30
Engineering Conferences International ECI Digital Archives Single-use Technologies II: Bridging Polymer Science to Biotechnology Applications Proceedings 5-9-2017 Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on surfaces Dan Nicolau McGill University, Canada, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: hp://dc.engconfintl.org/biopoly_ii Part of the Materials Science and Engineering Commons is Abstract and Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Proceedings at ECI Digital Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in Single-use Technologies II: Bridging Polymer Science to Biotechnology Applications by an authorized administrator of ECI Digital Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Dan Nicolau, "Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on surfaces" in "Single-use Technologies II: Bridging Polymer Science to Biotechnology Applications", kta Mahajan (Genentech, Inc., USA) Gary Lye (University College London, UK) Regine Eibl-Schindler (Zurich University of Applied Science, Switzerland) Eds, ECI Symposium Series, (2017). hp://dc.engconfintl.org/ biopoly_ii/46

Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Engineering Conferences InternationalECI Digital ArchivesSingle-use Technologies II: Bridging PolymerScience to Biotechnology Applications Proceedings

5-9-2017

Protein-specific empirical model of proteinadsorption on surfacesDan NicolauMcGill University, Canada, [email protected]

Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.engconfintl.org/biopoly_ii

Part of the Materials Science and Engineering Commons

This Abstract and Presentation is brought to you for free and open access by the Proceedings at ECI Digital Archives. It has been accepted for inclusionin Single-use Technologies II: Bridging Polymer Science to Biotechnology Applications by an authorized administrator of ECI Digital Archives. Formore information, please contact [email protected].

Recommended CitationDan Nicolau, "Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on surfaces" in "Single-use Technologies II: Bridging PolymerScience to Biotechnology Applications", kta Mahajan (Genentech, Inc., USA) Gary Lye (University College London, UK) RegineEibl-Schindler (Zurich University of Applied Science, Switzerland) Eds, ECI Symposium Series, (2017). http://dc.engconfintl.org/biopoly_ii/46

Page 2: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Dan V. Nicolau,

Department of BioEngineering,

McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Page 3: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Outline

Protein adsorption on surfaces

Biomolecular Adsorption Database: BAD

Neural Networks-based prediction

Molecular surface of proteins

Regression-based model with breakpoint

Further work

Acknowledgements

Conclusions

Page 4: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Protein adsorption at solid-liquid interfaces Protein adsorption: Critical to a large number of biomedical and

industrial applications:

Control of disease and repair of tissue damage

Design and selection of biocompatible and biomimetic materials

Design and selection protein microarrays and lab-on-chip devices

Drug and material discovery

Despite its importance, and consequently sizeable 50+ yearsresearch, protein adsorption cannot be accurately predicted

Complexity2: the complexity of protein conformation coupled withthe complexity of the surface → more complex than protein folding!

First step in progressing towards a predictive model for a complexprocess: creation of a Biomolecular Adsorption Database (BAD)

Complexity is not the only explanation: of the ~6000 articles onprotein adsorption in the last 50 years only ~10% can be used,sometimes marginally, as often experimental conditions, e.g., proteinname, pH, ionic strength, contact angle of the surfaces, are missing

Page 5: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

BAD

Page 6: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

BAD Organization

See all records

in tables

Amino Acid

Composition table

is accessed

Page 7: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

BAD portal –http://bad.molecularsense.com/

Page 8: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Concept of Biomolecular Adsorption Database (BAD)

Web-orientated database

768 records of protein adsorption experiments

Protein, surface and fluid environment descriptors

Selecting a linked entry allows accessing detailed tables with descriptors

Page 9: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Variables reported in BAD

25 proteins

• albumin (HSA and BSA) 21%

• fibrinogen 17.7%; lysozyme 14%

• immunoglobulin G 10.4%

• alpha-lactalbumin 9.8%; myoglobin 4%

• fibronectin 3.1%

• ribonuclease 3%

• others

9 types of surfaces

• polymers 49%

• oxides 22.8%

• modified silica 11.6%

• silicon wafer 5.2%

• phospholipids 4.2%

• glass 3.9%

• others

Fluid media: 11 different buffer solutions

Page 10: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

BAD architecture and technology used Structural Query Language (SQL) – retrieval and management of database data

Technology:

ASP.NET (Active Server Pages) - server-side scripting technology for developing fully

dynamic Web pages

ADO.NET - Microsoft® ActiveX® Data Objects (ADO) + NET Framework

Primary Keys

Foreign Keys

Page 11: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

NN

Page 12: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Prediction of protein adsorption – Neural Networks

Predictions using Neural Networks

a) Hydrophobic surfaces

• 3-layer MLP (7:10:1 )

• MSE= 0.031

• R = 0.95

b) Hydrophilic surfaces

• 4-layer MLP (7:11:11:1 )

• MSE= 0.025

• R = 0.97

Inputs:• Protein hydrophobicity

• Hydrophobicity standard deviation

• Number of residues

• Protein concentration in solution

• Contact angle

• Ionic Strength

• abs (IP-pH)

Output: Protein concentration on the surface

Page 13: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Parameters relevant to biomedical devices design

Prediction of

1. Amount of adsorbed protein

• 3-layer and 4-layer Multiple Percepton models

2. Surface tension of protein-covered surfaces

3. Thickness of adsorbed protein layer

• Protein molecule ~ sphere with radius R and surface projection ЛR2

• Hexagonal packing of adsorbed proteins

2)(

21cossvlve

lv

sv

cosLVSVSL

layersnoRThickness _*2

Page 14: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Prediction of protein adsorption – Neural Networks

Page 15: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Molecular surfaces

Page 16: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Calculation of protein variables in BAD

25 proteins….

(a) Probe sphere radius 1.4 Å (b) Probe sphere radius 10 Å

(a) water accessible and (b) plane accessible surface of the protein crambin

blue: positive charge; red: negative charge

Molecular surface of proteins

Page 17: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

• Usually the probing molecular surfaces is done with small, ligand-like probes (left)

• However surfaces “probe” proteins with very large probes (right)

• Moreover, hydrophobicity is represented by amino acids (top), not at atom-level

(bottom), as charges are

Page 18: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

• The result is a very different makeup of the molecular surfaces....

Page 19: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

• The result is a very different makeup of the molecular surfaces....

Page 20: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

• The result is a very different makeup of the molecular surfaces....

Page 21: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

• The result is a very different

makeup of the molecular

surfaces....

• The correct integration of

protein adsorption-relevant

parameters should be done with

appropriate tools

Page 22: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

• The result is a very different

makeup of the molecular

surfaces....

• The correct integration of

protein adsorption-relevant

parameters should be done with

appropriate tools

Page 23: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

• The result is a very different

makeup of the molecular

surfaces....

• The correct integration of

protein adsorption-relevant

parameters should be done with

appropriate tools

Page 24: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Breakpoint

Page 25: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Piecewise linear regression model

A piecewise linear model was fitted to protein adsorption experimental data.

Let the dependent variable be v0 (in this case, protein adsorption amount) and the independent variables used in the model be v1, v2, …, vn (defined in the variable selection section).

Then according to a piecewise linear model with a single breakpoint b

where the b1i are the parameters of the model for the region before the breakpoint i.e. v0 ≤ b and the b2i are the corresponding parameters for v0 ≥ b.

Additionally, the constraint that the model must be continuous, i.e. at v0 = b, both expressions take the same value is applied.

In essence, this model works with the assumption that there are two different ‘regimes’ for the dependence of v0 on the other variables.

Page 26: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Piecewise linear regression modelThe model comprised of the following 13 variables:

1. Contact Angle (degrees)

2. |pH – Isoelectric Point|

3. Ionic Strength (M)

4. Bulk Concentration (mg/ml)

5. Area (Å2)

6. PosChDen (unit of charge/Å2)

7. NegChDen (unit of charge/ Å2)

8. HphiDen

9. HphoDen

10. SpPosChD (unit of charge/ Å2)

11. SpNegChDen (unit of charge/Å2)

12. SpHphiD

13. SpHphoD

The difference in the calculation of densities lie in which area it is scaled by.

Specific densities: area used is that for a particular property, whereas ‘normal’ density

uses the total area. For example, SpPosChD =Positive Charge ÷ Area of Positive

Charge; PosChD = Positive Charge ÷ Area

Page 27: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Results of prediction of protein adsorption

Page 28: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Further work

Page 29: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

• Preliminary results:

• Statistical power of more

advanced integration of properties

on molecular surface at atomic level

• Pearson coefficient of the

statistical link between the

hydrophobicity represented at

• bulk level (▲)

• amino acid level (■)

• atom level (●)

• Bulk hydrophobicity: no

predictive power

•Amino acid hydrophobicity better

prediction for hydrophobic surfaces

•Atom-level hydrophobicity better

for hydrophilic surfaces

Page 30: Protein-specific empirical model of protein adsorption on

Conclusions Protein adsorption at solid-liquid interfaces is critical for the design and

operation of lab-on-a-chip devices due to their small dimensions and

transient regime in which these devices usually operate.

Despite the general interest and a large amount of research in the last half a

century, the complexity of protein adsorption phenomenon precluded a

design-orientated prediction.

The online, free-access Biomolecular Adsorption Database (BAD) aims to

alleviate this gap in engineering knowledge.

Furthermore, the data present in the BAD allowed for the derivation of

predictive tools that can estimate the amount of adsorbed protein, the

thickness of the adsorbed protein layer, and the surface tension of the

protein-covered surfaces.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:

DARPA: Scaling relationships of biomolecule attachment on polymers.

EU FP7: Bio-Inspired Self-assembled Nano-Enabled Surfaces (BISNES)