Project ID 201213-02 Final Report

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 2013

    Final Project Report: Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1

    Prepared For:

    The Town of Pelham

    Prepared By:

    Ground Truth Consultants

    14 June 2013

    Photo by James Climenhage

  • 135 Taylor Road, S.S #4

    Niagara-on-the-lake, ON

    Tel: (647)408-5450

    Email: [email protected]

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    James Lane, Engineering Technologist The Town of Pelham 20 Pelham Town Square Fonthill, ON L0S 1E0 Dear Mr. James Lane: Re: Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 Project Proposal Report Please accept this letter as the official submission of, Ground Truth Consultants Project Final Report for

    the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1, Project ID: 201213-02.

    This is the Final Report for the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 applied thesis project. The attached

    report includes a detailed discussion of the methodologies involved in the creation of, and challenges

    involved with, the four client deliverables Access database, file geodatabase, the online interactive

    web map and a business feasibility study of the adjacent property to the south of the Fonthill Cemetery

    as a possible area of expansion for the cemetery grounds.

    Project Management elements are discussed including total hours and breakdown down structure of the

    seven major tasks involved with this multi-pronged project. The total estimated cost of the project

    originally valued at $151,372.80 has been revised to a final total of $103,170.81. This cost continues to

    include the project team labour costs, advisor wage, travel costs, hardware and software acquisitions,

    incidentals, contingencies and taxes. The project budget has been prepared for learning purposes only

    and the value of this project is being donated by the student consultants, Niagara College and the

    advisory staff.

    The report includes findings and recommendations for the Town of Pelham including a recommended

    layout of the expansion property that mirrors the existing cemetery structure and yields a total of 2194

    individual plots/graves with minimum net revenues of $2,248,850.00 with full capacity.

    Please review this Final Report as it updates the recent changes made to the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping

    Phase 1 applied thesis project. If you have any questions, concerns and or recommendations regarding

    the enclosed document, please feel free to contact me at your convenience at (647)408-5450.

    Sincerely,

    Chris Burland, B.A. Project Manager Ground Truth Consultants CB /

  • 135 Taylor Road, S.S #4

    Niagara-on-the-lake, ON

    Tel: (647)408-5450

    Email: [email protected]

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Enclosures: 1) [Project Final Report: Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1].

    2) Feasibility Report on the Expansion property 3) User guide for the Access Database 4) User Guide for the online interactive web page 5) [Lightscribe DVD disc containing the following:

    Access Database, Fonthill.gdb, Folder of grave photos, html, CSS and javascript coding, ArcMap Layout mxd file

    cc. A.Goodale, GIS Consultant C.LaScala, GIS Consultant J.Lisnyj, GIS Consultant N.Matanga, GIS Consultant J.Finlay, Project Advisor

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 | Final Report i

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Executive Summary

    This final report provides an in-depth overview of the changes made to the goal, objectives, and

    methodologies encompassed in the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Project Phase 1. Currently, the towns

    staff has maintained an antiquated system of database storage, recording all cemetery information

    connected to the sale and ownership of plots in the towns main cemetery in paper log books. The

    Town of Pelham wants to modernize their cemetery database system by digitizing all their cemetery

    records using various up-to-date database and GIS-related techniques.

    The project involved four client-related deliverables a database for the storage of all cemetery

    related information; a file geodatabase used to link the database to the third deliverable, an interactive

    online web portal that provides public access to the cemeterys layout and contents and a business

    feasibility study of possible expansion of the Fonthill Cemetery.

    A database has been designed to handle all of the variations in plot to grave relationships that currently

    exist in the complex and disorganized Fonthill Cemetery layout. The database has been populated with

    the contents of over 150 plots (600 + individual grave records) in the three sections within the scope of

    the project the Hansler, Armitage and Dickson cemetery sections.

    The contents of this database, complete with a series of forms and standard queries, were then

    transferred into a File Geodatabase used to generate an online web page. This page, created using

    Google API and fusion tables, allows any member of the public to search the cemetery for any names of

    persons buried. A search result provides the geographical location of the grave, as well as a photo of the

    gravestone and some pertinent data regarding individual internments.

    The original projected budget for the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 Project had a total cost of

    $151,372.80 (including taxes). The final budget for the project was $103,170.81 (including taxes).

    Ground Truth Consultants were able to bring this project in 22% under budget. The main reason for this

    savings was due to the overestimation of the labour required to complete several of the main goals.

    One of the key findings of this project involved the need for a multi-layer ID system required in the

    database design. This was necessary in order to accommodate the number and range of different

    relationships between plots and persons buried. The organization of each section differs at the plot and

    grave level with Hansler and Armitage each having the capacity for eight persons per plot. Also, missing

    and inaccurate data existed in the old records, the AutoCAD map and the actual grave markers.

    The business feasibility study provided some differing results based on the criteria placed on the

    findings. The report includes three different alternatives for the organizational plan for the adjacent

    property a plan that extends the existing cemetery structure into the annexed area; a maximized

    spacing with a minimization of path and roadways; and a middle ground that included smaller but

    usable paths. This option will provide the Town of Pelham a minimum of $2,248,850.00 with full brial

    capacity.

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report ii

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Table of Contents

    Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i

    Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... ii

    List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................... iii

    List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ iv

    List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................................ iv

    1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1

    1.1 Project Overview ........................................................................................................................... 1

    1.1.1 Client Overview ..................................................................................................................... 1

    1.1.2 Project Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1

    1.1.3 Project Goal ........................................................................................................................... 1

    1.1.4 Primary Project Objectives .................................................................................................... 1

    1.1.5 Project Study Area and Scope ............................................................................................... 2

    1.1.6 Deliverables ........................................................................................................................... 3

    2.0 Literature Review .............................................................................................................................. 3

    2.1 Problem Formulation .................................................................................................................... 3

    2.2 Literature Search ........................................................................................................................... 4

    2.3 Literature/Data Evaluation ........................................................................................................... 4

    2.3.1 Town of Pensacola, FL ........................................................................................................... 4

    2.3.2 City of Niagara Falls, ON ........................................................................................................ 4

    2.3.3 City of Brandon, MB .............................................................................................................. 5

    2.3.4 City of Stratford, ON.............................................................................................................. 6

    3.0 Provided Data.................................................................................................................................... 8

    3.1 Original Paper Records .................................................................................................................. 8

    3.2 AutoCAD Drawing ......................................................................................................................... 8

    4.0 Project Resources .............................................................................................................................. 9

    5.0 Client Deliverables .......................................................................................................................... 11

    5.1 Access Database .......................................................................................................................... 11

    5.1.1 Photo Capture ..................................................................................................................... 11

    5.1.2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 11

    5.1.3 Challenges ........................................................................................................................... 12

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report iii

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    5.2 File Geodatabase......................................................................................................................... 13

    5.2.1 Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 13

    5.2.2 Challenges ........................................................................................................................... 14

    5.3 Online Interactive Cemetery Map .............................................................................................. 15

    5.3.1 Survey .................................................................................................................................. 15

    5.3.2 Online Interactive Map ....................................................................................................... 16

    5.3.4 Challenges ........................................................................................................................... 26

    5.4 Future Cemetery Expansion Study .............................................................................................. 27

    6.0 Project Management ..................................................................................................................... 30

    6.1 Final Project Schedule ................................................................................................................ 30

    6.2 Final Project Working Hours ...................................................................................................... 30

    6.3 Labour Costs ............................................................................................................................... 33

    6.3.1 Final Labour Costs Breakdown ............................................................................................ 33

    6.4 Final Project Budget ................................................................................................................... 34

    6.5 Earn Value Management ............................................................................................................ 35

    7.0 Findings ........................................................................................................................................... 37

    8.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................... 38

    9.0 Works Cited ..................................................................................................................................... 40

    List of Figures

    Figure 1: The study area for the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Project Phase 1 including expansion area .... 2

    Figure 2: A search of A. Smith on the Fairview Cemetery using the Niagara Falls cemetery website ......... 5

    Figure 3: The online interactive cemetery search map for the Brandon MB cemetery ............................... 6

    Figure 4: The online web page representing the Stratford, ON Cemetery ................................................... 7

    Figure 5: An example of the original paper record for Hansler plot # 45 with lists of grave owners and

    persons buried. ............................................................................................................................................. 8

    Figure 6: A close-up view of the AutoCAD drawing illustrating the plots, owners and subsections for a

    portion of Hansler ......................................................................................................................................... 9

    Figure 7: The relationships for the final access database structure ........................................................... 11

    Figure 8: The structure of the original file geodatabase designed in ArcDiagrammer ............................... 13

    Figure 9: The ArcDiagrammer illustration of the current file geodatabase for the Fonthill Cemetery ...... 14

    Figure 10: Screenshot of customized Interactive Online Website.............................................................. 26

    Figure 11: The Fonthill Cemetery study area with the proposed expansion study area included ............. 28

    Figure 12: Design of Layout Option 1 recommended by Ground Truth Consultants ................................ 29

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report iv

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Figure 13: Visual Comparison of Proposed vs. Actual Project Total Working Hours .................................. 32

    Figure 14: An illustration of the Final Budget Breakdown for the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Project

    Phase 1 ........................................................................................................................................................ 35

    Figure 15: EVM breakdown of the comparison of Planned Value of this project to Earned and Actual

    Value ........................................................................................................................................................... 37

    List of Tables

    Table 1: Final Project Deliverables ................................................................................................................ 3

    Table 2: Complete list of all resources used during the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Project Phase 1 ....... 10

    Table 3: Water Stations Fusion Table Symbology Parameters ................................................................... 18

    Table 4: Garbage Cans Fusion Table Symbology Parameters ..................................................................... 19

    Table 5: Persons Buried Fusion Table Symbology Parameters ................................................................... 20

    Table 6: Cemetery Sections Fusion Table Symbology Parameters ............................................................. 21

    Table 7: Customized Symbology for All Fusion Tables ................................................................................ 21

    Table 8: Head_Stone_Photo Column Parameters ...................................................................................... 23

    Table 9: Customized Info Windows for All Fusion Tables ........................................................................... 24

    Table 10: Timelines for all of the major project tasks for the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Project Phase 1

    .................................................................................................................................................................... 30

    Table 11: Comparison Proposed to Actual work required to complete Major Project Tasks .................... 31

    Table 12: A complete breakdown of all of the labour cost associated with this project ........................... 33

    Table 13: A comparison of the proposed and final costs of all of the major expenditures related to the

    Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Project Phase 1 .............................................................................................. 34

    Table 14: A breakdown and evaluation of the Earn Value Management changes through the life of the

    project ......................................................................................................................................................... 36

    List of Appendices

    Appendix A (Terms of Reference) Appendix B (Project Overview Statement) Appendix C (WBS) Appendix D (Gantt Chart) Appendix E (CD Structure)

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 | Final Report 1

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0

    June 14, 2013

    1.0 Introduction

    1.1 Project Overview

    1.1.1 Client Overview

    The Town of Pelham is located in the centre of the Regional Municipality of Niagara. The municipality

    was formed with the creation of the Regional Municipality of Niagara in 1970 (History of Niagara Region,

    2009). Five smaller communities Fonthill, Ridgeville, Effingham, North Pelham and Fenwick were

    amalgamated into a single town covering 126.42 square kilometres (Welcome to the Town of Pelham,

    2013). The Town of Pelham operates two active cemeteries in Hillside Cemetery located in Ridgeville

    and the Fonthill Cemetery located in the centre of Fonthill, ON (Town of Pelham Cemeteries, 2012).

    Representing the Town of Pelhams interests in this project is James Lane, Engineering Technologist.

    1.1.2 Project Purpose

    Recently, the town has implemented two extensive organizing initiatives the Municipal Cultural

    Master Plan and the Cultural Assets Mapping Plan (Recreation, Culture & Wellness, 2012). As part of

    this plan, Pelham wishes to modernize their cemetery record-keeping and provide the cemetery

    information a distinctive web presence.

    1.1.3 Project Goal

    The goal of the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 project involved the digitally cataloguing cemetery

    plots for the Town of Pelham.

    1.1.4 Primary Project Objectives

    Three key objectives supported the plan to preserve the towns rich heritage. The initial objective was

    the digitization of all cemetery plots within the Dickson, Armitage and Hansler sections of the cemetery.

    A geodatabase containing both spatial coordinates and extensive attribute data was created and

    populated with a sample of the total records. The second objective involved the creation of an online

    interactive map of the cemetery plots including help and search functions. The final objective dealt with

    the completion of a land survey of an adjacent property in order to assess the business feasibility of

    expanding the current cemetery.

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 2

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    1.1.5 Project Study Area and Scope

    While the client operates two cemeteries, this project focused on the Fonthill Cemetery. Within that

    cemetery, the scope of this project encompassed three of the five sections Hansler, Armitage and

    Dickson (see Figure 1 below).

    Figure 1: The study area for the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Project Phase 1 including expansion area

    The scope of the data entry covers a sample of 50 plots from each of the three cemetery sections within

    the study area involving over 600 individual interred persons. The purpose of the sample of data was for

    testing the three connective deliverables; the database, File Geodatabase and Interactive online web

    map.

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 3

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    1.1.6 Deliverables

    Table 1 lists the deliverables that are presented to the client at the completion of the project.

    Table 1: Final Project Deliverables

    2.0 Literature Review

    In recent years, cities have begun to adapt to modernization by experimenting with web development

    projects for their cemeteries. With the following cities websites as a template, Ground Truth

    Consultants has standardized and simplified data entry while maintaining user functionality through the

    website development.

    2.1 Problem Formulation The Town of Pelham has recently implemented a Municipal Cultural Master Plan and Cultural Assets

    Mapping Plan to aid in the preservation of its heritage. One of the Towns main goals involves the

    updating of its cemetery record storage. With the implementation of an integrated database system

    record-keeping methods become more efficient, secure, and accurate.

    Along with the creation of a new digitizing data process, the town wanted to improve access to this

    newly digitized information. This secondary objective was accomplished with the development of a web

    based GIS application for the clients cemetery data.

    Deliverables Description

    Database Database file built using Microsoft Access 2010

    File Geodatabase File geodatabase consisting of feature datasets that represent raw survey points, each of the three expansion study templates, as well as the feature classes representing the physical elements associated with the existing cemetery

    Database User Guide Outlines standards and procedures for data entry in the Access database

    Interactive Online Map and Web page

    Features four layers, with search function capabilities for finding first, last or combined information on persons interred in the cemetery

    Online Web User Guide Step-by-step guide to transferring data records from the File Geodatabase to the interactive map

    Business Feasibility Study Three templates for the potential layout of the adjacent property plus a recommendation for the option choice

    Final Report Documentation of methodology, challenges, recommendations, references, and benefits for the client

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 4

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    2.2 Literature Search

    Sources used for the literature review include:

    City of Niagara Falls

    City of Brandon, Manitoba

    Town of Stratford, ON

    Town of Pensacola, Florida

    2.3 Literature/Data Evaluation

    The following section discusses the contributions of each of the above resources and how they aided in

    successfully preserving the heritage of the Town of Pelham. By reviewing scholarly articles and

    previously completed projects, Ground Truth Consultants were able to create an effective geodatabase

    and accompanying web-application.

    2.3.1 Town of Pensacola, FL

    Dr. Johan Liebens has a PhD in Geography from Michigan State University, specializing in physical

    geography and GIS-based spatial research. He argues that the implementation of accurate maps and

    geodatabases are important for research and are rarely applied to cemeteries in particular. Liebens also

    argues that the combination of increasingly accurate global positioning system receivers and

    improvements in the intuitiveness of GIS software provides historical archaeologists with a unique

    means for both conducting research and presenting information to the public. The benefits of

    combining these technologies include the rapid recording of accurate data, creating of publicly

    accessible and user friendly presentations (interactive maps) and assisting with future research (Liebens,

    2003).

    After examining Dr. Liebens article for the Town of Pensacolas Historic Cemetery, Ground Truth

    Consultants were able to create a methodology for collecting, recording, processing and displaying data

    for the Town of Pelhams Cemetery.

    2.3.2 City of Niagara Falls, ON

    The City of Niagara Falls cemetery website offers a section on fees and services, bylaws and guidelines,

    locations and history, genealogy search and a family history book. Users are able to enter their name,

    cemetery of choice, section or plot to perform a cemetery, or columbarium, search. The database

    performs partial matches on the last name and first name fields. Families can look up burial information

    on their ancestors or their own family plot. Detailed information about the location, section and plot

    number, date of burial and a photo of the monument can be easily accessed.

    After examining the City of Niagara Falls, Ontarios website it was evident that it was a very basic

    application that involved a lot of user input with little results. The overall map product is static and

    there are not very many search capabilities. The geodatabase connected to the website has a good

    functionality (i.e. attribute table) and this is something Ground Truth Consultants has incorporated into

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 5

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    the web-application (Niagara Falls Cemeteries). Figure 2 illustrates the Niagara Falls online cemetery

    website.

    Figure 2: A search of A. Smith on the Fairview Cemetery using the Niagara Falls cemetery website

    2.3.3 City of Brandon, MB

    The City of Brandon, Manitoba has a website that provides users with an interactive online cemetery

    map. The web-portal provides site visitors with the ability to scroll around the digitized cemetery and

    locate specific sections, plots and subplots if they know where a person is located. If this information is

    unknown, the extensive search engine allows the user to locate the person.

    Advantages

    Easy to navigate through the map

    Interactive click allows for information on section, block, plot, subplot, date of birth and death,

    place of birth and death, first and last name

    Extensive search capabilities that allow for search of first name, last name, place of birth and

    death

    o This is very useful if the user is searching and doesnt have all of the information; the

    search tool allows the user to scroll through the results.

    Well organized sections, plots and subplot sections

    Pictures of headstones provide user with a visual representation of the actual grave

    Orthoimage provides real world context to the overlaid vector file

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 6

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Disadvantages

    Some entries have missing information such as headstone picture

    Incorrect information (Date of birth and date of death are the same)

    After examining the City of Brandon, Manitobas Cemetery website, it is evident that this is an excellent

    model for the Town of Pelhams cemetery web-application. This website was ideal in the areas of

    navigation, organization and general visual appeal. Orthoimagery is used as a base for the map and this

    makes it very realistic. The application also offers extensive search capabilities which utilize all aspects

    of the connecting geodatabase. These features are something that Ground Truth Consultants has

    incorporated and elaborated on with their interactive map (Brandon Cemetery Search). The Brandon

    Cemetery web page is illustrated Figure 3 below.

    Figure 3: The online interactive cemetery search map for the Brandon MB cemetery

    2.3.4 City of Stratford, ON

    The City of Stratfords online map prompts the user to enter the name of the person that they are

    looking for. The search capabilities are limited as they do not allow for the user to enter other

    information such as place of birth, birth or death date and location (section, subsection). Once the

    intended person has been located the search results only yield the cemetery name, section, grave

    number and name within a table. There is a link to a static map showing the various sections of the

    cemetery. There is no interactive aspect to this cemetery website. This makes the location of an

    individual very difficult.

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 7

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Advantages

    Simple search capabilities restrict data overload for the user

    Adequate data provided about the dead person; Death date, name and section of cemetery

    Disadvantages

    Map is static, which doesnt allow the user to find the exact location of the grave, just the

    section number

    The data provided could be more extensive (place of death, birth, if grave is active/not active)

    Data is static, doesnt let the user know if there are two people within the plot (husband and

    wife) only the person searched is brought up in the results

    Search provides grave number but this information is irrelevant as the map link provided only

    shows the section number. The location of the grave number is left up to the interpretation of

    the user

    The Stratford Cemeterys static web map is illustrated in Figure 4 below.

    Figure 4: The online web page representing the Stratford, ON Cemetery

    After a thorough examination of the advantages of disadvantages with this citys online cemetery

    mapping application, there are significant functional difficulties with this website. A static map was not

    ideal for the Town of Pelhams web-application as it was not intuitive enough from a user perspective.

    The lack of search capabilities also hinders the functionality of the website as a whole. Overall, this

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 8

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    website application does not effectively fulfill the objective of public access to the Town of Pelham

    cemetery data (Stratford Cemetery).

    3.0 Provided Data

    3.1 Original Paper Records The main set of data provided came in the form of PDF scans of individual plot records listing the names

    and addresses of the purchasers of plots or portions of plots, the purchase prices of the plots, as well as

    the names, death and burial dates of the interred. Each PDF represented one full plot. An example of a

    plot PDF is illustrated in Figure 5 below.

    Figure 5: An example of the original paper record for Hansler plot # 45 with lists of grave owners and persons buried.

    This record represents Plot 45 in the Hansler section. The plot owners are listed on the left and the

    names of persons buried are listed on the right. Other information that is listed include the address of

    the owner, the death date, burial date and age of the deceased and the purchase cost of plot.

    3.2 AutoCAD Drawing

    The other main piece of provided data was an AutoCAD drawing that featured all of the plot numbers

    and names of the individual grave purchasers/owners. A close up of the Hansler section of the Fonthill

    Cemetery is illustrated in Figure 6 below.

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 9

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Figure 6: A close-up view of the AutoCAD drawing illustrating the plots, owners and subsections for a portion of Hansler

    The attribute layer consists of the plot owners (in purple). The green polylines indicate the divisions

    between adjacent graves, the aqua numbers indicate the plots numbers and the white polygons indicate

    plot divisions. The large red numbers represent the individual sections within a single plot. But the

    numbers in Figure 6 (above) illustrate that the numbers provide no reference numbering for the Hansler

    Section of the Fonthill Cemetery, as they do in both Armitage and Dickson. This may be due to the fact

    that Hansler sub-plot numbering system divides plot into an east and west sections depending on the

    geographic location within an individual plot. The east side numbering system of 1E, 2E, 3E and 4E and

    the west half is 1W, 2W, 3W and 4W. This unique numbering system in this cemetery section needed to

    be taken into consideration when designing the database system.

    4.0 Project Resources

    Table 2 (below) lists all of the resources required to complete this project.

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 10

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Table 2: Complete list of all resources used during the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Project Phase 1

    Resource Type Resource Name Description/Function/Source

    Personnel Chris Burland Project Manager

    Andy Goodale GIS Consultant

    Carly La Scala GIS Consultant

    Justyna Lisnyj GIS Consultant

    Nohbule Matanga GIS Consultant

    Janet Finlay Project Advisor

    James Lane Representative of the Client

    Hardware Nikon DTM-332 Provided by Niagara College

    Dell OptiPlex 960 Desktop Computer

    Provided by Niagara College

    Digital Camera Provided by the Client

    Software ArcGIS 10.0 for Desktop

    Comprehensive GIS mapping software, database storage system, provided by Niagara College

    Microsoft Access 2010

    Comprehensive relational database system, provided by Niagara College

    Google Maps API Free open source software provided by Google

    Microsoft Excel 2010 Conversion software between File Geodatabase and Google Fusion tables, provided by Niagara College

    Data Excel spreadsheets Contained the cemetery burial information, provided by the client

    Fonthill paper records

    Contained owner and burial information based on central plot number, supplied in PDF form, provided by the client

    Digital Images Containing images of Fonthill Cemetery Plots, provided by the client

    Aerial/Orthoimagery SWOOP 2006 Mr. Sid Images of cemetery, provided by Niagara College

    UTM Coordinates Surveyed by Ground Truth Consultants

    Paper Blueprint Detailed map of the Fonthill Cemeterys plot purchasers, provided by the client

    AutoCAD File Detailed multi-layered AutoCAD file of the plot purchasers and plot configuration of the Fonthill Cemetery, provided by the client

    Headstone and Footstone Images

    Collected by Ground Truth Consultants

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 11

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    5.0 Client Deliverables

    5.1 Access Database

    5.1.1 Photo Capture

    In order to systematically verify the data recorded in the cemetery ledgers provided in portable

    document format (PDF), an initial photo capture was required. Team members spent some time

    collecting a sample of images of the head stones and footstones. Initially, these images were used to

    verify the accuracy of the data recorded in the cemetery paper records. The photos were later cropped

    and stored in the access database.

    5.1.2 Methodology

    In the original project proposal, the Ground Truth team created a complex database structure that

    separated the three sections of the Fonthill Cemetery within the scope of the project into three

    different tables. Numerous identification numbers were used to track plots, graves and interred

    persons within each section.

    After beta testing, it became apparent that the database was not practical and did not function

    seamlessly. As a result, a final database design was created. The current Access database consists only

    of three tables with various IDs created to serve a specific purpose (Lisnyj, 2013, pp. 7-11). The

    connections between the three tables run through a series of one-to-many relationships (see Figure 7

    below).

    Figure 7: The relationships for the final access database structure

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 12

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    The Access database has a form and masks to structure the accuracy of future data entry. A user guide

    has been written detailing the requirements and specifications of each of the text boxes within the

    form. A step-by-step guide to proper form data entry can be found on pages 7-11 within the Database

    Help Guide.

    5.1.3 Challenges

    Data entry was a large component of this project. It is the act of transferring data from the physical,

    antiquated state into a digital state. During this process, Ground Truth Consultants encountered various

    challenges.

    Photo Collection

    Photo collection was hindered due to poor weather, trees and foliage. Some gravestones were covered

    in snow or obscured by trees and shrub foliage. Others had ceremonial wreaths obscuring the photo

    taking. In some cases, the names were difficult to read and snow was needed to aid in the legibility of

    the stone engraving.

    Data Inconsistencies

    Without proper guidelines put in place for the data and having multiple people complete the entry,

    there were small errors in regard to naming conventions (abbreviations for first and last names, address

    abbreviations, etc). The data on the PDFs was also interpreted differently by members of the group and

    difficult to read. This led to errors in dates, names and ages in both the purchase table and persons

    buried table. Lack of data in these PDFs also hindered the amount of information we were able to

    include in the database. For example, many plot owners addresses were not recorded. The actual

    Cemetery purchaser map isnt always consistent with the sections in the real world. This led to delays in

    the entry due to cross validation and taking trips into the field to verify the correct information. Some

    people were also buried with no head stone, so it was difficult to track them down and figure out where

    they were situated in the plot structure.

    Database Functionality

    The actual design of the initial database form caused some problems with the data entry. The beta

    testing and preliminary data entry samples allowed Ground Truth Consultants to create a final working

    form that is fast and reliable. The initial problems encountered were speed of entry, input masking

    errors, incorrect tabbing order and ineffective organization of data on the form. To fix these errors, the

    fields on the form were organized properly; input masks were altered to automatically format words

    where applicable, tabbing order was altered to go in chronological order. All changes have increased

    the speed and efficiency of data entry.

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 13

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    5.2 File Geodatabase

    5.2.1 Methodology

    Once the access database was populated with all of the sample data extracted from the original paper

    records and cross-referenced with the information collected during the image capture of head and foot

    stones, all of the contents were then transferred to the file geodatabase, where cemetery plot

    information was tagged to include spatial referencing.

    The initial version of the file geodatabase consisted of a series of individual feature classes that

    represented all of the elements found in the Fonthill Cemetery. There were tables representing

    cemetery sections, while boundaries, plots, graves, as well as other cemetery features were represented

    by feature classes with a series of subtypes and domains developed structure the content of the feature

    classes. The structure of the file geodatabase is illustrated in Figure 8 (below).

    Figure 8: The structure of the original file geodatabase designed in ArcDiagrammer

    This structure was discarded and a simplified file Geodatabase was adopted. Subtypes and domains and

    relationships were deemed unnecessary because of the restriction placed on the initial data entries

    made in Microsoft Access. Rather than set restrictions on data at this juncture of the data

    transformation, limits on data content were established in the Access database by the use of

    relationship rules and input masks. This made the use of subtypes and domains in the file geodatabase

    both redundant and impractical. This original single feature data set, which contained many different

    feature classes representing the various features in the cemetery failed to provide a well-structured and

    organized option, especially for the steps required in the transformation of data into the interactive

    online map.

    It was also concluded that more organization needed to be established in the file Geodatabase in the

    form of several specific functional feature data sets. These data sets divided the feature classes into

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 14

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    particular aspects pertaining to the different deliverables of the project. These feature data sets

    include; survey raw data, the three different expansion study proposals, the Fonthill cemetery features

    and cemetery data IDs. Within each of these data sets there is a selection of point and polygon features

    that are correlated. The table representing persons buried imported from the Access Database, is also

    included in this file geodatabase. Subsequently by adding organization through the use of multiple

    feature data sets, the file Geodatabase became more simplified. The structure of the finished file

    geodatabase is illustrated using ArcDiagrammer in Figure 9 below.

    Figure 9: The ArcDiagrammer illustration of the current file geodatabase for the Fonthill Cemetery

    5.2.2 Challenges

    Problems Aligning Plots Features

    The Town provided Ground Truth Consultants with AutoCAD drawings of the study area. The plot data,

    provided by the Town of Pelham (see Figure 6 pg. 8) required substantial cleanup measures. Many of

    the polylines demarcating plot features were not closed, which led to difficulties when importing the

    AutoCAD drawing into ArcMap and converting these features into a proper polygon feature class. Using

    the drawing cleanup tools within AutoCAD Map 2D 2012 proved to be unsuccessful in closing most of

    these polylines.

    As a response to this challenge, ArcMap was used to edit this input mainly due to the fact that this

    program was more familiar to the project team. Any unclosed polygons were edited individually, which

    was a time-consuming process. Once edits completed the task of creating recognizable polygons, the

    drawing was converted using the tool feature class to a feature class and then housed in a temporary

    GDB. The new feature class was georeferenced using both an imported basemap and the surveyed

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 15

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    points collected during the original survey of the Fonthill cemetery. (This survey is discussed later in

    section 6.3.1.)

    Some of the projected plots feature class failed to align with the graves images illustrated in either the

    base map or projected orthoimages supplied by the GIS department of Niagara College. The plot

    feature class overlapped onto adjacent roads within the cemetery. With this projection inconsistency,

    an adjustment in the alignment of plot polygons with the related features of the imagery was required.

    This was accomplished by manually shifting plots to align their respective graves. High resolution

    images were required to accurately attach the proper plot borders with the grave plots, so that the

    gravestones can be identified and matched to representative vector plots.

    Assigning Grave IDs

    Unique Identifiers (IDs) were assigned to each polygon attached to the GravesID feature class. These

    features were then converted into a point feature class representing individual persons buried features.

    These features, imported from the Access database, were then linked to the feature class based on

    similar IDs. The challenge involved finding a way to automate this process. Dr. James Jiang was

    consulted on this procedure and he recommended the idea of using VBA script to create a button that

    would complete this task (Jiang, 2013). Theoretically through the click of a button each of the polygons

    would be assigned a unique ID. The major issue with this copying option involved the irregular

    numbering scheme designed for individual cemetery plots. For example, plot numbers may ascend

    sequentially but then jump 10 digits (as happened in Hansler) when plot number 42 is followed by 53.

    The VBA script available for automating this task couldnt effectively take this numbering structure into

    account. Thus, an automatic re-numbering method was discarded.

    The entry of over 4500 unique IDs could only be finished manually. This took an arduous amount of

    time and required stringent quality control measures. These controls included examining the data

    entered every block or row, which equated to roughly every 50 plots. After each data entry, a review of

    each ID was required by scrolling through each record to ensure that there were no errors in the

    numbering schema. This was an important task because if the Access database table, being joined to

    the feature class, had differing ID numbers and the same geographic coordinates, then proper data

    identification difficulties would occur. In order to detect positional errors, it would be necessary to sort

    through many records/rows to determine each mistake.

    5.3 Online Interactive Cemetery Map

    5.3.1 Survey

    A Total Station survey was conducted on the three sections of the Fonthill Cemetery. There were two

    main problems that hindered the surveys final results.

    The first problem was that the team had no access to an accurate elevation point which could be used

    to collect the elevation of all of the surveyed points (x,y) in the cemetery. The elevation points are an

    integral part of operating the Total Station surveying unit but seeing that the final output of the survey

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 16

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    did not include a DEM surface, and x,y coordinates were more critical to the final product, an estimation

    of the elevation (Z) values was made. The lack of proper elevation information was solved by using

    Google Earth software data collected from a remote internet connection. Two recognizable points in

    the cemetery were used as the first set of occupied point (OP) and backsight (BS) points for the Total

    station survey.

    The second difficulty encountered by the survey team was the terrain of the cemetery. The changing

    terrain of the cemetery obstructed shots from the total station to the rod prism. In addition, trees,

    bushes, taller gravestones and the mausoleum also played a role in obstructing the view from several

    different parts of the cemetery.

    5.3.2 Online Interactive Map

    The end product of all the data collection, data entry and data merging, culminates with the interactive

    online map. This component of the project displays selected attribute data on a person buried as well as

    the exact location of the grave.

    Google Fusion Tables and Google Maps API

    For our interactive map we chose Google Fusion Tables and Google Maps API to house it. Google Fusion

    Tables are a data warehouse option that allows users to map spatially referenced data within a specific

    table (Google Fusion Tables API, 2012). We have chosen this for our method of mapping for several

    reasons. The first reason is that it is a free resource. Other options such as ArcGIS Online were explored

    but this route was very expensive and keeping the clients overall needs in mind this option was not

    chosen. Google Maps API and Fusion Tables provide similar mapping options with excellent visual

    representation but without the large price tag.

    A second reason that Fusion Tables was chosen was the maximum allowable capacity for tiles being

    imported into the database. Fusion Tables allows for 250 MB of storage for a single user. This large

    amount of space is needed for a project of this magnitude as there are a significant number of persons

    buried (records) as well as associated photos of the headstones. The final reason was the large amount

    of help resources available to the consulting team. The online resources available included user

    manuals, video tutorials and step by step examples. All of these helped guide the team through the

    various stages of the creating a Fusion Table as well as adding search functions, multiple layers, legends

    and stylization of the overall map. In addition to these online resources, a presentation provided to the

    GIS-GM class by Gregg Bowie provided Ground Truth Consultants with the initial inspiration and

    information as to how spatially referenced data (such as graves) could be represented in Google Maps

    (Bowie, 2011). The presentation along with the tutorials conducted in Dr. James Jiangs GIS Internet

    Mapping course greatly influenced our selection of Google Fusion Tables and Google Maps API.

    The stages involved that lead to the final product were very intensive and require varying levels of both

    GIS related software experience as well as Microsoft Excel and Google Fusion tables. The methodologies

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 17

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    outlined below provide a brief overview of how Ground Truth Consultants reached the completed online

    map. A detailed manual regarding the step-by-step procedures involved in this deliverable was provided

    to the client.

    Attaching Microsoft Access Attribute Data to ArcMap Feature Classes The first step of the process required the attachment of attribute data from Microsoft Access by using

    ArcMap. By using the database connection function, the persons buried table joined to the persons

    buried point feature class using the import tool. This step connected the attribute data of a specific

    person buried to an exact and accurate location within the Fonthill Cemetery, which was quite critical as

    it formed the basis for the remaining steps involved in the online interactive map. If data entry errors

    exist then this information will fail to be joined correctly which hinders the overall accuracy and

    effectiveness of final online map search results. Extensive quality assurance measures were taken to

    ensure the sample of records matched with the number of persons buried points in ArcMap. This

    involved a thorough understanding of the numbering schema (persons buried IDs) and cross referencing

    between the table in Access as well as the point feature class in ArcMap. Alert functions during the

    process of joining these two helped reveal potential problems with this join.

    Creating Fusion Tables from ArcMap Files Upon successful completion of the join within ArcMap, the table was exported to Microsoft Excel, as a

    txt file, for further processing and transfer. This stage was conducted for two reasons. The first step

    involved the creation of a new field that was required in this newly exported table. This field was called

    Full Name. It was needed for the search function within the online map as this simplified the querying

    process by allowing the user to search either first or last name. This task is conducted in Excel where

    automatic concatenation through the use of a simple equation is a built-in Excel function. The second

    reason Excel is used as an intermediary step involves its outputting potential. An exported table can be

    saved as an Excel spreadsheet with an xls file extension. This transformation is necessary as Google

    fusion tables only recognize a select variety of files including but not limited to txt, csv, excel files and

    kml. The xls file previously mentioned was used to create the Persons Buried Fusion Table.

    Three other feature classes (waste water, garbage bin and cemetery sections) were converted into KML

    files and used to create the waste water, garbage bin and cemetery sections fusion tables. The sections

    table will serve as a secondary layer in the final map and provides navigational services for newcomers

    or users interested in the layout of the cemetery. The garbage cans and water stations also provide

    secondary information to the user as these features on the map provide helpful locational information.

    Maps were created from the four fusion tables using the Map of Geometry Functionality (Blake, Excel

    and mapping points with Google Fusion Tables, 2013) and (Blake, Excel and mapping polygons, 2013).

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 18

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Modifying Placemark Icon Symbology in Google Fusion Tables

    Once the fusion tables were created and mapped, the placemark icon symbology was changed using the Change Map Style functionality. There were three different methodologies used to symbolize the layers in our online map: symbology specific icon name, fixed symbology and symbology by numerical column range. The symbology by specific icon name was used for the Water Stations and Garbage Bins Fusion Tables using the parameters outlined in both Table 3 and Table 4. Table 3: Water Stations Fusion Table Symbology Parameters

    Water Stations Fusion Table Symbology Parameters

    Parameter Settings Figure

    Points Marker Icon

    Map Marker Icons Column

    Use Icon Specified in Column

    On

    Icon Column Type: Text

    Format: None

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 19

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Table 4: Garbage Cans Fusion Table Symbology Parameters

    Garbage Cans Fusion Table Symbology Parameters

    Parameter Settings Figure

    Points Marker Icon

    Map Marker Icons Column

    Use Icon Specified in Column

    On

    Icon Column Type: Text

    Format: None

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 20

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    For the Persons Buried Fusion Table the fixed symbology method was applied using the parameters

    outlined in Table 5.

    Table 5: Persons Buried Fusion Table Symbology Parameters

    Persons Buried Fusion table Symbology Parameters

    Parameter Settings Figure

    Points Marker Icon

    Map Marker Icons Fixed

    Use one Icon On

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 21

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    For the Cemetery Sections Fusion Table the symbology by numerical column range method was applied

    using the parameters outlined in Table 6.

    Table 6: Cemetery Sections Fusion Table Symbology Parameters

    Once the parameters were applied and saved to the fusion table the placemark icon symbology changes

    appeared in the individual maps Table 7.

    Cemetery Sections Fusion Table Symbology Parameters

    Parameter Settings Figure

    Polygons Fill Color

    Polygon Background Colors Gradient

    Show a Gradient On

    Code Column Type: Number

    Format: None

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 22

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Table 7: Customized Symbology for All Fusion Tables

    Customized Symbology For All Fusion Tables

    Water Stations Fusion Table Garbage Cans Fusion Table

    Persons Buried Fusion Table Cemetery Sections Fusion Table

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 23

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Displaying Photos in Google Fusion Table A Picasa Web Albums account was created for the client in order to host all of the cemetery photos.

    URL links were obtained through Picasa Web Albums and manually added to each row in the fusion

    table Head_Stone_Photo column (Google Picasa Web Albums, 2013).

    In order for the URL links to display as images the Head_Stone_Photo column was reformatted to meet

    the following parameter, which is illustrated in Table 8 below.

    Table 8: Head_Stone_Photo Column Parameters

    Head_Stone_Photo Column Parameters

    Parameter Settings Figure

    Column Name Head_Stone_Photo

    Type Text

    Format Eight line Image

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 24

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Customizing the Info Window Layout in Google Fusion Tables

    The info windows for the fusion tables were customized using the change info window layout

    functionality and HTML. Table 9 displays the customized info window layouts for the four fusion tables.

    Table 9: Customized Info Windows for All Fusion Tables

    Customized Info Windows For All Fusion Tables

    Water Stations Fusion Table Garbage Cans Fusion Table

    Persons Buried Fusion Table Cemetery Sections Fusion Table

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 25

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Displaying Multiple Fusion Tables on One Map

    Once all the necessary data related to each fusion table was correctly formatted the visibility options in

    the sharing settings were set. They were changed to Public on the web using the File-Share-Change

    method. The tables were then published using the Tools- Publish method in order to obtain the HTML

    to embed in website code. These steps ensure that the fusion tables and corresponding maps are

    visible to the public.

    Once all of the HTML to embed in website codes were obtained they were merged together into a

    single map using the fusion table layer wizard application available through Google Fusion Tables

    (Geocode, 2013). The codes were then put into the embed link column then put onto the map by

    clicking the Put layer on Map button. The add layer button was used to add all four fusion table into

    the map. Once the layers were placed in the correct order, a code was generated for this newly created

    map.

    Customizing Generated Code

    Although there are options on the wizard to modify the dimensions of the map and the style of the base

    map as well as to create queries, these fuctionalities are limited. As a result of map design and query

    limitations in the FusionTablesLayer Wizard, these tasks were completed using a source code editor

    (Goodale, 2013). This generated code can be imported into a source code editor and modifed using

    html, css and javascript to the clients satisfcation, for example, to generate a legend and extensive

    search functionality as show in Figure 10 (Schneider, 2013).

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 26

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Figure 10: Screenshot of customized Interactive Online Website

    5.3.4 Challenges When working on the interactive online map and webpage, we encountered four main challenges: data

    transfer complexity, layer limitations, symbology limitations and multiply query restrictions. Any other

    challenges that were encountered are explicitly addressed in the extensive user manual.

    In order to create an online map, the cemetery data had to be transferred between four different

    software programs, in particular: Microsoft Access, Arc Map, Microsoft Excel, and finally Google Fusion

    Tables. As a result, an extensive manual detailing out the procedures involved, was created.

    Google Fusion Tables currently only allows users to map a maximum of five layers on any given map. In

    order to deal with this challenge, we limited our mapped layers to the feature classes that were

    essential to the cemetery search in particular; the persons buried feature class and the cemetery

    sections feature class.

    Google fusion table has a limited icon and colour library; again we dealt with this issue by simplifying the

    overall cartography design of the online map.

    Trying to create multiple queries that refer to a single Fusion table initially proved to be a challenge due

    to the lack of the documentation regarding this specific functionality through Google API. As a result we

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 27

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    consulted one of database/programming instructors Dr. James Jiang who helped us modify the

    JavaScript code to accommodate for multiple searches on the same table (Jiang, 2013).

    5.4 Future Cemetery Expansion Study

    The Future Cemetery Expansion Study was conducted in order to determine the business feasibility of

    the adjacent property to the south of the Fonthill Cemetery. The Town of Pelham was interested in the

    feasibility of expanding the Fonthill Cemetery by acquiring a portion of land that sits to the south of the

    Dickson section of the cemetery. The land is currently owned by the Niagara District School Board and is

    a part of the AK Wigg Public School. Figure 11 (below) Illustrates the location of the area under study

    for the Future Cemetery Expansion Study.

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 28

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Figure 11: The Fonthill Cemetery study area with the proposed expansion study area included

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 29

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    The study provided three structures; an extension of the existing cemetery layout, a minimized spacing

    with greater accessibility and a maximized spacing for optimal plot space (Ground Truth Consultants,

    2013, p. 7). Based on a series of calculations and findings, Ground Truth Consultants were able to

    recommend Template # 1 (see Figure 12 below).

    Figure 12: Design of Layout Option 1 recommended by Ground Truth Consultants

    This layout option provided a balance between the level of accessibility required for the cemeterys

    workers and their machinery and the number of plots available for sale in the new area. This layout

    would allow the Fonthill Cemeterys capacity to increase by approximately 20 percent and provide a

    range of net revenue of between $2.2 and $3.1 million, depending burial date and package (Ground

    Truth Consultants, 2013, p. 7).

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 30

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    6.0 Project Management

    6.1 Final Project Schedule Changes were made to the end date of all the major project tasks with the exception of project

    management, project proposal presentation/report and final project presentation and report as seen in

    Table 10 below in the timeline illustrating the completion times of the major project task.

    Table 10: Timelines for all of the major project tasks for the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Project Phase 1

    6.2 Final Project Working Hours The estimated total hours has decreased since the creation of the final report. Ground Truth Consultants

    have overestimated the time required for all major project tasks with the exception of the interactive

    online map and webpage as well as the property analysis and feasibility study which took more time

    than expected. Overall there has been a net reduction of the total hours from 944.5 hours to

    approximately 800 hours. Table 11 illustrates the decrease in the total hours proposed to complete all

    of the projects tasks.

    Major Project Tasks Proposed Start Date (yyyy/mm/dd)

    Proposed End Date (yyyy/mm/dd)

    Actual Start Date (yyyy/mm/dd)

    Actual End Date (yyyy/mm/dd)

    Project Management 2012-10-05 2013-06-14 2012-10-05 2013-06-14

    Project Proposal Presentation and Report

    2012-10-10 2012-12-11 2012-10-10 2012-12-11

    File Geodatabase 2013-01-07 2013-04-30 2013-01-07 2013-05-30

    Progress Report 2013-01-07 2013-03-21 2013-01-07 2013-03-22

    Interactive Online Map and Webpage

    2013-01-07 2013-04-30 2013-01-07 2013-05-31

    Property Analysis and Feasibility

    2013-04-30 2013-05-14 2013-04-30 2013-05-30

    Final Project Presentation and Report

    2013-05-14 2013-06-14 2013-05-01 2013-06-14

    Overall Project 2012-10-10 2012-10-05 2013-06-14

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 31

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Table 11: Comparison Proposed to Actual work required to complete Major Project Tasks

    There were several reasons for the decrease in the total working hours required to complete the major

    task associated with this project. The time required to create the file geodatabase was grossly

    overestimated. The main reason for this change revolves around the changes made to the content of

    the file geodatabase from the proposal and the final report. The file geodatabase was simplified with

    the elimination of the subtypes and domain restrictions and the creation of multiple data sets.

    On the other hand, there was an even greater time revision for the creation of the online interactive

    map. This major client deliverable took over 100 hours longer to complete. The main reason for this

    underestimation involved the requirement to study the methods surrounding the use of fusion tables

    and the online searches necessary to understand search functions and structural restrictions associated

    with this new online mapping application. Figure 13 illustrates the comparison between the proposed

    total working hours and the actual total working hours.

    Major Project Tasks Proposed Total Working Hours

    Actual Total Working Hours

    Project Management 146.0 Hours 78.7 Hours

    Project Proposal Presentation and Report 100.0 Hours 100.0 Hours

    File Geodatabase 180.0 Hours 96.5 Hours

    Progress Report 90.0 Hours 12.3 Hours

    Interactive Online Map and Webpage 180.0 Hours 286.0 Hours

    Future Cemetery Expansion Study

    48.0 Hours 57.0 Hours

    Final Project Presentation and Report 200.5 Hours 136.5 Hours

    Overall Project 944.5 hours 766.98 hours

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 32

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Figure 13: Visual Comparison of Proposed vs. Actual Project Total Working Hours

    Finally, the largest area of change occurs in the Progress Report where an overestimation of the time

    required for its completion was allotted. Additionally, greater efficiency in data compiling and report

    creation has also significantly decreased the time devoted to such tasks. In the end, the total number of

    working hours required to complete all of the tasks associated with the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping

    Project Phase 1 decreased over 170 hours.

    Project Management

    Project Proposal Presentation and

    Report

    File Geodatabase

    Progress Report

    Interactive Online Map and Webpage

    Future Cemetery Expansion Study

    Final Project Presentation and

    Report

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350Updates to Total Working Hours

    Proposed Total Working Hours Actual Total Working Hours

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 33

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    6.3 Labour Costs

    6.3.1 Final Labour Costs Breakdown

    The labour cost breakdown between all of the project team members is illustrated in Table 12 below.

    Table 12: A complete breakdown of all of the labour cost associated with this project

    Project Team J.Finaly C.Burland A.Goodale N.Matanga J.Lisnyj C.LaScala

    Title Project Advisor

    Project Manager

    GIS Consultants

    Project Management (hours) 3.5 78.65 203.15

    Project Proposal 56 123

    (hours)

    File Geodatabase 0 186.5

    (hours)

    Progress Report 9.33 23.32

    (hours)

    Interactive Online Map and Webpage 45 449

    (hours)

    Property Analysis and Feasibility Study 0 67

    (hours)

    Final Project Report 106.5 56

    (hours)

    Total Working Hours 3.5 295.48 1107.97

    Rate/Hour 150/hr 80/ hr 60/ hr

    Total Cost $525.00 $23,638.40 $66,478.20

    Overall Project Team Cost $90,641.60

    The project advisers costs totaled $525.00 for 3.5 hours of project advising, and the project managers

    costs totaled $23,638.40 for 295.48 hours of project management as well as work on some project

    deliverables. The four GIS consultants costs totaled $66,478.20 for their work on the project

    deliverables totaling 1107.97 hours (approximately 277 hours per consultant) on all of the project

    deliverables. Total cost for the team to complete the tasks was $90,641.60.

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 34

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    6.4 Final Project Budget

    As a result of this decrease in hours and wages, the proposed budget of $151,372.80 has been reduced

    by $48,201.99 to $103,170.81. Additionally the contingency was not required. The breakdown and

    comparison of the proposed to final task costs are illustrated in Table 13 below.

    Table 13: A comparison of the proposed and final costs of all of the major expenditures related to the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Project Phase 1

    Item Description Proposed Costs Updated Costs

    Project Team Costs Labour Costs $117,600.00

    $90,641.60

    Travel Costs (Mileage) Using two company cars at a rate of $0.50/km for 13 trips.

    $460.00

    $460.00

    Incidentals Printing, Binding, Paper, Ink $200.00

    $200.00

    Sub-Total: $118,260.00

    $91,301.60

    Contingency 15% of the sub total before taxes $ 17,739.00

    Not Used

    Ontario Tax HST (.13% ) $ 15,373.80

    $11,869.21

    Total: $151,372.80 $103,170.81

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 35

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Travel Costs (Mileage) $460.00

    Incidentals $200.00

    Ontario Tax $11,869.21

    Project Management 18%

    Project Proposal Presentation and Report

    11%

    File Geodatabase 11%

    Progress Report 2%

    Interactive Online Map and Webpage

    30%

    Future Cemetery Expansion Study

    4%

    Final Project Presentation and Report

    12%

    Project Team Labour

    $90,641.60

    Final Budget Breakdown

    The following graph (Figure 14) shows a breakdown on the final budget as well as the percentage weight

    of each task on the overall Project Team labour costs.

    6.5 Earn Value Management An earned value management evaluation was conducted to summarize our project teams progress and

    efficiency to date. The cost variance and cost performance index indicate that we are currently under

    budget for all tasks completed; while the schedule variance shows that we are on schedule.

    Additionally, the complete performance index based on the aforementioned variance concludes that our

    overall management of the project was efficient. Table 14 illustrates the variations in the final budget

    numbers for the various major tasks associated with this project.

    Figure 14: An illustration of the Final Budget Breakdown for the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Project Phase 1

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 36

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Table 14: A breakdown and evaluation of the Earn Value Management changes through the life of the project

    Name Formula Comment

    Budget At Completion (BAC)

    Before Taxes and Contingency:($118,260.00) After Taxes and Contingency: $151,372.80

    Cumulative PV for whole project

    Cost Variance (CV) ($118,260.00 $91,301.60 ) $151,372.80-$116,866.05

    >0, under budget

    Schedule Variance (SV)

    ($118,260.00 $118,260.00) $151,372.80 -$151,372.80

    =0, on schedule

    Cost Performance Index (CPI)

    ($118,260.00/ $91,301.60 ) $151,372.80/ $116,866.05

    >1, under budget

    To-Complete Performance Index (TCPI)

    ($118,260.00 $118,260.00 ) /($118,260.00 $91,301.60 ) ($151,372.80 -$151,372.80 )/( $151,372.80-$116,866.05)

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 37

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    $0.00

    $20,000.00

    $40,000.00

    $60,000.00

    $80,000.00

    $100,000.00

    $120,000.00

    $140,000.00

    Earn Value Management

    Planned Value(PV) Earned Value (EV) Actual Value (AC)

    The EVM chart illustrated in Figure 15 (below) provides support regarding the final budget figures for

    this project.

    With the Actual Value figures falling below the Earned Value, the Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Project

    Phase 1 came in under budget and on time.

    7.0 Findings

    To minimize all possible errors in data entry, the initial trial entry of 50 plots (consisting of 200 individual

    persons buried) per section has allowed Ground Truth Consultants to be knowledgeable in any possible

    issues the town may come across with data entry. This knowledge has allowed us to develop and

    provide proper support in the form of a user guide. This guide will aid in the areas of naming

    conventions for data, ensuring accuracy by use of headstone picture and cross validation by also

    consulting the PDFs.

    A system was designed to incorporate the complex organization of the cemetery at the grave level. The

    current version has been designed to handle all of the variations in plot-to-grave relationships that

    Figure 15: EVM breakdown of the comparison of Planned Value of this project to Earned and Actual Value

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 38

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    currently exist in the complex and disorganized Fonthill Cemetery layout. For example, although there

    were numerous plots that had no persons interred within them, they still had owners. In addition, each

    cemetery section is designed differently. The older sections were built for eight graves whereas the

    newer section contains plots of four graves.

    The business feasibility study includes three different templates for the layout of the adjacent property.

    The first template seamlessly extends the existing cemetery structure by mirroring the plot and road

    density. The second template is pedestrian friendly with more area allocated to roads and less plot

    space. The third template features maximum plot space and minimal road space. After analyzing these

    three models, Ground Truth Consultants recommend the expansion template that mirrors the existing

    cemetery structure. This option balances accessibility and still provides a total of 2194 individual graves

    ensuring optimum feasibility of the survey site.

    8.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

    The Town of Pelham had a serious need to update their method of record keeping regarding data

    storage of cemetery records. The towns current system was inadequate in meeting the needs of the

    growing town. The old paper records were incomplete, inconsistent and poorly maintained with

    recorded information not corresponding with the contents of the cemetery itself. The town was in need

    of a database system overhaul. It is with this primary objective that Ground Truth Consultants was

    commissioned to digitize the towns cemetery records.

    The team implemented a new robust database system that would ensure greater accuracy of data entry

    as well as introduce both strict data standards to record keeping and improved security and access to

    the data records. The complexities and intricacies of the cemetery layout required a fully-thought out

    database system that took into consideration the various plot layout methods involved within the

    different cemetery sections.

    The project also provided the client with an online web portal that provides the public with access to key

    data for all the interred in the Fonthill Cemetery with a robust built-in search functionality. This service

    provides interested parties the ability to search for the names and dates of death and burial for

    ancestors or extended family branches as part of a larger genealogical exploration.

    The final key goal of this project was the completion of a business feasibility study on an adjacent piece

    of property which the town viewed as a potential area of expansion. The town believed that within a

    few years the cemetery would reach full capacity and with the recent growth of the town over the past

    several decades, there was a need to find more cemetery room for future use. The team surveyed a

    section of the AK Wigg Public School that was deemed suitable for cemetery expansion. Ground Truth

    Consultants developed three templates/layouts aimed at assessing the viability of the property ranging

    from one that maximized the land with a minimum of road access to a layout that provided more access

    than was found in the current cemetery layout. The final compromise between these extremes

    consisted of a template that mirrored the structure of the existing Dickson section of the cemetery. This

    middle ground option was seen as the most prudent alternative.

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 39

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    The feasibility report outlines the total number of plots available with each template, outlines the

    maintenance costs attached to each template and the range of revenue that could be achieved by each

    layout plan based on full capacity. While the cost of the land still has not been accessed, the potential

    minimum net revenue generated from the adjacent property ranges from $2,248,850.00 to

    $3,019,053.70 depending on the level of services provided and the residential status of the purchaser of

    a plot (Ground Truth Consultants, 2013).

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 40

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    9.0 Works Cited

    History of Niagara Region. (2009, January 1). Retrieved May 15, 2013, from Niagara Region: History of

    Niagara Council

    Google Fusion Tables API. (2012, September 19). Retrieved May 25, 2013, from Google Developers. N.p.:

    .

    Recreation, Culture & Wellness. (2012, August). Retrieved May 29, 2013, from Town Of Pelham:

    http://www.pelham.ca/Departments/CommunityInfrastructure/CulturalMasterPlan/tabid/747/

    Default.aspx

    Town of Pelham Cemeteries. (2012, July). Retrieved May 30, 2013, from Town of Pelham:

    http://www.pelham.ca/Departments/CommunityInfrastructure/Cemeteries/tabid/740/Default.

    aspx

    Welcome to the Town of Pelham. (2013, May 25). Retrieved June 3, 2013, from Town of Pelham:

    http://www.pelham.ca/Home/tabid/38/Default.aspx

    Blake, K. (2013, March 21). Excel and mapping points with Google Fusion Tables. Retrieved April 22,

    2013, from Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzwVEph-l8o

    Blake, K. (2013, March 25). Excel and mapping polygons. Retrieved May 2, 2013, from Youtube:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj8AxtuXq7A

    Bowie, G. (2011, June 23). The Citytrees.ca Project. Retrieved April 20, 2013, from City Trees - Ryerson

    University: .

    Brandon Cemetery Search. (n.d.). Retrieved March 5, 2013, from City of Brandon GIS:

    http://gis.brandon.ca/arcgis/flex/cemeterysearch.html

    Geocode. (2013, January 1). Fusion Tables Layer Wizard. Retrieved June 1, 2013, from Geocode.com:

    http://fusion-tables-api-

    samples.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/FusionTablesLayerWizard/src/index.html>

    Goodale, A. (2013). Interactive Online Map and Webpage. Niagara-on-the-Lake: Niagara College GIS.

    Google Picasa Web Albums. (2013). Picasa. Retrieved May 27, 2013, from Google:

    http://picasa.google.com/#utm_medium=embed&utm_source=pwalogin

    Ground Truth Consultants. (2013). Future Cemetery Expansion Study: Fonthill Cemetery . Niagara-on-the-

    Lake: Niagara College.

  • Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1 |Final Report 41

    135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Jiang, D. J. (2013, May 24). Fusion Tables Coding Changes. (A. Goodale, Interviewer)

    Liebens, J. (2003). Map and Database Construction for an Historic Cemetery: Methods and Applications.

    Historical Archeology, 56-68.

    Lisnyj, J. (2013). Help Guide for The Town of Pelham's Cemetery Access Database. Niagara-on-the-Lake:

    Niagara College.

    Niagara Falls Cemeteries. (n.d.). Retrieved March 5, 2013, from Niagara Falls Municipal Works:

    http://www.niagarafalls.ca/city-hall/municipal-works/cemetery/default.asp&xgt;.

    Schneider, V. (2013, April 10). Creating map legends in Google Fusion Tables. Retrieved May 29, 2013,

    from Youtube: .

    Stratford Cemetery. (n.d.). Retrieved March 5, 2013, from City Services:

    http://www.city.stratford.on.ca/site_ourcitylife/city

  • 135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Appendix A (Terms of Reference)

  • 135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

  • 135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Appendix B (Project Overview Statement)

  • 135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

  • 135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

  • 135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

  • 135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

  • 135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0

    June 14, 2013

  • 135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

  • 135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0 June 14, 2013

    Appendix C (WBS)

  • 135 Taylor Rd.

    Niagara-on-the-Lake, ON

    L0S 1J0

    June 14, 2013

    Fonthill Cemetery Mapping Phase 1

    1.0 Project Management

    1.1 Client Advisory Meeting on Data Processing Issues

    1.2 Advisory Meetings

    1.3 Project Team Meetings

    1.4 Project Managing

    2.0 Project Proposal

    2.1 Resumes and Biographies

    2.2 Project Overview Statement

    2.3 Project Proposal Presentation

    2.4 Project Proposal Report

    3.0 Complete File Geodatabase

    3.1 File Geodatabase

    3.2 User Guide and Operator's Manual

    4.0 Pr