Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Provisional data on coverage for the following immunisations: 12 months: DTaP/IPV/Hib 24 months: MMR dose 1 5 years: MMR dose 2
Provisional data, not for release outside the NHS/Public Health Department
CHILDHOOD IMMUNISATION COVERAGEQ2 2014/15
2
Camden had 92% coverage in 12-month olds, which was significantly higher than London (90%), although still short of the WHO 95% target.
14th out of 31 London boroughs.
Context – Camden vs London boroughs, 12 months
Note: Enfield is not included in this analysis as data is not available. City of London is also excluded, due to small numbers of eligible children. Source: PHE, 2015
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Islin
gto
nK
ings
ton
upon
Tha
mes
To
wer
Ham
lets
Bex
ley
Hill
ingd
onM
erto
nS
utto
nLa
mb
eth
Bro
mle
yH
arin
gey
Ric
hmon
d u
pon
Tha
mes
New
ham
Gre
enw
ich
Cam
den
Red
brid
geH
aver
ing
Sou
thw
ark
Bre
ntH
arro
wLe
wis
ham
Cro
ydon
Eal
ing
Bar
king
an
d D
age
nham
Wan
dsw
orth
Hou
nslo
wW
alth
am F
ores
tH
ackn
eyH
amm
ersm
ith a
nd F
ulha
mK
ensi
ngto
n an
d C
hels
eaB
arne
tW
estm
inst
er
Per
cen
tag
e
Local Authority
DTaP/IPV/Hib coverage in children aged 12 months, London Local Authorities, London and England, Q2 2014/15
London England
3
Camden had 85% coverage in 24-month olds, which was significantly lower than the national average (92%).
Context – Camden vs London boroughs, 24 months
Note: Enfield is not included in this analysis as data is not available. City of London is also excluded, due to small numbers of eligible children. Source: PHE, 2015
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Islin
gto
nT
ow
er H
amle
tsB
exle
yN
ewha
mH
illin
gdon
Lam
bet
hG
reen
wic
hB
rom
ley
Hac
kney
Sou
thw
ark
Kin
gsto
n up
on T
ham
esH
arin
gey
Sut
ton
Mer
ton
Hou
nslo
wB
rent
Lew
isha
mB
arki
ng a
nd
Dag
enh
amR
ichm
ond
upo
n T
ham
esH
aver
ing
Red
brid
geC
royd
onC
amde
nW
ands
wor
thW
alth
am F
ores
tE
alin
gH
amm
ersm
ith a
nd F
ulha
mW
estm
inst
erK
ensi
ngto
n an
d C
hels
eaB
arne
t
Per
cen
tag
e
Local Authority
MMR coverage in children aged 24 months, London Local Authorities, London and England, Q2 2014/15
London England
4
Camden had 82% coverage in five-year olds, which was significantly lower than the national average (89%).
Context – Camden vs London boroughs, 5 year
Note: Enfield is not included in this analysis as data is not available. City of London is also excluded, due to small numbers of eligible children. Source: PHE, 2015
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Islin
gto
nT
ow
er H
amle
tsLa
mb
eth
Hac
kney
Gre
enw
ich
Sou
thw
ark
Kin
gsto
n up
on T
ham
esB
exle
yB
rom
ley
Har
row
Hill
ingd
onN
ewha
mH
arin
gey
Hav
erin
gB
rent
Bar
king
an
d D
age
nham
Cam
den
Sut
ton
Eal
ing
Mer
ton
Wal
tham
For
est
Wan
dsw
orth
Ric
hmon
d u
pon
Tha
mes
Cro
ydon
Hou
nslo
wLe
wis
ham
Red
brid
geH
amm
ersm
ith a
nd F
ulha
mB
arne
tK
ensi
ngto
n an
d C
hels
eaW
estm
inst
er
Per
cen
tag
e
Local Authority
MMR 2 coverage in children aged 5 years, London Local Authorities, London and England, Q2 2014/15
London England
5
Coverage in one-year old children ranged from 93% to 100% among GP practices in West locality.
None of the GP practices in West locality had significantly lower coverage than the WHO target (95%).
DTaP/IPV/Hib coverage in children aged 12 months
Note: Red bars indicate a coverage lower than the WHO target and blue bars indicate a coverage no different to the WHO target. Bedford Square Medical Centre and Plender Street in South Camden are now closed and are not included in this analysis. Source: PHE, 2015
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Bro
okfie
ld P
ark
Par
liam
ent H
illD
aleh
am
Ga
rden
sP
rimro
se H
illH
amps
tead
Ade
laid
e M
CP
rince
of W
ales
Par
k E
ndK
eats
Gro
upC
aver
sham
Fo
ur T
rees
Sw
iss
Cot
tage
Ros
slyn
Hill
Gow
er S
tree
tR
egen
ts P
ark
Gra
ys In
nG
ower
Pla
ceB
runs
wic
k M
CH
olbo
rn M
CS
t Phi
lips
MC
Mat
thew
man
Jam
es W
igg
Blo
omsb
ury
Que
ens
Cre
scen
tM
useu
m P
ract
ice
Am
pthi
ll S
q. M
CS
omer
s T
own
MC
Kin
gs C
ross
Roa
dW
est E
nd L
ane
Fo
rtun
e G
reen
Wes
tfie
ld M
CB
elsi
ze P
riory
Abb
ey P
ract
ice
Bro
ndes
bury
MC
Chl
omle
y G
arde
ns
MC
Wes
t Ham
pste
ad
North South West
Per
cen
tag
e
Locality and GP practice
DTaP/IPV/Hib coverage in children aged 12 months, by locality and GP practice, Camden, Q2 2014/15 WHO target
6
In total there was only one child aged 12 months needed to be immunised to meet the 95% target in Q2 2014/15 in West locality.
How many children aged 12 months needed to be immunised to meet 95% WHO target?
Note: Bedford Square Medical Centre and Plender Street in South Camden are now closed and are not included in this analysis. Source: PHE, 2015
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Sw
iss
Cot
tage
Cav
ersh
amK
eats
Gro
upF
our
Tre
esR
ossl
yn H
illP
ark
End
Prim
rose
Hill
Ham
pste
adP
rince
of W
ales
Ade
laid
e M
CB
rook
field
Par
kP
arlia
men
t Hill
Dal
eha
m G
ard
ens
Som
ers
Tow
n M
CA
mpt
hill
Sq.
MC
Kin
gs C
ross
Roa
dJa
mes
Wig
gM
useu
m P
ract
ice
Gow
er S
tree
tR
egen
ts P
ark
Gra
ys In
nG
ower
Pla
ceB
loom
sbur
yB
runs
wic
k M
CH
olbo
rn M
CQ
ueen
s C
resc
ent
St P
hilip
s M
CM
atth
ewm
anW
est H
amps
tea
dA
bbey
Pra
ctic
eW
est E
nd L
ane
Fo
rtun
e G
reen
Bro
ndes
bury
MC
Wes
tfie
ld M
CC
hlom
ley
Gar
den
s M
CB
elsi
ze P
riory
North South West
Nu
mb
er o
f ch
ild
ren
Locality and GP practice
Additional number of children that need to be immunised to bring coverage of DTaP/IPV/Hib in children aged 12 months up to the WHO target, by locality and GP practice, Camden, Q2 2014/15
7
MMR coverage among two-year old children ranged from 60% to 100% among GP practices in West locality.
Two GP practices in West locality had significantly lower coverage than the WHO target (95%).
MMR coverage in children aged 24 months
Note: Red bars indicate a coverage lower than the WHO target and blue bars indicate a coverage no different to the WHO target. St Philips Medical Centre in South Camden has not submitted the data and is not included in this analysis. Bedford Square Medical Centre and Plender Street in South Camden are now closed and are excluded from this analysis. Source: PHE, 2015
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Fo
ur T
rees
Ros
slyn
Hill
Prin
ce o
f Wal
esP
ark
End
Ade
laid
e M
CH
amps
tead
Sw
iss
Cot
tage
Prim
rose
Hill
Dal
eha
m G
ard
ens
Kea
ts G
roup
Par
liam
ent H
illC
aver
sham
Bro
okfie
ld P
ark
Gow
er S
tree
tG
rays
Inn
Gow
er P
lace
Blo
omsb
ury
Bru
nsw
ick
MC
Mus
eum
Pra
ctic
eM
atth
ewm
anH
olbo
rn M
CJa
mes
Wig
gR
egen
ts P
ark
Que
ens
Cre
scen
tA
mpt
hill
Sq.
MC
Som
ers
Tow
n M
CK
ings
Cro
ss R
oad
Wes
t End
Lan
eB
rond
esbu
ry M
CA
bbey
Pra
ctic
eW
est H
amps
tea
dF
ort
une
Gre
enC
hlom
ley
Gar
den
s M
CB
elsi
ze P
riory
Wes
tfie
ld M
C
North South West
Per
cen
tag
e
Locality and GP practice
MMR coverage in children aged 24 months, by locality and GP practice, Camden, Q2 2014/15 WHO target
8
In total there were 12 children aged 24 months needed to be immunised to meet the 95% target in Q2 2014/15 in West locality.
Most of the practices in West locality below the 95% target were between 1 and 4 children away from meeting it.
How many children aged 24 months needed to be immunised to meet WHO target?
Note: St Philips Medical Centre in South Camden has not submitted the data and is not included in this analysis. Bedford Square Medical Centre and Plender Street in South Camden are now closed and are excluded from this analysis. Source: PHE, 2015
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Cav
ersh
amB
rook
field
Par
kS
wis
s C
otta
geP
rimro
se H
illH
amps
tead
Par
liam
ent H
illK
eats
Gro
upA
dela
ide
MC
Dal
eha
m G
ard
ens
Par
k E
ndP
rince
of W
ales
Fo
ur T
rees
Ros
slyn
Hill
Am
pthi
ll S
q. M
CJa
mes
Wig
gS
omer
s T
own
MC
Que
ens
Cre
scen
tK
ings
Cro
ss R
oad
Gow
er S
tree
tR
egen
ts P
ark
Gra
ys In
nG
ower
Pla
ceB
loom
sbur
yB
runs
wic
k M
CH
olbo
rn M
CM
useu
m P
ract
ice
Mat
thew
man
Bel
size
Prio
ryW
est H
amps
tea
dW
estfi
eld
MC
Abb
ey P
ract
ice
Fo
rtun
e G
reen
Bro
ndes
bury
MC
Chl
omle
y G
arde
ns
MC
Wes
t End
Lan
e
North South West
Nu
mb
er o
f ch
ild
ren
Locality and GP practice
Additional number of children that need to be immunised to bring coverage of MMR in children aged 24 months up to the WHO target,
by locality and GP practice, Camden, Q2 2014/15
9
MMR2 coverage among five-year old children ranged from 50% to 100% among GP practices in West locality.
Three GP practices in West locality had significantly lower coverage than the WHO target (95%).
MMR 2 coverage in children aged 5 years
Note: Red bars indicate a coverage lower than the WHO target and blue bars indicate a coverage no different to the WHO target. St Philips Medical Centre in South Camden has not submitted the data and is not included in this analysis. Bedford Square Medical Centre and Plender Street in South Camden are now closed and are excluded from this analysis. Source: PHE, 2015
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Bro
okfie
ld P
ark
Dal
eha
m G
ard
ens
Ros
slyn
Hill
Ade
laid
e M
CP
ark
End
Prin
ce o
f Wal
esK
eats
Gro
upC
aver
sham
Ham
pste
adS
wis
s C
otta
geF
our
Tre
esP
arlia
men
t Hill
Prim
rose
Hill
Gow
er S
tree
tB
loom
sbur
yB
runs
wic
k M
CH
olbo
rn M
CM
atth
ewm
anQ
ueen
s C
resc
ent
Reg
ents
Par
kA
mpt
hill
Sq.
MC
Jam
es W
igg
Gra
ys In
nM
useu
m P
ract
ice
Som
ers
Tow
n M
CG
ower
Pla
ceK
ings
Cro
ss R
oad
Wes
t End
Lan
eF
ort
une
Gre
enB
rond
esbu
ry M
CC
hlom
ley
Gar
den
s M
CB
elsi
ze P
riory
Abb
ey P
ract
ice
Wes
t Ham
pste
ad
Wes
tfie
ld M
C
North South West
Per
cen
tag
e
Locality and GP practice
MMR 2 coverage in children aged 5 years, by locality and GP practice, Camden, Q2 2014/15 WHO target
10
In total there were 13 children aged 5 years needed to be immunised to meet the 95% target in Q2 2014/15 in West locality.
The four practices below the 95% target were between 1 and 6 children away from meeting it.
How many children aged 5 years needed to be immunised to meet WHO target?
Note: St Philips Medical Centre in South Camden has not submitted the data and is not included in this analysis. Bedford Square Medical Centre and Plender Street in South Camden are now closed and are excluded from this analysis. Source: PHE, 2015
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Kea
ts G
roup
Sw
iss
Cot
tage
Ham
pste
adC
aver
sham
Prim
rose
Hill
Par
liam
ent H
illF
our
Tre
esP
ark
End
Prin
ce o
f Wal
esA
dela
ide
MC
Bro
okfie
ld P
ark
Dal
eha
m G
ard
ens
Ros
slyn
Hill
Jam
es W
igg
Som
ers
Tow
n M
CA
mpt
hill
Sq.
MC
Reg
ents
Par
kG
rays
Inn
Mus
eum
Pra
ctic
eG
ower
Pla
ceQ
ueen
s C
resc
ent
Kin
gs C
ross
Roa
dG
ower
Str
eet
Blo
omsb
ury
Bru
nsw
ick
MC
Hol
born
MC
Mat
thew
man
Wes
t Ham
pste
ad
Abb
ey P
ract
ice
Wes
tfie
ld M
CB
elsi
ze P
riory
Wes
t End
Lan
eF
ort
une
Gre
enB
rond
esbu
ry M
CC
hlom
ley
Gar
den
s M
C
North South West
Nu
mb
er o
f ch
ild
ren
Locality and GP practice
Additional number of children that need to be immunised to bring coverage of MMR 2 in children aged 5 years up to the WHO target,
by locality and GP practice, Camden, Q2 2014/15
11
How many children needed to be immunised? Q4 2013/14 to Q2 2014/15 combined, West locality
Note: The percentages are the additional number of children needed to immunised to bring coverage up to the 95% target split by whether the practices missed the target continuously or not, as proportion to the additional number of whole children needed. Practices that did not submit the data for any of the three quarters are not included in this analysis.
Number % Number %
12 months 0 19 0 0% 19 100%
24 months 1 32 14 44% 18 56%
5 years 2 50 23 46% 27 54%
Additional number of children needed to immunised
Practices that missed all three
targetsOther practices
Age of children
Number of practices missed WHO 95% target for all the three quarters
Total additional number of children
needed to be immunised to bring coverage up to the
95% target
12
Camden has low coverage in childhood immunisations compared to London and England, particularly for vaccinations in older children (two and five year olds).
There is considerable variation in immunisation uptake between GP practices within Camden, particularly in older children. In Q2 2014/15 3 GP practices in West locality achieved 95% coverage for MMR2 in 5 year olds. However, 3 practices were significantly below the WHO target and all of those were also significantly below target in the previous quarter.
Further work is needed to improve uptake of immunisations to reach WHO recommended coverage levels (95%).
The findings from the previous quarters suggest everyone can do more, and only a small additional number of children vaccinated would result in a noticeable rise in coverage.
Focus needs to be on improving the accessibility and reach of the immunisation programme, as well as to improve data recording, reporting and monitoring.
Key messages
THANK YOU
For any questions about the childhood immunisation coverage data, please contact us at:
13
