
The scope of the audit assignment
• The scope of the mandate is defined in different ways
• Detailed and less detailed audit assignment• Conditions for the conduct of audits by the SAI– Fixed tasks– Discretionary tasks
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
The subject and audit criteria • Each branch of audit has its own audit criteria:– Financial audit– Compliance audit– Performance audit
• General distinction with regard to the subject– conclusion concerning a subject matter– subject matter information
• Criteria in public sector audit:– process– outcome– report
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
The conclusions to be reached • Depending on the scope of mandate which is
defined in different ways• Conclusions expressing assurance (reasonable
and limited assurance)• Other types of conclusions– an assessment– an investigate audit– a decision of discharge
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
The intended users of SAI reporting• Executive informed by the result of the audit
– during the process as contradiction– information of the cabinet
• Parliament – Request tasks reported to parliament– Assessments reported to parliament– Expressions of assurance on global level
parliament• Head of state
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
Conclusions • The legal mandates of SAIs are emphasizing audit
assignments as an integrated part of the governance system in a context of accountability.
• The basic function of SAIs is – to provide audit or assurance services by comparing
economic information with a framework for financial reporting
– to produce knowledge derived from the conduct of audit investigations, which creates the basis for the implementation of corrective actions
• This is the central foundation for a future harmonization project of the Fundamental Auditing Principles.
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
Recommendations for the harmonization project
• The general function and powers of SAIs should be the starting point
• Maintain the three general branches of auditing • Distinguish between different styles of conclusion used by
SAIs : – express assurance – other styles
• The need to recognize the tasks of Court of Accounts, Auditor Generals as well as other SAIs in all INTOSAI regions
• Reporting to different intended users by combining different kinds of conclusions
PSCINTOSAI Professional Standards Committee
Next step !
Which reflections and additional comments do this report raise?