Upload
king
View
37
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Priority assessment of heavily polluted areas in Serbia; a practical approach. R. Dijcker 1 , M. van der Wijk 1 , B. Blem 2 , J. Ignjatovic 3 , A. Popovic 3 , R. Zanetti 1 1 Witteveen+Bos Consulting Engineers, The Netherlands 2 NIRAS A/S, Denmark - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
29 October 2011 1
Priority assessment of heavily polluted areas in Serbia; a practical approach
R. Dijcker1, M. van der Wijk1, B. Blem2, J. Ignjatovic3, A. Popovic3, R. Zanetti1
1 Witteveen+Bos Consulting Engineers, The Netherlands2 NIRAS A/S, Denmark3 Regional Environmental Centre for Central and Eastern Europe (REC)
Preparation of Action plans for Remediation of three heavily polluted areas
An EU-funded project managed by the European Agency for Reconstruction
29 October 2011 2
Outline
• Part A: A system for identification and ranking of polluted sites was developed –to prepare remediation action plans for heavily polluted sites in Serbia
• Part B:Relevance for finding practical solutions for key environmental issues, River Basin Management (RBM)
Preparation of risk based and cost-effective remediation plans
29 October 2011 3
Introduction (1)• Currently, Serbia is working on:
• improving environmental protectionand water quality
• protection of water resources• aligning its procedures with the EU
• In Serbia and its riversheds many polluted sites are present
• These site are potential threat to soil, surface water and groundwater resources
• Remediation of these polluted sites is needed
29 October 2011 4
Introduction (2)
• In Serbia national inventories are under development related to;• pollution sources• accidental risk spots • contaminated sites
• Goal: To improve the conditions for remediation of polluted sites in Serbia
• Results of this project provided an approach for the entire process from identification of potentially polluted sites to the preparation of remediation plans
5 september 2008 5
A stepwise approach
29 October 2011 6
Phase 1: Identification of sites
• Identification methods:
long-list of 386 sites
29 October 2011 7
Phase 2: Pre-assessment
• Multi criteria analyses (MCA) was applied for ranking the long-list
29 October 2011 8
Phase 3/4: Re-assessment• Site investigations of 10 pre-selected sites
• Development of additional ranking criteria (MCA)• cost level and effectiveness remediation• possibility of implementing the remediation
• Detailed environmental impact assessment (Top-3)• baseline study• site conceptual model• Tier II risk assessment
• Risk based and cost-effective remediation plans
29 October 2011 9
Part B: Tool for River Basin Management (Dutch case)
• The Dutch ‘Room for the River’ Programme recognised that insight in presence of polluted sites is needed • optimise the measures• estimate total (remedial) costs
• A quick scan was performed:• GIS-database of national inventories• expert-judgement; estimate remedial costs
• A GIS-database of polluted sites showed to be a promising tool for (spatial) planning and cost-effective execution of protection measures
29 October 2011 10
Conclusions
• A practical approach for identification and ranking of polluted sites was developed and successfully applied:• Long-list of 386 potentially polluted sites• Preparation of risk based and cost-effective
remediation plans
• The project showed that an initial assessment, based on limited input data and professional judgement, can provide within a short time frame a reliable assessment and ranking of polluted sites
29 October 2011 11
Conclusions
• The developed identification and ranking system has proven to have potential as a tool to support the decision-making process:• meet environmental goals• prepare environmental protection and
remediation plans and programmes• estimate budgets• optimise spatial planning
29 October 2011 12
Thank you for your attention!!
For further contact:R. Dijcker, Witteveen+Bos: [email protected]
M. van der Wijk, Witteveen+Bos: [email protected] J. Ignjatovic: [email protected], A. Popovic, REC: [email protected]