PSB – Linac 4 Synchronization Alfred Blas PSB with Linac 4 Working group meeting 24/04/2009 1 Summary of discussions held with M.E. Angoletta, C. Carli,

PSB – Linac 4 SynchronizationPSB – Linac 4 Synchronization

Alfred BlasPSB with Linac 4 Working group meeting PSB with Linac 4 Working group meeting

24/04/200924/04/2009 11

Summary of discussions held withM.E. Angoletta, C. Carli, M. Chanel, A. Findlay, F. Pedersen

Chopper limitations and ring rf synchronizationChopper limitations and ring rf synchronization


24/04/200924/04/2009 22

Chopper timing limitations:

20 ns < TNO BEAM < 1000 ns45 ns < TBEAM

In other words: when the beam is not wanted towards the PSB, small bursts of 40 ns every 1000 ns will still be sent.

In the Head or Tail Dump, it is not yet known if this 4% duty cycle is acceptable, but for the switching from one ring to another, this is considered as non acceptable

The distributor rise time from one ring to the following is planned to be < 500 ns. If the rf (1 MHz) phase was erratic, the total “BEAM OFF” time could be as long as 1500 ns. This value cannot be reached by the chopper.

Conclusion: The rf needs to be in a pre-programmed phase at injection and thus synchronized in some way.

PSB Injection schemePSB Injection scheme


24/04/200924/04/2009 33

The main dipolar field in the PSB will be ramping-up during injection (1.2 T/s).The longest injection will take 100 μs in each ring

=>The field increase will be 1.2 G/100μs

=> ΔE = 154 keV/100 μs if following the ΔR=0 frequency law (bucket height = 2.5 MeVP-P and σ of the Linac 4 energy distribution = 0.12 MeV)

=> ΔR = -0.8 mm/100μs if following the Δp = 0 frequency law

Δp = -14.3 keV/100μs and ΔR = -0.86 mm/100 μs if staying at Δf = 0.

Δf = 379 Hz/100 μs if following the ΔR=0 frequency law



24/04/200924/04/2009 44

Operational constraint:The hardware setup will be such as to allow different type of injections:

1.Injection in a stationary rf bucket (fixed rf frequency)2.Injection in an accelerating bucket (rf frequency following a ΔR=0 law)3.Injection with any type of rf frequency variation law .

Magnetic field increase + the duration of each injection (up to 100 μs) A correction needs to be applied to get the proper “beam energy - field - trajectory” trio.



24/04/200924/04/2009 55

Field - Energy:

1.No field correction => Linac 4 energy increased by < 154 x 4 = 617 keV to keep the proper trajectory. This solution is abandoned as the longitudinal painting already uses the total dynamic range (+/- 1 MeV) of the transfer line from Linac 4 to PSB

2.BdL dipolar correction elements offset to cancel the field rise from one injection to the following. This way each ring will have the same “beam energy - field - trajectory” trio. Only the offset of the field being corrected, the Linac 4 energy will have to be increased by 154 keV/100μs (max ramping with a ΔR=0 frequency law). This will be the default type of operation.

3.Total Field increase correction. The feasibility has not been studied and might be impaired by the limited bandwidth of the BdL system. This type of correction would be perfect for a capture process at a fixed frequency and fixed energy

Conclusion:1.The 4 rf are to be synchronized at injection2.the magnetic field at injection is to be equal in all rings thanks to the BdL3.The Linac4 energy is to be modulated to adapt to the acceleration during the capture process in each ring

PSB Injection SynchronizationPSB Injection Synchronization


24/04/200924/04/2009 66

From the previous slides we learnt that the PSB rings should be synchronized to a reference at injection and that the Linac energy would have to be ramped up to cope with the magnetic field increase.

The injection synchronization needs a reference frequency source.1.It could be an external generator of a standard CO type (Pentek). This unit is ppm programmable but cannot adapt in real time to a magnetic field change.

Is it a problem having a fixed frequency reference instead of one being able to adapt to the real time measurement of the magnetic field?

Can the Linac4 energy adapt to the real time measurement of B?

Can the bucket filling timing adapt to the real time measurement of B?



24/04/200924/04/2009 77

The magnetic field measurement precision is claimed to be in the order of 100 ppm. The precision of the power supplies (set value to obtained value) is of the same order. Choosing the measured value or the set value seems to create the same potential error. For a 2311 Gauss injection field, this corresponds to a maximum error of 0.2 Gauss.

If the rf reference frequency stays fixed and doesn’t correspond to the real magnetic field ( in terms of ΔR = 0 law), the 0.2 Gauss will correspond to an rf bucket being shifted by -2.4 keV (0.1% of the bucket height or 2% of the Linac4 one sigma energy spread) and an orbit offset of -0.14 mm.

If the idea is to track the B-train with the rf reference (in case we don’t trust the control), the rf bucket will be shifted up by +25.6 keV for an extra two 0.1Gauss tics. This corresponds to 1% of the bucket height and 20% of the Linac4 one sigma energy spread.

If the rf reference is updated, the calculated bucket filling phases (if not updated) can be wrong up to ΔφREV < 63 Hz x 400μs x 360o = 9o. (63 Hz corresponds to ΔB=0.2 Gauss and ΔR=0)



24/04/200924/04/2009 88

Conclusion: Adapting the rf reference to the measured B field doesn’t give more precision (in terms of evaluation of the real field) than using the programmed value. This choice would imply to adapt in real time the Linac4 energy and to modify (also in real time) the turn-per-turn timing values of the chopper.

This possible real time compensation of the Linac energy and bucket painting timing requires an investment which is not supported.

Conclusion:1. The 4 rf are to be synchronized at injection to a pre-

programmed reference source2. the magnetic field at injection is to be equal in all rings thanks

to the BdL3. The Linac4 energy is to be modulated to adapt to the

acceleration during the capture process in each ring

Synchronization with Linac 4Synchronization with Linac 4


24/04/200924/04/2009 99

Recap:While the magnetic field is ramping up at 1.2 T/s, different type of injections will be allowed:1.Injection in a stationary rf bucket (fixed rf frequency)2.Injection in an accelerating bucket (rf frequency following a ΔR=0 law)3.Injection with any type of rf frequency variation law .

From the Linac4 point of view, the initial rf buckets in each ring will be similar but with a specific phase.

How will the phase difference between rings be programmed by the application?

Due to the 1000ns maximum OFF state of the beam and due to the 500ns rise time of the distributor, a dephasing of 500ns between rings would sound right.

It is estimated here that the distributor rise time is identical even when ring 1 is being filled just after ring 4 (3 rings jump).



24/04/200924/04/2009 1010

Let’s check if the 500 ns dephasing is fine in all cases.

Let’s try the most critical scenario (not realistic?) in this context:

Before switching to ring n-x, ring n bucket is filled from rf phase 0o to rf phase 10o; We then wait until the end of the revolution period and switch to the n-x ring.In ring n-x only the interval from rf phase 350o to 360o is being filled-up.

This operation would means 340o (rev phase)+ 500 ns = 1444 ns of beam chopping.This is not achievable by the chopper!!

In such a case the ring switching should be started before the end of the revolution in ring n (just after 10o in our case). Then, after the 500 ns of the distributor rise, the rev phase in ring n-x should be close to 350o where the bucket filling is being started.

Conclusion: The application which determines the chopper timing for the bucket filling should also take care of the distributor timing.

Chopper timingChopper timing


24/04/200924/04/2009 1111

The role of the chopper is to inhibit the beam in these different case:

1. When the distributor is in the head or tail dump position2. During the switching time of the distributor (<500 ns)3. During the PSB injection process where the beam is out of the bucket4. During the PSB injection process where the beam density is required to be low

(bunch shaping).

The chopper has its own constraints: 20 ns < TNO BEAM < 1000 ns45 ns < TBEAM

These constraints mean that there is a “granularity” of 20 ns (2 % of rev) in the beam OFF state and of 45 ns (4.5 % of rev) in the beam ON state.

Chopper timingChopper timing


24/04/200924/04/2009 1212

What is the amount of timing information that is required for every single machine turn?

For a protocol with a sequence of words [TON , TOFF , TON ,…] , due to the TON - TOFF constraints, the maximum number of words for each revolution of 1000ns would be 30 { (1000ns x 2)/(20+45ns)}. Multiplying this value by the 100 possible turns; we would end up with 3000 words per ring in the worst case.

If a time resolution of 1ns is chosen and the maximum value for the words TON and TOFF is 1000 ns, we end-up with a maximum of 3000 words of 10 bits for each ring.

N.B.: As there no real need for a 1ns time resolution, it might be wise to relax the constraints for the electronic circuit by asking only for a 2ns resolution.

The way the ON-OFF sequence will be digitally represented is to be decided by the designer after the topics has been discussed with a CO specialist.

Chopper operationChopper operation


24/04/200924/04/2009 1313

The ON-OFF sequence of the chopper will be decided by the operation.

The control hardware (ISC: Injection Sequencing Control) will create the Beam ON-OFF windows as required by the operation insuring that the (20 ns < TNO BEAM < 1000 ns) and (45 ns < TBEAM ) conditions are fulfilled.

The programmability of the chopper timing should allow to create many different bunch filling schemes (hollow bunches …)

Note that the chopper amplifier needs a control pulse of 5V on 50 Ω. The control pulse length will correspond to the Kick length (Beam-OFF) including? a time distortion (the output pulse length is not exactly what is requested - less than1 ns) that should be taken into account.

When the distributor is in the head or tail dump position, the chopper is expected to stay in the BEAM-OFF state with the minimum beam duty cycle. This topics is still to be discussed as there might be a request from the Linac4 rf crew to have some beam available before the first injection. This demand comes from the worry that the first Linac bunches might be perturbed by beam loading transients effects in the accelerating chain.

Chopper Chopper operationoperation


24/04/200924/04/2009 1414

Parameter Value

Output voltage ≥ 620 V

Burst length ≤ 1 ms

Burst repetition rate ≤ 10 Hz

Pulse repetition frequency ≤ 15 MHz

Pulse length 20 ns to 1 µs

OFF pulse time ≥ 45ns

Delay of first pulse(equalization possible with a fixed delay line)

73.7 - 76.2 ns

Pulse delay variation within burst [ 1000 pulses, 1 MHz, 300 ns]

≤ 0.4 ns

Pulse delay variation vs temperature[ Tamb 13.5 to 21.0 °C] ≤ 0.3 ns

Pulse length distortion of first pulse(equalization possible by fixed adjustment of the input pulse length)

0.3 - 3.0 ns

Pulse length distortion variation within burst [ 1000 pulses, 1 MHz, 300 ns]

≤ 0.2 ns

Pulse length distortion variation vs temperature [ Tamb 13.5 to 21.0 °C]

0

3% - 90% rise time ≤ 3.6 ns

3% - 90% fall time ≤ 4.3 ns

10% - 90% rise time ≤ 3.6

10% - 90% fall time ≤ 3.4CourtesyMauro Paoluzzi

Chopper operationChopper operation


24/04/200924/04/2009 1515

The ISC: Injection Sequencing Control will receive the reference rf on which all rings are synchronized.

The Beam ON-OFF timing values (including? the negligible time distortion of the chopper amplifier) calculated by an application will take this reference rf to create the Beam ON-OFF sequence.

The application will predict the buckets position and shape assuming the proper value of the rf voltages, h1-h2 phase, initial injection synchro phase, type of frequency law during the capture process and flight time modulation due to the L4 energy modulation.

The application will also take care of the filling-up of the buckets, taking into account the expected distribution, by creating a Linac4 energy modulation signal with its corresponding debuncher phase modulation.

The application will also calculate the distributor timing values to allow having a Beam OFF duration bellow 1000ns as described in slide 10.

The application could also calculate a feed-forward function to be applied to the rf chain.



24/04/200924/04/2009 1616

Beam OFFWindow

Voltage modulation

ΔE Linac, Δφ debuncherTON-OFF Chopper

Rev

BIXi.SDIS

InjectionSequencing

control

Linac rf feed-forward

Application

SourcePre-chopper

+LEBT

45 keV

Distri

180 m

4*rf

Debuncher

Phase modulation

Inj. rf reference (h1 or h2)

Energy modulation

Linac 4

Timing

CO

Inj. RefSource

BIXi.SDIS

BIXi.SInjRF

RF feed-forward

BIXi.SInjChop

Chopper

h21/2

h1

SP2T

BIXi.RF_PHASE

ISCISC


24/04/200924/04/2009 1717

Where should the ISC (Injection Sequencing Control) be located ?

Inputs to the ISC:

1.Register values from CO network2.Start pulse from standard CO modules3.Rev reference from C0 module

Output from ISC:

1.TOFF chopper window to chopper amplifier2.Voltage modulation to last 2 PIM cells3.RF feed-forward4.Phase modulation to debuncher

Linac4 signal(s) interesting for the operation of the Beam control:

1.PU SUM signal (if the Linac4 micro-bunches are still discernible) or fast beam transformers (able to discriminate 20ns pulses)from each of the 4 injection lines (after the distributor but before the ring)

ISCISC


24/04/200924/04/2009 1818

Where should the ISC (Injection Sequencing Control) be located ?

The Beam-OFF signal controlling the chopper is supposed to create a window having a 1 ns precision. Having such a precision requires a fast rise time and/or a very stable threshold level.Considering the possibility of having the ISC far from the chopper, with a possible common mode signal impairing the DC level of the signal and thus the threshold point, it would be convenient to have a 1 ns rise time of the control window.

Such a rise time corresponds to a bandwidth of 1 GHz.A 200 m long Flexwell 3/8 has an attenuation of 17 dB at 1 GHz .The temperature dependence of the cable electrical length is also an issue to be considered

Conclusion:The ISC could well be close to the chopper amplifier where the control network is available. The decision can be left to the team in charge of the development.

SummarySummary


24/04/200924/04/2009 1919

1. The 4 PSB rf will be synchronized at injection to a ppm programmable CO type signal generator (Pentek). This signal will be the reference both for the ISC and for the 4 rf .

2. The BdL correctors will be used to equalize the dipolar field in all rings during each individual capture process

3. The Linac4 energy will be modulated to adapt to the acceleration during the capture process in each ring

4. The debuncher phase will be modulated to adapt to the Linac4 energy modulation

5. The chopper will be activated taking into account the flight time changes due to the Linac4 energy modulation, taking into account the ramping-up frequency during capture, taking into account the painting scheme and taking into account the switching particularities of the chopper amplifier.

6. The Injection Sequencing Control module developed by the rf team will be located at the position they find most convenient.

7. A pick-up sum signal or a fast transformer signal issued from the 4 PSB individual injection lines need to be available for monitoring in the BOR as a diagnostic tool for all the upstream Linac4 system.

Documents

PSB – Linac 4 Synchronization Alfred Blas PSB with Linac 4 Working group meeting 24/04/2009 1 Summary of discussions held with M.E. Angoletta, C. Carli,