Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Price setting behaviour in Lesotho: The role of outlet characteristics and competition
by
Mamello Nchake and Lawrence Edwards
PEDL research workshop, London, United Kingdom
Outline • Background
• Objective of the project
• Retail price data
– Results (price data)
• Survey data
– Preliminary results (survey data)
• Determinant of price setting using merged datasets
12/17/2013 2
Background • Analysis of firm pricing behaviour using micro price
data has grown rapidly in recent years as micro pricing data has become more available (Klenow and Malin, 2011).
• These studies have drawn on a variety of data sets – micro price data used to compile Consumer Price Index
(CPI) and Producer Price Index (PPI) measures,
– scanner data and firm survey data.
• Most studies, however, have focused on advanced economies. With a few exceptions, the challenge for studies on pricing behaviour in emerging economies has been the availability of price data at the micro level.
12/17/2013 3
Objective of the project
• Development of integrated retail price and outlet characteristics database for Lesotho. – Build a dataset of monthly product at the outlet
level using data from the Lesotho Bureau of Statistics (BOS)
– Conduct survey of these retail outlets
– Link the product prices database at these outlet survey database
• Use data to analyse characteristics and determinants of price-setting behavour
12/17/2013 4
183
79
56
66
49
70
83
91
50
47
12/17/2013 5
The product price dataset 1. Outlet product price data
Monthly product price data (March 2002-Dec 2009)
across the 10 districts of Lesotho
345 retailers
317 in urban centres
28 in rural areas
229 products 91 food (41 perishables, 50 non-perishables)
138 non-food (59 durables, 56 non-durables, 23 services) 12/17/2013 6
Product price dataset
Objectives To identify stylized facts that characterize price setting
behaviour (e.g. The frequency of price change, price increases and price decreases)
To identify the dynamic features of price changes, including the synchronization of price changes and decomposition of inflation
To use data to ‘test’ consistency of theoretical models of price setting behaviour
To compare the stylised facts on price setting behaviour in Lesotho to other countries and South Africa in particular.
12/17/2013 7
Selected stylized facts - using price data 1. Heterogeneity in the frequency of price change
Heterogeneity across products :
Mean frequency of 37 percent (implied duration of 2.7 months)
The frequency of price change exceeds 40 percent (implied duration of 2.5 months or less) for a quarter of all product items.
For 24 percent of all product items, prices change at most once every 4 months (frequency of 24 percent or lower).
0
.02
.04
.06
.08
Fra
ctio
n
0 .2 .4 .6 .8Frequency of price change
12/17/2013 8
Selected stylized facts - using price data
12/17/2013 9
CPI weighted
Simple average Median
sd frequency
within products Implied duration
Goods 0.386 0.392 0.122 2.593
Food 0.44 0.447 0.131 2.275
Non-alcoholic beverages 0.351 0.383 0.12 2.851
Alcoholic beverages 0.228 0.266 0.092 4.384
Tobacco and narcotics 0.37 0.365 0.144 2.704
Clothing and footwear 0.357 0.376 0.108 2.803
Fuel 0.405 0.384 0.139 2.467
Household furniture and equipment 0.259 0.249 0.097 3.867
Household operations 0.373 0.372 0.121 2.68
Transport equipment 0.277 0.308 0.04 3.607
Personal care 0.314 0.322 0.123 3.187
Services 0.125 0.102 0.057 8.006
Medical care and health expenses 0.135 0.084 0.095 7.407
Recreation and culture 0.218 0.229 0.09 4.587
Education 0.087 0.087 0.048 11.553
Transport services 0.187 0.113 0.033 5.345
Other goods and services 0.293 0.217 0.104 3.412
Total 0.371 0.379 0.119 2.692
Heterogeneity within products across outlets
Selected stylized facts - using price data
• Large average size of price change, but many small price changes
12/17/2013 10
Selected stylized facts - using price data 2. Dynamic features of price changes: sources of
change in inflation
Gives important theoretical insights;
– In the time-dependent staggered price models of Taylor (1980) and Calvo (1983), the intensive margin (IM) accounts for all the variation in inflation,
– In some state-dependent pricing models, the frequency plays a substantial role (Malin and Klenow, 2011).
12/17/2013 11
Selected stylized facts - using price data
– Size of price changes (IM) is more closely associated (acc for 94.9 % of inflation) with inflation than the frequency of price changes (EM).
12/17/2013 12
Selected stylized facts - using price data – …but the frequency of price increases (decreases) is
positively (negatively) correlated with inflation
– Reductions in prices constitute an important source of
variation in inflation (34 percent of inflation variation) 12/17/2013 13
Selected stylized facts - using price data
3. Comparison with South Africa – Product markets in Lesotho are expected to be highly
integrated with those in South African – Frequency of price change much higher in Lesotho (47
percent vs. 17 percent)
– Significant positive association between frequency of price changes in the two countries • Driven by the frequency of price increases, not decreases.
– No association between size of price change
Dependent variable: Lesotho
Independent variable: South Africa Coef Std. Err Significance
Adj R2
Frequency price change 0.130 0.024 *** 0.42
Frequency price increase 0.187 0.026 *** 0.23
Frequency price decrease 0.044 0.033 0.28
Inflation 0.084 0.030 *** 0.06
12/17/2013 14
Concluding remarks - using price data
• We also look at many other stylized facts
– Duration and size, distribution of size, hazard rates
• What is missing in the price data analysis is the role of outlet characteristics. We use survey of retail outlets to unpack this.
12/17/2013 15
Administering survey
12/17/2013 16
The dataset Outlet survey data across the 10 districts of Lesotho
District Number of
outlets
Total
Sample
Number of
respondents
Response rate
Maseru 183 128 83 64.8
Butha-Buthe 56 39 29 74.4
Leribe 79 70 69 98.6
Berea 70 50 43 86.0
Mafeteng 83 39 29 74.4
Mohales' Hoek 91 41 36 87.8
Quthing 50 48 44 91.7
Qachas' Neck 47 42 39 92.9
Mokhotlong 66 39 35 89.7
Thaba-Tseka 49 39 34 87.2
Total 774 535 441 82.4
12/17/2013 17
Survey dataset
Objective
Identify role of location, competition and outlet level characteristics in determining price setting behaviour in Lesotho
Two channels to analyse price setting behaviour
Analyse the main price setting strategies of retail and services outlets
Analyse factors that prevent outlets from increasing prices of main product/service
12/17/2013 18
Preliminary results –survey data
1. What are main price setting strategies across outlets?
– Decision making process of price setting mostly
takes place within the outlet itself.
– Dominance of mark-up consistent with imperfectly competitive markets
Share of total responses (percent)
Variable Retail Services Total
Mark-up over costs 74.6 61.5 71.8
Government 2.4 6.6 3.3
Business council 3.3 7.7 4.3
The parent company/ Head quarters 15.5 11.0 14.5
Main competitor's price 4.2 13.2 6.2
12/17/2013 19
Preliminary results –survey data
2. Which factors delay increasing the price of the main product/service?
Main factors of price rigidity Share of all responses (percentage)
Important Very
important
Total
Coordination failure 16.9 27.7 44.6
Explicit contracts 5.8 8.0 13.7
Attractive thresholds 8.6 6.2 14.8
Menu costs 9.1 8.1 17.2
Implicit contracts 16.9 38.9 55.8
Bureaucratic rigidities 5.6 6.6 12.2
Other 5.0 11.7 16.7
12/17/2013 20
Merging the two datasets
Link the survey data with the retail price database
Analyse the main determinants of frequency of price change
– outlet characteristics and market structure
Use price data from January 2010-December 2012 which closely map the outlets in that sample
– Final sample has 370 mapped outlets and 14 main products
12/17/2013 21
Preliminary results
• Descriptive analysis: Unconditional relationships
1. The frequency of price changes is higher for large firms (31 %) than for small firms (29%)
2. Retail outlets change prices more frequently (30%) than services (24%)
3. The frequency is higher for supermarkets than other outlets and lower for chain stores than other outlets
4. Outlets with more competitors change prices more frequently (30%) than outlets with low competition (29%)
12/17/2013 22
Preliminary results – conditional relationships
The competition variable may be biased due to omitted variable, e.g. demand in that market
VARIABLES (1)
Outlet level
Number of competitors -0.003**
(0.002)
Outlet factors
Size of outlet 0.039***
(0.009)
Services -0.097***
(0.020)
Supermarket -0.038**
(0.017)
Chain 0.005
(0.013)
Incl. other controls(location, assets) Product fixed effects No
Area fixed effects Yes
Observations 280
Adj. R-squared 0.27
Columns 1 are basic regression and columns 2 are basic regressions with area fixed effects. Robust standard errors in
parentheses are clustered at outlet level. *** p<0.01, ** p<0.05, * p<0.1
12/17/2013 23
Results – Frequency price change • Instrumental variable approach
(1)
VARIABLES Outlet level
Number of competitors 0.020**
(0.009)
Outlet factors
Size of outlet 0.022**
(0.011)
Services -0.106***
(0.027)
Supermarket -0.053**
(0.023)
Chain -0.023
(0.016)
Plus controls (location and assets)
Observations 280
Adj. R-squared 0.83
12/17/2013
Concluding remarks • Most outlets set the prices of their main product based
on mark-up over costs
• Size of outlet and level of competition are important determinants of the frequency of price change – large outlets change prices more frequently than smaller
outlets – Outlets faced with more competition change prices more
frequently
• Implicit contracts or long-term relationships with
customers and coordination failure are important sources of price stickiness
12/17/2013 25
Way forward • Price database: extend the analysis to look at:
– product market integration, role of borders in driving price differences
– links between inflation, monetary policy and price setting behaviour
• Survey database: Unpack outlet characteristics in more
systematic way. – This involves investigating the endogeneity of competitive
measures in price setting decisions
• NB: We also want to raise finance to run survey again in
2015 to develop panel to analyse price dynamics at outlet level.
12/17/2013 26
Thank you!!!