Upload
grant-millin
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Progress Energy Skyland Plant 5.16.12 Coal Data (w. Synopsis)
1/7
Period Ending: 12/30/2002 12/30/2003 12/30/2004 12/30/2005
Coal Burned (Tons) 976,988 951,572 850,876 959,370
Net Generation (MWh 2,501,050 2,417,948 2,106,908 2,370,895
Coal Burned (Tons), b 244,247 237,893 212,719 239,843
Highest eight years avgerage: 245,000 per quarter
5/2/12 Data Synopsis, per James S. McLawhorn
Director, Electric Division
Public Staff North Carolina Utilities Commission
From: "Mclawhorn, James"
Subject: Asheville Skyland Coal Plant Data
Date: May 2, 2012 5:09:01 PM EDT
To: "'[email protected]'"
Cc: "Mclawhorn, James" , "Gruber, Robert"
, "Ellis, Kennie"
Grant,
Attached is a spreadsheet that shows the last 10 years data for the Asheville Skyland Coal Plant,
detailing annual MWH general and annual tons of coal burned.
In addition, I have determined that in 2010, PECs (Progress Energy Corporation) total systemnet generation was 58,188,728 MWH. In comparison, 2011 total system net generation was
54,105,081 MWH, for a year over year reduction of 4,083,647 MWH. Of this difference,
additional off-system purchases made up only 549,921 MWH, so there was still a net reduction
of 3,533,726 MWH for the PEC system year over year. This net reduction is tied primarily to
milder weather in 2011 vs. 2010.
Coal generation declined by 6,176,012 MWH year over year, while nuclear generation increased
by 3,557,991 MWH and natural gas combined cycle generation increased by 2,455,325 MWH.
The increase in nuclear generation was the result of the Robinson nuclear plant returning tomore normal operation in 2011 after a series of outages in 2010. The increase in natural gas
combined cycle generation was the result of a decline in natural gas prices in 2011 vs. 2010 and
an increase in generating capacity, as a 2nd natural gas combined cycle unit was brought online
in June of 2011, increasing capacity from 586 MW to approximately 1,242 MW of natural gas
combined cycle generation at PECs Sherwood H. Smith Energy Complex in Richmond County,
NC.
7/31/2019 Progress Energy Skyland Plant 5.16.12 Coal Data (w. Synopsis)
2/7
state-wide coal consumption, but our recent conversations have focused on the above and
attached data, however, so that is where I have devoted my efforts. Please advise if you still
want the other information.
James McLawhorn
_________________________________________________________________________________________
James S. McLawhorn
7/31/2019 Progress Energy Skyland Plant 5.16.12 Coal Data (w. Synopsis)
3/7
12/30/2006 12/30/2007 12/30/2008 12/30/2009 12/30/2010 12/30/2011
964,360 969,206 993,854 949,209 1,075,051 816,031
2,282,532 2,290,404 2,173,277 2,149,148 2,383,465 1,728,619
241,090 242,302 248,464 237,302 268,763 204,008
> 2011 coal co
> 2011 coal co> 2011 coal co
750,000.00
850,000.00
950,000.00
1,050,000.00
1,150,000.00
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Scale:100,0
00Tons
Progress Energy Skyland Plant: Coal Consu
7/31/2019 Progress Energy Skyland Plant 5.16.12 Coal Data (w. Synopsis)
4/7
7/31/2019 Progress Energy Skyland Plant 5.16.12 Coal Data (w. Synopsis)
5/7
Averages YR/4
9,506,517 950,652
2,240,425 4
sumption is 24% below 2010 high
sumption is 14% below ten-year averagesumption averages 19% lower with trend lines after 2005 increasing in downward slope
2009 2010 2011
ption, 2002-2011
Coal Burned (Tons)
7/31/2019 Progress Energy Skyland Plant 5.16.12 Coal Data (w. Synopsis)
6/7
2011
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG
103,028.00 71,121.00 71,539.00 49,689.00 64,038.00 73,757.00 84,983.00 80,081.00
Q1 2011 245,688.00
2012
JAN FEB
38,875 60,067 95,244
Q1 2012 194,186
64,153.00
Tons (Thousands)
Q1 2011 245,688
Q1 2012 194,186
51,502 21%
Average 201 204,008
245,688
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
Q1 2011
TonsCoalConsumed(Thousan
ds)
PEC Asheville (Skylan
Q1 2011 a
7/31/2019 Progress Energy Skyland Plant 5.16.12 Coal Data (w. Synopsis)
7/7
SEP OCT NOV DEC
46,971.00 46,880.00 64,474.00 59,470.00 816,031.00
194,186
Q1 2012
) Quarter-to-Quarter Coal Burned,
d Q1 2012 Comparison
Q1 2011
Q1 2012
21%