Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 1
Printed metal oxide materials and TFT devices Jaakko Leppäniemi D.Sc. (Tech.) / VTT
Outline
Introduction:
Printing methods
Printed oxide materials
Printing inks for metal oxides
Annealing methods
Printed metal oxide devices with focus on metal oxide TFTs:
Example 1: inkjet-printed S/D-contacts for oxide TFTs
Example 2: flexographic printed oxide layers for TFTs
Summary
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 2
Introduction
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 3
Printing methods
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 4
+ Fast customization, low cost for R&D
+ No pressure exterted to substrate
− Droplet shape & film non-uniformity
− Limited throughput
+ High-throughput possible with R2R
− Design of gravure rolls expensive
− Flexography has limited resolution
− Cup shape pattern
− Pressure on sample
+ High-resolution (< 1 µm possible)
+ Uniform film thickness
+ Vertical side walls
− Step coverage in multilayer films
− Limited throughput
Reverse offset Inkjet Roll-to-roll methods (R2R)
Printing methods: overview
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 5
Method Linewidth (µm) Overlay (µm) Layer 𝒅 control Optimal in TFTs
for
Gravure ~50 (~2)* > 30 OK SC/SD/GD
Flexography ~75 > 30 OK SC/GD
Screen ~50 ~10+ > 10 Poor -
Reverse offset < 1 < 10 Good SC/SD/GD
Inkjet ~30 ~10 OK SC/SD
SIJ & EHD ~1 ~1 Good SD
* The minimum linewidth is obtained with inverse gravure. G. Grau et al. Flex. Print. Electron 1 (2016) 023002 + The minimum linewidth is obtained with screen offset printing. K. Nomura et al. J. Micromech. Microeng. 24 (2014) 095021
“Printed and low temperature-processed indium oxide thin-film transistors for flexible applications”, J. Leppäniemi PhD thesis, Aalto University (2017)
Printed oxide materials
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 6
Conductors: ITO, ATO (Sb-doped SnOx), ACO (Al-doped CdOx) etc.
Dielectrics: AlOx, ZrOx, HfOx, YOx, doped AlOx etc.
Semiconductors: In2O3, ZnO, SnOx, IZO, ZTO, IGZO, ITZO, etc.
Source and drain
electrodes
Gate electrode
Gate dielectric
Semiconductor channel
TFT device
Printing inks for metal oxides
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 7
Nanoparticle route Sol-gel/precursor route
Printing inks for metal oxides
Colloidal dispersions of electrosterically
encapsulated oxide nanoparticles
Water or organic solvent
Removal of encapsulant by mild heating
or ionic destablizer
Results in porous films even with high
temperature sintering for higher 𝜌
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 8
Nanoparticle route
Metal oxide core (In2O3, ZnO, IGZO etc.)
Thin layer of encapsulation
Low-𝑇 or ionic destabilizer
High-𝑇 (> 500 °C) or laser
Encapsulated particle
Bare oxide particle
Coalesced or necked particles
𝜌 ~ medium
𝜌 ~ low
𝑑~10 − 100 nm
Remnant porosity
Printing inks for metal oxides
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 9
Sol-gel/precursor route
Dissolved metal salts or metal alkoxides
in aqueous or organic solvent
Ligands coordinating metal cation centers
Requires thermal (or other) energy to i)
form oxide through hydrolysis and
condensation reaction, ii) removal of
contaminants, and iii) film densification
Dense films possible (𝜌 ~ 80 % of bulk)
M+ = In3+, Ga3+, Zn2+, Sn2+/4+, Al3+, Zr2+, Hf2+ etc.
R- = Cl-, NO3-, (C5H7O2)-,
(C2H3O2)- etc.
H2O
𝜌 ~ high
𝜌 ~ medium
Low-𝑇
High-𝑇
Abundant hydroxyl groups
Porosity
Densified film through M-O-M rearrangement
General trends during annealing?
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 10
𝜌
𝑇 𝑓 𝑀
−𝑂
−𝑀
𝑇
XRR XPS 𝑓 𝑎𝑚
𝑜𝑟
𝑝.
𝑇
XRD
𝜇
𝑇
𝑛𝑒
𝑇
TFT or Hall Hall
𝐼 𝑂𝑁
/𝑂𝐹
𝐹
𝑇
TFT
Substrate CTE and glass
transition limits
annealing temperature
𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥1 ≤ 150 ℃ for
low-cost plastics
(transparent)
𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥2 ≤ 350 −
400 ℃ for speciality
plastics (opaque)
𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥1 𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥1 𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥1
𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥1 𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥1 𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥1
What limits the maximum annealing
temperature?
𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥2 𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥2 𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥2
𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥2 𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥2 𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥2
Alternative, low-temperature annealing required to reach high
performance on plastics!
Alternative annealing methods
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 11
Combustion synthesis[1]
[1] “Low-temperature fabrication of high-performance metal oxide thin-film electronics via combustion processing”, M.G. Kim et al. Nature Materials © (2011) - Reprinted by permission from Springer Nature Customer Service Centre GmbH: Springer Nature
𝑡𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 ~ 30 min
Alternative annealing methods
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 12
Combustion synthesis
UV-assisted annealing
[2] “Far-UV Annealed Inkjet-Printed In2O3 Semiconductor Layers for Thin- Film Transistors on a Flexible Polyethylene Naphthalate Substrate”, J. Leppäniemi et al ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2017)
[1] “Low-temperature crystallization of solution-derived metal oxide thin films assisted by chemical processes”, I. Bretos et al. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 (2017) - Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry.
𝑡𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 ~ 5 − 180 min
(𝑡𝑑𝑟𝑦𝑖𝑛𝑔~15 min)
Photodissociation of ink components and in situ
radicals (e.g. HO*)
Evaporation of volatile ink components and condensation reaction products and M-O-M network rearrangement & film densification
Printed In2O3 TFT on PEN plastic[2] Ref. [1]
Alternative annealing methods
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 13
Combustion synthesis
UV-assisted annealing
Microwave-assisted
annealing[1]
𝑡𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 ≥ 3 min
[1] “High-performance low-temperature solution-processable ZnO thin film transistors by microwave-assisted annealing”, T. Jun et al. J. Mater. Chem. C 21 (2011) Journal of materials chemistry by Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain) Reproduced with permission of ROYAL SOCIETY OF CHEMISTRY, in the format Presentation/Slides via Copyright Clearance Center.
Microwave energy
ZnO
Si/SiO2
Thermal energy 140 °C
Ref. [1]
Prof. J. Moon, Yonsei, Korea
Alternative annealing methods
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 14
Combustion synthesis
UV-assisted annealing
Microwave-assisted
annealing
Pulsed light annealing[1]
[1] “Sub-second photonic processing of solution-deposited single layer and heterojunction metal oxide thin-film transistors using a high-power xenon flash lamp ”, K. Tetzner et al. J. Mater. Chem. C 5 (2017) Journal of materials chemistry. C, Materials for optical and electronic devices by Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain) Reproduced with permission of Royal Society of Chemistry in the format Presentation/Slides via Copyright Clearance Center.
Xenon flash light (Novacentrix)
𝑇𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒~1000 ℃ 1 pulse 5 J/cm2
0.5 ms
𝑇𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚~300 ℃
In2O3
Glass substrate
𝑡𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 < 20 s
(𝑡𝑑𝑟𝑦𝑖𝑛𝑔~20 min)
Rapid heating & cooling
Ref. [1]
Prof. T. Anthopoulos, KAUST, SA
Alternative annealing methods
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 15
Combustion synthesis
UV-assisted annealing
Microwave-assisted
annealing
Pulsed light annealing
Laser annealing[1]
[1] “Rapid laser-induced photochemical conversion of sol–gel precursors to In2O3 layers and their application in thin-film transistors”, S. Dellis et al. J. Mater. Chem. C 5 (2017) - Published by The Royal Society of Chemistry.
𝑡𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠 < 10 s
(𝑡𝑑𝑟𝑦𝑖𝑛𝑔~15 min)
Ref. [1]
Dr. D. Koutsogeorgis, Nottingham Trent, UK
Alternative annealing methods
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 16
Overview on precursor-
derived low-temperature
annealed TFTs
Binary oxides like ZnO,
In2O3 reach lower
annealing temperatures
Recent reports on laser
annealing and pulsed light
annealing show promise as
they enable rapid low-
temperature annealing
[III]
[II]
[II]
[III] (PI)
(PEN)
(PEN)
(PES)
(PAR) (PAR)
(PEN)
(PI)
(PI)
(PI)
“Printed and low temperature-processed indium oxide thin-film transistors for flexible applications”, J. Leppäniemi PhD thesis, Aalto University (2017)
Early 2017
Printed metal oxide devices: focus on TFTs
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 17
Oxide TFTs using printing methods
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 18
[III]
[III]
[IV]
[I]
(PEN) (PEN)
(PI)
“Printed and low temperature-processed indium oxide thin-film transistors for flexible applications”, J. Leppäniemi PhD thesis, Aalto University (2017)
Overview on printed and
low-temperature annealed
oxide TFTs
In2O3 is most often used
material
Inkjet is most often used
method
Only a few reports on
readily R2R-compatible
methods (gravure, flexo
etc.)
Early 2017
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 19 [1] Reprinted with permission from “Scalable, High-Performance Printed InOx Transistors Enabled by Ultraviolet-Annealed Printed High-k AlOx Gate Dielectrics”, W. J. Scheideler et al ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2018). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
Ref. [1]
Current S-o-A of printed oxide TFTs
+ Inkjet-printing of all layers
Prof. V. Subramanian, UCLA, USA
+ All-oxide materials
− Relatively high processing temperature < 250 °C (2h)
− Rigid (Si wafer) substrate
− Large device size (W = 450 µm / L = 250 µm)
+ High-performance (µ > 10 cm2/(Vs))
Challenges with printed oxide TFTs
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 20 “Printed and low temperature-processed indium oxide thin-film transistors for flexible applications”, J. Leppäniemi PhD thesis, Aalto University (2017)
𝐶
𝑓 ~100 Hz
No Al, Ti, Mo etc. NP dispersions Ag and Au form Schottky contact Cu (CuO) requires photonic flash sintering TCO’s require high annealing temperature
Our solutions
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 21
J. Leppäniemi et al Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7168–7175 J. Leppäniemi et al ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 10, 8774-8782
Flexographic printing continuous, thin oxide semiconductor layers on plastic
Inkjet-printed In2O3 layers on PEN substrate at 150 °C enabled by far UV-assisted annealing
J. Leppäniemi et al IEEE Elec. Dev. Lett. 2016, 37, 4, 445-448
High-gain nMOS-depletion load inverters utilizing inkjet-printing for channel thickness optimization
Semiconductor
Our solutions
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 22
L. Gillan et al J. Mater. Chem. C, 2018, 6, 3220
Inkjet-printed Ag S/D-semiconductor contact engineering using n-doped interface layers
Revere-offset-printed MoOx S/D-contacts from metal-acetyleacetonate ink
Y.Kusaka et al ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 29, 24339-24343
Dr. Yasuuki Kusaka Dr. Nobuko Fukuda
S/D electrodes
Example 1: inkjet-printed S/D contacts layers for TFTs
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 23
Inkjet-printed Ag S/D-contacts
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 24
Evaporated Al works well with inkjet-printed In2O3 semiconductor: no printable inks
for Al, Ti, Mo etc.
Inkjet-printed nanoparticle Ag contacts result in poor performance and Schottky
barrier
[2] Reproduced from “High performance solution processed oxide thin-film transistors with inkjet printed Ag source–drain electrodes”, L. Gillan et al J. Mater. Chem. C (2018) with permission from the RSC.
Evaporated Al
[1] “Far-UV Annealed Inkjet-Printed In2O3 Semiconductor Layers for Thin- Film Transistors on a Flexible Polyethylene Naphthalate Substrate”, J. Leppäniemi et al ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2017)
Inkjet-printed Ag nanoparticle S/D[2] Evaporated Al S/D[1]
Inkjet-printed Ag S/D-contacts
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 25
Interface layer with high n-doping could help to reduce contact resistance between
Ag and In2O3 semiconductor
Branched PEI has large tetriary amine groups that can give out electrons[1]
[2] Reproduced from “High performance solution processed oxide thin-film transistors with inkjet printed Ag source–drain electrodes”, L. Gillan et al J. Mater. Chem. C (2018) with permission from the RSC.
TFT stack Material & method
Substrate Wafer
Gate Si p++
Dielectric 100 nm of SiO2
Semiconductor 2 layers inkjet printing In2O3
+ 300 °C annealing
Interface layer Inkjet printing In2O3 with 0.1 wt%
of PEI + 300 °C annealing
S/D electrodes Inkjet-printed Ag nanoparticles
𝑒−
[1] “Metal Oxide Transistors via Polyethylenimine Doping of the Channel Layer: Interplay of Doping, Microstructure, and Charge Transport”, W. Huang et al Adv. Func. Mater. 26 (2016)
Ref. [2]
Inkjet-printed Ag S/D-contacts
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 26
PEI-containing interface layer between inkjet-printed Ag and inkjet-printed In2O3
helps to reduce hysteresis and increase mobility
[1] Reproduced from “High performance solution processed oxide thin-film transistors with inkjet printed Ag source–drain electrodes”, L. Gillan et al J. Mater. Chem. C (2018) with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Interlayer S/D µsat cm2/
(Vs) Von (V) Vhyst (V)
No Ag 0.03
± 0.01 −0.5 ± 1.8 5.7 ± 0.7
0.1 % PEI-In2O3
Ag 3.0 ± 1.8 −5.2 ± 0.9 4.0 ± 0.7
With interface engineering, printed Ag can be used
as potential S/D contact for printed oxide TFTs
Ref. [1]
Inkjet-printed Ag contacts for oxide TFTs
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 27
Mechanisms behind the improved performance?
[1] “High performance solution processed oxide thin-film transistors with inkjet printed Ag source–drain electrodes”, L. Gillan et al J. Mater. Chem. C (2018) [2] ” A Universal Method to Produce Low–Work Function Electrodes for Organic Electronics” Y. Zhou et al. Science 336 (2012)
Interlayer 𝑹𝒔𝒉 𝜴/sq 𝑹𝒄 (Ω) Ahdesion Ag at% (3d XPS) φ (eV)** [2]
No 4.7 ± 0.4 M * 280 ± 29 k 0B, >65% removed ~2.5 at% 4.6
0.1 % PEI-In2O3 0.5 ± 0.1 k 29 ± 8 k 1B, 35 - 65% removed ~1.5 at% 3.6
Reduced contact resistance leads to improved
performance
* Bare In2O3 ** Ag / PEI-doped Ag
Example 2: flexographic-printed oxide layers for TFTs
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 28
Flexography-printed In2O3 TFTs
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 29
Flexographic printing of In2O3 ink on flexible substrate (Xenomax® PI)
Ink: In(NO3)3 2.5H2O dissolved in 2-methoxyethanol (0.2 M) without additives
TFT stack Material & method
Substrate 38 µm Xenomax® polyimide
Gate Evaporated Al or Au
Dielectric 75 / 100 nm of
ALD-grown Al2O3
Semiconductor 1-3 layers flexographic printing +
300 °C annealing
S/D electrodes Evaporated Al with
W/L ~12.5
[1] “Flexography-Printed In2O3 Semiconductor Layers for High-Mobility Thin-Film Transistors on Flexible Plastic Substrate”, J. Leppäniemi et al Advanced Materials (2015)
Flexography-printed In2O3 TFTs
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 30
3 ml/m2 4 ml/m2
500 µm 500 µm
3 ml/m2 4 ml/m2
Printing direction
Excess ink in start of the print
Excess ink throughout the print
Al gate Al gate
Smooth, uniform layer
Varied anilox transfer volume: minimized transfer volume helps to form uniform films
[1] “Flexography-Printed In2O3 Semiconductor Layers for High-Mobility Thin-Film Transistors on Flexible Plastic Substrate”, J. Leppäniemi et al Advanced Materials (2015)
Flexography-printed In2O3 TFTs
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 31
Oxygen plasma treatment for full wetting regime improves printed layer morphology
Uniform print
0.2 M In2O3 ink In2O3 ink
[1] “Flexography-Printed In2O3 Semiconductor Layers for High-Mobility Thin-Film Transistors on Flexible Plastic Substrate”, J. Leppäniemi et al Advanced Materials (2015)
Flexography-printed In2O3 TFTs
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 32
Metal gate selection (Al vs. Au) results in different roughness for the Al2O3-In2O3
interface which will affect device performance
Xenomax PI
Al2O3
Xenomax PI
Al2O3
Al Xenomax PI
Al2O3
Au
[1] “Flexography-Printed In2O3 Semiconductor Layers for High-Mobility Thin-Film Transistors on Flexible Plastic Substrate”, J. Leppäniemi et al Advanced Materials (2015)
Flexography-printed In2O3 TFTs
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 33
Varied layer amount for thickness control: multilayer printing without intermediate
drying results in uniform films
# layer d (nm)
1 7 ± 3
2 15 ± 2
3 25 ± 6
(d) With intermediate drying (b) & (c) Without intermediate drying
[1] “Flexography-Printed In2O3 Semiconductor Layers for High-Mobility Thin-Film Transistors on Flexible Plastic Substrate”, J. Leppäniemi et al Advanced Materials (2015)
Flexography-printed In2O3 TFTs
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 34
Effect of layer amount on TFT electrical performance
Increasing thickness with layer amount: Mobility increases Increasing variation in thickness leads
to increasing variation in mobility
Increasing thickness with layer amount: Turn-on voltage shifts more negative Indicates excess charge carriers
Optimize 2 layer device
[1] “Flexography-Printed In2O3 Semiconductor Layers for High-Mobility Thin-Film Transistors on Flexible Plastic Substrate”, J. Leppäniemi et al Advanced Materials (2015)
Flexography-printed In2O3 TFTs
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 35
Optimized process with 2x In2O3, 2 min O2 plasma, Au-gate (smooth interface) and
reduced dielectric thickness (75 nm)
# layer
G d (nm) Ra
(nm)
µsat cm2/ (Vs)
Von (V) SS (V/
dec)
1 Al 7 ± 3 1.2 < 0.4 0.7 ± 0.9 1.2±0.6
2 Al 15 ± 2 1.1 2 ± 1 −0.2 ± 0.4 0.8 ± 0.3
3 Al 25 ± 6 1.0 5 ± 3 −1.0 ± 0.5 0.8 ± 0.4
2 Au 𝟏𝟒 ± 𝟒 0.5 𝟖 ± 𝟒 −𝟎. 𝟔 ± 𝟎. 𝟓 𝟎. 𝟒 ± 𝟎. 𝟏
[1] “Flexography-Printed In2O3 Semiconductor Layers for High-Mobility Thin-Film Transistors on Flexible Plastic Substrate”, J. Leppäniemi et al Advanced Materials (2015)
Flexography-printed In2O3 TFTs
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 36
Reasons for high variation in device performance?
NC-In2O3
Nanocrystalline
SC mobility
heavily
dependent on 𝒅
Large variation
in mobility
Thickness
variation due to
flexo printing
Nanocrystalline semiconductor
[1] “Flexography-Printed In2O3 Semiconductor Layers for High-Mobility Thin-Film Transistors on Flexible Plastic Substrate”, J. Leppäniemi et al Advanced Materials (2015)
d = 14 ± 4 nm
Doping for amorphous layer
or improved printing process
is required for lower variation
Summary
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 37
Metal oxide precursor layers can be deposited using printing and converted to metal
oxide materials using various low-temperature annealing methods
State-of-the-art focus on printed MO TFTs developing TFT material stack and
fabrication process
Novel printing methods that can deliver linewidths that are electronics-industry
relevant (~1 µm) are needed
More work is needed to combine all-printed oxide materials, high-resolution printing
and low-temperature processing to reach circuit-level demonstrations
Thank you! Ari Alastalo, Liam Gillan, Kim Eiroma, Himadri Majumdar,
Terho Kololuoma, Olli-Heikki Huttunen
5.11.2018 VTT – beyond the obvious 38
http://www.roll-out-2020.eu http://bet-eu.eu/ ROXI-project Collaboration
Dr. Yasuuki Kusaka Dr. Nobuko Fukuda