Upload
denden007
View
223
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
1/25
Private-Public Partnerships
The Relevance of Budgeting
Paul L. PosnerGeorge Mason University
With Shin Kue Ryu
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
2/25
Introduction
Build on previous OECD study toexamine budgetary treatment andissues posed by ppps:
Interviews with budget officials inAustralia, Chile, France, Hungary,Korea, Portugal, United Kingdom,United States
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
3/25
Background
Worldwide Major PPP Projects Since1985 (By Region)
Europe 205 31% North America 175 27%
Asia 137 21%
Latin America 126 19%
Africa 14 2%
Total Value: $887.4 billion
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
4/25
Background
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
5/25
Background
Delivery/Finance Public Finance Private Finance
Public Delivery Direct Government User Fees
Private Delivery Contract Vouchers PPPs
Public-Private Roles and Tools
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
6/25
Background
Important features of ppps
Private financing provided up front for
Comprehensive cradle to old age design, construction, operation andmaintenance.
The private sector bears a significant
and appropriate portion of the risk. Competition and metrics essential
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
7/25
Various forms of PPPs across
nations
Different types of PPPs(Role played by private sector) Build-own-maintain (BOM)
Build-own-operate (BOO)
Build-develop-operate (BDO)
Design-construct-manage-finance (DCMF)
Design-build-operate (DBO)
Buy-build-operate (BBO)
Lease-own-operate (LOO)
Build-operate-transfer (BOT)
Build-own-operate-transfer (BOOT)
Build-rent-own-transfer (BROT)
Build-lease-operate-transfer (BLOT)
Build-transfer-operate (BTO)
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
8/25
Impetus for PPPs
Infrastructure and Capital Budgeting
Public infrastructure backlog andpotential role in economic growth.
Rationale for ppps premised on themixed incentives in budgeting forcapital
Political credit claiming
Spikes in funding and competition withother mandatory spending items
Little incentive to fund maintenance
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
9/25
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
10/25
Capital projects recorded
alternatively by government
Accrual based systems: Stretchingout budgetary recognition overtime.
Smoothe funding and overcomepotential spiking problems
Full costs of asset not required to be
funded at project inception. Both cash and accrual systems
compensate to mitigate concernsover spiking and up front costs
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
11/25
Increasing the level of public
infrastructure
Limited, and political painful, set ofoptions
Raise taxes
Levy or increase user fees
Cut spending elsewhere in the budget
Borrowing
Reduce or manage demand
PPPs perceived to offer anotherway to provide for capital
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
12/25
Budgetary Impacts of PPPs
Do PPPs provide improvedefficiency despite extra financingcosts and transaction costs?
Are PPPs affordable underintertemporal budget constraints?
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
13/25
The Efficiency Imperative
Efficiency benefits stem from Competition
Long term comprehensive contracts
Risk sharing
Reducing barriers to user charges
Results are early and mixed
Some gains in construction phase Potential offsetting losses in operations
phase
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
14/25
Public management problems
complicate the efficiency argument
Characteristic problems magnified
Goal Conflict
Principal agency problems
Limited competition
Rent seeking
Asymmetrical public sector risks
Boundary blurring undermines valueprovided by each sector
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
15/25
Fiscal Imperative
Fiscal rationale for PPPs
Permit funding of more capital projects
Free up near term fiscal space
Potential fiscal impacts Fund higher levels of capital than can
be afforded over long term
Encumber future fiscal space in
operating budgets
Promote selection of lower valueprojects
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
16/25
United Kingdom
UK Long Term Payment Projections for PFI Projects
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 2037 2040 2043 2046
Years
(MillionsofPounds)
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
17/25
Affordability considerations
Long term costs include Mandatory annual payment Capital contributions Revenue losses from foregoing user fees Contingent liabilities such as guarantees
Long term encumbrance of fiscal spacecan occur even if projects representvalue for money Crowding out other priorities Funding for nonentitlement costs will be more
constrained in the future
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
18/25
Budgeting Processes and
Practices for PPPs
1. Are PPPs on or off budget?
Critical in determining whetherprojects are governed by overall
budget constraints and guidance
Impact of Eurostat guidance
Nations vary significantly
UK experience Concessions
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
19/25
Budgeting Processes and
Practices for PPPs
2. How are ppp costs booked inbudgets?
Most nations do not recognizecosts of ppps up front
Less stringent than government capital
Several nations do book ppp costs
up front Indirect subsidies for ppps often
not budgeted for up front when
commitment is made
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
20/25
Budgeting Processes and
Practices
3. Do nations impose limits on ppps?
Some nations have imposed
budgetary limits on annual PPPKorea and Hungary
UK overall capital DEL
Most nations include annualized ppp
costs in medium term frameworks
Most nations not providing longterm budget projections
UK data on long term trajectory
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
21/25
Budgeting Processes and
Practices
4. Is legislative and public oversightcomparable with other spending?
In most nations, the annual
appropriations process will not disclosethe presence of new PPPs
Several nations do not provide forlegislative approval of ppps
Public information on contract andprivate partner difficult to obtain
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
22/25
Budgeting Process and Practices
5. What other practices have nationsadopted to provide for ppp reviews?
Robust analytic review processes PPP units
Public sector comparator
Greater rigor than government capital
Question whether analysis issufficient without budget controls
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
23/25
Conclusions
Use of private financing anddelivery for public services has itswell known advantages.
Stronger budgetary processes andcontrols are necessary to providegreater assurance that PPPs are
being funded for the right reasons.
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
24/25
Suggestions for Strengthening
Budgetary Controls
Up front funding for ppps in competitionfor limited resources
Full on budget treatment, regardless of
accounting Affordability criteria and limits
Up front estimation of guarantees
Strengthening long term budget analysis
Improved disclosures of long termobligations
8/10/2019 Private-Public Partnerships - Relevance of Budgeting
25/25
Public and Private Sectors are Alike
in All Unimportant Respects
Wallace Sayre