Upload
jeffrey-mcgee
View
222
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Propagation ofPropagation ofElectromagnetic WavesElectromagnetic Waves
Zbynek RaidaZbynek Raida
Dept. of Radio ElectronicsDept. of Radio ElectronicsBrno University of TechnologyBrno University of TechnologyBrno, CzechiaBrno, Czechia
• Over 1 GHz:– Hydrometeors attenuation– Molecule resonances– Atmospheric refraction
Direct WaveDirect Wave (1) (1)
• Up to 1 GHz:– Like propagation in vacuum
E P D ref 30
• Fresnelzones:
Direct WaveDirect Wave (2) (2)
• Connectioncondition:
r R h hp ef 2 1 2
r h hp 4 12 1 2,
Space WaveSpace Wave (1) (1)
• Direct + reflected:
• Mathematically:
rkr
DPeeEE rjkj
efef cos2130
1 21
Space WaveSpace Wave (3) (3)
2
2
cos6060
cos6060~
jj
jj
rr
rrV
2
2
cos60sin60
cos60sin60~
jj
jj
rr
rrH
• Reflection coefficient:
rhh 21arctan
Space WaveSpace Wave (4) (4)
function [Ev,Eh] = spacwave( h1,h2,r,epr,gam,f,P,D)
lam = 3e+8/f; % wavelengthk = 2*pi/lam; % wave numberdelta = atan( (h1+h2)/r); % elevation angledel_r = 2*h1*h2 / r; % trajectory differenceE0 = sqrt( 30*P*D) / r; % direct wave intensityterm1 = epr - j*60*lam*gam; % auxiliary termsterm2 = sqrt( term1 - cos( delta)^2);term3 = term1*sin(delta);rhoh = (term3-term2) / (term3+term2); % horizont.rhov = (term1-term2) / (term1+term2); % vertical.Ev = E0 * abs( 1 + rhov*exp(j*k*del_r)); % vertical.pol.Eh = E0 * abs( 1 + rhoh*exp(j*k*del_r)); % horizont.pol.
Macro-cells (1)Macro-cells (1)
• Radius: tens of kilometers
• Height of base station antennas significantlyhigher than surrounding (trees, buildings)
• Area coverage dominantly influenced bydirectivity patter of base station antennas
• Environment: fading due to theshading effects
• Models: empirical and physical
Macro-cellsMacro-cells (2): (2): path losspath loss
• Model based on extensive set ofmeasured attenuation
• Searching for an appropriate function:
• the function meets measured data
• function parameters set for a given environment, frequency and antenna height to minimize the difference between measured and computed
• model can be used for designing communication system in similar environment
Macro-cellsMacro-cells (3): (3): path losspath loss
nT
R
r
k
LP
P
1
kK
dBKrnL
log10
log10
refref
Lr
rnL
log10
n = exponent of path lossk = inverted value of propagation attenuation for r = 1 m
Macro-cells (4): clutter factorMacro-cells (4): clutter factor
• Measurements in urban and sub-urban areas: path loss exponent 4
• the same like plane Earth surface
• absolute attenuation is higher clutter factor
• Models differ in values of parameters k and n
• Egli: method based on a number of measurements in various cities in USA
Macro-cells (5): Macro-cells (5): clutter factorclutter factor
mbc LhfRL log20log20log40
10forlog20376
10forlog103.76
mm
mmm hh.
hhL
Micro-cellsMicro-cells (1) (1)
• Reduced cell sizewhere access to thesystem required by high number of users
• The height of antennas typically 3 to 6 meters(lightning poles, building walls)
• Coverage (hundreds meters) given by electricproperties of buildings and area configuration
Micro-cells (2): Micro-cells (2): dual slopedual slope
b
nb
n
b
bn
rr
rrr
k
rrr
k
Lfor
for
1
1
2
1
12
1 1
1nn
b
n
rr
r
k
L
Pico-cellsPico-cells (2) (2)
• Attenuation characterized by:
• fixed path loss exponent n = 2
• additional attenuation factors related to the number of floors nf and walls nw between stations
• where af and aw are attenuation coefficients per floor (wall), and L1 is attenuation in the distance 1 meter
wwff ananrLL log201