Upload
yasuo
View
33
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Progress in Laser Desorption Mass Spectrometry: Sample Analysis in the Lab and in Space. Theme IV: Analytical Approaches. Outline. Theme IV Objectives Methods and Instrumentation Example Analyses What’s Next. Theme IV Objectives. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
Progress in Laser Desorption Mass Spectrometry: Sample Analysis in the Lab and in Space
Theme IV: Analytical Approaches
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
Outline
1.Theme IV Objectives
2.Methods and Instrumentation
3.Example Analyses
4.What’s Next
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
Theme IV Objectives
1. Develop new techniques to study the composition of complex planetary materials and analogs in situ APL: Optimize LDMS-based methods for organic analysis that are
complementary to GC/LC-MS, for both lab and spacecraft use
2. Relate the composition of comets and carbonaceous asteroids, via sample analysis, to the organics found in the ISM and those thought to be “pre-biotic.” APL: Utilize capability of laser desorption to examine nonvolatile
organics and other species with little or no sample preparation
3. How can we best study primitive organic-bearing bodies over variable spatial scales and chemical properties? APL: Understand in particular the importance of analyses of complex
(high m.w.), non-volatile phases, at fine spatial scales, to astrobiology
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
Methods and Instrumentation (APL)
Impact Plasma Chemistry: Exobiology
Laser Mass Spectrometry
LD/LA TOF-MS
Organic Analysis and Method Development:
NAI
AP-MALDI Ion Trap MS
Instrument Development:
PIDDP etc.
LD/LA EPI-TOF-MS
REMPI, RIMS
In Situ Experiments
?
Higher TRL Lower TRL
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
Methods and Instrumentation (APL)
In situ applications:• Strong mass, power, and complexity drivers LDI• Use the simplest version of an experiment that addresses
specific, high-priority measurement objectives
Laboratory applications:
• Essentially the same “simple” TOF-MS with enhanced laser, imaging, ion optical, sample manipulation, and electronics systems, is a state-of-the-art instrument
• High precision (few m) XYZ manipulation of intact meteorite chips• LD of neutrals (from 10-100 m spots) with selectable • Selectable direct LD ions or fully resonant L2PI, into TOF-MS• Or, LD neutral gas into LC- or GC-MS (Themes 3 and 4)
• Potential to obtain spatially-correlated elemental, isotopic, and organic composition from unprepared samples
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
Miniature LD-TOF-MS
• Laser TOF-MS can be miniaturized without major performance degradation compared with laboratory instruments.
• Gridless ion optics, low-noise detectors, and nonlinear “ideal” reflectrons permit high mass resolution and low detection limits.
• Caveat: measures mass only (not structure)!
The reflectron corrects TOF dispersion: ions with same m/z but different energies arrive at the detector simultaneously. A nonlinear reflectron focuses LA and LD ions (wide KE band) as well as organic product ions.
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
LAMS
• LAMS = laser ablation mass spectrometer
• Elemental/ isotopic analysis from stand-off position (airless body: ~ 1 cm – 1 m range)
• Nd:YAG laser ( = 1064 nm, > 1 GW cm-2)
• Sample at electrical ground
• No sample preparation or contact needed
• Elemental LODs as low as ppmw bulk
• Probe on fine scales (spot size 30-100 m) can probe inclusions and detect grains
• Complementary to Pyr-GC/MSm/z (amu/e)
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
0
50
100
150
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70
0
50
100
150
0
50
100
150
12C
16O
23Na
24Mg28Si
32S
40Ca
52Cr(Mg2+)
(a) ALH83100
(b) ALH83100
(c) Allende
54Fe
56Fe
58Fe+58Ni
60Ni
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
DS-TOF• 355 or 337 nm pulses < 108 W cm-2 (1 - 20 Hz)• Unprepared chips or powders, mounted on insertion
probe and held at +5 kV• Monolithic nonlinear reflectron• Double-sided detector system• Organic and elemental analysis capabilities• Refractory organic LODs in low ppbw range• Probe on fine scales (spot size <100 m)
Bold = detected m/z; Non-bold = inferred m/z
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
“Tower” TOF
• Normal incidence desorption at 266 nm (or 355, 1064, or 337 nm)
• Lateral postionization at 235 – 390 nm with doubled visible OPO
• Unprepared samples mounted on XYZ bellows stage with 13 mm lateral and 25 mm vertical travel
• Instrument and samples are vertical• Samples at electrical ground; flight
tube biased to negative voltage• No pre- or post-acceleration grids• Sensor about 50% size of DS-TOF• Elemental and organic chemical
imaging at resolutions ~ 50 m• Under development!
laser focus pointion extraction lens
detector assembly
ion reflectron
~ 7.5 cm
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
Sample Handling and Preparation
1st order attitude:
“We don’t need no stinking sample preparation!”
Intact chips: analysis of heterogeneity and association of detected organics with their formation environment. Strongly limited by low concentrations and matrix effects!
Powder samples pressed into probe tip wells. Samples must be inspected for homogeneity given small laser spot size!
2 mm Green River Shale
50 m laser diam.JSC Mars-1
1 mm
ALH 83100
Rocks Fine Powders
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
Sample Handling and Preparation
• Crushing and sieving: distinguish any real compositional biases from instrument biases (absorptivity dependence)
• Thin, flat samples (e.g. H2O slurry droplet) generally give best resolution and reproducibilty (E-field uniformity?)
Ground and pipetted samples for “bulk” analysis. Surface types (bare metal, tapes, Si slides, and MCP chips) have various advantages for LDMS. <150 mbulk
Palisades Basalt
2nd order attitude:
“Uh, we’d better measure sample-specific effects.”
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
Sample Handling and Preparation
“How do we get the fine-grained stuff where we want it?”
A compact sample acquisition system for fines uses grooves laser-etched in Si to entrap particles in a pre-defined series of size bins below ~500 m.
50 mlaser diam.
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
“Simple” Samples - Sand
Na
K
CrFe
SRM 81a SandRLE 200
Li Na K Cr
FeRb
Cs
SRM 81a SandRLE 385
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
“Simple” Samples – Lithium
• Light (6, 7 amu) alkali metal – RIMS ~ 15%
• High mobility, diffusivity
• Elevated 7Li of CI chondrites may indicate aqueous parent body processing1
• Li gradients and high 7Li could be tracers of major crustal water movement in the source regions of basaltic shergottites2
• Lithium is highly heterogenous in martian meteorites and zoned in pyroxene grains (degassing indicator?)3,4
1. McDonough et al. LPS 2006
2. Reynolds et al. LPS 2006
3. Lentz et al. GCA 2001
4. Herd et al. GCA 2005
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
• Preliminary UV LDMS data indicate “large” signatures might be recovered from unprepared samples (without matrix)
• We are characterizing the small instrument bias as a function of sample mounting scheme (probe and material details)
• Average of 3 spots and 3 laser pulse energies: • 6Li/7Li = 0.085 compared with LSVEC standard value of 0.0832• Insufficient statistics to determine precision, as yet• A work in progress … may need improved LDI characteristics
6Li/7Li in a Li2CO3 Standard RM 8545 LSVEC
-3.00E-04
2.00E-04
7.00E-04
1.20E-03
1.70E-03
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
m/z
SRM 8545 LSVECRLE 70
-5.00E-04
1.50E-03
3.50E-03
5.50E-03
7.50E-03
9.50E-03
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200
m/z
SRM 8545 LSVECRLE 130
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
“Simple” Samples – Sand + Phenanthrene
-0.0005
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
m/z
SRM 81a +0.1% phenanthrene RLE 223
m/z 178C14H10
Rb
Na
Al
X
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
“Simple” Samples – Sand + Benzoic Acid
Na
Al
K
Ti
CrFe
TiO
Ni
Li TiO2
Rb
C6H5CO
ONa
Ti3FeOC6
Ti2O2
C6H5CO
Na
C10H8
SRM 81a Sand + Benzoic AcidRLE 180
m/z
-0.0005
0
0.0005
0.001
0.0015
0.002
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500
SRM 81a Sand + Benzoic AcidRLE 180
Trace hydrocarbon impurities in C6H5COOH as provided (99.5%)
m/z
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
“Real” Samples – Green River Shale
• Less evidence of extensive high mass aromatics, compared to C-chondrites, consistent with n-alkane dominated IOM from algal source (Greenwood et al. 2004)
• Chemical noise is currently limiting resolution of high-mass parent compounds in powder sample; extensive fragmentation at higher laser power lower P and
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
0.05
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
m/z
Green River Shale RLE 200
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
“Real” Samples – Mars Analogs
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
0
2
4
6
6Li
7Li (a) Atacama Yungay
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.01
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
m/z
Palisades basalt (bulk)RLE 175
-0.005
-0.0045
-0.004
-0.0035
-0.003
-0.0025
-0.002
-0.0015
-0.001
-0.0005
0
150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
HWMK979 040606 014.6/-0.4/1.8//5/-5.25 kVSA 502RLE 245
435 = 396+39K+
419 = 396+23Na+
321 = 282+39K+
217=178+39K+
305 = 282+23Na+
201=178+23Na+
HWMK979
1 mm
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
What’s Next?
• DS-TOF: Systematic analyses of standards, catalyzed smoke analogs, meteorites, and Mars analogs in collaboration with Theme 3 and 4 team.
• Identify overlapping or related detections w/LDMS and GCMS
• Feed LDMS detections back to analog definition/analysis
• Complete “Tower TOF” instrument and begin calibration and demonstration runs with blanks and standards
• Addition of negative ion detection mode (3 instruments)
• Set up LD-EPI-MS on DS-TOF
• Set up postionization mode on Tower TOF
• Fine scale chemical imaging LDMS campaigns
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
Electron ionization TOF-MS
• miniature EI source developed at Goddard for APL TOF-MS, permits EI and LD-EPI
• Analyze more volatile high mass organics
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
Post-ionization system for REMPI/RIMS (in development)• Two-laser (Nd:YAG/OPO) LD-LPI-TOF-MS system (235 – 700 nm)• Online switch between lateral LPI (a) and coaxial LPI or resonant LD (b)
(a)
(b)
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
Backup Slides
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
An exobiology digression
• Current exobiology grant at APL: Organic Synthesis in Hypervelocity Impacts (OSHI)
• Developed specialized instrumentation using planetary major equipment (PME) grant
• Using laser mass spectrometry to probe formation of organics in post-impact plasma plumes (v > 25 km s-1)
• TOF-MS able to distinguish plume-formed from surface desorbed molecules via kinetic energy distributions and other factors. Extensive hydrocarbon formation occurs.
• Addresses entire spectrum from survival through complete molecular dissociation and recondensation in impacts.
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
An exobiology digression
The Hypervelocity Impact Simulation Microprobe (HISM) is used to generate laser mass spectra that simulate dust and micrometeorite impacts over a range of velocities, impactor diameters, and compositions.
Mass Spectrometer
Target Probe
Laser Power Supply
Laser Head
Main Laser Objective
HISM Electronics
Intact Survival
Complete Atomization
0 1 2 5 10 20 50 100
Depending on Angle, Composition, Mass
Impact Velocity (km s-1)
Molecular Fragmentation
Recombination of Fragments?
0 ? ~ 108 109 1010
ε (W cm-2)
No Plasma PlasmaLase
rIm
pact
Intact Survival
Complete Atomization
0 1 2 5 10 20 50 100
Depending on Angle, Composition, Mass
Impact Velocity (km s-1)
Molecular Fragmentation
Recombination of Fragments?
0 ? ~ 108 109 1010
ε (W cm-2)
No Plasma PlasmaLase
rIm
pact
Qualitative correlations between impact velocity and molecular survivability (top), and laser irradiance and processes (bottom).
Example HISM spectrum from simulated impact involving high-purity carbon and NH4NO3 target materials in a physical mixture. > 1.5 GW cm-2
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
Cation Ratio (Given)
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101
Cat
ion
Ra
tio (
Mea
sure
d)
10-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
Powder/SiPellet/SiGlass/Siy = xPowder/FePellet/FeGlass/Fe
O
[Si]
Al
FeCa
Mg
Na
P
K/Ca
Ca
[Fe]
Ti
Mn
V
CrCuNi
Zn
Co
100x
1x
0.01x
Cs...Nd
Rb...Nb
Fe
Fe
O
O
Ca
Ca
Glass
Powder
Pellet
BHVO-2 Basalt Standard
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
JSC Mars-1 Simulant
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
W. B. Brinckerhoff, C. M. Corrigan, A. L. Ganesan, T. J. Cornish, P. R. MahaffyGoddard Center for Astrobiology Team Meeting, March 23-24, 2006
High-resolution in situ chemical imaging
• xyz sample manipulation system developed in collaboration with Honeybee Robotics
• examine location of organics in meteorites
Other Honeybee Robotics Collaborations
• MSL Sample Acquisition/Sample Handling and Processing (SA/SPaH) system
• Precision subsampling systems
Sample Handling and Vacuum Stuff
Vacuum Issues (Mars)
• Method 1: (“brute force”) Acquire samples; use vacuum seals/valves; pump out.
• Method 2: (“relax requirements”) Sample and/or ionize at ambient pressure; draw into dynamically-pumped MS; consider designs that tolerate higher operating pressure.
• Evaluating current generation of Creare mini TMD pumps (to be flown in SAM on MSL)