68
Products Liability and Basic Tort Law kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page i

Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Products Liability andBasic Tort Law

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page i

Page 2: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page ii

Page 3: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Products Liability andBasic Tort Law

Martin A. KotlerProfessor of Law

Widener University

Carolina Academic PressDurham, North Carolina

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page iii

Page 4: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Copyright © 2005Martin A. KotlerAll Rights Reserved

ISBNLCCN

Carolina Academic Press700 Kent StreetDurham, North Carolina 27701Telephone (919) 489-7486Fax (919) 493-5668www.cap-press.com

Printed in the United States of America

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page iv

Page 5: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

To Melinda

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page v

Page 6: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page vi

Page 7: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Contents

Acknowledgments xixTable of Cases xxi

Chapter 1 Negligence 31.1 Introduction: Sources of Law 31.2 Common-Law Negligence 5

1.2.1 The Standard of Conduct: The Reasonable Person Standard 61.2.1.1 Imputed Knowledge: Defendants Held to “Expert” Standard 8

1.2.2 The “Delegation” Problem in Negligence Cases 91.2.3 Balancing Approaches to Determine Reasonableness 13

1.2.3.1 Risk-Utility Analysis 131.2.3.2 Cost-Benefit Analysis 14

1.2.4 The Concepts of Reasonableness and Rationality: An Economic Approach to Negligence Law 15

1.3 Negligence Per Se 181.4 Due Care Per Se 27

Chapter 2 Misrepresentation 292.1 Introduction: Forms of Tortious Misrepresentation 292.2 Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Common Law Deceit) 29

2.2.1 False Representation of Material Fact 302.2.1.1 False Representation 302.2.1.2 “Mere” Nondisclosure 312.2.1.3 Materiality 322.2.1.4 The Fact — Opinion Distinction 33

2.2.2 Scienter 342.2.3 Intent to Induce Reliance 36

2.2.3.1 Direct and Indirect Misrepresentation 372.2.3.2 Reliance by One Other than the Plaintiff 382.2.3.3 Intent to Defraud the Plaintiff 392.2.3.4 Fraud on Regulatory Agencies 40

2.2.4 Causation: The Detrimental Reliance Requirement 412.2.4.1 Reasonable or Justifiable Reliance 43

2.2.5 Damages 472.2.5.1 Benefit of the Bargain 482.2.5.2 Out of Pocket 482.2.5.3 A Compromise Approach 492.2.5.4 Consequential Damages 50

vii

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page vii

Page 8: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

2.2.6 Defenses 522.3 The Negligence — Fraud Intersection 532.4 Negligent Misrepresentation 55

2.4.1 Duty 562.4.1.1 Personal Injury-Property Damage Cases 562.4.1.2 Pecuniary Loss Cases 57

2.4.1.2.1 Persons to Whom a Duty is Owed 582.4.1.2.2 Who Owes a Duty and the Nature of the

Underlying Transaction 592.4.2 Breach 612.4.3 Causation 62

2.4.3.1 Reliance 622.4.3.2 Reasonable or Justifiable Reliance 63

2.4.4 Damages 642.4.5 Defenses 65

2.4.5.1 Contributory/Comparative Negligence 652.4.5.2 Voluntary Assumption of Risk 66

2.5 Strict Liability for Innocent Misrepresentation 672.5.1 Duty Issues 682.5.2 False Representation of Material Fact 68

2.5.2.1 The Fact — Opinion Distinction 692.5.2.2 Public Misrepresentations 69

2.5.3 Scienter 702.5.4 Reasonable or Justifiable Reliance 702.5.5 Damages 722.5.6 Defenses 72

2.6 Misrepresentation under the Products Liability Restatement 73

Chapter 3 Breach of Warranty 753.1 Introduction 753.2 The Vertical Privity Problem 763.3 Horizontal Privity 793.4 Tort and Contract: The Scope of the Code 813.5 Express Warranty 84

3.5.1 Affirmations, Promises, Descriptions and Models or Samples 843.5.1.1 Affirmations, Promises and Descriptions 843.5.1.2 Models and Samples 87

3.5.2 Basis of the Bargain 883.5.2.1 Reliance Required 893.5.2.2 Post-Sale Statements as Contract Modifications 903.5.2.3 Reliance Unnecessary or Burden Shifts 913.5.2.4 2003 Revisions 913.5.2.5 The “Sales Puff” Problem 92

3.5.3 Adoption of Warranties 933.6 Implied Warranty of Merchantability 95

3.6.1 In General 953.6.2 “Merchant with Respect to Goods of that Kind” 963.6.3 Merchantability 98

3.6.3.1 “Pass without Objection in the Trade” 98

viii CONTENTS

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page viii

Page 9: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

3.6.3.2 “Fair Average Quality” 1003.6.3.3 “Fit for the Ordinary Purpose for which Such Goods

Are Used” 1003.6.3.4 “Run . . . of Even Kind, Quality and Quantity” 1033.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and

“Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label” 103

3.6.3.6 “Course of Dealing or Usage of Trade” 1043.7 Implied Warranty of Fitness for Particular Purpose 106

3.7.1 Reliance 1073.7.2 Ordinary Purpose and Particular Purpose 108

3.8 Disclaimers 1093.8.1 Disclaiming Written Express Warranties 1103.8.2 Disclaiming Oral Express Warranties 1103.8.3 Disclaiming Implied Warranties 111

3.8.3.1 Conspicuousness 1113.8.4 “As Is” Disclaimers 1133.8.5 Buyer’s Opportunity to Inspect 1143.8.6 Restrictions on Disclaimers 115

3.8.6.1 Statutory Prohibition of Disclaimers in Consumer Sales 1153.8.6.2 Unconscionability and Other Restrictions on Warranty

Disclaimers 1163.9 Notice of Breach 117

3.10 Remedies for Breach 1193.11 Sellers’ Attempts to Limit Remedies 120

3.11.1 Attempts to Exclude Personal Injury from Consequential Loss 1213.11.2 Refund, Repair or Replace Limitations 122

3.12 Statute of Limitations and Accrual of the Cause of Action 1233.12.1 2003 Proposed Revisions 124

Chapter 4 Strict Liability in Tort 1274.1 Introduction 1274.2 Elements of the Strict Liability Cause of Action 131

4.2.1 Commercial Distribution of the Product by One in the Business 1324.2.1.1 Defendant as a Commercial “Seller” 1324.2.1.2 Commercial Distribution: Placing the Product in the

Stream of Commerce 1334.2.1.2.1 Sale or Commercial Lease 1334.2.1.2.2 Products That Have Not Yet or Will Never

Enter the Stream of Commerce 1344.2.1.2.3 Parties Other Than Distributors 1354.2.1.2.4 The Sales — Service Distinction 136

4.2.2 The Concept of “Defectiveness” 1394.2.2.1 Intended and Foreseeable Uses and Abuses 140

4.2.2.1.1 The “Crashworthiness” Doctrine 1414.2.2.1.2 Other Product Misuse Cases 1424.2.2.1.3 Dismantling and Disposing of Products 143

4.2.3 Types of Defects 1444.2.3.1 Manufacturing Defects 144

CONTENTS ix

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page ix

Page 10: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

4.2.3.2 Design Defects 1454.2.3.2.1 Consumer Expectation Test 145

4.2.3.2.1.1 The Background: Escola and Greenman 145

4.2.3.2.1.2 Application of the Consumer Expectation Test 1474.2.3.2.1.2.1 The Patent Danger Rule 1484.2.3.2.1.2.2 Who Is “the Consumer?” 150

4.2.3.2.2 Risk-Utility Test 1514.2.3.2.2.1 The Problem of Defining “Utility” 1524.2.3.2.2.2 The Feasible (Reasonable) Alternative

Design Requirement 1544.2.3.2.2.2.1 The Feasibility of the

Alternative Design:One View of the State of the Art Problem 157

4.2.3.2.2.3 The Strict Liability-Negligence Distinction 159

4.2.3.2.2.4 Hindsight and Foresight Approaches 1604.2.3.2.2.4.1 The Unknowable

Generic Risk Cases:Another View of the “State of the Art” Problem 162

4.2.3.2.2.4.2 Changes in Technology 1654.2.3.2.2.5 The Delegability Problem in Design

Cases 1664.2.3.2.2.5.1 Finished Products 166

4.2.3.2.2.5.1.1 Single Use Products 166

4.2.3.2.2.5.1.2 Multi-Purpose Products 168

4.2.3.2.2.5.2 Unfinished Products 1704.2.3.2.2.5.3 Raw Materials 171

4.2.3.2.3 Other Approaches to Design Defects 1724.2.3.2.3.1 The Two-Prong Approach 1724.2.3.2.3.2 The Products Liability Restatement

Approach 1764.2.3.2.3.3 The Pennsylvania Approach 178

4.2.3.3 Marketing Defects: Failure to Warn (Adequately) or Failure to Give (Adequate) Instructions 1814.2.3.3.1 The Test for “Defect” 183

4.2.3.3.1.1 The Attempt to Use a Hindsight Approach 184

4.2.3.3.1.2 The Delegability Problem in Marketing Defect Cases 185

4.2.3.3.2 Common Warning and Instruction Breaches 1874.2.3.3.2.1 Inadequate Display 1874.2.3.3.2.2 Inadequate Content 189

x CONTENTS

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page x

Page 11: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

4.2.3.3.2.3 Inadequate Instructions for Safe Usage 190

4.2.4 Defining “Product” for Strict Liability Purposes 1924.2.4.1 Realty 193

4.2.4.1.1 Conveyances of Realty as Product Sales 1934.2.4.1.2 Sale of Building Components 194

4.2.4.2 Intangible Products 1954.2.4.3 Used Products 198

Chapter 5 Duties and Immunities 2035.1 Introduction 2035.2 Duty: In General 2045.3 “Rules” and “Standards” Approaches to Duty or “No-Duty” Decisions 2075.4 Extension of the Foreseeability Principle: The Rescue Doctrine 210

5.4.1 The Fireman’s Rule 2115.5 The Foreseeability Principle and Preconception Torts 2125.6 Acts and Omissions 214

5.6.1 The Post-Sale Duty Cases: In General 2155.6.1.1 Latent Defect or Danger at Point of Sale 2175.6.1.2 Voluntary Assumption of Post-Sale Duty 2195.6.1.3 Obligations Arising Out of Post-Sale Technological

Advances 2205.6.1.4 Duty to Respond to Post-Sale Information Regarding

Misuse 2215.6.2 Post-Sale Duty to Warn: Successor Corporations 223

5.7 Other Judicially Imposed Limitations 2245.7.1 The Privity Doctrine 2245.7.2 The Patent Danger Rule 2275.7.3 The Duty Problem in Point-of-Sale Failure to Warn Cases 229

5.7.3.1 No Duty to Warn of Obvious or Generally Known Dangers 230

5.7.3.2 Dangers Actually Known 2335.7.3.3 Duty to Warn Experts or Sophisticated Purchasers 2355.7.3.4 Duty to Warn of Dangers of Using Another’s Product 2385.7.3.5 Allergic Reactions (Other than Prescription Drugs) 240

5.8 Legislatively Imposed Limitations 2435.8.1 The Workers’ Compensation Bar 243

5.8.1.1 The Intentional Harm Exception 2445.8.1.2 The Dual Capacity Doctrine 246

5.8.2 Legislative Pre-Emption 2495.8.2.1 Federal Pre-Emption: The Background 2495.8.2.2 Cipollone v. Liggett Group 2515.8.2.3 Post-Cipollone Pre-Emption 255

5.9 Special Problems of Sovereign Immunity and the Government Contractor Defense 2645.9.1 Background: Sovereign Immunity 2645.9.2 The Federal Tort Claims Act 265

5.9.2.1 The “Discretionary Acts” Exclusion 2675.9.2.2 Other Limitations: The “Feres Doctrine” 269

CONTENTS xi

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xi

Page 12: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

5.9.2.3 Products Liability Claims against the Government 2705.9.3 The Government Contractor “Defense” 271

Chapter 6 Causation 2756.1 Actual and Proximate Cause: In General 2756.2 Actual Causation 277

6.2.1 More on the “But For” Test 2776.2.2 The “Substantial Factor” Test 2786.2.3 Omissions 280

6.3 Proximate Cause 2816.3.1 Duty and Proximate Cause 2826.3.2 The “Directness” Approach 2836.3.3 The Foreseeability Approach 285

6.3.3.1 Outcome and Mechanism 2866.3.3.2 The Hazard or Risk Approach 288

6.3.3.2.1 The Proposed Restatement Approach 2896.3.3.3 Intervening Acts and Events and Superseding Causes 291

6.3.3.3.1 Intentional (Criminal) Misconduct 2936.3.3.3.2 Product Misuse or Alteration 2956.3.3.3.3 Intervention of “Conscious and Responsible”

Agent 2986.3.3.3.4 Shifting Responsibility 299

6.3.4 “Directness” Exceptions to Foreseeabity 3026.3.4.1 The “Thin Skull” Plaintiff Doctrine 3026.3.4.2 The Suicide Cases 304

Chapter 7 Damages 3057.1 General Principles 305

7.1.1 Foreseeability 3057.1.2 Certainty 308

7.1.2.1 Lost Profits under the UCC Prior to the 2003 Revisions 3097.1.2.2 The 2003 Revisions 312

7.2 An Overview of Basic Damage Rules 3137.2.1 Property Damage 313

7.2.1.1 Real Property 3137.2.1.2 Personal Property 315

7.2.2 Personal Injury Damages 3177.3 Emotional Distress Damages 319

7.3.1. The Hypersensitive Plaintiff and Thin Skull Plaintiff 3207.3.2 The Direct Infliction Cases 321

7.3.2.1 The Impact Rule 3217.3.2.2 Fear for One’s Own Safety: Zone of Danger 3217.3.2.3. The Physical Consequence Requirement 3227.3.2.4 Proof of Emotional Distress by Itself Sufficient 3237.3.2.5 Cancerphobia 323

7.3.2.5.1 Medical Monitoring 3287.3.3 The Indirect Infliction (Bystander) Cases 329

7.3.3.1 The Zone of Danger 3297.3.3.2 The Three Proximities 330

xii CONTENTS

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xii

Page 13: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

7.3.3.3 Distress to User of a Product 3307.3.4 Emotional Distress for Breach of Contract 331

7.4 Wrongful Death and Survival 3337.5 Loss of Consortium 3357.6 Duplicative Tort and Contract Remedies 3367.7 The Economic Loss Rule 338

7.7.1 Negligence 3387.7.2 Strict Liability in Tort 340

7.7.2.1 Privity 3447.7.2.2 Availability of Some Remedy 3447.7.2.3 Expansion to Foreseeable Property Damage 345

7.7.3 Fraud, Negligent Misrepresentation and Other Torts 3467.8 Punitive Damages: In General 352

7.8.1 The Evidentiary Standard 3557.8.2 The Amount of Punitive Damages 356

7.8.2.1 Defendant’s Wealth 3567.8.2.2 Relationship between Compensatory and Punitive

Damages 3577.8.2.3 The Danger of Multiple Punitive Awards 357

7.8.3 Constitutionality 358

Chapter 8 Defenses 3638.1 In General 3638.2 Defenses Based on Agreement 364

8.2.1 Express (Contractual) Assumption of Risk: Negligence 3648.2.2 Express (Contractual) Assumption of Risk: Strict Liability 3668.2.3 Express Assumption of Risk: Warranty 3688.2.4 Implied Voluntary Assumption of Risk: Negligence and

Strict Liability 3688.2.4.1 Nature and Extent of the Risk Assumed 3698.2.4.2 Proof of Plaintiff ’s Knowledge and Appreciation 3728.2.4.3 Voluntary Decision to Encounter Risk 372

8.2.4.3.1 Fear of Losing One’s Job 3728.2.4.3.2 Reflexive Risk Taking 373

8.2.4.4 Reasonable and Unreasonable Assumption of Risk 3748.2.5 Implied Voluntary Assumption of Risk: Warranty 375

8.3 Defenses Based on Plaintiff ’s Conduct 3778.3.1 Contributory and Comparative Negligence 377

8.3.1.1 Contributory or Comparative Fault: Strict Liability Cases 380

8.3.1.2 Comparative Fault: Warranty Cases 3838.3.2 Merger of Contributory/Comparative Fault and Implied

Voluntary Assumption of Risk 3838.3.3 Primary or Reasonable Assumption of Risk 3868.3.4 Apportionment of Responsibility in Crashworthiness Cases 389

8.3.4.1 Plaintiff ’s Conduct as Contributory or Comparative Fault 3908.3.4.2 Plaintiff ’s Conduct as a Causation Issue 390

8.3.5 Failure to Mitigate Damages and Failure to Take Advance Precaution against Risk of Harm 392

CONTENTS xiii

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xiii

Page 14: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

8.3.5.1 Failure to Mitigate (“Avoidable Consequences”) 3928.3.5.1.1 Burden of Proof on Mitigation 394

8.3.5.2 Failure to Take Pre-Accident Precautions 3958.3.5.3 The “Seatbelt Defense” 396

8.3.6 Product Misuse 398

Chapter 9 Indemnity and Contribution 4019.1 Third Party Actions: In General 401

9.1.1 Accrual of the Cause of Action 4019.1.2 Claim Distinct from Underlying Cause of Action 405

9.2 Express (Contractual) Indemnity 4069.3 Implied Indemnity 408

9.3.1 Joint Tortfeasors 4099.3.2 Implied Indemnity among Joint Tortfeasors 4099.3.3 Implied Indemnity within the Chain of Product Distribution 412

9.4 Contribution Actions 4159.4.1 The Requirement of Joint and Several Liability 416

9.5 Post-Settlement Indemnity and Contribution Rights 4189.5.1 Indemnity from the Settling Party 4189.5.2 Contribution Rights against the Settling Party 4199.5.3 Settlor’s Rights to Seek Indemnity 4209.5.4 Settlor’s Rights to Seek Contribution 421

9.5.4.1 Requirements in Post-Settlement Contribution Cases 4229.5.4.1.1 Statute of Limitations 425

9.6 Indemnity or Contribution Rights against One Who Is Immune from Liability to the Plaintiff 4259.6.1 Indemnity Rights against Plaintiff ’s Employer 4269.6.2 Contribution Rights against Plaintiff ’s Employer 427

9.7 Calculation of the Amount of Contribution Recoverable 428

Chapter 10 Selected Proof Problems 43110.1 In General 431

10.1.1 Judge and Jury 43110.1.2 Burden of Proof 433

10.2 Proof of Industry Custom: Negligence Cases 43410.3 Proof of Industry Custom: Strict Liability 438

10.3.1 Manufacturing Defects 43810.3.2 Design Defects 439

10.3.2.1 Consumer Expectation Test 43910.3.2.2 Risk-Utility Test 440

10.3.3 Failure to Warn 44310.4 Proof of Industry Custom: Warranty 44310.5 The Role of Statutes and Regulation in Proving Defect 44410.6 Post-Accident Design Changes and Warnings 446

10.6.1 Background 44610.6.2 Current Status 448

10.7 Circumstantial Evidence: In General 44810.7.1 Res Ipsa Loquitur 44910.7.2 Circumstantial Evidence of Defect: The “Malfunction Doctrine” 450

xiv CONTENTS

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xiv

Page 15: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

10.7.3 Proving Defectiveness at the Point of Sale 45210.8 Proof of Cause-in-Fact 453

10.8.1 Logical Inferences from Testimony and Other Evidence 45410.8.1.1 The Post Hoc Fallacy 455

10.8.2 Proof of Cause-in-fact in the Failure-to-Warn Cases 45610.8.2.1 Inference from the Facts 45710.8.2.2 Rebuttable Presumption 45810.8.2.3 The Products Liability Restatement and Recent Cases 460

10.9 Proof of Which Defendant Caused the Harm 46110.9.1 Identifying the Culprit by Inference and/or Process of

Elimination 46110.9.2 Vicarious Liability 462

10.9.2.1 Concert of Action and Civil Conspiracy 46310.9.2.1.1 Nature of the Underlying Tort 46310.9.2.1.2 Consciously Parallel Conduct 46810.9.2.1.3 Constitutional Challenges to Concert of

Action and Civil Conspiracy 47110.9.2.2 Joint Enterprise 47210.9.2.3 Successor Corporate Liability 474

10.9.2.3.1 Background: Claims against Dissolved Corporations 474

10.9.2.3.2 Successor Corporate Liability 47510.9.3 Shifting Burdens of Proof 478

10.9.3.1 Identity of Responsible Party Known Only to Defendants 479

10.9.3.2 Alternative Liability 48110.9.3.3 Industry-Wide or Enterprise Liability 48210.9.3.4 Market Share Liability 483

10.9.4 The Crashworthiness Cases 48810.9.4.1 Multiple Distinct Injuries 48910.9.4.2 Aggravation of Initial Injury 49010.9.4.3 Single Indivisible Injury 49010.9.4.4 Degree of Certainty 49010.9.4.5 Burden of Proof 491

10.10 Expert Testimony: Some Common Issues 49410.10.1 Assisting the Trier of Fact 49510.10.2 Opinions on “Ultimate Issues of Fact” 49610.10.3 Expert Testimony to Establish Consumers’ Expectations 49810.10.4 Basis of Expert Testimony 50110.10.5 Expert Testimony to Establish Causation 503

10.10.5.1 Probabilistic Evidence 50510.10.6 Trial Judge As Gatekeeper 507

Chapter 11 Special Products 51111.1 Introduction 51111.2 Food Products 512

11.2.1 Design and Marketing Defects 51211.2.2 Manufacturing Defects 512

11.2.2.1 The Foreign-Natural Test 512

CONTENTS xv

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xv

Page 16: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

11.2.2.2 The Consumer Expectation Test 51311.2.2.3 Alternative and Combination Tests 515

11.3 Unavoidably Unsafe Products: Drugs 51511.3.1 Defectively Designed Drugs 51611.3.2 Defectively Manufactured Drugs 52411.3.3 Instructions and Warning in Drug Cases 525

11.3.3.1 Manufacturer’s Liability: The “Learned Intermediary” Rule 525

11.3.3.2 Dangers to Be Warned About 52811.3.3.2.1 In General 52811.3.3.2.2 Allergic and Idiosyncratic Reactions to Drugs 530

11.3.4 Liability of Pharmacies and Pharmacists 53211.3.4.1 Liability Based Solely on Status as Seller 532

11.3.4.1.1 Strict Liability 53211.3.4.1.2 Breach of Warranty of Merchantability 536

11.3.4.2 Liability Based on Conduct 53811.3.4.2.1 Negligence and Strict Liability for Failure to

Warn 53811.3.4.2.2 Breach of Express Warranty and Warranty of

Fitness for a Particular Purpose 54111.3.4.2.3 Misrepresentation 542

11.4 Vaccines 54411.5 Other Unavoidably Unsafe Products 545

Chapter 12 Tort Reform 54712.1 Introduction 54712.2 Tort Reform Targets 548

12.2.1 Caps and Other Restrictions on Punitive Damages 54912.2.1.1 Immunity from Punitive Damage Liability on a

Showing of Compliance with State and/or Federal Law 55112.2.2 Limitations on Compensatory Damages 55212.2.3 Statutes of Limitation and Repose 55312.2.4 Limited Abolition of Joint and Several Liability 558

12.2.4.1 Allocation of Responsibility to Non-Parties 56112.2.4.1.1 Immunity from Liability 56212.2.4.1.2 Unidentified or Unavailable Potential

Defendants 56412.2.4.2 Some Statutory Refinements 565

12.2.5 Protection of Non-Manufacturing Sellers 56712.2.6 Abolition of the Collateral Source Rule 56912.2.7 Product Misuse or Alteration As a Defense 572

12.3 Constitutional Issues in Tort Reform Legislation 57312.3.1 Issues Arising under the U.S. Constitution 573

12.3.1.1 Seventh Amendment Right to Jury Trial 57312.3.1.2 Due Process and Equal Protection Challenges to

State Law 57612.3.1.3 The Constitutionality of Potential Federal Legislation 580

12.3.2 State Constitutional Challenges 58112.3.2.1 Right to Jury Trial 581

xvi CONTENTS

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xvi

Page 17: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

12.3.2.2 “Open Courts” and Similar Provisions 58312.3.2.3 Due Process and Comparable Provisions 585

12.3.2.3.1 Traditional Rational Basis Approach 58612.3.2.3.2 Quid Pro Quo Approach 58712.3.2.3.3 Constitutional Incorporation:

Quasi-Fundamental Rights 58912.3.2.4 Equal Protection 592

12.3.2.4.1 “Special Legislation” Provisions 59612.3.2.5 Separation of Powers 600

12.4 A Final Note on Negligence, Strict Liability and Breach of Warranty 601

Index 605

CONTENTS xvii

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xvii

Page 18: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xviii

Page 19: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

xix

Acknowledgments

I owe a debt of gratitude to many people who, in one way or another, assisted in andcontributed to (some may say aided and abetted in) the creation of this text. I prevailedupon friends and colleagues to read, comment upon and correct earlier versions of var-ious chapters knowing that my requests were at best an imposition, and not infre-quently a nuisance. Nevertheless, all responded with grace and generosity and the finalproduct is far better as a result. Particularly, I am indebted to George Conk, DavidFrisch, Robert Lipkin, Michael Risinger and John Wladis for lending their particular ex-pertise to this project.

I am also grateful to the student research assistants who spent many hours for ludi-crously little money digging through cases, proofreading, cite checking and, more im-portantly, telling me when I had succeeded in making difficult concepts utterly incom-prehensible. Past and present Widener law students Kevin Bright, Carmen DiMario,Matt Eltringham, Sara Gross and Kelly Tracy deserve special thanks.

Finally, of course, I need to thank my family. Not only did Melinda take on the Her-culean task of proofreading and correcting earlier versions of the manuscript, buteveryone pretended they were interested in hearing me talk about it.

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xix

Page 20: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xx

Page 21: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

A.J. Decoster Co. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp.,634 A.2d 1330 (Md. 1994) — 7:247–48

A.M. Properties Corp. v. GTE Products Corp.,844 F.Supp. 1001 (D.N.J. 1994) — 10:251

Abel v. Eli Lilly and Co., 343 N.W.2d 164(Mich. 1984) — 10:322–23

Absolon v. Dollahite, 831 A.2d 6 (Md. 2003) —1:127

Accu-Fab & Const., Inc. v. Ladner ex rel. Lad-ner, 2000 WL 274291 (Miss. App. 2000) —12:89–90

Acosta v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd., 717 F.2d 828(3rd Cir. 1983) — 7:292–93

Adams v. Buffalo Forge Co., 443 A.2d 932 (Me.1982) — 5:138, 5:143

Adams v. Children’s Mercy Hospital, 832S.W.2d 898 (Mo. 1992) — 12:214, 12:305

Adams v. G.D. Searle & Co., Inc., 576 So.2d 728(Fla. App. 1991) — 11:52

Adams v. J. I. Case Co., 261 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. App.1970) — 3:173

Adams v. Lift-A-Loft Corp., 1999 WL 33105610(S.D.Ohio 1999) — 6:129

Adams v. Murakami, 813 P.2d 1348 (Cal.1991) — 7:310

ADM Partnership v. Martin, 702 A.2d 730 (Md.1997) — 8:62

Advance Chemical Co. v. Harter, 478 So.2d 444(Fla. App. 1985) — 5:246, 5:255

Advincula v. United Blood Services, 678 N.E.2d1009 (Ill. 1996) — 10:35

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Ralph WilsonPlastics Co., 509 N.W.2d 520 (Mich. App.1993) — 4:327

Affiliates for Evaluation and Therapy, Inc. v. Vi-asyn Corp., 500 So.2d 688 (Fla. App.1987) — 3:37

Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, Inre, 611 F.Supp. 1223 (E.D.N.Y. 1985) —10:435–36

Agristor Leasing v. A.O. Smith HarvestoreProducts, 869 F.2d 264 (6th Cir. 1989) —2:111

Air Bag Prod. Liability Litigation, In re, 7F.Supp.2d 792 (E.D.La. 1998) — 4:435,7:108

Air Crash Disaster at Sioux City, Iowa, on July19, 1989, In re, 1991 WL 279009 (N.D.Ill.1991) — 7:172

Air Crash Disaster, In re, 86 F.3d 498 (6th Cir.1996) — 10:94

Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Eaton MetalProducts Co., 256 F.Supp.2d 329 (E.D.Pa.2003) — 7:273

Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Eaton MetalProducts Co., 272 F.Supp.2d 482 (E.D.Pa.2003) — 2:198, 2:199

AKA Distrib. Co. v. Whirpool Corp., 137 F.3d1083 (8th Cir. 1998) — 7:262

Alaskan Oil, Inc. v. Central Flying Service, Inc.,975 F.2d 553 (8th Cir. 1992) — 7:220

Albala v. City of New York, 429 N.E.2d 786(N.Y. 1981) — 5:65–67

Albers v. Ottenbacher, 116 N.W.2d 529 (S.D.1962) — 1:107

Albert v. J & L Engineering Co., 214 So.2d 212(La. App. 1968) — 5:154

Albertson v. Volkswagenwerk Aktienge-sellschaft, 634 P.2d 1127 (Kan. 1981) —12:114

Aldon Industries, Inc. v. Don Myers & Associ-ates, Inc., 517 F.2d 188 (5th Cir. 1975) —7:31

Alevromagiros v. Hechinger Co., 993 F.2d 417(4th Cir. 1993) — 10:45, 10:56–57,10:397

Alexander v. Choate, 469 U.S. 287 (1985) —12:186

Alexander v. Conveyors & Dumpers, Inc., 731F.2d 1221 (5th Cir. 1984) — 5:158, 10:20

xxi

Table of Cases

(references are to chapter:footnote number)

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxi

Page 22: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Alimenta (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Anheuser-BuschCompanies, Inc., 803 F.2d 1160 (11th Cir.1986) — 3:166–67

Allaback v. Santa Clara County Fair Assn., 54Cal. Rptr.2d 330 (Cal. App. 1996) — 8:1,8:3

Allegheny General Hosp. v. Philip Morris, Inc.,116 F.Supp.2d 610 (W.D.Pa. 1999) —10:183, 10:206–08

Allen v. Delchamps, Inc., 624 So.2d 1065 (Ala.1993) — 5:247

Allen v. G.D. Searle & Co., 708 F.Supp. 1142(D.Or.1989) — 11:93

Allen v. Grafton, 164 N.E.2d 167 (Ohio1960) — 11:22–23

Allen v. Otis Elevator Co., 563 N.E.2d 826 (Ill.App. 1990) — 7:89

Aller v. Rodgers Machinery Mfg. Co., Inc., 268N.W.2d 830 (Iowa 1978) — 10:391

Allison v. United States, 264 F.Supp. 1021(E.D.Ill. 1967) — 5:443

Alloway v. General Marine Industries, 695 A.2d264 (N.J. 1997) — 7:206, 7:211, 7:254

All-Tech Telecom, Inc. v. Amway Corporation,174 F.3d 862 (7th Cir. 1999) — 7:192,7:269–70, 7:280

Alm v. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., Inc., 480N.E.2d 1263 (Ill. App. 1985) 4:433

Aloe Coal Co. & Commercial Union Ins. Co. v.Clark Equip. Co., 816 F.2d 110 (3rd Cir.1987) — 7:219

Alpert v. Thomas, 643 F.Supp. 1406 (D.Vt.1986) — 3:174–75

Alvarez v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 2003 WL715905 (N.D.Cal. 2003) — 9:97–98

AM/PM Franchise Ass’n v. Atlantic RichfieldCo., 584 A.2d 915 (Pa. 1990) — 7:25–28

Ambassador Steel Co. v. Ewald Steel Co., 190N.W.2d 275 (Mich. App. 1971) — 8:180

American Bank & Trust Co. v. CommunityHospital of Los Gatos-Saratoga, Inc., 683P.2d 670 (Cal. 1984) — 12:252

American Mfg. Co. v. United States ShippingBoard E.F. Corp., 7 F.2d 565 (2nd Cir.1925) — 3:250

American Motorcycle Ass’n v. Superior Court,578 P.2d 899 (Cal. 1978) — 9:1, 9:110,9:112

American Safety Equipment Corp. v. Winkler,640 P.2d 216 (Colo. 1982) — 2:269–70

American Suzuki Motor Corp. v. SuperiorCourt, 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 526 (Cal. App.1995) — 7:108

American Universal Ins. Group v. General Mo-tors Corp., 578 So.2d 451 (Fla. App.1991) — 7:241–42

Ameron, Inc. v. Chemische Werke Huls AG,760 F.Supp. 1234 (E.D.Mich. 1991) — 9:18

Amstadt v. U.S. Brass Corp., 919 S.W.2d 644(Tex. 1996) — 12:59

Anderson v. Dries & Krump Mfg. Corp., 739P.2d 1177 (Wash. App. 1987) — 1:49

Anderson v. F.J. Little Mach. Co., 68 F.3d 1113(8th Cir. 1995) — 4:154

Anderson v. Hedstrom Corp., 76 F.Supp.2d 422(S.D.N.Y. 1999) — 4:349

Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S.S.M. Ry.Co., 179 N.W. 45 (Minn. 1920) — 6:14–15,6:17

Anderson v. Scheffler, 752 P.2d 667 (Kan.1988) — 12:114

Anderson v. Somberg, 338 A.2d 1 (N.J. 1975) —10:278–83

Anderson v. State ex rel. Central Bering SeaFisherman’s Ass’n, 78 P.3d 710 (Alaska2003) — 12:28

Anderson v. United States, 55 F.3d 1379 (9thCir. 1995) — 5:451

Anderson v. Wagner, 402 N.E.2d 560 (Ill.1977) — 12:295

Andor v. United Airlines, Inc., 739 P.2d 18(Ore. 1987) — 7:307

Andrews v. Harley Davidson, Inc., 796 P.2d1092 (Nev. 1990) — 8:154

Andrulonis v. United States, 724 F.Supp. 1421(N.D.N.Y. 1989) — 5:430–31, 5:474–75

Anglin v. Kleeman, 665 A.2d 747 (N.H.1995) — 8:184

Angus v. Shiley Inc., 989 F.2d 142 (3rdCir.1993) — 7:108

Anixter Bros., Inc. v. Central Steel & Wire Co.,463 N.E.2d 913 (Ill. App. 1984) — 9:17–18,9:23, 9:34

Apostolico v. Orlando Regional Health CareSystem, Inc., 871 So.2d 283 (Fla. App.2004) — 12:220

Appel v. Standex Intern. Corp., 660 P.2d 686(Or. App. 1983) — 4:154

Arena v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 74Cal. Rptr.2d 580 (Cal. App. 1998) —4:255

Arkansas Elec. Cooperative Corp. v. ArkansasPub. Serv. Comm’n, 461 U.S. 375(1983) — 5:407

Armentrout v. FMC Corp., 842 P.2d 175 (Colo.1992) — 4:270

xxii TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxii

Page 23: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Armstrong Rubber Co. v. Griffith, 43 F.2d 689(2nd Cir.1930) — 7:36, 7:38

Armstrong Rubber Co. v. Urquidez, 570 S.W.2d374 (Tex. 1978) — 4:41–42

Armstrong v. Mailand, 284 N.W.2d 343 (Minn.1979) — 5:49, 8:146

Arneson v. Olson, 270 N.W.2d 125 (N.D.1978) — 12:202, 12:287, 12:293

Arredondo v. Lindley International Trucks,Inc., 758 S.W.2d 846 (Tex. App. 1988) —6:22, 6:49

Arsnow v. Red Top Cab Co., 292 P. 436 (Wash1930) — 6:167

Artis v. Corona Corp. of Japan, 703 A.2d 1214(D.C. App. 1997) — 4:170

Asbestos Litigation, In re, 509 A.2d 1116 (Del.Super. 1986) — 10:335

Asbestos School Litigation, In re, 46 F.3d 1284(3rd Cir. 1994) — 10:229–34, 10:238

Ass’n of Unit Owners of Bridgeview Condo-miniums v. Dunning, 63 P.3d 788 (Or.App. 2003) — 4:397

Atlantic Co. v. Orendorff, 22 So.2d 260 (Fla.1945) — 7:32

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Interstate Oil TransportCo., 784 F.2d 106 (2nd Cir. 1986) —9:105–06

Attorney General v. Johnson, 385 A.2d 57 (Md.1978) — 12:227–28, 12:231

Auburn Mach. Works Co., Inc. v. Jones, 366So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1979) — 4:133

Augustus v. Bean, 14 Cal. Rptr. 641 (Cal.1961) — 9:3, 9:7

Ault v. International Harvester Co., 528 P.2d1148 (Cal. 1974) — 10:95–97

Austin v. Clark Equipment Co., 48 F.3d 833(4th Cir. 1995) — 4:234

Austin v. Ford Motor Co., 273 N.W.2d 233(Wis. 1979) — 8:153

Austin v. Will-Burt Co., 361 F.3d 862 (5th Cir.2004) — 10:45

Automated Donut Systems, Inc. v. ConsolidatedRail Corp., 424 N.E.2d 265 (Mass. App.1981) — 8:170

Autzen v. John C. Taylor Lumber Sales, Inc.,572 P.2d 1322 (Or. 1977) — 3:66–67,3:86–87

Avner v. Longridge Estates, 77 Cal. Rptr. 633(Cal. App. 1969) — 4:395–96

Award Metals, Inc. v. Superior Court, 279 Cal.Rptr. 459 (Cal. App. 1991) — 5:268

Ayers v. Jackson Twnshp, 525 A.2d 287 (N.J.1987) — 7:135

Ayers v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co.,a Subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson Co.,818 P.2d 1337 (Wash. 1991) — 4:321–22

Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc., 391 A.2d1020 (Pa. 1978) — 4:301–03, 10:6

Azzopardi v. Ocean Drilling & Exploration Co.,742 F.2d 890 (5th Cir.1984) — 7:172

B.L. Jet Sales, Inc. v. Alton Packaging Corp.,724 S.W.2d 669 (Mo.App. 1987) —2:196–97

B.N. v. K.K., 538 A.2d 1175 (Md. 1988) — 2:134Babb v. Bolyard, 72 A.2d 13 (Md. 1950) — 2:23Bacardi v. Holzman, 442 A.2d 617 (N.J. Super.

App. Div. 1981) — 11:94–96Badische Corp. v. Caylor, 630 F.Supp. 1196

(N.D.Ga. 1986) — 2:181Bailey v. Huggins Diagnostic & Rehab., 952

P.2d 768 (Colo. App. 1997) — 4:433Bailey v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 989 F.2d

794 (5th Cir. 1993) — 5:496–98Bailey v. V & O Press Corp., 770 F.2d 601 (6th

Cir. 1985) — 10:42Bainter v. Lamoine LP Gas Co., 321 N.E.2d 744

(Ill. App. 1974) — 3:118, 4:38Bair v. Peck, 811 P.2d 1176 (Kan. 1991) —

12:258, 12:260–61Baker v. Arbor Drugs, Inc., 544 N.W.2d 727

(Mich. App. 1996) — 11:189, 11:211–13Baker v. Armco, Inc., 684 S.W.2d 81 (Mo. App.

1984) — 5:299Baker v. Bolton, 170 Eng. Rep. 1033 (1808) —

7:169Baker By and Through Baker v. International

Harvester Co., 660 S.W.2d 21 (Mo. App.1983) — 6:62–67

Baker v. Rosemurgy, 144 N.W.2d 660 (Mich.App. 1966) — 8:79

Balido v. Improved Machinery, Inc., 105 Cal.Rptr. 890 (Cal. App. 1972) — 5:96, 6:138

Ball v. Joy Technologies, Inc., 958 F.2d 36 (4thCir. 1991) — 7:138

Baltimore & O.R. Co. v. Baugh, 149 U.S. 368(1893) — 4:8

Baltimore & O.R. Co. v. Goodman, 275 U.S. 66(1927) — 5:32–33

Bank of America, N.A. v. C.D. Smith Motor Co.,Inc., 106 S.W.3d 423 (Ark. 2003)—7:6

Banner Welders, Inc. v. Knighton, 425 So.2d441, 448 (Ala. 1982) — 8:216

Barb v. Wallace, 412 A.2d 1314 (Md. App.1980) — 3:187

Barbe v. Drummond, 507 F.2d 794 (1stCir.1974) — 7:172

TABLE OF CASES xxiii

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxiii

Page 24: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Barker v. Allied Supermarket, 596 P.2d 870(Okla. 1979) — 3:119

Barker v. Lull Engineering Co., 573 P.2d 443(Cal. 1978) — 4:108–09, 4:149–51, 4:181,4:266, 4:267–69

Barnard v. Kellogg, 77 U.S. 383 (1870) — 2:13Barren v. United States, 839 F.2d 987 (3rd Cir.

1988) — 5:425Barrett v. Fritz, 248 N.E.2d 111 (Ill. 1969) —

8:132Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital for

Magma Copper Company, 692 P.2d 280(Ariz. 1984) — 12:177

Barron v. Ford Motor Co. of Canada, 965 F.2d195 (7th Cir. 1992) — 8:194, 8:198

Barrow v. Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1998 WL812318 (M.D.Fla. 1998) — 2:199, 4:214

Barry v. Edmunds, 116 U.S. 550 (1886) —12:149–50

Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc., 820 A.2d258 (Conn. 2003) — 6:94, 6:150

Barton v. Owen, 139 Cal. Rptr. 494 (Cal. App.1977) — 6:10

Basko v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 416 F.2d 417 (2ndCir. 1969) — 3:41, 6:19, 11:122

Batiste v. American Home Products Corp., 231S.E.2d 269, 273 (N.C. App. 1977) —11:146, 11:203

Batts v. Tow-Motor Forklift Co., 978 F.2d 1386(5th Cir. 1992) — 4:145, 10:397

Baughman v. General Motors Corp., 780 F.2d1131 (4th Cir. 1986) — 5:225–26

Baxter v. Ford Motor Co., 12 P.2d 409 (Wash.1932) — 2:2

Baycol Products Litigation, In re, 218 F.R.D.197 (D.Minn. 2003) — 11:52

Bayley Products, Inc. v. American Plastics Co.,186 N.W.2d 813 (Mich. App. 1971) —7:51

Bayliner Marine Corp. v. Crow, 509 S.E.2d 499(Va. 1999) — 3:106, 10:7

BDO Seidman, LLP v. Mindis AcquisitionCorp., 578 S.E.2d 400 (Ga. 2002) — 2:224

Beacham v. Lee-Norse, 714 F.2d 1010 (10th Cir.1983) — 8:66, 8:78, 8:210

Beaver v. Batrouny, 419 N.Y.S.2d 391 (App. Div.1979) — 10:212–13

Becker v. American Airlines, Inc., 200 F.Supp.243 (S.D.N.Y. 1961) — 4:429

Becker v. IRM Corp., 698 P.2d 116 (Cal.1985) — 4:399

Bednarski v. Hideout Homes & Realty, Inc. 709F.Supp. 90 (M.D.Pa. 1988) — 3:248

Beech Aircraft Corp. v. Jinkins, 739 S.W.2d 19(Tex. 1987) — 9:111

Beech v. Outboard Marine Corp., 584 So.2d441 (Ala. 1991) — 10:59

Behrens v. Fayette Manufacturing Co., 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 264 (Cal. App. 1992) — 5:287–90

Belisle v. Southdale Realty Co., 168 N.W.2d 361(Minn. 1969) — 2:97

Bell Helicopter Co. v. Bradshaw, 594 S.W.2d519 (Tex. Civ. App. 1979) — 5:98–101

Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., a Div. of Textron,Inc. v. United States, 755 F.Supp. 269(D.Alaska 1990) — 9:129

Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc., 637 P.2d 266(Cal. 1981) — 5:284

Bellanca Aircraft Corp., 576 F.2d 582 (5th Cir.1978) — 3:230

Bellotte v. Zayre Corp., 352 A.2d 723 (N.H.1976) — 4:142, 6:103

Bellotte v. Zayre Corp., 531 F.2d 1100 (1st Cir.1976) — 6:103

Bemenderfer v. Williams, 745 N.E.2d 212 (Ind.2001) — 7:174

Bencivenga v. J.J.A.M.M., Inc., 609 A.2d 1299(N.J. Super. App. Div. 1992) — 12:86,12:102, 12:111

Benco Plastics, Inc. v. Westinghouse ElectricCorp., 387 F.Supp. 772 (E.D.Tenn.1974) — 2:254, 2:271

Bendectin Litigation, In re, 857 F.2d 290 (6thCir. 1988) — 1:94, 1:104–05, 2:80, 2:82

Bender v. TBT Operating Corp., 718 N.Y.S.2d154 (N.Y. Sup. 2000) — 9:132

Benedi v. McNeil-P.P.C., Inc., 66 F.3d 1378 (4thCir. 1995) — 10:432

Bennett v. Madakasira, 821 So.2d 794 (Miss.2002) — 11:52

Bentzler v. Braun, 149 N.W.2d 626 (Wis.1969) — 8:197

Berg v. Sukup Mfg. Co., 355 N.W.2d 833 (S.D.1984) — 5:158

Bergstreser v. Mitchell, 577 F.2d 22 (8th Cir.1978) — 5:61

Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp., 337 A.2d893 (Pa. 1975) — 2:249, 3:59, 3:108

Berko v. Freda, 459 A.2d 663 (N.J. 1983) —5:48

Berry v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 717 P.2d 670(Utah 1985) — 12:275

Berry v. Eckhardt Porsche Audi, Inc., 578 P.2d1195 (Okla. 1978) — 5:181

Berry v. G.D. Searle & Co., 309 N.E. 2d 550 (Ill.1974) — 11:167–68

xxiv TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxiv

Page 25: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp., 447A.2d 539 (N.J. 1982) — 4:329–30, 4:332–34

Besser Co. v. Paco Corp., 671 F.Supp. 1010(M.D.Pa. 1987) — 9:101

Best v. Taylor Machine Works, 689 N.E.2d 1057(Ill. 1997) — 12:18, 12:34, 12:69,12:311–14, 12:320–24, 12:326–30,12:339–43

Betancourt v. Manhattan Ford Lincoln Mer-cury, Inc., 607 N.Y.S.2d 924 (App. Div.1994) — 6:84–85

Betehia v. Cape Cod Corp., 103 N.W.2d 64(Wis. 1960) — 11:8, 11:9

Bethlehem Steel Co. v. New York State LaborRelations Bd., 330 U.S. 767 (1947) — 5:407

Bexiga v. Havir Mfg. Corp., 290 A.2d 281 (N.J.1972) — 1:34, 4:235, 8:89–90

Bichler v. Eli Lilly and Co., 450 N.Y.S.2d 776(N.Y. 1982) — 10:220–22

Bichler v. Eli Lilly and Co., 436 N.Y.S.2d 625(App. Div. 1980) — 10:318–20

Bichler v. Willing, 397 N.Y.S.2d 57 (App. Div.1977) — 11:142, 11:203

Bickram v. Case I.H., 712 F.Supp. 18 (E.D.N.Y.1989) — 4:34

Bidar v. Amfac, Inc., 669 P.2d 154 (Haw.1983) — 4:402

Bierczynski v. Rogers, 239 A.2d 218 (Del.1968) — 10:186–87

Bigelow v. Agway, Inc., 506 F.2d 551 (2ndCir.1974) — 3:90

Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp., 412N.E.2d 934 (N.Y. 1980) — 5:298, 5:299

Bilotta v. Kelley Co., 346 N.W.2d 616 (Minn.1984) — 1:46–47, 4:223–26, 4:237

Birklid v. Boeing Co., 904 P.2d 278 (Wash.1995) — 5:275

Biss v. Tenneco, Inc., 409 N.Y.S.2d 874 (App.Div. 1978) — 1:33, 4:237, 4:240–41

Black v. Abex Corp., 603 N.W.2d 182 (N.D.1999) — 10:331–33

Black v. Wickes Corp., 378 N.E.2d 964 (Mass.1978) — 3:144

Blackburn v. Dorta, 348 So.2d 287 (Fla.1977) — 5:49, 8:125–26, 8:128, 8:130–31

Blackburn, Inc. v. Harnischfeger Corp., 773F.Supp. 296 (D.Kan. 1991) — 9:114

Blackston v. Shook & Fletcher Insulation Co.,764 F.2d 1480 (11th Cir. 1985) — 10:333

Blair v. Grand Rapids & I.R. Co., 26 N.W. 855(Mich. 1886) — 8:67

Blalock v. Westwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,1990 WL 10557 (E.D.La. 1990) — 5:253

Blanchard v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.,341 F.2d 351 (5th Cir. 1965) — 5:438

Blanchard v. Wicks, 314 So.2d 366 (La. App.1975) — 6:86

Bland v. Freightliner, LLC, 206 F.Supp.2d 1202(M.D.Fla. 2002) — 7:5

Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals,Inc., 433 N.E.2d 572 (Ohio 1982) — 5:260

Blanton v. Cooper Industries, 99 F.Supp.2d 797(E.D.Ky. 2000) — 5:275

Blocher v. DeBartolo Properties Management,Inc., 760 N.E.2d 229 (Ind. App. 2001) —10:74

Block v. Neal, 460 U.S. 289 (1983) — 5:429Blockhead, Inc. v. Plastic Forming Co., Inc.,

402 F.Supp. 1017 (D.Conn. 1975) —3:224

Bloomquist v. Wapello County, 500 N.W.2d 1(Iowa 1993) — 10:424–29

Bloxom v. Bloxom, 512 So.2d 839 (La. 1987) —10:153

Blue v. Drackett Products Co., 143 So.2d 897(Fla. App. 1962) — 10:145

Blue v. Environmental Engineering, Inc., 803N.E.2d 187 (Ill. App. 2003) — 4:156

BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 517 U.S.559, 607 (1996) — 2:121–22, 7:284–85,7:321, 7:326–31, 12:197

BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, 646So.2d 619 (Ala. 1994) — 7:322–25

Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc., 546N.E.2d 580 (Ill. 1989) — 2:188–89, 4:416

Boatland of Houston, Inc. v. Bailey, 609 S.W.2d743 (Tex. 1980) — 4:183–86

Bob McKiness Excavating & Grading Inc. v.Morton Buildings, Inc., 507 N.W.2d 405(Iowa 1993) — 12:236

Bobka v. Cook County Hospital, 422 N.E.2d999 (Ill. App. 1981) — 5:56, 8:68–72

Bobryk v. Lincoln Amusements, Inc., 15 Conn.L. Rptr. 617 (Super. Ct. 1996) — 4:383

Boeing Airplane Co. v. Brown, 291 F.2d 310(9th Cir. 1961) — 10:92

Boeing Airplane Co. v. O’Malley, 329 F.2d 585(8th Cir. 1964) — 3:207

Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.1969) — 10:9

Boerner v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.,260 F.3d 837 (8th Cir. 2001) — 4:173

Bogner v. General Motors Corp., 459 N.Y.S.2d679 (N.Y.C. Civ. Ct. 1982) — 7:168

Bognis v. Falk Co., 133 N.W. 209 (Wis. 1911)—4:9

TABLE OF CASES xxv

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxv

Page 26: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Boldac v. Crain, 181 A.2d 641 (N.H. 1962) —8:132

Bomb Disaster At Roseville, California, OnApril 28, 1973, In re, 438 F.Supp. 769(E.D.Cal. 1977) — 5:441, 5:443

Bond v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 96 S.E. 932(W.Va 1918) — 8:67

Bondu v. Gurvich, 473 So.2d 1307 (Fla. App.1984) — 7:16

Booker v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 785 P.2d 297(Okla. 1989) — 9:47

Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Prod. Corp., 493 F.2d1076 (5th Cir. 1973) — 4:367

Boruski v. United States, 803 F.2d 1421 (7th Cir.1986) — 5:503

Boryla v. Pash, 960 P.2d 123 (Colo. 1998) —7:123

Boughton v. Cotter Corp., 65 F.3d 823 (10thCir. 1995) — 7:49

Bowen v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 516So.2d 570 (Ala. 1987) — 5:299

Bower v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 522S.E.2d 424 (W.Va. 1999) — 7:78, 7:135

Bowers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 827 So.2d 63(Ala. 2001) — 7:162–67

Bowler v. Stewart-Warner Corp., 563 A.2d 344(D.C.App. 1989) — 3:41

Bowman v. Williams, 165 A. 182 (Md. 1933) —7:97

Boxa v. Vaughn, 674 N.W.2d 306 (S.D. 2003) —8:180

Boy v. I.T.T. Grinnell Corp., 724 P.2d 612 (Ariz.App. 1986) — 8:216

Boyd v. Bulala, 877 F.2d 1191 (4th Cir. 1989) —12:157, 12:160, 12:192

Boyd v. Bulala, 672 F.Supp. 915 (W.D.Va.1986) — 12:157–59, 12:180

Boyl v. California Chemical Co., 221 F.Supp.669 (D.Or. 1963) — 1:26

Boyle v. United Technologies Corp., 487 U.S.500 (1988) — 5:478–79, 5:482–95

Bozeman v. State, 2004 WL 1475373 (La.2004) — 12:136

Brackett v. Johnson, 273 A.2d 499, 500 (Conn.Super. 1970) — 8:79

Bradford v. Herzig, 33 Conn.App. 714, 638A.2d 608 (1994) — 12:86

Bradley v. Appalachian Power Co., 256 S.E.2d879 (W.Va. 1979) — 8:96

Bragg v. Hi-Ranger, Inc., 462 S.E.2d 321 (S.C.App. 1995) — 10:45

Bragg v. United States, 55 F.Supp.2d 575(S.D.Miss. 1999) — 5:499

Brandenburger v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A.,Inc., 513 P.2d 268 (Mont. 1973) — 4:15

Braniff Airways v. Curtiss-Wright Corp., 411F.2d 451 (2nd Cir. 1969) — 5:79

Braun v. Roux Distributing Co., 312 S.W.2d758 (Mo. 1958) — 5:252

Brawner v. Liberty Industries, Inc., 573 S.W.2d376 (Mo. App. 1978) — 4:137, 4:139

Bray v. Marathon Co., 588 S.E.2d 93 (S.C.2003) — 7:157

Breeck v. Aquaslide ‘N’ Dive Corp., 350 N.W.2d149 (Iowa 1984) — 2:36

Brescia v. Great Road Realty Trust, 373 A.2d1310 (N.H. 1997) — 3:188

Brewer v. Jeep Corp., 724 F.2d 653 (8th Cir.1983) — 3:41

Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires Prod. LiabilityLitigation, In re, 155 F.Supp.2d 1069(S.D.Ind. 2001) — 7:108

Bridgewater v. Economy Engineering Company,486 N.E.2d 484 (Ind. 1986) — 6:130

Briehl v. General Motors Corp., 172 F.3d 623(8th Cir.1999) — 2:145

Britt-Tech Corp. v. American Magnetics Corp.,487 N.W.2d 671 (Iowa 1992) — 4:76

Brochu v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 642F.2d 652 (1st Cir. 1981) — 11:93

Brockett v. Harrell Bros. Inc., 143 S.E.2d 897(Va. 1965) — 8:120

Brocklesby v. United States, 767 F.2d 1288 (9thCir. 1985) — 4:430

Broddie v. Litton Unit Handling Systems, 455N.E.2d 142 (Ill. 1983) — 3:29–30

Brokenshire v. Rivas and Rivas, Ltd., 922 P.2d696 (Or. App. 1996) — 4:412–13

Bronster v. U.S. Steel Corp., 919 P.2d 294 (Haw.1996) — 7:254

Brooks v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 902 P.2d 54(N.M. 1995) — 4:213, 10:63–65

Brooks v. Howmedica, Inc., 273 F.3d 785 (8thCir. 2001) — 11:116

Broussard v. Continental Oil Co., 433 So.2d 354(La. App. 1983) — 4:357–58

Brown ex rel. Estate of Brown v. Philip MorrisInc., 228 F.Supp.2d 506 (D.N.J. 2002) —4:213

Brown v. Clark Equipment Co., 618 P.2d 267(Haw. 1980) — 10:20

Brown v. Collins, 53 N.H. 442 (1873) — 4:6Brown v. Ford Motor Co., 67 F.Supp.2d 581

(E.D.Va. 1999) — 8:194, 8:198, 8:201–02Brown v. General Elec. Corp., 648 F.Supp. 470

(M.D.Ga. 1986) — 5:54–55, 5:57–58, 8:147

xxvi TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxvi

Page 27: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Brown v. Hudson, 700 So.2d 932 (La. App.1997) — 3:85

Brown v. McDonald’s Corp., 655 N.E.2d 440(Ohio App. 1995) — 5:251

Brown v. Neff, 603 N.Y.S.2d 707 (Sup. Ct.1993) — 2:129

Brown v. Neff, 668 N.Y.S.2d 873 (Sup. Ct.1997) — 2:238–40

Brown v. Quick Mix Co., Div. of Koehring Co.,454 P.2d 205 (Wash. 1969) — 8:66, 8:78

Brown v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 667 P.2d 750(Ariz. App. 1983) — 4:19192

Brown v. Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470 (Cal.1988) — 10:324–26, 11:33, 11:34, 11:39,11:44–47, 11:59–61

Brown v. United Blood Services, 858 P.2d 391,396 (Nev. 1993) — 10:34

Brown v. Washington County, 987 P.2d 1254(Or. App. 1999) — 12:86

Bruce Farms, Inc. v. Coupe, 247 S.E.2d 400 (Va.1978) — 4:394

Bruce v. Martin-Marietta Corp., 544 F.2d 442(10th Cir. 1976)—4:84–85, 10:46–48, 10:50

Bruce v. State Farm Ins. Co., 859 So.2d 296 (La.App. 2003) — 7:68

Brunsman v. DeKalb Swine Breeders, Inc., 952F.Supp. 628 (N.D.Iowa 1996) — 2:189

Bruszewski v. United States, 181 F.2d 419 (3rdCir. 1950) — 12:113

Bryant v. Adams, 448 S.E.2d 832, 842(N.C.App. 1994) — 3:62

Bryant v. Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., 585 S.E.2d723 (Ga. App. 2003) — 10:443–44, 11:52,11:66

Bryant v. Technical Research Co., 654 F.2d 1337(9th Cir. 1981) — 10:6

Buchanan v. Prickett & Sons, Inc., 279 N.W.2d855 (Neb. 1979) — 5:55

Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs’ Legal Committee,531 U.S. 341 (2001) — 1:95–96, 1:99,2:66–68, 2:81, 5:388–92, 11:37

Budding v. SSM Healthcare System, 19 S.W.3d678 (Mo. 2000) — 4:69

Budgetel Inns, Inc. v. Micro Systems, Inc., 34F.Supp. 2d 720 (E.D.Wis. 1999) — 7:264,7:265

Budgetel Inns, Inc. v. Micro Systems, Inc., 8F.Supp. 2d 1137 (E.D.Wis. 1998) — 7:264,7:265

Builders Supply Co. v. McCabe, 77 A.2d 368(Pa. 1951) — 9:56

Bunting v. Hogsett, 21 A. 31 (Pa. 1891) — 6:50,6:52–53

Burch v. Amsterdam, 366 A.2d 1079 (D.C.1976) — 10:82

Burgess v. Colorado Serum Co., 772 F.2d 844(11th Cir. 1985) — 5:503

Burke v. Harman, 574 N.W.2d 156 (Neb. App.1998) — 2:13, 2:216–19, 2:224, 2:226

Burke v. Spartanics, Ltd., 252 F.3d 131 (2nd Cir.2001) — 5:193–94, 5:196

Burns v. Jaquays Mining Corp., 752 P.2d 28(Ariz. App. 1987) — 7:104, 7:126, 7:134–35

Burrell v. Electric Plant Bd. of City of Franklin,676 S.W.2d 231 (Ky. 1984) — 9:138

Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 884F.Supp. 1515 (D.Kan. 1995) — 7:135

Bushong v. Garman Co., 843 S.W.2d 807 (Ark.1992) — 10:153

Butchkosky v. Enstrom Helicopter Corp., 784F.Supp. 882 (S.D.Fla. 1992) — 7:239–40

Butler v. Flint Goodrich Hospital of DillardUniversity, 607 So.2d 517 (La. 1992) —12:305

Butler v. Jordan, 750 N.E.2d 554 (Ohio2001) — 5:415

Butler v. Navistar Intern. Transp. Corp., 809F.Supp. 1202 (W.D.Va. 1991) — 3:157

Butterfield v. Forrester, 11 East 60, 103 Eng.Rep. 926 (K.B. 1809) — 8:85

Butterworth v. Quick & Reilly, Inc., 171 F.R.D.319 (M.D.Fla. 1997) — 2:87

Butterworth v. Quick & Reilly, Inc., 998 F.Supp.1404 (M.D.Fla.1998) — 2:199

Butz v. Lynch, 762 So.2d 1214 (La. App.2000) — 4:95–97, 5:120, 6:117–18

Butz v. Werner, 438 N.W.2d 509 (N.D. 1989) —10:153

Bynum v. FMC Corp. 770 F.2d 556 (5th Cir.1985) — 3:235, 5:477

Byrd Motor Lines, Inc. v. Dunlop Tire andRubber Corp., 304 S.E.2d 773 (N.C. App.1983) — 3:264

Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Coop., Inc.,356 U.S. 525 (1957) — 12:148

Byrd v. Proctor & Gamble Mfg. Co., 629 F.Supp. 602 (E.D.Ky. 1986) — 4:378

Byrne v. Boadle, 159 Eng. Rep. 299 (Exch.1863) — 10:107

Byrne v. Weichert Realtors, 675 A.2d 235 (N.J.Super. App. Div. 1996) — 2:106–07

Cafazzo v. Central Medical Health Services.,Inc., 635 A.2d 151 (Pa. Super. 1993) —4:69

Caldwell v. Ford Motor Co., 619 S.W.2d 534(Tenn. App. 1981) — 5:47

TABLE OF CASES xxvii

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxvii

Page 28: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Calhoun v. Honda Motor Co., 738 F.2d 126(6th Cir. 1984) — 10:421

Callander v. Sheridan, 546 N.E.2d 850 (Ind.App. 1989) — 8:180

Caldwell v. Overton, 554 S.W.2d 832 (Tex.Civ.App. 1977) — 2:204

Camacho v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd., 741 P.2d1240 (Colo. 1987) — 4:85, 4:281, 5:158

Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. MadisonHotel, Inc., 513 F.2d 407 (D.C.Cir.1975) — 8:183

Caman v. City of Stamford, 746 F.Supp. 248(D.Conn. 1990) — 12:193

Campbell v. A.H. Robins Co., 615 F.Supp. 496,500 (W.D.Wis. 1985) — 10:194

Campbell v. Black Mountain Spruce, Inc., 677P.2d 379 (Colo. App. 1983) — 5:299

Campbell v. General Motors Corp., 649 P.2d224 (Cal. 1982) — 10:401

Campbell v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 98P.2d 409 (Utah 2004) — 7:342

Camper v. Minor, 915 S.W.2d 437 (Tenn.1996) — 12:76

Campo v. Scofield, 95 N.E.2d 802 (N.Y.1950) — 5:147–49

Campos v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 485A.2d 305 (N.J. 1984) — 4:361, 5:189–92,5:209

Canton Provision Co. v. Gauder, 196 N.E. 634(Ohio 1935) — 7:32

Capital Holding Corp. v. Bailey, 873 S.W.2d 187(Ky. 1994) — 7:126

Capitol Fuels, Inc. v. Clark Equipment Co., 382S.E.2d 311 (W.Va. 1989) — 7:220

Caprara v. Chrysler Corp, 417 N.E.2d 545 (N.Y.1981) — 10:98

Cardomon v. Iowa Lutheran Hospital, 128N.W.2d 266 (Iowa 1964) — 8:170

Cardozo v. True, 342 So.2d 1053 (Fla. App.1977) — 4:423

Carley v. Wheeled Coach, 991 F.2d 1117 (3rdCir. 1993) — 5:503

Carolina Indus. Products, Inc., v. Learjet, Inc.,189 F.Supp.2d 1147 (D.Kan. 2001) — 7:5

Carpetland of Northwest Arkansas Inc. v.Howard, 803 S.W.2d 512 (Ark. 1991) —9:103

Carrecter v. Colson Equipment Co., 499 A.2d326 (Pa. Super. 1985) — 4:307

Carrett v. Panacon Corp., 204 S.E.2d 354 (Ga.App. 1974) — 4:416

Carrizales v. Rheem Mfg. Co., 589 N.E.2d 569(Ill. App. 1991) — 5:79

Carroll Towing Co., United States v..159 F.2d169 (2nd Cir. 1947) — 1:58–59, 4:148

Carroll v. Gava, 159 Cal. Rptr. 778 (Cal. App.1979) — 2:227

Carroll v. Otis Elevator Co., 896 F.2d 210 (7thCir. 1990) — 10:375–77

Carroll v. Whitney, 29 S.W.3d 14 (Tenn.2000) — 12:99

Carson v. Maurer, 424 A.2d 825 (N.H. 1980) —12:280, 12:283–95

Carter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 557F.Supp. 1317 (E.D.Tex. 1983) — 4:213

Carter v. Masey-Ferguson, Inc., 716 F.2d 344(5th Cir. 1983) — 10:42, 10:52, 10:55

Carter v. Taylor Diving & Salvage Co., 341F.Supp. 628 (E.D.La. 1972) — 5:48

Cartwright v. Firemans Insurance Co. ofNewark, N.J., 213 So.2d 154 (La. App.1968) — 1:107

Cartwright v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 936F.Supp. 900 (M.D.Fla. 1996) — 10:432

Caruso v. M & O Insulation Co., 802 N.E.2d327 (Ill. App. 2003) — 10:10

Casa Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 951 S.W.2d865 (Tex. App. 1997) — 9:110

Case v. Fibreboard Corp., 743 P.2d 1062 (Okla.1987) — 10:333, 10:335

Casey v. Russell, 188 Cal. Rptr. 18 (Cal. App.1982) — 1:118–20

Castrignano v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., 546A.2d 775 (R.I. 1988) — 11:52

Cate v. Dover Corp., 790 S.W.2d 559 (Tex.1990) — 3:208–09, 3:211

Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Beck, 593 P.2d 871(Alaska 1979) — 4:266, 10:98

Cavanaugh v. Skil Corp., 751 A.2d 518 (N.J.2000) — 4:152

Caver v. Cushman Motor Sales, Inc., 157 Cal.Rptr. 142 (Cal. App. 1979) — 4:75

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Superior Court,954 P.2d 511 (Cal. 1998) — 7:16

Celotex Corp. v. Copeland, 471 So.2d 533(Fla.1985) — 10:334

Central Washington Refrigeration, Inc. v. Bar-bee, 946 P.2d 760 (Wash. 1997) — 9:19

Champion v. Grey, 420 So.2d 348 (Fla. App.1982) — 7:141

Chapman v. Lily Cache Builders, Inc., 362N.E.2d 811 (Ill. App. 1977) — 4:393

Charleston Nat. Bank v. International HarvesterCo., 317 N.E.2d 585 (Ill. App. 1974)—10:20

Chart v. General Motors Corp., 258 N.W.2d680 (Wis. 1977) — 10:98

xxviii TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxviii

Page 29: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Chateaugay Corp., In re, 146 B.R. 339 (S.D.N.Y.1992) — 5:503

Chavers v. Gatke Corp., 132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 198(Cal. App. 2003) — 10:235–38

Chem Tech Finishers, Inc. v. Paul Mueller Co.,375 S.E.2d 881 (Ga. App. 1988) — 3:20

Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Mfrs.Mut. Ins. Co., 537 N.E.2d 624 (Ohio1989) — 7:235–36

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Forbes, 783 So.2d 1215(Fla. App. 2001) — 1:126

Chicago Export Packing Co. v. Teledyne Indus-tries Inc., 566 N.E.2d 326 (Ill. App.1990) — 2:109–10

Childress v. Church’s Fried Chicken, 196 Cal.Rptr. 404 (Cal. App. 1983) — 2:153–54,2:156

Childs v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp. 7 U.C.C. Rep.Serv.2d 1080 (Va. Cir. Ct. 1988)—3:40

Christian v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co., 126F.Supp.2d 951 (D.Md. 2001) — 10:183

Christopher v. Larson Ford Sales, Inc., 557 P.2d1009 (Utah 1976) — 3:211

Christopherson v. Hyster Co., 374 N.E.2d 858(Ill. App. 1978) — 4:222

Chrum v. Charles Heating & Cooling, Inc., 327N.W.2d 568 (Mich. App. 1982) — 7:168

Chrysler Corp. v. Batten, 450 S.E.2d 208 (Ga.1994) — 5:79

Chung v. Kaonohi Center Co., 618 P.2d 283(Haw. 1980) — 7:41

Chuolasama v. Mazda Motor Corp., 123 F.3d1353 (11th Cir. 1997) — 2:87

Cierpisz v. Singleton, 230 A.2d 629 (Md.1969) — 8:197

Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504(1992) — 2:51, 2:129, 5:302–03, 5:305,5:307, 5:320, 5:325–26, 5:320, 5:322,5:326–27, 5:329–46, 5:359, 5:381

Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 893 F.2d 541(3rd Cir. 1990) — 5:322

Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 693 F. Supp.208 (D.N.J. 1988) — 5:322

Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 649 F. Supp.664 (D.N.J. 1986) — 5:322

Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 644 F. Supp.283 (D.N.J. 1986) — 4:160–61

Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 789 F.2d 187(3rd Cir. 1986) — 5:322, 5:328

Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 593 F. Supp.1146 (D.N.J. 1984) — 5:321–22

Citizens State Bank v. Timm, Schmidt & Co.,335 N.W.2d 361 (Wis. 1983) — 2:185

Citrone v. Hertz Truck Leasing and Rental Ser-vice, 212 A.2d 769 (N.J. 1965) — 4:33–34

City of Philadelphia v. Lead Industries Ass’n,Inc., 994 F.2d 112 (3rd Cir. 1993) —10:307

City of Tucson v. Wondergem, 466 P.2d 383(Ariz. 1970) — 7:178

Clark v. Jeter, 486 U.S. 456 (1988) — 12:173Clark v. McDaniel, 546 N.W.2d 590 (Iowa

1996) — 2:16–18, 2:158Clarke Industries, Inc. v. Home Indem. Co.,

591 So.2d 458 (Ala. 1991) — 4:355–56Clarkson v. Wright, 483 N.E.2d 268 (Ill.

1985) — 8:185, 8:197Classen v. Izquierdo, 520 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1001

(N.Y.Sup.Ct. 1987) — 8:152Clause ex rel. Clause v. State Dept. of Public

Safety, 984 P.2d 559 (Ariz. App. 1998) —10:214

Cleveland By and Through Cleveland v. PiperAircraft Corp., 890 F.2d 1540 (10th Cir.1989) — 10:367–69, 12:122

Clime v. Dewey Beach Enterprises, Inc., 831F.Supp. 341 (D.Del. 1993) — 11:8

Cline v. Prowler Industries of Maryland, Inc.,418 A.2d 968 (Del. 1980) — 3:39–40

Clinkscales v. Carver, 136 P.2d 777 (Cal.1943) — 1:73

Cmwlth, Dept. of General Services v. U.S. Min-eral Products Co., 809 A.2d 994 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2002) — 4:213

Cochran v. McDonald, 161 P.2d 305 (Wash.1945) — 3:114–15

Coello v. Tug Mfg. Corp., 756 F.Supp. 1258(W.D.Mo. 1991) — 5:268, 9:130

Coffer v. Standard Brands, Inc., 226 S.E.2d 534(N.C. App. 1976) — 3:70–71, 3:137–38,3:156, 10:69–70

Coffman v. Keene Corp., 628 A.2d 710 (N.J.1993) — 10:153

Coburn v. City of Tuscon, 691 P.2d 1078 (Ariz.1984) — 5:38

Coghlan v. Wellcraft Marine Corp., 240 F.3d449 (5th Cir. 2001) — 2:142–43

Cole v. Elliott Equip. Co., 653 F.2d 1031 (5thCir. 1981) — 4:34

Collazo-Santiago v. Toyota Motor Corp., 937F.Supp. 134 (D.Puerto Rico 1996) — 4:181,4:266

Collegiate Enterprises, Inc. v. Otis Elevator Co.,650 F.Supp. 116 (E.D.Mo. 1986) — 3:20

Collins v. Eli Lilly and Co., 342 N.W.2d 37(Wis. 1984) — 10:321

TABLE OF CASES xxix

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxix

Page 30: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Collins v. Ridge Tool Co., 520 F.2d 591 (7th Cir.1975) — 5:154

Collins v. United States, 642 F.2d 217 (7th Cir.1981) — 5:459

Collins v. Wayne Corp., 621 F.2d 777 (5th Cir.1980) — 2:251

Collozo-Santiago v. Toyota Motor Corp., 937F.Supp. 134 (D.Puerto Rico 1996) —10:401

Colon ex rel. Molina v. BIC USA, Inc., 199F.Supp.2d 53 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) — 4:170

Comeau v. Wray, 659 N.Y.S.2d 347 (App.Div.1997) — 8:141

Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Roxborough Vil-lage Joint Venture, 944 F.Supp. 827(D.Colo. 1996) — 7:254

Committee on Children’s T.V. v. General FoodsCorp., 673 P.2d 660 (Cal. 1983) —2:49–50

Community Bank v. Bank of Hallandale andTrust Co., 482 F.2d 1124 (5th Cir. 1973) —2:85

Comstock v. General Motors Corp., 99 N.W.2d627 (Mich. 1959) — 5:79

Condemarin v. University Hosp., 775 P.2d 349(Utah 1989) — 12:202

Coney v. J.L.G. Industries, Inc., 454 N.E.2d 197(Ill. 1983) — 12:79

Coniaris v. Vail Associates, Inc., 586 P.2d 224(Colo. 1978) — 9:7

Connelly v. Hyundai Motor Co., 351 F.3d 535(1st Cir. 2003) — 8:198

Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd., 675 N.E.2d584 (Ill. 1996) — 2:22, 3:248, 3:250, 5:78

Conrad v. Tokyo Aircraft Instrument Co., 988F.Supp. 1227 (W.D.Wis. 1998) — 5:452–54

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Gottshall, 512 U.S.532 (1994) — 7:78

Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Dou-glas Corp., 264 Cal. Rptr. 779 (Cal. App.1989) — 2:249

Control Techniques, Inc. v. Johnson, 762N.E.2d 104 (Ind. 2002) — 6:94

Conway v. O’Brien, 111 F.2d 611 (2nd Cir.1940) — 1:60

Conwed Corp. v. Union Carbide Corp., 2004WL 326695 (D.Minn. 2004) — 9:136–37

Cook v. Minneapolis, St. P. & S.S.M. Ry. Co., 74N.W. 561 (Wis. 1898) — 6:16

Cook v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 755 F. Supp. 1468(D.Colo. 1991) — 7:135

Cooley v. Paraho Development Corp., 851 P.2d207 (Colo. App. 1992) — 12:43–44

Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman ToolGroup, 532 U.S. 424 (2001) — 12:153

Cooper Mfg. Corp., In re, 131 F.Supp.2d 1238(N.D.Okla. 2001) — 9:104

Cooper Power Systems, Inc. v. Union CarbideChemicals & Plastics Co., Inc., 123 F.3d675 (7th Cir. 1997) — 7:230–31, 7:234,7:263

Cooper v. Aspen Skiing Co., 48 P.3d 1229(Colo. 2002) — 8:7

Coos-Curry Electric Cooperative v. CurryCounty, 554 P.2d 601 (Or. App. 1976) —9:6

Copass v. Illinois Power Co., 569 N.E.2d 1211(Ill. App. 1991) — 5:275

Cope v. Scott, 45 F.3d 445 (D.C.Cir. 1995) —5:455

Copiers Typewriters Calculators, Inc. v. ToshibaCorp., 576 F.Supp. 312 (D.Md. 1983) —3:22

Corbin v. Coleco Industries, Inc., 784 F.2d 411(7th Cir. 1984) — 5:172

Corbridge v. Clark Equipment Co., 730 P.2d1005 (Idaho 1986) — 8:216

Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Tampa WholesaleLiquor Co., Inc., 573 So.2d 347 (Fla. App.1990) — 9:77–78

Cott v. Peppermint Twist Management Co.,Inc., 856 P.2d 906 (Kan. 1993) — 12:237

Cottonaro v. Southtowns Industries, Inc., 625N.Y.S.2d 773 (App. Div. 1995) — 7:106

Coty v. U.S. Slicing Machine Co., Inc., 373N.E.2d 1371 (Ill. App. 1978) — 8:88, 8:90

Coughtry v. Globe Woolen Co., 56 N.Y. 124(N.Y. 1874) — 5:130

Court v. Grzelinski, 379 N.E.2d 281 (Ill.1978) — 5:50–53

Cover v. Cohen, 461 N.E.2d 864 (N.Y. 1984) —5:80–81

Covey v. Covey, 80 P.3d 553 (Utah App.2003) — 8:180

Coward v. Owens-Corning Fibreglas Corp., 729A.2d 614 (Pa. Super. 1999) — 10:153

Cowart v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 792 So.2d73 (La. App. 2001) — 4:336

Coyle by Coyle v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 584A.2d 1383 (Pa. 1991) — 11:135–36,11:138–41, 11:192–93

Cozzi v. North Palos Elementary School Dist.No. 17, 597 N.E.2d 683 (Ill. App. 1992) —1:49

Craft v. Hermes Consolidated, Inc., 797 P.2d559 (Wyo. 1990) — 7:186

xxx TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxx

Page 31: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Crankshaw v. Piedmont Driving Club, Inc., 156S.E.2d 208 (Ga. App. 1967) — 6:73–74

Craven v. Niagara Mach. and Tool Works, Inc.,417 N.E.2d 1165 (Ind. App. 1981) —10:160–61

Creach v. Sara Lee Corp., 502 S.E.2d 923 (S.C.App. 1998) — 11:7

Creason v. Myers, 350 N.W.2d 526 (Neb.1984) — 7:17–18

Credit Alliance Corp. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.,483 N.E.2d 110 (N.Y. 1985) — 2:182

Creech v. Chandler Signs, Inc., 1990 WL303822 (N.D.Ill. 1990) — 9:99

Creech, In re Estate of, 120 S.W.3d 271 (Mo.App. 2003) — 7:64

Cremeans v. Willmar Henderson Mfg. Co., aDiv. of Waycross, Inc., 556 N.E.2d 1203(Ohio 1991) — 8:66

Cresser v. American Tobacco Co., 662 N.Y.S.2d374 (N.Y.Sup. 1997) — 10:194

Crispin v. Volwagenwerk, AG, 591 A.2d 966(N.J. Super. App. Div. 1991) — 10:358,10:366

Crocker v. Winthop Laboratories, Div. of Ster-ling Drug, Inc. 514 S.W.2d 429 (Tex.1974) — 2:252, 2:260–62, 11:123

Cromeen, Holloman, Sibert, Inc. v. A B Volvo,349 F.3d 376 (7th Cir. 2003) — 2:112

Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp., 501 P.2d 1153(Cal. 1972) — 4:74

Crosbyton Seed Co. v. Mechura Farms, 875S.W.2d 353 (Tex. App. 1994) — 3:193

Crossfield v. Quality Control Equipment Co.,Inc., 1 F.3d 701 (8th Cir. 1993) — 5:243–44

Croteau v. Olin Corp., 704 F.Supp. 318 (D.N.H.1989) — 7:80, 7:148

Crothers v. Cohen, 384 N.W.2d 562 (Minn.App. 1986) — 3:68

Crowder v. Commonwealth, 588 S.E.2d 384(Va. App. 2003) — 7:66

Crowston v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 521N.W.2d 401 (N.D. 1994) — 5:116

Crysco Oilfield Services, Inc., v. Huchinson-Hayes Int’l Inc., 913 F.2d 850 (10th Cir.1990) — 3:193

CSX Transp. Inc. v. Easterwood, 507 U.S. 658(1993) — 5:381, 5:402

Cuevas v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co., 956F.Supp. 1306 (S.D.Miss. 1997)—10:432

Cummings v. HPG International, Inc., 244 F.3d16 (1st Cir. 2001) — 7:263

Cunha v. Ward Foods, 804 F.2d 1418 (9th Cir.1986) — 2:224

Cunningham v. C. R. Pease House FurnishingCo., 69 A. 120 (N.H. 1908) — 2:200–01

Cunningham v. Charles Pfizer & Co., 532 P.2d1377 (Okla. 1974) — 10:153, 11:123

Cunningham v. MacNeal Memorial Hospital,266 N.E.2d 897 (1970) — 4:217

Cunningham v. National Service Industries, Inc.,331 S.E.2d 899 (Ga. App. 1985)—2:164–66

Cunningham v. Northwestern ImprovementCo., 119 P. 554 (Mont. 1911) — 4:9

Curtis v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp., 299F.Supp.2d 777 (N.D.Ohio 2004) — 8:3

Curtis v. Universal Match Corp., Inc., 778F.Supp. 1421 (E.D.Tenn. 1991) — 4:142

Custom Decorative Moldings, Inc. v. InnovativePlastics Technology, 2000 WL 1273301(Del. Ch. 2000) — 3:165

Cuthbertson v. Clark Equipment Co., 448 A.2d315 (Me. 1982) — 3:84–85

Cyr v. B. Offen & Co., Inc., 501 F.2d 1145 (1stCir. 1974) — 10:261–62

D.L. by Friedericks v. Huebner, 329 N.W.2d 890(Wis. 1983) — 10:18–19

Daberkow v. United States, 581 F.2d 785 (9thCir. 1978) — 5:459

Dacor Corp. v. Sierra Precision, 753 F.Supp. 731(N.D.Ill. 1991) — 7:37

DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc., 7 Cal. Rptr. 2d 238(Cal. 1992) — 12:93

Dahl v. Bayerische Motoren Werke (BMW), 748P.2d 77 (Or. 1987) — 8:153

Daitom v. Pennwalt Corp., 1987 WL 93958(D.Kan. 1987) — 3:16

Daka, Inc. v. McCrae, 839 A.2d 682 (D.C.2003) — 7:307

Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15 (1953) —5:417, 5:439–40

Daley v. LaCroix, 179 N.W.2d 390 (Mich.1970) — 7:94, 7:97

Daley v. McNeil Consumer Products Co., a div.of McNeil-PPC, Inc., 164 F.Supp. 2d 367(S.D.N.Y. 2001) — 5:253

Dallas Aerospace, Inc. v. CIS Air Corp., 352F.3d 775 (2nd Cir. 2003) — 2:113–14

Dalton v. Jones, 581 S.E.2d 360 (Ga. App.2003) — 8:135

Dalton v. Stanley Solar & Stove, Inc. 629 A.2d794 (N.H. 1993) — 3:19

Daly v. General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162(Cal. 1978) — 8:105–07, 8:109–10,8:155–56, 8:160–61

D’Amario v. Ford Motor Co., 806 So.2d 424(Fla. 2001) — 8:165

TABLE OF CASES xxxi

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxxi

Page 32: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

D’Ambra v. United States, 338 A.2d 524 (R.I.1975) — 7:81

Damin Aviation Corp. v. Sikorsky Aircraft, aDiv. Of United Technologies Corp., 705 F.Supp. 170 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) — 3:267–68

Daniell v. Ford Motor Co., Inc., 581 F.Supp.728 (D.N.M. 1984) — 5:197–98

Daniels v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., 583S.W.2d 768 (Tenn. App. 1978) — 11:226

Daniels v. New York, N.H. & H.R. Co., 67 N.E.424 (Mass. 1903) — 6:164–65

Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327 (1986) —12:166

Dare v. Lobule, 674 P.2d 960 (Colo. 1974) —8:188

D’Arienzo v. Clairol, Inc., 310 A.2d 106, 112(N.J.Super.L. 1973) — 4:363

Darsan v. Globe Slicing Machine Co., 606N.Y.S.2d 317 (App. Div. 1994) — 5:29

Dart v. Wiebe Mfg., Inc., 709 P.2d 876 (Ariz.1985) — 4:213, 4:266

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,509 U.S. 579 (1993) — 10:448–49,10:453–58

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,951 F.2d 1128 (9th Cir. 1991) — 10:452

Daugert v. Pappas, 704 P.2d 600 (Wash.1985) — 6:12–13

Daughtrey v. Ashe, 413 S.E.2d 336 (Va.1992) — 3:100

Dauphin Deposit Bank and Trust Co. v. ToyotaMotor Corp., 6 Pa. D. & C.4th 609 (Pa.Com. Pl. 1990) — 5:170

Dauphine v. F.W. Woolworth Co., 451 So.2d1333 (La. App. 1984) — 5:299

Davidson v. Rogers, 574 P.2d 624 (Or. 1978) —12:225

Davies v. Datapoint Corp., 1996 WL 521394(D.Me. 1996) — 5:79

Davis v. Avondale Industries, Inc., 975 F.2d 169(5th Cir. 1992) — 5:210–14

Davis v. Gage, 682 P.2d 1282 (Idaho App.1984) — 7:302

Davis v. Gibson Products Co., 505 S.W.2d 682(Tex. Civ. App. 1973) — 4:45

Davis v. Gibson Products Co., 513 S.W.2d 4(Tex. 1974) — 4:45

Davis v. Globe Machine Mfg. Co., 684 P.2d 692(Wash. 1984) — 8:132

Davis v. Mangelsdorf, 673 P.2d 951 (Ariz.1983) — 2:172

Davis v. Marks, 262 S.W. 613 (Ky. App.1924) — 7:58

Davis v. Omitowoju, 883 F.2d 1155 (3rd Cir.1989) — 12:161–62, 12:180, 12:190,12:210–11

Davis v. Otis Elevator Co., 515 So.2d 277 (Fla.App. 1987) — 1:125

Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 399 F.2d 121(9th Cir. 1968) — 11:87–88

Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co., 434 A.2d 106(Pa. Super. 1981) — 10:268

Dawson v. Hill & Hill Truck Lines, 671 P.2d 589(Mont. 1983) — 7:178

Daye v. General Motors Corp., 712 So.2d 120(La.App. 1997) — 2:230–31

Defrees v. United States, 738 F.Supp. 380 (D.Or.1990) — 5:450

deJesus v. Seaboard Coastline R.R., 281 So.2d198 (Fla. 1973) — 1:123–24, 1:126

DeKalb Agresearch, Inc. v. Abbott, 391 F.Supp.152 (N.D.Ala. 1974) — 3:214

Del Mar Beach Club Owner’s Ass’n v. ImperialContracting Co., 176 Cal. Rptr. 886 (Cal.App. 1981) — 4:397

Delaney v. Deere and Co., 999 P.2d 930 (Kan.2000) — 10:397

Delaney v. Humana Hospital, 830 So.2d 1072(La. App. 2002) — 10:29

Delano Growers’ Cooperative Winery v.Supreme Wine Co., Inc., 473 N.E.2d 1066(Mass. 1985) — 7:29

DeLeon v. Louder, 743 S.W.2d 357 (Tex. Civ.App. 1987) — 10:383, 10:420

Delgado v. J.W. Courtesy Pontiac GMC-Truck,Inc., 693 So.2d 602 (Fla. App. 1997) — 262

Delphen v. Department of Transp. and Devel-opment, 657 So.2d 328 (La. App. 1995) —4:155

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. McDonnell DouglasCorp., 503 F.2d 239 (5th Cir. 1974) —7:195, 8:29

Delta Marine, Inc. v. Whaley, 813 F.Supp. 414(E.D.N.Y. 1993) — 3:158, 3:168

Delta Oxygen Co. v. Scott, 383 S.W.2d 885(Ark. 1964) — 3:28

DeLuca by DeLuca v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceu-ticals, Inc., 911 F.2d 941 (3rd Cir. 1990) —10:440–41

DeLuryea v. Winthrop Laboratories, a Div. ofSterling Drug Inc., 697 F.2d 222 (8th Cir.1983) — 10:147–49

DeMendoza v. Huffman, 51 P.3d 1232 (Or.2002) — 12:28

Denny v. Ford Motor Co., 639 N.Y.S.2d 250(N.Y. 1995) — 3:38, 3:152–54

xxxii TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxxii

Page 33: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Deon v. Ford Motor Co., 804 S.W.2d 302 (Tex.Civ. App. 1991) — 5:79

DePaepe v. General Motors Corp., 33 F.3d 737(7th Cir. 1994) — 8:198

Department of Transp. v. Jackson, 494 S.E.2d20 (Ga. App. 1997) — 1:113

Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp., 414N.E.2d 666 (N.Y. 1981) — 6:95

DeRosa v. Remington Arms Co., 509 F.Supp762 (E.D.N.Y. 1981) — 11:229

Derry v. Peek, 14 App. Cas. 337 (H.L. 1889) —2:33–35

Deutsch v. Stein, 597 S.W.2d 141 (Ky. 1980) —7:89

DeValerio v. Vic Tanny International, 363N.W.2d 447 (Mich. App. 1984) — 3:234

Devaney v. Sarno, 311 A.2d 208 (N.J. Super.App. Div. 1973) — 7:13

Devore v. Hobart Mfg. Co., 359 So.2d 1108(La.App. 1978) — 2:190–92

Diamond v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 134 Cal.Rptr. 895 (Cal. App. 1976) — 10:146

Diamond v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., 397So.2d 671 (Fla. 1981) — 12:275

DiAntonio v. Northampton-Accomack MemorialHospital, 628 F.2d 287 (4th Cir. 1980)—12:194

Diedrich v. Wright, 550 F.Supp. 805 (N.D.Ill.1982) — 8:16

Dietz v. General Electric Co., 821 P.2d 166(Ariz. 1991) — 12:93

Digicorp, Inc. v. Ameritech Corp., 662N.W.2d 652 (Wis. 2003) — 7:232–33,7:262, 7:268

Dillard v. Walsh Press & Die Co., 586 N.E.2d525 (Ill. App. 1991) — 4:243

Dillon v. Legg, 441 P.2d 912 (Cal. 1968) —7:145–46

Dimick v. Schiedt, 293 U.S. 474 (1935) — 12:16Dincher v. Marlin Firearms Co., 198 F.2d 821

(2nd Cir. 1952) — 12:61Dinsmore Instrument Co. v. Bombardier, Inc.,

199 F.3d 318 (6th Cir. 1999) — 7:277–78Distefano v. Lamborn, 81 A.2d 675 (Del.

1951) — 9:6District of Columbia v. Barriteau, 399 A.2d 563

(D.C. 1979) — 7:72Dix & Associates Pipeline Contractors, Inc. v.

Key, 799 S.W.2d 24 (Ky. 1990) — 9:138Dixon v. Bell, 5 M. & S. 198 (1816) — 5:127Dixon v. Four Seasons Bowling Alley, Inc., 424

A.2d 428 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 1980) —4:36

Dixon v. Jacobsen Mfg. Co., 637 A.2d 915 (N.J.Super. App. Div. 1994) — 5:111–12

Doca v. Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, S. A.,634 F.2d 30 (2nd Cir. 1980) — 7:74

Dodson Livestock Co. v. United States, 42 Fed.Cl. 455 (Fed. Cl. 1998) — 5:435

Doe ex rel. Doe v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 178F.Supp.2d 1003 (S.D.Iowa 2001) —10:198–200

Doe v. American Red Cross Blood Services, S.C.Region, 377 S.E.2d 323 (S.C. 1989)—10:34

Doe v. Miles, Inc., 2000 WL 667383 (Mo. App.2000) — 3:193

Doe v. United States, 618 F.Supp. 503 (D.S.C.1984) — 5:438

Doherty v. S.S. Kresge Co., 278 N.W. 437 (Wis.1938) — 1:106

Donham v. United States, 395 F.Supp. 52(D.Mo. 1975) — 5:459

Donoghue (or M’Alister) v. Stevenson, [1932]App. Cas. 562 (H.L.) — 5:9–10

Dooley v. Evertt, 805 S.W.2d 380 (Tenn. App.1990) — 11:176

Dotson v. Blake, 29 S.W.3d 26 (Tenn. 2000) —12:97–98

Doucet v. National Maintenance Corp., 822So.2d 60 (La. App. 2002) — 9:131

Douglas-Hanson Co., Inc. v. B.F. GoodrichCo., 598 N.W.2d 262 (Wis. App. 1999) —7:264

Doupnik v. General Motors Corporation, 275Cal.Rpt. 715 (Cal. App. 1990) — 8:153

Dow Chemical Co. v. Mahlum, 970 P.2d 98(Nev. 1998) — 10:189–91

Downie v. Abex Corp., 741 F.2d 1235 (10th Cir.1984) — 3:88–90, 3:96

Downing v. Overhead Door Corp., 707 P.2d1027 (Colo. App. 1985) — 5:85–86

Downs v. Reads, 446 S.W.2d 657 (Ark. 1969) —1:127

Draper v. Airco, Inc., 580 F.2d 91 (3rd Cir.1978) — 8:66

Dravo Equipment Co. v. German, 698 P.2d 63(Or. 1985) — 3:22

Drayton v. Jiffee Chemical Corp., 591 F.2d 352(6th Cir. 1978) — 3:58–59

Drescher v. Hoffman Motors Corp., 585 F.Supp.555 (D.C.Conn. 1984) — 12:114

Drew Chemical Corp. v. Fidelity and Cas. Co.of New York, 413 N.Y.S.2d 538 (Sup. Ct.1976) — 11:2

Driver v. Burlington Aviation, Inc., 430 S.E.2d476 (N.C. App. 1993) — 2:168

TABLE OF CASES xxxiii

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxxiii

Page 34: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Duchess v. Langston Corp., 769 A.2d 1131 (Pa.2001) — 4:152

Ducko v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 639 A.2d 1204(Pa. Super. 1994) — 10:122–24

Ducre v. Executive Officers of Halter Marine,Inc., 752 F.2d 976 (5th Cir. 1985) — 12:64

Duff v. Bonner Building Supply, Inc., 666 P.2d650 (Idaho 1983) — 8:121

Dufficy & Sons, Inc. v. BRW, Inc., 74 P.3d 380(Colo.App.2002) — 2:198

Dugan by Dugan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 454N.E.2d 64 (Ill. App. 1983) — 6:123–24

Duke Power Co., v. Carolina Study Group, Inc.,438 U.S. 59 (1977) — 12:175, 12:178,12:192

Duke v. Guld & Western Mfg. Co., 660 S.W.2d404 (Mo. App. 1983) — 4:235

Dulieu v. White & Sons, [1901] 2 K.B. 669 —6:151–52

Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 665 S.W.2d 414(Tex.1984) — 8:153

Dunkin v. Syntex Labs, Inc., 443 F.Supp. 121(W.D.Tenn.1977) — 11:93

Dunn v. Kanawha County Bd. of Educ., 459S.E.2d 151 (W.Va. 1995) — 9:23, 9:92–93

Dunn v. Wixon Bros., 493 So.2d 1356 (Ala.1986) — 10:68

Dupont v. Preston, 9 P.3d 1193 (Colo. App.2000) — 7:71

Duprey v. Shane, 249 P.2d 8 (Cal. 1952) —5:282–83

Duran v. General Motors Corp., 688 P.2d 779(N.M. App. 1983) — 10:362

Durden v. Hydro Flame Corp., 983 P.2d 943(Mont. 1999) — 4:213

Durham v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 315 N.W.2d 696(S.D. 1982) — 3:236

Durniak v. August Winter & Sons, Inc., 610A.2d 1277 (Conn. 1992) — 12:100

Dwyer v. Skyline Apartments, Inc., 301 A.2d463 (N.J. 1973) — 3:245–46, 4:402

EAC USA, Inc. v. Kawa, 805 So.2d 1 (Fla. App.2001) — 5:268

Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos, 604A.2d 445 (Md. 1992) — 10:146

East River S.S. Corp. v. Transamerica DelavalInc., 476 U.S. 858 (1986) — 2:138, 7:218

Easterly v. HSP of Texas, Inc., 772 S.W.2d 211,214 (Tex App. 1989) — 11:166

Eastern Airlines v. McDonnell Douglas Corp,532 F.2d 957 (5th Cir. 1976) — 3:243–44

Eckert v. Long Island R. Co., 43 N.Y. 502(1871) — 5:39, 8:67

Edwards v. California Chemical Co., 245 So.2d259 (Fla. App. 1971) — 4:374, 10:140

Edwards v. Keck, 288 N.W. 875 (Iowa 1939) —8:67

Ehlinger v. Sipes, 454 N.W.2d 754 (Wis. 1990)—6:8

Elam v. Alcolac, Inc., 765 S.W.2d 42 (Mo. App.1988) — 6:10

Elgin Airport Inn, Inc. v. Commonwealth Edison,432 N.E.2d 259 (Ill. 1982)—4:111, 4:306

Eli-Lilly & Company, Prozac Products LiabilityLitigation, In re, 789 F.Supp. 1448(S.D.Ind. 1992) — 11:48

Elite Professionals, Inc., v. Carrier Corp., 827P.2d 1195 (Kan. App. 1992) — 8:17

Eller v. Shova, 630 So.2d 537 (Fla. 1993) —5:270

Elliot v. Callan, 466 P.2d 600 (Or. 1970) —1:113

Ellithorpe v. Ford Motor Co., 503 S.W.2d 516(Tenn. 1973) — 8:161

Elmore v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 673 S.W.2d 434(Mo. 1984) — 4:326, 4:338

Elsroth v. Johnson & Johnson, 700 F.Supp. 151(S.D.N.Y. 1988) — 6:106, 10:170

Ely v. General Motors Corp., 927 S.W.2d 774(Tex. App. 1996) — 10:246

Embs v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Lexington,528 S.W.2d 703 (Ky. 1975) 4:44

Empire Casualty Co. v. St. Paul Fire & MarineIns. Co., 764 P.2d 1191 (Colo. 1988)—5:61

Endresz v. Friedberg, 248 N.E.2d 901 (N.Y.1969) — 5:60

English v. New England Medical Center, Inc., 541N.E.2d 329 (Mass. 1989)—12:218, 12:305

English, United States v., 521 F.2d 63 (9th Cir.1975) — 7:72

Enright by Enright v. Eli Lilly & Co., 570N.E.2d 198 (N.Y. 1991) — 5:68, 5:70–71

Enriquez v. Cochran, 967 P.2d 1136 (N.M.1998) — 1:29

Entron Inc. v. General Cablevision of Palatka,435 F.2d 995 (5th Cir. 1970) — 3:207

Eppler v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 860 F.Supp. 1391(W.D.Mo. 1994) — 5:314

Epstein v. Eastman Kodak Co., Inc., 638N.Y.S.2d 490 (App. Div. 1996) — 8:79

Erdman v. Johnson Bros. Radio & TelevisionCo., 271 A.2d 744 (Md. 1970) — 8:82–83

Erie Ins. Co. v. Hickman, 622 N.E.2d 515 (Ind.1993) — 7:307

Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938) —1:87

xxxiv TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxxiv

Page 35: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Escola v. Coca Cola Co. of Fresno, 150 P.2d 436(Cal. 1944) — 4:114–17, 10:113–14,10:171–74

Estate of Elkerson v. North Jersey Blood Center,776 A.2d 244 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 2001)—10:35

Estate of Foronda v. Hawaii International Box-ing Club, 25 P.3d 826 (Haw. App. 2001) —8:140–41, 8:150, 8:152

Estate of Kimmel v. Clark Equip. Co., 773F.Supp. 828 (W.D.Va. 1991) — 5:79

Estate of Warren v. American Marine Holdings,2002 WL 818296 (D.N.H. 2002) — 8:186,8:203–04

Estate of White ex rel. White v. R.J. ReynoldsTobacco Co., 109 F.Supp.2d 424 (D.Md.2000) — 2:22, 5:78

Estell v. Myers, 56 Miss. 800 (1879) — 2:123Etheridge v. Medical Center Hospitals, 376

S.E.2d 525 (Va. 1989) — 12:215,12:240–41, 12:305, 12:333–37, 12:346

eToll, Inc. v. Elias/Savion Advertising Inc., 811A.2d 10 (Pa. Super. 2002) — 7:276

E-Ton Dynamics Industrial Corp. v. Hall, 115S.W.3d 816 (Ark. App. 2003) — 7:23–24

Eusley v. Strato-Lift, Inc., 134 F.Supp. 2d 1191(D.Or. 2001) — 12:142

Evans ex rel. Kutch v. State, 56 P.3d 1046(Alaska 2002) — 12:217, 12:225, 12:305,12:314, 12:333, 12:346

Evans v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 5 P.3d1043 (Nev. 2000) — 7:307

Evans v. General Motors Corp., 2004 WL239867 (Iowa App. 2004) — 4:156

Evans v. General Motors Corp., 359 F.2d 822(7th Cir. 1966) — 4:86–87

Evans v. J. Stiles, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 399 (Tex.1985) — 4:394

Evergreen Amusement Corporation v.Milstead, 112 A.2d 901 (Md. 1955) —7:40

Evich v. Morris, 819 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1987) —7:172

Ewan v. McLean Trucking Co., 706 P.2d 929(Or. 1985) — 4:145

Exxon Valdez, In re, 270 F.3d 1215 (9th Cir.2001) — 7:302

F.H. Ross & Co. v. White, 161 S.E.2d 857 (Ga.1968) — 9:6

Fairchild Industries v. Maritime Air Service,Ltd., 333 A.2d 313 (Md. 1975) — 3:215

Falk v. Keene Corp., 782 P.2d 974 (Wash.1989) — 4:173

Fallon v. Clifford B. Hannay & Son, Inc., 550N.Y.S.2d 135 (App. Div. 1989) — 4:189,4:227–29

Falzone v. Busch, 214 A.2d 12 (N.J. 1965)—7:92Fargo Machine and Tool Co. v. Kearney &

Trecker Corp., 428 F.Supp. 364 (E.D.Mich.1977) — 3:211

Farley v. Engelker, 740 P.2d 1058 (Kan. 1987) —12:128

Farmland Mutual Ins. Co. v. Johnson, 36S.W.3d 368 (Ky. 2000) — 12:317

Farrell v. General Motors Corp., 815 P.2d 538(Kan. 1991) — 3:233

Federal Ins. Co. v. Ferrellgas, Inc., 961 P.2d 511(Colo. App. 1997) — 7:48

Federal Petroleum Co. v. Gas Equipment Co.,105 S.W.3d 281 (Tex. App. 2003) — 9:76

Fein v. Calvin Klein, Ltd., 549 N.Y.S.2d 692(App. Div. 1990) — 10:82

Fein v. Permanente Medical Group, 474 U.S.892 (1985) — 12:249, 12:251, 12:305

Fein v. Permanente Medical Group, 695 P.2d665 (Cal. 1985) — 12:177, 12:250,12:252–53, 12:256–57, 12:299, 12:305

Feldman v. Lederle Laboratories, 479 A.2d 374(N.J. 1984) — 4:337, 10:84–85, 11:52

Felguer v. Anderson, 133 N.W.2d 136 (Mich.1965) — 8:132

Felix v. Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc., 692 N.Y.S.2d413 (App. Div. 1999) — 4:158

Fell v. Kewanee Farm Equip. Co., a Division ofAllied Products, 457 N.W.2d 911 (Iowa1990) — 5:79

Fell v. Zimath, 575 A.2d 267 (Del. Super.1989) — 8:132

Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.,523 U.S. 340 (1998) — 12:151–52

Fender v. Colonial Stores, Inc., 225 S.E.2d 691(Ga. App. 1976) — 3:119

Ferebee v. Chevron Chemical Co., 736 F.2d1529 (D.C. Cir. 1984) — 5:308, 5:311

Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950) —5:457–58, 5:491

Ferguson v. Marshall Contractors, Inc., 707A.2d 660 (R.I. 1998) — 9:131

Fernandez v. Ford Motor Co., 879 P.2d 101(N.M. 1994) — 4:222, 4:229

Fernandez v. Union Bookbinding Co., Inc., 507N.E.2d 728 (Mass. 1987) — 3:226

Fick v. Pilsener Brewing Co., 86 N.E.2d 616(Ohio Com. Pl. 1949) — 10:127

Fidelity Federal Sav. and Loan Ass’n v. de laCuesta, 458 U.S. 141 (1982) — 5:305

TABLE OF CASES xxxv

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxxv

Page 36: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Firestone Steel Products Co. v. Barajas, 927S.W.2d 608 (Tex. 1996) — 5:223–24

Fischer v. Moore, 517 P.2d 458 (Colo. 1973) —8:189

Fishbones, Inc. v. Southern Boat Service ofLa., Inc., 849 So.2d 803 (La. App.2003) — 7:62

Fisher v. Johns-Manville Corp., 512 A.2d 466(N.J. 1986) — 7:316, 7:317, 3:318

Fiske v. MacGregor, Div. of Brunswick, 464A.2d 719 (R.I. 1983) — 8:116

Fitz v. Dolyak, 712 F.2d 330 (8th Cir. 1983) —12:194

Fitzgerald v. Mallinckrodt, 681 F.Supp. 404(E.D.Mich. 1987) — 5:314

Flanagan v. Prudhomme, 644 A.2d 51 (N.H.1994) — 8:180

Fleck v. Bollinger Home Corp., 63 Cal. Rptr. 2d407 (Cal. App. 1997) — 4:403–04, 4:405

Fletcher v. Illinois Central & Gulf RR Co., 679S.W.2d 240 (Ky. App. 1984) — 5:48

Florenzano v. Olson, 387 N.W.2d 168 (Minn.1986) — 2:227

Florida Power & Light v. Westinghouse ElectricCo., 510 So.2d 899 (Fla. 1987) — 7:242

Florida Rock & Tank Lines, Inc. v. Moore, 365S.E.2d 836 (Ga. 1988) — 2:62–64, 2:72

FMC Finance Corp. v. Murphree, 632 F.2d 413(5th Cir. 1980) — 3:235

Ford Motor Co. v. Bland, 517 S.W.2d 641 (Tex.Civ. App. 1974) — 10:445

Ford Motor Co. v. Moulton, 511 S.W.2d 690(Tenn. 1974) — 3:258, 8:31

Ford Motor Co. v. Rice, 726 So.2d 626(Ala.1998) — 7:108

Ford Motor Co. v. Stubblefield, 319 S.E.2d 470(Ga. 1984) — 10:386

Ford Motor Co. v. Taylor, 446 S.W.2d 521(Tenn. App. 1969) — 3:193

Ford Motor Co. v. Wagoner, 192 S.W.2d 840(Tenn. 1946) — 5:96, 6:135–37

Ford Motor Co. v. Zahn, 265 F.2d 729 (8th Cir.1959) — 4:77–78

Ford Motor Co., Vehicle Paint Litigation, In re,182 F.R.D. 214 (E.D.La. 1998) — 2:88

Ford v. American Motors Corp., 770 F.2d 465(5th Cir. 1985) — 5:464–65

Ford v. GACS, Inc., 265 F.3d 670 (8th Cir.2001) — 8:180

Ford v. Harnischerfeger Corp., 365 F.Supp. 602(E.D.Pa. 1973) — 4:233

Foremost Ins. Co. v. Parham, 693 So.2d 409(Ala. 1997) — 2:91

Forma Scientific, Inc. v. BioSera, Inc., 960 P.2d108 (Colo. 1998) — 10:105–06

Fowler v. Happy Goodman Family, 575 S.W.2d496 (Tenn. App. 1978) — 2:98

Fox v. Ford Motor Co., 575 F.2d 774 (10th Cir.1978) — 10:356

Foyle v. Lederle Laboratories, 674 F.Supp. 530(E.D.N.C. 1987) — 11:217

Frank v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 741 N.Y.S.2d 9(App. Div. 2002) — 7:108

Franklin v. Mazda Motor Corp., 704 F.Supp.1325 (D.Md. 1989) — 12:163, 12:165,12:176–77, 12:179–80

Franz v. Cantrell, 711 N.E.2d 856 (Ind. App.1999) — 3:176–78

Fred’s Excavating and Crane Service v. Taylor,340 So.2d 1220 (Fla. App. 1976) — 3:193

Freeman v. Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., 618N.W.2d 827 (Neb. 2000) — 11:52,11:66–72

Freeman v. Myers, 774 S.W.2d 892 (Mo. App.1989) — 2:10

Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick, 514 U.S. 280(1995) — 5:353–54

French v. Willman, 599 A.2d 1151 (Me.1991) — 1:127

Freyermuth v. Lutify, 382 N.E.2d 1059 (Mass.1978) — 6:161, 6:165

Friedman v. General Motors Corp., 331 N.E.2d702 (Ohio 1975) — 10:121

Friedman v. Merck & Co., 131 Cal. Rptr.2d 885(Cal. App. 2003) — 2:186–87, 11:124–25

Friends for All Children, Inc. v. Lockheed Air-craft Corp., 746 F.2d 816 (D.D.C. 1984) —7:135

Fries v. Stieben, 455 F. Supp. 1204 (D.S.D.1978) — 7:181

Frye v. Medicare-Glaser Corp., 605 N.E.2d 557(Ill. 1992) — 11:189

Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (App. D.C.1923) — 10:450–51

Fulbright v. Klamath Gas Co., 533 P.2d 316 (Or.1975) — 4:38

Fuller v. Preis, 322 N.E.2d 263 (N.Y. 1974) —6:162–63

Fundin v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co., 199Cal. Rptr. 789 (Cal. App. 1984) — 3:19,3:197

Funding Systems Leasing Corp. v. King LouieInt’l Inc., 597 S.W.2d 624 (Mo. App.1979) — 3:234

Gagne v. Bertran, 275 P.2d 15 (Cal. 1954) —4:56

xxxvi TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxxvi

Page 37: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Galloway v. State, 654 So.2d 1345 (La. 1995) —1:127

Gangi v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 360 A.2d 907(Conn. Super. 1976) — 8:216

Garcia v. Halsett, 82 Cal. Rptr. 420 (Cal. App.1970) — 4:37

Garcia v. Joseph Vince Co., 148 Cal. Rptr. 843(Cal. App. 1978) — 10:269–71

Garcia v. Superior Court, 268 Cal. Rptr. 779(Cal. 1990) — 2:173

Gardiner v. Gray, 4 Camp. 144, 171 Eng. Rep.46 (1815) — 3:140–41

Gardner v. Q.H.S., Inc., 448 F.2d 238 (4th Cir.1971) — 4:80, 4:354, 4:368–70

Garis v. Conmat Engineering, Ltd., 1996 WL36146 (9th Cir. 1996) — 4:222

Garnes v. Gulf & Western Mfg. Co., 789 F.2d637 (8th Cir. 1986) — 1:26, 1:44–45

Gaspard v. United States, 713 F.2d 1097 (5thCir. 1983) — 5:460

Gates v. Foley, 247 So.2d 40 (Fla. 1971) — 7:184Gaubert, United States v., 499 U.S. 315

(1991) — 5:446–49, 5:469Gavitt v. Monaco Coach Corp., 616 N.W.2d 175

(Mich. App. 2000) — 10:7Gawloski v. Miller Brewing Co., 644 N.E.2d 731

(Ohio App. 1994) — 2:265–68Gazo v. City of Stamford, 765 A.2d 505 (Conn.

2001) — 12:76Gebhardt v. Mentor Corp., 191 F.R.D. 180

(D.Ariz. 1999) — 11:76Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 529

U.S. 861 (2000) — 5:368, 5:370–87, 5:405,5:409, 5:413

Gelsumino v. E.W. Bliss Co., 295 N.E.2d 110(Ill. App. 1973) — 10:42

Gemco-Ware, Inc. v. Rongene Mold and PlasticsCorp., 360 S.E.2d 342 (Va. 1987)—9:124

General Elec. Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136(1997) — 10:462–64

General Motors Corp. v. Hopkins, 548 S.W.2d344 (Tex. 1977) — 8:111

General Motors Corp. v. Howard, 244 So.2d726 (Miss. 1971) — 2:247–48

General Motors Corp. v. Saint, 646 So.2d 564(Ala. 1994) — 8:191

General Motors Corp. v. Sanchez, 997 S.W.2d584 (Tex. 1999) — 4:170

General Motors Type III Door Latch Litigation,In re, 2001 WL 103434 (N.D.Ill. 2001) —4:435

Gentile v. Altermatt, 363 A.2d 1 (Conn.1975) — 12:263, 12:265–67, 12:277

George v. Parke-Davis, 733 P.2d 507 (Wash.1987) — 10:328–29

George v. Skivington, (1869) L.R. 5 Ex. 1 —5:128

GES, Inc. v. Corbitt, 21 P.3d 11 (Nev. 2001) —10:192–93, 10:213

Getchell v. Lodge, 65 P.3d 50 (Alaska 2003) —1:121

Ghionis v. Deer Valley Resort Company, Ltd.,839 F.Supp. 789 (D.Utah 1993) — 8:16

Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 761 F.2d1129 (5th Cir. 1985) — 8:168, 12:54

Gilbert & Bennett Mfg. Co. v. WestinghouseElectric Co., 445 F.Supp. 537 (D.Mass1977) — 3:189–90

Gilbert H. Moen Co. v. Island Steel Erectors,Inc., 878 P.2d 1246 (Wash. App. 1994) —10:205

Gill v. Russo, 39 S.W.3d 717 (Tex. App. 2003) —12:219

Gilliam v. Hi-Temp Products Inc., 677 N.W.2d856 (Mich. App. 2003) — 10:247–51

Gilliam v. Indiana Nat’l Bank, 337 So.2d 352(Ala. Civ. App. 1976) — 3:214

Gillispie v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 187S.E.2d 441 (N.C. App. 1972) — 3:119

Gindy Mfg. Corp. v. Cardinale Trucking Corp.,268 A.2d 345 (N.J. Super. L. 1970) —3:173, 3:216–17

Ginnis v. Mapes Hotel Corp., 470 P.2d 135(Nev. 1970) — 10:98

Giorgi v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 72 Cal.Rptr. 119 (Cal. App. 1968) — 5:59

Girand v. Quincy Farm and Chemical, 6 P.3d104 (Wash. App. 2000) — 2:37

Glassman v. Wyeth Labs, Inc., 606 N.E.2d 338(Ill. App. 1992) — 11:52

Glassner v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 223 F.3d343 (6th Cir.2000) — 2:21

Gleich v. General Motors Corp., 277 N.E.2d 566(Ohio App. 1971) — 3:144

Glenn, United States v., 231 F.2d 884 (9th Cir.1956) — 5:425

Gnirk v. Ford Motor Co., 572 F. Supp. 1201(D.S.D. 1983) — 7:79, 7:151–53

Gober v. Revlon, Inc., 317 F.2d 47 (4th Cir.1963) — 5:255

Gober v. United States, 778 F.2d 1552 (11th Cir.1986) — 5:444–45

Godoy v. Abamaster of Miami, Inc., 754N.Y.S.2d 301 (App. Div. 2003) — 9:75

Goedkoop v. Ward Pavement Corp., 378N.Y.S.2d 417 (App. Div. 1976) — 6:132

TABLE OF CASES xxxvii

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxxvii

Page 38: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Golden v. Conway, 128 Cal. Rptr. 69 (Cal. App.1976) — 4:398, 4:408

Goldfarb v. Teitelbaum, 540 N.Y.S.2d 263 (App.Div. 1989) — 4:69

Goldman v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 514N.E.2d 691 (Ohio 1987) — 10:333

Goldman v. Strough Real Estate, Inc., 770N.Y.S.2d 94 (App. Div. 2003) — 2:97

Goldman v. Walco Tool & Engineering Co., 614N.E.2d 42 (Ill. App. 1993) — 5:253

Golonka v. General Motors Corp., 65 P.3d 956(Ariz. App. 2003) — 10:146, 10:153,10:154, 10:159, 10:162, 10:167

Golt v. Sports Complex, Inc., 644 A.2d 989(Del. Super. 1994) — 4:35

Gomulka v. Yavapai Mach. and Auto Parts, Inc.,745 P.2d 986 (Ariz. App. 1987) — 4:146

Gonzalez v. Digital Equipment Corp., 8F.Supp.2d 194 (E.D.N.Y. 1998) — 4:214

Good v. A.B. Chance Co., 565 P.2d 217 (Colo.App. 1977) — 10:98

Goodbar v. Whitehead Bros., 591 F. Supp. 552(W.D.Va. 1984) — 1:36, 1:38–39, 4:340–42,5:215

Goodell v. ITT-Federal Support Services, Inc.,550 P.2d 1171 (Wash. App. 1976) — 7:168

Goodman v. National Gypsum Co., No. E-68314(Ga. Super. Ct., July 16, 1999)—10:434

Goodson v. Searle Labs., 471 F.Supp. 546(D.Conn.1978) — 11:93

Gordon v. Niagra Machine & Tool Works, 574F.2d 1182 (5th Cir. 1978) — 4:239, 4:243

Gordon v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.,789 F.Supp. 1384 (W.D.Ky. 1992) —11:128–29

Gould Electronics Inc. v. United States, 220F.3d 169 (3rd Cir. 2000) — 9:126

Gourley ex rel. Gourley v. Nebraska MethodistHealth Systems, 663 N.W.2d 43 (Neb.2000) — 12:214, 12:247, 12:305,12:315–16, 12:346, 12:347–48

Govich v. North American Systems, Inc., 814P.2d 94 (N.M. 1991) — 5:42–46

Grady v. American Optical Corp., 702 S.W.2d911 (Mo. App. 1985) — 10:153

Graham v. American Cyanamid Co., 350 F.3d496 (6th Cir. 2003) — 2:130

Graham v. Joseph Ryerson & Sons, 292 N.W.2d704 (Mich. App. 1980) — 5:203–04

Grammatico v. United States, 109 F.3d 1198(7th Cir. 1997) — 5:466, 5:468–69

Gran v. Proctor & Gamble Co., 324 F.2d 309(5th Cir. 1963) — 5:248

Grange Mutual Cas. Co. v. City of Columbus,550 N.E.2d 524 (Ohio App. 1989) —12:135

Graves v. Church & Dwight Co., Inc., 631 A.2d1248 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 1993) — 10:13

Gray v. Lahl, 585 P.2d 664 (Or. 1978) — 1:114Gray v. Manitowoc Co., Inc., 771 F.2d 866 (5th

Cir. 1985) — 4:125–26Great Dane Trailer Sales, Inc. v. Malvern Pulp-

wood, Inc., 785 S.W.2d 13 (Ark. 1990) —3:192

Grecyalny v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 723F.2d 1311 (7th Cir. 1983) — 5:79

Green v. A. B. Hagglund & Soner, 634 F.Supp.790 (D.Idaho 1986) — 3:28

Green v. Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc., 617N.W.2d 881 (Wis. 2000) — 5:247

Green v. Smith & Nephew AHP, Inc., 629N.W.2d 727 (Wis. 2001) — 4:298

Green v. Union Optical Center, Inc., 290N.W.2d 111 (Mich. App. 1980) —10:295–97

Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc., 377P.2d 897 (Cal. 1963) — 3:237–39, 4:20,4:71, 4:118–22

Greenwalt v. Ram Restaurant Corp. ofWyoming, 71 P.3d 717 (Wyo. 2003) —12:224

Gregory v. Cincinnati Inc., 538 N.W.2d 325(Mich. 1995) — 5:89

Gregory v. White Truck & Equipment Co., 323N.E.2d 280 (Ind. App. 1975) — 8:79

Greiner v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft,429 F. Supp. 495 (E.D.Pa. 1977) —10:150–52

Greist v. Phillips, 906 P.2d 789 (Or. 1995) —12:237

Grenada Steel Industries, Inc. v. Alabama Oxy-gen Co., Inc., 695 F.2d 883 (5th Cir.1983) — 10:8–9, 10:93, 10:99–101, 10:446

Griffin v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., 648 F. Supp. 964(W.D.N.C. 1986) — 10:307

Griggs v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 513 F.2d851 (8th Cir. 1975) — 4:359–60, 5:227–29,5:238, 5:240

Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 174 Cal. Rptr.384 (Cal. App. 1981) — 1:66–67, 7:296–97

Griswold v. Gebbie, 17 A. 673 (Pa. 1889) — 2:40Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris USA,

Inc., 347 F.3d 753 (8th Cir. 2003) — 10:11Grove Fresh Distributors, Inc. v. Flavor Fresh

Foods, Inc., 720 F.Supp 714 (N.D.Ill.1984) — 1:90–91

xxxviii TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxxviii

Page 39: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Grover v. Eli Lilly & Co., 591 N.E.2d 696 (Ohio1992) — 5:75

Grundberg v. Upjohn Co., 813 P.2d 89 (Utah1991) — 1:131–32, 11:35–38, 11:62

Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 297 N.W.2d 727(Minn. 1980) — 1:70–71, 1:130, 7:298–99

Guarino v. Mine Safety Appliance Co., 306N.Y.S.2d 942 (N.Y. 1969) — 5:39, 5:47

Guillory v. Domtar Industries Inc., 95 F.3d1320 (5th Cir. 1996) — 5:275

Gulden v. Crown Zellerbach Corp., 890 F.2d195 (9th Cir. 1989) — 5:275

Gumbs v. International Harvester, Inc., 718F.2d 88 (3rd Cir. 1983) — 3:41

Guzman v. St Francis Hosp., Inc., 623 N.W.2d776 (Wis. App. 2000) — 12:218, 12:221,12:305, 12:346

Haas v. Hayslip, 364 N.E.2d 1376 (Ohio1977) — 5:415

Habecker v. Clark Equipment Co., 942 F.2d 210(3rd Cir. 1991) — 4:205–06, 4:308

Hack v. Gillespie, 658 N.E.2d 1046 (Ohio1996) — 5:48

Hacket v. G.D. Searle & Co., 246 F.Supp.2d 591(W.D.Tex. 2002) — 11:48

Hadley v. Baxendale, 156 Eng. Rep. 145(1854) — 7:2–3

Hadley v. Hillcrest Dairy, Inc., 171 N.E.2d 293(Mass. 1961) — 3:118

Hageney v. Jackson Furniture of Danville, Inc.,746 So.2d 912 (Miss. App. 1999) —6:108–09

Hager v. Marshall, 505 S.E.2d 640 (W.Va.1998) — 9:99

Hahn v. Norfolk and Western Ry. Co., 608N.E.2d 683 (Ill. App. 1993) — 9:93

Hahn v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 805 F.2d 1480(11th Cir. 1986) — 4:366

Halberstam v. Welch, 705 F.2d 472 (D.C.Cir.1983) — 10:178

Hall v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.,345 F.Supp. 353 (E.D.N.Y. 1972) — 10:217,10:219, 10:298–302, 10:304

Hall v. Gillins, 147 N.E.2d 352 (Ill. 1958) —12:279

Halliday v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc., 770 A.2d1072 (Md. App. 1999) — 6:122

Halliday v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc., 792 A.2d1145 (Md. 2002) — 4:296

Halpern v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 484So.2d 110 (La. 1986) — 4:179, 4:336

Halstead v. United States, 535 F.Supp. 782(D.Conn. 1982) — 4:430

Hamill v. Smith, 199 A.2d 343 (Conn. Super.1964) — 1:107

Hamilton v. Hardy, 549 P.2d 1099 (Colo. App.1976) — 11:93

Hammond v. Central Lane CommunicationsCenter, 816 P.2d 593 (Or. 1991) — 7:89

Hanberry v. Hearst Corp., 81 Cal. Rptr. 519(Cal. App. 1969) — 4:49

Hand v. Krakowski, 453 N.Y.S.2d 121 (App.Div. 1982) — 11:187

Handley v. Union Carbide Corp., 620 F.Supp.428 (S.D.W.Va. 1985) — 5:276, 5:278

Hanlon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 599F.Supp. 376 (D.Iowa 1984) — 7:283

Hannah v. Gregg, Bland & Berry, Inc., 840So.2d 839 (Ala. 2002) — 4:170, 8:93

Hanover Ltd. v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 758 P.2d443 (Utah App. 1988) — 4:222, 9:47

Hansen v. Abrasive Engineering and Mfg., Inc.,856 P.2d 625 (Or. 1993) — 10:75

Hansen v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co., 858 P.2d970 (Utah 1993) — 7:135

Hanson v. Funk Seeds Int’l, 373 N.W.2d 30(S.D. 1985) — 3:236

Hanson v. Williams County, 389 N.W.2d 319(N.D. 1986) — 12:308, 12:310

Hardman v. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc.,198 N.E.2d 681 (Ill. App. 1964) —3:161–62

Hardy v. Gulf Oil Corp., 949 F.2d 826 (5th Cir.1992) — 9:2

Hardy v. St. Clair, 739 A.2d 368 (Me. 1999) —7:187–88

Harison-Gulley Chevrolet, Inc. v. Carr, 214S.E.2d 712 (Ga. App. 1975) — 3:226

Harkeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc., 656 P.2d 483(Wash. 1983) — 7:186

Harley Davidson Motor Co. v. Powersports,Inc., 319 F.3d 973 (7th Cir. 2003) — 7:249

Harpster v. Hetherington, 512 N.W.2d 585(Minn. 1994) — 6:86

Harris v. M & S Toyota, Inc., 575 So.2d 74 (Ala.1991) — 2:89–90

Harris-Teeter, Inc. v. Borroughts, 399 S.E.2d801 (Va. 1991) — 11:7

Hart-Albin Co. v. McLees Inc., 870 P.2d 51(Mont. 1994) — 8:205–06

Hartnett v. Tripp, 121 N.E. 17 (Mass. 1918) —6:40

Hartwig v. Oregon Trail Eye Clinic, 580 N.W.2d86 (Neb. 1998) — 7:123

Hatch v. Ford Motor Co., 329 P.2d 605 (Cal.App. 1958) — 1:70–80

TABLE OF CASES xxxix

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xxxix

Page 40: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Hathaway v. Krumery, 716 P.2d 1287 (Idaho1986) — 7:168

Haugen v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co., 550P.2d 71 (Wash. App. 1976) — 8:53–54

Hauter v. Zogarts, 534 P.2d 377 (Cal. 1975) —2:249, 3:59, 3:93, 3:95

Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases, In re, 734F.Supp. 1563 (D.Haw. 1990) — 7:77

Hawkins v. Upjohn Co., 890 F.Supp. 609(E.D.Tex 1994) — 2:74–76

Haydel v. Hercules Transport, Inc., 654 So.2d418 (La. App. 1995) — 7:22

Hayes v. Ariens Co., 462 N.E.2d 273 (Mass.1984) — 4:326

Haymore v. Thew Shovel Co., 446 S.E.2d 865(N.C. App. 1994) — 1:30

Haynes v. American Motors Corp., 691 F.2d1268 (8th Cir. 1982) — 2:253

Hays v. General Electric Co., 151 F.Supp.2d1001 (N.D.Ill. 2001) — 3:223

Hazen v. Municipality of Anchorage, 718 P.2d456 (Alaska 1986) — 7:16

Heath v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 464 A.2d 288(N.H. 1983) — 12:275

Heaton v. Ford Motor Co., 435 P.2d 806 (Or.1967) — 4:128–30

Heaven v. Pender, [1882–83] L.R. 11 Q.B.D.503 (C.A. 1883) — 5:4–7

Hebron Public School Dist. No. 13 of MortonCounty, State of North Dakota v. U. S.Gypsum, 953 F.2d 398 (8th Cir. 1992) —7:289, 7:290

Hector v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Ctr., 225Cal.Rptr. 595 (Cal. App. 1986) — 4:69

Hedgepeth v. Fruehauf Corp., 634 F.Supp. 93(S.D.Miss. 1986) — 8:62

Hegyes v. Unjian Enterprises, Inc., 268 Cal.Rptr. 85 (Cal. App. 1991) — 5:61

Heil Co. v. Grant, 534 S.W.2d 916 (Tex. Civ.App. 1976) — 8:47–49

Held v. Ball, 507 N.Y.S.2d 98 (App. Div.1986) — 10:362

Helicord Gage Division of Am. Chair & CableCo. v. Howell, 511 S.W.2d 573 (Tex. Civ.App. 1974) — 4:222

Helinski v. Appleton Papers, 952 F.Supp. 266(D.Md. 1997) — 4:214

Hemphill v. Sayers, 552 F.Supp. 685 (S.D.Ill.1982) — 3:122–23

Henderson v. Sunbeam Corp., 46 F.3d 1151(10th Cir. 1995) — 10:415–18

Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.,104 N.W.2d 843 (Minn. 1960) — 9:65

Henley v. Philip Morris, Inc., 5 Cal. Rptr. 3d 42(Cal. App. 2003) — 10:403–04

Henning v. General Motors Assembly Div., 419N.W.2d 551 (Wis. 1988) — 5:299

Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc., 161A.2d 69 (N.J. 1960) — 3:12–14

Heredia v. Johnson, 827 F.Supp. 1522 (D.Nev.1993) — 11:133

Heritage v. Pioneer Brokerage & Sales, Inc., 604P.2d 1059 (Alaska 1979) — 4:214, 4:258

Herman v. Midland A.G. Service, Inc., 264N.W.2d 161 (Neb. 1978) — 3:118

Herman v. Welland Chemicals, Ltd., 580F.Supp. 823 (M.D.Pa. 1984) — 8:145

Hermann v. General Motors Corp., 720 F.2d414 (5th Cir. 1983) — 8:198

Hernandez v. Badger Construction EquipmentCo., 34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 732 (Cal. App.1994) — 5:91–92

Hernandez v. Nueces County Medical Soc.Community Blood Bank, 779 S.W.2d 867(Tex. App. 1989) — 10:35

Hernandez v. Tokai Corp., 2 S.W.3d 251 (Tex.1999) — 4:159

Hickman v. Fraternal Order of Eagles, Boise#115, 758 P.2d 704 (Idaho 1988) — 12:101

Hickman v. Thomas C. Thompson Co., 644F.Supp. 1531 (D.Colo. 1986) — 8:216

Hicks v. United States, 368 F.2d 626 (4th Cir.1966) — 5:462

Higgins v. Monsanto Co., 862 F.Supp. 751(N.D.N.Y. 1994) — 3:168

High v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 610 So.2d1259 (Fla. 1992) — 4:102–03

Hiigel v. General Motors Corp., 544 P.2d 983(Colo. 1975) — 3:231–32

Hill v. General Motors Corp., 637 S.W.2d 383(Mo. App. 1982) — 5:230–34, 5:236

Hill v. Husky Briquetting, Inc., 220 N.W.2d 137(Mich. App. 1974) — 1026

Hill v. Searle Laboratories, A Div. of SearlePharmaceuticals, Inc., 884 F.2d 1064 (8thCir. 1989) — 11:52

Hill v. Yaskin, 380 A.2d 1107 (N.J. 1997) —5:74

Hills v. Salt River Project Assn. 698 P.2d 216(Ariz. App. 1985) — 5:299

Hines v. Elkhart General Hosp., 465 F.Supp.421 (N.D.Ind. 1979) — 12:165

Hines v. Remmington Arms Co., 522 So.2d 152(La. App. 1988) — 10:392–93

Hinkamp v. American Motors Corp., 735F.Supp. 176 (E.D.N.C.1989) — 8:153

xl TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xl

Page 41: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Hinkle v. Rockville Motor Co., Inc., 278 A.2d42 (Md. App. 1971) — 2:125, 2:128

Hisrich v. Volvo Cars of North America, Inc.,226 F.3d 445 (6th Cir. 2000) — 10:407

Hochberg v. O’Donnell’s Restaurant, Inc., 272A.2d 846 (D.C. App. 1971) — 11:8

Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 426N.W.2d 826 (Minn. 1988) — 5:84, 5:116

Hodge v. Middletown Hosp. Assn., 581 N.E.2d529 (Ohio 1991) — 12:129

Hodges v. S. C. Toof & Co., 833 S.W.2d 896(Tenn. 1992) — 7:307

Hoff v. Zimmer, 746 F.Supp. 872(W.D.Wis.1990) — 4:69

Hoffman v. Sabre Marine, Inc., 407 So.2d 516(La.App. 1981) — 2:192

Hoffman v. United States, 767 F.2d 1431 (9thCir. 1986) — 12:191, 12:194

Hoffman-Rattet v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.,516 N.Y.S.2d 856 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1987) —10:153

Hollenbeck v. Selectone Corp., 476 N.E.2d 746(Ill. App. 1985) — 6:102

Hollinger v. Shoppers Paradise of New Jersey,340 A.2d 687 (N.J. Super. L. 1975) —3:145–46

Holloway v. General Motors Corp., ChevroletDivision, 250 N.W.2d 736 (Mich. 1977) —10:115

Holman v. BIC Corp., 925 S.W.2d 527 (Tenn.1996) — 4:262, 4:270, 4:284, 4:293

Holmes v. American States Ins. Co., 1 P.3d 552(Utah App. 2000) — 3:19

Holt v. Deere & Co., 24 F.3d 1289 (10th Cir.1994) — 8:55–56

Holt v. Stihl, Inc., 449 F.Supp. 693 (E.D.Tenn.1977) — 8:120

Hon v. Stroh Brewery Co., 835 F.2d 510 (3rdCir. 1987) — 5:171

Honda of America Mfg., Inc. v. Norman, 104S.W.3d 600 (Tex. App. 2003) — 4:152–53

Honeywell, Inc. v. Minnesota Life and Health Ins.Co., 110 F.3d 547 (8th Cir. 1997)—12:169

Hoover v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., 528P.2d 76 (Or. 1974) — 4:60–61

Hopkins v. Dow Corning Corp., 33 F.3d 1116(9th Cir. 1994) — 10:432

Horn v. Thoratec Corp., 376 F.3d 163 (3rd Cir.2004) — 5:357

Horner v. Spalitto, 1 S.W.3d 519 (Mo. App.1999) — 11:176

Horstman v. Farris, 725 N.E.2d 698 (Ohio App.1999) — 5:120, 6:119–21

Hoskins v. Business Men’s Assurance, 79 S.W.3d901 (Mo. 2002) — 12:28

House v. Armour of America, Inc., 886 P.2d542 (Utah App. 1994) — 5:200–01, 10:153

Houseman v. U.S. Aviation Underwriters, 171F.3d 1117 (7th Cir. 1999) — 10:277,10–283

Howell v. Clyde, 620 A.2d 1107 (Pa. 1993) —8:1

Howell v. Luckey, 518 S.E.2d 873 (W.Va.1999) — 9:110

Howell v. Methodist Health Care Jackson Hos-pitals, 856 So.2d 353 (Miss. App. 2003) —10:28

HTP, Ltd. v. Lineas Aereas Costarricenses, S.A.,685 So.2d 1238 (Fla. 1996) — 7:262

Hubbard v. General Motors Corp., 1996 WL274018 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) — 3:107

Hubbard v. McDonough Power Equipment,Inc., 404 N.E.2d 311 (Ill. App. 1980) —10:59

Hubbard-Hall Chemical Co. v. Silverman, 340F.2d 402 (1st Cir. 1965) — 4:323, 4:361

Huddell v. Levin, 537 F.2d 726 (3rd Cir.1976) — 10:345, 10:358–61

Hudiberg Chevrolet, Inc. v. General MotorsCorp., 114 S.W.3d 680 (Tex. App. 2003) —6:11

Huffman v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 645 F.Supp.909 (D.Colo.1986) — 8:153

Hughes v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., 522 N.W.2d294 (Iowa 1994) — 4:211

Humber v. Morton, 426 S.W.2d 554 (Tex.1968) — 4:394

Humes v. Clinton, 792 P.2d 1032 (Kan.1990) — 11:93

Hunt v. Ferguson-Paulus Enterprises, 415 P.2d13 (Or. 1966) — 11:26

Huron Tool and Engineering Co. v. PrecisionConsulting Services, Inc., 532 N.W.2d 541(Mich. App. 1995) — 7:256–61

Hutchins v. Schwartz, 724 P.2d 1194 (Alaska1986) — 8:187, 8:190

Hydraform Prods. Corp. v. American Steel &Aluminum Corp., 498 A.2d 339 (N.H.1985) — 7:29

Hyjek v. Anthony Industries, 944 P.2d 1036(Wash. 1997) — 4:154

Hymon v. Blaw Knox Co., 511 F.Supp. 646(E.D.Pa 1981) — 6:142, 6:147–48

Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly and Co., 541 N.Y.S.2d 941(N.Y. 1989) — 10:220, 10:225–26, 10:318,10:327–29

TABLE OF CASES xli

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xli

Page 42: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Hyundi Motor Co. v. Rodriguez, 995 S.W.2d661 (Tex. 1999) — 3:41

Ice Bowl, LLC v. Weigel Broadcasting Co., 14F.Supp.2d 1080 (E.D.Wis. 1998) — 7:265,7:266

Idaho Dept. of Labor v Sunset Marts, Inc., 91P.3d 1111 (Idaho 2004) — 12:101

Imperial Stamp and Engraving Co., Inc. v. Bai-ley, 403 N.E.2d 294 (Ill. App. 1980) —3:211

Imperial Supply Co., Inc. v. Westwind Cosmet-ics, Inc., 829 F.Supp. 35 (E.D.N.Y. 1993) —3:169

Indianapolis Athletic Club, Inc. v. Alco Stan-dard Corp., 709 N.E.2d 1070 (Ind. App.1999) — 4:203

Indust-Ri-Chem Laboratory, Inc. v. Par-PakCo., Inc., 602 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. Civ. App.1980) — 3:69

Inland/Riggle Oil Co. v. Painter, 925 P.2d 1083(Colo. 1996) — 8:100–01

Insolia v. Philip Morris Inc., 216 F.3d 596 (7thCir. 2000) — 4:142

Insurance Co. of North America v. Cease Elec.Co., 674 N.W.2d 886 (Wis. App. 2003) —7:255, 7:268

Insurance. Co. of North America v. Paskarnis,451 So.2d 447 (Fla. 1984) — 8:197

International Harvester Co. v. Lawyer, 155 P.617 (Okla. 1916) — 3:99–100

International Petroleum Services Inc. v. S & NWell Service, Inc., 639 P.2d 29 (Kan.1982) — 3:193

Investors Premium Corp v. Burroughs Corp.,389 F.Supp. 39 (D.S.C. 1974) — 3:201

Ives v. South Buffalo Ry., 94 N.E. 431 (N.Y.1911) — 4:9

Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 781 F.2d394 (5th Cir. 1986) — 7:286

Jacobs Pharmacy Co. v. Gipson, 159 S.E.2d 171(Ga. App. 1967) — 11:199–201

Jacobs v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 67F.3d 1219 (6th Cir. 1995) — 4:170

James River Equipment Co. v. Beadle CountyEquipment, Inc., 646 N.W.2d 265 (S.D.2002) — 10:7

James v. Meow Media, Inc., 300 F.3d 683 (6thCir. 2002) — 4:427

James v. Strange, 407 U.S. 128 (1972) — 12:304Janelsins v. Button, 648 A.2d 1039 (Md. App.

1994) — 8:35Janssen v. Hook, 272 N.E.2d 385 (Ill. App.

1971) — 3:193

Jeannelle v. Thompson Medical Co., Inc., 613F.Supp. 346 (D.Mo. 1985) — 7:79

Jeffries v. Clark’s Restaurant Enterprises, Inc.,580 P.2d 1103 (Wash. App. 1978) — 11:8

Jenkins v. United States, 307 F.2d 637 (D.C. Cir.1962) — 10:408

Jennings v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 14 P.3d596 (Or. 2000) — 10:433

Jennings v. BIC Corp., 181 F.3d 1250 (11th Cir.1999) — 4:98

Jensen v. Seigel Mobile Homes Group, 668 P.2d65 (Idaho 1983) — 3:197

Jenson v. Eveleth Traconite Co., 130 F.2d 1287(8th Cir. 1997) — 6:161

Jessop v. Angelo Benedetti, Inc., 2003 WL23114 (Ohio App. 2003) — 4:387–88

Jimenez v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., 269 F.3d439 (4th Cir. 2001) — 2:174–75

Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., 904 P.2d861 (Ariz. 1995) — 8:213

Jimenez v. Superior Court, 58 P.3d 450 (Cal.2002) — 4:418

Jimenez v. Gulf & Western ManufacturingCompany, 458 So.2d 58 (Fla. App.1984) — 4:75, 4:238–39

JKT Co., Inc. v. Hardwick, 265 S.E.2d 510 (S.C.1980) — 3:28

Johansen v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., 834F. Supp. 404 (S.D.Ga. 1993) — 7:54

John & Jane Roes, 1-100 v. FHP, Inc., 985 P.2d666 (Haw. 1999) — 7:123

Johnson & Johnson v. Aetna Casualty andSurety Co., 667 A.2d 1087 (N.J. Super.App. Div. 1995) — 7:283

Johnson v. Anderson Ford, Inc., 686 So.2d 224(Ala. 1996) — 3:20

Johnson v. Clark Equipment Co., 547 P.2d 132(Or. 1976) — 8:75–78

Johnson v. Hannibal Mower Corp., 679 S.W.2d884 (Mo. App. 1984) — 10:42

Johnson v. John Deere Co., a Div. of Deere &Co., 935 F.2d 151 (8th Cir. 1991) —12:306–07, 12:309–10

Johnson v. Land O’Lakes, Inc., 18 F.Supp.2d985 (N.D.Iowa 1998) — 7:254

Johnson v. Miller, 371 N.W.2d 94 (Minn. App.1985) — 8:148–49

Johnson v. Niagra Machine & Tool Works, 555So.2d 88 (Ala. 1989) — 4:239

Johnson v. Paraplane Corp., 460 S.E.2d 398(S.C. App. 1995) — 8:5

Johnson v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 740 P.2d548 (Haw. 1987) — 4:203, 4:213, 4:336

xlii TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xlii

Page 43: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Johnson v. St. Vincent’s Hospital, 404 N.E.2d585 (Ind. 1980) — 12:287

Johnson v. T. L. James & Co., Inc., 809 So.2d287 (La. App. 2001) — 4:170

Johnson, United States v., 319 U.S. 503(1943) — 10:379

Johnston v. United States, 597 F.Supp. 374(D.Kan. 1984) — 10:437–38

Johnstone v. American Oil Co., 17 F.3d 1217(5th Cir. 1993) — 4:161

Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Liti-gation, In re, 758 F.Supp. 199 (S.D.N.Y.1991) — 10:439

Jones v. American Tobacco Co., 17 F.Supp.2d706 (N.D.Ohio 1998) — 2:21

Jones v. Bennett, 703 A.2d 1008 (N.J. 1998) —1:127

Jones v. Cranman’s Sporting Goods, 237 S.E.2d402 (Ga. App. 1977) — 3:64–65

Jones v. Ford Motor Co., 559 S.E.2d 592 (Va.2002) — 8:93

Jones v. Hittle Service, 549 P.2d 1383 (Kan.1976) — 5:184

Jones v. J.B. Lippincott Co., 694 F.Supp. 1216(D.Md. 1988) — 4:425–26, 4:431

Jones v. Kellner, 451 N.E.2d 548 (Ohio App.1982) — 3:103

Jones v. Rath Packing Co., 430 U.S. 519(1977) — 5:302

Jones v. State Board of Medicine, 555 P.2d 399(Idaho 1976) — 12:287

Jordan v. Sunnyslope Appliance Propane &Plumbing Supplies Co., 660 P.2d 1236(Ariz. 1983) — 4:442

Jorgensen v. Meade Johnson Laboratories,Inc., 483 F.2d 237 (10th Cir. 1973) —5:62–64

Jourdain v. Dineen, 527 A.2d 1304 (Me.1987) — 2:134, 2:135

Junikki Imports, Inc. v. Toyota Motor Co., 335F.Supp. 593 (D.Ill. 1971) — 2:98

Jupiter Inlet Corp. v. Brocard, 546 So.2d 1 (Fla.App. 1988) — 10:76

Jurado v. Western Gear Works, 619 A.2d 1312(N.J. 1993) — 4:76, 4:92–93

Justin v. Guardian Ins. Co., 670 F. Supp. 614(D.V.I. 1987) — 7:307

Kaczkowski v. Bolubesz, 421 A.2d 1027 (Pa.1980) — 7:70

Kaempfe v. Lehn & Fink Products, Corp., 249N.Y.S.2d 840 (App. Div. 1964) — 5:252

Kaiserman v. Bright, 377 N.E.2d 261 (Ill. App.1978) — 7:140

Kalik v. Allis-Chalmers Corp., 658 F.Supp. 631(W.D.Pa. 1987) — 4:104

Kalinowski v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co.,851 F. Supp. 149 (E.D.Pa. 1994)—4:345–46

Kallio v. Ford Motor Co., 407 N.W.2d 92(Minn. 1987) — 4:171–73

Kansas City Southern Ry. Co., Inc. v. Johnson,798 So.2d 374 (Miss. 2001) — 7:68

Kansas Malpractice Victims Coalition v. Bell,757 P.2d 251 (Kan. 1988) — 12:202

Kansas Pac. Ry. Co. v. Dunmeyer, 19 Kan. 539(1878) — 12:232

Karibjanian v. Thomas Jefferson Univ. Hosp.,717 F.Supp. 1081 (E.D.Pa.1989) — 4:69

Karns v. Emerson Elec. Co., 817 F.2d 1452(10th Cir. 1987) — 4:173, 10:388–89,10:394–95

Kassab v. Central Soya, 246 A.2d 848 (Pa.1968) — 3:158

Kately v. Wilkinson, 195 Cal. Rptr. 902 (Cal.App. 1983) — 7:154–57

Katz v. Slade, 460 S.W.2d 608 (Mo. 1970) —4:36

Kaydon Acquisition Corp. v. Custum Mfg., Inc.,301 F.Supp. 2d 945 (N.D.Iowa 2004) —9:44, 9:101

Kearl v. Lederle Laboratories, 218 Cal. Rptr. 453(Cal. App. 1985) — 11:39–43

Keck v. Dryvit Systems, Inc., 830 So.2d 1 (Ala.2002) — 4:417, 4:419

Keen v. Ashot Ashkelon, Ltd., 748 S.W.2d 91(Tex. 1988) — 8:50–52

Keen v. Dominick’s Finer Foods, Inc., 364N.E.2d 502 (Ill. App. 1977) — 4:39–40

Keene v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc., 121F.Supp.2d 1063 (E.D.Tex. 2000) — 5:181

Keller v. Welles Dept. Store of Racine, 276N.W.2d 319 (Wis. App. 1979) — 4:138,4:140

Kelley v. Hanover Ins. Co., 722 So.2d 1133 (La.App. 1998) — 5:120

Kelley v. John R. Dailey Co., 181 P. 326 (Mont.1919) — 1:106

Kelley v. R.G. Indus., Inc., 497 A.2d 1143 (Md.1985) — 4:176

Kelly v. Hanscom Bros., Inc., 331 A.2d 737 (Pa.Super. 1974) — 9:72–73

Kelly v. Rival Mfg. Co., 704 F. Supp. 1039(W.D.Okla. 1989) — 4:142

Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.,551 P.2d 671 (Okla. App. 1975) — 9:37–42

Keltner v. Ford Motor Co., 748 F.2d 1265 (8thCir.1984) — 8:153

TABLE OF CASES xliii

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xliii

Page 44: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Kemp v. Medtronic, Inc., 231 F.3d 216 (6th Cir.2000) — 1:93–94, 1:100

Kennedy v. Collagen Corp., 161 F.3d 1226 (9thCir. 1995) — 10:432

Kennedy v. Cumberland Engineering Co., Inc.,471 A.2d 195 (R.I. 1984) — 12:275

Kennedy v. Flo-Tronics, Inc., 143 N.W.2d 827(Minn. 1966) — 2:95

Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Auto Crane Co., 674S.W.2d 15 (Ky. 1983) — 5:157

Keogh v. W.R. Grasle, Inc., 816 P.2d 1343(Alaska 1991) — 10:6, 10:45

Kerns v. Engelke, 369 N.E.2d 1284 (Ill. App.1977) — 6:68–71

Keys v. Rehabilitation Centers, Inc., 574 So.2d579 (Miss. 1990) — 9:101

Kiessling v. Northwest Greyhound Lines, 229P.2d 335 (Wash. 1951) — 10:373–74

Kilgore v. Shepard Co., 158 A. 720 (R.I.1932) — 10:110–11

Kimbell Foods, Inc., United States v., 440 U.S.715 (1979) — 5:488

King v. Danek Medical, Inc., 37 S.W.3d 429(Tenn. App. 2000) — 1:74

King v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Co., 996F.2d 1346 (1st Cir. 1993) — 5:351

King v. Ford Motor Co., 209 F.3d 886 (6th Cir.2000) — 5:186

Kings County Tobacco Litigation, In re, 727N.Y.S.2d 241 (N.Y. Sup. 2000) — 10:183

Kinsman Transit Co., Petition of, 338 F.2d 708(2d Cir. 1964) — 7:198–200

Kinsman Transit Co., Petition of, 388 F.2d 821(2d Cir. 1968) — 7:198, 7:201

Kirashige v. Indian Dunes, Inc. 246 Cal. Rptr.310 (Cal. App. 1988) — 8:6

Kirk v. Denver Publishing Co., 818 P.2d 262(Colo. 1991) — 7:309, 12:28

Kirk v. Michael Reese Hosp. and Medical Cen-ter, 513 N.E.2d 387 (Ill. 1987) — 5:30–31

Kirk v. Stineway Drug Store Co., 187 N.E.2d307 (Ill. App. 1963) — 3:220

Kirkland v. Blaine County Medical Center, 4 P.3d1115 (Idaho 2000)—12:215, 12:218, 12:346

Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp., 783 F.2d 1337(9th Cir. 1986) — 4:336, 4:338

Kitchens v. Winter Co. Builders, Inc., 289S.W.2d 807 (Ga. App. 1982) — 8:66

Klages v. General Ordnance Equipment Corp.,367 A.2d 304 (Pa. Super. 1976) —2:274–77, 6:98–99

Klempka v. G.D. Searle & Co., 769 F. Supp.1061 (D.Minn.1991) — 11:93

Klingshirn v. McNeal, 520 S.E.2d 761 (Ga. App.1999) — 7:56–57

Kloepfer v. Honda Motor Co., 898 F.2d 1452(10th Cir. 1990) — 10:145

KLPR T.V., Inc. v. Visual Elec. Corp., 465 F.2d1382 (8th Cir. 1972) — 3:104

Kluger v. White, 281 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1973) —12:276–77

K-Mart Corp. v. Chairs, Inc., 506 So.2d 7 (Fla.App. 1987) — 9:78

Knapp Shoes, Inc. v. Sylvania Shoe Mfg. Corp.,72 F.3d 190 (1st Cir. 1995)—3:53–54, 3:179

Kneibel v. RRM Enterprises, 506 N.W.2d 664(Minn. App. 1993) — 11:25–26

Knight v. Jewett, 11 Cal. Rptr. 2d 2 (Cal.1992) — 8:151

Knight v. Just Born, Inc., 2000 WL 924624(D.Or. 2000) — 11:3–4

Kocienba v. G.D. Searle & Co., 680 F.Supp.1293 (D.Minn. 1988) — 11:52

Koellmer v. Chrysler Motors Corp., 276 A.2d807(Conn. Cir. Ct. App. Div. 1970)—3:155

Kohl v. American Home Products Corp., 78F.Supp.2d 885 (W.D.Ark. 1999) — 11:142

Koonce v. Quaker Safety Products & Mfg. Co.,798 F.2d 700 (5th Cir. 1986) — 5:202,5:205–06

Koons v. Shelbourne Motor Co., 31 P.2d 573(Okla. 1934) — 7:168

Kosters v. Seven-Up Co., 595 F.2d 347 (6th Cir.1979) — 4:50–52

Kotler v. American Tobacco Co., 731 F.Supp. 50(D.Mass. 1990) — 4:178

Kozlowski v. John E. Smith’s Sons Co., 275N.W.2d 915 (1979) — 5:108–10

Kramer Service v. Wilkins, 186 So. 625 (Miss.1939) — 10:137–38

Kramer v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 520 So.2d 37(Fla. 1988) — 3:34–35, 3:37, 3:149

Kramer v. Showa Denko K.K., 929 F.Supp. 733(S.D.N.Y. 1996) — 7:20

Krasney-Kaplan Corp. v. Flo-Tork, Inc., 1991WL 199532 (Ohio App. 1991) — 9:45

Krause v. Sud-Aviation, Societe Nationale DeConstructions Aeronautiques, 301 F.Supp513 (S.D.N.Y. 1968) — 3:143

Krengel v. Midwest Automatic Photo, Inc., 203N.W.2d 841 (Minn. 1973) — 10:239,10:242–44

Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc., 74 Cal. Rptr.749 (Cal. App. 1969) — 4:390–91, 4:393

Kroger Co. v. Beck, 375 N.E.2d 640 (Ind. App.1978) — 7:76

xliv TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xliv

Page 45: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Kroger v. Bauer, 117 P.2d 50, 52 (Cal. App.1941) — 7:190

Krueger v. General Motors Co., 783 P.2d 1340(Mont. 1989) — 4:152, 10:145

Kubrick, United States v., 444 U.S. 111(1979) — 5:420

Kudlacek v. Fiat S.p.A., 509 N.W.2d 603 (Neb.1994) — 4:214

Kuhnert v. John Morrell & Co. Meat Packing,Inc., 5 F.3d 303 (8th Cir. 1993) — 5:275

Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S.137 (1999) — 10:459:61, 10:465

Kwipco, Inc. v. General Trailer Co., Inc., 515P.2d 1317 (Or. 1973) — 7:30

“L” Investments, Ltd., v. Lynch, 322 N.W.2d651 (Neb. 1982) — 7:52

LaBelle ex rel. LaBelle v. Philip Morris, Inc.,243 F.Supp.2d 508 (D.S.C. 2001) — 4:170

LaBelle v. McCauley Indus. Corp., 649 F.2d 46(1st Cir. 1981) — 5:79

Lacy v. G.D. Searle & Co., 567 A.2d 398 (Del.1989) — 11:93

LaGrotte v. Bottling Co., 70 Pa. D. & C. 145(1948) — 7:32

Lahocki v. Contee Sand & Gravel Co., Inc.,398 A.2d 490 (Md. App. 1979) —10:347–49

LaHue v. General Motors Corp., 716 F. Supp.407 (W.D.Mo. 1989) — 8:196, 8:199

Laidlow v. Hariton Machinery Co., 790 A.2d884 (N.J. 2002) — 5:267

Laird v. Nelms, 406 U.S. 797 (1972) — 5:440Lakeman v. Otis Elevator Co., 930 F.2d 1547

(11th Cir. 1991) — 4:346Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc., 987 P.2d 463 (Or.

1999) — 12:202, 12:203, 12:205–09Lamb v. York, 247 N.E.2d 197 (Ind. 1969) —

10:390Lambertson v. Cincinnati Welding Corp., 257

N.W.2d 679 (Minn. 1977) — 9:135Lamkin v. Towner, 563 N.E.2d 449 (Ill. 1990) —

4:266, 4:276–77Lamson v. American Axe & Tool Co., 58 N.E.

585 (Mass. 1900) — 8:61Lancaster Silo & Block Co. v. Northern Propane

Gas Co., 427 N.Y.S.2d 1009 (App. Div.1980) — 10:54

Landrigan v. Celotex Corp., 605 A.2d 1079 (N.J.1992) — 10:440, 10:442

Lane v. C.A. Swanson & Sons, 278 P.2d 723(Cal. App. 1955) — 3:45–48

Lang v. Brom Builders, Inc., 1998 WL 57788(Conn. Super. 1998) — 4:415

Lange v. Hoyt, 159 A. 575 (Conn. 1932) —8:177

Langiulli v. Bumble Bee Seafood, Inc., 604N.Y.S.2d 1020 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1993) — 11:8

Langridge v. Levy, 150 Eng. Rep. 863 (Ex.1837) — 2:3–4, 2:57, 2:129, 4:18, 5:127

Lankford v. Sullivan, Long & Hagerty, 416So.2d 996 (Ala. 1982) — 12:268–75

Larkin v. Pfizer, Inc., G.D. Searle & Co., 2004WL 1361954 (Ky. 2004) — 11:92

Larsen v. General Motors Corp., 391 F.2d 495(8th Cir. 1968) — 4:88–89

Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems, Inc., 837 P.2d 1273,1292 (Haw. 1992)—3:148, 7:79, 8:129

Larson Mach., Inc. v. Wallace, 600 S.W.2d 1(Ark. 1980) — 9:23

Larson v. St. Francis Hotel, 188 P.2d 513 (Cal.App. 1948) — 10:169

Lasley v. Shrake’s Country Club Pharmacy, Inc.,880 P.2d 1129 (Ariz. App. 1994) —5:37–38, 11:176, 11:177–78

Laurens Electric Co-op, Inc. v. Altec Industries,Inc., 889 F.2d 1323 (4th Cir. 1989) — 7:242

Lawrence W. Inlow Accident Litigation, In re,2002 WL 970403 (S.D.Ind. 2002) — 5:185

Lawson v. Smith and Nepheew Richards, Inc.,1999 WL 1129677 (N.D.Ga. 1999) —2:70–71, 2:73

Lawton v. Alpine Engineered Products, Inc.,498 So.2d 879 (Fla. 1986) — 5:275

Layman v. Uniroyal, Inc., 558 S.W.2d 220 (Mo.App. 1977) — 9:110

Leaf v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 590N.W.2d 525 (Iowa 1999) — 10:74

Learjet Corp. v. Spenlinhauer, 901 F.2d 198 (1stCir. 1990) — 2:77–79

Lecates v. Hertrich Pontiac Buick Co., 515 A.2d163 (Del.Super. 1986) — 8:31

LeCroy v. Hanlon, 713 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.1986) — 12:200–01

Lederman v. Pacific Industries, 119 F.3d 551(7th Cir. 1997) — 5:181

Lee v. Electric Motor Div., 215 Cal. Rptr. 195(1985) — 4:108

Lee v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 688 P.2d1283 (Okla. 1984) — 10:342–44, 10:346,10:350–51, 10:353

Leesley v. West, 518 N.W.2d 758 (Ill. App.1988) — 11:169

Lefever v. K.P. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc., 734A.2d 290 (N.J. 1999) — 10:253

Le Lievre v. Gould, [1893] 1 Q.B. 491 (C.A.) —5:8

TABLE OF CASES xlv

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xlv

Page 46: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Leng v. Celotex Corp., 554 N.E.2d 468 (Ill. App.1990) — 10:333

Lenhardt v. Ford Motor Co., 683 P.2d 1097(Wash. 1984) — 10:58–59

Leonard v. Uniroyal, Inc., 765 F.2d 560 (6th Cir.1985) — 5:202

Leong v. Sears Roebuck and Co., 970 P.2d 972(Haw. 1998) — 4:385–86

Lerma v. Keck, 921 P.2d 28 (Ariz. App. 1996) —12:318–19

Lerman v. Heeman, 701 A.2d 426 (Md.1997) — 9:25

Lewis & Lambert Metal Contractors, Inc. v.Jackson, 914 S.W.2d 584 (Tex. App.1994) — 2:256–57

Lewis River Golf, Inc., v. O.M. Scott & Sons,845 P.2d 987 (Wash. 1993) — 7:29

Lewis v. American Cyanamid Co., 715 A.2d 967(N.J. 1998) — 4:215, 4:218–19, 10:6

Lewis v. Mobil Oil Corp., 438 F.2d 500 (8th Cir.1971) — 3:182–84

Lewis, United States v., 797 F.2d 358 (7th Cir.1986) — 6:105

Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 532 P.2d 1226 (Cal.1975) — 8:94

Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Sears, Roebuck andCo., 406 A.2d 1254 (Conn. Super. 1979) —10:6

Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants, P.T.S., Inc.,No. CV-93-02419, 1995 WL 360309 (N.M.Dist. 1999) — 12:139

Lightner v. Duke Power Co., 719 F.Supp. 1310(D.S.C. 1989) — 9:4–6

Lilley v. Board of Sup’rs of Louisiana State Uni-versity, 735 So.2d 696 (La. App. 1999) —7:130–31

Lindberg Cadillac Co. v. Aron, 371 S.W.2d 651(Mo. App. 1963) — 2:9, 2:120

Lindgren v. New York City Housing Authority,704 N.Y.S.2d 30 (App. Div. 2000) — 7:289

Lindsay v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 637F.2d 87 (2nd Cir.1980) — 11:93

Lindsey v. Mitchell, 544 A.2d 1298 (Me.1988) — 8:180

Lindy Homes, Inc. v. Evans Supply Co., Inc., 357So.2d 996 (Ala. Civ. App. 1978)—3:180–81

Linegar v. Armour of America, Inc., 909 F.2d1150 (8th Cir. 1990) — 4:230–33

Lipscomb v. Diamiani, 226 A.2d 914 (Del.Super. 1967) — 8:189

Liquidation of American Mutual Liability Ins.Co., In re, 747 N.E.2d 1215 (Mass.2001) — 12:65

Liriano v. Hobart Corp., 132 F.3d 124 (2nd Cir.1998) — 4:328

Liriano v. Hobart Corp., 677 N.Y.S.2d 764 (N.Y.1998) — 4:381, 5:117–19, 5:237

Lithgow v. Hamilton, 69 So.2d 776 (Fla.1954) — 7:179

Little v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., 227 F.Supp.2d838 (S.D.Ohio 2002) — 11:133

Little v. Williamson, 441 N.E.2d 974 (Ind. Ct.App. 1982) — 7:141

Livingston v. Begay, 652 P.2d 734 (N.M.1982) — 4:402

Lobianco v. Property Protection, Inc., 437 A.2d417 (Pa. Super. 1981) — 4:111, 4:304–06

Lockhard v. Coastal Coal Co., LLC, 2003 WL22076561 (W.D.Va. 2002) — 8:144, 8:147

Lockhart v. Besel, 426 P.2d 605 (Wash. 1967) —7:179

Logan v. Greenwich Hosp. Ass’n, 465 A.2d 294(Conn. 1983) — 11:99

Logan v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 219 S.E.2d685 (Va. 1975) — 3:143, 3:144

Loitz v. Remington Arms Co., Inc., 532 N.E.2d1091 (Ill. App. 1988) — 10:40

Loitz v. Remington Arms Co., Inc., 563 N.E.2d397 (Ill. 1990) — 10:40

Long v. McAllister, 319 N.W.2d 256 (Iowa1982) — 7:60, 7:61

Long v. Omaha & C.B. St. R. Col, 187 N.W 930(Neb. 1922) — 6:167

Lonkowski v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 1996WL 888182 (W.D.La. 1996) 4:214

Lopez v. McDonald’s Corp., 238 Cal. Rptr. 436(Cal. App. 1987) — 6:31

Lorenz v. Celotex Corp., 896 F.2d 148 (5th Cir.1990) — 10:87–88

Lorfano v. Dura Stone Steps, Inc., 569 A.2d 195(Me. 1990) — 3:193

Losee v. Buchanan, 51 N.Y. 442 (1873) — 4:6Lough by Lough v. Rolla Women’s Clinic, Inc.,

866 S.W.2d 851 (Mo. 1983) — 5:72–73Loughan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 749

F.2d 1519 (11th Cir. 1985) — 5:207–09Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. M/V Testbank, 752

F.2d 1019 (5th Cir. 1985) — 7:204Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm’n v. F.C.C., 476

U.S. 355 (1986) — 5:301Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. Roberts, 269

S.W. 333 (Ky. App. 1925) — 7:95Lovick v. Wil-Rich, 588 N.W.2d 688 (Iowa

1999) — 4:173Lowe v. General Motors Corp., 624 F.2d 1373

(5th Cir. 1980) — 1:76, 1:78, 1:89, 1:112

xlvi TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xlvi

Page 47: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Lowe v. Sporicidin Int’l, 477 F.3d 124 (4th Cir.1995) — 3:193

Lucas v. Caron, 196 N.W.2d 819 (Mich. App.1972) — 1:116–17

Lucas v. United States, 757 S.W.2d 687 (Tex.1988) — 12:199, 12:233, 12:244, 12:246,12:254–55

Lucas v. United States, 807 F.2d 414 (5th Cir.1986) — 12:174–75, 12:181–82, 12:199,12:245

Lunghi v. Clark Equipment Co., 200 Cal.Rptr.387 (Cal. App. 1984) — 5:92

Lynch v. Scheininger , 744 A.2d 113 (N.J.2000) — 5:61, 5:74

MacDonald v. General Motors Corp., 784F.Supp. 486 (M.D.Tenn. 1992) — 8:200

MacDonald v. Mobley, 555 S.W.2d 916 (Tex.Civ. App. 1977) — 3:215

MacDonald v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.,475 N.E.2d 65 (Mass. 1985) — 1:41–42,1:127, 10:77, 11:91–92

MacDougall v. Ford Motor Co., 257 A.2d 676(Pa. Super. 1969) — 10:124

Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Conkle, 436 S.E.2d 635(Ga. 1993) — 12:28

Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Tackett, 841 So.2d 1107(Miss. 2003) — 12:91–92

Mack v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 169F.R.D. 671 (M.D.Ala. 1996) — 2:88

Mackowick v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 575A.2d 100 (Pa. 1990) — 4:312, 4:315, 4:325,4:338, 4:364

MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382,111 N.E. 1050 (1916) — 5:131, 5:135–37

MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 145 N.Y.S. 462(App. Div. 1914) — 5:134

MacPherson v. Searle & Co., 775 F. Supp. 417(D.D.C.1991) — 11:93

Madison v. American Home Products Corp.,595 S.E.2d 493 (S.C. 2004) — 11:146

Madison v. Superior Court, 250 Cal. Rptr. 299(Cal. App. 1988) — 8:6

Madrid v. Lincoln County Medical Center, 923P.2d 1154 (N.M. 1996) — 7:123

Maertin v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.,1998 WL 896704 (D.N.J. 1998) —7:124–25

Magliulo v. Superior Court, 121 Cal. Rptr. 621(Cal. App. 1975) — 5:279

Magnuson v. Kelsey-Hayes Co., 844 S.W.2d 448(Mo. App. 1992) — 4:106

Magrine v. Krasnica, 227 A.2d 539 (N.J. Co. Ct.1967) — 4:67

Magro v. Ragsdale Bros., Inc., 721 S.W.2d 832(Tex. 1986) — 10:153

Mahler v. Szucs, 957 P.2d 632 (Wash. 1998) —12:135

Mainline Tractor & Equipment Co., Inc. v. Nu-trite Corp., 937 F.Supp. 1095 (D.Vt.1996) — 2:141

Maize v. Atlantic Refining Co., 41 A.2d 850 (Pa.1945) — 4:352, 4:371–72

Makripodis by Makripodis v. Merrell-DowPharmaceuticals Inc., 523 A.2d 374 (Pa.Super. 1987) — 11:159–60

Malek v. Miller Brewing Co., 749 S.W.2d 521(Tex. App. 1988) — 2:268

Maltman v. Saur, 530 P.2d 254 (Wash. 1975) —5:48

Mampe v. Ayerst Laboratories, 548 A.2d 798(D.C. App. 1988) — 10:153

Mandolidis v. Elkins Industries, Inc., 246 S.E.2d907 (W.Va. 1978) — 5:273–74

Maneely v. General Motors Corp., 108 F.3d1176 (9th Cir. 1997) — 3:60–61

Manh Hung Nguyen v. Johnson Mach. & PressCorp., 433 N.E.2d 1104 (Ill. App. 1982) —10:254

Mann-Tankersly Drug Co. v. Cheairs & Son, 88S.W. 873 (Ark. 1905) — 11:204–05

Marchant v. Dayton Tire & Rubber Co., 836F.2d 695 (1st Cir. 1988) — 10:67–68

Marina Emergency Medical Group v. SuperiorCourt, 100 Cal. Rptr. 2d 866 (Cal. App.2000) — 12:121

Mark v. Rudd International, 1990 WL 250457(N.D.Ill. 1990) — 5:500

Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Bd., 706 P.2d 364(Ariz. 1985) — 5:38, 11:178

Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & WilcoxCo., 240 N.W. 392 (Wis. 1932) — 10:40

Marshall v. Celotex Corp., 651 F.Supp. 389(E.D.Mich. 1987) — 10:307

Martin v. Louisiana Dept. of Transp. and De-velopment, 665 So.2d 457 (La. App.1995) — 12:107–10

Martin v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 661N.E.2d 352 (Ill. 1996) — 11:93

Martin v. Richie, 711 N.E.2d 1273 (Ind.1999) — 12:234, 12:317

Martin v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 353 A.2d581 (Del. 1976) — 3:40, 4:34

Martin v. Shell Oil Co., 180 F.Supp.2d 313(D.Conn. 2002) — 7:135

Martin v. Volvo Cars of North America, Inc.,661 N.Y.S.2d 338 (App. Div. 1997) — 6:161

TABLE OF CASES xlvii

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xlvii

Page 48: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Martinez v. Clark Equipment Co., 382 So.2d878 (Fla. App. 1980) — 8:210

Martinez-Ferrer v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.,164 Cal. Rptr. 591 (Cal. App. 1980) —12:46–52

Marzullo v. Crosman Corp., 289 F.Supp. 2d1337 (M.D.Fla. 2003) — 5:175–77

Masaka v. General Motors Corp., 780 P.2d 566(Haw. 1989) — 7:287

Massey v. Sullivan County, 464 S.W.2d 548(Tenn. 1971) — 9:3

Massey-Ferguson v. Laird, 432 So.2d 1259 (Ala.1983) — 3:94

Matthews v. Hicks, 87 S.E.2d 629 (Va. 1955) —7:179

Matthews v. Maysville Seafoods, Inc., 602N.E.2d 764 (Ohio App. 1991) — 11:24

Matthews v. Stewart Warner Corp., 314 N.E.2d683 (1974) — 10:42

Mattingly v. Sheldon Jackson College, 743 P.2d356 (Alaska 1987) — 7:206

Mattivi v. South African Marine Corp.,Huguenot, 618 F.2d 163 (2nd Cir. 1980) —10:5

Mauch v. Manufacturers Sales & Service, Inc.,345 N.W.2d 338 (N.D. 1984) — 8:211,12:237

Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 561 A.2d257 (N.J. 1989) — 7:109

Maxey v. Freightliner Corp., 450 F.Supp. 955(N.D.Tex. 1978) — 8:57–58

Maxted v. Pacific Car & Foundry Co., 527 P.2d832 (Wyo. 1974) — 4:217

Maxwell v. Montey, 631 N.W.2d 455 (Neb.2001) — 12:86

Maynard Co-op. Co. v. Zeneca, Inc., 143 F.3d1099 (8th Cir. 1998) — 9:28–31

Maytnier v. Rush, 225 N.E.2d 83 (Ill. App.1967) — 8:136

Mazda Motor Corp. v. Lindahl, 706 A.2d 526(Del. Super. 1998) — 10:362

Mazur v. Merck & Co., Inc., 742 F.Supp. 239(E.D.Pa. 1990) — 5:315–16

McAuley v. Wills, 303 S.E.2d 258 (Ga. 1983) —5:61

McBride v. General Motors Corp., 737 F.Supp.1563 (M.D.Ga. 1990) — 12:28

McBroom v. State, 226 N.W. 2d 41 (Iowa1975) — 6:161

McCabe v. American Honda Motor Co., 123Cal. Rptr. 2d 303 (Cal. App. 2002) — 4:275

McCalla v. Harnischfeger Corp., 521 A.2d 851(N.J. Super., App. Div. 1987) — 8:65–66

McCarthy v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc., 916 F.Supp. 366 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) — 4:177

McCarthy, Lebit, Crystal & Haiman Co., LPA v.First Union Management, Inc., 622 N.E.2d1093 (Ohio App. 1993) — 7:254

McCarty v. E.J. Korvette, Inc., 347 A.2d 253(Md. App. 1975) — 3:261–63

McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp., 23 P.3d 320(Or. 2001) — 4:288–89

McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp., 985 P.2d804 (Or. App. 1999) — 4:286–87, 10:397

McColgan v. Environmental Control Systems,Inc., 571 N.E.2d 815 (Ill. App. 1991) —5:181

McCollum v. Grove Mfg. Co., 293 S.E.2d 632(N.C. App. 1982) — 5:153

McConkey v. AON Corp., 804 A.2d 572 (N.J.Super. App. Div. 2002) — 2:135

McCorkle v. Aeroglide Corp., 446 S.E.2d 145(N.C. App. 1994) — 5:270

McCormick v. Hoyt, 333 P.2d 639 (Wash.1959) — 3:220

McCorvey v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 298 F.3d1253 (11th Cir. 2002) — 6:112–14, 6:116

McCown v. International Harvester Co., 342A.2d 381 (Pa. 1975) — 8:103–04,8:157–59

McCoy v. Colonial Baking Co., 572 So.2d 850(Miss. 1990) — 7:188

McDaniel v. Bieffe USA, Inc., 35 F.Supp.2d 735(D.Minn. 1999) — 5:84, 5:113–15

McDermott, Inc. v. AmClyde, 511 U.S. 202(1994) — 8:17

McDermott, Inc. v. Clyde Iron, 979 F.2d 1068(5th Cir. 1992) — 8:17

McElrath v. Electric Investments Co., 131 N.W.380 (Minn. 1911) — 2:97

McGonigal v. Gearhart Industries, Inc., 851F.2d 774 (5th Cir. 1988) — 5:500

McGraw-Edison Co. v. Northeastern Rural Elec.Membership Corp., 678 N.E.2d 1220 (Ind.1997) — 8:29

McGregor v. Dimou, 422 N.Y.S.2d 806 (N.Y.City Ct. 1979) — 3:125

McGuire v. Davidson Mfg. Corp., 257F.Supp.2d 945 (N.D.Iowa 2003) — 4:214

McIntyre v. Balentine, 833 S.W.2d 52 (Tenn.1992) — 8:95, 8:97, 12:88

McKay v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 704 F.2d 444(9th Cir. 1984) — 5:477

McKee v. American Home Products Corp., 782P.2d 1045 (Wash. 1989) — 11:176, 11:186,11:191

xlviii TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xlviii

Page 49: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

McKee v. Moore, 648 P.2d 21 (Okla. 1982) —11:93

McKew v. Holland & Hannen & Cubitts (Scot-land) Ltd., 1969 S.L.T. 101 — 6:37, 6:40

McKew v. Holland & Hannen & Cubitts (Scot-land) Ltd., 1970 S.L.T. 68 — 6:38–39

McLaughlin v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.,181 N.E.2d 430 (N.Y. 1962) — 4:352,4:375–77

McLeod v. W.S. Merrell Co., Div. of Richard-son-Merrell Inc., 174 So.2d 736 (Fla.1965) — 11:132, 11:154, 11:203

McNally v. Nicholson Mfg. Co., 313 A.2d 913(Me. 1973) — 3:31, 5:143

McNees v. Cedar Springs Stamping Co., 457N.W.2d 68 (Mich. 1990) — 5:275

McPike v. Scheuerman, 398 P.2d 71 (Wyo.1965) — 7:179

McQuiston v. K-Mart Corp., 796 F.2d 1346(11th Cir. 1986) — 3:119, 4:45

M’Culloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819) —5:300

Mechanical Rubber and Supply Co. v. Caterpil-lar Tractor Co., 399 N.E.2d 722 (Ill. App.1980) — 4:57–58

Medina v. Graham’s Cowboys, Inc., 827 P.2d859 (N.M.App.1992) — 12:76

Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) —1:97–98, 5:355–57, 5:359–65, 5:367, 5:381

Meech v. Hillhaven West, Inc., 776 P.2d 488(Mont. 1989) — 12:223–24, 12:305

Meistrich v. Casino Arena Attractions, Inc., 155A.2d 90 (N.J. 1959) — 8:132

Melia v. Ford Motor Co., 534 F.2d 795 (8th Cir.1976) — 8:209

Melrose Intern. Trading Co. of Canada, Ltd. v.Patrick Cudahy Inc., 482 F.Supp. 1369(E.D.Wis. 1980) — 10:128, 10:131

Menard v. Newhall, 373 A.2d 505 (Vt. 1977) —10:153, 10:161

Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. v. Garten,618 A.2d 233 (Md. App. 1993)—3:143

Mercer v. Uniroyal, Inc., 361 N.E.2d 492 (OhioApp. 1976) — 5:291–92, 5:294

Mergenthaler v. Asbestos Corp., 480 A.2d 647(Del. 1984) — 7:138

Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Oxendine,649 A.2d 825 (D.C. App. 1994) — 5:304,5:313

Merrill v. Beaute Vues Corp., 235 F.2d 893(10th Cir. 1956) — 5:248

Merrill v Navegar, Inc., 28 P.3d 116 (Cal.2001) — 1:56

Merrill v. Navegar, Inc., 89 Cal. Rptr. 2d 146(Cal. App. 1999) — 1:56

Messer v. Amway Corp., 210 F.Supp.2d 1217(D.Kan. 2002) — 4:173

Messner v. Patton Electric Co., Inc., 781 F.Supp.1432 (D.Neb. 1990) — 10:145

Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (“MTBE”) ProductsLiability Litigation, In re, 175 F.Supp.2d 593(S.D.N.Y. 2001)—4:105, 10:201–04, 10:216

Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley, 521U.S. 424 (1997) — 7:112–13, 7:127–28,7:137

Metty v. Shurfine Central Corp., 736 S.W.2d527 (Mo. App. 1987) — 10:132

Meuller v. Jeffrey Mfg. Co., 494 F. Supp. 275(E.D.Pa. 1980) — 6:141, 6:143, 6:145–46

Mexicali Rose v. Superior Court, 822 P.2d 1292(Cal. 1992) — 11:5, 11:17–21

Micallef v. Miehle Co., Division of Miehle-GossDexter, Inc., 348 N.E.2d 571 (N.Y.1976) — 5:151–52

Michael v. Shiley, 46 F.3d 1316 (3rd Cir.1995) — 2:58–59

Michigan Mut. Ins. Co. v. Heatilator Fireplace,Div. of Vega Industries, Inc., 338 N.W.2d238 (Mich. App. 1983) — 5:178–79

Michigan Mut. Ins. Co. v. Heatilator Fireplace,Div. of Vega Industries, Inc., 366 N.W.2d202 (Mich. 1985) — 5:177, 5:180

Midgley v. S.S. Kresge Co., 127 Cal. Rptr. 217(Cal. App. 1976) — 4:373–74

Midwest Printing, Inc. v. AM Int’l, Inc., 108F.3d 168 (8th Cir.1997) — 2:94

Milbank v. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Proksch, 244N.W.2d 105 (Minn. 1976) — 3:28

Miles v. Naval Aviation Museum Foundation,Inc., 289 F.3d 715 (11th Cir. 2002) —5:472–73

Milgard Tempering, Inc. v. Selas Corp. ofAmerica, 902 F.2d 703 (9th Cir. 1990) —3:272–73

Militrano ex rel. Militrano v. Lederle Laborato-ries, A Div. of American Cyanamid Co.,769 N.Y.S.2d 839 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2003) —11:48, 11:222

Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1(1990) — 4:424

Miller v. Allstate Insurance Co., 573 So.2d 24(Fla. App. 1990) — 7:15–16

Miller v. Anetsberger Bros., Inc., 508 N.Y.S.2d954 (App. Div. 1986) — 4:380–81

Miller v. Cudahy Co., 858 F.2d 1449 (10th Cir.1988) — 7:46–47

TABLE OF CASES xlix

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page xlix

Page 50: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Miller v. Lee Apparel Co., Inc., 881 P.2d 576(Kan. App. 1994) — 10:82

Miller v. Miller, 160 S.E.2d 65 (N.C. 1968) —8:197

Miller v. Pilgram’s Pride Corp., 366 F.3d 672(8th Cir. 2004) — 9:131

Miller v. Todd, 551 N.E.2d 1139 (Ind. 1990) —10:336

Miller v. United States, 163 F.3d 591 (9th Cir.1998) — 5:451

Miller’s Bottled Gas, Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corp.,56 F.3d 726 (6th Cir. 1995) — 10:245

Miller’s Bottled Gas, Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corp.,955 F.2d 1043 (6th Cir. 1992) — 2:36

Millison v. E.I. du Pont Nemours & Co., 501A.2d 505 (N.J. 1985) — 5:256–57, 5:263–66

Mingolla v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co., 893F.Supp. 499, 505–06 (D.V.I. 1995) — 7:80

Minnesota Forest Products, Inc. v. Ligna Ma-chinery, Inc., 17 F.Supp.2d 892 (D.Minn.1998) — 2:96, 10:7

Mitchell v. Collagen Corp., 126 F.3d 903 (7thCir. 1997) — 1:100

Mitchell v. Collagen Corp., 870 F.Supp. 885(N.D.Ind. 1994) — 12:66

Mitchell v. Sky Climber, Inc., 487 N.E.2d 1374(Mass. 1986) — 5:241–42

Mitchell v. T.G.I. Friday’s, 748 N.E.2d 89 (OhioApp. 2000) — 11:24

Mitchell v. VLI Corp., 786 F.Supp. 966(M.D.Fla. 1992) — 3:20

Mitchell v. Volkswagenwerk, AG, 669 F.2d 1199(8th Cir. 1982) — 10:356, 10:363–64

Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co., 59 P.2d 144 (Cal.1936) — 11:5–6

Mohney v. USA Hockey, Inc., 5 Fed. Appx. 450(6th Cir. 2001) — 8:7

Mohney v. USA Hockey, Inc., 77 F.Supp.2d 859(N.D.Ohio 1999) — 8:7, 8:133

Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, 616P.2d 813 (Cal. 1980) — 7:99–102

Moning v. Alfono, 254 N.W.2d 759 (Mich.1977) — 1:12

Monsanto Co. v. Logisticon, Inc., 763 S.W.2d371 (Mo. App. 1989) — 8:79

Montgomery Elevator Co. v. McCullough, 676S.W.2d 776 (Ky. 1984) — 4:222

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Gregg, 554 N.E.2d1145 (Ind. App. 1990) — 4:211

Monusko v. Postle, 437 N.W.2d 367 (Mich App.1989) — 5:61

Moore v. Florida Rock & Tank Lines, Inc., 359S.E.2d 356 (Ga. App. 1987) — 2:63

Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass’n, 592 So.2d 156(Ala. 1991) — 12:199, 12:202, 12:296–301

Moore v. Polish Power, Inc., 720 S.W.2d 183(Tex. App. 1986) — 10:430–31

Moore v. Sitzmark Corp., 555 N.E.2d 1305(Ind. App. 1990) — 8:15–16

Moorehead v. Clark Equipment Co., 1987 WL26158 (N.D.Ill. 1987) — 5:106

Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National TankCo., 435 N.E.2d 443 (Ill. 1982) — 7:220,7:250–52

Morales v. American Home Products, 214F.Supp.2d 723 (S.D.Tex. 2002) — 11:195

Morales v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.,151 F.3d 500 (6th Cir. 1998) — 8:116

Moran v. Faberge, Inc., 332 A.2d 11 (Md.1975) — 6:59–61, 8:93

Moran v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 691 F.2d811 (6th Cir. 1982) — 11:226

Moransais v. Heathman, 744 So.2d 973 (Fla.1999) — 7:255

Moren v. Samuel M. Langston Co, 237 N.E.2d759 (Ill. App. 1968) — 10:387

Morgan v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 30 S.W.3d 455(Tex. App. 2000) — 11:180–82

Morris v. Parke, Davis & Co., 667 F.Supp. 1332(C.D.Cal. 1987) — 11:219, 11:221

Morris v. Savoy, 576 N.E.2d 765 (Ohio 1991) —12:242–43, 12:302–04

Morrison’s Cafeteria of Montgomery, Inc., 431So.2d 975 (Ala. 1983) — 11:8

Mossow v. United States, 987 F.2d 1365 (8thCir. 1993) — 5:461

Motor Homes of America, Inc. v. O’Donnell,440 So.2d 422 (Fla. App. 1983) — 3:115

Mott v. Callahan AMS Mach. Co., 416 A.2d 57(N.J. Super. App. Div. 1980) — 4:246

Motus v. Pfizer, Inc., 127 F.Supp. 2d 1085(C.D.Cal. 2000) — 11:117

Motus v. Pfizer, Inc., 196 F.Supp. 2d 984(C.D.Cal. 2001) — 10:146, 10:166

Moulton v. Alamo Ambulance Service, Inc., 414S.W.2d 444 (Tex. 1967) — 8:184

Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 323 A.2d 906(N.H. 1974) — 12:129, 12:130–31

Mountain Mobile Mix, Inc. v. Gifford, 660 P.2d883 (Colo. 1983) — 8:98

Mountain v. Procter & Gamble Co., 312 F.Supp.534 (D.Wis. 1970) — 5:253

Mozes v. Medronic, Inc., 14 F.Supp.2d 1124(D.Minn. 1998) — 10:419

Mulcahy v. Eli Lilly & Co., 386 N.W.2d 67(Iowa 1986) — 10:316–17

l TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page l

Page 51: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Muldovan v. McEachan, 523 S.E.2d 566 (Ga.1999) — 8:38, 8:40

Mulherin v. Ingersoll-Rand Co., 628 P.2d 1301(Utah 1981) — 8:216

Munn v. Algee, 924 F.2d 568 (5th Cir. 1991) —6:160, 8:172–73

Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. (4 Otto) 113 (1877) —12:262

Murphy v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., 221 Cal.Rptr. 447 (Cal. 1985) — 11:143–48,11:158

Murphy v. Edmonds, 601 A.2d 102 (Md. App.1992) — 12:214, 12:305

Murray v. Boston M.R.R., 224 A.2d (N.H.1966) — 7:308

Murray v. Fairbanks Morse, 610 F.2d 149 (3rdCir. 1979) — 8:112, 8:119

Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc., 521 So.2d 1123(La. 1988) — 8:132

Musso v. Picadilly Cafeterias, Inc., 178 So.2d421 (La. App. 1964) — 11:11, 11:13

Myers v. American Seating Co., 637 So.2d 771(La. App. 1994) — 4:94

Myrlak v. Port Authority of New York and NewJersey, 723 A.2d 45 (N.J. 1999) — 10:118,10:121

Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Elec.Co., 843 F.Supp. 1027 (D.S.C 1993) —9:32

Myvonen v. Hector Iron Co., 115 N.W. 167(Minn 1908) — 6:40

Nance v. Board of Education, 282 S.E.2d 848(S.C. 1981) — 7:178

Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co, 272 U.S.605 (1926) — 5:306

Nath v. National Equipment Leasing Corp., 439A.2d 633 (Pa. 1981) — 4:34

National Can Co. v. Vinylex Corp., 687 F.Supp.375 (N.D.Ill. 1988) — 9:16, 9:93

National Farmers Union Property & Cas. Co. v.Nelson, 147 N.W.2d 839 (Iowa 1967) —9:116

National Housing Bldg. Corp. v. Acordia of Vir-ginia Ins. Agency, Inc., 591 S.E.2d 88 (Va.2004) — 8:180

National Mutual Ins. Co. v. Whitmer, 435N.E.2d 1121 (Ohio 1982) — 9:8–10

National Premium Budget Plan Corp. v. Na-tional Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, 234 A.2d683 (N.J. Super. L. 1967) — 6:86

National R.R. Passenger Corp. v. RoundtreeTransport and Rigging, Inc., 286 F.3d 1233(11th Cir. 2002) — 1:29

Navigazione Libera Triestina Societa Anonimav. Newtown Creek Towing Co., 98 F.2d 694(2nd Cir. 1938) — 6:18

Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd., 548F.Supp. 357 (E.D.Pa. 1982) — 7:291

Neal v. Whirl Air Flow Corp., 356 N.E.2d 1173(Ill. App. 1976) — 10:384

Neder v. U.S., 527 U.S. 1 (1999) — 2:23Needham v. Fred’s Frozen Foods, Inc., 359

N.E.2d 544 (Ind. App. 1977) — 5:299Neff v. Coleco Industries, Inc., 760 F.Supp. 864

(D.Kan. 1991) — 5:181Neibarger v. Universal Cooperatives, Inc., 486

N.W.2d 612 (Mich. 1992) — 7:245–46Neiman v. Channellene Oil & Mfg. Co., 127

NW 394 (Minn. 1910) — 7:32Nelson v. Hall, 211 Cal. Rptr. 668 (Cal. App.

1985) — 8:143Nelson v. Union Equity Co-Op. Exchange, 548

S.W.2d 352 (Tex. 1977) — 3:134Neptuno Treuhand-Und Verwaltungsge-

sellschaft Mbh v. Arbor, 692 N.E.2d 812(Ill. App. 1998) — 2:178

Nero v. Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma, 892F.2d 1457 (10th Cir. 1989) — 5:424

Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, S.C. v. Gold-man, 790 N.E.2d 925 (Ill. App. 2003) —2:135

Nevada Power v. Haggerty, 989 P.2d 870 (Nev.1999) — 9:131

New York v. F.E.R.C., 535 U.S. 1 (2002) — 5:301Newman v. Ford Motor Co., 975 S.W.2d 147

(Mo. 1998) — 4:300Newmark v. Gimbell’s Inc., 246 A.2d 11 (N.J.

Super. App. Div. 1968) — 4:65–66, 4:68Nguyen v. Southwest Leasing and Rental Inc.,

282 F.3d 1061 (9th Cir. 2002) — 10:39Nichols v. Central Merchandise, Inc., 817 P.2d

1131 (Kan. App. 1991) — 11:194Nichols v. Nold, 258 P.2d 317 (Kan. 1953) —

10:118Nichols v. Westfield Industries, Ltd., 380

N.W.2d 392 (Iowa 1985) — 5:104Nicholson v. American Safety Utility Corp., 488

S.E.2d 240 (N.C. 1997) — 8:93Nicolet, Inc. v. Nutt, 525 A.2d 146 (Del.

1987) — 10:223–24Nicor Supply Ships Assocs. v. General Motors

Corp., 876 F.2d 501 (5th Cir. 1989)—7:248Niederman v. Brodsky, 261 A.2d 84 (Pa.

1970) — 7:90–91, 7:96Nielsen v. George Diamond Vogel Paint Co.,

892 F.2d 1450 (9th Cir. 1990) — 5:503

TABLE OF CASES li

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page li

Page 52: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Ninojo v. New Jersey Mfrs. Ins. Co., 802 A.2d551 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 2002) — 4:170

Nissan Motor Co. v. Armstrong, 32 S.W.3d 701(Tex. App. 2000) — 1:78

Nissan Motor Co. v. Nave, 740 A.2d 102 (Md.App. 1999) — 4:170

Nissen Trampoline Co. v. Terre Haute First Nat.Bank, 332 N.E.2d 820 (Ind. App. 1975) —10:155–57

Nordstrom v. White Metal Rolling & Stamp-ing Corp., 453 P.2d 619 (Wash. 1969) —10:20

Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Liti-gation, In re, 955 F.Supp. 700 (E.D.Tex.1997) — 11:100

North American Chemical Co. v. SuperiorCourt, 69 Cal. Rptr. 2d 466 (Cal. App.1997) — 9:33

North Ridge Corp. v. Walraven, 957 S.W.2d 116(Tex. App. 1997) — 7:52

Northwestern Public Service v. Union CarbideCorp., 115 F.Supp. 2d 1164 (D.S.D.2000) — 7:254

Nota Const. Corp. v. Keyes Associates, Inc., 694N.E.2d 401 (Mass. App. 1998) — 7:263

Novak v. Piggly Wiggly Puget Sound Co., Inc.,591 P.2d 791 (Wash. App. 1979) — 4:142

Novosel v. Northway Motor Car Corp., 460F.Supp. 541 (N.D.N.Y. 1978) — 7:290

Nowak v. Faberge U.S.A., Inc., 812 F. Supp. 492(M.D.Pa. 1992) — 4:349

Nutting v. Ford Motor Co., 584 N.Y.S.2d 653(App. Div. 1992)—3:128–30, 4:27–29, 7:12

Oanes v. Westgo, Inc., 476 N.W.2d 248 (N.D.1991) — 12:144

O’Brien v. Cunnard S.S. Co., 28 N.E. 266(Mass. 1891) — 8:37

O’Brien v. Muskin Corp., 463 A.2d 298 (N.J.1983) — 4:164–66

Odom v. G.D. Searle & Co., 979 F.2d 1001 (4thCir.1992) — 11:93

Office Supply Co., Inc. v. Basic/Four Corp., 538F.Supp. 776 (E.D.Wis. 1982) — 3:211

Ogle v. Craig Taylor Equipment Co., 761 P.2d722 (Alaska 1988) — 9:6

Ogletree v. Navistar Intern. Transp. Corp., 500S.E.2d 570 (Ga. 1998) — 4:281, 5:153

Ohoud Establishment for Trade and Contractsv. Tri-State Contracting & Trading Corpo-ration, 523 F.Supp. 249 (D.N.J. 1981) —7:33–35, 7:39

O’Keefe v. Mercedes-Benz USA, Inc., 214 F.R.D.266 (E.D.Pa. 2003) — 7:276

Okrina v. Midwestern Corp., 165 N.W.2d 259(Minn. 1969) — 7:83–85

Okura v. United States Cycling Federation, 231Cal. Rptr. 429 (Cal. App. 1986) — 8:14

O’Laughlin v. Minnesota Natural Gas Co., 253N.W.2d 826 (Minn. 1971) — 4:409

Oliver v. Superior Court, 259 Cal. Rptr. 160(Cal. App. 1989) 4:405

Olson v. A.W. Chesterton Co., 256 N.W.2d 530(N.D. 1977) — 10:42

Olson v. Prosoco, Inc., 522 N.W.2d 284 (Iowa1994) — 1:26

Olympic Products Co., A Div. of Cone MillsCorp. v. Roof Systems Inc., 363 S.E.2d 367(N.C.App. 1988) — 8:87

O’Malley v. American LaFrance, Inc., 2002 WL32068354 (E.D.N.Y. 2002) — 4:46, 4:48

Oman v. Johns-Manville Corp., 764 F.2d 224(4th Cir. 1985) — 4:343–44

O’Neill v. Claypool, 341 S.W.2d 129 (Mo.1960) — 6:9

Ontai v. Straub Clinic & Hosp., Inc., 659 P.2d734 (Haw. 1983) — 3:147, 4:181, 4:206,4:266, 4:338

Opera v. Hyva, Inc., 450 N.Y.S.2d 615 (App.Div. 1982) — 10:42

Oppenheimer v. York International, 2002 WL31409949 (Pa. Com. Pl. 2002) — 7:276

Oregon Lumber Co. v. Dwyer Overseas TimberProducts Co., 571 P.2d 884 (Or. 1977) —3:245–46

Orfield v. International Harvester Co., 535 F.2d959 (6th Cir. 1976) — 4:234

Orr v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, 1999WL 33548162 (Ala. Cir. Ct. 1999) 11:153

Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Chapman, 388N.E.2d 541 (Ind. App. 1979) — 11:93

Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Heath, 722 P.2d410 (Colo. 1986) — 4:266, 11:52

Orthopedic Equipment Co. v. Eutsler, 276 F.2d455 (4th Cir. 1960) — 1:84–86, 1:91–92

Osborn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., 825 F.2d908 (5th Cir. 1987) — 11:206

Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood Bank, 7 Cal.Rptr. 2d 101 (Cal. App. 1992) — 10:30–33

Osborne v. Genevie, 289 So.2d 21 (Fla. App.1974) — 3:215

Osborne v. Hurst, 947 P.2d 1356 (Alaska1997) — 7:54

Oscar Mayer Corp. v. Mincing Trading Corp.,744 F.Supp. 79 (D.N.J. 1990) — 4:54–55

Osmer v. Belshe Industries, Inc., 585 So.2d 791(Ala. 1991) — 4:244–45

lii TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lii

Page 53: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Ostendorf v. Clark Equipment Co., 122 S.W.3d530 (Ky. 2003) — 4:214, 5:93, 5:95, 5:103

Otis Spunkmeyer, Inc. v. Blakely, 30 S.W.3d 678(Tex. App. 2000) — 3:135

Outboard Motor Corp. v. Schupback, 561 P.2d450 (Nev. 1977) — 5:173

Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. MillerSteamship Co., [1967] 1 A.C. 617 — 6:46

Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock &Engineering Co., Ltd., [1961] A.C. 388 —6:44–47

Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, 601 A.2d 633(Md. 1992) — 5:79, 7:307

Oza v. Sinatra, 575 N.Y.S.2d 540 (App. Div.1991) — 5:182

Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. Energy ResourcesConservation and Development Comm’n,461 U.S. 190 (1983) — 5:303

Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip, 499 U.S. 1(1991) — 7:304–05, 7:319–320

Paducah Area Public Library v. Terry, 655S.W.2d 19 (Ky. App. 1983) — 7:75

Page, United States v., 350 F.2d 28 (10th Cir.1965) — 5:443

Pagnotta v. Beall Trailers of Oregon, Inc., 991P.2d 728 (Wash. App. 2000) — 10:407

Palmer G. Lewis Co., Inc. v. ARCO ChemicalCo., 904 P.2d 1221 (Alaska 1995) — 9:47

Palmer v. A.H. Robins Co., 684 P.2d 187(Colo.1984) — 5:87

Palmer v. Hobart Corp., 849 S.W.2d 135 (Mo.App. 1993) — 9:47

Palmetto Linen Service, Inc. v. U.N.X., Inc.,205 F.3d 126 (4th Cir. 2000) — 7:243–44

Palsgraf v. Long Island R. Co., 162 N.E. 99(N.Y. 1928) — 5:11–15, 6:25—28

PAM Transport v. Freightliner Corp., 893 P.2d1295 (Ariz. 1995) — 9:90

Pan-Alaska Fisheries, Inc. v. Marine Construc-tion & Design Co., 565 F.2d 1128 (9th Cir.1977) — 8:112

Papas v. Upjohn Co., 985 F.2d 516 (11th Cir.1993) — 5:350

Papas v. Upjohn Co., 505 U.S. 1215 (1992) —5:349

Papas v. Upjohn Co., 926 F.2d 1019 (11th Cir.1991) — 5:318–19, 5:348

Papenheim v. Lovell, 530 N.W.2d 668 (Iowa1995) — 7:61

Park v. Ford Motor Co., 2002 WL 31331080(R.I. Super. 2002) — 3:171

Park v. Ford Motor Co., 844 A.2d 687 (R.I.2004) — 3:171

Parke, Davis & Co. v. Stromsodt, 411 F.2d 1390(8th Cir. 1969) — 11:63

Parker v. Highland Park, Inc., 565 S.W.2d 512(Tex. 1978) — 8:132

Parker v. Redden, 421 S.W.2d 586 (Ky. 1967) —8:132

Parker v. St. Vincent Hospital, 919 P.2d 1104(N.M. App. 1996) — 4:69

Parkinson v. Guidant Corp., 315 F.Supp. 2d 741(W.D.Pa. 2004) — 11:49–51, 11:80

Pasquale v. Speed Products Engineering, 654N.E.2d 1365 (Ill. 1995) — 7:80

Patel v. Trueblood, 666 N.E.2d 778 (Ill. App.1996) — 9:119

Patten v. Lederle Laboratories, 655 F.Supp. 745(D.Utah 1987) — 11:217, 11:218

Patton v. General Signal Corp., 984 F. Supp. 666(W.D.N.Y. 1997) — 7:135

Patton v. Hutchison Wil-Rich Mfg. Co., 861P.2d 1299 (Kan. 1993) —5:79, 5:88, 5:107

Patton v. McHone, 822 S.W.2d 608 (Tenn. App.1991) — 3:215

Patton v. TIC United Corp., 77 F.3d 1235 (10thCir. 1996) — 12:183, 12:185–92

Payne v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 60 P.3d469 (Mont. 2002) — 7:180

Payne v. Soft Sheen Products, Inc., 486 A.2d712 (D.C. App. 1985) — 11:227

Payton v. Abbott Labs, 437 N.E.2d 171 (Mass.1982) — 7:114–16, 7:122, 10:330

Payton v. Abbott Labs, 512 F.Supp. 1031(D.Mass. 1981) — 10:227–28

Pearsall v. Emhart Industries, Inc., 599 F.Supp.207 (E.D.Pa. 1984) — 7:149–50

Pearson v. Franklin Laboratories, Inc., 254N.W.2d 133 (S.D. 1977) — 8:17

Peaster v. David New Drilling Co., 642 So.2d344 (Miss. 1994) — 5:275

Peerless Wall and Window Coverings, Inc., v.Synchronics, 85 F.Supp.2d 519 (W.D.Pa2000) — 4:437

Pena v. Chateau Woodmere Corp., 759 N.Y.S.2d451 (App. Div. 2003) — 9:131

Penasquitos, Inc. v. Superior Court,282 Cal. Rptr. 135 (Cal. 1991) —10:251

Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corp. v. CaterpillarTractor Co., 652 F.2d 1165 (3d Cir.1981) — 7:217

People Exp. Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated RailCorp., 495 A.2d 107 (N.J. 1985) —7:205–07

TABLE OF CASES liii

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page liii

Page 54: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Pepper v. Star Equipment, Ltd., 484 N.W.2d156 (Iowa 1992) — 12:86, 12:100

Perez v. McConkey, 872 S.W.2d 897 (Tenn.1994) — 8:132

Perez v. Wyeth Laboratories Inc., 734 A.2d 1245(N.J. 1999) — 11:86, 11:97–100, 11:118

Perfection Paint & Color Co. v. Konduris, 258N.E.2d 681 (Ind. App. 1970) — 8:208

Perkins v. Dean Machinery Co., 2004 WL912598 (Mo. App. 2004) — 7:307

Perkins v. Northeastern Log Homes, 808S.W.2d 809 (Ky. 1991) — 12:278

Perlmutter v. Beth David Hospital, 123 N.E.2d792 (N.Y. 1954) — 4:62

Permutter v. U.S. Gypsum Co., 54 F.3d 659(10th Cir. 1995) — 5:89

Perry v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 887 F.2d 624 (5thCir. 1989) — 9:44

Perry v. S.N. and S.N., 973 S.W.2d 301 (Tex.1998) — 1:75

Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co., v. Iowa Southern Utili-ties Co., 355 F.Supp. 376 (S.D.Iowa1973) — 2:205

Peters v. Judd Drugs, Inc., 602 N.E.2d 162 (Ind.App. 1992) — 11:123

Peters v. Saft, 597 A.2d 50 (Me. 1991) — 12:217,12:238–39, 12:305

Peterson v. Superior Court, 899 P.2d 905 (Cal.1995) — 4:400–01

Petito v. A.H. Robins Co., Inc., 750 So.2d 103(Fla. App. 1999) — 7:135

Petrocco v. AT & T Teletype, Inc., 642 A.2d1072 (N.J. Super. L. 1994) — 5:298, 5:299

Pettella v. Corp Bros., Inc., 268 A.2d 699 (R.I.1970) — 3:118

Pfizer, Inc. v. Farsian, 682 So.2d 405(Ala.1996) — 7:108

Phelps v. Phelps, 446 S.E.2d 17 (N.C. 1994) —12:171

Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products LiabilityLitigation, In re, 289 F.Supp. 2d 1230(W.D.Wash. 2003) — 10:465

Philips Bros. Elec. Contractors, Inc. v. SolomonCorp., 1997 WL 805271 (E.D.Pa. 1997) —7:10

Phillips v. Cricket Lighters, 841 A.2d 1000 (Pa.2003) — 4:98, 4:309, 4:312–14, 4:316, 5:26

Phillips v. Kimwood Mach. Co., 525 P.2d 1033(Or. 1974) — 4:196–97, 4:282–83, 10:53

Phillips v. Mirac, Inc., 2004 WL 1490450(Mich. 2004) — 12:217, 12:305

Phillips v. Town of Springfield, 540 N.E.2d1331 (Mass. 1989) — 11:8

Phipps v. General Motors Corp., 363 A.2d 955(Md. 1976) — 1:1

Piatt v. Welsh, 974 S.W.2d 786 (Tex. App.1998) — 1:122

Pierce v. Hobart Corp., 512 N.E.2d 14 (Ill. App.1987) — 5:29

Pierre v. Eastern Air Lines, 152 F.Supp. 486(D.N.J. 1957) — 12:165

Pike v. Stephens Imports, Inc., 448 So.2d 738(La. App. 1984) — 7:168

Pillars v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 78 So. 365(Miss. 1918) — 10:116–17, 10–134

d’Hedouville v. Pioneer Hotel Co., 552 F.2d 886(9th Cir. 1977) — 6:104

Piper v. Bear Medical Systems, Inc., 883 P.2d407 (Ariz. App. 1993) — 5:119

Pitt-Des Moines, Inc., United States v., 970F.Supp. 1359 (N.D.Ill. 1997) — 1025

Pittsburg Coca-Cola Bottling Works of Pitts-burg v. Ponder, 443 S.W.2d 546 (Tex.1969) — 10:119–20, 10:129–30

Plaissance v. McDonald, 865 So.2d 1004 (La.App. 2004) — 8:180

Pleasant v. Johnson, 325 S.E.2d 244 (N.C.1985) — 5:271

Pledge v. R.M. Holdings, Inc., 75 P.3d 1126(Colo. App. 2002) — 12:87

Plummer v. McHale, 179 N.Y.S.2d 759 (N.Y.Sup. Ct. 1958) — 6:86

Pokara v. Wabash Ry. Co., 292 U.S. 98 (1934) —5:34–35

Polaris Industries, Inc. v. McDonald, 119S.W.3d 331 (Tex. App. 2003) — 3:136

Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy &Co., Ltd., In re An Arbitration between,[1921] 3 K.B. 560 (C.A.) — 6:41–43

Poliseno v. General Motors Corp., 744 A.2d 679(N.J. Super. App. Div. 2000) — 10:358,10:366

Polk v. Blanque, 633 So.2d 1382 (La. App.1994) — 10:136

Popal v. United States, 1996 WL 185731(S.D.N.Y. 1996) — 5:440

Poplar v. Bourjois, 80 N.E.2d 334 (N.Y.1948) — 6:153

Portage Markets Co. v. George, 146 N.E. 283(Ohio 1924) — 1:106

Porteous v. St. Ann’s Cafe & Deli, 713 So.2d 454(La. 1998) — 11:14–16

Porter v. Rosenberg, 650 So.2d 79 (Fla. App.1995) — 4:69

Post v. American Cleaning Equipment Corp.,437 S.W.2d 516 (Ky. 1969) — 4:378

liv TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page liv

Page 55: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Potomac Edison Co. v. Johnson, 152 A. 633(Md. 1930) — 10:108

Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co., 694 A.2d1319 (Conn. 1997) — 4:207, 4:211, 4:214,4:294–95, 10:407

Potter v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co., 25 Cal.Rptr.2d 550 (Cal. 1993) — 7:103, 7:107,7:117–22

Powder Horn Nursery, Inc. v. Soil and PlantLaboratory, Inc., 579 P.2d 582 (Ariz. App.1978) — 2:203

Powell v. E.W. Bliss Co., 346 F.Supp. 819 (D.C.Mich. 1972) — 1:26

Prairie Productions, Inc. v. Agchem Division-Pennwalt Corp., 514 N.E.2d 1299 (Ind.App. 1987) — 3:20

Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc. v. Sheehan, 852P.2d 1173 (Alaska 1993) — 7:220

Prendergast v. Nelson, 256 N.W.2d 657 (Neb.1977) — 12:331–32

Prentis v. Yale Mfg. Co., 365 N.W.2d 176 (Mich.1984) — 4:259

Presbrey v. Gillette Co., 435 N.E.2d 513 (Ill.App. 1982) — 5:253

Presto v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp., 487S.E.2d 70 (Ga. App. 1997) — 11:161–63,11:203

Preston v. Keith, 584 A.2d 439 (Conn. 1991) —8:179–80, 8:181–82

Price v. Ashby’s Inc., 354 P.2d 1064 (Utah1960) — 10:422–23

Price v. Shell Oil Company, 466 P.2d 722 (Cal.1970) — 4:34

Prince v. LeVan, 486 P.2d 959 (Alaska 1971) —3:188

Proctor v. Davis, 682 N.E.2d 1203 (Ill. App.1997) — 11:104–11

Promaulayko v. Johns Manville Sales Corp., 562A.2d 202 (N.J. 1989) — 9:74–75

Propulsid Products Liability Litigation, In re,2002 WL 1446714 (E.D.La. 2002) —11:207–10

Providence Hospital v. Truly, 611 S.W.2d 127(Tex. Civ. App. 1980) — 4:69, 11:132,11:164–65

Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc., 476 So.2d 657 (Fla.1985) — 12:275

Purjet v. Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp., 1986WL 1200 (D.V.I. 1996) — 7:138

Purvis v. PPG Industries, Inc., 502 So.2d 714(Ala. 1987) — 4:346, 11:225

Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp., 35S.W.3d 643 (Tex. 2000) — 12:53–58, 12:59

Pysz v. Henry’s Drug Store, 457 So.2d 561 (Fla.App. 1984) — 11:191

Quaker Alloy Casting Co. v. Gulfco Industries,Inc., 686 F.Supp. 1319 (N.D.Ill. 1988) —3:248

Quintana v. United Blood Services, A Div. ofBlood Systems, Inc., 811 P.2d 424 (Colo.App. 1991) — 10:35

Quintana-Ruiz v. Hyundai Motor Corp., 303F.3d 62 (1st Cir. 2000) — 4:156, 10:446

R.A.P. v. B.J.P., 428 N.W.2d 103 (Minn. App.1988) — 2:134

R.J. v. Humana of Florida, Inc., 652 So.2d 360(Fla. 1995) — 7:89

Rader v. United States Rubber Reclaiming Co.,617 F.Supp. 1045 (S.D.Miss. 1985) — 5:299

Raflo v. United States, 157 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C.2001) — 5:419

Rahmig v. Mosley Machinery Co., 412 N.W.2d56 (Neb. 1987) — 4:173

Ralston v. Illinois Power Co., 299 N.E.2d 497(Ill. App. 1973) — 8:62

Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc., 431 A.2d811 (N.J. 1981) — 10:267

Ramirez v. Plough, Inc., 863 P.2d 167 (Cal.1993) — 4:361

Ramirez v. Richardon-Merrell, Inc., 628 F.Supp.85 (E.D.Pa. 1986) — 11:191

Ramos Santiago v. Wellcraft Marine Corp., 93F.Supp. 2d 112 (D.PuertoRico 2000) —7:79

Ramos v. Browning Ferris Industries of SouthJersey, Inc., 510 A.2d 1152 (N.J. 1986) —9:128

Ramos v. Silent Hoist and Crane Co., 607 A.2d667 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 1992) — 4:410

Ramsey Brick Sales Co. v. Outlaw, 262 S.E.2d227 (Ga. App. 1979) — 3:164–65

Randi W. v. Muroc Joint Unified School Dist.,929 P.2d 582 (Cal. 1997) — 2:177–78,2:213

Rastelli v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 582N.Y.S.2d 373 (N.Y. 1992) — 5:218–19

Rawson v. Conover, 20 P.3d 876 (Utah 2001) —3:198–201

Ray v. Alad Corp., 136 Cal. Rptr. 574 (Cal.1977) — 10:263–66

Ray v. Upjohn Co., 851 S.W.2d 646 (Mo. App.1993) — 5:247

Raymond v. City of Haverhill, 47 N.E. 101(Mass. 1897) — 6:40

Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co., 371 A.2d 170 (N.H.1977) — 12:62

TABLE OF CASES lv

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lv

Page 56: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Raynor v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 643 F.Supp.238 (D.D.C. 1986) — 11:142

Rayonier Inc. v. United States, 352 U.S. 315(1957) — 5:451

Raytheon Co. v. McGraw-Edison Co., Inc., 979F.Supp. 858 (E.D.Wis. 1997) — 7:266

Reali v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., 106F.Supp.2d 75 (D.Me. 2000) — 4:170

Reaves v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 765F.Supp. 1287 (E.D.Mich.1991) — 11:93

Recreatives, Inc. v. Myers, 226 N.W.2d 474(Wis. 1975) — 3:193

Reed Paper Co. v. Procter & Gamble Distrib.Co., 807 F.Supp. 840 (D.Me. 1992) — 2:59

Reed v. Chrysler Corp., 494 N.W.2d 224 (Iowa1992) — 8:154

Reed v. Danville Concrete Products Co., 429N.E.2d 605 (Ill. App. 1981) — 6:86

Reese v. Good Samaritan Hospital, 953 P.2d 117(Wash. App. 1998) — 3:80–2

Reeves v. Cincinnati, Inc., 439 N.W.2d 326(Mich. App. 1989) — 4:170

Regan v. Amerimark Bldg. Products, Inc., 454S.E.2d 849 (N.C. App. 1995) — 5:268

RegO, In re, 623 A.2d 92 (Del. Ch. 1992) —10:252

Rehurek v. Chrysler Credit Corp., 262 So.2d452 (Fla. App. 1972) — 3:210

Reid v. Eckerds Drugs, Inc., 253 S.E.2d 344(N.C. App. 1979) — 3:159

Reighley v. International Playtex, Inc., 604F.Supp. 1078 (D.Colo. 1985) — 7:186

Reimer v. City of Crookston, 326 F.3d 957 (8thCir. 2003) — 8:44–46

Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292 (1993)—12:167–68Renslow v. Mennonite Hospital, 367 N.E.2d

1250 (Ill. 1977) — 5:61Resolution Trust Corp. v Heiserman, 898 P.2d

1049 (Colo. 1995) — 10:194, 10:209Resolution Trust Corp. v. Block, 924 S.W.2d

354 (Tenn. 1996) — 10:209Reuben v. Ely, 705 P.2d 1360 (Ariz. App.

1985) — 7:186Rexrode v. American Laundry Press Co., 674

F.2d 826 (10th Cir. 1982) — 10:43, 10:Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 (5th

Cir. 1974) — 11:84–85, 11:89–90Rezulin Products Liability Litigation, In re, 133

F.Supp.2d 272 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) — 11:198Rezulin Products Liability Litigation, In re, 309

F.Supp.2d 531 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) — 10:21Rhoads v. Service Mach. Co., 329 F.Supp. 367

(E.D.Ark. 1971) — 8:42–43

Rhoto v. Ribando, 504 So.2d 1119 (La.App.1987) — 11:93

Rhyme v. K-Mart Corp., 594 S.E.2d 1 (N.C.2004) — 12:305

Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 218(1947) — 5:305, 5:307

Rich Products Corp. v. Kemutec, Inc., 66F.Supp.2d 937 (E.D.Wis. 1999) — 7:265

Rich v. Tench Elec. Motor Works, Inc., 642So.2d 293 (La. App. 1994) — 6:6–7, 6:11

Richards v. Goerg Boat and Motors, Inc., 384N.E.2d 1084 (Ind. App. 1979) — 3:215

Richards v. United States, 369 U.S. 1 (1962) —5:419

Richardson v. Carnegie Library Restaurant,Inc., 763 P.2d 1153 (N.M. 1988) — 12:222

Richelman v. Kewanee Machinery & ConveyorCo., 375 N.E.2d 885 (Ill. App. 1978) —5:28–29

Richman v. Charter Arms, 571 F.Supp. 192(E.D.La. 1983) — 11:229

Richman v. United States, 709 F.2d 122 (1st Cir.1983) — 5:424

Riden v. ICI Americas, Inc., 763 F.Supp. 1500(W.D.Mo. 1991) — 5:314

Ridings v. Ralph M. Parsons Co., 914 S.W.2d 79(Tenn. 1996) — 12:94–95

Riff v. Morgan Pharmacy, 508 A.2d 1247 (Pa.Super. 1986) — 11:188

Riley v. American Honda Motor Co., 856 P.2d196 (Mont. 1993) — 3:270–71, 10:166

Riley v. Ford Motor Co., 442 F.2d 670 (5th Cir.1971) — 3:270–71

Rinaldi v. Aaron, 314 So.2d 762 (Fla. 1975) —7:310

Rindlisbaker v. Wilson, 519 P.2d 421 (Idaho1974) — 7:19–20

Rinke v. Potrzebowski, 657 N.W.2d 169 (Mich.App. 2002) — 12:103–06

Rios v. Niagara Mach. & Tool Works, 299N.E.2d 86 (Ill. App. 1973) — 4:242

Rivera v. Wyeth-Ayerst Lab., 283 F.3d 315 (5thCir.2002) — 7:108

Rix v. Reeves, 532 P.2d 185 (Ariz. App. 1975) —4:442

Robb v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 210 A.2d 709(Del. 1965) — 7:92

Robbins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 275U.S. 303 (1927) — 7:202–03

Robbins v. Alberto-Culver Co., 499 P.2d 1080(Kan. 1972) — 5:255

Roberson v. Nooter Corp. 459 So.2d 1156 (Fla.App. 1984) — 5:299

lvi TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lvi

Page 57: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Roberts v. Gray’s Crane & Rigging, Inc., 697P.2d 985 (Or. App. 1985) — 9:128, 9:131

Roberts v. Rich Foods, Inc., 654 A.2d 1365 (N.J.1995) — 4:211

Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc., 914 F.2d 360(3rd Cir. 1990) — 10:333

Robinson v. Audi Nsu Auto Union Aktienge-sellschaft, 739 F.2d 1481 (10th Cir.1984) — 10:45

Robinson v. Charleston Area Medical Center, 414S.E.2d 877 (W.Va. 1991)—12:216, 12:305

Robinson v. Lewis, 457 P.2d 483 (Or. 1969) —8:197

Robinson v. Omer, 952 S.W.2d 423 (Tenn.1997) — 2:194–95

Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Div. of Package Ma-chinery Co., 426 N.Y.S.2d 717 (N.Y.1980) — 4:99–101, 4:222, 4:379, 5:235

Robinson v. Williamson, 537 S.E.2d 159 (Ga.App. 2000) — 11:158

Rock Creek Ginger Ale Co. v. Thermice Corp.,352 F.Supp. 522 (D.D.C. 1971) — 3:127

Rocky Mountain Helicopters, Inc. v. Bell Heli-copter, 24 F.3d 125 (10th Cir. 1994) —2:73, 2:79

Rodgers v. American Honda Motor Co., 46 F.3d1 (1st Cir. 1995) — 8:188, 8:190

Rodrigues v. Besser Co., 565 P.2d 1315 (Ariz.App. 1977) — 5:79

Rogers v. Furlow, 699 F.Supp. 672(N.D.Ill.1988) — 10:194

Roginski v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 378 F.2d832 (2nd Cir. 1967) — 7:316–17

Romero v. International Harvester Co., 979 F.2d1444 (10th Cir. 1992) — 5:106

Romito v. Red Plastic Co., 44 Cal. Rptr. 2d 834(Cal. App. 1995) — 6:29–31

Rookes v. Bernard, [1964] App. Case. 1129; 1All E.R. 367 — 1:69, 7:294–95

Rosales v. Verson Allsteel Press Co., 354 N.E.2d553 (Ill. App. 1976) — 5:299

Rosario v. American Export-Isbrandtsen Lines,Inc., 531 F.2d 1227 (3rd Cir. 1976) — 5:424

Rose v. Via Christi Health System, Inc., 78 P.3d798 (Kan. 2003) — 12:128, 12:129

Rosebrock v General Electric Co., 140 N.E. 571(N.Y. 1923) — 5:146

Rosemond v. Harshaw Chemical Co., 521N.Y.S.2d 754 (App. Div. 1987) — 5:156

Rosenan v. City of Esterville, 199 N.W.2d 125(Iowa 1972) — 8:132

Rosenblum v. Adler, 461 A.2d 138 (N.J.1983) — 2:185

Ross v. First Family Financial Services, Inc.,2002 WL 31059582 (N.D.Miss. 2002) —7:307

Ross v. Philip Morris & Co., 328 F.2d 3 (8th Cir.1964) — 1:26

Ross v. Spiegel, Inc., 373 N.E.2d 1288 (Ohio1977) — 9:20–22

Ross v. Up-Right, Inc., 402 F.2d 943 (5th Cir.1968) — 4:74

Rossell v. Volkswagen of America, 709 P.2d 517(Ariz. 1985) — 10:36

Rossell v. Volkswagen of America, 709 P.2d 533(Ariz. App. 1984) — 1:11

Rotorex Co., Inc. v. Kingbury Corp., 42F.Supp.2d 563 (D.Md. 1999) — 7:5

Roundhouse v. Owen-Illinois, Inc., 604 F.2d990 (6th Cir. 1979) — 7:30

Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. LorraineCorp., 633 F.2d 34 (7th Cir. 1980) — 3:106

Russek v. Unisys Corp., 921 F.Supp. 1277(D.N.J. 1996) — 5:499

Russo v. Abex Corp., 670 F.Supp. 206(E.D.Mich. 1987) — 1:40

Ruzzo v. LaRose Enterprises, 748 A.2d 261 (R.I.2000) — 8:17, 8:34

Ryan v. Eli Lilly & Co., 514 F.Supp. 1004(D.S.C. 1981) — 10:305–06

Rybeck v. Rybeck, 358 A.2d 828 (N.J. Super. L.1976) — 12:226

Rylands v. Fletcher, (1965) 3 Hurl. & C. 774(Ex. Ct.) — 4:1

Rylands v. Fletcher, (1865–66) L.R. 1 Ex 265;[1865–66] All E.R. Rep. 1; (1866) Hurl. &C. 263 (Ex Chamber) — 4:1–4

Rylands v. Fletcher, (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 330—4:5Safeway Stores v. Nest-Kart, 579 P.2d 441 (Cal.

1978) — 4:40Salcetti v. Truck, 27 UCCRS 679 (D.C.Super.

1979) — 8:31Salinas v. Vierstra, 695 P.2d 369 (Idaho 1985) —

8:132Salisbury v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., 166 F.Supp.2d

546 (E.D.Ky. 2001) — 11:198Salk v. Alpine Ski Shop, Inc., 342 A.2d 622 (R.I.

1975) — 3:49–52Saloomy v. Jeppeson & Co., 707 F.2d 671 (2d

Cir. 1983) — 4:430Salter v. United States, 880 F.Supp. 1524

(M.D.Ala. 1995) — 5:438Salvador v. Atlantic Steel Boiler Co., 319 A.2d

903 (Pa. 1974) — 3:25–27Sampson v. Penny, 187 N.W. 135 (Minn.

1922) — 2:139

TABLE OF CASES lvii

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lvii

Page 58: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc., 789P.2d 541 (Kan. 1990) — 12:258–59

Samson v. Reising, 215 N.W.2d 662 (Wis.1974) — 3:134, 10:275–76

San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon,359 U.S. 236 (1959) — 5:317

Sanchez v. Schindler, 651 S.W.2d 249 (Tex.1983) — 7:177–78

Sanchez-Lopez v. Fedco Food Corp., 211N.Y.S.2d 953 (N.Y. City Ct. 1961) — 3:119

Sanderson v. Eckerd Corp., 780 So.2d 930 (Fla.App. 2001) — 11:189

Sands v. J.I. Case Co., 605 N.E.2d 714 (Ill. App.1992) — 9:118–19

Santor v. A & M Karagheusian, Inc., 207 A.2d305 (N.J. 1965) — 7:211–12

Sapp v. Morton Bldgs., Inc., 973 F.2d 539 (7thCir. 1992) — 4:63–64

Saratoga Fish Co. v. J. M. Martinac & Co., 520U.S. 875 (1997) — 7:228–29

Sargent Fletcher, Inc. v. Able Corp., 3 Cal. Rptr.3d 279 (Cal. App. 2003) — 10:14

Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp., 321 U.S.620 (1944) — 10:446

Sauder Custom Fabrication, Inc. v. Boyd, 967S.W.2d 349 (Tex. 1998) — 5:199

Saunder v. Cowl, 277 N.W. 12 (Minn. 1938) —3:102

Saunders System Birmingham Co. v. Adams,117 So. 72 (Ala. 1928) — 6:20

Savard v. Cody Chevrolet, Inc., 234 A.2d 656(Vt. 1967) — 7:92

Saxby v. Southern Land Co., 63 S.E. 423(1909) — 2:26

Scallan v. Duriron Co., 11 F.3d 1249 (5th Cir.1994) — 4:234

Schaefer v. Edward D. Jones & Co., 552 N.W.2d801 (S.D. 1996) — 7:302

Schaerrer v. Stewart’s Plaza Pharmacy, Inc., 79P.3d 922 (Utah 2003) — 11:149–52

Schafer v. JLC Food Services, Inc., 2004 WL78022 (Minn. App. 2004) — 11:26

Schaffner v. Chicago and North WesternTransp. Co., 515 N.E.2d 298 (Ill. App.1987) 4:173

Schenebeck v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 423 F.2d 919(8th Cir. 1970) — 10:149

Schmaltz v. Nissen, 431 N.W.2d 657 (S.D.1988) — 3:236

Schmidt v. Mahoney, 659 N.W.2d 552 (Iowa2003) — 2:172

Schmidt v. United States, 933 F.2d 639 (8th Cir.1991) — 5:424

Schmitt v. Ornes Esswein & Co., 183 N.W. 840(Minn. 1921) — 2:99–101

Schneider National, Inc. v. Holland Hitch Co.,843 P.2d 561 (Wyo. 1992) — 4:222, 9:75

Scholz v. Metropolitan Pathologists, PC, 851P.2d 901 (Colo. 1993) — 12:305

Schump v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co., 541N.E.2d 1040 (Ohio 1989) — 5:295–97

Schutte v. Celotex Corp., 492 N.W.2d 773(Mich. App. 1992) — 10:146

Schwan v. Riverside Methodist Hosp., 452N.E.2d 1337 (Ohio 1983) — 12:304

Schweber Electronic v. National SemiconductorCorp., 850 P.2d 119 (Ariz. App. 1992) —9:32, 9:47

Schweiger Const. Co., Inc. v. United States, 49Fed. Cl. 188 (Fed. Cl. 2001) — 5:435

Scott v. Forest Lake Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge,598 N.W.2d 713 (Minn. App. 2000) —2:112

Scott v. Greenville Pharmacy, 44 S.E.2d 324(S.C. 1948) — 6:167

Scott v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc., 550 N.W.2d809 (Mich. App. 1996) — 3:43–44

Scott v. Norman, 391 S.W.2d 890 (Mo. 1965) —8:60

Scott v. Pacific West Mountain Resort, 834 P.2d6 (Wash. 1992) — 8:7

Scovil v. Chilcoat, 424 P.2d 87 (Okla. 1967) —3:116–17

Seagraves v. ABCO Manufacturing Co., 164S.E.2d 242 (Ga.App. 1968) — 2:228–29

Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United States, 689F.Supp. 450 (D.N.J. 1988) — 9:11, 9:13

Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United States, 874 F.2d169 (3rd Cir. 1989) — 9:14–15

Seattle-First Nat. Bank v. Shoreline ConcreteCo., 588 P.2d 1308 (Wash. 1978) — 12:79

Sebago, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc., 18 F.Supp.2d70 (D.Mass 1998) — 2:50, 2:59, 3:18, 3:21,7:263

Sedar v. Knowlton Const. Co., 551 N.E.2d 938(Ohio 1990) — 12:237

Sedgwick v. Kawasaki Cycleworks, Inc., 593N.E.2d 69 (Ohio App. 1991) — 10:135

Seely v. White Motor Co., 403 P.2d 145 (Cal.1965) — 7:213–14

Seese v. Volkswagenwerk A.G., 648 F.2d 833(3rd Cir. 1981) — 10:413–14

Selchert v. State, 420 N.W.2d 816 (Iowa1988) — 12:114

Select Pork, Inc. v. Babcock Swine, Inc., 640F.2d 147 (8th Cir. 1981) — 3:269

lviii TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lviii

Page 59: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Seley v. G.D. Searle & Co., 423 N.E.2d 831(Ohio 1981) — 11:93

Selfe v. Smith, 397 So.2d 348 (Fla. App.1981) — 7:140

Selman v. Shirley, 91 P.2d 312 (Or. 1939) —2:125

Semeniuk v. Chentis, 117 N.E.2d 883 (Ill. App.1954) — 1:12

Senn v. Merrill-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 751P.2d 215 (Or. 1988) — 11:52

Seoane v. Ortho Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 660 F.2d146 (5th Cir. 1981) — 12:194

Sexton v. Bell Helmets, Inc., 926 F.2d 331 (4thCir. 1991) — 10:57, 10:397

Shackil v. Lederle Laboratories, a Div. of Amer-ican Cyanamid Co., 561 A.2d 511 (N.J.1989) — 10:330

Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc., 249 N.W.2d 251(S.D. 1976) — 10:98

Shanks v. Upjohn Co., 835 P.2d 1189 (Alaska1992) — 11:52

Shanley v. Callanan Industries, Inc., 429 N.E.2d104 (N.Y. 1981) — 12:113

Sharkey v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 600 So.2d 701(La. App. 1992) — 7:69, 11:127

Sharp ex rel. Gordon v. Case Corp., 595 N.W.2d380 (Wis. 1999) — 5:88

Sharpe v. Bestop, Inc., 713 A.2d 1079 (N.J.Super. App. Div. 1998) — 10:154

Shaw v. Dow Brands, Inc., 994 F.2d 364 (7thCir. 1993) — 5:352

Shaw v. Grumman Aerospace Corp., 778 F.2d736 (11th Cir. 1985) — 5:477

Shawver v. Roberts Corp., 280 N.W.2d 226(Wis. 1979) — 4:222

Shea v. North Butte Mining Co., 179 P. 499(Mont. 1919) — 12:224

Sheehan v. Cincinnati Shaper Co., 555 A.2d1352 (Pa. Super. 1989) — 4:222

Sheeskin v. Giant Food Inc., 318 A.2d 874 (Md.App. 1974) — 3:168

Shell Oil Co. v. Gutierrez, 581 P.2d 271 (Ariz.App. 1978) — 4:353

Shepard v. Superior Court, 142 Cal. Rptr. 612(Cal. App. 1977) — 7:79, 7:158, 7:160

Shepherd Components, Inc., v. Brice Petrides-Donohue & Assoc., Inc., 473 N.W.2d 612(Iowa 1991) — 12:28

Shield v. Bayliner Marine Corp., 822 F.Supp. 81(D.Conn. 1993) — 7:173

Shiflet v. Eller, 319 S.E.2d 750 (Va. 1984) — 9:6Shipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc., 207 A.2d 314

(N.J. 1965) — 4:392

Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co., 568 A.2d1196 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 1989) — 10:333

Short v. Edison Chouest Offshore, Inc., 638So.2d 790 (Ala. 1994) — 5:253

Shorter v. Drury, 695 P.2d 116 (Wash. 1985) —8:14

Siemen v. Alden, 341 N.E.2d 713 (Ill. App.1975) — 3:131–33

Sills v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc. 296 F. Supp. 776(N.D.Ind. 1969) — 1:40

Silver v. Silver, 280 U.S. 117 (1927) — 12:262Simitar Entertainment, Inc., In re, 275 B.R. 331

(D.Minn. Bankruptcy Ct. 2002) — 2:163,3:185

Simmons v. Pacor, Inc., 674 A.2d 232 (Pa.1996) — 7:126

Simon II Litigation, In re, 211 F.R.D. 86(E.D.N.Y. 2002) — 10:438

Simon Property Group, L.P. v. mySimon, Inc.,2000 WL 1206575 (S.D.Ind. 2000) — 2:98

Simon v. Beebe Medical Center, 2004 WL692647 (Del. Super. 2004) — 7:302

Simoneau v. South Bend Lathe, Inc., 543 A.2d407 (N.H. 1988) — 10:262

Simpson v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 901 F.2d277 (2nd Cir. 1990) — 7:302

Sims v. Tezak, 694 N.E.2d 1015 (Ill. App.1998) — 2:104

Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, 607 P.2d 924(Cal. 1980) — 10:228, 10:291, 10:307,10:308–15

Sinn v. Bird, 404 A.2d 672 (Pa. 1979) — 7:81Sithon Maritime Co. v. Holiday Mansion, 983

F.Supp. 977 (D.Kan. 1997) — 3:18Skees v. United States, 107 F.3d 411 (6th Cir.

1997) — 5:460Skelton v. Druid City Hosp. Bd., 459 So.2d 818

(Ala. 1984) — 11:158Skipworth by Williams v. Lead Industries Ass’n,

Inc., 690 A.2d 169 (1997) — 10:208Slack v. James, 589 S.E.2d 772 (S.C. App.

2003) — 2:108Slater v. Skyhawk Transp., Inc., 77 F.Supp.2d

580 (D.N.J. 1999) — 9:131Slattery v. Marra Bros., Inc., 186 F.2d 134 (2nd

Cir. 1951) — 9:59Slaughter v. Pennsylvania X-Ray Corp., 638

F.2d 639 (3rd Cir. 1981) — 9:6Slover v. Fabtek, 517 A.2d 293 (Del. Super.

1986) — 10:20SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett,

Stainback & Associates, Inc., 28 P.3d 669(Utah 2001) — 3:63

TABLE OF CASES lix

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lix

Page 60: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Smith v. Aaron, 508 S.W.2d 320 (Ark. 1974) —1:113

Smith v. Air Feeds, Inc., 556 N.W.2d 160 (IowaCt. App. 1996) — 5:270

Smith v. Department of Insurance, 507 So.2d1080 (Fla. 1987) — 12:229–30

Smith v. Leach Brain & Co., [1962] 2 Q.B. 405—6:155–57

Smith v. Linn, 563 A.2d 123 (Pa. Super.1989) — 4:432–33

Smith v. Old Warson Dev. Co., 479 S.W.2d 795(Mo. 1972) — 4:394

Smith v. Selco Products, 385 S.E.2d 173 (N.C.App. 1989) — 5:79

Smith v. Sharpensteen, 521 P.2d 394 (Okla.1974) — 3:211

Smith v. Snead, 938 S.W.2d 181 (Tex. App.1997) — 2:207–09

Smith v. Stewart, 667 P.2d 358 (Kan. 1983) —3:124, 3:194, 3:248

Smith v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co., 278F.Supp.2d 684 (W.D.N.C. 2003) — 10:465

Smith v. Xerox Corp., 866 F.2d 135 (5th Cir.1989) — 5:501–02

Snell v. Bell Helicopter, 107 F.3d 744 (9th Cir.1997) — 5:499

Snider v. Bob Thibodeau Ford, Inc., 202 N.W.2d727 (Mich. App. 1972)—10:284–86

Snowden v. Canaught Laboratories, Inc., 136F.R.D. 694 (D.Kan. 1991) — 4:152

Snyder v. ISC Alloys, Ltd., 772 F. Supp. 244(W.D.Pa. 1991) — 4:58

Snyder v. LTG Luftechnische GmbH, 955S.W.2d 252 (Tenn. 1997) — 12:96

Soaper v. Hope Indus., Inc., 424 S.E.2d 493(S.C. 1992) — 3:192

Soaper v. Hope Indus., Inc., 413 S.E.2d 38(S.C.App. 1992) — 10:7

Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp., 771 P.2d 711 (Wash.1989) — 12:202, 12:337, 12:344–45

Solo v. Trus Joint MacMillan, 2004 WL 524898(D.Minn. 2004) — 10:74

Sonbergh v. MacQuarrie, 247 P.2d 133 (Cal.App. 1952) — 12:49

Sonnenreich v. Philip Morris, Inc., 929 F.Supp.416 (S.D.Fla.1996) — 10:194

Soo Line Railroad Co. v. Fruehauf Corp., 547F.2d 1365 (8th Cir. 1977) — 3:274–75

Sorban v. Sterling Engineering Corp., 830A.2d 372 (Conn. App. 2003) —5:275

Sorrells v. Eli Lilly & Co., 737 F.Supp. 678(D.D.C. 1990) — 5:75

Soule v. General Motors Corp., 882 P.2d 298(Cal. 1994) — 4:272–74, 5:161, 10:400–02

Southeastern Steel Company v. W.A. HuntConstruction Company, Inc., 390 S.E.2d475 (S.C. App. 1990) — 3:249–50

Southern Bakeries, Inc. v. Knipp, 852 So.2d 712(Ala. 2002) — 7:138

Sparapany v. Rexall Corp., 618 N.E.2d 1098 (Ill.App. 1993) — 5:75

Sparks v. Kroger Co., 407 S.E.2d 105 (Ga. App.1991) — 11:172–74

Speed Fasteners v. Newson, 382 F.2d 395 (10thCir. 1967) — 3:28

Spencer v. Ford Motor Co., 367 N.W.2d 393(Mich. App. 1985) — 5:221–22

Sperry-New Holland, A Div. of Sperry Corp. v.Prestage, 617 So.2d 248 (Miss. 1993) —4:146, 4:157

Spiegel v. Saks 34th Street, 252 N.Y.S.2d 852(N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1964) — 3:59

Spier v. Barker, 363 N.Y.S.2d 916 (N.Y. 1974) —8:187, 8:190, 8:193, 8:197

Spiller v. Thomas M. Lowe, Jr. & Assoc., Inc.,466 F.2d 903 (8th Cir.1972) —7:172

Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine, a Div. ofBrunswick Corp., 537 U.S. 51 (2002) —5:393, 5:395, 5:400–12

Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine, a Div. ofBrunswick Corp., 757 N.E.2d 75 (Ill.2001) — 5:406

Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford MotorCo., 489 A.2d 660 (N.J. 1985) — 7:215–16,7:271

Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co., 71 Cal. Rptr.2d190 (Cal. App. 1998) — 6:139

Spruill v. Boyle-Midway, Inc., 308 F.2d 79 (4thCir. 1962) — 4:350–51, 4:362, 4:365

Spychala v. G.D. Searle & Co., 705 F.Supp. 1024(D.N.J.1988) — 11:93

Squire v. Reynolds, 5 A.2d 877 (Conn. 1939) —6:40

Squish La Fish, Inc. v. Thomco Specialty Prod-ucts, Inc., 149 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir.1998) — 2:210–13, 7:254

St. Denis v. Department of Housing and UrbanDevelopment, 900 F.Supp. 1094 (D.Alaska1995) — 7:254

St. Joseph’s Hospital v. Corbetta ConstructionCo., 316 N.E.2d 51 (Ill. App. 1974) —2:5–8, 2:38–39, 2:57

St. Louis S.W.R. Co. v. Williams, 397 F.2d 147(5th Cir. 1968) — 1:108

lx TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lx

Page 61: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Michelin TireCorp., 298 N.E.2d 289 (Ill. App. 1973) —9:103, 9:119

St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. R. V. World,577 N.E.2d 72 (Ohio App. 1989) — 3:63

Stahlheber v. American Cyanamid Co., 451S.W.2d 48 (Mo. 1970) — 1:27

Stanback v. Parke, Davis & Co., 657 F.2d 642(4th Cir. 1981) — 10:141

Standard Brands Chemical Industries, Inc. v.Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc., 319 N.Y.S.2d457 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1971) — 3:168

Standard Fish Co., Ltd. v. 7337 Douglas Enter-prises, Inc., 673 So.2d 503 (Fla. App.1996) — 7:5

Stanfield v. Medalist Indus., Inc., 340 N.E.2d276 (Ill. App. 1975) — 4:217

Stanford v. Owens, 265 S.E.2d 617 (N.C. App.1980) — 2:87

Stang v. Hertz Corp., 490 P.2d 475 (N.M. App.1971) — 3:77–79

Stang v. Hertz Corporation, 497 P.2d 732 (N.M.1972) — 4:34

Stanley Industries, Inc., v. W. M. Barr & Co.,784 F.Supp. 1570 (S.D.Fla. 1992) —4:361

Stanton v. Astra Pharmaceutical Prod. Inc., 718F.2d 553 (3rd Cir. 1983) — 1:81, 1:83,1:111

State Auto Mutual Ins. Co. v. Chrysler Corp.,304 N.E.2d 891 (Ohio 1973) — 10:385

State ex rel. Nichols v. Safeco Ins. Co., 671 P.2d1151 (N.M. App. 1983) — 2:159

State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v.Sheward, 715 N.E.2d 1062 (Ohio 1999) —12:22, 12:40, 12:202, 12:337

State ex rel. Strykowski v. Wilkie, 261 N.W.2d434 (Wis. 1978) — 12:228

State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Anderson-Weber, Inc., 110 N.W.2d 449 (Iowa1961) — 10:118

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Campbell,538 U.S. 408 (2003) — 1:2, 7:285,7:332–44, 12:15, 12:196

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ford MotorCo., 736 So.2d 384 (Miss. App. 1999) —7:222–23

State v. Moseley, 436 S.E.2d 632 (Ga. 1993) —7:309

State v. Purdy, 601 P.2d 258 (Alaska 1979) —5:299

State v. Swapp, 808 P.2d 115 (Utah App.1991) — 6:86

States Steamship Co. v. Stone Manganese Ma-rine, Ltd., 371 F.Supp. 500 (D.N.J.1973) — 4:252, 4:454

Statler v. George A. Ray Mfg. Co., 88 N.E. 1063(N.Y. 1909) 5:129

Stauffer Chemical Co. v. Curry, 778 P.2d 1083(Wyo. 1989) — 3:211

Stauffer v. Ely, 270 N.E.2d 889 (Ind. App.1971) — 6:48

Stebbins v. Concord Wrigley Drugs, Inc., 416N.W.2d 381 (Mich. App. 1987) —11:183–85

Stehlik v. Rhoads, 645 N.W.2d 889 (Wis.2002) — 8:188

Stein v. Lukes, 823 S.W.2d 832 (Ark. 1992) —7:302

Steiner v. Ford Motor Co., 606 N.W.2d 881(N.D. 2000) — 10:7

Stencel Aero Engineering Corp. v. United States,431 U.S. 666 (1977) — 5:459

Stephens v. Chevron Oil Co., 517 F.2d 1123(5th Cir. 1975) — 9:43

Stephenson v. R. A. Jones & Co., 510 A.2d 1161(N.J. 1986) — 9:130

Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Cornish, 370 F.2d 82 (8thCir. 1966) — 11:81

Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical Corp., 855 F.2d1188 (6th Cir. 1988) — 7:103

Sternhagen v. Dow Co., 935 P.2d 1139 (Mont.1997) — 4:15, 4:203, 4:209–10, 4:212,4:297, 4:338

Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co., 107 Cal. Rptr. 45(Cal. 1973) — 11:102–03

Stevenson v. R. A. Jones & Co., Inc., 510 A.2d1161 (N.J. 1986) — 5:79

Stewart v. CMI Corp. 740 P.2d 1340 (Utah1987) — 5:299

Stewart v. General Motors Corp., 222 F.Supp.2d845 (W.D.Ky. 2002) — 4:170

Stewart v. Houk, 271 P. 998 (Or. 1928) —12:277

Stewart v. Scott-Kitz Miller Co., 626 P.2d 329(Okla. App. 1981) — 8:216

Stipp v. Tsutomi Karasawa, 318 S.W.2d 172(Mo. 1958) — 8:184

Stofman v. Keenan Motors, Inc., 63 Pa. D. &C.2d 56 (Pa. Com. Pl. 1973) — 3:143

Stolle v. Anheuser-Busch, 271 S.W. 497 (Mo.1925) — 10:127

Stone v. United Engineering, a Div. of Wean,Inc., 475 S.E.2d 439 (W.Va. 1996) — 10:20

Stonehocker v. General Motors Corp., 587 F.2d151 (4th Cir. 1978) — 10:82, 10:362

TABLE OF CASES lxi

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lxi

Page 62: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Stones v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 558 N.W.2d540 (Neb. 1997) — 3:193

Straub v. Fisher and Paykel Health Care, 990P.2d 384 (Utah 1999) — 7:80

Strong v. E. I. DuPont de Nemours Co., Inc., 667F.2d 682 (8th Cir.1981)—10:389, 10:393

Strzelecki v. Blaser’s Lakeside Industries of RiceLake, Inc., 348 N.W.2d 311 (Mich. App.1984) — 7:50–51

Stultz v. Reese Bros., Inc., 835 A.2d 754 (Pa.Super. 2003) — 8:180

Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp., 639 A.2d507 (Conn. 1994) — 5:261, 5:275

Suchomajcz v. Hummel Chemical Co., Newark,New Jersey, 524 F.2d 19 (3rd Cir. 1975) —1:56

Sullivan Industries, Inc. v. Double Seal GlassCo., Inc., 480 N.W.2d 623 (Mich. App.1991) — 7:237–38

Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275 (1993) —7:301

Summers v. Tice, 199 P.2d 1 (Cal. 1948) —10:287–90, 10:292

Sumner v. General Motors Corp., 538 N.W.2d112 (Mich. App. 1995) — 10:362

Sumnich v. Toyota Motors Sales, 360 N.W.2d 2(Wis. 1984) — 6:11

Sunday v. Stratton Corp., 390 A.2d 398 (Vt.1978) — 8:132

Sundstrom v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 816F.Supp. 587 (N.D.Cal. 1993) — 5:500

Suttie v. Sun Oil Co., 15 Pa. D. & C. 3 (Pa.Cmwlth. Ct. 1930) — 8:145

Swamb v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 516 So.2d 452(La. App. 1987) — 7:75

T.J. Hooper, The, 60 F.2d 737 (2nd Cir.1932) — 10:27

T.J. Stevenson & Co., Inc. v. 81,193 Bags ofFlour, 629 F.2d 338 (5th Cir. 1980) —3:244

Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co., 944 P.2d 1279(Haw. 1997) — 5:102–03

Talley v. Danek Medical, Inc., 197 F.3d 154 (4thCir. 1999) — 1:74

Tamiami Gun Shop v. Klein, 109 So.2d 189(Fla. App. 1959) — 8:91–92

Tamiami Gun Shop v. Klein, 116 So.2d 421(Fla. 1959) — 1:109

Tansy v. Dacomed Corp., 890 P.2d 881 (Okla.1994) — 11:52

Target Stores, Div. of Dayton-Hudson Corp. v.Automated Maintenance Services, Inc.,492 N.W.2d 899 (N.D. 1992) — 10:209

Tasca v. GTE Products, 438 N.W.2d 625 (Mich.App. 1988) — 5:216–17

Tate v. Canonica, 5 Cal. Rptr. 28 (Cal. App.1960) — 6:167

Taurino v. Ellen, 579 A.2d 925 (Pa. Super.1990) — 11:93

Taylor v. Alfama, 481 A.2d 1059 (Vt. 1984) —3:105

Taylor v. Gate Pharmaceuticals, 639 N.W.2d 45(Mich. App. 2001) — 12:29

Teagle v. Fisher & Porter Co., 570 P.2d 438(Wash. 1977) — 8:186, 8:197

Technical Chem. Co. v. Jacobs, 480 S.W.2d 602(Tex. 1972) — 10:158

Teepak, Inc. v. Learned, 699 P.2d 5 (Kan.1985) — 9:1, 9:110

Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp. v. Carter,993 S.W.2d 88 (Tex. 1999) — 7:132–33

Tennessee Carolina Transp., Inc. v. StrickCorp., 196 S.E.2d 711 (N.C. 1973) —3:206–07

Tenold v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 873 P.2d 413 (Or.App. 1994) — 12:212–13

Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc., 216 Cal. Rptr. 130(Cal. 1985) — 7:190

Terhune v. A.H. Robins Co., 577 P.2d 975, 978(Wash. 1978) — 11:93

Testa v. Seidler, 439 N.Y.S.2d 469 (App. Div.1981) — 7:71

Tetuan v. A.H. Robins Co., 738 P.2d 1210 (Kan.1987) — 2:59, 2:129

Texaco, Inc. v. McGrew Lumber Co., 254N.E.2d 584 (Ill. App. 1969) — 9:79

Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.,451 U.S. 630 (1981) — 5:482

Thames v. Zerangue, 411 So.2d 17 (La. 1980) —6:161

Thibert v. Milka, 646 N.E. 1025 (Mass. 1995) —5:60

Thing v. La Chusa, 771 P.2d 814 (Cal. 1989) —7:147–48

Thomas v. Clairol Inc., 583 So.2d 108 (La. App.1991) — 4:361

Thomas v. Winchester, 6 N.Y. 397 (N.Y.1852) — 5:128

Thomasson v. Rich Products Corp., 502 S.E.2d289 (Ga. App. 1998) — 12:127

Thompson v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Prods. Co.,Inc., 832 P.2d 203 (Ariz. 1992) — 7:307

Thompson v. Coates, 694 So.2d 599 (La. App.1997) — 7:24

Thornton v. Mono Manufacturing Co., 425N.E.2d 522 (Ill. App. 1981) — 12:236

lxii TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lxii

Page 63: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Thrash v. U-Drive-It Co., 110 N.E.2d 419(Ohio 1953) — 6:126–28

Thurin v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.,1998 WL 378840 (Wis. App. 1998) — 7:267

Tibbetts v. Crossroads, Inc., 572 N.W.2d 535(Minn. App. 1987) — 7:92

Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc., 661N.W.2d 450 (Wis. App. 2003) — 2:84

Tillett v. J.I. Case Co., 756 F.2d 591 (7th Cir.1985) — 5:477

Tillman v. Vance Equipment Co., 596 P.2d 1299(Or. 1979) — 4:439–40, 4:444

Tillotson-Pearson, Inc., 840 F.Supp. 935 (D.R.I.1994) — 2:112

Timmons v. Ford Motor Co., 982 F.Supp. 1475(S.D.Ga. 1997) — 4:173

Tinnerholm v. Parke, Davis & Co., 411 F.2d 48(2d Cir. 1969) — 11:63

Tirrell v. Navistar International, Inc., 591 A.2d643 (N.J. Super. App. Div. 1991) — 4:222

Title v. Pontchartrain Hotel, 449 So.2d 677 (La.App. 1984) — 11:12, 11:13

Tobin v. Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.,993 F.2d 528 (6th Cir. 1993) — 11:52,11:73

Todd v Societe Bic, S.A., 21 F.3d 1402 (7th Cir.1994) — 4:142, 4:278–80, 4:310, 5:162–63

Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc., 255 N.W.2d362 (Minn. 1977) — 9:61–67

Toledo, Peoria and Western Ry. v. Metro WasteSystems, Inc., 59 F.3d 637 (7th Cir.1975) — 8:170

Toliver v. General Motors Corp., 482 So.2d 213(Miss. 1985) — 4:157, 4:190

Toltec Fabrics, Inc. v. August Inc., 29 F.3d 778(2nd Cir. 1994) — 7:29

Tomczuk v. Town of Cheshire, 217 A.2d 71(Conn. 1965) — 3:242

Tommy’s Elbow Room v. Kavorkian, 727 P.2d1038 (Alaska 1986) — 7:175, 7:178

Toner v. Lederle Laboratories, A Div. of Ameri-can Cyanamid Co., 732 P.2d 297 (Idaho1987) — 11:52, 11:80

Toppi v. United States, 332 F.Supp. 513 (E.D.Pa.1971) — 5:437

Toro v. Krouse, Kern & Co., Inc., 644 F.Supp.986 (N.D.Ind. 1986) — 2:182, 2:184

Torre v. Harris-Seybold Co., 404 N.E.2d 96(Mass. App. 1980) — 10:20

Torres v. El Paso Elec. Co., 987 P.2d 386 (N.M.1999) — 6:94

Torsiello v. Whitehall Labs., 398 A.2d 132 (N.J.Super. App. Div. 1979) — 11:83, 11:123

Town of Bridgeport v. Sterling, Clark, LurtonCorp., 693 A.2d 701 (Vt. 1997) — 4:353

Tozer v. LTV Corp., 792 F.2d 403 (4th Cir.1986) — 5:477, 5:480–81, 5:492

Trans States Airlines v. Pratt & Whitney Canada,Inc., 682 N.E.2d 45 (Ill. 1997)—7:224–28

Transport Ins. Co. v. Chrysler Corp., 71 F.3d720 (8th Cir. 1995) — 9:114

Transue v. Aesthetech Corp., 341 F.3d 911 (9thCir. 2003) — 11:78–80

Trimarco v Klein, 436 N.E.2d 502 (N.Y.1982) — 10:24

Trimble v. Asarco, Inc., 232 F.3d 946 (8th Cir.2000) — 7:52, 7:138

Triplex Communications, Inc. v. Riley, 900S.W.2d 716 (Tex. 1995) — 10:194

Tromza v. Tecumseh Products Co., 378 F.2d 601(3rd Cir. 1967) — 9:56–57

Trovato v. DeVeau, 736 A.2d 1212 (N.H.1999) — 12:291

Trust Corp. of Montana v. Piper Aircraft Corp.,506 F.Supp. 1093 (D.Mont.1981) — 8:153

Tryon v. Square D Co., 712 N.Y.S.2d 676 (App.Div. 2000) — 4:429

Tucci v. Bossert, 385 N.Y.S.2d 328 (App. Div.1976) — 6:55–58

Tucker v. Collar, 285 P.2d 178 (Ariz. 1955) —5:21–22

Tuggle v. Raymond Corp., 868 S.W.2d 621(Tenn. App. 1992) — 1:80

Tulkku v. Machworth Rees, Div. of Avis Indus-tries, Inc., 281 N.W.2d 291 (Mich.1979) — 8:90

Tull v. United States, 481 U.S. 412 (1987) —12:154–56

Tunkl v. Regents of University of California, 32Cal. Rptr. 33 (Cal. 1962) — 8:13

Turcotte v. Fell, 474 N.Y.S.2d 893 (N.Y.Sup.1984) — 8:137

Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co., 244 N.W.2d873 (Mich. 1976) — 10:262

Turner v. General Motors Corp., 514 S.W.2d497 (Tex. Civ. App. 1974) — 10:407

Turner v. International Harvester Co., 336 A.2d62 (N.J. Super. L. 1975) — 4:441–42

Tuttle v. Raymond, 494 A.2d 1353 (Me.1985) — 7:307

TVT Records v. Island Def Jam Music Group,257 F.Supp.2d 737 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) — 7:311

Twin Disc, Inc. v. Big Bud Tractor, Inc., 582F.Supp. 208 (E.D.Wis. 1984) — 3:33

Ultramares Corp. v. Touche, 174 N.E. 441 (N.Y.1931) — 2:182

TABLE OF CASES lxiii

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lxiii

Page 64: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Unicomp, Inc. v. Elementis Pigments, Inc.,1999 WL 1995400 (D.Me. 1999) 3:73–74

Union Stock Yards Co. of Omaha v. Chicago B.& Q.R.R. Co., 196 U.S. 217 (1905) — 9:57

Union Supply Co. v. Pust, 583 P.2d 276 (Colo.1978) — 10:20, 10:411–12

Unique Equipment Co. v. TRW Safety Systems,Inc., 3 P.3d 970 (Ariz. App. 1999) — 9:131

Uniroyal Chemical Co. v. American VanguardCorp., 249 Cal. Rptr. 787 (Cal. App.1988) — 9:47

United Novelty Co. v. Daniels, 42 So.2d 395(Miss. 1949) — 6:51, 6:54

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Slifkin,200 F.Supp. 563 (N.D.Ala. 1961) — 12:134

Upjohn Co. v. Freeman, 885 S.W.2d 538 (Tex.App. 1994) — 2:10, 7:186

Uribe v. Sofamor, S.N.C., 1999 WL 1129703(D.Neb. 1999) — 1:74

Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. 1(1976) — 12:170

Utah International, Inc. v. Caterpillar TractorCo., 775 P.2d 741 (N.M. App. 1989)—7:242

Valiga v. National Food Co., 206 N.W.2d 377(Wis. 1975) — 3:225

Valley Datsun v. Martinez, 578 S.W.2d 485(Tex. Civ. App. 1979) — 3:101

Vallillo v. Muskin Corp., 514 A.2d 528 (N.J.Super. App. Div. 1986) — 10:143–44

Vamos v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of New York,Inc., 627 N.Y.S.2d 265 (N.Y.C. Civ. Ct.1995) — 10:134

Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co, 37 Cal. Rptr.896 (Cal. 1964) — 8:17

Varilek v. Mitchell Engineering Co., 558 N.E.2d365 (Ill. App. 1990) — 8:66

Varwig v. Andersen-Behel Porshe/Audi, Inc.,141 Cal. Rptr. 539 (Cal. App. 1977) —2:47–48

Vassallo v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 696 N.E.2d909 (Mass. 1998) — 4:326

Velleca v. Uniroyal Tire Co., Inc., 630 N.E.2d297 (Mass. App. 1994) — 8:79

Venezia v. Miller Brewing Co., 626 F.2d 188 (1stCir. 1980) — 4:143–44

Ventricelli v. Kinney System Rent A Car, Inc.,383 N.E.2d 1149 (N.Y. 1978) — 6:81–83

Venturelli v. Cincinnati, Inc., 850 F.2d 825 (1stCir. 1988) — 8:121

Verb v. Motorola, Inc., 672 N.E.2d 1287 (Ill.App. 1996) — 7:108

Verba v. Ghaphery, 552 S.E.2d 406 (W.Va.2001) — 12:346

Verge v. Ford Motor Co., 581 F.2d 384 (3rd Cir.1978) — 4:246–48

Vergott v. Deseret Pharmaceutical Co., 463 F.2d12 (5th Cir.1972) 4:69

Vermeer Carolina’s, Inc. v. Wood/Chuck Chip-per Corp., 518 S.E.2d 301 (S.C. 1999) —9:102–03, 9:107–08, 9:114

Vermont Plastics, Inc. v. Brine, Inc., 79 F.3d272 (2nd Cir. 1996) — 2:220–21, 7:254

Vermont Plastics, Inc. v. Brine, Inc., 824F.Supp. 444 (D.Vt. 1993) — 7:254

Vezina v. Souliere, 152 A. 798 (Vt. 1931)—2:129Vickery v. Reliable Elec. Co., 703 F.2d 488 (10th

Cir. 1983) — 9:130Victor v. Nebraska, 511 U.S. 1 (1994) — 7:300Vierek v. Fibreboard Corp., 915 P.2d 581

(Wash. App. 1996) — 4:215Village of Chatham v. Board of Fire Comm’rs,

456 N.Y.S.2d 494 (App. Div. 1982) — 3:126Village of El Portal v. City of Miami Shores, 362

So.2d 275 (Fla. 1978) — 9:3, 9:7Villareal v. State, Dept. of Transportation, 774

P.2d 213 (Ariz. 1994) — 7:186Vincer v. Esther Williams All-Alluminum

Swimming Pool Co., 230 N.W.2d 794(Wis. 1975) — 4:134–36

Vineyard v. Empire Machinery Co., Inc., 581P.2d 1152 (Ariz. App. 1978) — 4:270

Vintage Homes, Inc. v. Coldiron, 585 S.W.2d886 (Tex. Civ. App. 1979) — 3:240

Virginia, United States v., 518 U.S. 515(1996) — 12:193

Vlases v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 377 F.2d846 (3rd Cir. 1967) — 3:147, 4:199–201

Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Marinelli, 628So.2d 378 (Ala. 1993) — 10:409–10

Vossler v. Richards Manufacturing Co., 192 Cal.Rptr. 219 (Cal. App. 1983) — 7:312–14

Vulcan Metals Co. v. Simmons Mfg. Co., 248 F.853 (2d Cir. 1918) — 2:29–31

Vuono v. New York Blood Center, Inc. 696F.Supp. 743 (D.Mass. 1988) — 10:35

W. M. Bashlin v. Smith, 643 S.W.2d 526 (Ark.1982) — 5:79

Wackenhut Applied Technologies Center, Inc. v.Sygnetion Protection Systems, Inc. 979F.2d 980 (4th Cir. 1992) — 12:180

Wagatsuma v. Patch, 879 P.2d 572 (Haw. App.1994) — 8:119

Wagner v. International Harvester Co., 611 F.2d224 (8th Cir. 1979) — 4:236–37

Wagner v. International Ry. Co., 133 N.E. 437(N.Y. 1921) — 5:40–41, 8:67

lxiv TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lxiv

Page 65: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Walker v. Clark Equipment Co., 320 N.W.2d561 (Iowa 1982) — 7:79, 7:159–60

Walker v. Mintec/International, 758 F.2d 73(3rd Cir. 1985) — 7:79

Walker v. Rinck, 604 N.E.2d 591 (Ind. 1992) —5:61

Walker v. Saurinet, 92 U.S. (2 Otto) 90(1876) — 12:147

Walker v. Stauffer Chemical Corp., 96 Cal. Rptr803 (Cal. App. 1971) — 4:251, 4:253

Wallace v. Bounds, 369 S.W.2d 138 (Mo.1963) — 6:167

Wallis v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., 384U.S. 63 (1966) — 5:487

Walls v. Jacob North Printing Co., Inc., 618N.W.2d 282 (Iowa 2000) — 10:196–97

Walsh v. Ford Motor Co., 298 N.Y.S.2d 538(N.Y. Sup. 1969) — 8:31

Walton v. Avco Corp., 610 A.2d 454 (Pa.1992) — 9:112

Walton v. Springwood Products, Inc., 663N.E.2d 1365 (Ohio App. 1995) — 5:269

Walus v. Pfizer, Inc., 812 F.Supp. 41(D.N.J.1993) — 7:108

Wankier v. Crown Equipment Corp., 353 F.3d862 (10th Cir. 2003) — 4:170

Wardlow v. City of Keokuk, 190 N.W.2d 439(Iowa 1971) — 7:179

Warfel v. Cheney, 758 P.2d 1326 (Ariz. App.1988) — 8:188, 8:190

Warfle v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., No. A-5263-97T3(N.J. Sup. Ct. App. Div., July 1, 1999) —10:434

Warren v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Chicago,519 N.E.2d 1197 (Ill. App. 1988) —10:134

Washington v. Department of Transp., 8 F.3d296 (5th Cir. 1993) — 10:145

Washington Water Power Co. v. Graybar Elec.Co., 774 P.2d 1199 (Wash. 1987) — 7:220

Wasylow v. Glock Inc., 975 F.Supp. 370(D.Mass. 1996) — 3:135, 4:180

Water Works & Indus. Supply Co. v. Wilburn,437 S.W.2d 951 (Ky. App. 1968) —3:204–05

Waters v. Markham, 235 N.W. 797 (Wis.1934) — 5:145

Watkins v. Jacobs Pharmacy Co., 171 S.E. 830(Ga. App. 1933) — 11:170–71

Watkins v. Toro Co., 901 S.W.2d 917 (Mo. App.1995) — 2:182, 4:222

Watson v. Navistar International Transp. Corp.,827 P.2d 656 (Idaho 1992) — 8:2

Watters v. Pelican International, Inc., 706F.Supp. 1452 (D.Colo. 1989) — 9:90

Watters v. TSR, Inc., 904 F.2d 378 (6th Cir.1990) — 4:428

Weaver v. Chrysler Corp., 172 F.R.D. 96(S.D.N.Y.1997) — 7:108

Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 406 U.S.164 (1972) — 12:173

Weber v. Armco, 663 P.2d 1221 (Okla. 1983) —5:297

Weise v. Keystone Mack Sales, 456 A.2d 1009(Pa. Super. 1983) — 3:90

Weissich v. County of Marin, 274 Cal. Rptr. 342(Cal. App. 1990) — 2:173

Weller v. Mack Trucks, Inc., 570 N.E.2d 1341(Ind. App. 1991) — 4:203

Wells v. Clowers Construction Co., 476 So.2d105 (Ala. 1985) — 4:414

Wells v. Ford Motor Co., 2001 WL 1262223(D.Md. 2001) — 4:152

Wennerholm v. Stanford University School ofMedicine, 128 P.2d 552 (Cal. 1942) — 2:83

Wentz v. Deseth, 221 N.W.2d 101 (N.D.1974) — 8:132

Werner v. Pfleiderer Corp., 697 F.Supp. 808(D.N.J. 1988) — 3:19

Werner v. Upjohn Co., Inc., 628 F.2d 848 (4thCir. 1980) — 10:102

Werth v. Makita Elec. Works, Ltd., 950 F.2d 643(10th Cir. 1991) — 10:381, 10:385

Werwinski v. Ford Motor Co., 286 F.3d 661(3rd Cir. 2002) — 7:272–75, 7:281–82

West v. Caterpilar Tractor Co., 336 So.2d 80(Fla. 1976) — 3:36

West v. Searle & Co., 806 S.W.2d 608 (Ark.1991) — 11:93

Westerman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 557 F.2d873 (5th Cir. 1978) — 8:79

Westlye v. Look Sports, Inc., 22 Cal. Rptr. 2d 781(Cal. App. 1993)—8:4, 8:9–14, 8:18–23

Westric Battery Co. v. Standard Electric Co.,Inc., 482 F.2d 1307 (10th Cir. 1973) —2:271

Wheat v. Sofamor, S.N.C., 46 F.Supp.2d 1351(N.D.Ga. 1999) — 4:152, 11:76

Wheeler v. Andrew Jergens Co., 696 S.W.2d 326(Ky. App. 1985) — 10:170

Wheeler v. John Deere Co., 935 F.2d 1090 (10thCir. 1991) — 5:174, 10:405–06

Whetham v. Bismarck Hospital, 197 N.W.2d678 (N.D. 1972) — 7:143–44

Whitaker v. Farmhand, Inc., 567 P.2d 916(Mont. 1977) — 8:17, 8:180

TABLE OF CASES lxv

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lxv

Page 66: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

White Construction Co. v. Dupont, 439 So.2d915 (Fla. App. 1983) — 7:184

White v. ABCO Engineering Corp., 221 F.3d293 (2nd Cir.2000) — 12:142

White v. Celotex Corp., 907 F.2d 104 (9thCir.1990) — 10:333

White v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 533 N.E.2d748 (Ohio 1989) — 11:52

Whitehead v. American Motors Sales Corp., 801P.2d 920 (Utah 1990) — 8:198

Whitehead v. Toyota Motor Corp., 897 S.E.2d684 (Tenn. 1995) — 8:153

Whitney v. Cubberly, 210 S.E.2d 289 (N.C.App.1974) — 11:120

Whittington v. Eli Lilly & Co., 333 F.Supp. 98(D.W.Va. 1971) — 3:55–57

Wiegand v. Walser Automotive Groups, Inc.,670 N.W.2d 449 (Minn. App. 2003) —2:112

Wiggs v. City of Phoenix, 10 P.3d 625 (Ariz.2000) — 12:76

Wilkinson v. Bayshore Lumber Co., 227 Cal.Rptr. 327 (Cal. App. 1986)—11:224, 11:228

Willard v. Park Industries, Inc., 69 F.Supp.2d268 (D.N.H. 1999) — 10:419

Williams v. A-Treat Bottling Co., Inc., 551 A.2d297 (Pa. Super. 1988) — 10:15

Williams v. Baker, 572 A.2d 1062 (D.C.1990) — 7:139, 7:141

Williams v. Beechnut Nutrition Corp., 229 Cal.Rptr. 605 (1986) — 4:141–42

Williams v. Braum Ice Cream Stores, Inc., 534P.2d 700 (Okla. App. 1974) — 11:8

Williams v. Bright, 658 N.Y.S.2d 910 (App. Div.1997) — 8:174–78

Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co., 261N.E.2d 305 (Ill. 1970) — 8:59–60

Williams v. Dow Chemical Co., 255 F.Supp. 2d219 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) — 2:65

Williams v. KOPCO, Inc., 1998 WL 159516(D.Kan. 1998) — 10:74

Williams v. Monarch Machine Tool Co., Inc.,26 F.3d 228 (1st Cir. 1994) — 5:106

Williams v. O’Brien, 669 A.2d 810 (N.H.1995) — 2:164

Williams v. Philip Morris Inc., 48 P.3d 824 (Or.App. 2002) — 2:52–53

Williams v. Pro-Tec, Inc., 908 F.2d 345 (8th Cir.1990) — 10:384

Williams v. Rank & Son Buick, Inc., 170N.W.2d 807 (Wis. 1969) — 2:102–03

Williams v. RCA Corp., 376 N.E.2d 37 (Ill. App.1978) — 6:100–02

Williams v. State, 707 S.W.2d 40 (Tex. Crim.App. 1986) — 12:337

Williams v. Tulsa Motels, 958 P.2d 1282 (Okla.1998) — 2:164

Williams v. Wilson, 972 S.W.2d 260 (Ky.1998) — 12:277

Williamson v. Smith, 491 P.2d 1147 (N.M.1971) — 8:132

Willis v. Mullett, 561 S.E.2d 705 (Va. 2002) —12:314

Wilson v. Dover Skating Center, Ltd., 566 A.2d1020 (Del. Super. 1994) — 4:36

Wilson v. Good Humor Corp., 757 F.2d 1293(D.C.Cir. 1985) — 1:28

Wilson v. Gordon, 354 A.2d 398 (Me. 1976) —8:132

Wilson v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 577 P.2d 1322(Or. 1978) — 1:133, 11:32

Wilson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Ins. Co.,654 So.2d 385 (La. App. 1995) — 12:127

Wilson v. U.S. Elevator Corp., 972 P.2d 235(Ariz. App. 1998) — 5:106

Wimberly v. Derby Cycle Corp., 65 Cal. Rptr.2d 532 (Cal. App. 1997) — 12:76

Winburn v. Insurance Co. of North America,339 S.E.2d 142 (S.C. App. 1985) — 2:176

Windham v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 786F.Supp. 607 (S.D.Miss. 1992) — 10:166

Wingad v. John Deere & Co., 523 N.W.2d 274(Wis. App. 1994) — 7:73

Wingett v. Teledyne Industries, Inc., 479 N.E.2d51 (Ind. 1985) — 4:104

Winnett v. Winnett, 310 N.E.2d 1 (Ill. 1974) —5:24–27, 5:56

Winston Bros. Co. v. United States, 371 F.Supp.130 (D.Minn. 1973) — 5:437

Winter v. G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 938 F.2d 1033(9th Cir. 1991) — 4:420–22

Winterbottom v. Wright, 10 M. & W. 109, 152Eng. Rep. 402 (1842) — 5:122–24

Wittkamp v. United States, 343 F.Supp. 1075(E.D.Mich. 1972) — 5:436, 5:438,5:470–71

Wolfe v. Dal-Tile Corp., 876 F.Supp. 116(S.D.Miss. 1995) — 4:413

Wolfe v. Ford Motor Co., 376 N.E.2d 143(Mass. App. 1978) — 10:153

Wood v. Bass Pro Shops, Inc., 462 S.E.2d 101(Va. 1995) — 8:80–81

Wood v. United States, 961 F.2d 195 (Fed. Cir.1992) — 5:434

Wood v. University of Utah Medical Center, 67P.3d 436 (Utah 2002) — 12:226

lxvi TABLE OF CASES

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lxvi

Page 67: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

Wood v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Div. ofAmerican Home Products, 82 S.W.3d 849(Ky. 2002) — 7:138

Woodbury v. United States, 192 F.Supp. 924(D.Ore. 1961) — 5:428

Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 681P.2d 1038 (Kan. 1984) — 10:153

Woodhill v. Parke Davis & Co., 374 N.E.2d 683(Ill. App. 1978) — 7:80

Woods v. Cole, 693 N.E.2d 333 (Ill. 1998) —10:209, 10:210–11

Woods v. Holy Cross Hospital, 591 F.2d 1164(5th Cir. 1979) — 12:194

Woodward v. Dietrich, 548 A.2d 301 (Pa. Super.1988) — 2:60–61

Worldwide Equipment Inc. v. Mullins, 11S.W.3d 50 (Ky. App. 1999) — 4:338

Wright v. Brooke Group Ltd., 114 F.Supp.2d797 (N.D.Iowa 2000) — 10:194–95

Wright v. Brooke Group, Ltd., 652 N.W.2d 159(Iowa 2002) — 2:21–22, 2:54–56, 4:170,4:299, 5:78

Wright v. Carter Products, Inc., 244 F.2d 53(2nd Cir. 1957) — 5:254–55

Wright v. Central Du Page Hospital Ass’n, 347N.E.2d 736 (Ill. 1976) — 12:255, 12:325

Wright v. Colleton County Sch. Dist., 391S.E.2d 564 (S.C. 1991) — 12:214, 12:305

Wright v. St. Mary’s Medical Center ofEvanston, Inc., 59 F.Supp.2d 794 (S.D.Ind.1999) — 7:21

Wycko v. Gnodtke, 105 N.W.2d 439 (Mich.1960) — 7:179

Y.H. Investments, Inc. v. Godales, 690 So.2d1273 (Fla. 1997) — 12:100

Yarrow v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 263 F.Supp. 159(D.S.D. 1967) — 5:83–84

Yasuda Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Lake ShoreElec. Co., 744 F.Supp. 864 (S.D.Ind.1990) — 7:248

Ybarra v. Spangard, 154 P.2d 687 (Cal. 1945) —10:272–74

Yellow Cab Co. of D.C., Inc. v. Dreslin, 181F.2d 626 (D.C. Cir. 1950) — 9:134

Yeroshefsky v. Unisys Corp., 962 F.Supp. 710(D.Md. 1997) — 5:503

Yolles v. Golf Club of Avon, 31 Conn. L. Rptr.587 (Conn. Super. 2002) — 8:184

Yong Cha Hong v. Marriott Corp., 656 F.Supp.445 (D.Md. 1987) — 11:8

Yost v. General Motors Corp., 651 F.Supp. 656(D.N.J.1986) — 2:145

Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, 922 P.2d 59(Wash. 1996) — 11:48

Young v. Up-Right Scaffolds, Inc., 637 F.2d 810(D.C.Cir. 1980) — 8:93

Yu v. International Business Machines, Corp.,732 N.E.2d 1173 (Ill. App. 2000) — 4:435,7:108

Yuhas v. Mudge, 322 A.2d 824 (N.J. Super. App.Div. 1974) — 4:49

Zaccone v. American Red Cross, 872 F.Supp.457 (N.D.Ohio 1994) — 10:34

Zachary v. Dow Corning Corp., 884 F.Supp.1061 (M.D.La. 1995) — 7:105

Zacher v. Budd Co., 396 N.W.2d 122 (S.D.1986) — 3:41

Zahrte v. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc., 661 P.2d 17(Mont. 1983) — 8:84

Zanakis-Pico v. Cutter Dodge, Inc., 47 P.3d1222 (Haw. 2002) — 2:222

Zanzuri v. G.D. Searle & Co., 748 F.Supp. 1511(S.D.Fla. 1990) — 11:93

Zebner v. Howard Johnson’s, Inc., 201 So.2d824 (Fla. App. 1967) — 11:8

Zeliff v. Sabatino, 104 A.2d 54 (N.J. 1954) —2:125

Ziegelmann v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., 649N.W.2d 556 (N.D. 2002) — 2:145

Ziglar v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours and Co.,280 S.E.2d 510 (N.C. App. 1981) —4:324

Zimmer v. Versa Products, 2000 WL 1421357(Iowa App. 2000) — 10:407

Zine v. Chrysler Corp., 600 N.W.2d 384 (Mich.App. 1999) — 2:23

Zwiercan v. General Motors Corp., 2002 WL31053838 (Pa. Com. Pl. 2002) — 7:276

TABLE OF CASES lxvii

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lxvii

Page 68: Products Liability and Basic Tort Law3.6.3.5 “Adequately Contained, Packaged, and Labeled” and “Conform to the Promise or Affirmation of Fact Made on the Container or Label”

kotler 00 fmt auto4 05.02.2005 1:33 PM Page lxviii