33
Probing Flavor Ratios and Flavor Transitions Mechanisms of Astrophysical Neutrinos by Neutrino Telescopes By G.-L Lin National Chiao-Tung U. Taiwan K.-C. Lai, G.-L. Lin and T. C. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 80, 103005 (2009); Phys. Rev. D 82, 103003 (2010) T. C. Liu, M. A. Huang and G.-L. Lin, arXiv:1005.5154 F.-S. Lee, G.-L. Lin, T. C. Liu and Y. Yang, in progress Pacific 2011, Moorea

Probing Flavor Ratios and Flavor Transitions Mechanisms of ...Probing Flavor Ratios and Flavor Transitions Mechanisms of Astrophysical Neutrinos by Neutrino Telescopes By G.-L Lin

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    9

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Probing Flavor Ratios and Flavor

    Transitions Mechanisms of

    Astrophysical Neutrinos by Neutrino

    TelescopesBy G.-L Lin

    National Chiao-Tung U. Taiwan

    K.-C. Lai, G.-L. Lin and T. C. Liu,

    Phys. Rev. D 80, 103005 (2009); Phys. Rev. D 82, 103003 (2010)

    T. C. Liu, M. A. Huang and G.-L. Lin, arXiv:1005.5154

    F.-S. Lee, G.-L. Lin, T. C. Liu and Y. Yang, in progress

    Pacific 2011, Moorea

  • Outline

    • Review on possible types of astrophysical neutrino sources

    • What can we learn by detecting these neutrinos?

    (1) the original neutrino flavor ratio at astrophysical source-assuming three flavor oscillations

    (2) the neutrino flavor transition mechanism during its propagation from source to Earth—with a clear knowledge on the source flavor ratio

    ‧Answering the above questions by flavor discriminations in neutrino telescopes

  • (1,0,0)

    (0,1,0) (0,0,1)

    ( ) ( ) ( )( )( ) ( ) ( ) 1

    ,,

    000

    0000

    =++

    τµ

    τµ

    νφνφνφ

    νφνφνφ

    e

    e

    ( )1,1,02

    1−

    ( )1,1,26

    1−●(1/3,2/3,0)

    Common astrophysical neutrino sources

    νe

    νµ ντ

    From πdecays

  • Pion source (1/3,2/3,0)

    ee ννµ

    νµπ

    µ

    µ

    ++→

    +→++

    ++

    Energies of various neutrinos are comparable, i.e.,

    muon decays before losing its energy by interactions.

    Cosmogenic (GZK) neutrinos produced by

    and the subsequent pion decay fit into this category.

    ++ +→∆→+ πγ np CMB

  • Muon damped source (0,1,0)

    ee ννµ

    νµπ

    µ

    µ

    ++→

    +→++

    ++

    Muon loses significant amount of energy before it decays:

    (1) muon interacts with matter

    J. P. Rachen and P. Meszaros, 1998

    (2) Muon interacts with background photon field

    M. Kacherliess, O. Ostapchenko and R. Tomas,

    arXiv: 0708.3007

    Neutrino flux from muon decays is negligible

    See more detailed studies in

    T. Kashti and E. Waxman Phy. Rev. Lett. 2005

    P. Lipari, M. Lusignoli and D. Meloni, Phys. ReV. D 2007

  • T. Kashti and E. Waxman Phy. Rev. Lett. 2005

    Transition from pion source to muon-damped source

    ⇒due to particle density and background field strength at the source

  • S. Hummer, M. Maltoni, W. Winter,and C. Yaguna, Astropart.

    Phys. 34, 205 (2010).

    Systematically studying sources on Hillas plot

    ( ) 2−∝ pp EEφ

  • Sources with significant ντ fractions

    Neutrinos from WIMP annihilations

    Tau lepton and b can decay into ντ

    bb,−+→ ττχχ

  • Reconstructing the neutrino flavor ratio

    at the source

    ( )( )( )

    ( )( )( )

    ( ) iiii

    i

    e

    e

    e

    eeeee

    UUUPP

    PPP

    PPP

    PPP

    νννν

    νφνφνφ

    νφνφνφ

    αααβαβαβ

    τ

    µ

    τττµτ

    µτµµµ

    τµ

    τ

    µ

    *2

    3

    1

    2

    0

    0

    0

    where, ==→≡

    =

    ∑=

    Measured flux Φ

    Flavor EigenstateMass Eigenstate

    Uααααi contains 3 mixing angles--θ12, θ23, and θ13one CP phase δ

    Source flux Φ0

    Standard neutrino

    oscillations

  • Reconstructing the neutrino flavor ratio at the

    source--continued

    • How well can we distinguish astrophysical sources

    with different neutrino flavor ratio, assuming three

    flavor neutrino oscillations?

    • This depends on our understanding of neutrino

    mixing parameters and flavor discrimination

    capabilities in neutrino telescopes.1σσσσ

    3σσσσ Normal hierarchy

  • Flavor discrimination capability

    At water Cherenkov detectors such as ANTARES, IceCube

    and KM3NeT, track to shower event ratio can be used to

    extract the flux ratio

    In appropriate energy window, one can further identify tau

    shower so that one can measure

    J. F. Beacom et al. Phys. Rev. D 2003, arXiv: hep-ph/0307027v3

    W. Winter, Phys. Rev. D 74, 033015 (2006).

    ( )( ) ( )τ

    µ

    νφνφ

    νφ

    +=

    e

    R

    ( )( )τνφνφ eS =

  • Flavor discrimination--continued

    ( )( ) ( )τµ νφνφ

    νφ+

    = eR '

    ( )( )τ

    µ

    νφ

    νφ='S

    In newly proposed Askaryan Radio Array (ARA)

    with Eν>1017 eV, νe may be separated from other flavors By LPM effect. One can determine

    ARA Collaboration: P. Allison et al.

    arXiv: 1105.2854

    At this energy, it is difficult

    to measure

    E. Bugaev et al., Astropart. Phys. 21, 491 (2004).

    ( )( ) ( )τµ νφνφ

    νφ+

    = eR '

  • ARA sensitivity on GZK neutrinos

  • Water Cherenkov detectors (astrophysical sources)

    Only R is measured Both R and S are measured

    15% accuracy

    (~100 events)

  • Radio wave detectors (GZK neutrinos)

    Only R’ is measured Both R’ and S’ are measured

    15% accuracy

    (~100 events)

  • Summary for part I

    • We have reviewed various sources of

    astrophysical neutrinos with different neutrino

    flavor ratios.

    • The possibility of reconstructing the above

    flavor ratios through flavor discrimination in

    neutrino telescopes is discussed.

  • Probing neutrino flavor transition

    mechanisms—model independent

    parameterizationThe flavor transition mechanisms of

    astrophysical neutrinos might be probed.

    Earlier discussions on this issue:G. Barenboim and C. Quigg, Phys. Rev. D 2003,

    J. Beacom et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003 …

    Work out P model by model and calculate the

    resultantΦwhich is to be tested by neutrino telescope.

    However, we perform a transformation

    Classification of flavor transition models can be

    done easily on Q. Fit Q to the measurement

    0Φ=Φ P source fluxterrestrially measured flux

    .1PAAQ −=

    K.-C. Lai, G.-L. Lin and T. C. Liu,

    Phys. Rev. D 82, 103003 (2010)

  • (1,0,0)

    (0,1,0) (0,0,1)

    ( )1,1,0 −

    ( )1,1,2 −−●(1/3,2/3,0)

    bab

    bba TTT

    −≤≤+−

    ≤≤−−−+−+=Φ

    3/11/3

    3/11/6 ,)1,1,2()1,1,0()1,1,1(3

    10

    TTT )1,1,2()1,1,0()1,1,1( −−+−+=Φ λρκ

    κ=1/3 corresponds to conservation of neutrino flux

    νe

    νµ ντ

    ( ) ( ) ( )( )Te τµ νφνφνφ ,,

    ( ) ( ) ( )( )( ) ( ) ( ) 1

    ,,

    000

    000

    =++ τµ

    τµ

    νφνφνφ

    νφνφνφ

    e

    T

    e

    0Φ=Φ P a=-1/3,b=0

    a=-1/2,b=-1/6

    a

    b

  • A simple transformation

    .

    111

    111

    201

    with

    where,

    3/1

    1

    333231

    232221

    131211

    333231

    232221

    131211

    −−=

    =

    =

    A

    A

    PPP

    PPP

    PPP

    A

    QQQ

    QQQ

    QQQ

    b

    a

    QQQ

    QQQ

    QQQ

    e

    e

    eeee

    τττµτ

    µτµµµ

    τµ

    λρκ

    ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

    ( ) ( ) ( ) κνφνφνφ

    νφνφνφλνφνφρ

    τµ

    τµµτ

    3

    23

    1 ,

    2

    1

    =++

    +−=−=

    e

    e

    Pαβ≡P(νβ�να)

    0,11 131211 ===⇒=∑ QQQPα

    αβ

    This then implies κ=1/3Gives the meaning of

    Q matrix

  • Classify flavor transition models

    Flux conservation

    =

    333231

    232221

    001

    QQQ

    QQQQ

    Flux conservation+νµ--ντ symmetry

    =

    3331 0

    000

    001

    QQ

    Q

    Values for Q31 and Q33determine the model

    Fit Q31 and Q33 to the data

    limit 0,45 1223°° == θθ

    Recent T2K result makes it more complicated.

  • Q matrix for standard oscillation

    =

    3/100

    000

    001

    Q

    0sin

    ,3/1sin

    ,2/1sin

    13

    2

    12

    2

    23

    2

    =

    =

    =

    θ

    θ

    θ

    9/cossin29/2cos2 1323 δθθε +≡

    i.e., Q31=0, Q33=1/3

    Evaluated in tribimaximal

    limit:

    To the first order in

    −=

    3/10

    300

    001

    εεQ

    0.27/3

    3/24.03

    −=

    −=− ε Normal hierarchyInverted hierarchy

    Take T2K best fit: sin22θ13=0.11 (N), 0.14 (I) atδ=0Also assume θ23=π/4

  • Q matrix for neutrino decays—just for illustration

    =

    002/1

    000

    001

    Q

    Normal hierarchy Inverted hierarchy

    3

    2

    1 3

    2

    1

    =

    002/1

    000

    001

    Q

    i.e., Q31=0.5, Q33=0i.e., Q31=-0.5, Q33=0

  • Observing pion source and muon damped

    source to determine Q31 and Q33

    3/

    0

    3/1

    3/1

    0

    000

    0013/1

    31

    3331

    Q

    QQ

    =⇒

    =

    λ

    λρ

    6/3/

    6/1

    2/1

    3/1

    0

    000

    0013/1

    3331

    3331

    QQ

    QQ

    −=⇒

    =

    λ

    λρ

    Pion source

    Muon-damped source ( )( ) ( )

    +−≡

    23

    1 τµ νφνφνφλ e

  • 1σσσσ

    3σσσσ

    NHIH

    OSC

    Compare oscillation with neutrino decays (H, M�L)

    ( )( ) ( )τ

    µ

    νφνφ

    νφ

    +=

    e

    R Water Cherenkov detector ~50 events

  • Change the input model

    IH

    OSC

    NH

  • Change the input model--continued

    OSC

    NHIH

  • GZK neutrino dominates at Eν>1017 eV

    We have a pure pion source

    ( ) ( ) ( ) 3/23

    1

    so ,

    0

    3/1

    3/1

    0

    000

    0013/1

    31

    3331

    Q

    QQ

    e =

    +−≡

    =

    τµ νφνφνφλ

    λρ

    Pion source can only probe Q31

  • Compare oscillation with neutrino decays (H, M�L)

    %10/ =∆ RR %10/ =∆ RR

    %10/ =∆ RR

    %20/ '' =∆ RR%10/ '' =∆ RR

    ( )( ) ( )τµ νφνφ

    νφ+

    = eR '

    OSC

    NHIH

    5.0osc' =R

    Radio wave detection

    ~50 events

  • Change the input model

    %10/ =∆ RR %20/ =∆ RR

    %10/ =∆ RR

    OSC

    IH NH

    %10/ '' =∆ RR %20/'' =∆ RR

    2NH =R

  • Change the input model

    0IH' =R

    Assume ∆R’IH=0.1

    IH

    OSC

    NH

  • Summary (I)

    • We have proposed a model-independent parameterization, the Q matrix, for flavor transition mechanisms (standard oscillations and beyond) of astrophysical neutrinos.

    • Each row of matrix Q carries a definite physical meaning. Q1i for normalization, Q2i for µ-τ symmetry breaking and Q3i governing the flux difference

    • In the µ-τ symmetry limit with flux conservation, only Q31 and Q33 are non-vanishing. They are useful for classifying neutrino flavor transition models.

    ( ) ( ) ( )2

    τµ νφνφνφ+

    −e

  • Summary (II)

    • Kilometer size neutrino telescopes such as IceCube

    and KM3NeT are suitable for detecting neutrinos

    with energies up to few tens of PeV. They are

    capable of distinguishing track and shower signals.

    The parameters Q31 and Q33 can both be probed by

    simultaneously observing pion source and muon-

    damped source. However, an astrophysical neutrino

    source is generally a mixture of the two, and the

    degree of the mixture depends on the neutrino

    energy.

  • Summary (III)

    • For Eν>1017 eV, one expects the dominance of GZK

    neutrino flux which is a pion source.

    • The Askaryan Radio Array (ARA) experiment is optimized for observing GZK neutrino flux. The discrimination of νe from νµ and ντ can help to probe the parameter Q31.

    • A 20% accurate measurement on flavor ratio is

    generally sufficient to distinguish neutrino decay models (H,M�L) from standard neutrino oscillations at the 3σ level.