Upload
julie-fowler
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Primary production rates under Primary production rates under varying light, temperature and varying light, temperature and
biomass conditionsbiomass conditions
Michael D. YardMichael D. YardDean W. BlinnDean W. Blinn
Northern Arizona UniversityNorthern Arizona University
Determine primary production rates for the Determine primary production rates for the phytobenthic community under a range of phytobenthic community under a range of
environmental conditionsenvironmental conditions
• Light and temperatureLight and temperature
• Determine how production Determine how production rates responded to these rates responded to these same factors under greater same factors under greater biomass accumulation.biomass accumulation.
• Develop a production model Develop a production model to estimate standing biomass to estimate standing biomass accrualaccrual
Photosynthesis is a light driven Photosynthesis is a light driven Re/dox ProcessRe/dox Process
COCO22 + H+ H22O O CHCH22O + OO + O22
hνhν
P680
P680
P700
P700H2O4
Mn Yz
Pheo
200 ps
QAQB
PQ
Cyt
ochr
ome
b 6/f
com
plex
PQ
A0
1-15ms
1 ms
150-600 μs
1 ms200 μs
O2 hνhν
hνhν
A1
FX
FA/FB
Fd
3 ps
40-200 ps
15-200 ns
2 μs
P680
P680
P700
P700H2O4
Mn Yz
Pheo
200 ps
QAQB
PQ
Cyt
ochr
ome
b 6/f
com
plex
A0
1-15ms
1 ms
150-600 μs
1 ms200 μs
Photosystem IPhotosystem I
Photosystem IIPhotosystem II
METHODOLOGYMETHODOLOGY
• Multivariate approachMultivariate approach– TemperatureTemperature
• 11, 16 & 20 C11, 16 & 20 COO
– LightLight
– Biomass (g mBiomass (g m-2 -2 ss-1-1))
• Net photosynthetic ratesNet photosynthetic rates– 30 min 30 min
• Respiration ratesRespiration rates– 30 min 30 min
• PhytobenthosPhytobenthos– Cobble substrateCobble substrate– Harvested & TranslocatedHarvested & Translocated
• Predominantly Predominantly CladophorCladophoraa• MAMBMAMB
• Acclimated to prescribed temperatureAcclimated to prescribed temperature– 48 h minimum 48 h minimum – Recirculating pumpsRecirculating pumps– Maintain temperature (±1CMaintain temperature (±1Coo))– WQ (pH, nutrients & temp)WQ (pH, nutrients & temp)
• Samples Samples – 3 to 4 cobbles per chamber 3 to 4 cobbles per chamber – 3 replicates per sample3 replicates per sample– 30 samples per temperature30 samples per temperature
• Closed system Closed system – Lexan chambers Lexan chambers (25cm x 22cm)(25cm x 22cm)
– 30 L capacity30 L capacity– O-rings sealsO-rings seals
• Internal recirculating pumpInternal recirculating pump– Inline pumps Inline pumps – Flow rate 50 L / minFlow rate 50 L / min
• Oxygen generation Oxygen generation was monitored was monitored – YSI DO sensor (3)YSI DO sensor (3)
– Data logger, YSI-Data logger, YSI-Model 52 (3)Model 52 (3)
• Digitally loggedDigitally logged– Time interval, 1 min Time interval, 1 min
• TemperatureTemperature– Internally monitoredInternally monitored
– Digitally loggedDigitally logged
• Rheostatic controlRheostatic control– Water heating elementWater heating element
– 120 V AC120 V AC
– 5500 W generator5500 W generator
• Light intensity was continuously Light intensity was continuously monitoredmonitored
• LICOR, IncLICOR, Inc– LI 1000 Data LoggerLI 1000 Data Logger
– Scalar IrradianceScalar Irradiance• PAR (400-700 nm)PAR (400-700 nm)
• μmol mμmol m-2-2 s s-1-1
– External measurementExternal measurement• Readjusted to account for the internal light Readjusted to account for the internal light
environment of the different chambers environment of the different chambers
• Light QuantityLight Quantity– Attenuation of underwater light is a Attenuation of underwater light is a
function of depth function of depth
– Quantity of light received was regulated Quantity of light received was regulated by vertical adjustmentsby vertical adjustments
• Respiration RatesRespiration Rates– Light chamber coversLight chamber covers– 30 min30 min– maintained tempmaintained temp
– monitored Omonitored O22 consumption consumption
• Volume calculationVolume calculation– Cobble displacementCobble displacement
• AFSM DeterminationAFSM Determination– DriedDried– Weighed Weighed – AshedAshed
• DO ratesDO rates– NormalizedNormalized
• mg Omg O22 g C g C-1-1 m m-2-2 h h-1-1
-1.5
-0.5
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45
TIME (Hr)
mg
O2 L
-11150 uE
600 uE
180 uE75 uE
Irradiance
Respiration (light-phase)
Net Production Rates
1427 mg O2 m-2 h-1
819 mg O2 m-2 h-1
372 mg O2 m-2 h-1
225 mg O2 m-2 h-1
Respiration (light-phase) -300 mg O2 m-2 h-1
9.77 mg O2 gC m-2 h-1
5.97 mg O2 gC m-2 h-1
3.62 mg O2 gC m-2 h-1
Net Production Rate
Respiration Rate -2.5 mg O2 gC m-2 h-1
2.12 mg O2 gC m-2 h-1
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000
QUANTA (umol m-2 s-1)
mg
O2 g
C-1
m-2
h-1
16oC
11oC
20oC
1 g AFSM
Pmax
Ek
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 500 1000 1500 2000
QUANTA (umol m -2 s -1)
mg
O2 g
C-1
m-2
h-1 16
oC
11oC
20oC
75 g AFSM
Pmax
Pk
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 500 1000 1500 2000
QUANTA (umol m-2 s-1)
mg
O2 g
C-1
m-2
h-1
150 g AFSM
16oC
11oC
20oC
Pmax
Pk
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400
TIME
mg
O2 g
C-1 m
-2 h
-1
Respiration (light-phase)
Respiration (dark-phase)
01 June 2000Lees Ferry
Direct Solar InsolationGross Photosynthesis Net Photosynthesis
NPPNPP = PG - RL - RD
Production assumption:Production assumption:
• No turnover or lossNo turnover or loss
• cellular damage leakage of cellular damage leakage of photosynthates (DOC)photosynthates (DOC)
• senescent growthsenescent growth
• physical shear forces, breakage of physical shear forces, breakage of filamentous structurefilamentous structure
• grazinggrazing
Biomass Accrual
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 20 40 60 80
DAYS (Summer Period)
g C
m-2
(A
FD
M)
16 C0
20 C0
10 C0
1.2 m Depth1.2 m DepthOptics .28Optics .28
Production assumption:Production assumption:
• No turnover or lossNo turnover or loss
• ResponseResponse– Optics remain the same, similar to Optics remain the same, similar to
Lees FerryLees Ferry
– Available light attenuates as a Available light attenuates as a function of depthfunction of depth
– Appreciable reduction in biomassAppreciable reduction in biomass
4 m Depth4 m DepthOptics .28Optics .28
Biomass Accrual
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 20 40 60 80
DAYS (Summer Period)
g C
m-2
(AF
DM
)
10 C0
20 C0
16 C0
Production assumption:Production assumption:
• No turnover or lossNo turnover or loss
• ResponseResponse– Optics are altered, similar to Optics are altered, similar to
Western Grand Canyon (Ko = 0.90)Western Grand Canyon (Ko = 0.90)
– Surface production approximating Surface production approximating 1m depth1m depth
– Comparable biomass accrual to Comparable biomass accrual to Lees Ferry at 4 m depthLees Ferry at 4 m depth
1 m Depth1 m DepthOptics .90Optics .90
Biomass Accrual
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 20 40 60 80
DAYS (Summer Period)
g C
m-2
(A
FD
M)
20 C0
10 C0
16 C0
Production assumption:Production assumption:
• No turnover or lossNo turnover or loss
• ResponseResponse– Optics are similar to Western Grand Optics are similar to Western Grand
Canyon (Ko = 0.90)Canyon (Ko = 0.90)
– Surface production approximating Surface production approximating 4m depth4m depth
– Production light limitedProduction light limited
4 m Depth4 m DepthOptics .90Optics .90
Biomass Accrual
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0 20 40 60 80
DAYS (Summer Period)
g C
m-2
(A
FD
M)
20 C0
10 C0
16 C0
• Photosynthetic carbon assimilation is Photosynthetic carbon assimilation is enzymatically controlledenzymatically controlled
– Temperature dependent processTemperature dependent process• Electron transport dependent on Electron transport dependent on
membrane fluiditymembrane fluidity
• Intermolecular collision increase ET Intermolecular collision increase ET ratesrates
– Lower TemperaturesLower Temperatures• Reduction in light absorption capacityReduction in light absorption capacity
– Reduced chlorophyll productionReduced chlorophyll production
• Increased photosynthetic capacity Increased photosynthetic capacity – Increased carboxylation activityIncreased carboxylation activity
• Allometry controls photosynthetic carbon Allometry controls photosynthetic carbon assimilationassimilation
– Per unit biomass regulates photosynthetic and Per unit biomass regulates photosynthetic and respiration ratesrespiration rates
– Explanations:Explanations:• Senescent growthSenescent growth
• Intra-spatial competition for limiting factorsIntra-spatial competition for limiting factors
– Self-shading competition for lightSelf-shading competition for light
– Impeding flow, competition for Impeding flow, competition for nutrientsnutrients
Why did an increase in temperature (20 C) result in reducing photosynthetic rates (Pmax)?
• Possible Explanations– Photorespiration response
• Rubisco
– D-ribulose-1,5-bi-phosphate carboxylate/oxygenase
• Decreased photosynthetic efficiency
– Change in epiphytic composition
• Blinn et al. (1989) identified a shift in epiphytic composition
– Thermal stress related to diel variation (48 h acclimation)
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
• Northern Arizona UniversityNorthern Arizona University– Aquatic Ecology LabAquatic Ecology Lab
• Allen Haden, Ally Martinez, Molly McCormick, Ian McKinnon, Kim Pomeroy, Joe Shannon, Kevin Wilson, & Allen Haden, Ally Martinez, Molly McCormick, Ian McKinnon, Kim Pomeroy, Joe Shannon, Kevin Wilson, & Nathan ZorichNathan Zorich
– FacultyFaculty• Michael Kearsley, George Koch, Peter Price, & Rod Parnell Michael Kearsley, George Koch, Peter Price, & Rod Parnell
– Instrumentation LabInstrumentation Lab• Charlie BrittonCharlie Britton
– Bilby CenterBilby Center• Tom Huntsberger, & Amy WeltyTom Huntsberger, & Amy Welty
• Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research CenterGrand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center• Dave Baker, Carol Fritzinger, Barry Gold, Susan Hueftle, Barbara Ralston, & Jake TiegsDave Baker, Carol Fritzinger, Barry Gold, Susan Hueftle, Barbara Ralston, & Jake Tiegs
• Mayorga’s WeldingMayorga’s Welding• Frank MayorgaFrank Mayorga
• Humphrey Summit SupportHumphrey Summit Support• Alida Dierker, Brian Dierker, Daniel Dierker & Chris MacIntoshAlida Dierker, Brian Dierker, Daniel Dierker & Chris MacIntosh
• Indispensable InsistenceIndispensable Insistence• Helen YardHelen Yard