Proton:from Saga to Exora

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Case Study ICS

Citation preview

  • 5/25/2018 Proton:from Saga to Exora

    1/11

    1

    Question 1: From a financial analysis perspective, has the Proton management done a

    good job?

    Liquidity Ratio

    2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Current Ratio

    [Current

    Asset /

    Current

    Liabilities]

    5,026.5 /

    2,210

    = 2.27

    4,431 /

    2,341.1

    = 1.89

    3,165.5 /

    1,533.8

    = 2.06

    3,446.1 /

    1,639.2

    = 2.10

    3,404.6 /

    1,883.6

    = 1.81

    Quick Ratio

    [(Current

    Asset

    Inventories) /

    Current

    Liabilities]

    4,059.4 /

    2,210

    = 1.84

    3,042 /

    2,341.1

    = 1.30

    1,891.9 /

    1,533.8

    = 1.23

    2,345.8 /

    1,639.2

    = 1.43

    2,009.5 /

    1,883.6

    = 1.07

    Liquidity ratio shows the ability of the company to repay its short term liabilities. It

    can be seen that Proton has current and quick ratio above 1.0 which means that Proton is

    having enough money to repay its short term debt. However, the current ratio was rapidly

    decrease by 0.47 from 2005 to 2009. For quick ratio, it can be seen that the ratio in 2009 haddecrease to 1.07 compared to 1.85 in 2005. It shows that Proton is not strong in their finance

    and affects the ability to pay the debt with the cash assets. As a conclusion, Proton has quite

    poor performance in term of its liquidity during 2009.

    Profitability Ratio

    2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Net Profit

    Margin [Profit

    after tax /

    Revenue]

    442.4 /

    8,483.3

    = 5.215%

    46.7 /

    7,796.9

    = 0.599%

    (589.5) /

    4,687.3

    =(12.577)%

    184.6 /

    5,621.6

    = 3.284%

    (301.8) /

    6,486.6

    = (4.653)%

    Return on

    Equity [Profit

    after tax / Total

    Equity]

    442.4 /

    5,860.2

    = 7.549%

    46.7 /

    5,870.6

    = 0.795%

    (589.5) /

    5,230.6

    = (11.270)%

    184.6 /

    5,421.2

    = 3.405%

    (301.8) /

    5,101.6

    = (5.916)%

    Return on

    Assets [Profit

    after tax / Totalasset]

    442.4 /

    8,830.9

    = 5.010%

    46.7 /

    8,312.8

    = 0.562%

    (589.5) /

    6,946.8

    = (8.486)%

    184.6 /

    7,293.3

    = 2.531%

    (301.8) /

    7,098.9

    = (4.251)%

  • 5/25/2018 Proton:from Saga to Exora

    2/11

    2

    Profitabiliy ratio measures the companys ability to generate profit relative to sales,

    assets and equity. This ratio highlight the effectiveness of companys profitability is being

    managed. Through out the ratio analysis of Proton, it shows that in 2009, Proton was unable

    to generate profit due to sales, assets and equity because its ratio shows negative percentage.

    However, in 2007, those profitability ratio of Proton also showed negative percentage. And it

    is clearly shown that Proton has performed well in term of profitability in 2005 due to the

    highest ratio compared to the other years. In conclusion, it can be seen that the profitability of

    Proton is fluctuating from year to year and for 2009, the profitability of Proton is quite low

    compared to 2005 or even with the previous year 2008.

    Activity Ratio

    2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Average Time

    Collection

    [Receivables /

    Sales x 365

    days]

    1,403.2 /

    8,483.3 x

    365 days

    = 60.37

    1,244 /

    7,796.9 x

    365 days

    = 58.24

    1,192 /

    4,687.3 x

    365 days

    = 92.82

    1,099 /

    5,621.6 x

    365 days

    = 71.36

    1,080.3 /

    6,486.6 x

    365 days

    = 60.79

    Inventories

    Turnover

    [Sales /

    Inventories]

    8,483.3 /

    967.1

    = 8.77

    7,796.9 /

    1,389

    = 5.61

    4,687.3 /

    1,273.6

    = 3.68

    5,621.6 /

    1,100.3

    = 5.11

    6,486.6 /

    1,395.1

    = 4.65

    Total Asset

    Turnover

    [Sales / Total

    Asset]

    8,483.3 /

    8,830.9

    = 0.96

    7,796.9 /

    8,312.8

    = 0.94

    4,687.3 /

    6,946.8

    = 0.67

    5,621.6 /

    7,293.3

    = 0.77

    6,486.6 /

    7,098.9

    = 0.91

    Fixed Asset

    Turnover

    [Sales / Fixed

    Asset]

    8,483.3 /

    3,288.9

    = 2.58

    7,796.9 /

    3,302.9

    = 2.36

    4,687.3 /

    3,169.5

    = 1.48

    5,621.6 /

    3,150.4

    = 1.78

    6,486.6 /

    2,827.1

    = 2.29

    Activity ratio determines the ability of a company to convert its balance sheet items

    intorevenue.In addition to expressing how well a company generates revenue, activity ratios

    also indicate how well the company is being managed. In term of collection period, Proton

    was quite slow in getting payment from its clients. The fastest Proton can make collection is

    around two months and in 2007, the average collection is delayed up to three months. In term

    of managing its inventories and fixed assets, Proton was quite well in managing and investing

    them based on the ratio analysis above.

    http://www.investinganswers.com/financial-dictionary/businesses-corporations/revenue-5108http://www.investinganswers.com/financial-dictionary/businesses-corporations/revenue-5108
  • 5/25/2018 Proton:from Saga to Exora

    3/11

    3

    Financial Leverage Ratio

    2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

    Debt-to-Equity

    ratio [Total

    Liabilities /

    Total Equity &

    Liabilities]

    2,970.7 /

    8,830.9

    = 0.336

    2,442.2 /

    8,312.8

    = 0.294

    1,716.2 /

    6,946.8

    = 0.247

    1,872.1 /

    7,293.3

    = 0.257

    1,997.3 /

    7,098.9

    = 0.281

    Leverage ratio

    [Total

    Liabilities /

    Total equity]

    2,970.7 /

    5,860.2

    = 0.507

    2,442.2 /

    5,870.6

    = 0.416

    1,716.2 /

    5,230.6

    = 0.328

    1,872.1 /

    5,421.2

    = 0.345

    1,997.3 /

    5,101.6

    = 0.392

    The financial leverage ratio is used to determine about the companies financing

    methods, or the ability to meet the obligations. For debt-to-equity ratio, Proton shows

    increasing ratio from 2007 to 2009 which means that it is being financed by creditors rather

    than itw own financial sources. However, the ratio is still below 1.0 which indicates that the

    investors have low risk in getting their return. In conclusion, Proton can be considered as less

    risky for investors to invest in this company due to lower financial leverage ratio.

    As a conclusion, management of Proton has done a good job in managing the

    company fixed assets as well as retaining the investors investment. However, in term of

    ensuring the liquidity and constant profitability of the company as well as managing its

    inventories and receivables, the management need to put more concerned towards it.

  • 5/25/2018 Proton:from Saga to Exora

    4/11

    4

    Question 2: What characteristics should a foreign partner have that will enable

    maximum synergies?

    At the moment, Proton is seen do not has adequate resources in order for them to stand by

    itself. In other words, Proton needs other company either to join or cooperate in order to

    produce the products. However, to ensure the collaboration or partnership taken place will be

    successful and benefit Proton especially; the foreign company must have several good

    characteristics or qualities. Below are several characteristics that the foreign partner should

    have to enable Proton maximizing its synergies:

    Technology advancement or expertise:

    Technology is one of the major factors to determine success in automotive industry.

    This is because, consumer always aim that the best technology is capable in producing a good

    quality product. As known, technologies in this global world are changing rapidly and

    advancing too fast which Proton was not able to catch up with the advancement. As a result,

    Proton may have the possibility to collapse or shut down due to the very high competition in

    the automobile industry. From our view point, it is clearly show that other automotive

    companies are very efficient in upgrading their technologies. They are fast forward and

    understand well their consumers preference and always improve their products from time totime. Most company that well established are from Japan especially; Honda, Mazda, Suzuki

    and others. However, there is no doubt that Hyundai is one of the companies that able to move

    forward and become the main competitor towards those companies. In conclusion, if Proton

    wants to have partnership or collaboration with foreign companies, the company should be

    advanced in technology. This is to guarantee that they can give a good example, consultation

    and information and also the technology can be adapted by Proton for their future benefits.

    Good marketing effort and experience:

    Apart from technology advancement, the partner for Proton should also have a good

    marketing background as well as experiences. Marketing is quite vital because a good

    marketing effort and experiences can ensure the products can be distributed worldwide.

    Marketing effort have to be done continuously even the company had already well known or

    well established. This is to constantly remind the consumer about the existence of the

    companys brand name due to intense competition nowadays. Hence, Proton should make

  • 5/25/2018 Proton:from Saga to Exora

    5/11

    5

    collaboration with foreign company which had good marketing effort and experience in order

    to maximize Protons sales.

    Production efficiency:

    Another important characteristic of the foreign company should have is in term of

    production efficiency. It is a must to ensure quality of the products and to minimize the costs

    of production. This is because; the costs incurred are very high in producing the automobiles.

    Due to that reason, Proton needs to collaborate with a company that is highly efficient in term

    of production in order to minimize the overall costs at the same time will maximize the

    customers satisfaction.

    Able to adapt with local culture and norms:

    As we know that every countries has their own cultures and norms. Even different

    state in the same country might have different cultures with other states. Cultures and norms

    are not absolute but relative; there is no right or wrong. Due to that, it should be respected by

    others from different countries and places. Foreign people should place their respects towards

    local cultures and norms. It is true that Proton really need the partnership and collaboration

    with foreign company. However, the aspects of cultures and norms should not be regarded

    because it will affect the company as whole. Proton has to be firm in maintaining its cultures

    and norms even their partner come from foreign company. And also, Proton should respect

    their partners cultures and norms too. Thus, Proton should make some research background

    of the partners cultures and norms to avoid any unnecessary deeds which will affect the

    collaboration and also the company itself.

    Financial investment:

    Last but not least, one of the reasons for collaboration is to share the capital injection.

    So, Proton should find partner or make collaboration with a company that already have strong

    and stable financial position. This is because, when the partner has strong financial position, it

    can help Proton in term of capital. In other words, Proton will indirectly have larger capital in

    short period and they can fully utilize the capital for the benefits of the company in long term.

  • 5/25/2018 Proton:from Saga to Exora

    6/11

    6

    Question 3: What broad considerations should determine the parts of Proton that are

    worth keeping and developing and the matter of operations to be relocated or closed

    down?

    The consideration in the part of Proton that are worth keeping and developing should be

    determined based on the SWOT analysis. SWOT analysis is very importance in each

    company because analysis can help to identify and understand key issues affecting the

    business. A SWOT analysis assist in understand the business better, address the weaknesses

    of the business, deter threat, capitalize the opportunities, take advantage of the business

    strengths and develop business goals and strategies for achieving them.

    Strengths

    Protons strength lies on its price competitive product. Proton has a broad distribution

    network over the countrywide that would help the company to step forward with the support

    from Malaysian government. In addition, company also has a good corporate governance and

    have a strong bargaining power over the buyer since the Proton is the national car maker. It

    was highly supported by the Malaysians as they use their own car national car product.

    Weaknesses

    Since the history of the proton from it establishment was a short experience in car making but

    it not an excuse for the Proton to come out with low quality compared to the history of Toyota

    that started in 1933, having a lot of experience in car making. Due to the short in experience,

    this could cost Proton very high in producing the best car with high quality, but then it might

    jeopardize the Protons reputation. The important thing in car making was product

    performance and functionality. Thus, the quality of the product needs to be monitored and

    assured constantly to the customers. Other than that, operational cost and other expenses is

    always a challenge to any industry and for the case of PROTON, it is more vulnerable to

    increase raw material cost such as steel particularly.

    Opportunities

    The demand for cars in any segment is always there, except for more trying times like during

    economic crisis. There are always opportunities for PROTON to be a global player. Nobody

    ever say that cars should only be manufactured by Japan, Germany and other western

    countries though of course these countries have the reputation of making good cars long

  • 5/25/2018 Proton:from Saga to Exora

    7/11

    7

    before PROTON and Malaysia comes into the picture. Collaborations within industry players

    could enable PROTON to do many things. Through research and development more

    innovative products could be invented and ensure that PROTON as a brand name remains in

    the industry.

    Threats

    One of the threats is of course from the rivals, the competitors in the automotive industry.

    Even Perusahaan Otomotif Kedua (PERODUA) Malaysian second national car maker, set

    up after PROTON started to challenge PROTONs market share in Malaysia. Perodua

    actually did better in recent year and outperformed PROTON via their most well selling

    model so far, MyVi and grab more than 30% of overall market share. Under policy like

    AFTA (ASEAN Free Trade Area) consumers can have more choices form HONDA, Toyota,

    Chevrolet and others brand to be selected at a more affordable price, as Malaysia now has cut

    duties on imports from other Southeast Asian countries to less than five percent. On the basis

    of a SWOT analysis above, PROTON is no need to close or move part of PROTON as it is an

    icon for Malaysia to be proud of and will be a milestone in the future. Apart from that also is

    allowing them to increase job opportunities in the field and the most important automotive

    PROTON support from the government.

    Question 4: From a review of the 2009 National Automative Policy, are there areas of

    possible collaboration with Proton in the event of short of a full merger/takeover?

    Proton should collaborate with local manufacturer in order to maintain the strength of the

    company and thus can compete with the foreign company. Currently there are only two

    companies in the country, Proton and Perodua. According to Proton MD, Datuk Syed Zainal

    stated that consolidation would be the most logical step to pursue the national car agenda. In

    addition, with the stand-alone of Proton, it would diverse structure of the industry, with the

    production centers and vendors scatter throughout the country which led to inefficiencies and

    higher cost to the company. By having collaboration, these matter would be settled by

    reducing the cost of production to the company. Several new policies and measures, covering

    licensing, duties, incentives, technology, environment, safety, standards and regulations are

    being introduced under the NAP review, with the aim of fostering a more competitive

    industry and freer market. The new policies and measures under the NAP Review are

  • 5/25/2018 Proton:from Saga to Exora

    8/11

    8

    expected to provide significant contribution to the overall growth of the industry and the

    country. Emphasis will be given in attracting investments in high value-added manufacturing

    activities using latest and high technology. So this measure was to promote the local long-

    term development goal of becoming a regional R&D and manufacturing hub. In addition, by

    having NAP, it ensures orderly development as well as long term competitiveness and

    capability of the domestic automotive industry as a result of market liberalization. It enhances

    the competitiveness of the national car manufacturer through strategic partnership and foster

    the development of the latest, more sophisticated technology in the domestic automotive

    industry. Indirectly, it would enhance Bumiputera participation in the domestic automotive

    industry and improve safety standards for consumers and promote environment-friendly

    opportunities.

    For the National Automotive Policy on the full liberalisation of local assembled luxury

    passenger vehicles, a foreign firms could freely acquire a manufacturing license and hold a

    100% stake in a company to assemble passenger vehicles provided they fulfilled certain

    conditions. From this policy, PROTON which focusing primarily on the lower-end market

    were benefited and this can become the area where collaboration is important where

    PROTON can acquire high-end technology from foreign companies in producing small and

    compact cars. Collaboration with long established companies which have reputation inproducing compact cars are vital to make sure an increas in PROTON market shares on the

    lower-end market.

    Incentives for manufacturers of critical and high value-added part components were

    given. This policy was introduced to promote the local long-term development goal of

    becoming a regional R&D and manufacturing hub. Collaboration with other companies which

    hold more advanced technology in manufacturing high value-added part components are

    importantn to ensure the transfer of technology to PROTON. With the current capabilities of

    PROTON manufacturing plant, it was quite difficult for PROTON to manufacture part

    components by itself, thus collaboration with PROTON in this area could ensure the transfer

    of technology to PROTON and also at the same time enjoy the incentives.

    Proton intention to establish a strategic partnership with global OEMs to enhance its

    global competitiveness for long-term viability is a good platform for collaboration with other

    companies. This area provides the possibiilty for Proton to increase its technological prowess

    in exchange for a gateway to the ASEAN region, an advanced R&D platform and ample

  • 5/25/2018 Proton:from Saga to Exora

    9/11

    9

    production capacity. Grabbing this opportunities will ensure a win-win situation where Proton

    could also benefit from the collaboration and foreing companies could penetrate into

    Malaysian automotive industry with a competitive price and technology.

    Question 5: What other information not included in the case could help consultant

    Saiful Alawi makes a more meaningful recommendation? Why?

    As a consultant, Chartered Accountant, Saiful Alawi has to prepare a Projected Budgeting to

    review Proton and to recommend whether an investment and/or collaboration should be

    considered. There are few information in this case that are not included. These are:

    1. Current Market Situation

    Economy

    There were about 806 million cars and light trucks on the road in 2007, consuming over 260

    billion US gallons (980,000,000 m3) of gasoline and diesel fuel yearly. The automobile is a

    primary mode of transportation for many developed economies. The Detroit branch of Boston

    Consulting Group predicts that, by 2014, one-third of world demand will be in the four BRIC

    markets (Brazil, Russia, India and China). Other potentially powerful automotive markets are

    Iran and Indonesia. Emerging auto markets already buy more cars than established markets.

    According to a J.D. Power study, emerging markets accounted for 51 percent of the global

    light-vehicle sales in 2010. The study expects this trend to accelerate.

    2. Item in Income Statement (internal information)

    Income statement is a statement showing all the income and expenses in order to produce a

    companys net profit and income attributable to shareholders. However, the income statement

    of PROTON from year 2005 until 2009 does not show a lot of cost and expenses incurred. All

    the items below are items that should be included in the income statement but they are not

    revealed in the income statement of Proton.

    Cost of Sales Other operating income Distribution costs Administrative expenses

  • 5/25/2018 Proton:from Saga to Exora

    10/11

    10

    Other operating expenses Finance cost Share of results associated companies

    Share of results of jointly controlled entities Research and Development Cost Interest charges

    The values of above items are very important to determine, influence and help Saiful Alawi to

    make a reasonable, rationale and correct judgment. For example cost of sales. Cost of sales is

    being used to determine ratio of inventory turnover. Inventory turnover ratio is a ratio that

    measures a companys ability to sell its products or convert its inventory into cash in a year.

    By knowing this ratio, Saiful Alawi will know how efficient Proton in planning its productionand sales to ensure that there is a balance between them to avoid inventory that is kept too

    long.

    3. Research and Development (R&D)

    Next is Research and Development Cost. PROTON has been given a huge amount of

    allocation from Government to do research and development and they are always doing it in

    order to improve the quality of their product. By right, amount of research and development

    should be reported in the income statement. The value will help Saiful alawi to decide

    whether or not PROTON has done a good research by comparing to the cost of research and

    the result or outcome from the research.

    4. SWOT Analysis of Proton and its competitor

    SWOT Analysis is an analysis that consists of a companys strength, weakness, opportunity

    and threat. The analysis will help company to discover their own strength and weakness and

    opportunity and threat that they are facing from outside. This analysis should be revealed

    because from the analysis, Saiful Alawi will have a broad mind of PROTON and also manage

    to decide the crossroads of PROTON in a long run as well. Besides SWOT Analysis of

    Proton, other information that should be included is lists of its competitors and their SWOT

    Analysis. This information is very useful to Saiful Alawi so that he manages to make a

    comparison and able to know where PROTON stand compare to its competitors and discover

    weaknesses of PROTON better.

  • 5/25/2018 Proton:from Saga to Exora

    11/11

    11

    5. PROTONs corporate information

    In order for Saiful Alawi to evaluate PROTON, he needs the companys corporate

    information. The corporate information includes:

    Companys vision and mission Internal and external environment of the company Short term and long term objectives Strategies-strategies that have been implemented by the company to achieve goals