20
Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial Aggregation Segregation Association Studies Linkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype Characterization

Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Process of Genetic Epidemiology

Migrant Studies Familial Aggregation Segregation

Association StudiesLinkage Analysis

Fine Mapping Cloning

Defining the Phenotype

Characterization

Page 2: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Familial Aggregation

• Does the phenotype tend to run in families?

Page 3: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Recurrence (‘Familial’) Risk Ratios

• Compares the probability a subject is affected given they have an affected family member to the population risk:

R = KR/K,

where KR is the risk to relatives of type R

K is the population risk

S = recurrence risk to siblings of probands versus the

general population risk.

Page 4: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Recurrence Risk Ratios

R = P(Y2 = 1 |Y1 = 1) / K

P(Y2=1|Y1=1)P(Y1=1) = P(Y2=1, Y1=1)

P(Y2=1|Y1=1) = P(Y2=1, Y1=1)/P(Y1=1)

K = P(Y1=1)

R = P(Y2=1, Y1=1)/P(Y1=1)2

Page 5: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Estimating RRR

• With case-control data, calculate FRR as:Proportion of affected relatives of the cases

(observed) /

Proportion of affected relatives of controls (expected) (assumed to estimate K)

• The higher the value of , the stronger the genetic effect

Page 6: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Examples of s

• Alzheimer Disease 3-4• Rheumatoid Arthritis 12• Schizophrenia 13• Type I Diabetes 15• Multiple Sclerosis 20-30• Neural Tube Defects 25-50• Autism 75-150

Page 7: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

s versus GRR

• How well does s estimate the genetic risk ratio?

s = P(Y2=1|Y1=1) / P(Y2=1|Y1=0) ? P(Y2=1|D) / P(Y2=1|dd)

= GRR

Sibs disease not necessarily hereditary

At risk individual may not have inherited D

Sib unaffected doesn’t mean other sib doesn’t carry D

Page 8: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

GRR Dominant Recessive

q= 0.05 0.30

P(G)= 0.0975 0.09

2 1.04 1.03

5 1.36 1.26

10 2.00 1.74

50 4.12 3.45

s versus GRR

Page 9: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Heritability Analysis

• Evaluates the genetic contribution to a trait Y in terms of variance explained.

• Y = Genetics + Environment• Var(Y) = overall variation in phenotype Y

= Var(G) + Var(E) + 2Cov(G,E)

• Broad sense heritability:H2 = Var (G) / Var (Y)

where Var(G) = genetic part of variance

= VA+VD (Additive + Domince)

Page 10: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Narrow Sense Heritability

• Proportion of phenotypic variance that is explained only by additive genetic effects:

h2 = VA / Var (Y)

A number of ways to estimate heritability.

Commonly done with twin studies.

Page 11: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Twin Studies• Compare the phenotype correlation or disease

concordance rates of MZ (identical) and DZ (fraternal) twins.

Twin 1

Page 12: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

MZ Twins (Identical)

Twin 1

Twin 2

Both alleles are shared identical by descent (IBD)

Page 13: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

DZ Twins (Fraternal)

Twin 1

2 1 1 0

Twin 2: any of the four

IBD can be 2, 1, or 0

Page 14: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

DZ Twins (Fraternal)

Twin 1

100% 50% 50%0%

Average sharing is 50%

Page 15: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

IBD Sharing

# of alleles shared IBD2 1 0Pr(2) Pr(1) Pr(0) Prop IBD

Relationship Self, MZ twins 1 0 0 1Parent, Offspring 0 1 0 1/2Full siblings 1/4 1/2 1/4 1/2Gr-child, Gr-prt 0 1/4 3/4 1/4First cousins 0 1/4 3/4 1/8

Proportion of alleles shared IBD = # alleles x Pr(# alleles) / 2

Page 16: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Twin Studies• Assume MZ twins share all genes & envt., DZ

share ½ genes & all envt.• Correlation among twins:rmz = VA + VE

rdz = ½ VA + VE

where VE = common environment

H2 = 2(rmz- rdz )

• Heritability ~ two times difference in correlation between MZ and DZ twins.

Page 17: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Example of Twin Study: PCa

Twin Concordant pairs (A)

Discordant pairs (B+C)

Concordance

2A / (2A+B+C)

MZ 40 299 0.21

DZ 20 584 0.06

Heritability: 0.42 (0.29-0.50)Non-shared Environment: 0.58 (0.50-0.67)

Lichtenstein et al NEJM 2000 13;343:78-85.

• Twin registry (Sweden, Denmark, and Finland) 7,231 MZ and 13,769 DZ Twins (male)

Limitations of heritability calculations?

Page 18: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Segregation Analysis

• Study families.• Estimate ‘mode of inheritance’ & what type

of genetic variant might be causal.• Determine whether the disease appears to

follow particular patterns across generations.

• Estimate whether variants are rare or common, etc.

Page 19: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Segregation: Harry Potter’s Pedigree

Harry Potter

Lily Evans James PotterPetunia DursleyVernon Dursley

Dudley Dursley

Muggle

Wizard / Witch

Page 20: Process of Genetic Epidemiology Migrant Studies Familial AggregationSegregation Association StudiesLinkage Analysis Fine Mapping Cloning Defining the Phenotype

Segregation Analysis• What is the best model of inheritance for observed families?

• Dominant• Recessive• Additive

– Disease allele frequency?– Magnitude of risk?

• Fit formal genetic models to data on disease phenotypes of family members.

• The parameters of the model are generally fitted finding the values that maximize the probability (likelihood) of the observed data.

• This information is useful in parametric linkage analysis, which assumes a defined model of inheritance.