Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Project: Improving policies for forest plantations to balance smallholder, industry and environmental needs in Lao PDR and Vietnam
Lao PDR and Vietnam have policies to support the expansion of tree plantations to meet economic development, poverty alleviation and landscape restoration goals
Lao PDR: 130,000 ha of timber plantations. Yet, concerns about adverse impacts on local land rights, rural livelihoods and other social and environmental values.
Slow establishment of new plantations; moratorium on the granting of new concession areas; and future investment in plantations is uncertain
Vietnam: 1.7 M ha of plantations; managed by small holders ‐major livelihood contribution; environmental and social benefits.
Future direction: greater benefits to small holders and industry, supply to an internationally‐significant furniture industry and improved environmental sustainability
2
Growing global demand for wood Significant international investment funds to invest in forest plantations
3
4
• New products from wood• Biomaterials• Biofuels• Biorefinery outputs• Engineered wood products
Source: Newforests
Forestry can contribute to poverty alleviation –potentially more than many other sectors ‐ but often does not
Industrial scale commercial forestry jobs and income have at best avoided exacerbating poverty
Where the policy framework is favourable, evidence is growing that small and medium forestry enterprises can reduce poverty through:
improved economy‐wide impacts and for large and small‐scale commercial forestry to broaden livelihood opportunities
poor people to influence decisions that affect policy
Needs: good information, strong local democracy, fair enforcement of simple rules, creative ideas and models, and a range of highly committed partnerships.
5
How to link large‐scale capital investment with smallholder plantation timber producers to provide social, economic and environmental benefits?
6
Australian project partners have been actively involved in research and education in both countries for more than 7 years (maybe longer?)
Considerable research collaboration on different aspects of plantation policy and management
Formal consultations in November and December 2014 identified key issues and research needs
7
Australia:
Support small and large scale private sector development through innovative models for private sector partnerships and to engage local producers with global markets
Lao PDR
Efficient and sustainable forestry industries, improved food security, technical and agribusiness research collaboration, improved institutional, training and communication frameworks that enhance capacity development
Improved natural resource management that benefits livelihoods and food security, through delivering land‐use options to smallholders
Vietnam
human resource development, improved economic integration within the forest sector and environmental sustainability
and addresses the 2014‐15 Operational Plan priority, of “advancement towards higher‐value plantation forestry products.”
8
FST/2010/012 Enhancing key elements of value chains for plantation‐grown wood
FST/2011/003 Effective implementation of payments for environmental services,
FST/2012/041 Teak‐based agroforestry systems to enhance and diversify smallholder livelihoods in Luang Prabang province
FST/2004/057 Enhancing on‐farm incomes through improved silvicultural management of teak in Luang Prabang Province
9
FST/2010/012 Enhancing key elements of value chains for plantation‐grown wood
FST/2008/039 Enhancement of production of acacia and eucalypt peeled and sliced veneer products in Vietnam and Australia
‘Acacia Economy in Vietnam’ by Prof. Neil Byron 10
To develop policy and institutional options for plantation development
To understand the positive and negative social, economic and environmental impacts associated with different tree plantation development approaches
To create a network for policy learning that builds capacity in plantation sector policy analysis, development and implementation
11
Evaluation of current policies
Research on policy options and their likely impact on policy goals
Evaluation of the potential impacts of different policy options.
Three‐year project with activities are designed to facilitate policy learning across the two countries and with neighbours in the region
12
13
20 researchers• 7 from Australia• 7 from Lao PDR• 6 from Vietnam• 4 new
appointments (2 in Lao, 2 in VN)
14
Lao PDRNUoL,
NAFRI, StoraEnso
AustraliaUniversity of Melbourne, ANU, USQ
VietnamVAFS,
VNForests, IPSARD, HUAF
Other plantation companies
GovernmentDepartments
NGOs
Communities
International organisations Other ACIAR projects
Consultants
GovtDepartments
Plantationcompanies
SawmillersFurniture cos
15
• Economic, social and environmental investigation
• Linking across scales
• Analysis and synthesis
• Co‐production of research results
16
Websites in English,Lao and Vietnamese
Meetings and exchanges (formal and informal) with in‐country policy makers/other researchers.
Online collaboration tool; regular video‐conferencing
Project team meetings in both partner countries and Australia.
17
Principles:
Co‐design
Co‐production
Co‐implementation
18
Policy Recommendations
Presentations to policy makers
Reports Journal articles
Forum for dialogue
Conference presentations
19
Improved national policy and institutions
Industry development
and smallholder benefits
Environmental sustainability
Provincial government International investment
Efficient provincialgovernance
Profitable businesses
Villages and households
Sustainable livelihoods
Reduced poverty
Increased income diversity
Reduced vulnerability
Increased plantation investment Greater involvement in plantations from
smallholder growers Reduced conflict Greater community benefit from plantation
investment Increased wood production and value adding Increased value along the supply chain,
especially to smallholders and the associated rural communities
Wider participation in plantation policy development
Increased capacity for policy research
20
21
More than 60% to country partners
Other Australian Partners
22
ACIAR fundsCommissioned OrganisationUniversity of Melbourne 428,151Collaborating InstitutionsAustralian National University 87,800University of Southern Queensland 49,905 Lao PDRNUoL 140,070 NAFRI 77,333 VietnamVAFS (inc.VNForests) 144,533 IPSARD 54,075 HUAF 18,000 TOTAL $999,866IN‐KIND $470,088
ACIAR Fund: $999,866More than 60% to country partners
Funded researchers at NUoLNAFRIVAFSIPSARD
Other resourcesPhD student ANUAYAD at NUoL
Forest Plantation in Vietnam: Context, Opportunities, and ChallengesLe Van BachVNForest
Outlines
Overview of Forest in Vietnam
Policy on Forest Plantation Development
Opportunities
Challenges
Conclusions2
Overview of forest in Vietnam
Cove
r, %
Fore
st a
reas
. M
illio
n ha
Cover, % Plantation, million ha
Total areas, million ha
Plantation areas (ha) according to eco-region (2014)
South West
South East
Highlands
South Central
North Central
Red river delta
North East
North West
Plantation areas by functions and owners in 2013
• Large production forest area (50%)•Plantation areas of households and individuals: 1,7 million ha (of which, 50% are production forests); • Plantation areas of each household are of 1-3 ha
Special forestsProtection forestsProduction forests
Forest Management Board
State Enterprises
Other Sectors
Millitary
Households
Communities
Others
The export value of wood products from 2006-2015Ex
port
val
ues,
bill
ion
USD
The policies on plantation development
Afforestation is investment incentives, largely in the areas of investment incentives.
Production forest plantation is supported apart from state fund.
Applying export tax incentives for different kind of exported wooden furniture.
7
Opportunities
Policy on encouraging plantation development continue tobe confirmed.
Wooden furniture and forest products ‘s market is increasingly extended.
8
Challenges
Low productivity, plantation quality; and low ability of competition with other crops.
Scattered and small production scale, unconection.
Fine processing industry development is not commensurable
Difficult to access the credit investment.9
Conclussions
Research, propose and promulgate policies to mitigate the existing challenges, take advantage of opportunities, and promote the development of production forests, especially for small-scale forest owners linked to processing and marketing is the central task of restructuring the forest sector in Vietnam
10
Thank you
Forest Production, Country Context, Opportunities and Challenges
Workshop on: Improving policies for forest plantations to balance smallholder, industry and environmental needs in Lao PDR and Vietnam (ADP-2014-047 )
Vientiane, 22 March 2016Prepared by:
Vongvilay Vongkhamsao (FRC/NAFRI/MAF)
Country Information• Country area of 23.68 million ha • Population of 6.8 million (22 p/Sq.km)• GDP per capita = US$ 1,628; Services
37.4%; Industry 33.2%, Agriculture‐Forestry 23.5% (2014)
• 49 ethnic group• 76% of work force in agriculture and
forestry sector.• Nearly 80% live in rural areas and
depend heavily on forest resource forsubsistence, especially NTFPs
Land areas
40.34%
34.75%
24.91%
Land types
Forest land
Potential forreforestaionOther landtypes
1. Forest land = 40.34 % ( 9,553,000 ha)
2. Potential area for rehabilitation = 34.75 % ( 8,229,000 ha)
3. Other land types: 24.91 % (5,889,000 ha)
4. Total area: 23,680,000 ha
Land types
Forestry PolicyForest Policy:Increase forest cover to 70% in 2020 (in which
plantation only 0.5M); 65% in 2015.
Strategic approaches: – Protect and sustainably manage the
remaining forests – Restore/rehabilitate the degraded forest
lands 6.5 Mha (in which plantation only 0.5M).
– Recognize economic value of ecosystem services of forests
– Socialize forest management (by all and for all)
– Integrate SFM with other developments (land, agriculture, livelihood, etc)
Forest Types in Laos by 2020
I. Production Forest (3.1 M ha) 51 areas
II. Conservation Forest/NationalProtected Areas (4.5 M ha)24 NBCAs + 2 corridors
III. (iii) Protection Forest 47 areas(7.9 M ha)
‐ Plantation 0.5 M ha‐ Village forest and community forest
about 1 M ha
Total: 16.6 M ha (70% cover by year2020)
Forest cover in 2010 & 2015
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
North Middle South Total
33.9
42.747.2
40.339.9
49.555.5
47
20102015
Source: Dept. of Forestry, 2015
Tree Plantations
• 1932‐1975 plantation with Teak: Xayyabouly, Luangprabang, Vientiane, Khammouan, Savanhnakhet, Saravan, Champasack, Sekong. Heave at Bachiang District Champasack.
• 1970 Lao‐Australia Forest Plantation with Eucalytusspp. (Nongteng, Dongdok, Nammo, Nonglom trials), …
1,041 1,384 1,973
17,705
54,650
85,055
171,670
95,201
72,362
‐
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
200,000
1975‐80 1981‐85 1986‐90 1991‐95 1996‐00 2001‐05 2006‐10 2011‐15 2016‐20
Plantation in Laos 1975‐2015 & plan 2016‐2020 (Source: DoF, 2015)
Rubber, 271,079, 54%
Euc. & Acacia, 66,692, 13%
Teak, 50,000, 10%
Agar wood, 12,000, 3%
Other species, 45,938, 9%
New 2016‐20, 54,291, 11%
Plantation porpotion 2015 (ha) (Source: DoF, 2015)
Rubber Euc. & Acacia Teak Agar wood Other species New 2016‐20
Tree seed and seed sources for short rotation species
1. Eucalyptus camaldulensis: 5 ha in Namsouang, Forest Research Centre, Vientiane Capital, established 1996 by Lao‐ADB Forest plantation Project.
2. Eucalyptus camaldulensis: 5 ha in Savanhnakhet, Provincial Forest Office, established 1996 by Lao‐ADB Forest plantation Project.
3. Seed import from original Australia: Eucalyptus and Acacia
4. Cunninghamia lancelolata plantation in Phongsaly Province by Chinese company
5. Other sources from clones Vietnam, Thailand, China, … used by 5 majors companies FDI: (Oji, Birla, Sun Paper, StoraEnso, Boualapha)
• 50 000 ha teak plantations in Lao PDR
• 98% smallholder managed• 26 500 ha in LPB Province
Now,
Challenges of Forest production
• Challenges:– Large scale conversion into cash crop
– Hydropower and mining– Shifting cultivation (Northern part)
– Forest fire
Challenges face in Forest production• Lack of strategy to promote on tree plantaion, lack of
detail plan for tree planting such as area, species requirements, information on environmental conditions
• Lack of incentives for promoting on tree planting, especially land fee/tax collection from investors
• Lack of M&E for plantation establishment, some companies change concessional land to other purposes.
• Government suspended land concession for tree planting ( fast growing tree species and rubber trees)
• Insufficient budget to support
Plan 2016‐2020 Maintain existing forest in order to increase forest cover at 70%
by 2020 through forest rehabilitation in production forest at 650,000 ha and set up plantation at 100,000 ha (20,000 ha/yr). ( currently 440,000 ha tree planted or about 90% completed)
issue certified forest at 20% of total production forest. Develop village sustainable forest management plan at 1500
villages. Mobilise funding support from both local international donors. Forest law enforcement and governance. Capacity building on forest restoration and plant conservation. Participatory land use planning at the village level with focus on
agro-ecological zoning. Policy reforms and strengthening of interagency cooperation .
Thank you for attention
20-Jun-17
1
Tree plantations:policy successes & challenges
Peter KanowskiThe Australian National Universitye: [email protected]
SummaryTree plantations are: part of landscapes, enterprises & value chains
- so other policies matter too…
diverse (different forms, scales, purposes)- so policies need to accommodate diversity
relatively long-term investments- so policies need to be stable & robust
Planted forests: a continuum of forms
Source: http://www.fao.org/forestry/plantedforests/67504/enSee: Carle & Holmgren. 2008. Forest Products J 58(12): 6-18, Figure 1
20-Jun-17
2
Tree plantations: a diversity of forms
Luang Prabang, Lao PDR Prachinburi, Thailand - csr.doubleapaper.com/en/khanna_paper.asp
Veracel, Brazil Balsa smallholder, PNG
Tree plantations at different scales
Clockwise from bottom left: Zambia (CIFOR); Da Nang, Vietnam (x3)
Value chains of different character
20-Jun-17
3
Most tree plantation expansion = “fastwood”
McDermott 2012 for FSC, Figure 1 CIFOR 2003
(Intensively-managed) tree plantations
Photo Source: FAO 2010 Planted forests in sustainable forest management
Tree plantations for restoration (too)
Photo: Tony Bartlett
20-Jun-17
4
Tree planations: a history of contest
Photo credits: Philip Adlard; stopgetrees.org/; EJOLT - Vanessa Vilarinho
Tree plantations: continuing debate
www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/plantaciones-final-ingles.pdf
Tree plantations: principles for the future
theforestsdialogue.org/initiatives/IMPF www.fao.org/forestry/plantedforests/en/
20-Jun-17
5
Tree plantation policy: building blocks
Tree plantations: learning good practice
http://newgenerationplantations.org/en/what/
Tree plantations: principles for the future
Good governance Corporate responsibility
Enabling investment & market-driven Equitable sharing of benefits & costs
A landscape approach Sustainability across scales
20-Jun-17
6
Tree plantations – SME successes
Java - Photo: Tony Bartlett; CIFOR Annual Report 2013
Veracel, Brazil Visy paper mill, Australia
Tree plantations – corporate successes
Policy context 3:
Processing & markets
Industry policiesTrade policies
…
Policy context 2:
Field to processor
Plantation registrationHarvesting permitTransport permit
…
Policy context 1:
Tree growing
Land allocationSmallholder support
R&D …
Policy contexts & policies across the value chain …
20-Jun-17
7
Some examples of policy success (or not) …Country& ‘success’ score’ (1-5)
Farmers’ tree plantation status
Main reasons Comments
Thailand(3)
Eucalypts for paper mills
Demand/ land/ supply balance
Successful ‘agroforestry’
Lao PDR(1)
Teak in some provinces
Low-input crop for land tenure
Non-marketmotivation
Vietnam(5)
Acacia for many purposes
Best crop for poor lands
Doi moi favouredtree growing
New Zealand(4)
Pine for domestic& export markets
Market demand & competition
Flux between ag. & forestry
Australia(1)
Mostly marginal to markets
Poor policy design
Boom then bust
SummarySuccessful policies: encourage (or don’t discourage) tree growing
- trees are just like another agricultural crop
foster markets, minimise transaction costs- just as for other agricultural crops
are smart about processing & exporting- play to strengths and opportunities
20-Jun-17
1
Tree plantations:policy successes & challenges
Peter KanowskiThe Australian National Universitye: [email protected]
SummaryTree plantations are: part of landscapes, enterprises & value chains
- so other policies matter too…
diverse (different forms, scales, purposes)- so policies need to accommodate diversity
relatively long-term investments- so policies need to be stable & robust
Planted forests: a continuum of forms
Source: http://www.fao.org/forestry/plantedforests/67504/enSee: Carle & Holmgren. 2008. Forest Products J 58(12): 6-18, Figure 1
20-Jun-17
2
Tree plantations: a diversity of forms
Luang Prabang, Lao PDR Prachinburi, Thailand - csr.doubleapaper.com/en/khanna_paper.asp
Veracel, Brazil Balsa smallholder, PNG
Tree plantations at different scales
Clockwise from bottom left: Zambia (CIFOR); Da Nang, Vietnam (x3)
Value chains of different character
20-Jun-17
3
Most tree plantation expansion = “fastwood”
McDermott 2012 for FSC, Figure 1 CIFOR 2003
(Intensively-managed) tree plantations
Photo Source: FAO 2010 Planted forests in sustainable forest management
Tree plantations for restoration (too)
Photo: Tony Bartlett
20-Jun-17
4
Tree planations: a history of contest
Photo credits: Philip Adlard; stopgetrees.org/; EJOLT - Vanessa Vilarinho
Tree plantations: continuing debate
www.foei.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/plantaciones-final-ingles.pdf
Tree plantations: principles for the future
theforestsdialogue.org/initiatives/IMPF www.fao.org/forestry/plantedforests/en/
20-Jun-17
5
Tree plantation policy: building blocks
Tree plantations: learning good practice
http://newgenerationplantations.org/en/what/
Tree plantations: principles for the future
Good governance Corporate responsibility
Enabling investment & market-driven Equitable sharing of benefits & costs
A landscape approach Sustainability across scales
20-Jun-17
6
Tree plantations – SME successes
Java - Photo: Tony Bartlett; CIFOR Annual Report 2013
Veracel, Brazil Visy paper mill, Australia
Tree plantations – corporate successes
Policy context 3:
Processing & markets
Industry policiesTrade policies
…
Policy context 2:
Field to processor
Plantation registrationHarvesting permitTransport permit
…
Policy context 1:
Tree growing
Land allocationSmallholder support
R&D …
Policy contexts & policies across the value chain …
20-Jun-17
7
Some examples of policy success (or not) …Country& ‘success’ score’ (1-5)
Farmers’ tree plantation status
Main reasons Comments
Thailand(3)
Eucalypts for paper mills
Demand/ land/ supply balance
Successful ‘agroforestry’
Lao PDR(1)
Teak in some provinces
Low-input crop for land tenure
Non-marketmotivation
Vietnam(5)
Acacia for many purposes
Best crop for poor lands
Doi moi favouredtree growing
New Zealand(4)
Pine for domestic& export markets
Market demand & competition
Flux between ag. & forestry
Australia(1)
Mostly marginal to markets
Poor policy design
Boom then bust
SummarySuccessful policies: encourage (or don’t discourage) tree growing
- trees are just like another agricultural crop
foster markets, minimise transaction costs- just as for other agricultural crops
are smart about processing & exporting- play to strengths and opportunities
Project:
Module
Improving policies for forestplantations to balance smallholder,industry and environmental needsin Lao PDR andVietnam
The supply chain framework as anorganizing framework for policy analysis
Concept of supply chain and value chain
Value chain framework
Forces of collaborative VC thinking
Basic steps in VC analysis
Approaches to VC Analysis
VC related projects for planted wood in Lao PDR
2
3
First figure: Traditional supply chain ―supply push; Second figure: Sustainable value chain ―consumer demand pull (Fearne, 2009).
4
Supply chain strategy Value chain strategy(Collins et al. 2015)
5
VC analysis/management involves four factors (Collins et al. 2015)
VCA can identify opportunities to improve the chain performance.
VCA dimensions: Consumer value; Material flow; Information flow; and Relationships/governance (Collins et al. 2015).
We also use VCA as an organising framework for research
6
7(Dunne and Collins, 2004; Collins, 2009)
Identify knowledge networks Map the chain (inputs, actors/arena/institution, and their roles)
Sampling design Conduct consumer surveys Conduct semi‐structured interview (all chain actors) Organise focus group discussion (or expert workshop) and conduct SWOT analysis
Present key findings to the key stakeholders
8
9
10Causal‐loop diagram of teak furniture business in Indonesia (Purnomo et al., 2009)
Simple (coarse‐scale) approach
Average (medium‐scale) approach
Detailed (fine‐scale) approach
11
Literature review approach: ACIAR project in Laos, Midgley et al. (2012)
SWOT Analysis using “SWOT assistance matrix”: Forest fuel supply chains study in South East Europe, Rouch et al. (2015)
Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach: ACIAR Project in Indonesia, Purnomo (2013)
Systems Thinking (using STELLA Software): Indonesian Teak, Purnomo et al. (2009)
12
A financial analysis of Premium vs productivity: ACIAR project in Vietnam byAidan et.al.
Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach: ACIAR Project in Indonesia byPurnomo (2013)
Systems Thinking (using STELLA Software, Indonesian Teak paper): Teak paperby Purnomo et al. (2009)
13
14
ACIAR (VALTIP2)
ACIAR teak agrof
VC related projects forplanted wood in Lao PDR(adapted from Midgley etal. 2012)
Divide into groups based on the value chain arenas of Establishment andmanagement Harvesting and transport Processing Markets
For each of these identify the Interests; Motivations; Barriers; and Issues
15
16
Interests Rank Motivations Barriers Issues