Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PROJECT-BASED EVALUATION:
ANTI-DISPLACEMENT MATRIX
This matrix is a tool for evaluating green gentrification pressures for a particular green infrastruc-ture project or investment plan. It is geared towards city planners, public officials, and private or non-profit developers. The goal of this matrix is to highlight to what extent a project is prepared to support and implement anti-displacement measures.
Step 1: Complete the matrix on the back side of this sheet.• There are seven project categories to consider: funding, land ownership, planning process,
construction, operation and maintenance, housing joint-development, and environmentaljustice evaluation.
• Each anti-displacement tactic within the project categories are evaluated based on four imple-mentation metrics: financial support, planning, capacity, and pre-existing infrastructure.
• Determine a rating for each implementation metric on a scale of zero to two. Zero means thata green infrastructure project has not implemented support structures for a particularanti-displacement tactic, one means partial implementation, and two means full implementa-tion.
• Add up the totals for each anti-displacement tactic. Based on those sums, add up totals foreach anti-displacement project category.
Step 2: Consider the strengths and weaknesses of your project or plan within the context of different anti-displacement policy tools and their conditions for success.
• Community Capacity tools support community-based resilience to navigate gentrificationand build community power. These tools are most effective when there is adequate funding topay community organizers and this organizing leadership comes from within a community.
• Public Subsidies provide direct funding for affordable housing through a variety of ownershipstructures both public and private. These tools are most effective when there is adequate andreliable funding.
• Cooperative Ownership models give communities ownership over their own housing. Thesetools are most effective when residents have access to technical assistance for self-gover-nance as well as regulatory support.
• Regulatory tools use public policy to help change the landscape of traditional housing mar-kets. These tools are most effective when public entities have the capacity to enforce policyand residents have access to legal support when enforcement falls short.
• Market-Based tools leverage private development to generate community benefits, whetherit is affordable housing units or job creation. These tools are most effective when they haveclear and consistent enforcement.
•
Funding
Land Ownership
Planning Process
Construction
Operation and Maintenance
Housing Joint-Development
Environmental Justice Evaluation
Financial Support
Implemen-tation Plan
Implementa-tion
Capacity
Pre-Existing Infrastruc-
tureTotal
Anti-displacement plan
Public investment accountability plan
Grant writing support systems
Public ownership
Cooperative ownership
Indigenous land reparations
Uses anti-racist framework
Funding allocation prioritizes BIPOC leadership/contractors
Provides tenant protection technical assistance
Provides affordable homeownership technical assistance
Community feedback plan
Participatory design process
Meets local hire standards
Includes job training programs
Union labor
Employee owned labor
Meets local hire standardsIncludes job training and/or education
programsUnion labor
Living wage labor
Employee owned labor
Living wage labor
Pays into housing trust fund or joint development fund
Holds or sets aside land for future housing development
Builds affordable housing on site
Environmental burden assessment
Displacement risk assessment
Evaluates historical contexts
Accessible by public transit
Community input in grant/ contract allocation process
Ownership reflects local community
Planned in partnership with community organizers
None = 0, Partial = 1, Full = 2
/40
/40
/40
/32
/48
/24
/32