9
Proof-of-Concept Demonstrators and Other Evils of Application- Led Research Nigel Davies

Proof-of-Concept Demonstrators and Other Evils of Application-Led Research Nigel Davies

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Proof-of-Concept Demonstrators and Other Evils of Application-Led Research Nigel Davies

Proof-of-Concept Demonstrators and Other Evils of Application-

Led ResearchNigel Davies

Page 2: Proof-of-Concept Demonstrators and Other Evils of Application-Led Research Nigel Davies

background

most : collaborative tools for mobile workers

Guide : building the hitch-hikers guide to the galaxy

e-Campus : networks of pervasive public displays

Page 3: Proof-of-Concept Demonstrators and Other Evils of Application-Led Research Nigel Davies

deployment

statement:”you can’t have ubicomp without deployment – that’s the ubiquitous bit in ubiquitous computing “

Page 4: Proof-of-Concept Demonstrators and Other Evils of Application-Led Research Nigel Davies

a position statement

clarify the distinction between application-led research and application development.

– can you get your requirements from elsewhere ? stop too many people from developing applications.

– community self-regulation. stop people from developing applications from scratch.

– make components/concepts easier to use. develop metrics and benchmarks for (a) evaluating

applications and (b) evaluating middleware.

– enable comparisons and evaluations.

Page 5: Proof-of-Concept Demonstrators and Other Evils of Application-Led Research Nigel Davies

and then …

Page 6: Proof-of-Concept Demonstrators and Other Evils of Application-Led Research Nigel Davies

the Brewery Arts Centre

two weeks of events themed around the 1940s

our focus was “Evidence”

test case for early e-Campus technologies

designed to make sure we start to understand practical issues of developing and deploying e-Campus systems

this week and last week are the Brewery’s “Forties Fortnight”

Page 7: Proof-of-Concept Demonstrators and Other Evils of Application-Led Research Nigel Davies

evidence

content is coming from:

– the video diary system– digitised interviews with local residents– digitised old film footage– images (“art”) created using the Kirlian table –

developed by .:the pooch:.

Page 8: Proof-of-Concept Demonstrators and Other Evils of Application-Led Research Nigel Davies

deployment

Page 9: Proof-of-Concept Demonstrators and Other Evils of Application-Led Research Nigel Davies

a position statement clarify the distinction between application-led research and

application development.– can you get your requirements from elsewhere ?– clarify the distinction between applications development for

requirements capture/domain knowledge, inspiration and application development for evaluation (proof!).

stop too many people from developing applications.– community self-regulation.– “stop” people developing applications for the wrong reasons.

stop people from developing applications from scratch.– make components/concepts easier to use– share application experiences, domain knowledge (often done through

seminars – can we do this through papers) and test data develop metrics and benchmarks for (a) evaluating applications

and (b) evaluating middleware.– enable comparisons and evaluations.– can we generate these from applications – standard problems.