PROCEEDING International Conference

^ and Call for Papers (ICCP) UNS 2016

POLITICAL LAW 0?i CRIAIINAL JUSTICE SY STEM IN HANDLINGENYIRONMENT DEGRADATION

Riska Andi Fitriono, Hartiwiningsih, M. Hudi Asrcri S.rizkaaiidiS6"Sagnail.com, hartiwtSQif^ahoo.ccmiFaculty of Law, SebelasMarrt University

ABSTRACT

Indonesia, fwest area reached 99,6 million ha or 52.3% of the aitire tcmtory of Indonesia,but such a vast forest wealth is increasingly reduced due to the use of forests has ignoredthe aspect of pres^vation and protection of freest resources diemseives, such as conversionland, destruction and Qlegal deforestation, forest fires and illegal land, which have an impacton the loss of biodiversity and hydrological functions, social values, deforestation and landdcgradatioD continues to increase, the loss of lung Indonesia, the world's lungs as well asglobal wanning. The rate of deforestation in hidonesia reaches 1.6 to 2.1 million ha per yc^and recorded as a third country that experiaaced the world's fastest defrHestation. Everyminute of Indonesia's forest area was reduced to 6 times a football field, with losses everyyear to reach 31 trillicn, thus the loss of Indonesia's forests is significant, which is about130,000 kni2 each year, equivalent to the si2£ of the country Inggris Tidak criminal lawenforcement success due to forest fires in the absence of sinkronoisasi, synchror^ or harmoitystructurally, substantial and culturally in the crimmal justice sj-stem ffmn police agencies,prosecutors, courts attd correctional services. This study aims to assess and analyze How theCriminal Justice System In Tackling Bivironmaital Damage has been done and the legalpolitics How the Criminal Justice System is supposed In Tackling Environmental Damage.Factual conditions showed that the criminal justice system has not been well inlegraled in thesub-^stem of the police, prosecution, courts and institutions ponsayarakatan, consequenllvwas nc< able to addri^ and resolve maity cases of forest fires committed by a corporation inwhich telalia RIAU cause tremendous loss.

Keyword: Politics. Law, Criminal Justice System, Eavironment

CHAPTER f

INTRODCCTIOfff

A BACKGROLIND

Indonesia forest area reached 96 490.8 million ha or 51 53% of the entire territory ofIndonesia, 'but such a vast frarest wealth is increasingly reduced due to die use of forestshas ignored the aspect of preservatirm and protection of the forest resources itself such asland use, vandalism and illegal defmestatian, fmest fires and illegal land, which have animp^t on the loss of biodiversity' and hydrological functions, social values, deforestationand land degradation continues to increase, the loss of lung Indonesia, lungs ofthe worldas wdl as glotol warming defore^on in Indonesia reaches 1.6 to 2.1 million ha peryear and recwded as a third country that experiOTced the world's fastest deforestationEvary minute of Indonesia's forests reduced area of 6 times a football field, with losses

1 Statistics Minimvfd'EnvifODmeiit and Forestfy20J 4. Page 742 Hartminingsili, 2013, Ihc CiiSftiral Herilager PnxmMson Ur^^incy SunAarla In order Governance

Emirumnealal PmlecUon ondMcmagemerd of the Good in r/>eRi^iioiis.RcscsBch, JdkMa: DPD, Page 435

PROCEEDING Intemationial Conference

and Cali for Papers |8Ca»| QMS 2016 ^

every yesr to lesedi 31%iUi{Bi,lfaDS 9]be loss of fodtHiesia's fore^ is siggnficamt, -whidi isabtNd; 130,000 km2pwyeai[; equal to foe area of Abb UK. *

Thft cause of foe increasing degir^ation arad deftHest^UHi and land is foe lainiing offorests. Bumii^ for land preparaticm is ncA a new ffoetomoHm in tnqacal areas likebedfHKsia. During foe period of 1997 estimated to 13 finest fires in IndoiKsb^especially tm foe i^ands of BorrKO and Suanatia tiave raeug^raiiKaiskai snore foan 50milliGn ha flffosest and ncar-foiest areas. T(^ losses due to foe arui smoke arising firranfoe foe which is USD 3.8 brffiumfor btdtHiesia atsdUS $ 0.7 billion to foe ne^tboririgcountries affected, even acccHdh^ to estimates of ADB'stmal loss of at least USD 8549bilikm to S 9042 billioa^

Mrafo is used is by iHimmg, because by burnii^ less cost foan usitig nuMe espmsivemedranica] or diance. Thoi ffaemode, illegal lo^t^oHs of wood that has been cutis foaH^ in tbnaafoes tSffi aufomities cmty out foe i^jetatuHt, foe timba'cmnesfooan the cranmsmity and will be pvdtasoi fay the cmnpany. Source of the wood cmnesfioaju the forest lescarve. Other modes are brought 1000 per^le from Noafo Sumatracmnmraii^ to cut and bum dK forest biospiffire resolves, foe line of foe ipowOT is giveneach giri: 2 ha of finest lami woe deased and Innned. Oisce dean the plantatioaa wmddInqr dffi land fonn die peq}le.^

Hm |noMem is dffi crime of die finest foe diat occntied ten years ago; which is a crimewhite coilar crime is still ongmng and unresolved. Jini^ing firompolicy law eefmcemeMis md aicces^sl dim die criminalkw enfmemirad in die fidd of form fires are cansedby wedc law mfmceanent against arsoansls, data foom firmm the year 1998-2003 thaewrae 49 cases of arsosi ccnnmitted by the company, but ofiiy 2 cases wme processed andhas got a court dectsknr, rmncty FT Add jdantatirm and FT Jatim J^a Pedcasa both{dantotirHi compames Su^iect finest fire in tfo year 2014 mnounted to 103 pei^e, andmHsofdtcm is a cmporation (PT MSP) in several districts and cities^ h^a Giri Hilir 5,Pekanbasra 2, BengkaJis 26, Rokan Hilir 20, Palalawan 7, MeranQ Islands 4, Dumas 15,3 Town Rim Kam|»r 6 siispeds.^

ssmdrrossy or harmrmy stnnriurally, substantia! and mlturally in foe aiminaiss^em fiom police agencies, proseodms, cmirts and anrectidsnal seivicesi Thoefme,to ovmxnne fous inrfolem the gavanmmt dionld blmd mix p«-cqfoon^ bdiefe^,lespmses aod c«Hsce|«ts as well as {mbiic qphuosQ, law enforcement, namely foe pntieir,,jnosecidDt; judge, lawyer / adviser of law atd institutions pemss^rdcatan, and die usra:oirts»Saiiwiniiiy law^ the {dimomeDMHi of mv'isosMMmtal crinie is a crimnie remartraltie eamCTiga tremendous smp^t not cmly hrwiirtis lives Inrt also capatde of destroyii^ nature, die

Fasin Rj&raadani aid Zssiweb Pador 2<KI9, mmtsmtehm Ast^ SSto^gfitoMMBainEsJifaffra: IHSA-YLHBI-ltiiiiislenal Pmnetsii^ Page 2Agns PmsKBHo, 2®J2, Keqmg ForesSs SSta: Pms tmsiCtms Polity FamistMorcibiimm emdPeAA^swUx.Popniaa-lilnny (nanedia CKP(% 3EKero P ImmaD and Caeesio P SteaKZ, HSHSjCJetmisg wUhout himmig-A Model Qetmng withmlin Preparimg She Foreat Plcmtaiim lyeveiapsnenl OTlndanesiaPapars

hrip:iAffww.teaipo.coABadAiewsi2014«/19a86563493/19-«fl»M-liridtm4d»ii«HieAalcsff-riai™

UBysHio 2®07, Expermwe Ltm Esi^mmmid^lieed Fifes m dse ptmitaSesi area tmdHTIPetdSmwaigt.Pqisis. Rfoi; PPMS BAFEDAL, P^ SOBaitp:ifeewsh8Birai6.ccgaAiad@ffi2902g»iforidarriffit4el^|&aa-i-3^eirgamgfc forea-and-iasid

PROCEEDING fintematkmai CbfrferefTce

and Call for Papers (8CCP) UHS 2016

wsrid we. stsnd, pant^jerty aedlmiisan wdl^jdmg, therdeffe, i%eds to be addressedsmelly, i^tmninatioi^ omled in lite criminal system integiiBltiedln addition toovrnxme the prrticms of caifocemmt of criminal law in the eimrcmmeaital field is needfor judicial mie rooi^ r^mdy justice in which all siib-systems dial exist in die cnminaiju^ce syston, namely die pdice, pro^cutors, the judidary, lawyers, and correcticBia!institutions in the exercise of dul^ functional should be under one supervision, namelythe Miiustiy of Environment^

die fari|^S]xit unanswered enfcKTceincaitefirosts of Act Mo. 32Gf2CX)9, which in ArticleArticle 69 psffagrsqph 1 l^terh, each person isprohihited fiom: dearing land by burning.But unfcHtuontely diis artide is atlrauated% Article 69 pafagraph 2^ wfaidi states, dieprovisions refonred to in paragnaq[ih 1 letter h earnest attention of local knowledge indffiir respective areas. TermsisfourdoftmrnisusedbypeqpleardcorporatiorismRiauProvince on the open land fay burning the prdext of local knoi^edge, the habits of thepec^e of Riau is very dangerous.

BL FORMULATIOM ISSUES

Wiqf law enforcemeist officers who are sub-systems of criminal justice system has noSbeeaable to overcmne the evil of die bnming and destruction of forests are increatingly rampantdifectivdy?

How is die l^al political criminal justice system int^rated in dealing with criminal acts ofarson and deslnictimi of forests in oid^ to realize the criminal law enfiniosment towardsgcKid>fores%ovefnance?

C. PRESEMTATIOBJ OF DATA

Condiffon law Enforcmert fmrning and forest

lynm Msm»Patnsaa PeajaraKurang dari

VIEdiaal-S-fiihlBB

2009 106 11% 24 75

2010 66 9 24 67

2011 42 14 29 57

Scairce: Attoffiscy General's Office in 2011dsart 1: Condition Butnir^ Law KifcHicem^ and Fmest

Bescripiimi

above tdrie tiieai the law tiribrcenaieiit so the maximum iasnnmg woods yd because tii^areme stiU some getting acquittals, there ate still many also sentenced to prison less than

year when the effects of foaest fires aare very big losses. Lawenfiacos also ensnareperpdaalor of dm offense widiatendency use mdy The m^ority of the field perpetrators,corpofatiom lardy totK^hed.

^^U^^MM!^K^^^^jheCrsmimt!For^ryOperaior1moh^eiaa^McaDnmMhi\^For^sSfnX^s^cyM^hm^Aness

PROCEEDING Sntematlonal Conference

aitd Cal! for Papers OCCP)UWS2016

CHAFTERD

DISCUSSIO?!

A. Why law (aforcemrat officnts who are sab-systms of the crimmai jastice sjrstnnh^ mat iwen abte to ovcacorae the ev9 of the barniag aad destractioB of fore^ areiooreaaDgjly rarapaot effective1. CrteiaaiJraticeSyslealnThedmmirasLawPriitks

Politics^ Law is the legal policy <»- lines (policy) official about die law ffiat will beetnforced either by making new laws aiui with the rqdacemesit of die dd law, iniBite to achieve the objectives of the stalB."^in principle, the oiminal jastice sy^«n is die way couiiiies in faevrating »dciBinbatii^ dime in the ccanmoniiy. so th^ tim oimtnal justice Systran can beGcmsidraed as part of crime pievraitum policies are termed crimii^ politics isthe fsnotedimi of the cmnmsmity to achieve die main directives in form offetsdyahfraaan society, dtm^ die raiminal justice sydran diat is part of a pditicdomninal in essraice is also anpart of ''integraltfae policy to achieve kesdyahtraarai^jdety (social policy).

2. The CraamdJostkeSiystcra That HnsExecotedlqr Law EofcwcaaeBt Officials laThcUii^ Ciirae Baraiag aad FmestTo adthess this issue, must first diiihat goal judiciai Systran in our country, whoreacccidiag to Marjtmo Rdcsodiputio can be focmulaled as follows:at Pievent peqpile to become viciims of crime.b. Resdving cases of raimes so that per^e are satisfied tbatjiistice has berai dome and

she gJiiSty punished.

C- Ensuring liiat they've consmitted a ciinme not to mpsal the rairnie.

dm raanptHients are involved and cotqierate in diis Systran are the pdice, in die case ofire rawmBimrait was also involved investigatars in BAPEDAL in the first levd local,BAPEDALDAlevd H Office/Office of fmestiy in dm regitm levd H. Fuidiei; it is dieposecuttB; die Suparane Court, lawyas mid cosradtimia! institntifflis.''

The five coanpfflicnts are expected to work tt^edier to frarm what is known as the"iMegna&l crinamd justice system" are intootmiKcted in a system tfoit is olten used

tram "system of crimmai justice", omsiding of subsystems -subsistran pdke,investigates fe the case of the rawiranment and forest fires, the Courts, the SuparaneComL lawyers aid P^utentiaiy. Where tK^twerai subsystems widi eadi od^ areintenMBmected, so that in case of ceiflict in one subsystem will hawe an impaot on thesiisy^rans next

Tliiai^ tmfiair premmabfy wdien onfy mraitsfm one of die parties has die langrrtcmdrilsitKHi e the mort: respomibJe fe the poor prafoamance law radbrcranraitrareinaimraitd raime in Imfoascsiffl at this time;, becaim the potsr prafosmaiKe erf thecriminal justice Systran is cuiTrai% die respcHisibiiiiy of all parties, be it die fxdice,inve^g^tos, fHosecuto; jm%e, pdilic (business, govranment, the communiiy itsdf)

1®

31

12

MoiiMdfiHlMD,2009, Poiiiicx, Lcm fafcwmi: PTB^a firafiiMln t»aw^ 1Miiadi, i^^CepirnSelectaCTmmdJmafX&ytimt^iammims: BadypQliidiraUnkmitaslX|Nai<%amiafl^liot&MaditmoRdtatodipodaa.ti^CimiiaaIJiBake.Syrtmil.Mlinm^a>(Tlignntf-nnAssort Oime), Qooled Fnaa, Hibb»j R%jias in CkimiBd Aistke System, J994, Page 84

13 in die bmA Mamuli 2015, dte Ciimmei Justice SysSem in the Jkld of PnOeakmPemMmsOmiwsBmmiUtimtis: Adbtevement 6

PROCEEDING ir^tematicmai Cbofer^mce

' and Caii for Papers (ICCP) QMS 2016

dfiai ha^ cQfibilHited to tthc tfiie fall of Iti^ asidiraity of iSie law in

emrirannicxital crime can katagorikan as a crime in flte eccmomic field in die broadestsense, becai£se the coverage of crime and pdanggagaran essviroiimeail broadear dianciHiventicmal dimes c^er effects resulting in econcHnic losses exfiacmiinafy country, aswdl as impacting on ttse destrialion of die environment

SysfoooL oriminal justice as cfie of dfie die taite to i^event and solve dim^ that occisrin the c^Hiiniunity, certainly has a very big role to prevent and crmtrol earvironmaitaldimes that can be categorized as an exttramdinaiy crime (extfaotdinary crimes.)Butin fact, it turns out i^slem criminal justice bas nPt been able to work oftimaily in thepreventidi and mitigatiim of environmoital crime in Indkmesia.

Poiicc fnstitiite as a subsy^tonn of eriininal justice is die frdit guard or die cuttii^ed^fcr die disclosure of d&e case indie fieldofmvironment That is^ the success cm:failure ofdisclosure of environmental crimes in IsKkeesia aU dq[id]ds cm foresight, skill, ahitity,and cominitment of the investigators.

M die criminal justice system allows pcdic:e subsystems diforcement duties preventivemd nqpsressive- Prevdstive tasks carried ifssA by the police with tt»s support and activeparticipaticm of die community. If pseventicMi efFoits are not successful, the piitce makedScHts that are repressive.

When you see a blurred poatrait handlist of environmental crime in Indanesia, thepolice subsystdns has ccKitrilnited gieady to die poOT errfbrcdnent of criminal law in theenvironmental field The reason, among others, fircm the asf:^ of the structure, policeck> not have a specific policy on handlii^ erases of environmental dime that is national,m too do not appear to have a special division that prepared the national police widiimman resources adequate to address environmdital issues, sudh as division of tacklingcooupticm, narcc^cs, pencucoian mcmcy and odieis.^^

Judging from the optical system of criminal justice. Law No. 32 of 2009 on theFMieiction and Environmental Management are overiappang aufiidity, in which diedvfl sdvant investigators (investigalois) in di^ environmdital field is no IcHsger limitiedto coordination, but also audioiized to conduct prosecutions. With so transmitted, thele^t of the arrest, detenticn and mvestigation submitted to the pdbiic prosecutor whocomdinated widi die police. TTiis provision aipears in protest at die poor ji^nfonnanceof the pdlice in uncoveairig cases durisig this envirminient If these provisions are imtmntiialty understood diere will be overlapping audiority, and land seizure investigatkm,whacfa ewentaialty led to a feud between the police and invesSigaSiors.

M arklstBon to police agendes, the Atlmney InstituliQn is also a leading institution dalamumiQver crimes cases indie otvironinentalfield. As aleading institntioii, die in^itutionof d^ pnosecutor 1^ a feBrmidabie tadc, because it is revealed wfadAi^ or not a case

depends on die finesse, the precision of the paroseoitcr in making demands. Fcr example,if das disclose ofdto case win Ix? continiBMi or iiot depeids ondie iiijttitutionprosecuttffl:But it seems this institution is v«y slow even notreacty to handle environmental cases,vdiidi mdbcd requires^ specific kzmvdedge about die erivironmeiit and aiiterdisciplifiaiy.Evidbticed by the dow filing and even the iailures in the making of filing in handlingenvironmcntol cases which often involve higb-prafile entrepreixnrs, inability andii^ctimofdiein^itutiondu^toL^ 16 of2CKM on the Prosecutor of tibe Republic

14 M Hsfiditt Mliajad 2008^ E^mssmeMan Jaiy nagjanmagk.

PROCEEDING Inteimatjonal Conference

and Caiy for Papers CiCCP) UWS 2016

<]f Indaaiem faas given an extreandiy broad space fcr gDverranoital interventatsi /jmHccoto's niluig ag^n^die agone^, whki&paitdie jHOsectdiiH'^s office as a govennnent:in^tibdkm only be one ctHmptHient of dte exeodive. This is undra^bmdaUe because dfie^tnicfoie of c(Bistituti<»iaI prosecufer adaiah part of die govenuneait, l]» was die oaK vdiomqiseseids the state in filing die case to court as a pioseciftiKr agaii^ illqial acticms; so kisoaftinaJ that the instituticm ispoiceived as a tool of the govomiQiL As an iistitiitiiHBdiai: stmids on two intcaests^ cm one hand it adts as an i»ivaGate of govemmoit, but onthe bdiorlmnd because die prosecidcr has die educaticBial badk^cmndoflam^asdielawhe undd be in favca: of justice. It happens jmd ambivalent in performing their duties^Itesefor^ it is nec^sary m' dq^eadmcy in ccmducting tlm jHosecmtkm, ccmipletd^indepotidenl: and free from inSuKice of rmy party.

In iditifBi, dm iaihire of the prosecmtcBr is also dim to inadecjuate qjoaiity of humanresources. To handle cases tec]aiied envircmmontai prosecutors wiio love knowledgein the field of die envtrcmmeiit must be cpiaiified, as weii as the science related to themvuTDnmrait most be coutroiled, formaliy {Kosecutor hmidling the mvinmrnent mn^

abesatymenadaiiat special educatkm about the enviroranent, so it is afaJetoprove. Ifthesedun^ are r&ottnecessfflity controlled Ityfeiluteseiicaantraed. In additirm^ pmopniirnrg ingenend me still bound by the pffiadigm ofpositivistic, wheae iamght into his ktMivdedgevm limited to the wittm law alram or a vmy &!gi?/is#ic-pa$to»s/zc. hi coiHnectiaaB withdie above, dim of course we need a refimn in order to build political grdkum criminalju^ice tysten ml^jrated for pevmting and oHnbatii^ die arme of tmmiiig fjffests inIndimBsta.

IwdiermiH^ accotdmg to Barda Nawawi Aiirf,die system criininai Ju^ticein essmce a"sydtmi of oriminal law mforcement aidhority^ which is manifesied in 4 (four) subsystems. nmndy:1. Rjwh" '*inve^igati(Hf (by Agmty / Institute havestigatcr)2. Power "Prosecahon" (Ity Agency /Institide of Pufajic nrosecutirHis)3. POwer"madPassir^ Drcjiping judgment / criminal"' (the Fandiraaiiy)4. Kekuasaan''Execution DecasioM^ ofCrimmal (tw Agenfy /Ap^K»rghigTw»pl«»n»/MipB|g

/Execadion).

As has been, stated r^ardu^ law enfmcmient in the criminal justice sydem briedty, asm effort to diow diat ftar a goal drat 1ms been sdl, there needs to be integratiflBi luSwemsidBtyrtems, and if it does rrot b^^jm feared aihtystmis drat will run <m dieir own, whichindmendisntddieeiqpectBdgesults^bidjustlfaeoiqiasite. Similarly, law enforcmimtm fimert Clime Ity means of/lenaf (criminal law) as the primaiy means, ttoi in case ofmeqodity, would bSont the workings of die criminai jnsrifw;

POUnCAL LAW CRIMIMAL JUSTICE SYffTEM MMTEI^ATED INTAdOJNG CRIifE BURNING AND FOREST Di ORDER TO ACHIEVECRIMINAL lAW ENFORCEMENT TOWARDS FORESTGOOB GOVERNANCE

To ovetcrmie die weaknesses in die Irandling of cases of arstm and rffosests needed a new initiated approadi. The law oraforcemmt approach is calledsMeg^vOedcrimiaalJusticesystem api[«wsSitt}ax:iSie Int^tated Criminal Justice Sydem.Tftas pp^omdi can not be dtme pnoperiy wstfand any device and rdeirant ofTi«npnaraff«rf«

15 BadaMaieawa AiM; 2IM88, amed'law EBfrnroeiniat aadPicveat^ Crimifftolkyjdtetia:Broia&i Media Gnmp, Pige 39

PRtXEEDiNG international Conference

and Call for Papers C8CCP| UWS 2016

The device is a means or totds imcessaiy to be dble to cany ojii jaw raifarcemait^^oadtes drat are 8nt(^irated,^^ulec{Bnp(nieiit refers to imtitntitHistSiatpl^araie inmsgdemoiting the afipnoads of the Griminal JiBtice Sy^ra hslqgrated

This section describes the concqrtual uodopinnings of the Modd Criminal Justice^slran hitegmtediised to ccmbatfoarest fires and other crimes associitai with it This

^^Hoodi is differ^firmn file comnumly used ^HDach^whiditai:^ only fi aismustsfisest by using the legal firamewioak and institutioiis rdated to the fidd of forestry. This

indudes a variety of devices and Ixoader institutioml msd results are expectedto be rqdmal in pnrtedting fmesis and the forestry sectm in Indasiesia.

GeagntpUc Iitfomadon SlpstaHS (Geogra|fiiic Infonaatkm Systm)GeogfVfhic btfonmtion System (GIS) is a conqnita: tyston Ito has fi» ability toentry, retnevai, <k&a aisatysis mid display geogr^fiiic data that is extrmndy useM fimdtedsicnmakii^ The main benefit is its ability to deliver GIS spatial data, incrapcratii^geqgptyhic infmmatum c^fiuied fimn fiie map m ta attiiiaites of a locatimi. GIS isdso aide to receive mtps ofvarious scales ard ptt^ecfioais ard convert it iitto a stmtdmdscde so tlmt file results oibtained are dso becomit^

has bem widety used for file management oflaid r^ in agrioiilnie, forestry and fileconslnKtitBi of settlements and facilities. One of its uses in forestry is to caltmlate therate md the magnitude ard location of^deforesiation.By using GIS, qmtid mialysis canbe done emsily and quiddy, as well as fmr mmiitoring drmiges in fore^ covo: BecausetSm G3S is also a very efiecdve control tool to measure fire extent to which fore^ aremanaged sustainahty by file parties concerned wifii the forest

Estimation Lrimes i^vironraeBt and Stale LossApproach usii^ the Anti-Cflmnqptian Law and anti-money lamdorii^ is dosdy rdated tofits amoimt of state losses caused by {Hactices the prmrtice of ftnestiy crimes. Ttenefotecalculate or edimate the cost of envinmmental damage and the amount of sTatf. Jossesdue to ifefmedatiiKi, fiarest fires md ille^ logging are importmiL Based Wasis (2008)infiffi Minishy of Qiviroament (^KI6). timatedfise codof mvinmmoitai damage canbe done by calculator the costs diK to ecdogica! <banage,eco[KBniclosses mid costs ofenvironmental restoration.

Tte caloilation of file ecological damage dome inditedly by the dbstnodcHi of fi»oivirouuient due to destructian of fbae^ ard land. These losses are calculated by fiiecod of mddng fiie reservoir or rbm, fiie cost of vmfer regulatioit fiie cost of ccmtrotlingerosirai and mnoffi. the cost of soil formation, fiie cod of rerydirg nutrioits, the cost ofrkcomposii^ wade; fio; cost of biodiversity, the of genetic lesooees^ as wdl as thecods of disposal of carbon porhedtare, Ckr file basis of Article 32 of Law No. 31 of 1999on tin; adicaticn of C(Bni{fiion (heieinafim'Law on ComqdonX the ammmt of loss ttecoudty based em tlK findings of fi aufiiorized agetH^ (BPK / BFKP) cm file results ofthe audit accoimtant ap^MBiited by the investigalor."^

16 Yii&s^m&,y^29l^,ljati!iiEnfimxmefSAgia!imsfinegfil'iml>erTn!deCrm^lKJheCrimimiJui^ictSivStaa.

IlKsk. GMde l^ognni HIUI Silkies; l^aita, IndhMiesia.17 PelMeddiwrtfcfBgwwaassofBeiiMtviagiiifliBalSHegastywyd'inggiagiBgtimiwrigtochaBgiBltelffliBl

me dfioest to iMiffirfiHest Can also be cmsed by fiHKd fines eiiS^iireatei»!^ w nitenril!r wcaniBg.18 'Ws^i)Bo,R.2tStl61%axissimi<taLacrsB9QannBpti<Bi;Mi^la:&iarGrafika.

PROCEEDING Sntemiatkinai Conference

aind can lor Papers (iCCP) UWS 2016

CHAPTER m

COMCLVSIONS

law raifcHcanent officers who are sub-systems die criminal justice slem is not cuiteitllycap^e of tadding oime of arson and deslnurticn fme^ because there is no integrationb^weoi sub^stons, and if it does not hajqien feared sidi^stons that will run cm tfadr own,winch in dm end is not dm expected ieailts.butjust the opposite. Similarly, law enftHcanoitcm fiitest oime by means of pemd (caiminal law) as dm {nimaiy mean^ then in case ofinerpalil^, wmiid blunt the workings ofthe criminal jusdce sydmn.

Prdilical Law Criminal Ju^ce Systran bit^rated In Taciding Crime Butniiig and ForestIn oodrar to Achieve Criminai law EnfirnxmeM Towards Gttod f^vst GovemcoKe by mitonly toig^ing die perpetrators of forest dies by using the 1^1 fiamewcsk and instituticuisndaled to die fidd of fmesliy. This aj^proach indudes a variety of deviims and broaderinsdintitHial and results are expected to be c^ma! in proteding fmeds and dm finestiysectiM-in Indonesia.

REFEREMCES

Agus PanKHUo^ 2012, Keejring Forests Kita: Pros atui Cims Ptdky Monaorium ForestsrsffidPeatJakmta: lifataty PcfH]]arGr3tnedia(iG*G)L

BardaMatwawi Arief, 2008, issim ofLaw Erifoteement and Oime Preventiaii Policy, Jakaota:KencaimPrenada Media Grcnip.

Eteycmo, TSMH, the Law Et^rcemeat experiemx Rdated to Fire on Forest PUmtatian andHTI PeatSwmspP^sas, Riasr PPHS BAPEDAL

^iezer P Lorenzo and Canesio P Muno^ 2013, tim Latui Opening without buming-A ModelClearingwlthoul Rakrin Preparing Pl/mlalum FomM De^li^muoa mlndonesia papwrs

Faziin Rahnnmlmii and Zoiwoi Padkv 109, manyatukanAsa, &rengt/renMeasares,Jakarta:IHSA-YLHBI-Ministaial Paituaidup.

bttp:/^mws.liputan6.com/read/2029020/polda-Tiau-tetapkan-]-3-tersangka-peinbakarfcned-arsd-land

Hartiwiningsib, 2013, dm SkiUe Cultural Heritage preservation Urgettcy Skircduuta In ordergovernance Envimnmenlal Pmteciion ondMmagemera of the Good in theRs^am.Researdi, Jakarta: DPD.

Http://www.leai{K>.cQ/read/news/2014/03/19/206563493/19-riburliTktar-lahan-trarbakar-riaurct^irlS-tril^un

IN^srmli Mrnddai; 2015, dm CriminalJmtice System in diefield of Environmental PrcrteOionaiidPei^(d^n,Jakarta: PostakaAcdiievenaent

Mardjooo Rdrsodipodra, the Criminal Justice System huionesia (The Role of Law

^ifoaceiiiraatAgaiiistCrimeX QmitedFrann, Human Rights in Criminal JudiimSystetn,1994.

M Hadin Muhjad 2008, EnvifvnmentafLawJSwijarmasm

Mohh^Mnfiid MD, 2009, Ptditics, Law ralrrfonesiajakairta: PT R^a Gtafindo.

PRCXXEDING tntemationa! Cc»iiierertce

and Caii for Papers fSCCPj UWS 2016

yadada, \^9S,CegpitaSelectaCrimimdJmticeS>y^iem^aaaaBa^ Bod^Pidili^brarDiponegoraUniveasity

StatfMics Minisby ixf^winsmieat and Foaesliy 2014

'Wkrtimngsih, 2S3\4,criminal Forestry Operator mvoivement and AccountabilityForearl^yPolicy^Mallang: Eqaivalent Pm^

W^CBio^ R. 20(^ Discussion tm Law cm CtBn^oo, Jakarta; SioarGtafika.

Yiiiiastuti, E,, 2005, Law Enforcement A^imst Illegal Jmiher Trade Crime In The criminalJwaiceSyStssnLlhssis. Graduate Piro^gram FHUI Lc^ Studies; Jakarta; In^Miesia.