5
Project-wise Report of Sectoral Monitoring Committee: 1. Project Title: Development of Indian Highway Capacity Manual (INDO-HCM): ESC-0304 2. Project Details: Nodal Lab CSIR - Central Road Research Institute (CRRI ), New Delhi Participating Labs liT (Roorkee) , liT (Mumbai) , liT (Guwahati), SPA (Delhi), SVNIT (Surat), II EST (Howrah) and Anna University, (Chennai). Nodal Officer Champion:DrS Velmurugan, Senior Principal Scientist, CS I R-CRRI Co-Champion: DrKRavi nder, Principal Scientist, CSIR- CRRI Taskforce Chairman Prof. Satish Chandra, Director, CSIR - CRRI Total Man Days 4360 mandays Approved Cost Rs 999. 150 lakhs Fund received Rs 801.903 lakhs Fund utilized Rs 725. 438 lakhs 3. Periodic Key Recommendations of Task Force/RC/Monitoring Committee S.N 0 2 3 6 Key Recommendations of Task Force/RC/Monitoring Committee Chairman , RC: Better coord i nation desirable amongst the participating insti tutes considering the involvement of seven academic institutes spread across the country Prof Partha Chakraborty: Attempt to deploy uniform methodology for data collection by the concerned Regional Coord inators and CSIR- CRRI Prof Veeraragavan and Prof Partha Chakraborty: Status of data collection by all the participati ng institutes and including CSIR-CRRI Chairman RC:Report overall/ package wise progress in bar chart form . Prof Veeraragavan:After comp l etion of the study data shall be kept on CSIR- CRRI , website with access to other researchers. Prof Partha Chakraborty:Open access of the data with restricted password Action taken on Key Recommendations Coordination among the participati ng institutes monitored through the progress revi ew meetings/TFC meetings Uniform methodology devised (RIHCAM and TFC meetings conducted time to time) Reviewed in the progress meeting time to time Progress shown in suggested format This deci sion will be taken in consultation with CSIR after submi ssion of the Final Manual Chairman , RC: I nform progress and Extra efforts made Proposed Deliverables Achieved Achieved Achieved Achieved 7 shortfalls in the project. Try completing enab l ed package Achieved within time if any lagging beh ind completed wi thin time Page 1 of 5 Revised Deliverable (approved by Task Force) Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Appl i cable Not Applicable

Project-wise Report of Sectoral Monitoring Committee: 1. Project …c-dis.csir.res.in/SharedROMs/SMC_Meeting_Minutes/HRCSS/7 INDO-H… · Project-wise Report of Sectoral Monitoring

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Project-wise Report of Sectoral Monitoring Committee:

1. Project Title: Development of Indian Highway Capacity Manual (INDO-HCM): ESC-0304

2. Project Details:

Nodal Lab CSIR - Central Road Research Institute (CRRI), New Delhi

Participating Labs liT (Roorkee), liT (Mumbai) , liT (Guwahati), SPA (Delhi), SVNIT (Surat), IIEST (Howrah) and Anna University, (Chennai).

Nodal Officer Champion:DrS Velmurugan, Senior Principal Scientist, CSIR-CRRI Co-Champion: DrKRavinder, Principal Scientist, CSIR- CRRI

Taskforce Chairman Prof. Satish Chandra, Director, CSIR - CRRI Total Man Days 4360 mandays Approved Cost Rs 999.150 lakhs Fund received Rs 801.903 lakhs Fund utilized Rs 725.438 lakhs

3. Periodic Key Recommendations of Task Force/RC/Monitoring Committee S.N

0

2

3

6

Key Recommendations of Task Force/RC/Monitoring Committee

Chairman, RC: Better coordination desirable amongst the participating institutes considering the involvement of seven academic institutes spread across the country

Prof Partha Chakraborty: Attempt to deploy uniform methodology for data collection by the concerned Regional Coordinators and CSIR- CRRI

Prof Veeraragavan and Prof Partha Chakraborty: Status of data collection by all the participating institutes and including CSIR-CRRI

• Chairman RC:Report overall/ package wise progress in bar chart form.

• Prof Veeraragavan:After completion of the study data shall be kept on CSIR­CRRI, website with access to other researchers.

• Prof Partha Chakraborty:Open access of the data with restricted password

Action taken on Key Recommendations

Coordination among the participating institutes monitored through the progress review meetings/TFC meetings

Uniform methodology devised (RIHCAM and TFC meetings conducted time to time)

Reviewed in the progress meeting time to time

Progress shown in suggested format

This decision will be taken in consultation with CSIR after submission of the Final Manual

• Chairman, RC: Inform progress and Extra efforts made

Proposed

Deliverables

Achieved

Achieved

Achieved

Achieved

7 shortfalls in the project. Try completing enabled package Achieved within time if any lagging behind completed within time

Page 1 of 5

Revised Deliverable

(approved by Task Force)

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

• Prof Attri: Environmental emissions Emissions due to excess

8 due to excess capacity on National capacity has been not

Achieved considered in this manual Highways at present

• Partha Chakraborty: Make one or two One man committee member committee to see the formed for the technical

9 uniformity and consistency of all the and proof editing: Work Achieved

chapters of lndo-HCM Draft Manual under progress.

4. Project Achievements:

s. No. Deliverables promised at start

1st Year (2012·13) (i) National Workshop titled,

"Methodology for Indo-Highway 1 Capacity Manual" (MICHAM) to

follow uniform methodology ii) A State-Of-the Art Report

(SOAR) 2nd Year (2013·14)

iii) National Review Workshop

2 v) Generation and Updation of Traffic Database and Traffic Flow Characteristics for Indian roads

3

4

5

3rdYear (2014·15) (v) Conduct of RIHCAM-2015 (vi) Fundamental Speed-Density

and Speed - Volume relationships for a wide range of roadway and traffic conditions in India 4th Year (2015-16)

(vii) Updation of Traffic Database and Procedure for determining the Operational Efficiencies of different categories of Indian roads including intersections with all possible combinations of geometry and operating conditions

(viii) Conduct of RIHCAM-2016 at liT (Bombay)

5thYear (2016-17) (ix) Indian Highway Capacity

Manual (lndo-HCM)

Page 2 of 5

Deliverables Achieved

• Conducted by CSIR - CRRI in coordination with the RCs at SVNIT, Surat from 17th to 19th January, 2013.

• SOAR Completed by March, 2013

• Review workshop of Indian Highway CApacity Manual -2014" {RIHCAM-2014) conducted at AU (Chennai1) in coordination with the RCs from 28thto 30th March, 2014.

• Submission of Yearly Progress Report

• RIHCAM-2015 conducted at liT (Guwahati) in coordination with the RCs Anna University from 20rd to 22nd March, 2015.

•Submission of Mid Term Progress Report to CSIR.

• RIHCAM-2016 conducted at liT (Bombay) in coordination with the RCs Anna University from 3th to 5th March, 2016.

• Submission of Yearly Progress Report to CSIR.

• National Dissemination Workshop in February, 2017;Sincethe project is at the verge of completion, the draft Final Report Version 2.0

Not Applicable

Not Applicable

If not achieved, reasons thereof N.A

N.A.

N.A.

N.A

N.A

N.A

(x) Guidelines for Roadway Capacity and LoS estimation

prepared by the above lndo-HCM study team led by the Champion and Co-Champion is being scrutinized for its uniformity by an independent expert. The principle task in the above exercise is to ascertain the uniformity and sequencing in each chapter as well as consistency among different chapters.

• Report submission to CSIR is targeted to be achieved by March, 2017.

5. Outcomes and outputs from the Project: The principle goal of this mission mode project is develop indigenous manual for Indian traffic conditions.

A. Outcomes a. Lead(s) identified: Number and names with TRL b. Technology/Product developed: Number and nameswith TRL level of Development c. Technology/Product transferred: Number and nameswith name of licensee(s) d. Facility created: Number and names with uniqueness & utility e. Sponsored projects obtained (with details): 7 nos. amounting Rs. 101.40 Lakhs [without the

applicable Service Tax (ST) between 2012- 17] i. Traffic Circulation Plan on Savitri Cinema Road - Sponsored by Delhi Development Authority at a cost

Rs. 9.0 Lakhs plus the applicable Service Tax ii. Design and Development of Hallomajra Light Point Intersection & Transport Chowk Intersection at

Chandigarh - Sponsored by Chandigarh Administration @ a cost of Rs. 11.40 Lakhs plus the applicable Service Tax

iii. Development of Traffic Circulation Plan for Achieving Signal Free Movement at Mohan Nagar Intersection, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh - Sponsored by Ghaziabad Development Authority@ a cost of Rs. 12.0 Lakhs plus the applicable Service Tax

iv. Intersection Improvement Plans for Four Intersections in Meerut City, Uttar Pradesh - Sponsored by Meerut Development Authority@ a cost of Rs. 12.60 Lakhs plus the applicable Service Tax

v. Assessment of Need for Roadway Capacity Augmentation of Pune- Shirur (SH-60)- Sponsored by PWD Pune Region, Maharashtra @ a cost of Rs. 18.85 Lakhs plus the applicable Service Tax

vi. Assessment of Need for Capacity Augmentation of Mumbra Bypass in Thane District - Sponsored by PWD Panvel Region, Maharashtra@ a cost of Rs. 16.85 Lakhs plus the applicable Service Tax.

vii. Development of Improvement Plans for Selected Roundabouts and Technical Feasibility Study towards the provision of Grade Separation Facility on Lohia Path in Lucknow City - Sponsored by Uttar Pradesh PWD@ a cost of Rs. 20.70 Lakhs plus the appllicable Service Tax.

1. External Cash Flow (ECF) generated: Total of Rs. 101.40 Lakhs excluding Service Tax (S. T.) 2. Societal impact created: Engineers I Planners I Bureaucrats can look to follow the realistic

capacity values evolved in this manual during the capacity augmentation of the existing facilities instead of using either the obsolete values available in the relevant IRC documents or directly adopting the values given in US-HCM (2010) or Chinese HCM (2005) or Indonesian HCM (1999).

b. Outputs: 1. Periodic Reports Submitted: Yearly Progress Reports as well as Mid Term Progress reports

have been submitted to CSIR in time bound manner. 2. Publications

i. Total Number of SCI Publications : 27 numbers ii. CumulativeiF (as per 2015 ffgures): 20.22

Page 3 of 5

iii. Average IF : 0.81 iv. Average IF per Scientist/ Faculty :0.78

i. Patents Filed (or other forms of IP generated such as Copyrights, Designs etc.) - Not relevant for this mission mode project as it focuses on maiden manual development for India.

ii. Granted - N.A. iii. Licensed - N.A.

3. Human Resource generated i. Ph.D .fellows (give Ph.D.s completed & pursuing separately): 6 completed; 5 ongoing ii. Project Fellows: 9 nos. which includes Project Fellows and Senior Project Fellows iii. Skills imparted: 63 M.Tech. students pursued dissertation and 45 students pursued their

Summer I Winter Internship during their B. Tech./ M.Tech. pursuits. 4. External collaborations established: liT (Roorkee), IIT(Bombay), liT (Guwahati) , SPA (New

Delhi), Anna University (Chennai), SVNIT (Surat) and IIEST (Howrah).

Status of Lead/Technology/ Salient TRL of the IP Status of

DPR/Commerci s. Product (listed Features of Lead/ Lead/T echnolo al Technical

No. above in Lead/Technol Technology gy/Product Reportof Lead/ outcomes) ogy/ Product /Product Technology/

Product Not relevant for th is mission mode project as it focuses on maiden manual development for India.

6. Sectoral Monitoring Committee Recommendations on Lead/Technology/Product (listed above):

No lead reported

Criteria SMC Recommendations Name of Lead/Technology /Product Is the Lead/ Technology/Product worth taking up further? What is the further R&D efforts that need to be put by CSIRICSIR laboratories? Global benchmarking of the Lead/Technology/Product specifically wrt specifications and cost Is the Lead/Techno~ogy/Product worthy of commissioning a DPR at this stage? What are the likely resources and time duration required for taking forward the identified Lead/ Technology/Product to the desired TRL? Potential stake holders who may be appropriate to partner technically as well as financially Suggestion for plausible road map towards further development of lead/technology/product for achieving desired TRL GO/NO GO further development Other suggestions, if any, related to benefits/usage/ commercialization

7. Identified "lessons to be learnt", especially from shortcomings/failures:

Page 4 of 5

8. Comments on financial progress on the project· fund availability and utilization of fund in the project: Financial progress is satisfactory and investments made are justified

9. Sectoral Monitoring Committee Recommendations on Facility creation or other outcomes:

10. Grading of Project Execution: Outstanding/Excellent/Very Good/ Good/Satisfactory/Un-satisfactory

Excellent

11. Additional comments, if any:

• Considering the fact that country didn't have such manual earlier, development of this manual for the first time is a credible initiative

• Road map and timelines for creating new codes of practices under IRC to be prepared

• Digital manual with dynamic data upgradation can be explored

4y,. Prof Manoj Dutta

(Member)

--~~~ ____-;-

Prof P S N Rao (Member)

~ Shri Sthaladipti Saha

(Member)

w~ Director, CSIR-SERC

(TF Chairman - Member)

Page 5 of 5

Shri P R Mehta (Member)

Shri Ajit Singh (Member)

Dr S Srikanth (Member Convener)

Direc~l (TF Chairman - Member)

Prof M R Madhav (Member)

Shri N K Nanda (Member)

. ~1&\~~\) Director, CSIR-CRRI

(TF Chairman- Member)

o~bs~ (TF C airman - Member)