Private International Law Bibliography 2009-10: U.S. and Foreign

* Dean and Alex L. Parks Distinguished Professor of Law, Willamette University College of

Law.

The bibliography includes books and articles in journals (but not in books) that have been

published in 2010, or in 2009 and not included in the previous bibliography (see 58 Am.J.Comp.

L. 307 (2010)).

-1-

Private International Law Bibliography 2009-10:

U.S. and Foreign Sources in English

Compiled bySymeon C. Symeonides*

I. BOOKS

ADELM AN (M.), GHOSH S., LAND ERS (A.) &

TAKENAKA (T.), Global Issues in Patent

Law (2010).

AGRAW AL (K.), Private International Law in

India (2010).

ALEINIKOFF (T.), MARTIN (D.) & MOTOM URA

(H.), Immigration and Nationality Laws

of the United States: Selected Statutes,

Regulations and Forms (2010).

AM ERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE, The Interna-

tional Handbook on Private Enforcement

of Competition Law (2010).

BANKAS (E.), The State Immunity Controversy

in International Law: Private Suits

Against Sovereign States in Domestic

Courts (2010).

BARIATTI (S.) (eds.), Litigating Intellectual

Property Rights Disputes Cross-Border:

EU Regulations, ALI Principles, CLIP

Project (2010).

BARKER (J.), Immunities from Jurisdiction in

International Law (2009).

BASEDOW (J.), KISCHEL (U.) & SIEBER (U.)

(eds.), German National Reports to the

18th International Congress of Compara-

tive Law (2010).

BASEDOW (J.), KONO (T.) & METZGER (A.)

(eds.), Intellectual Property in the Global

Arena: Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, and

the Recognition of Judgments in Europe,

Japan and the US (2010).

BELL (J.), Judiciaries Within Europe: A Com-

parative Review (2010).

BIEHLER (G.), Procedures in International Law

(2010).

BINDER (P.), International Commercial Arbi-

tration and Conciliation in Uncitral Model

Law Jurisdiction (2009).

BINDER (C.), KRIEBAUM (U.), REINISCH (A.), &

W ITTICH (S.) (eds.), International Invest-

ment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in

Honour of Christoph Schreuer (2009).

BLACK (V.), Foreign Currency Claims in the

Conflict of Laws (2010).

BOELE-WOELKI (K.),Unifying and Harmoniz-

ing Substantive Law and the Role of Con-

flict of Laws (2010).

B O E L E - W O E L K I ( K . ) , E I N H O R N , ( T . ) ,

GIRSBERGER (D.) & SYM EONIDES (S.) (eds.),

Convergence and Divergence in Private

International Law: Liber Amicorum Kurt

Siehr (2010).

BROW ER (A.), Libel Tourism and Foreign Libel

Lawsuits (2011).

CARR (I.), International Trade Law (4th ed.

2010).

CHOW (D.) & SCHOENBAUM (T.), International

Business Transactions (2d ed. 2010).

COLLINS (M.), The Law of Defamation and the

Internet (3rd ed. 2011).

COOK (T.) & GARCIA (A.), International Intel-

lectual Property Arbitration (2010).

CROSS (J.), LANDERS (A.), M IRELES (M.) & YU

(P.), Global Issues in Intellectual Property

Law (2010).

CURRIE (D.), KAY (H.), KRAM ER (L.), & ROOSE-

VELT (K.), Conflict of Laws, Cases, Com-

ments, Questions (8th ed. 2010).

DANOV (M.), Jurisdiction and Judgments in

Relation to EU Competition Law Claims

(2011).

DAVIES (M.), BELL (A.) & BERETON (P.), Nygh’s

SYM EONIDES, PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW BIBLIOGRAPHY, 2009-10

-2-

Conflict of Laws in Australia (2010).

DUNOFF (J.), RATNER (S.) & W IPPM AN (D.),

International Law: Norms, Actors, Pro-

cess: A Problem-Oriented Approach (3rd

ed. 2010).

DURHAM (W .C.) & SCHARFFS (B.), Law and

Religion: National, International, and

Comparative Law Perspectives (2009).

ELLINGER (E.) & NEO (D.), The Law and Prac-

tice of Documentary Letters of Credit

(2010).

ENGLE (E.), The Alien Torts Statute: Extrater-

ritorial Jurisdiction in U.S. and Interna-

tional Law (2010).

EPSTEIN (D.) & BALDW IN (C.), International

Litigation (4th rev. ed. 2010).

E U R O P E A N P A R L I A M E N T , D I R E C T O R -

ATE-GENERAL FOR RESEARCH , The Impact

of Private International Law on E-Com-

merce: Problems Raised by Introducing

the Country of Destination Principle

(2010).

FAURE (M.) & VAN DER W ALT (A.), Globaliza-

tion and Private Law: The Way Forward

(2010).

FAW CETT (J.) & TORREM ANS,(P.), Intellectual

Property and Private International Law

(2d ed. 2011).

FELIX (R), MOZINGO (J.) & W HITTEN (R),

American Conflicts Law: Cases and Mate-

rials (5th ed. (2010).

FOLSOM (R.), GORDON (M.), SPA NO GLE (J.) &

FITZGERALD (P.), International Business

Transactions: Foreign Investment (2009).

FOLSOM (R.), GORDON (M.), SPANOGLE (J.) &


Transactions: A Problem -O riented

Coursebook (10th ed. 2009)

FOLSOM (R.), GORDON (M.), SPANOGLE (J.) &


Transactions: Trade and Economic Rela-

tions (2009).

FOLSOM (R), GORDON (M.), SPANOGLE (J.) &


Transactions: Contracting Across Borders

(2009).

FOURNIER (P.), Muslim Marriage in Western

Courts: Lost in Transplantation (2010).

FRANEY (E.), Immunity, Individuals and Inter-

national Law: Which Individuals Are

Immune from the Jurisdiction of National

Courts under International Law (2011).

GARB (L.) & W OOD (J.) (eds.), International

Succession (3rd ed. 2010).

GOLDSTEIN(P.) & HUGENHOLTZAUL (P.), Inter-

national Copyright: Principles, Law and

Practice (2010).

GOODW IN-GILL (G.) & LAM BERT (H.), The

Limits of Transnational Law: Refugee

Law, Policy Harmonization and Judicial

Dialogue in the European Union (2010).

GUAJARDO (M.), The Amparo, an Impediment

to Enforce an Arbitral Award: An Analysis

Related to the Possible Conflict of Law

Between the New York Convention and

the Mexican Legal System (2009).

GUZM AN (A.) (eds.), Cooperation, Comity,

and Competition Policy (2010).

GUZM AN (A.) & PAUW ELYN (J.), International

Trade Law (2009).

HAFETZ (J.), Habeas Corpus after 9/11: Con-

fronting America’s New Global Detention

System (2011).

HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE INTERNA-

TIONAL LAW , Proceedings of the Twentieth

Session; vol. III Choice of Court (2010).

HAGUE CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE INTERNA-

TIONAL LAW , Guide to Good Practice:

Enforcement under the Hague Convention

of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of

International Child Abduction (2010).

HAY (P.) LAJOS VÉK ÁS (L.), ELKANA (Y.) &

DIM ITRIJEVIC (N.) (eds.), Resolving Inter-

national Conflicts: Liber Amicorum Tibor

Várady (2009).

HAY(P.), BORCHERS (P.) & SYM EONIDES (S.),

Conflict of Laws (5th eds. 2010).

HEARD (H.),WALKER (S.) & COOLEY (J.), Inter-

national Commercial Arbitration Advo-

cacy: A Practitioner’s Guide for American

Lawyers (2010).

HENKIN (L.), CLEVELAND (S.), HELFER (L.),

NEUM AN (G.) & ORENTLICHER (D.), Hu-

man Rights (2d ed. 2009).

H ILL (J.) & CHONG (A.), International Com-

mercial Disputes: Commercial Conflict of

Laws in English Courts (4th ed. 2010).


-3-

H INAREJOS PARGA (A.), Judicial Control in the

European Union: Reforming Jurisdiction

in the Intergovernmental Pillars (2010).

HOFFHEIM ER (M.), Conflict of Laws: Examples

& Explanations (2010).

HUERTA GO LDM AN (J.), Mexico in the WTO

and NAFTA: Litigating International

Trade Disputes (2009).

HUNTER (D.), SALZM AN (J.), & ZAELKE (D.),

International Environmental Law and

Policy (4th ed. 2010).

JACKSON (D.), TOLLEY (M.) & VOLCANSEK (M.)

(eds.), Globalizing Justice: Critical Per-

spectives on Transnational Law and the

Cross-Border Migration of Legal Norms

(2010).

KERSTIN (S.), Application of Mandatory Rules

in the Private International Law of Con-

tracts (2010).

KRONKE (H.), NACIM IENTO (P.), OTTO (D.) &

PORT (N.), Recognition and Enforcement

of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global

Commentary on the New York Convention

(2010).

LANDROVE (J.), Assignment and Arbitration:

A Comparative Study (2009).

LAVRANOS (N.), Jurisdictional Competition:

Selected Cases in International and Euro-

pean Law (2010).

LEGOM SKY (S.) & RODRIGUEZ (C.), Immigra-

tion and Refugee Law and Policy (5th ed.

2009).

LUBAN (D), O’SULLIVAN (J.), & STEW ART (D.),

International and Transnational Criminal

Law (2009).

MACEOIN (D.) & GREEN (D.), Sharia Law or

“One Law for All?” (2009).

MALLAT (C.), Iraq: Guide To Law and Policy

(2009).

MATTEI (U.), RUSKOLA(T.) & GIDI (A.),

Schlesinger´s Comparative Law: Cases-

Text-Materials (2009).

MCCAFFREY (S.) & MAIN (T.), Transnational

Litigation in Comparative Perspective:

Theory and Application (2010).

MCILW RATH (M.) & SAVAGE (J.), International

Arbitration and Mediation: A Practical

Guide (2010).

MCMAHON (B.) & SM ITH (F.C.), The Perma-

nent Court of Arbitration: Summaries of

Awards 1999-2009 (2010).

MELKONIAN (H.), Defamation, Libel Tourism

and the Speech Act of (2010): The First

Amendment Colliding with the Common

Law (2010).

M ILM AN (D.), National Corporate Law in a

Globalised Market: The UK Experience in

Perspective (2009).

M ISTELIS (L.), Concise International Arbitra-

tion (2010).

MOSS (G.), FLETCHER (I.) & ISAACS (S.) (eds.),

The EC Regulation on Insolvency Proceed-

ings: A Commentary and Annotated Guide

(2nd ed. 2009).

MÜLLER (C.), Swiss Case Law in International

Arbitration (2nd ed. 2010).

NAFZIGER (J.), PATERSON (R.) & RENTELN (A.),

Cultural Law: International, Comparative,

and Indigenous (2010).

NAQVI (Y.), Impediments to Exercising Juris-

diction over International Crimes (2010).

NICKEL (R.), Conflict of Laws and Laws of

Conflict in Europe and Beyond: Patterns

of Supranational and Transnational

Juridification (2010).

NO RROS (M.), Judicial Cooperation in Civil

Matters with Russia and Methods of

Evaluation (2010).

NOUSSIA (K.), Confidentiality in International

Commercial Arbitration: A Comparative

Analysis of the Position under English,

US, German and French Law (2010),

O’KEEFE (R.), The Protection of Cultural

Property in Armed Conflict (2010).

OSIATYÑSKI (W.), Human Rights and Their

Limits (2009).

PACKARD (A.), The Borders of Free Expression

(2009).

PAPADOPOULOS (T.), EU Law and Harmoniza-

tion of Takeovers in the Internal Market

(2010).

PAUST (J.), VAN DYKE (J.) & MALONE (L.),

International Law and Litigation in the

United States (3d ed. 2009).

PITEL (S.) & RAFFERTY (N.), Conflict of Laws

(2010)


-4-

PROCTOR (C.), The Law and Practice of Inter-

national Banking (2010).

RAFFERTY (N.), BLOM (J.) & EDINGER (E.),

Private International Law in Common

Law Canada: Cases, Text, and Materials

(2010).

RAPHAEL(T.), The Anti-Suit Injunction (2010).

REITZ (J.) & SYM EONIDES (S.) (eds.), Welcom-

ing the World: U.S. National Reports to

the XVIIIth International Congress of

Comparative Law (2010).

ROOSEVELT (K.), Conflict of Laws (2010).

SAARLOOS (K.), European Private Interna-

tional Law on Legal Parentage?: Thoughts

on a European Instrument Implementing

the Principle of Mutual Recognition in

Legal Parentage (2010).

SARAT (A.), DOUGLAS (L.) & UM PHREY (M.)

(eds.), Law and the Stranger (2010).

SCEVOLA (C.) & SNEIDEROVA (K.), Offshore

Jurisdictions Guide (2010).

SCOTT (H.), International Finance, Transac-

tions, Policy, and Regulation (17th ed.

2010).

SHÚILLEABHÁIN (M.), Cross-Border Divorce

Law: Brussels II Bis (2010).

SIGMAN (H.) & KIENINGER (E-M.), Cross-Bor-

der Security over Receivables (2009).

SOLIS (G.), The Law of Armed Conflict: Inter-

national Humanitarian Law in War

(2010).

SPILLENGER (C.), Principles of Conflict of Laws

(2010).

SPINDLER (G.) & BÖRNER (F.), E-Commerce

Law in Europe and the USA (2010).

STONE(P.), EU Private International Law (2d

eds. 2010).

SURHONE (L.), TIM PLEDON (M.) & MARSEKEN

(S.), United States Court of International

Trade: Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Inter-

national Trade, Trade Adjustment Assis-

tance, United States International Trade

Commission (2010).

TANG (Z.), Electronic Consumer Contracts in

the Conflict of Laws (2009).

VAN W OUDENBERG (N.) & LIJNZAAD (L.), Pro-

tecting Cultural Property in Armed Con-

flict (2010).

VAN LITH (H.), The Dutch Collective Settle-

ments Act and Private International Law

(2010).

VAN SCHAACK (B.) & SLYE (R.), International

Criminal Law and its Enforcement, Cases

and Materials (2d ed. 2010).

VEDASTO (A.), Laws Applicable and Internal

Conflict of Laws in Tanzania (2009).

VON ZIEGLER (A.), ZUNARELLI (S.) & SCHELIN

(J.) (eds.), The Rotterdam Rules 2008:

Commentary to the United Nations Con-

vention on Contracts for the International

Carriage of Goods Wholly or Partly by Sea

(2010).

W ANG (F.), Internet Jurisdiction and Choice

of Law: Legal Practices in the EU, US and

China (2010).

W EIGAND (F-B.) (ed.), Practitioner’s Hand-

book on International Commercial Arbi-

tration (2nd ed. 2009).

WEINTRAUB (R.), Commentary on the Conflict

of Laws (6th ed. 2010).

W EINTRAUB (R.), International Litigation and

Arbitration: Practice and Planning (6th

ed. 2011).

W EISSBRODT (D.), AOLÁIN (F.), FITZPATRICK

(J.) & NEW M AN (F), International Human

Rights: Law, Policy, and Process (4th ed.

(2009).

WEISSBRODT (D.) & DANIELSON (D.), Immigra-

tion Law and Procedure in a Nutshell (6th

ed. 2010).

W ESSELS (B.) MARKELL (B.) & KILBORNN (J.),

International Cooperation in Bankruptcy

and Insolvency Matters (2009).

W ILLIAM S (R.), Unjust Enrichment and Public

Law: A Comparative Study of England,

France and the EU (2010).

W ULFRUM (R.) & MATZ (N.), Conflicts in

International Environmental Law (2010).

II. ARTICLES

ADDIS (A.), Imagining the International

Community: The Constitutive Dimension

of Universal Jurisdiction, 31 Hum. Rts. Q.

129 (2009).

AINSCOUGH (C.), Choice of Law and Accom-

plice Liability under the Alien Tort Stat-


-5-

ute, 28 Berkeley J. Int’l L. 588 (2010).

AL-EM ADI (T.), Stabilization Clauses in Inter-

national Joint Venture Agreements, 3

Int’l Energy L. 54 (2010).

ALAM UD DIN (A.) & W EBB (P.), Expanding

Jurisdiction over War Crimes under

Article 8 of the IC Statute, 8J. Int’l Crim.

Just. 1219 (2010).

ALBA (M.), The Use of Electronic Records as

Collateral in the Rotterdam Rules: Future

Solutions for Present Needs, 14 Unif. L.

Rev. 801 (2009).

ALBORNOZ (M.), Choice of Law in Interna-

tional Contracts in Latin American Legal

Systems, 6 J. Priv. Int’l L. 23 (2010).

ALEXANDER (K.) & SOUKUP (B.), Obama’s First

Trade War: the US-Mexico Trucking

Dispute and the Implications of Strategic

Cross-Sector Retaliation on US Compli-

ance under NAFTA, 28 Berkeley J. Int’l

L.313 (2010).

ALVAREZ RUBIO (J.), Contracts for the Inter-

national Carriage of Goods: Jurisdiction

and Arbitration under the New UNCITRAL

Convention 2008, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 171

(2009).

AM BOS (K.), Prosecuting Guantanamo in

Europe: Can and Shall the Masterminds

of the ‘Torture Memos’ Be Held Crimi-

nally Responsible on the Basis of Univer-

sal Jurisdiction?, 42 Case W. Res. J. Int’l L.

405 (2009).

ANSAY (T)., The Anatomy of Turkey’s New

Private International Law Regime, 74

RabelsZ 393 (2010).

APOSTOLOVA (E.), The Relationship Between

the Alien Tort Statute and the Torture

Victim Protection Act, 28 Berkeley J. Int’l

L.640 (2010).

ARONS (T.), ‘All Roads Lead to Rome’: Be-

ware of the Consequences! The Law

Applicable to Prospectus Liability Claims

under the Rome II Regulation, 2008

Nederl. IPR. 481 (2008).

ARVIND (T.), The ‘Transplant Effect’ in Har-

monization, 59 Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 65

(2010).

BACKER (L.), Sovereign Investing in Times of

Crisis: Global Regulation of Sovereign

Wealth Funds, State-Owned Enterprises,

and the Chinese Experience, 19 Transn’l

L. & Contemp. Probs. 3 (2010).

BAILEY (M.), Developments in Private Inter-

national Law, 48 Sup. Ct. L. Rev. 267

(2009).

BALLARD (M.), Post-Conflict Property Resti-

tution: Flawed Legal and Theoretical

Foundations, 28 Berkeley J. Int’l L. 462

(2010).

BÄLZ (M.), Japan’s Accession to the CISG, 73

RabelsZ 683 (2009).

BANTEKAS (I.), The Proper Law of the Arbi-

tration Clause: A Challenge to the Pre-

vailing Orthodoxy, 27 J. Int’l Arbitr. 1

(2010).

BARIATTI (S.), The Law Applicable to Security

Interests in Intellectual Property Rights,

6 J. Priv. Int’l L. 395 (2010).

BASEDOW (J.), Multiculturalism, Globaliza-

tion and the Law of the Open Society, 62

Rev. Hellénique Dr. Int’l 715 (2009).

BASED O W (J.), Rome II at Sea - General As-

pects of Maritime Torts, 74 RabelsZ 118

(2010).

BASEDOW (J.), Theory of Choice of Law, 75

RabelsZ 32 (2011).

BASHAYREH (M.), Lex Mercatoria and Arbi-

tration Agreements: Perspectives from

Greek and Jordanian Law, 62 Rev.

Hellénique Dr. Int'l 157 (2009).

BAST (C.), Conflict of Law and Surreptitious

Taping of Telephone Conversations, 54

N.Y. L. Sch. L. Rev. 147 (2009).

BAZINAS (S.), The Uncitral Legislative Guide

on Secured Transactions - Key Objectives

and Fundamental Policies, 42 U.C.C. L. J.

123 (2010).

BAZYLER (M.) & GERBER (S.) Litigating the

Pillage of Cultural Property in American

Courts: Chabad v. Russian Federation and

Lessons Learned, 32 Loy. L.A. Int’l &

Comp. L. Rev. 45 (2010).

BEALE (N.) & NIEUVW ELD (L.), Summary

Arbitration Proceedings: A Comparison

Between the English and Dutch Regimes,

26 Arb. Int’l 139 (2010).

BEAUM ONT (P.), Hague Choice of Court

Agreements Convention 2005: Back-


-6-

ground, Negotiations, Analysis and Cur-

rent Status, 5 J. Priv. Int’l L. 125 (2009).

BEAUM ONT (P.) & JOHNSTON (E.), Abolition of

the Exequatur in Brussels I: Is a Public

Policy Defence Necessary for the Protec-

tion of Human Rights? 2010(2) IPrax 105

(2010).

BEAUM ONT (P.) & JOHNSTON (E.), Can

Exequatur Be Abolished in Brussels I

Whilst Retaining a Public Policy De-

fence?, 6 J. Priv. Int’l L. 249 (2010).

BEAUMONT (P.), Reflections on the Relevance

of Public International Law to Private

International Law Treaty Making, 340

Recueil des Cours 9 (2010).

BEDERMAN (D.), Law of the Land, Law of the

Sea: The Lost Link Between Customary

International Law and the General Mari-

time Law, 51 Va. J. Int’l L. 299 (2011).

BELL (A.), Dispute Resolution and Applicable

Law Clauses in International Sports Arbi-

tration, 84 Austl. L. J. 116 (2010).

BERCH (J.) The Need for Enforcement of U.S.

Punitive Damages Awards by the Euro-

pean Union, 19 Minn. J. Int’l L. 55 (2010).

BERG (N.), Bringing it All Back Home: The

Fifth and Second Circuits Allow Domes-

tic Prosecutions for Oil Record Book

Violations on Foreign-Flagged Vessels, 34

Tul. Mar. L. J. 253 (2009).

BERGER (K.), The International Arbitrator's

Dilemma: Transnational Procedure Ver-

sus Home Jurisdiction, 25 Arbitr. Int'l 217

(2009).

BERLINGIERI (F.), Freedom of Contract under

the Rotterdam Rules, 14 Unif. L. Rev. 831

(2009).

B IERMAN (B.) & STRUYCKEN (T.), Rome I on

Contracts Concluded Within Multilateral

Systems, 2009 Nederl. IPR. 416 (2009).

BLOM QUIST (R.), The Jurisprudence of Amer-

ican National Security Presiprudence, 44

Valp. U. L. Rev. 881 (2010).

BODDICKER (J.), Whose Dictionary Controls?

Recent Challenges to the Term ‘Invest-

ment’ in ICSID Arbitration, 25 Am. U.

Int’l L. Rev. 1031 (2010).

BOELE-WOELKI (K.), Unifying and Harmoniz-

ing Substantive Law and the Role of

Conflict of Laws, 340 Recueil des Cours

271 (2010).

BOGDAN (M.), Private International Law

Aspects of the Introduction of Same-Sex

Marriages in Sweden, 78 Nordic J. Int’l L.

253 (2009).

BOGDAN (M.), The Rome I Regulation on the

Law Applicable to Contractual Obliga-

tions and the Choice of Law by the Par-

ties, 2009 Nederl. IPR. 407 (2009).

BOGDAN (M.), The New EC Rules on Sum-

mary Proceedings in Civil and Commer-

cial Matters, 61 Rev. Hellénique Dr. Int’l

55 (2008).

BOHOSLAVSKY (J.) & OPGENHAFFEN (V.), The

Past and Present of Corporate Complic-

ity: Financing the Argentinean Dictator-

ship. 23 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 157 (2010).

BOISE (C.), & MORRISS (A.), Change, Depend-

ency, and Regime Plasticity in Offshore

Financial Intermediation: The Saga of the

Netherlands Antilles, 45 Tex. Int’l Law J.

377 (2009).

BONELL (J.) & PELEGGI (R.), UNIDROIT Princi-

ples of International Commercial Con-

tracts and Draft Common Frame of Ref-

erence: A Synoptical Table, 14 Unif. L.

Rev. 437 (2009).

BONOM I (A.), Testamentary Freedom or

Forced Heirship? Balancing Party Auton-

omy and the Protection of Family Mem-

bers, 2010 Nederl. Int’l Priv. 605 (2010).

BORCHERS (P.), Punitive Damages, Forum

Shopping, and the Conflict of Laws, 70

La. L. Rev.529 (2010).

BORG-BARTHET (J.), New Approach to the

Governing Law of Companies in the EU:

A Legislative Proposal, 6 J. Priv. Int’l L.

589 (2010).

BORG-BARTHET (J.), European Private Inter-

national Law of Companies after

Cartesio, 58 Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 1020

(2009).

BOUTIN (G.), Forum non Conveniens and Lis

Alibi Pendens in International Litigation

in Panama, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 497 (2009).

BRIDGE (M.), The Proprietary Aspects of

Assignment and Choice of Law, 125 L. Q.

Rev. 671 (2009).


-7-

BRILMAYER (L.) & ANGLIN (R.), Choice of Law

Theory and the Metaphysics of the Stand

-Alone Trigger, 95 Iowa L. Rev. 1125

(2010).

BRO W N (A.), The Hague Adoption Conven-

tion in Comparison to Chinese and Rus-

sian Adoption Laws, 2009 Int’l L. 1337

(2009).

BROW NLEE (L.), Extraterritorial Jurisdiction

in the United States: American Attitudes

and Practices in the Prosecution of

Charles ‘Chuckie’ Taylor Jr., 9 Wash. U.

Glob. Stud. L. Rev. 331 (2010).

BROW NSTEIN (B.), Recognizing Civil RICO in

Foreign Courts: Since They Came, Should

We Build It?, 35 Brook. J. Int’l L. 233

(2010).

BRUCE (S.) & W ALKER (E.), Double Dutch:

The Relevance of Hague Conventions to

Marital Contracts and Maintenance, 2010

Fam. Law. 381 (2010).

BRUCE (T.), A Choice of Public Law? Resolv-

ing the International Arbitrator’s Di-

lemma, 20 Am. Rev. Int’l Arbitr. 97

(2009).

BUXBAUM (H.), Personal Jurisdiction over

Foreign Directors in Cross-Border Securi-

ties Litigation, 35 Corp. Law 71 (2009).

BUXBAUM (H.), National Jurisdiction and

Global Business Networks, 17 Ind. J. Glob.

Leg. Stud. 165 (2010).

BUXBAUM (R.) & CARON (D.), The Alien Tort

Statute: An Overview of the Current

Issues, 28 Berkeley J. Int’l L. 511 (2010).

BUXBAUM (R.), Is There a Place for a Euro-

pean Delaware in the Corporate Conflict

of Laws?, 74 RabelsZ 1 (2010).

CALLIESS (G-P.) & MERTENS (J.), Private Law

and Competition Policy in the Gobal

Economy, 74 RabelsZ 463 (2010).

CARILLO (A.) & PALMER (J.), Transnational

Mass Claim Processes (TMCPS) in Inter-

national Law and Practice, 28 Berkeley J.

Int’l L. 343 (2010).

CARON (D.) & HARHAY (L.), A Call to Action:

Turning the Golden State into a Golden

Opportunity for International Arbitra-

tion, 28 Berkeley J. Int’l L. 497 (2010).

CHANG (D.), Piracy Laws and the Effective

Prosecution of Pirates, 33 B. Coll. Int’l &

Comp. L. Rev. 273 (2010).

CHEHTMAN (A.), The Extraterritorial Scope of

the Right to Punish, 29 L. & Phil. 127

(2010).

CHENG (E.), Scientific Evidence as Foreign

Law, 75 Brook. L. Rev. 1095 (2010).

CHI (M.), Application of the UNIDROIT Prin-

ciples in China: Successes, Shortcomings

and Implications, 15 Unif. L. Rev. 5 (2010).

CHOI (S.) & SILBERM AN (L.), Transnational

Litigation and Global Securities Class-

Action Lawsuits, 2009 Wis. L. Rev. 465

(2009).

CLEVELAND (S.), Embedded International

Law and the Constitution Abroad, 110

Col. L. Rev. 225 (2010).

CLIFT (J.), International Insolvency Law: The

UNCITRAL Experience with Harmonisa-

tion and Modernisation Techniques, 11

Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 405 (2009).

COHEN (I.), Protecting Patients with Pass-

ports: Medical Tourism and the Patient-

Protective Argument, 95 Iowa L. Rev.

1467 (2010).

COHEN (M.), The Analogy Between Piracy

and Human Trafficking: A Theoretical

Framework for the Application of Uni-

versal Jurisdiction, 16 Buff. Hum. Rts. L.

Rev. 201 (2010).

COLANGELO (A.), The Foreign Commerce

Clause, 96 Va. L. Rev. 949 (2010).

COLEM AN (K.), W HITE (R.) & BAUDOT (A.),

Current Developments in Cross-Border

Insolvency Law: The Contours of Discre-

tionary Relief under Chapter 15 of the

U.S. Bankruptcy Code, 26 Bank. & Fin. L.

Rev. 23 (2010).

CORTEZ (N.), Recalibrating the Legal Risks of

Cross-Border Health Care, 10 Yale J.

Health Pol’y (L.) & Ethics 1(2010).

CRESPI REGHIZZI (Z.), ‘Mutual Trust’ and

‘Arbitration Exception’ in the European

Judicial Area: The West Tankers Judg-

ment of the ECJ, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 427

(2009).

CUM INGS-PETERSON (D.), Out-of-State Civil

Unions in Iowa after Varnum v. Brien:

Why the State of Iowa Should Recognize


-8-

Civil Unions as Marriages, 96 Iowa L.

Rev. 297 (2010).

CUNIBERTI (G.), The Law Governing the

Modality of Arbitral Awards, 25 Arbitr.

Int’l 347 (2009).

DANOV (M.), The Brussels I Regulation:

Cross-Border Collective Redress Proceed-

ings and Judgments, 6 J. Priv. Int’l L. 359

(2010).

DARBEE (R.), Personal Jurisdiction as a De-

fense to the Enforcement of Foreign

Arbitral Awards, 41 McGeorge L. Rev. 345

(2010).

DAVEY (M.), A Pirate Looks at the Twenty-

First Century: The Legal Status of Somali

Pirates in an Age of Sovereign Seas and

Human Rights, 85 Notre Dame L. Rev.

1197 (2010).

DAVRADOS (N.), The Protection of Foreign

Investment in Greece, 63 Rev. Hellénique

Dr. Int'l 289 (2010).

DAW ES (A.), Rien Ne Va Plus? Mutual Recog-

nition and the Free Movement of Ser-

vices in the Gambling Sector after the

Santa Casa Judgment, 35 Eur. L. Rev. 236

(2010).

DE BOER (T.), The Purpose of Uniform

Choice-of-Law Rules: the Rome II Regu-

lation, 56 Neth. Int’l L. Rev. 295 (2009).

DE BOER (T.), Living Apart Together: The

Relationship Between Public and Private

International, 57 Neth. Int’l L. Rev. 183

(2010).

DE CAROLIS (D.), Some Features of the Har-

monisation of International Trade Law in

the Third Millennium, 15 Unif. L. Rev. 37

(2010).

DE DYCKER (S.), Private International Law

Disputes Before the International Court

of Justice, 1 J. Int’l Disp. Settl. 475 (2010).

DE CONNICK (J.), The Functional Method of

Comparative Law: Quo Vadis?, 74

RabelsZ 318 (2010).

DE LISLE (J.) & TRUJILLO (E.), Consumer Pro-

tection in Transnational Contexts, 58

Am. J. Comp. L. 135 (2010 Supp.).

DE LOND RAS (F.) & KINGSTON (S.), Rights,

Security, and Conflicting International

Obligations: Exploring Inter-Jurisdic-

tional Judicial Dialogues in Europe, 58

Am. J. Comp. L. 359 (2010).

DEM ARSIN (B.), The Third Time Is Not Al-

ways a Charm: The Troublesome Legacy

of a Dutch Art Dealer–The Limitation

and Act of State Defenses in Looted Art

Cases, 28 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 255

(2010).

DEM PSEY (P.) & JOHANSSON (S.), Montreal v.

Brussels: The Conflict of Laws on the

Issue of Delay in International Air Car-

riage, 35 Air & Space L. 207 (2010).

D H O O G E ( L . ) & A G U I N D A ( V . ) ,

ChevronTexaco: Mandatory Grounds for

the Non-Recognition of Foreign Judg-

ments for Environmental Injury in the

United States, 19 J. Transn’l L. & Pol’y 1

(2009).

DICKINSO N (A.), State Immunity and State-

Owned Enterprises, 11 Bus. L. Int’l 97

(2010).

DICKINSON (A.), Provisional Measures in the

“Brussels I” Review: Disturbing the Status

Quo?, 6 J. Priv. Int’l L. 519 (2010).

DICKINSON (A.), Restrained No More? Ser-

vice out of the Jurisdiction in the 21st

Century, 2010 (1) Lloyd’s Marit. & Comm.

L. Q. 1 (2010).

DICKINSON (L.), Military Lawyers, Private

Contractors, and the Problem of Interna-

tional Law Compliance, 42 N.Y.U. J. Int’l

L. & Pol’y 355 (2010).

DILLER (P.), Habeas and (Non-)Delegation,

77 U. Chi. L. Rev. 585 (2010).

DINW OODIE (G.), Developing a Private Inter-

national Intellectual Property Law: The

Demise of Territoriality?, 51 Wm. & M. L.

Rev. 711 (2009).

DIZON (M.), The Symbiotic Relationship

Between Global Contracts and the Inter-

national IP Regime, 4 J. Intell. Prop. L. &

Pract. 559 (2009).

D’OLIVEIRA (H.), The Nonelection Rule and

Procedural Treatment of Foreign Law:

Some Observations, 61 Rev. Hellénique

Dr. Int’l 499 (2008).

DOOREY (D.), In Defense of Transnational

Domestic Labor Regulation, 43 Vand. J.

Transn’l L. 953 (2010).


-9-

DRUZIN (B.), Buying Commercial Law:

Choice of Law, Choice of Forum, and

Network Externalities, 18 Tul. J. Int’l &

Comp. L. 131 (2009).

DUBINSKY (P.), International Law in the

Legal System of the United States, 58

Am. J. Comp. L. 455 (2010 Supp.).

DUBNER (B.) & GREENE (K.), On the Creation

of a New Legal Regime to Try Sea Pirates,

41 J. Mari. L. & Comm . 439 (2010).

DUTTA (A.), The Death of the Shareholder in

the Conflict of Laws, 73 RabelsZ 727

(2009).

EDINGER (E.), The Problem of Parallel Ac-

tions: The Softer Alternative, 60 U. N. Br.

L. J. 116 (2010).

EDM ONDS (A.), No More Free Passes: Yousuf

v. Samantar and the Foreign Sovereign

Immunities Act, 88 N.C. L. Rev. 1448

(2010).

ED SA LL (C.), Implementing the Hague Con-

vention on Choice of Court Agreements

in the United States: An Opportunity to

Clarify Recognition and Enforcement

Practice, 120 Yale L. J. 397 (2010).

EID (T.) & DOYLE (C.) Separate but Unequal:

The Federal Criminal Justice System in

Indian Country, 81 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1067

(2010).

EINHORN (T.), American Private Interna-

tional Law, 74 RabelsZ 895 (2010).

EISENBERG (T.) & M ILLER (G.), The Flight to

New York: An Empirical Study of Choice

of Law of Forum Clauses in Publicly-Held

‘Companies’ Contracts, 30 Cardozo L.

Rev. 1475 (2009).

ENDICOTT (A.), The Judicial Answer? Treat-

ment of the Political Question Doctrine

in Alien Tort Claims, 28 Berkeley J. Int’l L.

537 (2010).

ERK (N.), The Cross-Border Transfer of Seat

in European Company Law: A Delibera-

tion about the Status Quo and the Fate of

the Real Seat Doctrine, 2010 Eur. Bus. L.

Rev. 413 (2010).

ERPYLEVA (N.) & GETM AN-PAVLOVA (I.), Im-

proving Russian Legislation on Private

International Law, 2009 Russ. L. Theory

& Pract. 204 (2009).

ESTIN (A.), Families Across Borders: The

Hague Children’s Conventions and the

Case for International Family Law in the

United States, 62 Fla. L. Rev. 47 (2010).

EW ALD (W.), The Complexity of Sources of

Transnational Law: United States Report,

58 Am. J. Comp. L. 59 (2010 Supp.).

FAIRGRIEVE (D.) & HOW ELLS (G.), Collective

Redress Procedures—European Debates,

58 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 379 (2009).

FEI (L.), Public Policy as a Bar to Enforce-

ment of International Arbitral Awards: A

Review of the Chinese Approach, 26 Arb.

Int’l 301 (2010).

FELDM AN (M.), Putting the Brakes on Libel

Tourism: Examining the Effects Test as a

Basis for Personal Jurisdiction under New

York’s Libel Terrorism Protection Act, 31

Cardozo L. Rev. 2457 (2010).

FENTIM AN (R.),Trading Debts Across Bor-

ders: A European Solution?, 17 Ind. J.

Glob. Leg. Stud. 245 (2010).

FERNÁNDEZ ARROYO (D.), Private Interna-

tional Law and Comparative Law: A

Relationship Challenged by International

and Supranational Law, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l

L. 31 (2009).

FERNÁNDEZ ARROYO (D.), Current Ap-

proaches Towards Harmonization of

Consumer Private International Law in

the Americas, 58 Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 411

(2009).

FESSAS (A.), Regulation of Same-Sex Mar-

riage, 63 Rev. Hellénique Dr. Int'l 53

(2010).

FICHERA (M.), The European Arrest Warrant

and the Sovereign State: A Marriage of

Convenience?, 15 Eur. L. J. 70 (2009).

FIDELL (E.), Justice Stevens, Habeas Jurisdic-

tion, and the War on Terror, 43 U.C.

Davis L. Rev. 945 (2010).

FINKELM AN (P.), When International Law

Was a Domestic Problem, 44 Valp. U. L.

Rev. 779 (2010).

FIORINI (A.), Harmonizing the Law Applica-

ble to Divorce and Legal Separation:

Enhanced Cooperation as the Way For-

ward?, 59 Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 1143 (2010).

FISHER (G.), Anti-Suit Injunctions to Restrain


-10-

Foreign Proceedings in Breach of an

Arbitration Agreement, 22 Bond L. Rev. 1

(2010).

FLETCHER (M.), Resisting Federal Courts on

Tribal Jurisdiction, 81 U. Colo. L. Rev. 973

(2010).

FLEUREN (J.), The Application of Public Inter-

national Law by Dutch Courts, 57 Neth.

Int’l L. Rev. 245 (2010).

FLOREY (K.), State Extraterritorial Powers

Reconsidered: A Reply, 85 Notre Dame L.

Rev. 1157 (2010).

FLOREY (K.), Indian Country’s Borders:

Territoriality, Immunity, and the Con-

struction of Tribal Sovereignty, 51 B. Coll.

L. Rev. 595 (2010).

FORSYTH (C.), Certainty Versus Uniformity:

Renvoi in the Context of Movable Prop-

erty, 6 J. Priv. Int’l L. 637 (2010).

FORTUNET (E.), Arbitrability of Intellectual

Property Disputes in France, 26 Arb. Int’l

281 (2010).

FÖTSCHL (A.), The Common Optional Matri-

monial Property Regime of Germany and

France – Epoch-Making in the Unifica-

tion of Law, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 395

(2009).

FOURNIER (P.), Flirting with God in Western

Secular Courts: Mahr in the W est, 2010

Int’l J. L. Pol’y & Fam . 67 (2010).

FRESNEDO DE AGUIRRE (C.), The Rotterdam

Rules from the Perspective of a Country

That Is a Consumer of Shipping Services,

14 Unif. L. Rev. 869 (2009).

FRIGO (M.), Ethical Rules and Codes of

Honor Related to Museum Activities: a

Complementary Support to the Private

International Law Approach Concerning

the Circulation of Cultural Property,2009

Int'l J. Cult. Prop. 49 (2009).

FRITCH (C.), Drug Smuggling on the High

Seas: Using International Legal Principles

to Establish Jurisdiction over the Illicit

Narcotics Trade and the Ninth Circuit’s

Unnecessary Nexus Requirement, 8

Wash. U. Glob. Stud. L. Rev. 701 (2009).

GARNETT (R.), The Hague Choice of Court

Convention: Magnum Opus or Much

Ado About Nothing?, 5 J. Priv. Int’l L. 161

(2009)

GASKELL (N.), The Bunker Pollution Conven-

tion 2001 and Limitations of Liability,

2009 J. Int’l Mar. L. 477 (2009).

GEORGE (J.), MARSHALL (S.) & CARROLL (W.),

Conflict of Laws, 63 SMU L. Rev. 455

(2010).

GEORGE (J.), Enforcing Judgments Across

State and National Boundaries: Inbound

Foreign Judgments and Outbound Texas

Judgments, 50 S. Tex. L. Rev. 399 (2009).

GEORGOPOULOS (T.), Can Tax Authorities

Scrutinise the Ideas of Foreign Charities?

The ECJ’s Persche Judgment and Lessons

from US Tax Law, 16 Eur. L. J. 458 (2010).

GERNER-BEUERLE (C.) & SCHILLIG (M.), The

Mysteries of Freedom of Establishment

after Cartesio, 59 Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 303

(2010).

GOLDBERG (C.), In Theory, in Practice: Judg-

ing State Jurisdiction in Indian Country,

81 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1027 (2010).

GORDON (R.), Vacatur of Foreign Judgments:

Options for Collateral Relief in Courts of

Registration, 15 Suffolk J. Trial & App.

Adv. 131 (2010).

GOULDING (P.) & VINALL (M.), The English

Approach to Jurisdiction and Choice of

Law in Employment Covenants Not to

Compete, 31 Comp. Lab. L. & Pol’y 375

(2010).

GRAMM ATICAKI-ALEXIOU (A.), Multicultural-

ism: Does it Affect Contemporary Inter-

nationa l Transactions?, 62 R e v .

Hellénique Dr. Int’l 553 (2009).

GRANNE (M.), Two-Dimensional Federalism

and Foreign Affairs Preemption, 44 Valp.

U. L. Rev. 863 (2010).

GRAY (A.), Reform of Rules of Private Inter-

national Law in Manitoba: A Compara-

tive Perspective, 2(4) J. Pol. & L., 26

(2009).

GRAZIANO (T.), The Rome II Regulation and

the Hague Conventions on Traffic Acci-

dents and Product Liability – Interaction,

Conflicts and Future Perspectives, 2008

Nederl. IPR. 425 (2008).

GRUBER (U.) & BACH (I.), The Application of

Foreign Law: A Progress Report on a New


-11-

European Project, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 157

(2009).

GUARINO (A.), Chasing Ghosts: Pursuing

Retroactive Justice for Franco-era Crimes

Against Humanity, 33 B. Coll. Int’l &

Comp. L. Rev. 61 (2010).

GUILFOYLE (D.), Counter-Piracy Law En-

forcement and Human Rights, 59 Int’l &

Comp. L. Q. 141 (2010).

GUPTA (A.) & SAO . D., Harmonization of

International Legal Structure for Foster-

ing Professional Services: Lessons from

Early U.S. Federal-State Relations, 18

Cardozo J. Int’l & Comp. L. 239 (2010).

HARRIS (J.), Opting out of Admiralty Law?

Uniformity vs. Freedom of Contract in

the Selection of State Choice of Law, 34

Tul. Mar. L. J. 167 (2009).

HARTLEY (T.), Jurisdiction in Conflict of

Laws: Disclosure, Third-party Debt and

Freezing Orders, 126 L. Q. Rev. 194 (2010).

HARTLEY (T.), ‘Libel Tourism’ and Conflict of

Laws, 59 Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 25 (2010).

HARTLEY (T.), Cyprus Land Rights: Conflict

of Laws Meets International Politics, 58

Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 1013 (2009).

HARTLEY (T.), Multinational Corporations

and the Third World: A Conflict-of-Laws

Analysis, 62 Rev. Hellénique Dr. Int’l 657

(2009).

HARVEY (K.), The Rights of Divorced Lesbi-

ans: Interstate Recognition of Child Cus-

tody Judgments in the Context of Same-

Sex Divorce, 78 Fordham L. Rev. 1379

(2009).

HAY (P.), Recognition of a Recognition Judg-

ment Within the European Union, 2009

Eu. Leg. For. 61 (2009).

HE (Q.), Recent Developments with Regards

to Choice of Law in Tort in China, 11 Ybk

Priv. Int’l L. 211 (2009).

HEINZE (C.), Industrial Action in the Conflict

of Laws, 73 RabelsZ 770 (2009).

HEINZE (C.), Insurance Contracts under the

Rome I Regulation, 2009 Nederl. Int’l

Priv. 445 (2009).

HEISER (W.), The Hague Convention on

Choice of Court Agreements: The Impact

on Forum non Conveniens, Transfer of

Venue, Removal, and Recognition of

Judgments in United States Courts, 31 U.

Pa. Int’l Law. 1013 (2010).

HESS (B.), Cross-Border Collective Litigation

and the Regulation Brussels I, 2010(2)

IPrax 116 (2010).

H ILL (D.), The Hague Convention on the

International Protection of Adults, 58

Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 469 (2009).

H ILL (J.), Article 6 of the Rome I Regulation:

Much Ado About Nothing, 2009 Nederl.

IPR. 437 (2009).

HOFM ANN (N.), Interpretation Rules and

Good Faith as Obstacles to the UK’s

Ratification of the CISG and to the Har-

monization of Contract Law in Europe,

22 Pace Int’l L. Rev. 145 (2010).

HOFFM EISTER (F.) & ONDRUSEK (P.), The

European Community in International

Litigation, 61 Rev. Hellénique Dr. Int’l 205

(2008).

HOGG (P.) & MCKEE (S.), Are National Class

Actions Constitutional?, 2010 26 N.J.C.L.

279 (2010).

HOVENKAM P (H.), The Federal Trade Com-

mission and the Sherman Act, 62 Fla. L.

Rev. 871 (2010).

HUANG (J.), Interregional Recognition and

Enforcement of Civil and Commercial

Judgments: Lessons for China from US

and EU Laws, 6 J. Priv. Int’l L. 109 (2010).

HUGHES (D.), The Insolubility of Renvoi and

its Consequences, 6 J. Priv. Int’l L. 195

(2010).

INFANTINO (M.), Making European Tort Law:

the Game and its Players, 18 Cardozo J.

Int’l & Comp. L. 45 (2010).

ISANGA (J.), Countering Persistent Contem-

porary Sea Piracy: Expanding Jurisdic-

tional Regimes, 59 Am. U. L. Rev. 1267

(2010).

ISHIKAW A (T.), Third Party Participation in

Investment Treaty Arbitration, 59 Int’l &

Comp. L. Q. 373 (2010).

JABAREEN (H.), Transnational Lawyering and

Legal Resistance in National Courts:

Palestinian Cases Before the Israeli Su-

preme Court, 13 Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. L.

J. 239 (2010).


-12-

JACOBS (J.), The Reach of State Corporate

Law Beyond State Borders: Reflections

upon Federalism, 84 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1149

(2009).

JAEGER (K.), Environmental Claims under the

Alien Tort Statute, 28 Berkeley J. Int’l L.

519 (2010).

JALLOH (C.), Universal Jurisdiction, Univer-

sal Prescription? A Preliminary Assess-

ment of the African Union Perspective

on Universal Jurisdiction, 21 Crim. L. For.

1 (2010).

JANGER (E.), Virtual Territoriality, 48 Col. J.

Transn’l L. 401 (2010).

JAYM E (E.), Party Autonomy in International

Family and Succession Law: New Ten-

dencies, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 1 (2009).

JENKS (C.), A Sense of Duty: The Illusory

Criminal Jurisdiction of the U.S. /Iraq

Status of Forces Agreement, 11 San Diego

Int’l L. J. 411 (2010).

JOERGES (C.), Sozialstaatlichkeit in Europe? A

Conflict of Laws Approach to the Law of

the EU and the Proceduralisation of

Constitutionalisation, 10 Germ. L. J. 335

(2009).

JOHNSON (M.) & JOHNSON (M.), “Is the Family

a Federal Question?,” 66 Wash. & Lee L.

Rev. 131 (2009).

JONES (K.), Federalism and Concurrent Juris-

diction in Global Markets: Why a Combi-

nation of National and State Antitrust

Enforcement Is a Model for Effective

Economic Regulation, 30 N.W. J. Int’l L.

& Bus. 285 (2010).

JONES (J.), Forum and Venue Selection

Clauses in Seamen’s Employment Con-

tracts: Can Contractual Stipulations Be

Used to Defeat a Seaman’s Choice of

Forum or Venue in a Jones Act Claim?,

85 Tul. L. Rev. 519 (2010).

JOSLIN (C.), Interstate Recognition of Parent-

age in a Time of Disharmony: Same-Sex

Parent Families and Beyond. 70 Ohio St.

L. J. 563 (2009).

KAHAN (M.) & ROCK (E.), How to Prevent

Hard Cases from Making Bad Law: Bear

Stearns, Delaware, and the Strategic Use

of Comity, 58 Emory L. J. 713 (2009).

KAHN (J.), Zoya’s Standing Problem, Or,

When Should the Constitution Follow

the Flag?, 108 Mich. L. Rev. 673 (2010).

KAM ENOVA (T.), Different Legal Cultures and

Global Judicialization at the End of the

20th and the Beginning of the 21st Cen-

tury, 62 Rev. Hellénique Dr. Int'l 617

(2009).

KAM INSKY (C.), The Rome II Regulation: A

Comparative Perspective on Federalizing

Choice of Law, 85 Tul. L. Rev. 55 (2010).

KANTARIA (S.), The Challenges of Enforcing

an Arbitral Award Against a Foreign

State in the United States, 27 J. Int’l

Arbitr. 75 (2010).

KARTON (J.), Contract Law in International

Commercial Arbitration: The Case of

Suspension of Performance, 58 Int’l &

Comp. L. Q. 863 (2009).

KARTON (J.), Party Autonomy and Choice of

Law: Is International Arbitration Leading

the Way or Marching to the Beat of its

Own Drummer?, 60 U. N. Br. L. J. 32

(2010).

KAYE (T.), The Regulation of Corporate Tax

Shelters in the United States, 58 Am. J.

Comp. L. 585 (2010 Supp.).

K E E N (M .) & H E L L E R S T E I N ( W .) ,

Interjurisdictional Issues in the Design of

a VAT, 63 Tax L. Rev. 359 (2010).

KESSEDJIAN.(C), Uniformity v. Diversity in

Law in a Global W orld: The Example of

Commercial and Procedural Law, 61 Rev.


KEYES (M.), Substance and Procedure in

Multistate Tort Litigation, 18 Torts L. J.

201 (2010).

KIDANE (W.), The Status of Private Military

Contractors under International Human-

itarian Law, 38 Denv. J. Int’l L. & Pol’y 361

(2010).

KIOUPIS (D.), Cybercrime Legislation in

Greece, 63 Rev. Hellénique Dr. Int'l 511

(2010).

KIRBY (M.), Children Caught in Conflict –

The Child Abduction Convention in

Australia, 2010 Int’l J. L. Pol’y & Fam. 95

(2010).

KIRSCH (M.), The Role of Physical Presence


-13-

in the Taxation of Cross-Border Personal

Services, 51 B. Coll. L. Rev. 993 (2010).

KLEINER (C.), Money in Private International

Law: What Are the Problems? What Are

the Solutions?, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 565

(2009).

KLEINHEISTERKAM P (J.), Internationally Man-

datory Rules and Arbitration: A Practical

Attempt, 73 RabelsZ 818 (2009).

KN O X (J.), A Presumption Against

Extrajurisdictionality, 104 Am. J. Int’l Law

351 (2010).

KOBAYASHI (B.) & RIBSTEIN (L.), The Non-

Uniformity of Uniform Laws, 35 J. Corp.

L. 327 (2010).

KONTOROVICH (E.) & ART (S.), An Empirical

Examination of Universal Jurisdiction for

Piracy, 104 Am. J. Int’l L. 436 (2010).

KONTOROVICH (E.), “A Guantánamo on the

Sea”: The Difficulty of Prosecuting Pi-

rates and Terrorists, 98 Cal. L. Rev. 243

(2010).

KOTRUSZ (J.), Gap-Filling of the CISG by the

UNIDROIT Principles of International

Commercial Contracts, 2009 Rev. Dr.

Unif. 119 (2009).

KRAKOFF (S.), Tribal Civil Judicial Jurisdic-

tion over Nonmembers: A Practical

Guide for Judges, 81 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1187

(2010).

KRAM ER (X.), The Rome II Regulation on the

Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obli-

gations: The European Private Interna-

tional Law Tradition Continued. Intro-

ductory Observations, Scope, System,

and General Rules, 2008 Nederl. IPR. 414

(2008).

KREUZER (K.), Clash of Civilizations and

Conflict of Laws, 62 Rev. Hellénique Dr.

Int’l 629 (2009).

KRISHNAMURTHI (G.), The Choice of Rules

Clause: A Solution to the Choice of Law

Problem in Ethics Proceedings, 88 Tex. L.

Rev. 855 (2010).

KRONKE (H.), From International to Trans-

national Commercial Law: The Impact of

Diversities of Cultures, 62 Rev. Hellénique

Dr. Int’l 705 (2009).

KRUGER (T.), Civil Jurisdiction and the Issue

of Legislating, 6 Eu J. Priv. Int’l L. 499

(2010).

KUIPERS (J.), Party Autonomy in the Brussels

I Regulation and Rome I Regulation and

the European Court of Justice, 10 German

L. J. 1055 (2009).

KUIPERS (J.), Cartesio and Grunkin Paul:

Mutual Recognition as a Vested Rights

Theory Based on Party Autonomy in

Private Law, 2 Eur. J. Leg. Stud. 66 (2009).

KUNER (C.), Data Protection Law and Inter-

national Jurisdiction on the Internet

(Part 2), 18 Int’l J. Law & Inf. Tech. 227

(2010).

KURTZ (J.), Adjudging the Exceptional at

International Investment Law: Security,

Public Order and Financial Crisis, 59 Int’l

& Comp. L. Q. 325 (2010).

KURZYNSKY-SINGER (E.), Recognition of For-

eign Judgments by Russian Courts, 74

RabelsZ 493 (2010).

KYRIAKAKIS (J.), Corporate Criminal Liability

and the ICC Statute: The Comparative

Law Challenge, 56 Neth. Int’l L. Rev. 333

(2009).

LA BELLE (M.), Patent Litigation, Personal

Jurisdiction, and the Public Good, 18 Geo.

Mason L. Rev. 43 (2010).

LANDOVA (M.), Public Policy Exception to

Recognition and Enforcement of Judg-

ments in Cases of Copyright Infringe-

ment, 40 Int'l Rev. Intell. Prop. & Compet.

L. 642 (2009).

LEANDRO (A.), Effet Utile of the Regulation

No. 1346 and Vis Attractiva Concursus.

Some Remarks on the Deko Marty Judg-

ment, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 469 (2009).

LEIBNER (J.), An Executory Approach to

Cross-Border Insolvencies, 64 U. Miami

L. Rev. 1171 (2010).

LEIN (E.), Further Step Towards a European

Code of Private International Law: The

Commission Proposal for a Regulation on

Succession, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 107 (2009).

LESTER (G.) & RYAN (E.), Choice of Law and

Employee Restrictive Covenants: An

American Perspective, 31 Comp. Lab. L. &

Pol’y J. 389 (2010).

LEVIN (H.), Resolving Interstate Conflicts


-14-

over Same-Sex Non-Marriage, 63 Fla. L.

Rev. 47 (2011).

LII (M.), An Empirical Examination of the

Adequate Alternative Forum in the Doc-

trine of Forum non Conveniens, 8 Rich. J.

Glob. L. & Bus. 513 (2009).

LINCOLN (R.), To Proceed with Caution?

Aiding and Abetting Liability under the

Alien Tort Statute, 28 Berkeley J. Int’l L.

604 (2010).

LIU (R.), Recent Judicial Cooperation in Civil

and Commercial Matters Between Main-

land China and Taiwan, the Hong Kong

S.A.R. and the Macao S.A.R., 11 Ybk Priv.

Int’l L. 235 (2009).

LUO (G.), Crime of Law-Bending Arbitration

in Chinese Criminal Law and its Effects

on International Commercial Arbitration,

11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 283 (2009).

LY (F.) & FRIEDM AN (M.) & RADICATI DI

BROZOLO (L.), Introduction to the ILA

International Commercial Arbitration

Committee’s Report and Recommenda-

tions on “Ascertaining the Contents of

the Applicable Law in International

Commercial Arbitration,” 26 Arb. Int’l 191

(2010).

MAHNHOLD (T.), Choice of Law Provisions in

Contractual Covenants Not to Compete:

The German Approach, 31 Comp. Lab. L.

& Pol’y J. 331 (2010).

MAIER (B.), How Has the Law Attempted to

Tackle the Borderless Nature of the

Internet?, 18 Int’l J. L. & Inf. Tech. 142

(2010).

MAIN (T.), The Procedural Foundation of

Substantive Law, 87 Wash. U. L. Rev. 801

(2010).

MAKRIDOU (K.), Cost and Fee Allocation in

Civil Procedure, 63 Rev. Hellénique Dr.

Int'l 113 (2010).

MANCHAK (B.), Comprehensive Economic

Sanctions, the Right to Development,

and Constitutionally Impermissible Vio-

lations of Int’l Law, 30 B.C. Third World

L. J. 417 (2010).

MANGAN (J.), The Need for Cross-Border

Clarity: Recognizing American Class

Action Judgments in Canada, 35 Adv. Q.

375 (2009).

MARONGIU BUONAIUTI (F.), Lis Alibi Pendens

and Related Actions in Civil and Com-

mercial Matters Within the European

Judicial Area, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 511

(2009).

MARTIN (D.) & PRACCHIA (D.), Company

Mobility Through Cross-Border Transfers

of Registered Offices Within the Euro-

pean Union – A New Challenge for

French Law, 2010 Clunet 327 (2010).

MATTHEQS (J.) & STEW ART (K.), Time to Eval-

uate the Standards for Issuance of In-

terim Measures of Protection in Interna-

tional Investment Arbitration, 2009 Arb.

Int’l 529 (2009).

MAULTZSCH (F.), Choice of Law and Ius

Cogens in Conflict of Laws for Contrac-

tual Obligations, 75 RabelsZ 60 (2011).

MAXEINER (J.), Cost and Fee Allocation in

Civil Procedure, 58 Am. J. Comp. L. 195

(2010 Supp.).

MCBETH (I.), Prosecute the Cheerleader,

Save the World?: Asserting Federal Juris-

diction over Child Pornography Crimes

Committed Through “Sexting,” 44 U.

Rich. L. Rev. 1327 (2010).

MCELEAVY (P.) & PERREAU-SAUSSINE (L.),

Private International Law, 59 Int’l &

Comp. L. Q. 505 (2010).

MCFARLAND (R.), Please Do Not Publish this

Article in England: A Jurisdictional Re-

sponse to Libel Tourism, 79 Miss. Law J.

617 (2010).

MEIDANIS (H.), The Brussels I Regulation

and the Cyprus Problem Before the Court

of Justice: Comment on Apostolides v.

Orams, 34 Eur. L. Rev. 963 (2009).

MEIDANIS (H.), Sale and Purchase of Vessels

Before Greek Courts: How Safe Is the

Choice of Foreign Law Made by the Par-

ties?, 61 Rev. Hellénique Dr. Int’l 455

(2008).

MENEGA TTI (E.), The Choice of Law in Em-

ployment Contracts: Covenants Not to

Compete under the Italian Legislation, 31

Comp. Lab. L. & Pol’y J. 799 (2010).

MEURLING (E.), Less Surprises for Spouses

Moving Within the Nordic Countries?


-15-

Amendments to the 1931 Nordic Conven-

tion on Marriage, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 385

(2009).

MEVORACH (I.), Jurisdiction in Insolvency: A

Study of European Courts’ Decisions, 6 J.

Priv. Int’l L. 327 (2010).

MEYER (J.), Dual Illegality and Geoambiuous

Law: A New Rule for Extraterritorial

Application of U.S. Law, 95 Minn. L. Rev.

110 (2010).

M ICHAELS (R.), Explanation and Interpreta-

tion in Functionalist Comparative Law –

A Response to Julie De Conick, 74

RabelsZ 351 (2010).

M ICHAELS (R.), Rethinking the UNIDROIT

Principles: From a Law to Be Chosen by

the Parties Towards a General Part of

Transnational Contract Law, 73 RabelsZ

866 (2009).

M ICHAELS (R.), After the Revolution – De-

cline and Return of U.S. Conflict of Laws,

11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 11 (2009).

M ILLER (O.), Murder or Authorized Combat

Action: Who Decides? W hy Civilian

Court is the Improper Forum to Prose-

cute Former Military Service Members

Accused of Combat Crimes, 56 Loy. L.

Rev. 447 (2010).

M INOW (M.), & SINGER (J.), In Favor of Foxes:

Pluralism as Fact and Aid to the Pursuit

of Justice, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 903 (2010).

M ITCHELL (A.) & HEATON (D.), The Inherent

Jurisdiction of WTO Tribunals: The

Select Application of Public International

Law Required by the Judicial Function, 31

Mich. J. Int’l L. 559 (2010).

MOEDRITZER (M.), W HITTAKER (K.) & YE (A.),

Judgments ‘Made in China’ but Enforce-

able in the United States? 45 Int’l Law.

817 (2010).

MOHTASHAM I (R.) & TANNOUS (S.), Arbitra-

tion at the Dubai International Financial

Centre: A Common Law Jurisdiction in

the Middle East, 25 Arbitr. Int'l 173

(2009).

MONESTIER (T.), Personal Jurisdiction over

Non-Resident Class Members: Have We

Gone down the Wrong Road?, 45 Tex.

Int’l Law J. 537 (2010).

MONTEIRO (F.), Internet Sales and Conflicts,

2010 New Zealand L. J. 49 (2010).

MORRIS (R.), Conflicts of Limitation Laws in

the United States and the United King-

dom: Solving the Riddle of Norwalk Vic-

tory, 34 Tul. Mar. L. J. 303 (2009).

MORRISO N (F.), The Protection of Foreign

Investment in the United States of Amer-

ica, 58 Am. J. Comp. L. 437 (2010 Supp.).

MORTENSEN (R.), The Hague and the Ditch:

The Trans-Tasman Judicial Area and the

Choice of Court Convention, 5 J. Priv.

Int’l L. 213 (2009).

MO URER (S.), Gateway to Justice: Constitu-

tional Claims to Actual Innocence, 64 U.

Miami L. Rev. 1279 (2010).

MUCCIARELLI (F.), Cross-border Tender Of-

fers, the Exclusion of Certain Sharehold-

ers and the Principle of Equal Treatment,

2009 Rev. Dr. Unif. 165 (2009).

MUIR W ATT (H.), Brussels I and Aggregate

Litigation or the Case for Redesigning

the Common Judicial Area in Order to

Respond to Changing Dynamics, Func-

tions and Structures in Contemporary

Adjudication and Litigation, 2010(2)

IPrax 111 (2010).

MULLIGAN (L.), Did the Madisonian Compro-

mise Survive Detention at Guantánamo?,

85 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 535 (2010).

MUÑOZ-LÓPEZ (J.), Internet Conflict of Laws:

A Space of Opportunities for ODR, 14

Rev. Colomb. Der. Int’l 163 (2009).

MUSIN (V.), The Influence of the Interna-

tional Sale of Goods Convention on Do-

mestic Law Including Conflict of Laws

(With Specific Reference to Russian

Law), 342 Recueil des Cours 9 (2010).

NAFZIGER (J.), The Louisiana and Oregon

Codifications of Choice-of-Law Rules in

Context, 58 Am. J. Comp. L. 165 (2010

Supp.).

NAGY (C.),The Rome II Regulation and Traf-

fic Accidents: Uniform Conflict Rules

with Some Room for Forum Shopping -

How So?, 6 J. Priv. Int’l L. 93 (2010).

NAJAR (J.), Inside Out: A User’s Perspective

on Challenges in International Arbitra-

tion, 2009 Arb. Int’l 515 (2009).


-16-

NASCIM BENE (B.), Jurisdiction and Applicable

Law in Matrimonial Matters: Rome III

Regulation? 2009 Eur. Leg. For. 1 (2009).

NELSON (T.), Down in Flames: Three U.S.

Courts Decline Recognition to Judgments

from Mexico, Citing Corruption, 44 Int’l

Lawyer 897 (2010).

NOREN (D.), Tax Havens and Tax Policy:

How Should the U.S. Tax System Treat

Income Earned by Multinationals in Low

-Tax Jurisdictions?, 88 Taxes 27 (2010).

O’CONNOR (G.), When in Rome: An Exami-

nation of Article 4 of the Rome Regime

on the Governing Law of International

Contracts, 9 Hibernian L. J. 39 (2010).

OKUDA , Y., Initial Ownership of Copyright in

a Cinematographic Work under Japanese

Private International Law, 11 Ybk Priv.

Int’l L. 375 (2009).

ONYEM A (E.), Enforcement of Arbitral

Awards in Sub-Sahara Africa, 26 Arb. Int’l

115 (2010).

OPERTTI BADÁN (D.) & FRESNEDO DE AGUIRRE

(C.), The Latest Trends in Latin Ameri-

can Private International Law: The Uru-

guayan 2009 General Law on Private

International Law, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 305

(2009).

OPPONG (R.), Private International Law

Scholarship in Africa (1884-2009): A

Selected Bibliography, 58 Am. J. Comp. L.

319 (2010).

ORTIZ (R.), What Changes in International

Transport Law after the Rotterdam

Rules?, 14 Unif. L. Rev. 893 (2009).

PAGE (A.), Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the

Scottish Legal System: The End of the

Anomaly?, 14 Edinburgh L. Rev. 269

(2010).

PAINTER-THORNE (S.), If You Build It, They

Will Come: Preserving Tribal Sovereignty

in the Face of Indian Casinos and the

New Premium on Tribal Membership, 14

Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 311 (2010).

PAPASSIOPI-PASSIA (Z.), Consumer Protection

in Greek Private International Law, 63

Rev. Hellénique Dr. Int'l 79 (2010).

PAPASTAVRIDIS (E.), Enforcement Jurisdiction

in the Mediterranean Sea: Illicit Activi-

ties and the Rule of Law on the High

Seas, 25 Int’l J. Marine & Coastal L. 569

(2010).

PAPAVIZAS (C.) & MORRISSEY (G.), Does the

Jones Act Apply to Offshore Alternative

Energy Projects?, 34 Tul. Mar. L. J. 377

(2010).

PARRISH (A.), Comity and Parallel Foreign

Proceedings: A Reply to Black and Swan.

Lloyd’s Underwriters v. Cominco Ltd., 47

Can. Bus. L. J. 209 (2009).

PARRISH (A.), Duplicative Foreign Litigation,

78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 237 (2010).

PAUKNEROVÁ (M.), Law Applicable to Obliga-

tions in the European Union: Some

Questions on the Borderline (Procedural

and Unilateral Undertakings), 61 Rev.


PÉREZ-CORREA (F.), Enforcement and Recog-

nition of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral

Awards in México, 77 Def. Couns. J. 384

(2010).

PERRAKI (M.), Patent Infringement and Pri-

vate International Law Issues in Greece,

62 Rev. Hellénique Dr. Int'l 413 (2009).

PERREAU-SAUSSINE (L.), Forum Conveniens

and Anti-Suit Injunctions Before French

Courts: Recent Developments, 59 Int’l &

Comp. L. Q. 519 (2010).

PETSCHE (M.), International Commercial

Arbitration and the Transformation of

the Conflict of Laws Theory, 18 J. Int’l L.

453 (2010).

PIGMAN (H.) & CALHOUN (M.), Unsettling the

Settled: Is There a Re-Emerging Debate

Regarding the Role of Choice-of-Law in

Class Certification Proceedings?, 77 Def.

Couns. J. 465 (2010).

PITEL (S.), Reformulating a Real and Sub-

stantial Connection, 60 U. N. Br. L. J. 177

(2010).

PITEL (S.), Choice of Law for Unjust Enrich-

ment: Rome II and the Common Law,

2008 Nederl. IPR. 456 (2008).

POLKOW SKA (M.), Some Observations on

Civil Air Carrier Liability in International

Air Carriage: “Accident,” “Damage” and

Jurisdiction, 15 Unif. L. Rev. 109 (2010).

PORTNOY (A.) ET. AL., The Foreign Sovereign


-17-

Immunities Act: 2008 Year in Review, 16

L. & Bus. Rev. Am. 179 (2010).

POTESTÀ (M.), State Immunity and Jus

Cogens Violations: The Alien Tort Stat-

ute Against the Backdrop of the Latest

Developments in the Law of Nations, 28

Berkeley J. Int’l L. 571 (2010).

PYTYNIA (C.), Forgive Me, Founding Fathers

for I Have Sinned: A Reconciliation of

Foreign Affairs Preemption after Medellin

v. Texas, 43 Vand. J. Transn’l L. 1413

(2010).

RADICATI DI BROZOLO (L.), Choice of Court

and Arbitration Agreements and the

Review of the Brussels I Regulation,

2010(2) IPrax 121 (2010).

RAINER (D.), The Impact of West Tankers on

Parties’ Choice of a Seat of Arbitration,

95 Cornell L. Rev. 431 (2010).

RAUTRAY (D.), India’s Supreme Court Places

New Hurdles on Enforcement of Foreign

Awards: Venture Global and the Cases

Leading up to It, 64 Disp. Resol. J. 80

(2009).

REICHMAN (J.), Rethinking the Role of Clini-

cal Trial Data in International Intellec-

tual Property Law: The Case for a Public

Goods Approach, 2009 Marq. Intel. Prop.

Rev. 1 (2009).

RENDLEM AN (D.), Collecting a Libel Tourist’s

Defamation Judgment?, 67 Wash. & Lee

L. Rev. 467 (2010).

REQUEJO ISIDRO (M.), Punitive Damages from

a Private International Law Perspective,

25 Tort & Ins. L. 237 (2009).

RESNICOFF (B.), The Importance of Interstate

Jurisdictional Issues in Family Law Mat-

ters, 24 Am. J. Fam. L. 78 (2010).

REUVENI (E.), Extraterritoriality as Standing:

A Standing Theory of the Extraterritorial

Application of the Securities Laws, 43

U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1071 (2010).

REYHAN (P.), Conflict of Laws, 60 Syr. L. Rev.

769 (2010).

RITCHIE (J.), A Tie That Binds: Forum Selec-

tion Clause Enforceability in West Vir-

ginia, 113 W. Va. L. Rev.95 (2010).

ROBERTSON (C.), Transnational Litigation

and Institutional Choice, 51 B. Coll. L.

Rev. 1081 (2010).

ROBINSON (T.) & BRADRICK (E.), Judgment

Enforcement in the United States

Against Sovereign States: Some Interest-

ing Procedural Questions, 4 Disp. Resol.

Int’l 151 (2010).

RONEN, Y., ICC Jurisdiction over Acts Com-

mitted in the Gaza Strip: Article 12(3) of

the ICC Statute and Non-State Entities,

8J. Int’l Crim. Just. 3 (2010).

ROSEN (M.), State Extraterritorial Powers

Reconsidered, 85 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1133

(2010).

ROSENKRANZ (T.) & ROHDE (E.), The Law

Applicable to Non-Contractual Obliga-

tions Arising out of Acts of Unfair Com-

petition and Acts Restricting Free Com-

petition under Article 6 Rome II Regula-

tion, 2008 Nederl. IPR. 435 (2008).

ROSM AN (M.), Challenges to State Anti-Pref-

erence Laws and the Role of Federal

Courts, 18 Wm. & M . Bill of Rts. J. 709

(2010).

ROSSOLILLO (G.), Personal Identity at a

Crossroads Between Private International

Law, International Protection of Human

Rights and EU Law, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 143

(2009).

ROTEM (Y.), The Problem of Selective or

Sporadic Recognition: A New Economic

Rationale for the Law of Foreign Country

Judgments, 10 Chi. J. Int’l L. 505 (2010).

ROTHROCK (A.), Temporal and Substantive

Choice of Law under the Colorado Rules

of Professional Conduct, 39 Colo. Law. 35

(2010).

ROZAKIS (C), The Law of State Immunity

Revisited: The Case Law of the European

Court of Human Rights, 61 Rev.


RUHL (G.), The Problem of International

Transactions: Conflict of Laws Revisited,

6 J. Priv. Int’l L. 59 (2010).

RYAN (E.), Federalism at the Cathedral:

Property Rules, Liability Rules, and In-

alienability Rules in Tenth Amendment

Infrastructure, 81 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1 (2010).

RYNGAERT (C.), Territorial Jurisdiction over

Cross-Frontier Offences: Revisiting a


-18-

Classic Problem of International Crimi-

nal Law, 9 Int'l Crim. L. Rev. 187 (2009).

S A B E L ( C . ) & G E R S T E N B E R G , O . ,

Constitutionalising an Overlapping Con-

sensus: the ECJ and the Emergence of a

Coordinate Constitutional Order, 16 Eur.

L. J. 511 (2010).

SALCIDO (R.), Law Applicable on the Outer

Continental Shelf and in the Exclusive

Economic Zone, 58 Am. J. Comp. L.407

(2010 Supp.).

SAM UELS (J.), How Piracy has Shaped the

Relationship Between American Law and

International Law, 59 Am. U. L. Rev. 1231

(2010).

SAM UELS (J.), When Is an Alternative Forum

Available? Rethinking the Forum non

Conveniens Analysis, 85 Ind. L. J. 1059

(2010).

SANDERS (A.), Private Autonomy and Marital

Property Agreements, 59 Int’l & Comp. L.

Q. 571 (2010).

SANDERS (A.), New Frontiers in the ATS:

Conspiracy and Joint Criminal Enterprise

Liability after Sosa, 28 Berkeley J. Int’l L.

619 (2010).

SANTOM AURO (P.), Sense and Sensibility:

Reviewing West Tankers and Dealing

with its Implications in the Wake of the

Reform of EC Regulation 44/2001, 6 J.

Priv. Int’l L. 281 (2010).

SAUM IER (G.), Competing Class Actions

Across Canada: Still at the Starting Gate

after Canada Post v. Lépine?, 48 Can. Bus.

L. J. 462 (2010).

SCHAF (M.), International Law in Crisis: A

Qualitative Empirical Contribution in the

Compliance Debate, 31 Cardozo L. Rev. 45

(2009).

SCHERPE (J.) & DUTTA (A.), Cross-Border

Enforcement of English Ancillary Relief

Orders, Fog in the Channel – Europe Cut

Off?, 2010 Fam. L. 385 (2010).

SCHILL (S.), Most-Favored-Nation Clauses as

a Basis of Jurisdiction in Investment

Treaty Arbitration, 10 J. World Invest. &

Trade 189 (2009).

SCHLOSSER (P.), The Abolition of Exequatur

Proceedings – Including Public Policy

Review?, 2010(2) IPrax 101 (2010).

SCHOBEL (T.), Telos Versus Unilateralism:

Cross-Border Banking Business and the

International Applicability of Domestic

Banking Law, 63 Con. Fin. L. Q. Rep. 177

(2009).

SCHOEM AN (E.), Rome II and the Sub-

stance-procedure Dichotomy: Crossing

the Rubicon, 2010 Lloyd’s Marit. &

Comm. L. Q . 81 (2010).

SCHUPACK (A.), The Arab-Israeli Conflict and

Civil Litigation Against Terrorism, 60

Duke L. J. 207 (2010).

SCHW ARTZE (A.), A European Regime on

International Product Liability: Article 5

Rome II Regulation, 2008 Nederl. IPR.

430 (2008).

SCHW ARZ (D.), A Regression from the New

York Convention: Questions Raised by

Thomas v. Carnival Corporation, 64 U.

Miami L. Rev. 1441 (2010).

SCHW ING (A.), Comity Versus Unitary Law: A

Clash of Principles in Choice-of-Law

Analysis for Class Certification Proceed-

ings in Multidistrict Litigation, 33 Seattle

U. L. Rev. 361 (2010).

SELLERS (M.), Universal Human Rights in the

Law of the United States, 58 Am. J. Comp.

L. 533 (2010 Supp.).

SHAH (P.), Inconvenient Marriages, or What

Happens When Ethnic Minorities Marry

Trans-Jurisdictionally, 6 Utrecht L. Rev.

17 (2010).

SHANY (Y.), In Defence of Functional Inter-

pretation of Article 12(3) of the Rome

Statute, 8 J. Int’l Crim. Just. 329 (2010).

SIEHR (K.), The Rome II Regulation and

Specific Maritime Torts: Product Liabil-

ity, Environmental Damage, Industrial

Action, 74 RabelsZ 139 (2010).

SINCLAIR (A.) & STRANGER-JONES (D.), Execu-

tion of Judgments or Awards Against the

Assets of State Entities, 4 Disp. Resol.

Int’l 95 (2010).

SKINNER (G.), When Customary Interna-

tional Law Violations Arise Under the

Laws of the United States, 36 Brook. J.

Int’l L. 205 (2010).

SKINNER (G.), Customary International Law,


-19-

Federal Common Law, and Federal Court

Jurisdiction, 44 Valp. U. L. Rev. 825

(2010).

SLOANE (R.), Breaking the Genuine Link: The

Contemporary International Legal Regu-

lation of Nationality, 50 Harv. Int’l L. J. 1

(2009).

SM ITH (S.), Articles Definitely Be: The Out-

look for U.S. Relations with the Interna-

tional Criminal Court During the Obama

Administration, 22 Fla. J. Int’l L. 155

(2010).

SPAGNOLO (L.), Green Eggs and Ham: The

CISG, Path Dependence, and the Behav-

ioural Economics of Lawyers’ Choices of

Law in International Sales Contracts, 6 J.

Priv. Int’l L. 417 (2010).

SPENCER (A.), Nationwide Personal Jurisdic-

tion for Our Federal Courts, 87 Denv. U.

L. Rev. 325 (2010).

SPIGELM AN (J.), The Centrality of Jurisdic-

tional Error, 21 Public L. Rev. 77 (2010).

STEINBRÜCK (B.), Jurisdiction to Set Aside

Foreign Arbitral Awards in India: Some

Remarks on an Erroneous Rule of Law, 11

Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 481 (2009).

STEINLE (J.) & VASILIADES (E.), The Enforce-

ment of Jurisdiction Agreements under

the Brussels I Regulation: Reconsidering

the Principle of Party Autonomy, 6 J.

Priv. Int’l L. 565 (2010).

STEPHENS (P.), Applying Human Rights

Norms to Climate Change: The Elusive

Remedy, 21 Colo. J. Int’l Envir. L. & Pol’y

49 (2010).

STERIO (M.), The Somali Piracy Problem: A

Global Puzzle Necessitating a Global

Solution, 59 Am. U. L. Rev. 1449 (2010).

STEW ART (A.) & GREENE (J.), Choice of Law

and the Enforcement of Post-Employ-

ment Restraints in Australia, 31 Comp.

Lab. L. & Pol’y J. 305 (2010).

STIPANOW ICH (T.), Arbitration and Choice:

Taking Charge of the “New Litigation,” 7

DePaul Bus. & Comm. L. J. 383 (2009).

STIPANOW ICH (T.), Arbitration: The “New

Litigation,” 2010 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1 (2010).

STRONG (S.), Jurisdictional Discovery in

United States Federal Courts, 67 Wash. &

Lee L. Rev. 489 (2010).

STURLEY (M.), Jurisdiction and Arbitration

under the Rotterdam Rules, 14 Unif. L.

Rev. 945 (2009).

SYM EONIDES (S.), Party Autonomy in Rome I

and II: An Outsider’s Perspective, 2009

Nederl. IPR. 191 (2010).

SYM EONIDES (S.), Choice of Law in the Amer-

ican Courts in 2009: Twenty-Third An-

nual Survey, 58 Am. J. Comp. L. 227

(2010).

SYM EONIDES (S.), Oregon’s New Choice-of-

Law Codification for Tort Conflicts: An

Exegesis, 88 Or. L. Rev. 963 (2009).

SYM EONIDES (S.), A Dedication to Professor

P. John Kozyris, 58 Am. J. Comp. L. 221

(2010).

SYM EONIDES (S.), Private International Law

Bibliography 2008-09: U.S. and Foreign

Sources in English, 58 Am. J. Comp. L.

307 (2010).

TAKAHASHI (K.), Damages for Breach of a

Choice-of-Court Agreement: Remaining

Issues, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 73 (2009).

TALPIS (J.) & GOLDSTEIN (G.), The Influence

of Swiss Law on Quebec’s 1994 Codifica-

tion of Private International Law, 11 Ybk

Priv. Int’l L. 339 (2009).

TAN (A.), The EU Ship-Source Pollution

Directive and Coastal State Jurisdiction

over Ships, 2010 Lloyd’s Marit. & Comm.

L. Q . 469 (2010).

TANG (Z.), Private International Law in Con-

sumer Contracts: A European Perspec-

tive, 6 J. Priv. Int’l L. 225 (2010).

TAY (C.), Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in

the People’s Republic of China, 26 Int’l

Const. L. Rev. 207 (2009).

TAYLOR (D.), Libel Tourism: Protecting Au-

thors and Preserving Comity, 99 Geo. L.

J. 189 (2010).

TEBBENS (H.), The European Union and the

Athens Convention on Maritime Carriers’

Liability for Passengers in Case of Acci-

dents: An Incorporation Adventure, 61

Rev. Hellénique Dr. Int’l 653 (2008).

TELM AN (A.), Plural Vision: International

Law Seen Through the Varied Lenses of

Domestic Implementation, 44 Valp. U. L.


-20-

Rev. 759 (2010).

THOM A (I.), Culpa in Contrahendo in the

Rome II Regulation, 61 Rev. Hellénique

Dr. Int’l 669 (2008).

THORNBURG (J.), Balancing Act in Black

Robes: Extraterritorial Habeas Corpus

Jurisdiction Beyond Boumediene, 48 Duq.

L. Rev. 85 (2010).

TOTCHAROVA (P.), The 2003 UNESCO Conven-

tion for the Safeguarding of the Intangi-

ble Cultural Heritage, 62 Rev. Hellénique

Dr. Int'l 609 (2009).

TOTTEN (C.), & MATTHEW (B.), Somali Piracy:

Jurisdictional Issues, Enforcement Prob-

lems and Potential Solutions, 41 Georg. J.

Int’l L. 377 (2010).

TROOBOFF (P.), Proposed Principles for

United States Implementation of the

New Hague Convention on Choice of

Court Agreements, 42 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. &

Pol’y 237 (2009).

TU (G.), The Conflict of Laws System in

Macau, 40 Hong Kong L. J. 85 (2010).

TUM BRIDGE (J.), Mediators: Confidentiality

and Compulsion to Give Evidence –

Issues in England, 21 Int’l Comp. &

Comm. L. Rev. 144 (2010).

TUM BRIDGE (J.), Can an Arbitration Clause

Survive Encroachment from European

Law?, 21 Int’l Comp. & Comm. L. Rev. 296

(2010).

TUM BRIDGE (J.), European Anti-Suit Injunc-

tions in Favour of Arbitration: A Sea

Change?, 21 Int’l Comp. & Comm. L. Rev.

177 (2010).

TZIANOUDAKI (N.), The 2004 Moroccan Fam-

ily Code: An Innovation in Progress Is-

sues of Private International Law, 57 Ann.

Fac. Dr. Istanbul 345 (2008).

UBERTAZZI (B.), Intellectual Property and

State Immunity from Jurisdiction in the

New York Convention of 2004, 11 Ybk

Priv. Int’l L. 1 (2009).

VALDESPINO (E.), Shifting Viewpoints: The

Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement

Act, a Substantive or Jurisdictional Ap-

proach, 45 Tex. Int’l L. J. 457 (2009).

VAN DEN BERG (A.), Enforcement of Arbitral

Awards Annulled in Russia,, 27 J. Int’l

Arbitr. 179 (2010).

VAN DEN HERIK (L.), The Difficulties of Exer-

cising Extraterritorial Criminal Jurisdic-

tion: The Acquittal of a Dutch Business-

man for Crimes Committed in Liberia, 9

Int'l Crim. L. Rev. 211 (2009).

VAN ENGELEN (D.), Rome II and Intellectual

Property Rights: Choice of Law Brought

to a Standstill, 2008 Nederl. IPR. 440

(2008).

VAN LITH (H.), International Jurisdiction and

Commercial Litigation: Uniform Rules

for Contract Disputes, 2009 Nederl. Int’l

Priv. 597 (2009).

VAN LOON (H.), Legal Diversity in a Flat,

Crowded World: The Role of the Hague

Conference, 62 Rev. Hellénique Dr. Int’l

495 (2009).

VASSILAKAKIS (E.), Recent Private Interna-

tional Law Codifications, 63 Rev.

Hellénique Dr. Int'l 103 (2010).

VENEZIANO (A.), UNIDROIT Principles and

CISG: Change of Circumstances and Duty

to Renegotiate According to the Belgian

Supreme, 15 Unif. L. Rev. 137 (2010).

VERHAGEN (H.) & VAN DONGEN (S.), Cross-

Border Assignments under Rome I, 6 J.

Priv. Int’l L. 1 (2010).

VLAS (P.), IBILI (F.), ZILINSKY M. & VLEK (J.),

Civil Jurisdiction and Enforcement of

Judgments in Europe, 56 Neth. Int’l L.

Rev. 245 (2009).

VLAS (P.), On the Development of Private

International Law in the Netherlands:

From Asser’s Day to the Codification of

Dutch Private International Law, 57 Neth.

Int’l L. Rev. 167 (2010).

VOLDERS (B.), Culpa in Contrahendo in the

Conflict of Laws: A First Appraisal of

Article 12 of the Rome II Regulation, 2008

Nederl. IPR. 464 (2008).

W AD LOW (C.), The New Private Interna-

tional Law of Unfair Competition and the

‘Rome II’ Regulation, 4 J. Intell. Prop. L. &

Prac. 789 (2009).

W AGNER (V.), The Hague Conference for

Private International Law: Ten Years of

EC Competence in Regards to Judicial

Cooperation in Civil Matters, 73 RabelsZ


-21-

215 (2009).

W ALKER (L.), The Impact of the Hague Ab-

duction Convention on the Rights of the

Family in the Case-Law of the European

Court of Human Rights and the Un Hu-

man Rights Committee: The Danger of

Neulinger, 6 J. Priv. Int’l L. 649 (2010).

W ALSH (C.), The Uses and Abuses of Party

Autonomy in International Contracts, 60

U. N. Br. L. J. 12 (2010).

W ANG (J.), Securities Pirates: Why a More

Expansive Basis for Jurisdiction over

Transnational Securities Fraud Will

Prevent the United States from Turning

into the Barbary Coast, 62 Admin. L. Rev.

223 (2010).

W ARDLE (L.), Section Three of the Defense

of Marriage Act: Deciding, Democracy,

and the Constitution, 58 Drake L. Rev.

951 (2010).

W ARDLE (L.), Marriage and Religious Lib-

erty: Comparative Law Problems and

Conflict of Laws Solutions, 12 J. L. & Fam.

Stud. 315 (2010).

W ASCO (M.), When Less Is More: The Inter-

national Split over Expanded Judicial

Review in Arbitration, 62 Rutgers L. Rev.

599 (2010).

W ATKINS (L.), How States Can Protect Their

Policies in Federal Class Actions, 32

Campbell L. Rev. 285 (2010).

W AUGH (R.), Exhaustion of Remedies and

the Alien Tort Statute, 28 Berkeley J. Int’l

L. 555 (2010).

W EBSTER (T.), Efficiency in Investment Arbi-

tration, 2009 Arb. Int’l 468 (2009).

W EINSTEIN (D.), New York: The Next Mecca

for Judgment Creditors? An Analysis of

Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda Ltd., 79

Fordham L. Rev. 3161 (2010).

W EISS (J.), Tax Claims in Transnational

Insolvencies: A ‘Revenue Rule-Approach’,

30 Va. Tax Rev. 261 (2010).

W HYTOCK (C.), Domestic Courts and Global

Governance, 84 Tul. L. Rev. 67 (2009).

W ILDERSPIN (M.), The Rome II Regulation;

Some Policy Observations, 2008 Nederl.

IPR. 408 (2008).

W OLFF (L.), Hong Kong’s Conflict of Con-

tract Laws: Quo Vadis?, 6 J. Priv. Int’l L.

465 (2010).

W OODHOUSE (M.), Shop Til You Drop: Im-

plementing Federal Rules of Patent Liti-

gation Procedure to Wear out Forum

Shopping Patent Plaintiffs, 99 Geo. L. J.

227 (2010).

W ÜRDINGER (M.), The Principle of Unity in

the European Private International Law

and Procedural Law Governing Contrac-

tual and Non-Contractual Obligations: A

Methodological Examination of the Prac-

tical Concordance Between the Brussels

I, Rome I and Rome II Regulations, 75

RabelsZ 102 (2011).

XIAO (F.), Law Applicable to Arbitration

Clauses in China: Comments on the

Chinese People’s Supreme Court’s Deci-

sion in the Hengji Company Case, 11 Ybk

Priv. Int’l L. 297 (2009)

XIAO (Y.) & LONG (W.), Contractual Party

Autonomy in Chinese Private Interna-

tional Law, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 193 (2009).

XIAO (Y.) & LONG (W.), Enforcement of In-

ternational Arbitration Agreements in

Chinese Courts, 2009 Arb. Int’l 569

(2009).

XIAO (Y.), Foreign Precedents in Chinese

Courts, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L. 265 (2009).

YAMAKAW A (R.), Transnational Dimension of

Japanese Labor and Employment Laws:

New Choice of Law Rules and Determi-

nation of Geographical Reach, 31 Comp.

Lab. L. & Pol’y J. 347 (2010).

YEO (T.), Breach of Agreements on Choice of

Law, 2010 Lloyd’s Marit. & Comm. L. Q .

194 (2010).

YOKARIS (A.), International Law in Domestic

Systems, 63 Rev. Hellénique Dr. Int'l 319

(2010).

YORK-ERW IN (G.), The Choice-of-Law Prob-

lem(s) in the Class Action Context, 84

N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1793 (2009).

ZAM ZAM (A-M.), Bankruptcy Jurisdiction and

Enforcement of Foreign Bankruptcy

Judgments in Egypt, 6 J. Priv. Int’l L. 623

(2010).

ZHU (W .), Law Applicable to Arbitration

Agreements in China, 11 Ybk Priv. Int’l L.


-22-

255 (2009).

Documents

Private International Law Bibliography 2009-10: U.S. and Foreign