26
Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 1

Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Protecting Innovations

Last Update 2015.01.21

1.0.0

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com

1

Page 2: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Appropriability

• Appropriability–The degree to which a firm is able to capture

the rents from its innovation•Appropriability is determined by how easily or quickly competitors can copy the innovation–Some innovations are inherently difficult to copy

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 2

Page 3: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 3

•Firms may attempt to protect innovations through–Patents–Trademarks–Copyrights–Trade Secrets

Appropriability

Page 4: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Patents

•Patents are rights granted by the government that excludes others from producing, using, or selling an invention

•The thing must be useful, novel, and not be obvious–Utility patents protect new and useful

processes, machines, manufactured items or combination of materials

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 4

Page 5: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 5

–Design patents protect original and ornamental designs for manufactured items

–Plant patents protect distinct new varieties of plants

•In 1998, many software algorithms became eligible for patent protection

•Countries have their own laws regarding patent protection

Patents

Page 6: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Patents

•Some treaties seek to harmonize these laws

•For example–The Paris Convention for the Protection of

Industrial Property provides that• Foreign nationals can apply for the same patent

rights in each member country as that country’s own citizens

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 6

Page 7: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 7

• Establishes a right of priority once the inventor has applied for protection in one member country

• They can then within a certain time period apply for protection in countries and be treated as if they had applied on the same date as the first application

• PCT - Patent Cooperation Treaty– An inventor can apply for patent in a single PCT receiving

office and reserve right to apply in more than 100 countries for up to 2 ½ years

– It establishes date of application in all member countries simultaneously

– It also makes results of patent process more uniform

Patents

Page 8: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Patents

PCT Covered countries

Non-PCT Covered countries

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 8

Page 9: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Trademarks

•Trademarks and Service Marks is –A word, phrase, symbol, design, or other

indicator that is used to distinguish the source of goods from one party from goods of another

–Rights to a trademark are established by the legitimate use of the mark

–They do not require registration–However, marks must be registered before suit

can be brought over use of the mark

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 9

Page 10: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 10

–Registration can also be used to establish international rights over trademark

–Two treaties simplify registration of trademarks in multiple countries

–These are• Madrid Agreement Concerning the International

Registration of Marks• Madrid Protocol

–The 84 Countries that adhere to either or both of these are in the Madrid Union

Trademarks

Page 11: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyrights

•Copyright is–A form of protection granted to works of

authorship–Copyright prohibits others from

• Reproducing the work in copies or phonorecords• Preparing derivative works based on the work• Distributing copies or phonorecords for sale, rental,

or lease• Performing the work publicly• Displaying the work publicly

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 11

Page 12: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 12

–Work that is not fixed in tangible form is not eligible

–Copyright is established by the first legitimate use

–However, the doctrine of fair use stipulates that others can typically use copyrighted material for purposes such as criticism, new reporting, teaching, research, and so on

–Copyright for the works created after 1978 have protection for author’s life plus 70 years

Copyrights

Page 13: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyrights

•Copyright law varies from country to country

•However, the Berne Union for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Property called the Berne Convention specifies a minimum level of protection for member countries

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 13

Page 14: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 14

•The Berne convention also eliminates differential rights to citizens versus foreign nationals

Copyrights

Page 15: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Trade Secrets

• A trade secret is information that belongs to a business that is generally unknown to others

•Firm can protect proprietary product or process as trade secret without disclosing detailed information that would be required in the patent

•It enables broad class of assets and activities to be protectable

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 15

Page 16: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 16

–To qualify• Information must not be generally known or

ascertainable• Information must offer a distinctive advantage to the

firm that is contingent upon its secrecy• The trade secret holder must exercise reasonable

measures to protect its secrecy

Trade Secrets

Page 17: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Effectiveness

• In some industries, legal protection mechanisms are more effective than others–Pharmaceutical patents are powerful; in

electronics they might be easily invented around

• It is notoriously difficult to protect manufacturing processes and techniques

• In some situations, diffusing a technology may be more valuable than protecting it

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 17

Page 18: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 18

• However, once control is relinquished it is difficult to reclaim

Effectiveness

Page 19: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 19

• In 1980, IBM was in a hurry to introduce a personal computer

• It used off-the-shelf components such as Intel microprocessors an operating system from Microsoft, MS DOS

• It believed that its proprietary BIOS would protect the computer from being copied

For Example

Page 20: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 20

• However, Compaq reverse engineered the BIOS in a matter of months without violating the copyright, and quickly introduced a computer that behaved like an IBM computer in every way

• Compaq sold a record-breaking 47,000 IBM-compatible computers its first year, and other clones were quick to follow

For Example

Page 21: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Effectiveness

• Wholly Proprietary Systems v Wholly Open Systems–Wholly proprietary systems may be legally

produced or augmented only by their developers

–Wholly open systems may be freely accessed, augmented and distributed by anyone

–Many technologies lie somewhere between these extremes

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 21

Page 22: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 22

Effectiveness

Page 23: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Effectiveness

•Advantages of Protection–Proprietary systems offer greater rent

appropriability–Rents can be used to invest in further

development, promotion, and distribution–Protection give the firm control over the

evolution of the technology and complements

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 23

Page 24: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 24

•Advantages of Diffusion–Diffusion may accrue more rapid adoptions if

produced and promoted by multiple firms–The technology might be improved by other

firms, although external development poses its own risks

Effectiveness

Page 25: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Effectiveness

• Production Capabilities, Marketing Capabilities, and Capital– Factors influencing benefits of protection v

diffusion• Can the firm produce the technology at a sufficient

volume or quality levels• Are complements important• Are they available in sufficient range and quality• Can the firm afford to develop and produce them

itself

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 25

Page 26: Protecting Innovations Last Update 2015.01.21 1.0.0 Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015  1

Copyright Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 2015 www.chipps.com 26

• Is there industry opposition against sole source technology

• Can the firm improve the technology well enough and fast enough to compete with others

• How important is it to prevent the technology from being altered in ways that fragment it as a standard

• How valuable is architectural control to the firm• Does it have a major stake in complements for the

technology

Effectiveness