Upload
julianna-logan
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Providing Technical Assistance to Metal Finishers using Trichloroethylene (TCE): Outcomes and Next Steps
Linda Darveau & Valerie Rickman
Picture courtesy of Roy Crystal
Project Background
Air sampling in the Providence, RI area revealed presence of TCE in the air.
EPA received complaints from the RI DEM that many metal finishers/polishing shops were out of compliance with air regulations because of TCE use.
RI DEM has documented non compliance and is beginning to issue NOV’s, but doesn’t have the resources to pursue all.
Initial Problems
RI Industry has two complicated standards to comply with:
- The RI Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 36,
- EPA’s MACT Standard for Halogenated Solvents
Conducting workshops & traditional outreach not effective with small shops.
Degreaser at R & R Polishing Co.
Picture courtesy of Valerie Rickman
Initial Steps
Started workgroup including RI DEM, RI Dept. Health, Narragansett Bay Commission, TURI
Contacted individual metal finishers and performed site visits
– Initial effort found 9 facilities interested in alternative solutions to TCE
Contracted with TURI to test metal parts to find effective alternative cleaner
EPA scheduled 1 workshop to allow TURI to demonstrate their testing procedures on metal parts
Picture courtesy of Valerie Rickman
About TURI
Mission:– Research, test and promote alternatives to toxic chemicals used in
Massachusetts industries and communities – Provide resources and tools for a safer place to live and work – Promote economic competitiveness through improved efficiency,
compliancy stability and reduced risk
The Surface Solutions Laboratory and the CleanerSolutions Database
– Specializes in finding safer alternatives to hazardous chemicals.– Available at http://www.cleanersolutions.org
Ira Green - Background
270 employees - Products consist of metal pieces for the DoD
– Military unaware of TCE use in metal finishing operations
Used 12,500 pounds of TCE in 2004 When EPA contacted Ira Green, the company was
very close to exceeding permit limitations Already had enforcement action against them by the
RI DEM 2003 and 2004
Images from http://www.iragreen.com
Ira Green – Finding an Alternative
EPA collected parts for TURI to test Set up a test tank in Ira Green’s facility
– Determined that alternative solution works as well as TCE
– TURI provided free gallon of alternative solution IRA Green currently using alternative in
existing ultrasonic tanks for 30% of product, using n propyl bromide as a drop in replacement while waiting to purchase additional ultrasonic equipment.
Three A’s - Background
Small, family-owned job shop – 4 employees
Owner wanted to stop using TCE because of associated health risks
Used approximately 55
gallons (~690 pounds)/year at a cost of about $1000 Pictures courtesy of Jason Marshall, TURI
Three A’s – Finding an Alternative
EPA collected parts for TURI to test Needed to find an alternative process that
would maintain an antique finish on metal parts
An alternative was found that will allow Three A’s to retrofit current degreaser with an immersible transducer, saving money on equipment costs.
Next Steps
Continue site visits to assist shops who want to participate
Explore additional barriers to switching to alternatives such as drying issues, water discharge
Intern, Valerie Rickman, is working on a “How to” guide for metal finishers who would like to find an alternative to using TCE
Investigate whether problem exists in other cities such as Holyoke
Picture courtesy of Valerie Rickman