Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Pr- L C~Qjv
USA ID FUNDED BY
UNITED STATES AGENCY FOR PRI MARY INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT EDUCATION
DEVELOPMENT
GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHiSTAN
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
PRIMARY EDUCATION DIRECTORATE
TRAINING AND CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT ON
TRAINING OF PROVINCIAL ENGINEERS CONSUMER TRAINING
FINAL REPORT
CONTRACTED BY
ACADEMY FOR EDUCATIONAL DYIVELOPMENT
(AED)
DEVELOPED BY A Human Resources Training
Development amp Consultancy Division of PERAC Ministry of Industries ampProduction Govt of Pakistan
A Division of
State Petroleum Refining amp PERACPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd
Ministry of Industries ampProduction Govt of Pakistan
TI61 ICPFINALRPT June 27 1994
Mr J J Bamji Technical Advisor Primary Education Development New Al-Gilani Road Mulla Khail St Que t t a
Subject FINAL REPORT
Dear Sir
After the successful completion of Training of Provincial Engineers Consumers Training We are enclosing Ten (10) sets of Final Report alangwith attachment as required by you
However if you ieqnired any more information or clarification we would be happy to supply you the same
We thank you for the confidence you have placed in the Pet roman and look forward to be continued relations with you in the future
Yours faithfully For STATE PETROLEUM REFINING AND
PETROCHEMICAL CORPN (PVT) LTD
KHALID HUSSAIN ACTING GENERAL MANAGER PETROMAN
SI nak
Musarrat Building Sultan Ahmed Shah Road Off Shaheed-e-Millat Road KARACHI PO Box No 8913 PABX 435310-442823-449451 438350 Fax 92-21-442885 Telex 21546 PERAC PK Cable PERAC
0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE NO
10 INTRODUCTION
20 APPROACH USED FOR DEVELOPING AND ORGANIZING THE TRAINING PROGRAM
30 TRAINING PROGRAM ITS COVERAGE AND PARTICIPATION 7
31 PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP 7
32 FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOPS 9
33 CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOPS 10
40 EFFECTIVFNESS AND EVALUATION OF THE TRAINING PROGRAM 12
CONCLUSIONS amp RECOMMENDATIONS 50 16
FINAL REPORT
10 INTRODUCTION
The Academy for Educational Development (AED) undlei a contract with USAID is providing technical assistance a il support to the Primary Education Development Programme in tit provinces of Balochistan and NWFP The activities of the program included improvement of technical skills ol the Provincial Engineers in the area of project monitoring management and field inspection In order to implement this activity AED invited proposals for providing training to provincial Engineers from various organizations including PETROMAN
In February 1994 AED sub-contracted the task of developintg and organizing the program for Provincial Engineers to PETROMAN
A OBJECTIVE For Provincial Engineers of Directorate of Civil Works Education Department Quetta Balochistan
The objectives of the training programme developed and organized by PETROMAN are follows
To impart training to the Divisional Engineers (DE)
and Sub-Divisional Officers (SDO) inshy
o Developing Job Descriptions
o ProjectContract Management
o Public Administration Human Relations
o Computer Aided Project Planning and Monitoing
o Team Work Motivation and Commitment
To impart training to the Sub-Divisional Officers (SDO) and Sub-Engineers in
o Developing Job Description
o Supervision of all construction activities at the project site including quality of work
Page No I
FINAL REPORT
o Field testing of all matedials in timely manner and to ensure that they are in compliance with the contract specification
o Accepting or rejecting BOQ work item performed
by the contractor
o Team work and Human Relations
o Improving r ral and Job Commitment
o Monitoring of field progress
o Preparation of measurement book and approval of contractors bill
B CONSUMERS TRAINING FOR DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICERS amp S[)B-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OFFICERS PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
U To impart training to the DEOs amp SDEOs in oversight responsibilities such as
o Requirements of various types work that iight be undertaken by the directorate of primary Education and the responsibility of all parties to the effective completion of those works
o The process of certification and payment of contractors and the importance of the quality assurance process with specific attention to DEOSDEO responsibilities
o Understanding technical drawings plans and work specifications so that those items requiring checks are monitored and that officers can properly review the site before they sign off on work done and
Page No 2
FINAL REPORT
o Duties obligation and responsibilities of Architectural and Engineering Firms field staff and Directorate of Civil Works Education Department field staff and their powers authority and limits
To impart training in basic field inspection and observation techniques that are within the capacity of educated lay persons (non-engineers)
o Inspection of quality of material and workmianship at various stages of constructiooperatioo
o Knowledge of Bar-Char and monitoring the progress of wotk in the field and
o Team work Motivation commitment and Coordinashytion and other organizations and agencies involvedaffected in the execution of the works
PETRO AN has successfully completed all the activities involved in developing and organizing the training program as per contractual requihwnents and is submitting its final report The report presents the methodology adopted for developing the training program its coverage and participation program effectiveness and evaluation In the end of the report the conclusions and recommendations have been presented
PETROMAN is thankful to AED for assigning the woik and hope that the training program has been able to achieve the designed objectives
PETROMAN also wishes to express its appreciation to officials (if ALD and relevant departments of Governments of Balochistan and NWFP for providing guidance support and assistance during the course of the assignment A special gratitude is also directed to the participants of various workshops for their interest and involvement in various subjects
Page No 3
FINAL REPORT
20 AFOROACHI USED FOR DEVELOPING AND ORGANIZING TIIE TRAINING
PROGRAM
The Sub-Contract between PETROMAN and AED having an effective
date of January 1 1994 was executed on February 3 1994 Subsequently AED alo assigned the work of conducting
consumer training for DEOs and SDEOs The work to be undershy
taken by PETROMAN was divided into three phases ie I II and III The Phase-I covered
0 Training need assessment
Development of Wnrkshop curriculum and traiiiing mateiial
N Daita collection for development of field engineers manual
lin Phase-II the Field Engineers Manual was developed while in Phase-III the seven workshops were organized The approach used by PETROMAN for developing and organizing the training program is explained in the following paragraphs
N Phase-I
Training Need Assessment
The training need assessment was the first activity undertaken by PETROMAN for this assignment For this purpose the required questionnaires anti fonats were developed and a five member team of PETROMAN headed by Mr
M N Hussain Chief Counselor visited Quetta during February 27 to March 1 1994 A follow-up visit was also undertaken in the last week of April 1994 in these visits Training Need Assessment questionnaires were completed various officials were interviewed school sites were visited and data for development of field inspection manual was also collected The specimen questionnaire and
interview form is given in Appendix - I IETROMAN faced some difficulty in conipleting the Training Need Assessment questionnaires The interviews with various officials however were very useful and were used as base material for training need assessment The officials interviewed included-
Page No 4
4 iFINAL REPORT
o Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Deputy Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Director Primary Education Development
o Chief Engineer Department of Communication amp Works
(C amp W)
o Technical Advisor C amp W
o Superintendent Engineer C amp W
o Technical Advisor Teacher Training amp Supply PED
o Proiect Manager Engineering Consultant
The PFTROMAN team visited the following School sitesshy
o Government Girls Lady Syndmen School
o Government Girls Model Ifigh School Mission Road
o Government Middle School Police Lirvs
o Government Girls High School Postal Colony
Based on the data collected during the PETROMAN teams
visits and subsequent discussions and communication exchanged with AED officials the following tasks were undertaken
o Establishing the objectives of workshops
o Detei-mining the design and structure of the workshops
o Developing the detailed curriculum (sbjects to be
covered)
o Determining the training methodology to be adopted
o Developing the training material and manuals ie Field Engineers consumer field manual
Page No 5
FINAL REPORT
toThe envisaged training methodology gave due emphasis
and theoretical instructions wereparticipatory style
supplemented with solution of practical problems and field
visits
Phase-II manuals wereThe field eagineers and consumer field
on the data collected during PETROMANscompiled based team visits interviews with officials consultation with
specialists and printed material obtained from various
was finalized after a thoroughsources The draft manual review by the Technical Advisor PED
Phase-III followingUnder the assignment PETROMAN organized the
seven training workshops in Quetta Balochistanshy
9 - 12o Project Management amp Monitoring work-shop May
1994
- 16 1994a Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-III May 31 - June 2 1994
o Consumer Training Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
o Cutisumer Training Workshop-H June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training workshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
Page No 6
an FINAL REPORT
30 TRAINING PROGRAM ITS COVERAE AND PARTICIPATION
The training program organized by PETROMAN corrprised of
following seven training workshops
o Project Management amp Monitoring Workshop May 9 - 12 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14 - 16 11j94
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop- 11 May 31 - Juii 2 1994
o Consumer Traiiiinhig Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
(onsumer Trai iing Workshop-I June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training Wnikshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
In the paragraphs to follow aii overview (f workshops and
their parLicipation is given
31 Project Management amp Monitoring WorkshoLp
This workshop was held in Quetta during May 9 - 12 1994
The workshop was attended by Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers The subjects covered were divided
into two groups In group-I the aspects related to
management motivation and contract management were
covered In group-IL the quantitative asptccts of
construction management were addressed
The management amp contract administration area were
covered by Mr M N lussain General Manager (Planning amp
Coordination) State Petroleum Refining and Petrochemical Corporation (PERAC)
Page No 7
FINAL REPORT
Mr lussain in his presentation first addressed the nature importance and role of motivation in managemerit lHe stressed that motivation is vital for an individual to give his best fie also explained in detail the attitudes and behaviour of employees reflect ing niotivivation or the lack of it lie also presented view pu(ints of leading behavioral scientists about motivation and explained the modes of group behaviour and presented the guidelines and tips for good and effective human relaLions
Mr llussain also gave a detail presentation on contract preparation planning administration and negotiation process Number of sample contracts wer also presented and discussed During the presentation the participants took keen interest and gave their views and reactions on various subjects
The 3rd and 4th study of the workshop was dedicated to (Juantitative aspects of construction management Mr Ubaid Hlasan Akhtar who is working as Assistant Professor at the Civil Engineering Department of NED
University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi conducted this part of the workshop Mr Akhtar after giving an ow(irview of construction management gave a detailed presentation on project monitoring t echniques ie Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Eva i uat ion amp Review Technique (PEampRT) The presentation on CPM dealt with the procedure and application areas of CPM real life problems were also discussed The participants were given exercises for critical path computation and developing CPM for various projects The presentation on PERT gave details of the PERT technique its application and utility Detailed explanation of the concept of probability and normal probability distribution was also presented alongwith a case study
The course material given to the participants alongwith the exercise undertaken by the participants is presented in Volume-Il(a) amp 11(b) of this report
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-III
Page No 8
1FINAL REPORT
32 Field Inspection Workshops As stated earlier three field inspection workshops were organized by PETROMAN during the months of MayJune 1994 The first workshop was held duriing May 14 - 16 1994 while the second workshop was held during May 28 shy30 1994 The third workshop was held ftoji May 31 - June 02 1994 The three workshops were attended by 37 participants All the three workshops weie conducted by Dr S M Makhdumi Chief Counsellor Technical) and Mi Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor Mr Makhdumi holds PHID in Civil Engineering and presently working as Chaiiirman Civil Engineering Department NEI) University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi Mr Khaiii hold a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering and is presently working at NED University of engineering amp Technology Karachi In the first part of the workshop Mr Makhdumi explained various aspects of building drawings their layout and foundation plan the practical problems being faced by the engineers in bu-ilding constrution were alst discussed In the later part of the workshop Dr Makhdumi explaiined the need and priuciples of ihspection and quality control and enforcement of specificat ions liI run-dun of the field inspection manual developed by PETROMAN as part of the assigment was also given (thefield inspection manual is presented inj Volume-II(c) amp 11(d) All the stages of inspection and quality control for a typical building project weire also discussed in tietail Various proformas to be used for inspection purposes were also discussed and views of the participants were obtained
The standards normally employed for construction of buildings were also discussed Dr Makhdumi also apprised the participants about the procedure of est imating preparation of Bill of Quantities (BJQs) and rate analyses for civil works The participants of each workshop visited various school sites The participants of first workshop visited the following sitesshy
o Government Girls High School Pringabad - Mastung
o Government Girls Middle School Shamsabad Mastung-
o Government Girls Primary School Mir Hasan - Mastung
Page No 9
1FINAL REPORT
The Government Middle School Shainsabad - Mastung was completed in 1993 4hile the remaiining two schools were at various stages of construction Dui ig the visit participants physically inspected the building anid gave their views on quality of const1tctLion and ways and means to be employed for further improving the quality of coiistruction The part icipauits iso gavw2 ihe~i views on the availability of constructtion material in the area and the piovince
The participants of seconid and third workshops visited the following school sitesshy
o Government Boys Middle School Machan - Pishin
o Government Buys Middle School Yaroo - Pishin
o Multigrade Girls Primary School Haideir Zai - Pishin
o Gove riment Girls Primary School Pod Gal i Chowk -Quetta
o Government Girls Primary School Saida Varez - Quetta
o Government Boys Primary School Sardar larez - Quetta
o Government Girls High School Irrigiicn Colony -
Quetta
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-lI
33 Consumer Training Workshops PETROMAN as part of the assignment organized three consumer training workshops The first workshop was held from June 04 - 06 1994 while Lile second workshop was held during June 12 -14 1994 The third workshop was organized from June 15 - 17 1994 The three workshops were attend by 65 participants The workshop were organized with the objective of equipping tile District Education Officer and Sub-Division Education Officer with the basic features of buildiiig construction principles of inspection and considering for site selection and buildings takeover
Page No 10
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
State Petroleum Refining amp PERACPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd
Ministry of Industries ampProduction Govt of Pakistan
TI61 ICPFINALRPT June 27 1994
Mr J J Bamji Technical Advisor Primary Education Development New Al-Gilani Road Mulla Khail St Que t t a
Subject FINAL REPORT
Dear Sir
After the successful completion of Training of Provincial Engineers Consumers Training We are enclosing Ten (10) sets of Final Report alangwith attachment as required by you
However if you ieqnired any more information or clarification we would be happy to supply you the same
We thank you for the confidence you have placed in the Pet roman and look forward to be continued relations with you in the future
Yours faithfully For STATE PETROLEUM REFINING AND
PETROCHEMICAL CORPN (PVT) LTD
KHALID HUSSAIN ACTING GENERAL MANAGER PETROMAN
SI nak
Musarrat Building Sultan Ahmed Shah Road Off Shaheed-e-Millat Road KARACHI PO Box No 8913 PABX 435310-442823-449451 438350 Fax 92-21-442885 Telex 21546 PERAC PK Cable PERAC
0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE NO
10 INTRODUCTION
20 APPROACH USED FOR DEVELOPING AND ORGANIZING THE TRAINING PROGRAM
30 TRAINING PROGRAM ITS COVERAGE AND PARTICIPATION 7
31 PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP 7
32 FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOPS 9
33 CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOPS 10
40 EFFECTIVFNESS AND EVALUATION OF THE TRAINING PROGRAM 12
CONCLUSIONS amp RECOMMENDATIONS 50 16
FINAL REPORT
10 INTRODUCTION
The Academy for Educational Development (AED) undlei a contract with USAID is providing technical assistance a il support to the Primary Education Development Programme in tit provinces of Balochistan and NWFP The activities of the program included improvement of technical skills ol the Provincial Engineers in the area of project monitoring management and field inspection In order to implement this activity AED invited proposals for providing training to provincial Engineers from various organizations including PETROMAN
In February 1994 AED sub-contracted the task of developintg and organizing the program for Provincial Engineers to PETROMAN
A OBJECTIVE For Provincial Engineers of Directorate of Civil Works Education Department Quetta Balochistan
The objectives of the training programme developed and organized by PETROMAN are follows
To impart training to the Divisional Engineers (DE)
and Sub-Divisional Officers (SDO) inshy
o Developing Job Descriptions
o ProjectContract Management
o Public Administration Human Relations
o Computer Aided Project Planning and Monitoing
o Team Work Motivation and Commitment
To impart training to the Sub-Divisional Officers (SDO) and Sub-Engineers in
o Developing Job Description
o Supervision of all construction activities at the project site including quality of work
Page No I
FINAL REPORT
o Field testing of all matedials in timely manner and to ensure that they are in compliance with the contract specification
o Accepting or rejecting BOQ work item performed
by the contractor
o Team work and Human Relations
o Improving r ral and Job Commitment
o Monitoring of field progress
o Preparation of measurement book and approval of contractors bill
B CONSUMERS TRAINING FOR DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICERS amp S[)B-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OFFICERS PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
U To impart training to the DEOs amp SDEOs in oversight responsibilities such as
o Requirements of various types work that iight be undertaken by the directorate of primary Education and the responsibility of all parties to the effective completion of those works
o The process of certification and payment of contractors and the importance of the quality assurance process with specific attention to DEOSDEO responsibilities
o Understanding technical drawings plans and work specifications so that those items requiring checks are monitored and that officers can properly review the site before they sign off on work done and
Page No 2
FINAL REPORT
o Duties obligation and responsibilities of Architectural and Engineering Firms field staff and Directorate of Civil Works Education Department field staff and their powers authority and limits
To impart training in basic field inspection and observation techniques that are within the capacity of educated lay persons (non-engineers)
o Inspection of quality of material and workmianship at various stages of constructiooperatioo
o Knowledge of Bar-Char and monitoring the progress of wotk in the field and
o Team work Motivation commitment and Coordinashytion and other organizations and agencies involvedaffected in the execution of the works
PETRO AN has successfully completed all the activities involved in developing and organizing the training program as per contractual requihwnents and is submitting its final report The report presents the methodology adopted for developing the training program its coverage and participation program effectiveness and evaluation In the end of the report the conclusions and recommendations have been presented
PETROMAN is thankful to AED for assigning the woik and hope that the training program has been able to achieve the designed objectives
PETROMAN also wishes to express its appreciation to officials (if ALD and relevant departments of Governments of Balochistan and NWFP for providing guidance support and assistance during the course of the assignment A special gratitude is also directed to the participants of various workshops for their interest and involvement in various subjects
Page No 3
FINAL REPORT
20 AFOROACHI USED FOR DEVELOPING AND ORGANIZING TIIE TRAINING
PROGRAM
The Sub-Contract between PETROMAN and AED having an effective
date of January 1 1994 was executed on February 3 1994 Subsequently AED alo assigned the work of conducting
consumer training for DEOs and SDEOs The work to be undershy
taken by PETROMAN was divided into three phases ie I II and III The Phase-I covered
0 Training need assessment
Development of Wnrkshop curriculum and traiiiing mateiial
N Daita collection for development of field engineers manual
lin Phase-II the Field Engineers Manual was developed while in Phase-III the seven workshops were organized The approach used by PETROMAN for developing and organizing the training program is explained in the following paragraphs
N Phase-I
Training Need Assessment
The training need assessment was the first activity undertaken by PETROMAN for this assignment For this purpose the required questionnaires anti fonats were developed and a five member team of PETROMAN headed by Mr
M N Hussain Chief Counselor visited Quetta during February 27 to March 1 1994 A follow-up visit was also undertaken in the last week of April 1994 in these visits Training Need Assessment questionnaires were completed various officials were interviewed school sites were visited and data for development of field inspection manual was also collected The specimen questionnaire and
interview form is given in Appendix - I IETROMAN faced some difficulty in conipleting the Training Need Assessment questionnaires The interviews with various officials however were very useful and were used as base material for training need assessment The officials interviewed included-
Page No 4
4 iFINAL REPORT
o Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Deputy Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Director Primary Education Development
o Chief Engineer Department of Communication amp Works
(C amp W)
o Technical Advisor C amp W
o Superintendent Engineer C amp W
o Technical Advisor Teacher Training amp Supply PED
o Proiect Manager Engineering Consultant
The PFTROMAN team visited the following School sitesshy
o Government Girls Lady Syndmen School
o Government Girls Model Ifigh School Mission Road
o Government Middle School Police Lirvs
o Government Girls High School Postal Colony
Based on the data collected during the PETROMAN teams
visits and subsequent discussions and communication exchanged with AED officials the following tasks were undertaken
o Establishing the objectives of workshops
o Detei-mining the design and structure of the workshops
o Developing the detailed curriculum (sbjects to be
covered)
o Determining the training methodology to be adopted
o Developing the training material and manuals ie Field Engineers consumer field manual
Page No 5
FINAL REPORT
toThe envisaged training methodology gave due emphasis
and theoretical instructions wereparticipatory style
supplemented with solution of practical problems and field
visits
Phase-II manuals wereThe field eagineers and consumer field
on the data collected during PETROMANscompiled based team visits interviews with officials consultation with
specialists and printed material obtained from various
was finalized after a thoroughsources The draft manual review by the Technical Advisor PED
Phase-III followingUnder the assignment PETROMAN organized the
seven training workshops in Quetta Balochistanshy
9 - 12o Project Management amp Monitoring work-shop May
1994
- 16 1994a Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-III May 31 - June 2 1994
o Consumer Training Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
o Cutisumer Training Workshop-H June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training workshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
Page No 6
an FINAL REPORT
30 TRAINING PROGRAM ITS COVERAE AND PARTICIPATION
The training program organized by PETROMAN corrprised of
following seven training workshops
o Project Management amp Monitoring Workshop May 9 - 12 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14 - 16 11j94
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop- 11 May 31 - Juii 2 1994
o Consumer Traiiiinhig Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
(onsumer Trai iing Workshop-I June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training Wnikshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
In the paragraphs to follow aii overview (f workshops and
their parLicipation is given
31 Project Management amp Monitoring WorkshoLp
This workshop was held in Quetta during May 9 - 12 1994
The workshop was attended by Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers The subjects covered were divided
into two groups In group-I the aspects related to
management motivation and contract management were
covered In group-IL the quantitative asptccts of
construction management were addressed
The management amp contract administration area were
covered by Mr M N lussain General Manager (Planning amp
Coordination) State Petroleum Refining and Petrochemical Corporation (PERAC)
Page No 7
FINAL REPORT
Mr lussain in his presentation first addressed the nature importance and role of motivation in managemerit lHe stressed that motivation is vital for an individual to give his best fie also explained in detail the attitudes and behaviour of employees reflect ing niotivivation or the lack of it lie also presented view pu(ints of leading behavioral scientists about motivation and explained the modes of group behaviour and presented the guidelines and tips for good and effective human relaLions
Mr llussain also gave a detail presentation on contract preparation planning administration and negotiation process Number of sample contracts wer also presented and discussed During the presentation the participants took keen interest and gave their views and reactions on various subjects
The 3rd and 4th study of the workshop was dedicated to (Juantitative aspects of construction management Mr Ubaid Hlasan Akhtar who is working as Assistant Professor at the Civil Engineering Department of NED
University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi conducted this part of the workshop Mr Akhtar after giving an ow(irview of construction management gave a detailed presentation on project monitoring t echniques ie Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Eva i uat ion amp Review Technique (PEampRT) The presentation on CPM dealt with the procedure and application areas of CPM real life problems were also discussed The participants were given exercises for critical path computation and developing CPM for various projects The presentation on PERT gave details of the PERT technique its application and utility Detailed explanation of the concept of probability and normal probability distribution was also presented alongwith a case study
The course material given to the participants alongwith the exercise undertaken by the participants is presented in Volume-Il(a) amp 11(b) of this report
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-III
Page No 8
1FINAL REPORT
32 Field Inspection Workshops As stated earlier three field inspection workshops were organized by PETROMAN during the months of MayJune 1994 The first workshop was held duriing May 14 - 16 1994 while the second workshop was held during May 28 shy30 1994 The third workshop was held ftoji May 31 - June 02 1994 The three workshops were attended by 37 participants All the three workshops weie conducted by Dr S M Makhdumi Chief Counsellor Technical) and Mi Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor Mr Makhdumi holds PHID in Civil Engineering and presently working as Chaiiirman Civil Engineering Department NEI) University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi Mr Khaiii hold a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering and is presently working at NED University of engineering amp Technology Karachi In the first part of the workshop Mr Makhdumi explained various aspects of building drawings their layout and foundation plan the practical problems being faced by the engineers in bu-ilding constrution were alst discussed In the later part of the workshop Dr Makhdumi explaiined the need and priuciples of ihspection and quality control and enforcement of specificat ions liI run-dun of the field inspection manual developed by PETROMAN as part of the assigment was also given (thefield inspection manual is presented inj Volume-II(c) amp 11(d) All the stages of inspection and quality control for a typical building project weire also discussed in tietail Various proformas to be used for inspection purposes were also discussed and views of the participants were obtained
The standards normally employed for construction of buildings were also discussed Dr Makhdumi also apprised the participants about the procedure of est imating preparation of Bill of Quantities (BJQs) and rate analyses for civil works The participants of each workshop visited various school sites The participants of first workshop visited the following sitesshy
o Government Girls High School Pringabad - Mastung
o Government Girls Middle School Shamsabad Mastung-
o Government Girls Primary School Mir Hasan - Mastung
Page No 9
1FINAL REPORT
The Government Middle School Shainsabad - Mastung was completed in 1993 4hile the remaiining two schools were at various stages of construction Dui ig the visit participants physically inspected the building anid gave their views on quality of const1tctLion and ways and means to be employed for further improving the quality of coiistruction The part icipauits iso gavw2 ihe~i views on the availability of constructtion material in the area and the piovince
The participants of seconid and third workshops visited the following school sitesshy
o Government Boys Middle School Machan - Pishin
o Government Buys Middle School Yaroo - Pishin
o Multigrade Girls Primary School Haideir Zai - Pishin
o Gove riment Girls Primary School Pod Gal i Chowk -Quetta
o Government Girls Primary School Saida Varez - Quetta
o Government Boys Primary School Sardar larez - Quetta
o Government Girls High School Irrigiicn Colony -
Quetta
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-lI
33 Consumer Training Workshops PETROMAN as part of the assignment organized three consumer training workshops The first workshop was held from June 04 - 06 1994 while Lile second workshop was held during June 12 -14 1994 The third workshop was organized from June 15 - 17 1994 The three workshops were attend by 65 participants The workshop were organized with the objective of equipping tile District Education Officer and Sub-Division Education Officer with the basic features of buildiiig construction principles of inspection and considering for site selection and buildings takeover
Page No 10
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE NO
10 INTRODUCTION
20 APPROACH USED FOR DEVELOPING AND ORGANIZING THE TRAINING PROGRAM
30 TRAINING PROGRAM ITS COVERAGE AND PARTICIPATION 7
31 PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP 7
32 FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOPS 9
33 CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOPS 10
40 EFFECTIVFNESS AND EVALUATION OF THE TRAINING PROGRAM 12
CONCLUSIONS amp RECOMMENDATIONS 50 16
FINAL REPORT
10 INTRODUCTION
The Academy for Educational Development (AED) undlei a contract with USAID is providing technical assistance a il support to the Primary Education Development Programme in tit provinces of Balochistan and NWFP The activities of the program included improvement of technical skills ol the Provincial Engineers in the area of project monitoring management and field inspection In order to implement this activity AED invited proposals for providing training to provincial Engineers from various organizations including PETROMAN
In February 1994 AED sub-contracted the task of developintg and organizing the program for Provincial Engineers to PETROMAN
A OBJECTIVE For Provincial Engineers of Directorate of Civil Works Education Department Quetta Balochistan
The objectives of the training programme developed and organized by PETROMAN are follows
To impart training to the Divisional Engineers (DE)
and Sub-Divisional Officers (SDO) inshy
o Developing Job Descriptions
o ProjectContract Management
o Public Administration Human Relations
o Computer Aided Project Planning and Monitoing
o Team Work Motivation and Commitment
To impart training to the Sub-Divisional Officers (SDO) and Sub-Engineers in
o Developing Job Description
o Supervision of all construction activities at the project site including quality of work
Page No I
FINAL REPORT
o Field testing of all matedials in timely manner and to ensure that they are in compliance with the contract specification
o Accepting or rejecting BOQ work item performed
by the contractor
o Team work and Human Relations
o Improving r ral and Job Commitment
o Monitoring of field progress
o Preparation of measurement book and approval of contractors bill
B CONSUMERS TRAINING FOR DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICERS amp S[)B-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OFFICERS PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
U To impart training to the DEOs amp SDEOs in oversight responsibilities such as
o Requirements of various types work that iight be undertaken by the directorate of primary Education and the responsibility of all parties to the effective completion of those works
o The process of certification and payment of contractors and the importance of the quality assurance process with specific attention to DEOSDEO responsibilities
o Understanding technical drawings plans and work specifications so that those items requiring checks are monitored and that officers can properly review the site before they sign off on work done and
Page No 2
FINAL REPORT
o Duties obligation and responsibilities of Architectural and Engineering Firms field staff and Directorate of Civil Works Education Department field staff and their powers authority and limits
To impart training in basic field inspection and observation techniques that are within the capacity of educated lay persons (non-engineers)
o Inspection of quality of material and workmianship at various stages of constructiooperatioo
o Knowledge of Bar-Char and monitoring the progress of wotk in the field and
o Team work Motivation commitment and Coordinashytion and other organizations and agencies involvedaffected in the execution of the works
PETRO AN has successfully completed all the activities involved in developing and organizing the training program as per contractual requihwnents and is submitting its final report The report presents the methodology adopted for developing the training program its coverage and participation program effectiveness and evaluation In the end of the report the conclusions and recommendations have been presented
PETROMAN is thankful to AED for assigning the woik and hope that the training program has been able to achieve the designed objectives
PETROMAN also wishes to express its appreciation to officials (if ALD and relevant departments of Governments of Balochistan and NWFP for providing guidance support and assistance during the course of the assignment A special gratitude is also directed to the participants of various workshops for their interest and involvement in various subjects
Page No 3
FINAL REPORT
20 AFOROACHI USED FOR DEVELOPING AND ORGANIZING TIIE TRAINING
PROGRAM
The Sub-Contract between PETROMAN and AED having an effective
date of January 1 1994 was executed on February 3 1994 Subsequently AED alo assigned the work of conducting
consumer training for DEOs and SDEOs The work to be undershy
taken by PETROMAN was divided into three phases ie I II and III The Phase-I covered
0 Training need assessment
Development of Wnrkshop curriculum and traiiiing mateiial
N Daita collection for development of field engineers manual
lin Phase-II the Field Engineers Manual was developed while in Phase-III the seven workshops were organized The approach used by PETROMAN for developing and organizing the training program is explained in the following paragraphs
N Phase-I
Training Need Assessment
The training need assessment was the first activity undertaken by PETROMAN for this assignment For this purpose the required questionnaires anti fonats were developed and a five member team of PETROMAN headed by Mr
M N Hussain Chief Counselor visited Quetta during February 27 to March 1 1994 A follow-up visit was also undertaken in the last week of April 1994 in these visits Training Need Assessment questionnaires were completed various officials were interviewed school sites were visited and data for development of field inspection manual was also collected The specimen questionnaire and
interview form is given in Appendix - I IETROMAN faced some difficulty in conipleting the Training Need Assessment questionnaires The interviews with various officials however were very useful and were used as base material for training need assessment The officials interviewed included-
Page No 4
4 iFINAL REPORT
o Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Deputy Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Director Primary Education Development
o Chief Engineer Department of Communication amp Works
(C amp W)
o Technical Advisor C amp W
o Superintendent Engineer C amp W
o Technical Advisor Teacher Training amp Supply PED
o Proiect Manager Engineering Consultant
The PFTROMAN team visited the following School sitesshy
o Government Girls Lady Syndmen School
o Government Girls Model Ifigh School Mission Road
o Government Middle School Police Lirvs
o Government Girls High School Postal Colony
Based on the data collected during the PETROMAN teams
visits and subsequent discussions and communication exchanged with AED officials the following tasks were undertaken
o Establishing the objectives of workshops
o Detei-mining the design and structure of the workshops
o Developing the detailed curriculum (sbjects to be
covered)
o Determining the training methodology to be adopted
o Developing the training material and manuals ie Field Engineers consumer field manual
Page No 5
FINAL REPORT
toThe envisaged training methodology gave due emphasis
and theoretical instructions wereparticipatory style
supplemented with solution of practical problems and field
visits
Phase-II manuals wereThe field eagineers and consumer field
on the data collected during PETROMANscompiled based team visits interviews with officials consultation with
specialists and printed material obtained from various
was finalized after a thoroughsources The draft manual review by the Technical Advisor PED
Phase-III followingUnder the assignment PETROMAN organized the
seven training workshops in Quetta Balochistanshy
9 - 12o Project Management amp Monitoring work-shop May
1994
- 16 1994a Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-III May 31 - June 2 1994
o Consumer Training Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
o Cutisumer Training Workshop-H June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training workshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
Page No 6
an FINAL REPORT
30 TRAINING PROGRAM ITS COVERAE AND PARTICIPATION
The training program organized by PETROMAN corrprised of
following seven training workshops
o Project Management amp Monitoring Workshop May 9 - 12 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14 - 16 11j94
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop- 11 May 31 - Juii 2 1994
o Consumer Traiiiinhig Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
(onsumer Trai iing Workshop-I June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training Wnikshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
In the paragraphs to follow aii overview (f workshops and
their parLicipation is given
31 Project Management amp Monitoring WorkshoLp
This workshop was held in Quetta during May 9 - 12 1994
The workshop was attended by Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers The subjects covered were divided
into two groups In group-I the aspects related to
management motivation and contract management were
covered In group-IL the quantitative asptccts of
construction management were addressed
The management amp contract administration area were
covered by Mr M N lussain General Manager (Planning amp
Coordination) State Petroleum Refining and Petrochemical Corporation (PERAC)
Page No 7
FINAL REPORT
Mr lussain in his presentation first addressed the nature importance and role of motivation in managemerit lHe stressed that motivation is vital for an individual to give his best fie also explained in detail the attitudes and behaviour of employees reflect ing niotivivation or the lack of it lie also presented view pu(ints of leading behavioral scientists about motivation and explained the modes of group behaviour and presented the guidelines and tips for good and effective human relaLions
Mr llussain also gave a detail presentation on contract preparation planning administration and negotiation process Number of sample contracts wer also presented and discussed During the presentation the participants took keen interest and gave their views and reactions on various subjects
The 3rd and 4th study of the workshop was dedicated to (Juantitative aspects of construction management Mr Ubaid Hlasan Akhtar who is working as Assistant Professor at the Civil Engineering Department of NED
University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi conducted this part of the workshop Mr Akhtar after giving an ow(irview of construction management gave a detailed presentation on project monitoring t echniques ie Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Eva i uat ion amp Review Technique (PEampRT) The presentation on CPM dealt with the procedure and application areas of CPM real life problems were also discussed The participants were given exercises for critical path computation and developing CPM for various projects The presentation on PERT gave details of the PERT technique its application and utility Detailed explanation of the concept of probability and normal probability distribution was also presented alongwith a case study
The course material given to the participants alongwith the exercise undertaken by the participants is presented in Volume-Il(a) amp 11(b) of this report
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-III
Page No 8
1FINAL REPORT
32 Field Inspection Workshops As stated earlier three field inspection workshops were organized by PETROMAN during the months of MayJune 1994 The first workshop was held duriing May 14 - 16 1994 while the second workshop was held during May 28 shy30 1994 The third workshop was held ftoji May 31 - June 02 1994 The three workshops were attended by 37 participants All the three workshops weie conducted by Dr S M Makhdumi Chief Counsellor Technical) and Mi Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor Mr Makhdumi holds PHID in Civil Engineering and presently working as Chaiiirman Civil Engineering Department NEI) University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi Mr Khaiii hold a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering and is presently working at NED University of engineering amp Technology Karachi In the first part of the workshop Mr Makhdumi explained various aspects of building drawings their layout and foundation plan the practical problems being faced by the engineers in bu-ilding constrution were alst discussed In the later part of the workshop Dr Makhdumi explaiined the need and priuciples of ihspection and quality control and enforcement of specificat ions liI run-dun of the field inspection manual developed by PETROMAN as part of the assigment was also given (thefield inspection manual is presented inj Volume-II(c) amp 11(d) All the stages of inspection and quality control for a typical building project weire also discussed in tietail Various proformas to be used for inspection purposes were also discussed and views of the participants were obtained
The standards normally employed for construction of buildings were also discussed Dr Makhdumi also apprised the participants about the procedure of est imating preparation of Bill of Quantities (BJQs) and rate analyses for civil works The participants of each workshop visited various school sites The participants of first workshop visited the following sitesshy
o Government Girls High School Pringabad - Mastung
o Government Girls Middle School Shamsabad Mastung-
o Government Girls Primary School Mir Hasan - Mastung
Page No 9
1FINAL REPORT
The Government Middle School Shainsabad - Mastung was completed in 1993 4hile the remaiining two schools were at various stages of construction Dui ig the visit participants physically inspected the building anid gave their views on quality of const1tctLion and ways and means to be employed for further improving the quality of coiistruction The part icipauits iso gavw2 ihe~i views on the availability of constructtion material in the area and the piovince
The participants of seconid and third workshops visited the following school sitesshy
o Government Boys Middle School Machan - Pishin
o Government Buys Middle School Yaroo - Pishin
o Multigrade Girls Primary School Haideir Zai - Pishin
o Gove riment Girls Primary School Pod Gal i Chowk -Quetta
o Government Girls Primary School Saida Varez - Quetta
o Government Boys Primary School Sardar larez - Quetta
o Government Girls High School Irrigiicn Colony -
Quetta
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-lI
33 Consumer Training Workshops PETROMAN as part of the assignment organized three consumer training workshops The first workshop was held from June 04 - 06 1994 while Lile second workshop was held during June 12 -14 1994 The third workshop was organized from June 15 - 17 1994 The three workshops were attend by 65 participants The workshop were organized with the objective of equipping tile District Education Officer and Sub-Division Education Officer with the basic features of buildiiig construction principles of inspection and considering for site selection and buildings takeover
Page No 10
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
FINAL REPORT
10 INTRODUCTION
The Academy for Educational Development (AED) undlei a contract with USAID is providing technical assistance a il support to the Primary Education Development Programme in tit provinces of Balochistan and NWFP The activities of the program included improvement of technical skills ol the Provincial Engineers in the area of project monitoring management and field inspection In order to implement this activity AED invited proposals for providing training to provincial Engineers from various organizations including PETROMAN
In February 1994 AED sub-contracted the task of developintg and organizing the program for Provincial Engineers to PETROMAN
A OBJECTIVE For Provincial Engineers of Directorate of Civil Works Education Department Quetta Balochistan
The objectives of the training programme developed and organized by PETROMAN are follows
To impart training to the Divisional Engineers (DE)
and Sub-Divisional Officers (SDO) inshy
o Developing Job Descriptions
o ProjectContract Management
o Public Administration Human Relations
o Computer Aided Project Planning and Monitoing
o Team Work Motivation and Commitment
To impart training to the Sub-Divisional Officers (SDO) and Sub-Engineers in
o Developing Job Description
o Supervision of all construction activities at the project site including quality of work
Page No I
FINAL REPORT
o Field testing of all matedials in timely manner and to ensure that they are in compliance with the contract specification
o Accepting or rejecting BOQ work item performed
by the contractor
o Team work and Human Relations
o Improving r ral and Job Commitment
o Monitoring of field progress
o Preparation of measurement book and approval of contractors bill
B CONSUMERS TRAINING FOR DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICERS amp S[)B-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OFFICERS PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
U To impart training to the DEOs amp SDEOs in oversight responsibilities such as
o Requirements of various types work that iight be undertaken by the directorate of primary Education and the responsibility of all parties to the effective completion of those works
o The process of certification and payment of contractors and the importance of the quality assurance process with specific attention to DEOSDEO responsibilities
o Understanding technical drawings plans and work specifications so that those items requiring checks are monitored and that officers can properly review the site before they sign off on work done and
Page No 2
FINAL REPORT
o Duties obligation and responsibilities of Architectural and Engineering Firms field staff and Directorate of Civil Works Education Department field staff and their powers authority and limits
To impart training in basic field inspection and observation techniques that are within the capacity of educated lay persons (non-engineers)
o Inspection of quality of material and workmianship at various stages of constructiooperatioo
o Knowledge of Bar-Char and monitoring the progress of wotk in the field and
o Team work Motivation commitment and Coordinashytion and other organizations and agencies involvedaffected in the execution of the works
PETRO AN has successfully completed all the activities involved in developing and organizing the training program as per contractual requihwnents and is submitting its final report The report presents the methodology adopted for developing the training program its coverage and participation program effectiveness and evaluation In the end of the report the conclusions and recommendations have been presented
PETROMAN is thankful to AED for assigning the woik and hope that the training program has been able to achieve the designed objectives
PETROMAN also wishes to express its appreciation to officials (if ALD and relevant departments of Governments of Balochistan and NWFP for providing guidance support and assistance during the course of the assignment A special gratitude is also directed to the participants of various workshops for their interest and involvement in various subjects
Page No 3
FINAL REPORT
20 AFOROACHI USED FOR DEVELOPING AND ORGANIZING TIIE TRAINING
PROGRAM
The Sub-Contract between PETROMAN and AED having an effective
date of January 1 1994 was executed on February 3 1994 Subsequently AED alo assigned the work of conducting
consumer training for DEOs and SDEOs The work to be undershy
taken by PETROMAN was divided into three phases ie I II and III The Phase-I covered
0 Training need assessment
Development of Wnrkshop curriculum and traiiiing mateiial
N Daita collection for development of field engineers manual
lin Phase-II the Field Engineers Manual was developed while in Phase-III the seven workshops were organized The approach used by PETROMAN for developing and organizing the training program is explained in the following paragraphs
N Phase-I
Training Need Assessment
The training need assessment was the first activity undertaken by PETROMAN for this assignment For this purpose the required questionnaires anti fonats were developed and a five member team of PETROMAN headed by Mr
M N Hussain Chief Counselor visited Quetta during February 27 to March 1 1994 A follow-up visit was also undertaken in the last week of April 1994 in these visits Training Need Assessment questionnaires were completed various officials were interviewed school sites were visited and data for development of field inspection manual was also collected The specimen questionnaire and
interview form is given in Appendix - I IETROMAN faced some difficulty in conipleting the Training Need Assessment questionnaires The interviews with various officials however were very useful and were used as base material for training need assessment The officials interviewed included-
Page No 4
4 iFINAL REPORT
o Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Deputy Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Director Primary Education Development
o Chief Engineer Department of Communication amp Works
(C amp W)
o Technical Advisor C amp W
o Superintendent Engineer C amp W
o Technical Advisor Teacher Training amp Supply PED
o Proiect Manager Engineering Consultant
The PFTROMAN team visited the following School sitesshy
o Government Girls Lady Syndmen School
o Government Girls Model Ifigh School Mission Road
o Government Middle School Police Lirvs
o Government Girls High School Postal Colony
Based on the data collected during the PETROMAN teams
visits and subsequent discussions and communication exchanged with AED officials the following tasks were undertaken
o Establishing the objectives of workshops
o Detei-mining the design and structure of the workshops
o Developing the detailed curriculum (sbjects to be
covered)
o Determining the training methodology to be adopted
o Developing the training material and manuals ie Field Engineers consumer field manual
Page No 5
FINAL REPORT
toThe envisaged training methodology gave due emphasis
and theoretical instructions wereparticipatory style
supplemented with solution of practical problems and field
visits
Phase-II manuals wereThe field eagineers and consumer field
on the data collected during PETROMANscompiled based team visits interviews with officials consultation with
specialists and printed material obtained from various
was finalized after a thoroughsources The draft manual review by the Technical Advisor PED
Phase-III followingUnder the assignment PETROMAN organized the
seven training workshops in Quetta Balochistanshy
9 - 12o Project Management amp Monitoring work-shop May
1994
- 16 1994a Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-III May 31 - June 2 1994
o Consumer Training Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
o Cutisumer Training Workshop-H June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training workshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
Page No 6
an FINAL REPORT
30 TRAINING PROGRAM ITS COVERAE AND PARTICIPATION
The training program organized by PETROMAN corrprised of
following seven training workshops
o Project Management amp Monitoring Workshop May 9 - 12 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14 - 16 11j94
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop- 11 May 31 - Juii 2 1994
o Consumer Traiiiinhig Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
(onsumer Trai iing Workshop-I June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training Wnikshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
In the paragraphs to follow aii overview (f workshops and
their parLicipation is given
31 Project Management amp Monitoring WorkshoLp
This workshop was held in Quetta during May 9 - 12 1994
The workshop was attended by Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers The subjects covered were divided
into two groups In group-I the aspects related to
management motivation and contract management were
covered In group-IL the quantitative asptccts of
construction management were addressed
The management amp contract administration area were
covered by Mr M N lussain General Manager (Planning amp
Coordination) State Petroleum Refining and Petrochemical Corporation (PERAC)
Page No 7
FINAL REPORT
Mr lussain in his presentation first addressed the nature importance and role of motivation in managemerit lHe stressed that motivation is vital for an individual to give his best fie also explained in detail the attitudes and behaviour of employees reflect ing niotivivation or the lack of it lie also presented view pu(ints of leading behavioral scientists about motivation and explained the modes of group behaviour and presented the guidelines and tips for good and effective human relaLions
Mr llussain also gave a detail presentation on contract preparation planning administration and negotiation process Number of sample contracts wer also presented and discussed During the presentation the participants took keen interest and gave their views and reactions on various subjects
The 3rd and 4th study of the workshop was dedicated to (Juantitative aspects of construction management Mr Ubaid Hlasan Akhtar who is working as Assistant Professor at the Civil Engineering Department of NED
University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi conducted this part of the workshop Mr Akhtar after giving an ow(irview of construction management gave a detailed presentation on project monitoring t echniques ie Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Eva i uat ion amp Review Technique (PEampRT) The presentation on CPM dealt with the procedure and application areas of CPM real life problems were also discussed The participants were given exercises for critical path computation and developing CPM for various projects The presentation on PERT gave details of the PERT technique its application and utility Detailed explanation of the concept of probability and normal probability distribution was also presented alongwith a case study
The course material given to the participants alongwith the exercise undertaken by the participants is presented in Volume-Il(a) amp 11(b) of this report
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-III
Page No 8
1FINAL REPORT
32 Field Inspection Workshops As stated earlier three field inspection workshops were organized by PETROMAN during the months of MayJune 1994 The first workshop was held duriing May 14 - 16 1994 while the second workshop was held during May 28 shy30 1994 The third workshop was held ftoji May 31 - June 02 1994 The three workshops were attended by 37 participants All the three workshops weie conducted by Dr S M Makhdumi Chief Counsellor Technical) and Mi Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor Mr Makhdumi holds PHID in Civil Engineering and presently working as Chaiiirman Civil Engineering Department NEI) University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi Mr Khaiii hold a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering and is presently working at NED University of engineering amp Technology Karachi In the first part of the workshop Mr Makhdumi explained various aspects of building drawings their layout and foundation plan the practical problems being faced by the engineers in bu-ilding constrution were alst discussed In the later part of the workshop Dr Makhdumi explaiined the need and priuciples of ihspection and quality control and enforcement of specificat ions liI run-dun of the field inspection manual developed by PETROMAN as part of the assigment was also given (thefield inspection manual is presented inj Volume-II(c) amp 11(d) All the stages of inspection and quality control for a typical building project weire also discussed in tietail Various proformas to be used for inspection purposes were also discussed and views of the participants were obtained
The standards normally employed for construction of buildings were also discussed Dr Makhdumi also apprised the participants about the procedure of est imating preparation of Bill of Quantities (BJQs) and rate analyses for civil works The participants of each workshop visited various school sites The participants of first workshop visited the following sitesshy
o Government Girls High School Pringabad - Mastung
o Government Girls Middle School Shamsabad Mastung-
o Government Girls Primary School Mir Hasan - Mastung
Page No 9
1FINAL REPORT
The Government Middle School Shainsabad - Mastung was completed in 1993 4hile the remaiining two schools were at various stages of construction Dui ig the visit participants physically inspected the building anid gave their views on quality of const1tctLion and ways and means to be employed for further improving the quality of coiistruction The part icipauits iso gavw2 ihe~i views on the availability of constructtion material in the area and the piovince
The participants of seconid and third workshops visited the following school sitesshy
o Government Boys Middle School Machan - Pishin
o Government Buys Middle School Yaroo - Pishin
o Multigrade Girls Primary School Haideir Zai - Pishin
o Gove riment Girls Primary School Pod Gal i Chowk -Quetta
o Government Girls Primary School Saida Varez - Quetta
o Government Boys Primary School Sardar larez - Quetta
o Government Girls High School Irrigiicn Colony -
Quetta
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-lI
33 Consumer Training Workshops PETROMAN as part of the assignment organized three consumer training workshops The first workshop was held from June 04 - 06 1994 while Lile second workshop was held during June 12 -14 1994 The third workshop was organized from June 15 - 17 1994 The three workshops were attend by 65 participants The workshop were organized with the objective of equipping tile District Education Officer and Sub-Division Education Officer with the basic features of buildiiig construction principles of inspection and considering for site selection and buildings takeover
Page No 10
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
FINAL REPORT
o Field testing of all matedials in timely manner and to ensure that they are in compliance with the contract specification
o Accepting or rejecting BOQ work item performed
by the contractor
o Team work and Human Relations
o Improving r ral and Job Commitment
o Monitoring of field progress
o Preparation of measurement book and approval of contractors bill
B CONSUMERS TRAINING FOR DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICERS amp S[)B-DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OFFICERS PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
U To impart training to the DEOs amp SDEOs in oversight responsibilities such as
o Requirements of various types work that iight be undertaken by the directorate of primary Education and the responsibility of all parties to the effective completion of those works
o The process of certification and payment of contractors and the importance of the quality assurance process with specific attention to DEOSDEO responsibilities
o Understanding technical drawings plans and work specifications so that those items requiring checks are monitored and that officers can properly review the site before they sign off on work done and
Page No 2
FINAL REPORT
o Duties obligation and responsibilities of Architectural and Engineering Firms field staff and Directorate of Civil Works Education Department field staff and their powers authority and limits
To impart training in basic field inspection and observation techniques that are within the capacity of educated lay persons (non-engineers)
o Inspection of quality of material and workmianship at various stages of constructiooperatioo
o Knowledge of Bar-Char and monitoring the progress of wotk in the field and
o Team work Motivation commitment and Coordinashytion and other organizations and agencies involvedaffected in the execution of the works
PETRO AN has successfully completed all the activities involved in developing and organizing the training program as per contractual requihwnents and is submitting its final report The report presents the methodology adopted for developing the training program its coverage and participation program effectiveness and evaluation In the end of the report the conclusions and recommendations have been presented
PETROMAN is thankful to AED for assigning the woik and hope that the training program has been able to achieve the designed objectives
PETROMAN also wishes to express its appreciation to officials (if ALD and relevant departments of Governments of Balochistan and NWFP for providing guidance support and assistance during the course of the assignment A special gratitude is also directed to the participants of various workshops for their interest and involvement in various subjects
Page No 3
FINAL REPORT
20 AFOROACHI USED FOR DEVELOPING AND ORGANIZING TIIE TRAINING
PROGRAM
The Sub-Contract between PETROMAN and AED having an effective
date of January 1 1994 was executed on February 3 1994 Subsequently AED alo assigned the work of conducting
consumer training for DEOs and SDEOs The work to be undershy
taken by PETROMAN was divided into three phases ie I II and III The Phase-I covered
0 Training need assessment
Development of Wnrkshop curriculum and traiiiing mateiial
N Daita collection for development of field engineers manual
lin Phase-II the Field Engineers Manual was developed while in Phase-III the seven workshops were organized The approach used by PETROMAN for developing and organizing the training program is explained in the following paragraphs
N Phase-I
Training Need Assessment
The training need assessment was the first activity undertaken by PETROMAN for this assignment For this purpose the required questionnaires anti fonats were developed and a five member team of PETROMAN headed by Mr
M N Hussain Chief Counselor visited Quetta during February 27 to March 1 1994 A follow-up visit was also undertaken in the last week of April 1994 in these visits Training Need Assessment questionnaires were completed various officials were interviewed school sites were visited and data for development of field inspection manual was also collected The specimen questionnaire and
interview form is given in Appendix - I IETROMAN faced some difficulty in conipleting the Training Need Assessment questionnaires The interviews with various officials however were very useful and were used as base material for training need assessment The officials interviewed included-
Page No 4
4 iFINAL REPORT
o Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Deputy Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Director Primary Education Development
o Chief Engineer Department of Communication amp Works
(C amp W)
o Technical Advisor C amp W
o Superintendent Engineer C amp W
o Technical Advisor Teacher Training amp Supply PED
o Proiect Manager Engineering Consultant
The PFTROMAN team visited the following School sitesshy
o Government Girls Lady Syndmen School
o Government Girls Model Ifigh School Mission Road
o Government Middle School Police Lirvs
o Government Girls High School Postal Colony
Based on the data collected during the PETROMAN teams
visits and subsequent discussions and communication exchanged with AED officials the following tasks were undertaken
o Establishing the objectives of workshops
o Detei-mining the design and structure of the workshops
o Developing the detailed curriculum (sbjects to be
covered)
o Determining the training methodology to be adopted
o Developing the training material and manuals ie Field Engineers consumer field manual
Page No 5
FINAL REPORT
toThe envisaged training methodology gave due emphasis
and theoretical instructions wereparticipatory style
supplemented with solution of practical problems and field
visits
Phase-II manuals wereThe field eagineers and consumer field
on the data collected during PETROMANscompiled based team visits interviews with officials consultation with
specialists and printed material obtained from various
was finalized after a thoroughsources The draft manual review by the Technical Advisor PED
Phase-III followingUnder the assignment PETROMAN organized the
seven training workshops in Quetta Balochistanshy
9 - 12o Project Management amp Monitoring work-shop May
1994
- 16 1994a Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-III May 31 - June 2 1994
o Consumer Training Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
o Cutisumer Training Workshop-H June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training workshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
Page No 6
an FINAL REPORT
30 TRAINING PROGRAM ITS COVERAE AND PARTICIPATION
The training program organized by PETROMAN corrprised of
following seven training workshops
o Project Management amp Monitoring Workshop May 9 - 12 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14 - 16 11j94
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop- 11 May 31 - Juii 2 1994
o Consumer Traiiiinhig Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
(onsumer Trai iing Workshop-I June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training Wnikshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
In the paragraphs to follow aii overview (f workshops and
their parLicipation is given
31 Project Management amp Monitoring WorkshoLp
This workshop was held in Quetta during May 9 - 12 1994
The workshop was attended by Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers The subjects covered were divided
into two groups In group-I the aspects related to
management motivation and contract management were
covered In group-IL the quantitative asptccts of
construction management were addressed
The management amp contract administration area were
covered by Mr M N lussain General Manager (Planning amp
Coordination) State Petroleum Refining and Petrochemical Corporation (PERAC)
Page No 7
FINAL REPORT
Mr lussain in his presentation first addressed the nature importance and role of motivation in managemerit lHe stressed that motivation is vital for an individual to give his best fie also explained in detail the attitudes and behaviour of employees reflect ing niotivivation or the lack of it lie also presented view pu(ints of leading behavioral scientists about motivation and explained the modes of group behaviour and presented the guidelines and tips for good and effective human relaLions
Mr llussain also gave a detail presentation on contract preparation planning administration and negotiation process Number of sample contracts wer also presented and discussed During the presentation the participants took keen interest and gave their views and reactions on various subjects
The 3rd and 4th study of the workshop was dedicated to (Juantitative aspects of construction management Mr Ubaid Hlasan Akhtar who is working as Assistant Professor at the Civil Engineering Department of NED
University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi conducted this part of the workshop Mr Akhtar after giving an ow(irview of construction management gave a detailed presentation on project monitoring t echniques ie Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Eva i uat ion amp Review Technique (PEampRT) The presentation on CPM dealt with the procedure and application areas of CPM real life problems were also discussed The participants were given exercises for critical path computation and developing CPM for various projects The presentation on PERT gave details of the PERT technique its application and utility Detailed explanation of the concept of probability and normal probability distribution was also presented alongwith a case study
The course material given to the participants alongwith the exercise undertaken by the participants is presented in Volume-Il(a) amp 11(b) of this report
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-III
Page No 8
1FINAL REPORT
32 Field Inspection Workshops As stated earlier three field inspection workshops were organized by PETROMAN during the months of MayJune 1994 The first workshop was held duriing May 14 - 16 1994 while the second workshop was held during May 28 shy30 1994 The third workshop was held ftoji May 31 - June 02 1994 The three workshops were attended by 37 participants All the three workshops weie conducted by Dr S M Makhdumi Chief Counsellor Technical) and Mi Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor Mr Makhdumi holds PHID in Civil Engineering and presently working as Chaiiirman Civil Engineering Department NEI) University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi Mr Khaiii hold a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering and is presently working at NED University of engineering amp Technology Karachi In the first part of the workshop Mr Makhdumi explained various aspects of building drawings their layout and foundation plan the practical problems being faced by the engineers in bu-ilding constrution were alst discussed In the later part of the workshop Dr Makhdumi explaiined the need and priuciples of ihspection and quality control and enforcement of specificat ions liI run-dun of the field inspection manual developed by PETROMAN as part of the assigment was also given (thefield inspection manual is presented inj Volume-II(c) amp 11(d) All the stages of inspection and quality control for a typical building project weire also discussed in tietail Various proformas to be used for inspection purposes were also discussed and views of the participants were obtained
The standards normally employed for construction of buildings were also discussed Dr Makhdumi also apprised the participants about the procedure of est imating preparation of Bill of Quantities (BJQs) and rate analyses for civil works The participants of each workshop visited various school sites The participants of first workshop visited the following sitesshy
o Government Girls High School Pringabad - Mastung
o Government Girls Middle School Shamsabad Mastung-
o Government Girls Primary School Mir Hasan - Mastung
Page No 9
1FINAL REPORT
The Government Middle School Shainsabad - Mastung was completed in 1993 4hile the remaiining two schools were at various stages of construction Dui ig the visit participants physically inspected the building anid gave their views on quality of const1tctLion and ways and means to be employed for further improving the quality of coiistruction The part icipauits iso gavw2 ihe~i views on the availability of constructtion material in the area and the piovince
The participants of seconid and third workshops visited the following school sitesshy
o Government Boys Middle School Machan - Pishin
o Government Buys Middle School Yaroo - Pishin
o Multigrade Girls Primary School Haideir Zai - Pishin
o Gove riment Girls Primary School Pod Gal i Chowk -Quetta
o Government Girls Primary School Saida Varez - Quetta
o Government Boys Primary School Sardar larez - Quetta
o Government Girls High School Irrigiicn Colony -
Quetta
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-lI
33 Consumer Training Workshops PETROMAN as part of the assignment organized three consumer training workshops The first workshop was held from June 04 - 06 1994 while Lile second workshop was held during June 12 -14 1994 The third workshop was organized from June 15 - 17 1994 The three workshops were attend by 65 participants The workshop were organized with the objective of equipping tile District Education Officer and Sub-Division Education Officer with the basic features of buildiiig construction principles of inspection and considering for site selection and buildings takeover
Page No 10
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
FINAL REPORT
o Duties obligation and responsibilities of Architectural and Engineering Firms field staff and Directorate of Civil Works Education Department field staff and their powers authority and limits
To impart training in basic field inspection and observation techniques that are within the capacity of educated lay persons (non-engineers)
o Inspection of quality of material and workmianship at various stages of constructiooperatioo
o Knowledge of Bar-Char and monitoring the progress of wotk in the field and
o Team work Motivation commitment and Coordinashytion and other organizations and agencies involvedaffected in the execution of the works
PETRO AN has successfully completed all the activities involved in developing and organizing the training program as per contractual requihwnents and is submitting its final report The report presents the methodology adopted for developing the training program its coverage and participation program effectiveness and evaluation In the end of the report the conclusions and recommendations have been presented
PETROMAN is thankful to AED for assigning the woik and hope that the training program has been able to achieve the designed objectives
PETROMAN also wishes to express its appreciation to officials (if ALD and relevant departments of Governments of Balochistan and NWFP for providing guidance support and assistance during the course of the assignment A special gratitude is also directed to the participants of various workshops for their interest and involvement in various subjects
Page No 3
FINAL REPORT
20 AFOROACHI USED FOR DEVELOPING AND ORGANIZING TIIE TRAINING
PROGRAM
The Sub-Contract between PETROMAN and AED having an effective
date of January 1 1994 was executed on February 3 1994 Subsequently AED alo assigned the work of conducting
consumer training for DEOs and SDEOs The work to be undershy
taken by PETROMAN was divided into three phases ie I II and III The Phase-I covered
0 Training need assessment
Development of Wnrkshop curriculum and traiiiing mateiial
N Daita collection for development of field engineers manual
lin Phase-II the Field Engineers Manual was developed while in Phase-III the seven workshops were organized The approach used by PETROMAN for developing and organizing the training program is explained in the following paragraphs
N Phase-I
Training Need Assessment
The training need assessment was the first activity undertaken by PETROMAN for this assignment For this purpose the required questionnaires anti fonats were developed and a five member team of PETROMAN headed by Mr
M N Hussain Chief Counselor visited Quetta during February 27 to March 1 1994 A follow-up visit was also undertaken in the last week of April 1994 in these visits Training Need Assessment questionnaires were completed various officials were interviewed school sites were visited and data for development of field inspection manual was also collected The specimen questionnaire and
interview form is given in Appendix - I IETROMAN faced some difficulty in conipleting the Training Need Assessment questionnaires The interviews with various officials however were very useful and were used as base material for training need assessment The officials interviewed included-
Page No 4
4 iFINAL REPORT
o Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Deputy Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Director Primary Education Development
o Chief Engineer Department of Communication amp Works
(C amp W)
o Technical Advisor C amp W
o Superintendent Engineer C amp W
o Technical Advisor Teacher Training amp Supply PED
o Proiect Manager Engineering Consultant
The PFTROMAN team visited the following School sitesshy
o Government Girls Lady Syndmen School
o Government Girls Model Ifigh School Mission Road
o Government Middle School Police Lirvs
o Government Girls High School Postal Colony
Based on the data collected during the PETROMAN teams
visits and subsequent discussions and communication exchanged with AED officials the following tasks were undertaken
o Establishing the objectives of workshops
o Detei-mining the design and structure of the workshops
o Developing the detailed curriculum (sbjects to be
covered)
o Determining the training methodology to be adopted
o Developing the training material and manuals ie Field Engineers consumer field manual
Page No 5
FINAL REPORT
toThe envisaged training methodology gave due emphasis
and theoretical instructions wereparticipatory style
supplemented with solution of practical problems and field
visits
Phase-II manuals wereThe field eagineers and consumer field
on the data collected during PETROMANscompiled based team visits interviews with officials consultation with
specialists and printed material obtained from various
was finalized after a thoroughsources The draft manual review by the Technical Advisor PED
Phase-III followingUnder the assignment PETROMAN organized the
seven training workshops in Quetta Balochistanshy
9 - 12o Project Management amp Monitoring work-shop May
1994
- 16 1994a Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-III May 31 - June 2 1994
o Consumer Training Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
o Cutisumer Training Workshop-H June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training workshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
Page No 6
an FINAL REPORT
30 TRAINING PROGRAM ITS COVERAE AND PARTICIPATION
The training program organized by PETROMAN corrprised of
following seven training workshops
o Project Management amp Monitoring Workshop May 9 - 12 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14 - 16 11j94
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop- 11 May 31 - Juii 2 1994
o Consumer Traiiiinhig Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
(onsumer Trai iing Workshop-I June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training Wnikshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
In the paragraphs to follow aii overview (f workshops and
their parLicipation is given
31 Project Management amp Monitoring WorkshoLp
This workshop was held in Quetta during May 9 - 12 1994
The workshop was attended by Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers The subjects covered were divided
into two groups In group-I the aspects related to
management motivation and contract management were
covered In group-IL the quantitative asptccts of
construction management were addressed
The management amp contract administration area were
covered by Mr M N lussain General Manager (Planning amp
Coordination) State Petroleum Refining and Petrochemical Corporation (PERAC)
Page No 7
FINAL REPORT
Mr lussain in his presentation first addressed the nature importance and role of motivation in managemerit lHe stressed that motivation is vital for an individual to give his best fie also explained in detail the attitudes and behaviour of employees reflect ing niotivivation or the lack of it lie also presented view pu(ints of leading behavioral scientists about motivation and explained the modes of group behaviour and presented the guidelines and tips for good and effective human relaLions
Mr llussain also gave a detail presentation on contract preparation planning administration and negotiation process Number of sample contracts wer also presented and discussed During the presentation the participants took keen interest and gave their views and reactions on various subjects
The 3rd and 4th study of the workshop was dedicated to (Juantitative aspects of construction management Mr Ubaid Hlasan Akhtar who is working as Assistant Professor at the Civil Engineering Department of NED
University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi conducted this part of the workshop Mr Akhtar after giving an ow(irview of construction management gave a detailed presentation on project monitoring t echniques ie Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Eva i uat ion amp Review Technique (PEampRT) The presentation on CPM dealt with the procedure and application areas of CPM real life problems were also discussed The participants were given exercises for critical path computation and developing CPM for various projects The presentation on PERT gave details of the PERT technique its application and utility Detailed explanation of the concept of probability and normal probability distribution was also presented alongwith a case study
The course material given to the participants alongwith the exercise undertaken by the participants is presented in Volume-Il(a) amp 11(b) of this report
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-III
Page No 8
1FINAL REPORT
32 Field Inspection Workshops As stated earlier three field inspection workshops were organized by PETROMAN during the months of MayJune 1994 The first workshop was held duriing May 14 - 16 1994 while the second workshop was held during May 28 shy30 1994 The third workshop was held ftoji May 31 - June 02 1994 The three workshops were attended by 37 participants All the three workshops weie conducted by Dr S M Makhdumi Chief Counsellor Technical) and Mi Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor Mr Makhdumi holds PHID in Civil Engineering and presently working as Chaiiirman Civil Engineering Department NEI) University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi Mr Khaiii hold a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering and is presently working at NED University of engineering amp Technology Karachi In the first part of the workshop Mr Makhdumi explained various aspects of building drawings their layout and foundation plan the practical problems being faced by the engineers in bu-ilding constrution were alst discussed In the later part of the workshop Dr Makhdumi explaiined the need and priuciples of ihspection and quality control and enforcement of specificat ions liI run-dun of the field inspection manual developed by PETROMAN as part of the assigment was also given (thefield inspection manual is presented inj Volume-II(c) amp 11(d) All the stages of inspection and quality control for a typical building project weire also discussed in tietail Various proformas to be used for inspection purposes were also discussed and views of the participants were obtained
The standards normally employed for construction of buildings were also discussed Dr Makhdumi also apprised the participants about the procedure of est imating preparation of Bill of Quantities (BJQs) and rate analyses for civil works The participants of each workshop visited various school sites The participants of first workshop visited the following sitesshy
o Government Girls High School Pringabad - Mastung
o Government Girls Middle School Shamsabad Mastung-
o Government Girls Primary School Mir Hasan - Mastung
Page No 9
1FINAL REPORT
The Government Middle School Shainsabad - Mastung was completed in 1993 4hile the remaiining two schools were at various stages of construction Dui ig the visit participants physically inspected the building anid gave their views on quality of const1tctLion and ways and means to be employed for further improving the quality of coiistruction The part icipauits iso gavw2 ihe~i views on the availability of constructtion material in the area and the piovince
The participants of seconid and third workshops visited the following school sitesshy
o Government Boys Middle School Machan - Pishin
o Government Buys Middle School Yaroo - Pishin
o Multigrade Girls Primary School Haideir Zai - Pishin
o Gove riment Girls Primary School Pod Gal i Chowk -Quetta
o Government Girls Primary School Saida Varez - Quetta
o Government Boys Primary School Sardar larez - Quetta
o Government Girls High School Irrigiicn Colony -
Quetta
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-lI
33 Consumer Training Workshops PETROMAN as part of the assignment organized three consumer training workshops The first workshop was held from June 04 - 06 1994 while Lile second workshop was held during June 12 -14 1994 The third workshop was organized from June 15 - 17 1994 The three workshops were attend by 65 participants The workshop were organized with the objective of equipping tile District Education Officer and Sub-Division Education Officer with the basic features of buildiiig construction principles of inspection and considering for site selection and buildings takeover
Page No 10
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
FINAL REPORT
20 AFOROACHI USED FOR DEVELOPING AND ORGANIZING TIIE TRAINING
PROGRAM
The Sub-Contract between PETROMAN and AED having an effective
date of January 1 1994 was executed on February 3 1994 Subsequently AED alo assigned the work of conducting
consumer training for DEOs and SDEOs The work to be undershy
taken by PETROMAN was divided into three phases ie I II and III The Phase-I covered
0 Training need assessment
Development of Wnrkshop curriculum and traiiiing mateiial
N Daita collection for development of field engineers manual
lin Phase-II the Field Engineers Manual was developed while in Phase-III the seven workshops were organized The approach used by PETROMAN for developing and organizing the training program is explained in the following paragraphs
N Phase-I
Training Need Assessment
The training need assessment was the first activity undertaken by PETROMAN for this assignment For this purpose the required questionnaires anti fonats were developed and a five member team of PETROMAN headed by Mr
M N Hussain Chief Counselor visited Quetta during February 27 to March 1 1994 A follow-up visit was also undertaken in the last week of April 1994 in these visits Training Need Assessment questionnaires were completed various officials were interviewed school sites were visited and data for development of field inspection manual was also collected The specimen questionnaire and
interview form is given in Appendix - I IETROMAN faced some difficulty in conipleting the Training Need Assessment questionnaires The interviews with various officials however were very useful and were used as base material for training need assessment The officials interviewed included-
Page No 4
4 iFINAL REPORT
o Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Deputy Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Director Primary Education Development
o Chief Engineer Department of Communication amp Works
(C amp W)
o Technical Advisor C amp W
o Superintendent Engineer C amp W
o Technical Advisor Teacher Training amp Supply PED
o Proiect Manager Engineering Consultant
The PFTROMAN team visited the following School sitesshy
o Government Girls Lady Syndmen School
o Government Girls Model Ifigh School Mission Road
o Government Middle School Police Lirvs
o Government Girls High School Postal Colony
Based on the data collected during the PETROMAN teams
visits and subsequent discussions and communication exchanged with AED officials the following tasks were undertaken
o Establishing the objectives of workshops
o Detei-mining the design and structure of the workshops
o Developing the detailed curriculum (sbjects to be
covered)
o Determining the training methodology to be adopted
o Developing the training material and manuals ie Field Engineers consumer field manual
Page No 5
FINAL REPORT
toThe envisaged training methodology gave due emphasis
and theoretical instructions wereparticipatory style
supplemented with solution of practical problems and field
visits
Phase-II manuals wereThe field eagineers and consumer field
on the data collected during PETROMANscompiled based team visits interviews with officials consultation with
specialists and printed material obtained from various
was finalized after a thoroughsources The draft manual review by the Technical Advisor PED
Phase-III followingUnder the assignment PETROMAN organized the
seven training workshops in Quetta Balochistanshy
9 - 12o Project Management amp Monitoring work-shop May
1994
- 16 1994a Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-III May 31 - June 2 1994
o Consumer Training Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
o Cutisumer Training Workshop-H June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training workshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
Page No 6
an FINAL REPORT
30 TRAINING PROGRAM ITS COVERAE AND PARTICIPATION
The training program organized by PETROMAN corrprised of
following seven training workshops
o Project Management amp Monitoring Workshop May 9 - 12 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14 - 16 11j94
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop- 11 May 31 - Juii 2 1994
o Consumer Traiiiinhig Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
(onsumer Trai iing Workshop-I June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training Wnikshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
In the paragraphs to follow aii overview (f workshops and
their parLicipation is given
31 Project Management amp Monitoring WorkshoLp
This workshop was held in Quetta during May 9 - 12 1994
The workshop was attended by Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers The subjects covered were divided
into two groups In group-I the aspects related to
management motivation and contract management were
covered In group-IL the quantitative asptccts of
construction management were addressed
The management amp contract administration area were
covered by Mr M N lussain General Manager (Planning amp
Coordination) State Petroleum Refining and Petrochemical Corporation (PERAC)
Page No 7
FINAL REPORT
Mr lussain in his presentation first addressed the nature importance and role of motivation in managemerit lHe stressed that motivation is vital for an individual to give his best fie also explained in detail the attitudes and behaviour of employees reflect ing niotivivation or the lack of it lie also presented view pu(ints of leading behavioral scientists about motivation and explained the modes of group behaviour and presented the guidelines and tips for good and effective human relaLions
Mr llussain also gave a detail presentation on contract preparation planning administration and negotiation process Number of sample contracts wer also presented and discussed During the presentation the participants took keen interest and gave their views and reactions on various subjects
The 3rd and 4th study of the workshop was dedicated to (Juantitative aspects of construction management Mr Ubaid Hlasan Akhtar who is working as Assistant Professor at the Civil Engineering Department of NED
University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi conducted this part of the workshop Mr Akhtar after giving an ow(irview of construction management gave a detailed presentation on project monitoring t echniques ie Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Eva i uat ion amp Review Technique (PEampRT) The presentation on CPM dealt with the procedure and application areas of CPM real life problems were also discussed The participants were given exercises for critical path computation and developing CPM for various projects The presentation on PERT gave details of the PERT technique its application and utility Detailed explanation of the concept of probability and normal probability distribution was also presented alongwith a case study
The course material given to the participants alongwith the exercise undertaken by the participants is presented in Volume-Il(a) amp 11(b) of this report
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-III
Page No 8
1FINAL REPORT
32 Field Inspection Workshops As stated earlier three field inspection workshops were organized by PETROMAN during the months of MayJune 1994 The first workshop was held duriing May 14 - 16 1994 while the second workshop was held during May 28 shy30 1994 The third workshop was held ftoji May 31 - June 02 1994 The three workshops were attended by 37 participants All the three workshops weie conducted by Dr S M Makhdumi Chief Counsellor Technical) and Mi Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor Mr Makhdumi holds PHID in Civil Engineering and presently working as Chaiiirman Civil Engineering Department NEI) University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi Mr Khaiii hold a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering and is presently working at NED University of engineering amp Technology Karachi In the first part of the workshop Mr Makhdumi explained various aspects of building drawings their layout and foundation plan the practical problems being faced by the engineers in bu-ilding constrution were alst discussed In the later part of the workshop Dr Makhdumi explaiined the need and priuciples of ihspection and quality control and enforcement of specificat ions liI run-dun of the field inspection manual developed by PETROMAN as part of the assigment was also given (thefield inspection manual is presented inj Volume-II(c) amp 11(d) All the stages of inspection and quality control for a typical building project weire also discussed in tietail Various proformas to be used for inspection purposes were also discussed and views of the participants were obtained
The standards normally employed for construction of buildings were also discussed Dr Makhdumi also apprised the participants about the procedure of est imating preparation of Bill of Quantities (BJQs) and rate analyses for civil works The participants of each workshop visited various school sites The participants of first workshop visited the following sitesshy
o Government Girls High School Pringabad - Mastung
o Government Girls Middle School Shamsabad Mastung-
o Government Girls Primary School Mir Hasan - Mastung
Page No 9
1FINAL REPORT
The Government Middle School Shainsabad - Mastung was completed in 1993 4hile the remaiining two schools were at various stages of construction Dui ig the visit participants physically inspected the building anid gave their views on quality of const1tctLion and ways and means to be employed for further improving the quality of coiistruction The part icipauits iso gavw2 ihe~i views on the availability of constructtion material in the area and the piovince
The participants of seconid and third workshops visited the following school sitesshy
o Government Boys Middle School Machan - Pishin
o Government Buys Middle School Yaroo - Pishin
o Multigrade Girls Primary School Haideir Zai - Pishin
o Gove riment Girls Primary School Pod Gal i Chowk -Quetta
o Government Girls Primary School Saida Varez - Quetta
o Government Boys Primary School Sardar larez - Quetta
o Government Girls High School Irrigiicn Colony -
Quetta
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-lI
33 Consumer Training Workshops PETROMAN as part of the assignment organized three consumer training workshops The first workshop was held from June 04 - 06 1994 while Lile second workshop was held during June 12 -14 1994 The third workshop was organized from June 15 - 17 1994 The three workshops were attend by 65 participants The workshop were organized with the objective of equipping tile District Education Officer and Sub-Division Education Officer with the basic features of buildiiig construction principles of inspection and considering for site selection and buildings takeover
Page No 10
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
4 iFINAL REPORT
o Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Deputy Secretary Education Government of Balochistan
o Director Primary Education Development
o Chief Engineer Department of Communication amp Works
(C amp W)
o Technical Advisor C amp W
o Superintendent Engineer C amp W
o Technical Advisor Teacher Training amp Supply PED
o Proiect Manager Engineering Consultant
The PFTROMAN team visited the following School sitesshy
o Government Girls Lady Syndmen School
o Government Girls Model Ifigh School Mission Road
o Government Middle School Police Lirvs
o Government Girls High School Postal Colony
Based on the data collected during the PETROMAN teams
visits and subsequent discussions and communication exchanged with AED officials the following tasks were undertaken
o Establishing the objectives of workshops
o Detei-mining the design and structure of the workshops
o Developing the detailed curriculum (sbjects to be
covered)
o Determining the training methodology to be adopted
o Developing the training material and manuals ie Field Engineers consumer field manual
Page No 5
FINAL REPORT
toThe envisaged training methodology gave due emphasis
and theoretical instructions wereparticipatory style
supplemented with solution of practical problems and field
visits
Phase-II manuals wereThe field eagineers and consumer field
on the data collected during PETROMANscompiled based team visits interviews with officials consultation with
specialists and printed material obtained from various
was finalized after a thoroughsources The draft manual review by the Technical Advisor PED
Phase-III followingUnder the assignment PETROMAN organized the
seven training workshops in Quetta Balochistanshy
9 - 12o Project Management amp Monitoring work-shop May
1994
- 16 1994a Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-III May 31 - June 2 1994
o Consumer Training Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
o Cutisumer Training Workshop-H June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training workshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
Page No 6
an FINAL REPORT
30 TRAINING PROGRAM ITS COVERAE AND PARTICIPATION
The training program organized by PETROMAN corrprised of
following seven training workshops
o Project Management amp Monitoring Workshop May 9 - 12 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14 - 16 11j94
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop- 11 May 31 - Juii 2 1994
o Consumer Traiiiinhig Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
(onsumer Trai iing Workshop-I June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training Wnikshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
In the paragraphs to follow aii overview (f workshops and
their parLicipation is given
31 Project Management amp Monitoring WorkshoLp
This workshop was held in Quetta during May 9 - 12 1994
The workshop was attended by Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers The subjects covered were divided
into two groups In group-I the aspects related to
management motivation and contract management were
covered In group-IL the quantitative asptccts of
construction management were addressed
The management amp contract administration area were
covered by Mr M N lussain General Manager (Planning amp
Coordination) State Petroleum Refining and Petrochemical Corporation (PERAC)
Page No 7
FINAL REPORT
Mr lussain in his presentation first addressed the nature importance and role of motivation in managemerit lHe stressed that motivation is vital for an individual to give his best fie also explained in detail the attitudes and behaviour of employees reflect ing niotivivation or the lack of it lie also presented view pu(ints of leading behavioral scientists about motivation and explained the modes of group behaviour and presented the guidelines and tips for good and effective human relaLions
Mr llussain also gave a detail presentation on contract preparation planning administration and negotiation process Number of sample contracts wer also presented and discussed During the presentation the participants took keen interest and gave their views and reactions on various subjects
The 3rd and 4th study of the workshop was dedicated to (Juantitative aspects of construction management Mr Ubaid Hlasan Akhtar who is working as Assistant Professor at the Civil Engineering Department of NED
University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi conducted this part of the workshop Mr Akhtar after giving an ow(irview of construction management gave a detailed presentation on project monitoring t echniques ie Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Eva i uat ion amp Review Technique (PEampRT) The presentation on CPM dealt with the procedure and application areas of CPM real life problems were also discussed The participants were given exercises for critical path computation and developing CPM for various projects The presentation on PERT gave details of the PERT technique its application and utility Detailed explanation of the concept of probability and normal probability distribution was also presented alongwith a case study
The course material given to the participants alongwith the exercise undertaken by the participants is presented in Volume-Il(a) amp 11(b) of this report
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-III
Page No 8
1FINAL REPORT
32 Field Inspection Workshops As stated earlier three field inspection workshops were organized by PETROMAN during the months of MayJune 1994 The first workshop was held duriing May 14 - 16 1994 while the second workshop was held during May 28 shy30 1994 The third workshop was held ftoji May 31 - June 02 1994 The three workshops were attended by 37 participants All the three workshops weie conducted by Dr S M Makhdumi Chief Counsellor Technical) and Mi Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor Mr Makhdumi holds PHID in Civil Engineering and presently working as Chaiiirman Civil Engineering Department NEI) University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi Mr Khaiii hold a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering and is presently working at NED University of engineering amp Technology Karachi In the first part of the workshop Mr Makhdumi explained various aspects of building drawings their layout and foundation plan the practical problems being faced by the engineers in bu-ilding constrution were alst discussed In the later part of the workshop Dr Makhdumi explaiined the need and priuciples of ihspection and quality control and enforcement of specificat ions liI run-dun of the field inspection manual developed by PETROMAN as part of the assigment was also given (thefield inspection manual is presented inj Volume-II(c) amp 11(d) All the stages of inspection and quality control for a typical building project weire also discussed in tietail Various proformas to be used for inspection purposes were also discussed and views of the participants were obtained
The standards normally employed for construction of buildings were also discussed Dr Makhdumi also apprised the participants about the procedure of est imating preparation of Bill of Quantities (BJQs) and rate analyses for civil works The participants of each workshop visited various school sites The participants of first workshop visited the following sitesshy
o Government Girls High School Pringabad - Mastung
o Government Girls Middle School Shamsabad Mastung-
o Government Girls Primary School Mir Hasan - Mastung
Page No 9
1FINAL REPORT
The Government Middle School Shainsabad - Mastung was completed in 1993 4hile the remaiining two schools were at various stages of construction Dui ig the visit participants physically inspected the building anid gave their views on quality of const1tctLion and ways and means to be employed for further improving the quality of coiistruction The part icipauits iso gavw2 ihe~i views on the availability of constructtion material in the area and the piovince
The participants of seconid and third workshops visited the following school sitesshy
o Government Boys Middle School Machan - Pishin
o Government Buys Middle School Yaroo - Pishin
o Multigrade Girls Primary School Haideir Zai - Pishin
o Gove riment Girls Primary School Pod Gal i Chowk -Quetta
o Government Girls Primary School Saida Varez - Quetta
o Government Boys Primary School Sardar larez - Quetta
o Government Girls High School Irrigiicn Colony -
Quetta
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-lI
33 Consumer Training Workshops PETROMAN as part of the assignment organized three consumer training workshops The first workshop was held from June 04 - 06 1994 while Lile second workshop was held during June 12 -14 1994 The third workshop was organized from June 15 - 17 1994 The three workshops were attend by 65 participants The workshop were organized with the objective of equipping tile District Education Officer and Sub-Division Education Officer with the basic features of buildiiig construction principles of inspection and considering for site selection and buildings takeover
Page No 10
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
FINAL REPORT
toThe envisaged training methodology gave due emphasis
and theoretical instructions wereparticipatory style
supplemented with solution of practical problems and field
visits
Phase-II manuals wereThe field eagineers and consumer field
on the data collected during PETROMANscompiled based team visits interviews with officials consultation with
specialists and printed material obtained from various
was finalized after a thoroughsources The draft manual review by the Technical Advisor PED
Phase-III followingUnder the assignment PETROMAN organized the
seven training workshops in Quetta Balochistanshy
9 - 12o Project Management amp Monitoring work-shop May
1994
- 16 1994a Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-III May 31 - June 2 1994
o Consumer Training Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
o Cutisumer Training Workshop-H June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training workshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
Page No 6
an FINAL REPORT
30 TRAINING PROGRAM ITS COVERAE AND PARTICIPATION
The training program organized by PETROMAN corrprised of
following seven training workshops
o Project Management amp Monitoring Workshop May 9 - 12 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14 - 16 11j94
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop- 11 May 31 - Juii 2 1994
o Consumer Traiiiinhig Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
(onsumer Trai iing Workshop-I June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training Wnikshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
In the paragraphs to follow aii overview (f workshops and
their parLicipation is given
31 Project Management amp Monitoring WorkshoLp
This workshop was held in Quetta during May 9 - 12 1994
The workshop was attended by Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers The subjects covered were divided
into two groups In group-I the aspects related to
management motivation and contract management were
covered In group-IL the quantitative asptccts of
construction management were addressed
The management amp contract administration area were
covered by Mr M N lussain General Manager (Planning amp
Coordination) State Petroleum Refining and Petrochemical Corporation (PERAC)
Page No 7
FINAL REPORT
Mr lussain in his presentation first addressed the nature importance and role of motivation in managemerit lHe stressed that motivation is vital for an individual to give his best fie also explained in detail the attitudes and behaviour of employees reflect ing niotivivation or the lack of it lie also presented view pu(ints of leading behavioral scientists about motivation and explained the modes of group behaviour and presented the guidelines and tips for good and effective human relaLions
Mr llussain also gave a detail presentation on contract preparation planning administration and negotiation process Number of sample contracts wer also presented and discussed During the presentation the participants took keen interest and gave their views and reactions on various subjects
The 3rd and 4th study of the workshop was dedicated to (Juantitative aspects of construction management Mr Ubaid Hlasan Akhtar who is working as Assistant Professor at the Civil Engineering Department of NED
University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi conducted this part of the workshop Mr Akhtar after giving an ow(irview of construction management gave a detailed presentation on project monitoring t echniques ie Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Eva i uat ion amp Review Technique (PEampRT) The presentation on CPM dealt with the procedure and application areas of CPM real life problems were also discussed The participants were given exercises for critical path computation and developing CPM for various projects The presentation on PERT gave details of the PERT technique its application and utility Detailed explanation of the concept of probability and normal probability distribution was also presented alongwith a case study
The course material given to the participants alongwith the exercise undertaken by the participants is presented in Volume-Il(a) amp 11(b) of this report
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-III
Page No 8
1FINAL REPORT
32 Field Inspection Workshops As stated earlier three field inspection workshops were organized by PETROMAN during the months of MayJune 1994 The first workshop was held duriing May 14 - 16 1994 while the second workshop was held during May 28 shy30 1994 The third workshop was held ftoji May 31 - June 02 1994 The three workshops were attended by 37 participants All the three workshops weie conducted by Dr S M Makhdumi Chief Counsellor Technical) and Mi Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor Mr Makhdumi holds PHID in Civil Engineering and presently working as Chaiiirman Civil Engineering Department NEI) University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi Mr Khaiii hold a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering and is presently working at NED University of engineering amp Technology Karachi In the first part of the workshop Mr Makhdumi explained various aspects of building drawings their layout and foundation plan the practical problems being faced by the engineers in bu-ilding constrution were alst discussed In the later part of the workshop Dr Makhdumi explaiined the need and priuciples of ihspection and quality control and enforcement of specificat ions liI run-dun of the field inspection manual developed by PETROMAN as part of the assigment was also given (thefield inspection manual is presented inj Volume-II(c) amp 11(d) All the stages of inspection and quality control for a typical building project weire also discussed in tietail Various proformas to be used for inspection purposes were also discussed and views of the participants were obtained
The standards normally employed for construction of buildings were also discussed Dr Makhdumi also apprised the participants about the procedure of est imating preparation of Bill of Quantities (BJQs) and rate analyses for civil works The participants of each workshop visited various school sites The participants of first workshop visited the following sitesshy
o Government Girls High School Pringabad - Mastung
o Government Girls Middle School Shamsabad Mastung-
o Government Girls Primary School Mir Hasan - Mastung
Page No 9
1FINAL REPORT
The Government Middle School Shainsabad - Mastung was completed in 1993 4hile the remaiining two schools were at various stages of construction Dui ig the visit participants physically inspected the building anid gave their views on quality of const1tctLion and ways and means to be employed for further improving the quality of coiistruction The part icipauits iso gavw2 ihe~i views on the availability of constructtion material in the area and the piovince
The participants of seconid and third workshops visited the following school sitesshy
o Government Boys Middle School Machan - Pishin
o Government Buys Middle School Yaroo - Pishin
o Multigrade Girls Primary School Haideir Zai - Pishin
o Gove riment Girls Primary School Pod Gal i Chowk -Quetta
o Government Girls Primary School Saida Varez - Quetta
o Government Boys Primary School Sardar larez - Quetta
o Government Girls High School Irrigiicn Colony -
Quetta
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-lI
33 Consumer Training Workshops PETROMAN as part of the assignment organized three consumer training workshops The first workshop was held from June 04 - 06 1994 while Lile second workshop was held during June 12 -14 1994 The third workshop was organized from June 15 - 17 1994 The three workshops were attend by 65 participants The workshop were organized with the objective of equipping tile District Education Officer and Sub-Division Education Officer with the basic features of buildiiig construction principles of inspection and considering for site selection and buildings takeover
Page No 10
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
an FINAL REPORT
30 TRAINING PROGRAM ITS COVERAE AND PARTICIPATION
The training program organized by PETROMAN corrprised of
following seven training workshops
o Project Management amp Monitoring Workshop May 9 - 12 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop-I May 14 - 16 11j94
o Field Inspection Workshop-Il May 28 - 30 1994
o Field Inspection Workshop- 11 May 31 - Juii 2 1994
o Consumer Traiiiinhig Workshop-I June 4 - 6 1994
(onsumer Trai iing Workshop-I June 12 - 14 1994
o Consumer Training Wnikshop-III June 15 - 17 1994
In the paragraphs to follow aii overview (f workshops and
their parLicipation is given
31 Project Management amp Monitoring WorkshoLp
This workshop was held in Quetta during May 9 - 12 1994
The workshop was attended by Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers The subjects covered were divided
into two groups In group-I the aspects related to
management motivation and contract management were
covered In group-IL the quantitative asptccts of
construction management were addressed
The management amp contract administration area were
covered by Mr M N lussain General Manager (Planning amp
Coordination) State Petroleum Refining and Petrochemical Corporation (PERAC)
Page No 7
FINAL REPORT
Mr lussain in his presentation first addressed the nature importance and role of motivation in managemerit lHe stressed that motivation is vital for an individual to give his best fie also explained in detail the attitudes and behaviour of employees reflect ing niotivivation or the lack of it lie also presented view pu(ints of leading behavioral scientists about motivation and explained the modes of group behaviour and presented the guidelines and tips for good and effective human relaLions
Mr llussain also gave a detail presentation on contract preparation planning administration and negotiation process Number of sample contracts wer also presented and discussed During the presentation the participants took keen interest and gave their views and reactions on various subjects
The 3rd and 4th study of the workshop was dedicated to (Juantitative aspects of construction management Mr Ubaid Hlasan Akhtar who is working as Assistant Professor at the Civil Engineering Department of NED
University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi conducted this part of the workshop Mr Akhtar after giving an ow(irview of construction management gave a detailed presentation on project monitoring t echniques ie Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Eva i uat ion amp Review Technique (PEampRT) The presentation on CPM dealt with the procedure and application areas of CPM real life problems were also discussed The participants were given exercises for critical path computation and developing CPM for various projects The presentation on PERT gave details of the PERT technique its application and utility Detailed explanation of the concept of probability and normal probability distribution was also presented alongwith a case study
The course material given to the participants alongwith the exercise undertaken by the participants is presented in Volume-Il(a) amp 11(b) of this report
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-III
Page No 8
1FINAL REPORT
32 Field Inspection Workshops As stated earlier three field inspection workshops were organized by PETROMAN during the months of MayJune 1994 The first workshop was held duriing May 14 - 16 1994 while the second workshop was held during May 28 shy30 1994 The third workshop was held ftoji May 31 - June 02 1994 The three workshops were attended by 37 participants All the three workshops weie conducted by Dr S M Makhdumi Chief Counsellor Technical) and Mi Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor Mr Makhdumi holds PHID in Civil Engineering and presently working as Chaiiirman Civil Engineering Department NEI) University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi Mr Khaiii hold a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering and is presently working at NED University of engineering amp Technology Karachi In the first part of the workshop Mr Makhdumi explained various aspects of building drawings their layout and foundation plan the practical problems being faced by the engineers in bu-ilding constrution were alst discussed In the later part of the workshop Dr Makhdumi explaiined the need and priuciples of ihspection and quality control and enforcement of specificat ions liI run-dun of the field inspection manual developed by PETROMAN as part of the assigment was also given (thefield inspection manual is presented inj Volume-II(c) amp 11(d) All the stages of inspection and quality control for a typical building project weire also discussed in tietail Various proformas to be used for inspection purposes were also discussed and views of the participants were obtained
The standards normally employed for construction of buildings were also discussed Dr Makhdumi also apprised the participants about the procedure of est imating preparation of Bill of Quantities (BJQs) and rate analyses for civil works The participants of each workshop visited various school sites The participants of first workshop visited the following sitesshy
o Government Girls High School Pringabad - Mastung
o Government Girls Middle School Shamsabad Mastung-
o Government Girls Primary School Mir Hasan - Mastung
Page No 9
1FINAL REPORT
The Government Middle School Shainsabad - Mastung was completed in 1993 4hile the remaiining two schools were at various stages of construction Dui ig the visit participants physically inspected the building anid gave their views on quality of const1tctLion and ways and means to be employed for further improving the quality of coiistruction The part icipauits iso gavw2 ihe~i views on the availability of constructtion material in the area and the piovince
The participants of seconid and third workshops visited the following school sitesshy
o Government Boys Middle School Machan - Pishin
o Government Buys Middle School Yaroo - Pishin
o Multigrade Girls Primary School Haideir Zai - Pishin
o Gove riment Girls Primary School Pod Gal i Chowk -Quetta
o Government Girls Primary School Saida Varez - Quetta
o Government Boys Primary School Sardar larez - Quetta
o Government Girls High School Irrigiicn Colony -
Quetta
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-lI
33 Consumer Training Workshops PETROMAN as part of the assignment organized three consumer training workshops The first workshop was held from June 04 - 06 1994 while Lile second workshop was held during June 12 -14 1994 The third workshop was organized from June 15 - 17 1994 The three workshops were attend by 65 participants The workshop were organized with the objective of equipping tile District Education Officer and Sub-Division Education Officer with the basic features of buildiiig construction principles of inspection and considering for site selection and buildings takeover
Page No 10
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
FINAL REPORT
Mr lussain in his presentation first addressed the nature importance and role of motivation in managemerit lHe stressed that motivation is vital for an individual to give his best fie also explained in detail the attitudes and behaviour of employees reflect ing niotivivation or the lack of it lie also presented view pu(ints of leading behavioral scientists about motivation and explained the modes of group behaviour and presented the guidelines and tips for good and effective human relaLions
Mr llussain also gave a detail presentation on contract preparation planning administration and negotiation process Number of sample contracts wer also presented and discussed During the presentation the participants took keen interest and gave their views and reactions on various subjects
The 3rd and 4th study of the workshop was dedicated to (Juantitative aspects of construction management Mr Ubaid Hlasan Akhtar who is working as Assistant Professor at the Civil Engineering Department of NED
University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi conducted this part of the workshop Mr Akhtar after giving an ow(irview of construction management gave a detailed presentation on project monitoring t echniques ie Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Eva i uat ion amp Review Technique (PEampRT) The presentation on CPM dealt with the procedure and application areas of CPM real life problems were also discussed The participants were given exercises for critical path computation and developing CPM for various projects The presentation on PERT gave details of the PERT technique its application and utility Detailed explanation of the concept of probability and normal probability distribution was also presented alongwith a case study
The course material given to the participants alongwith the exercise undertaken by the participants is presented in Volume-Il(a) amp 11(b) of this report
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-III
Page No 8
1FINAL REPORT
32 Field Inspection Workshops As stated earlier three field inspection workshops were organized by PETROMAN during the months of MayJune 1994 The first workshop was held duriing May 14 - 16 1994 while the second workshop was held during May 28 shy30 1994 The third workshop was held ftoji May 31 - June 02 1994 The three workshops were attended by 37 participants All the three workshops weie conducted by Dr S M Makhdumi Chief Counsellor Technical) and Mi Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor Mr Makhdumi holds PHID in Civil Engineering and presently working as Chaiiirman Civil Engineering Department NEI) University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi Mr Khaiii hold a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering and is presently working at NED University of engineering amp Technology Karachi In the first part of the workshop Mr Makhdumi explained various aspects of building drawings their layout and foundation plan the practical problems being faced by the engineers in bu-ilding constrution were alst discussed In the later part of the workshop Dr Makhdumi explaiined the need and priuciples of ihspection and quality control and enforcement of specificat ions liI run-dun of the field inspection manual developed by PETROMAN as part of the assigment was also given (thefield inspection manual is presented inj Volume-II(c) amp 11(d) All the stages of inspection and quality control for a typical building project weire also discussed in tietail Various proformas to be used for inspection purposes were also discussed and views of the participants were obtained
The standards normally employed for construction of buildings were also discussed Dr Makhdumi also apprised the participants about the procedure of est imating preparation of Bill of Quantities (BJQs) and rate analyses for civil works The participants of each workshop visited various school sites The participants of first workshop visited the following sitesshy
o Government Girls High School Pringabad - Mastung
o Government Girls Middle School Shamsabad Mastung-
o Government Girls Primary School Mir Hasan - Mastung
Page No 9
1FINAL REPORT
The Government Middle School Shainsabad - Mastung was completed in 1993 4hile the remaiining two schools were at various stages of construction Dui ig the visit participants physically inspected the building anid gave their views on quality of const1tctLion and ways and means to be employed for further improving the quality of coiistruction The part icipauits iso gavw2 ihe~i views on the availability of constructtion material in the area and the piovince
The participants of seconid and third workshops visited the following school sitesshy
o Government Boys Middle School Machan - Pishin
o Government Buys Middle School Yaroo - Pishin
o Multigrade Girls Primary School Haideir Zai - Pishin
o Gove riment Girls Primary School Pod Gal i Chowk -Quetta
o Government Girls Primary School Saida Varez - Quetta
o Government Boys Primary School Sardar larez - Quetta
o Government Girls High School Irrigiicn Colony -
Quetta
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-lI
33 Consumer Training Workshops PETROMAN as part of the assignment organized three consumer training workshops The first workshop was held from June 04 - 06 1994 while Lile second workshop was held during June 12 -14 1994 The third workshop was organized from June 15 - 17 1994 The three workshops were attend by 65 participants The workshop were organized with the objective of equipping tile District Education Officer and Sub-Division Education Officer with the basic features of buildiiig construction principles of inspection and considering for site selection and buildings takeover
Page No 10
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
1FINAL REPORT
32 Field Inspection Workshops As stated earlier three field inspection workshops were organized by PETROMAN during the months of MayJune 1994 The first workshop was held duriing May 14 - 16 1994 while the second workshop was held during May 28 shy30 1994 The third workshop was held ftoji May 31 - June 02 1994 The three workshops were attended by 37 participants All the three workshops weie conducted by Dr S M Makhdumi Chief Counsellor Technical) and Mi Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor Mr Makhdumi holds PHID in Civil Engineering and presently working as Chaiiirman Civil Engineering Department NEI) University of Engineering amp Technology Karachi Mr Khaiii hold a Masters Degree in Civil Engineering and is presently working at NED University of engineering amp Technology Karachi In the first part of the workshop Mr Makhdumi explained various aspects of building drawings their layout and foundation plan the practical problems being faced by the engineers in bu-ilding constrution were alst discussed In the later part of the workshop Dr Makhdumi explaiined the need and priuciples of ihspection and quality control and enforcement of specificat ions liI run-dun of the field inspection manual developed by PETROMAN as part of the assigment was also given (thefield inspection manual is presented inj Volume-II(c) amp 11(d) All the stages of inspection and quality control for a typical building project weire also discussed in tietail Various proformas to be used for inspection purposes were also discussed and views of the participants were obtained
The standards normally employed for construction of buildings were also discussed Dr Makhdumi also apprised the participants about the procedure of est imating preparation of Bill of Quantities (BJQs) and rate analyses for civil works The participants of each workshop visited various school sites The participants of first workshop visited the following sitesshy
o Government Girls High School Pringabad - Mastung
o Government Girls Middle School Shamsabad Mastung-
o Government Girls Primary School Mir Hasan - Mastung
Page No 9
1FINAL REPORT
The Government Middle School Shainsabad - Mastung was completed in 1993 4hile the remaiining two schools were at various stages of construction Dui ig the visit participants physically inspected the building anid gave their views on quality of const1tctLion and ways and means to be employed for further improving the quality of coiistruction The part icipauits iso gavw2 ihe~i views on the availability of constructtion material in the area and the piovince
The participants of seconid and third workshops visited the following school sitesshy
o Government Boys Middle School Machan - Pishin
o Government Buys Middle School Yaroo - Pishin
o Multigrade Girls Primary School Haideir Zai - Pishin
o Gove riment Girls Primary School Pod Gal i Chowk -Quetta
o Government Girls Primary School Saida Varez - Quetta
o Government Boys Primary School Sardar larez - Quetta
o Government Girls High School Irrigiicn Colony -
Quetta
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-lI
33 Consumer Training Workshops PETROMAN as part of the assignment organized three consumer training workshops The first workshop was held from June 04 - 06 1994 while Lile second workshop was held during June 12 -14 1994 The third workshop was organized from June 15 - 17 1994 The three workshops were attend by 65 participants The workshop were organized with the objective of equipping tile District Education Officer and Sub-Division Education Officer with the basic features of buildiiig construction principles of inspection and considering for site selection and buildings takeover
Page No 10
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
1FINAL REPORT
The Government Middle School Shainsabad - Mastung was completed in 1993 4hile the remaiining two schools were at various stages of construction Dui ig the visit participants physically inspected the building anid gave their views on quality of const1tctLion and ways and means to be employed for further improving the quality of coiistruction The part icipauits iso gavw2 ihe~i views on the availability of constructtion material in the area and the piovince
The participants of seconid and third workshops visited the following school sitesshy
o Government Boys Middle School Machan - Pishin
o Government Buys Middle School Yaroo - Pishin
o Multigrade Girls Primary School Haideir Zai - Pishin
o Gove riment Girls Primary School Pod Gal i Chowk -Quetta
o Government Girls Primary School Saida Varez - Quetta
o Government Boys Primary School Sardar larez - Quetta
o Government Girls High School Irrigiicn Colony -
Quetta
The additional handouts given to the participants is presented in Volume-lI
33 Consumer Training Workshops PETROMAN as part of the assignment organized three consumer training workshops The first workshop was held from June 04 - 06 1994 while Lile second workshop was held during June 12 -14 1994 The third workshop was organized from June 15 - 17 1994 The three workshops were attend by 65 participants The workshop were organized with the objective of equipping tile District Education Officer and Sub-Division Education Officer with the basic features of buildiiig construction principles of inspection and considering for site selection and buildings takeover
Page No 10
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
FINAL REPORT
All the three consumer training workshop were conducted by Dr Nakhdumi Chief Counsellor (Technical) and Mr Sikandar Abul Khairi Counsellor The speakers after apprising the participants about the need and importance of the workshops gave a detail explanation of principles and stages of inspection as well responsibility of inspector at each stage of inspection A detail presentashytion oin the elements and types of buildingsstructures and materials used was also given The differences between architectural and st ructural elements of the buildings were also explained alongwith the importance ard features of building drawings includi ii subni-ioH wokiking and completionasbuilt drawings
A presentation on conisiderations and approach to be used in site selection and repairs iequired ill the buildinogs their structures and regular chocks requited for pitvenshyting major repairs was also given The participants were briefed about the major defects it construction of buildings and about the steps involved and checks to be pe1 forued in buildi ngs takenv r Tihe mtetlhodology to0 be adooted in estimating the qUantitiets ul civil works and buildings was also explained The participants were also briefed about the salient features of consumer field manual developed by PETROMAN as a part of the assignmerit The consumer field manual after discussing the rieed and principles of inspection and quality control and enforcement of specifications gave an exhaustive check list which could be used by the inspectors in various stages of inspection and quality control of building materials and construction work Various proformas which could help and act as a ready reference were also provided An explanation on the standards employed in building construction and conveision tables used was also given The consumer field manual is presented as Volume-II(e) amp 11(f) while handouts given to Ltle participants are presented as Volume-Ill
The participants showed keen interest -il topics covered in the workshop specially building takeover process and maintenance procedure The partici pants were of the opinion that their involvement in si t e selection and building const ruction activities should be enhanced
Page No 11
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
an FINAL REPORT
40 EFFECTIVENESS AND EVALUATION OF TilE TRAINING PROGRAM
The training program developed and organized by PETROMAN was
very effective and has met the objectives of the program
Tn all seven workshops were organized which were attended by
around 120 persons The participation ratio was around 90 The program has not only equipped the Divisional Engineers
Sub-Divisional Officers with techniques of project management
human relations construction management and field inspection but has also apprised the District Educatiou Officer about
the inspection and quality contol teclniiquvs repair and
maintenance of buildingstructures and check list of building takeover and site selection In all the workshops the
participants took active interest and appreciaied the
training progra-ws methodology and contents
In order to have the feedback about the participants satisfaction level PETROMAN got filled a program evaluation form (For specimen form see Appendix - II) Iii the form participants reaction on various aspects of the ptogram was obtained The results of the program evaluation have been tabulated and presented in Table-i The review of Table-I reveals that 75 to 90 of the participants of Project Management and Monitoring and Field Inspection Workshop were not satisfied with the duration of the workshops In case of consumer training workshop around 58 of the participants were not satisfied with the duration of workshops Major proportion of the participants rated thequality of handouts as good and excellent The participants were generally
satisfied with the knowledge and presentation of the speakers On Overall basis over 92 of the participants rated
the IIETROMANs coordination arrangement at the workshops as
excellentgcod
In case of project management and monitoring workshop over 80 of the participant rated the uverall standard as
excellent Around 49 of the participants of field inspection
workshops rated it as excellent while 46 rated it as good In case of consumer training workshop 86 of the
participants rated it as excellentgood
Page No 12
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
JFINAL REPORT
Majority of the participants were of the opinion that the
program should have been organized in another city eg
Murree (Punjab) or Karachi (Sirdh) This would have also
provided an opportunity to have exposure to practices being
followed by these provinces and interruptions due to
exigencies of the work would have been avoided
Page No 13
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
Table 1
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION
- COURSES SNo DESCRIPTION A B deg A l 1DI E8 I 23e G A
1 Wo P pari 141 1 101 _121 18 241 231
2 DURATION
No 1218571 9 9000 11 7333 91 75001 10 5556- 14 5833 1315652 Tcal 1 14 00000 10 M100001 15 M0000 12 110000 18 0oo0(0 24 00001 23 o0o
3 HANDOUTS Poor - - - - -
Fair - - - - -1- 1 833 1 55 3 1250 3 1304
Averege Good
Excelent Tota
2 1429 4 2857 8 5714
14 10000
- -3 3000 7 7000
1010000
1 667 10 6667 4 2667
15 10000
2 7 2
12
16670 5833 166710ooj
1 558 8 4444 8 4 4 4 4
18 10000
1 417 14 6833 612500
24 0000
1 435 16 6957 3 1304
23 1OO00
4 COORDINATION Poor Fair
--
--
-- -
-- -
1
556
-311250 - -
Awrege Good
1 3
714 2143
-2
-2000
1 1
667 2000
11 833 41 3333 1
- _
8 4444 1
12 417
500(0 1
19 435
8261 Exeent 10 7143 8 8000 11 7333 7 5833 915000 8 3333 3 1304
ToWa 14 10000 10 1000Pk 1510000 12 t0000 18I0000 24 10000 23 10000 5 RATING OF SPEAKER I
- KNOWLE-DGE_____ __________________ _____
Poor I
Fair - I
11714 -
-~
-I
-
I___ T - i -
_
1 I 11
-558I
-- I - 1
_i1435
Averege] Good
- I -
3 2143 -
3 -
3000 ---
4 2
33330 1667
11 5561-512778]
- -11 4583
I -71 3043
- PRESE_NTAION
E)0en~t Total
__
10 7143 1410000
____
7 7000 10 10000
__
15 I0000 15 000(
_______
6 5000 12 10000
__
11] 6111l 181 000 I
____
135417 PA000
____
15 6522 2310000
____
Poor - -- - i - - - -
Fair 1 714 - - - - - - 1 55m Averege - 2 4 3333 1 55 1
Good Exceon
3 10
2143 7143
1 9
100c 9000
3 12
2000 8000
2 6
16675000
511
27786111
1014 41675833 1112 47835217
Total i4 10000 1010000 1500000 12 10000 18 I0000 24 0000 23 0000 - OVERALL
Poor
Fair Averege
Good -
1
3
714 -
2143
-
2
2000
2
1333
4 2
3333 1667o
1 1 5
556 5561
2778
--
9
--
3750
--
11
--
4783 E-oeleM 10 7143 8 8000 13 8667 6 5000 11 6111 15 6250 12 5217
Total 14 10000 10 10000 15 10000 12 10000 18 10000 24 10000 23 10000
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
RESULTS OF PROGRAM EVALUATION o
S
6
DESCRIPTION A AgT B C Age D gX E AFgeA
IN
Poor Fair
Aver Good
Exce et
I
-i -
7-5
-24
11 7857
14 0090
- -
-
9 9000
10000005
-
-
-
-1 14
15
-
--1 63889
0000i
- -
-1
514167
12 0000
-
_
9
1J
-
6--shy5_W16_
5000_ 00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- OVERAL
Aver Good
ToaJ
2 11 4AN
-
1429-W44o 78576
- -
110 00
j67 66
1387
43333 320
47
16
44
- -
7
-- Ton- 14 00 0 00
Fai 1 1 22 Excleit 117878 00
ToI 1 00 1 00
OVERALL STANDARD OF PROGRM14PDOA10mo800 Poor - -F-L N Fair 1 714I F IN ET1
AvDr - -Good 3 2143 1 1000
Exceent 10 7143 9 9000 LTotal 14 00004 10 0000
5 00 14 766
3 67
1 00 WRH -
1 667FL 10 6667 4 2667
150 0n R
2 00
3 5 5 4167
12 000083 -
6 5000 5 4167
12 000
8 00
1 7i61
4444 iW4444
16000000shy-
2 1 1 3889A V1
8 4444-o 1 00
14 - -
-shy
1 417 311250115833I
61250-7o 2400
- -
21 87 141 6087m 304 300
Course TITLE
B EWNSETINI WORKSHOP - I I I -B FEW IDNSPECTIO WORKS3HOP - II
E CO SUM R T Ii N WO KSIr F CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP - II G CONSUMER TRAINING WORKSHOP- III
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
FINAL REPORT
50 C(ONCLUISION amp RECOMMENDATION
The overall output of the Training Workshops have been satisfactory and has in-culcated deep interest in the participants about importance of quality control and quality assurance in the construction work Participation of Divisional amp Sub-Divisional Education officer iii the supervision of construction work was very interesting and gueerated lot of quarries about the extent of their responsibility in the completion of a school building
[etroman feels that by pioviding the participants in general and Directorate of Primary Education in particular Field Mnutuals a pioneer work has been carried out for inspection of coiistruction work The manuals will be helpful in a long way for improving quality of construction
It is suggested thai more workshops of similar natuie should be held keeping the size of the group to a minimum of 10 to 12 so that active participation by each individual can be achieved To get the objective it is proposed that workshops for persons involved in areas located in extreme cold climate may be run during this period when the schools are closed Similarly in hot weather the training may be carried out during summer when the schools are closed
To get the best output of good quality construction the contractors may also be required to get training for quality control in construction There are two aspects of quality one is quality control and the other is quality assurance The formar being the responsibility of contractor while the later of consultants and inspectors Since the contractors of the remote areas are not familiar with the methods of quality conltrol training is desired for them
The training program organized and conducted by Petroman for Project Management and Monitoring Workshop has been very uffecLive and achieved its objective of equipping the Divisional EngineersSub-Divisional Officers wi h1 basic skills of Project Management human relations computer aided pioj ct planning and monitoring team work amp motivation
Page No 16
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
FINAL REPORT
For Field Engineers supervisors of all the activities ofconstruction work have been explained in detail includingquality control field testing with visual observation stating the required specification and InterniationalStandards of ASTM (American Society of Testiiig Mateiials) arid BS (British Standards)
A lot of stress was made on job commitment as it was realisedthat it i their prime responsibility to get the best construction work By stating the every body feels GREAT PRIDE IN good quality construction work
The Field Engineers witre explained method of taking outquantities of various items of work 1nic luding their measurement at site and approval and rejection of work cartied out
Site visits for Field Engineers were very useful and induced lot of interest The DEOSSDEOS desired that ii theirtraining program a day may have beeni reserved for site visits
Detail Job Description of Divisional EngineeisSub-DivisionalEngineersSub-Engineer was developed by Petroman as desiredthrough interviews conducted at Qiiet ta with concerned personnel and high government officials The job description was developed technically considering theall aspectsrequired to complete the job and taking into account the jobdescription of similar personnel in other Government SemiGovernment Department and autonomous organization
It is expected that the participants will now be in a better pos]Iion to supervise monitor the construction work and maintrain the school buildings
Page No 17
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
4APPENDIX-I
QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW FORM
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
__
__
I I ~ NOF B L M( 7 1SAl[1 lJIiA IDP E I( O V J shya
LVARILLCPART-AQKJ IE
_ tn NAHI- ~ampr( _DES- IGNAT [ON DI-V q ---QIyhIAJ1
I)EPARHTHEMGTJf LOCATION 4
JNS11TIITONNCItv4L)L1 FIELD OF SPECIALIZAT1ION
SIJHHARY OF P~RE~SENT JOBASSIGNKEHTS D)ESCRIIPTION
EXPERIENCE t1 C~IW~~
TRAINING RECEIVED9 vvt-__ 4 l~
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
I[USAuIT liDPEDGOVTl OF BAWLOI I1iAN
[AHr1CLVANTPRO EJLL
NAME ornfz -
D)EPARTMENT bbI)EAIIHEN Go To
QtALIX1GATIO DEG(EEDIPLOHA
INSIITUTION 77 RASVL
TRAINING RECEIVED
DESIGNATION
2)1 x 2LOCATION -_TIL7
FROM bA6 CIVIL
FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION
SUMHARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION _j
_16S ) _____ _ __
EXPERIENCE _ IV t__________ ____
doo CYEi
4CLo 24L9[
79-0))YEAR_-
_ q 9
shy
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
an [ iUSAI)PEDow 0VF AIA)CII TAN
PAIITIC lPAtTA-PJIQ ILE tA ULLC O F PAtL EL
NAMIE__ HAMUOLLA LJ 1ANL_______ DESIGNAIION P_TcT_AZCIE(
DEPARTMENT __QCA7CII LOCATION 5 -C kAILJAYr Hamp-
QUAIECAI1_ORt DEGREEDI-POHA FROM 6z1 4-f14 KYEAR ()p-_a
INSTITUTION H C A 4 _Il FIELD OF SPECIALIZATION A__j4(r
A- 0 w)j-L 6pE Q ~- C6C-NS rAMampf-D r-A SUMMARY OF PRESENT JOBASSIGNMENTS DESCRIPTION
h~ LL~Z ~ PDYgJ cjS le- F-rCECT
ft~L~g IM
T-_vf__amphL__J
-- LpTy AAwD --- ~ amp p i~~4
-- _i L)-CI~ L 1L C AAE-c Y-
EXPERIENCE E A P1 C N c- E Ui(U__-A
AST 4APIC44-1
0--14Lrat _qQLSOc 04- p r) (r V
-- c v- 4 T ttP p VV CloK)5 - -LC A t -it O13 Pfc S kio -l CC k-- ST
TRAINING RECEIVED __ 1
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
--
-- ---
P1 A iof A~qco 3Fi 1)V Slnlo Polrolom RolinInq amp bull Peltochomlcal Corporation (PvI) Lid MINlItry of Indigiwesl A rcnlti+n onngo rasliIan
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Execulive uhould complela Ihlo Iolln Ior himself bull
23 The Senior Ollicer hould coiiplete Italso In respect of his oubordlnntColumn A ran the job agnilot each compelency listed Une a ocale ol 5 for I igh and 0 for Low 4 Column f3 rale indivIdunl performance against each compelency5 rl oxocutivo and hlI nonlor ohould then cornpare their views and nond them oil no Indlcnnld hlowv 0
A gap belween coluinnu A amp B may indicate a training needT1ItS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET TIE iRAINING THEY NE-EIITI IAS NO CONNEC lION WITH TI IEACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH TIHE SENIOR AND II IEEXECUTIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS7 RE TU RN 10 BY S N C()MIIH ( COLUMN A 11 -OIAIMN
-- shy 11 PJro~ l pounddc gcit I p
I-L
VANCIH TO CURRIJINI JOB PI LSOHAL M l _ A II - - -shy K11- -Jwh w 1t-I --iT ht I iicnliu I r~Il j-)vr
if in3 nowlIr Piovi Imuk lingircinnierWl itLlI+ (l) I lpll OiUrnh 2_
4 AnI n dir I i l S vin8 - rc i iion nkinit - c - -- eni- i -- - - - -
In- ncin Sills-- 7 i IIIp - _______--_
- - iiiiiic -2- 3 -
----- _
i-0 L si ivi3 q
~iIOIllin u i~y2 ---___________________--_3 In imil liii 1i for-eJio SI
14 A bili yk baI l - Slaff 3 - - ----- 15 In[iq -()i npVkp -- -___+1 __ i 17 I Mi i i Iu d ___-____i_-16 Ofle I iien11(ont Se Iills _I_____
18ilkil1e uno ruuto
I ~i i - - - - shy
a1 W oking L -SI I k i I
20To ni n ln
24 Trlaj l v ) p umo Sbod I 3 ________ L I 1- i~i + I o I
-I-+ i o _ ii i~b hii - 9 - 3
----1 A=38-IL25 II( I 1p I
bull 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A - 8 2-)
lheonso tick lise box nrinln yutumr Nnne
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
______________
P A lsIn of Stnto Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd tllnhttiy of Induslitr a rindtirtlon onvi of reklmn
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executlivo should complete this fori for hilmoelf
23 The Smnlor Ollier ohould complete Italso In reopecl of his subordinaleColumn A rain Ihe Job agalnst each competency listed Use a scale of 5 for I Iuqh and 0 for Low 4 Columnr 1 rnoe IndIviduni performance againot each competency5 The oxoculivo ond his henlor should Ihon compare their vlows and send them ofl na Indlcn6ed belowA gp belweer columns A amp B may Indicate a training need6 THIS 1-01M ISDESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE T1 IAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING 1HFEY NEEI)IrIIAS NO CONNECTION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTH ltiE SENIOR AND TI IEEXECU FIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI HEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 REII tlN 10 -1 i (Ol III P4Cl_- -1 COLUMNA -1 ()Itlh 1W
RIIVANCI TO CURRBIi ilo [IISONAI A5sISSIMlm r
2 tKn wt-rdp I11th ( F(hi l ion I)eclit[l O )jri vrn - _ 3 tI tc v l I ovitini k I jicvcinn l n in
_
ClE41aliol - pli llc nlm____ it t bull- _____ - _ Ifluelmiq Sjldllj~ t Dci~ioN 4 A -
9-- n IIO iriqSbuslil pl( ___________n_____ ___ ____________ _____
- - - - --1f6 Nepteoli -- - - - 3 -
- _shy
1 ltehiihii --h Ilboil rrejunior Sin[(
11__ Ability to ili vnlicle nnd IraItJinior Sianf Al A5 1 IInjhI vo i iI
--17 Nnuamniflhor~miltiii lb linit in n i+ shy 6 Y - -] ____________-______________-__18 IctnioiiM mitrn- I- X -- - - 4 ~ -~
loamn Working]iicSkllh________19 Sitpeiv otrolRhjaintnjnin Diili a __________-_________ -
20 To lead a lenm23II cti ii In ll 11I ik iii aleacin Q T__________- 2 ktimiit 24 12 i tit evelopm enIofSiiba 9el i -S 25 i it
NA 0 IAL--Aiiibii- 11K11IOC( S - - I
0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A t3 ~pound Il lickojtle box anSinm y ir an - -N
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
_____________
- -
Sinln Preholoum Rnflnlrg amp Pelroclmlcal Corporation (Pvt) Ltd N 1tflilhl of Indtuiotles A rioslluction Govt o rislaln
CIliii - AmIIIiI IAI ( I 1I1i I AN (1 11II I A
ANALYSIS OF TnAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ghould complete this Ioin for hiimslf2 The Senilr Officer ohould complete I also In respect ofA 3 Column A role tli Jot ls libordlnaleagnglt ench compelency I led Use a ocoln of 5 for I ligh ani 0 for Low4 Colunln B role IndivIdunl pelormanco aginsl onch competency5 The oxocullvo and hli senlor ahould Ilan compare their vlew nand cond them off n Indiclnol bolowA gnp brilweon columnsT6 A amp B rrty Indicate n tralnIlng needTI IIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE THAT EXECUTIVES GET THE iRAINING II IEY NEFI)Ir I lAS NO CONNECTION WITH TI IE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTI IIlI F SENIOR ANI 11 IFEXECUIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT TI IEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS 7 RE rURN to BY
chc I(Jlii _ ~I1___ cIIf)j i _i( lfiellof i oIi imik i enmini- t shy 4 Ali )i ctltl h lSliivo NJ
___ __ A Ifluoncing S ills
-10 - poi i 0 - ep itl~eCWi~i~
Inim A- 13 HeI t iiinwith___
r to( li l _ __
WI lill i 1li l iIl c Io 1joriS nli i 2i6 GVmlliilVtEin~bIolive I ro1-njnj41iClIl--- - -
Inials amp~0C 1mesnj WVujk Ii finodW roirccn -- ~~~ - - _~ [ _- _ --
2( o ni n Irm
-- - - _llill i iin of
_ Sell lls c4 IA i I vn 3 _ 25 22 ~~~~ -1 n1 I IWTirliillwie rxz = 3 SK5I~r iit l |Slllln
____ Irocvdurin Q mnlyAiA j_I I iA)I VI -(B OCK CA ITAIS) f -i HAW 01 S1 (11-01 CAII Il i)
- - J 0 1 2 3 4 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUMA-b IIi On rlick fle b ot liiioll yosirr 2
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
i AI)IIilon of )I(Ae~kL tkct1L SlInt0 Palroleiun Refining amp kWL rtN(-Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd _1 MInItr of Indivatilca A FfIndIclon of railgitnnduvi
Clieng - g NAJ)~II 1AI J(llI T bullOQI pITA
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive should complete Ihiform for himnelf 2 The Senior Officer ahould cornplele IInao Inreopec A his oubordirmlte3 Column A rale the job ngalnot ech competency Ililad We a ocale of 5 for Higlh nd 0 for Low4 Column i rtoleinlivkitmnl performance againsi ench competency5 1he XocullivO nnd lila nonlor ohould Ihon compote their viewo and ocnd Ihem ofl nn Indilcai d below
0 A gop belween columna A amp B may Indicote a training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI IAT EXECUFIVES GET TI IF TRAINING 11 IFY NEEIIT HAS NO CONNECTION WIllI T1iE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM 1oTI I I IitSENIOR nAND I IfEXECUIlVE SHOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
7 RE JUR N 10 Y 3 N11h011 t C 1113 It CCIJUNvN A shy (()i+IN I I
ionn ii e oRULB VANCIITOCURIUl Jm) llUI1ONAI AS IfII i1i l(nowVhdt(t-t dtmilcion L pll Ot4biir
iKnm vlil st ii k n iii-in mi ____irnn
A-n-nXi-+rdSH116-- ibipm solving i - _ bull
- p-+Mki--
Shllu hil
-- 0
111 Ii(C1 T6o Wrir ( in Commi+ pi LWIiiamp S_ - I e pii --- a-if)
-
-__ lg~ f3- i iii t Inloisr forc-lnior Stn 3 14 Ability IoIIIqL nlC n11 IcoitJln ior S~fIf
- _----- I-~ (-=-ai-=+ ---- - ---- -- - -
- lhde- 1 CrllIioll1 o t I -if------ -- ~Dlii+rg_c n ai __7_iL7M ni i i - - - l + r ource -p-lt io nii S-
- -I-A+r Co trcVM ai +oWok irig) iii--- -nni-_ __- --- 3 J sect I 6 ~-iL-
---- -1
I- _ Irnikiii ni - 2 _ _ e ccia shy
I I Pj1C
25 innncjiitlfl fi l l l
N W OFEXELIVI V NA _I__711NIt)II(IIOCK CA1-11 A1S)i I
bull0 1 2 43 5 MINIMUM MAXIMUM A j3
PIcRno lick the box nRntinI your Nnnie
tI
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A I ionof flLLLJSolno Petroleum Refining amp Petrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MihIly or Indusilet A Prodicllon (C wl of telthlan
Clienl - ALrlIVIA)lIX I1 rAN 001I1A
ANALYSIS OF TRFAINING NEEDS
1 Each Executive ohould complete thiB forn for himsell 23 The Sonior Officer should complete IIalso In respect of his oubordinaleColumn A ite the job agalnst each competency lIsted Use a scale of 5 for 11l911 and 0 for Low 4 Column B rte IndivIdurtl performance agningt each competency5 Thd execuive and hi senlor should Ihen compare their views and send them oil nn Indlcnld hIow
A gap between columns A amp B may Indlcate a trainlng need6 THIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET TIlE iRAINING 111EYNEEDITHAS NO CONNECIION WITH THE ACR DO NOT SIGN THIS FORM BOTHl THE SENiol AND THE
EXECU IIVE SIiOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLO)CK CAPITALS 7 R E TURN TO BY P I I COL I - I-t
- To cunRUIIJO 11HSONA^tSMIr__o___inn___ _mhd e____ ___
hiclc-ic ivra- 3 Kj wlc Ic s icinI ccrkmi rEnvironmenl in
K2o_dpp (I ierpi Objc --
Edicnliou I)e111 Oplcrnc- j1icnl- ll -A_-_ S P-b_i iit DP iFicfin -0Y -
_- I_________________________
W1i i1Iv -li n __lu3 t it lc li nlt pLt
-
clci Slnfluon I nbou fo--Jino Sin((-T-
-1__ cblilcn( llcuuccsnlIiiJno IMzii(~ _______ C9-i CIII-ciliu cr~ op ___________ -- lii cl icc --- +--- -- -
] C4 nl lli -shy[--- c c( S _______--- 1omWod nl]Skills0 __- ___15 1 (iviiiiccf li c ieving
clc_i _ ___-_____18 I tic F_o_o s __7_ __ 13-2sect-l -o ---oI j i it-Ii i hurof S19 SccnncinncwaOreemifhcljAijjneshy26 l oen or n hlii - shy - - - - - shy
_IM + XIECIIV CALPITALOF O(( NAM[| 011 H01 t( I((ICAIT L-5)
i i )1 I - I
20 1 2 c3c33 4 5cc
MINIMUM degMAXIMUM A- 8 - 3 Pleneci lick Ilsebox npninl your Nasme
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
gan
A )hhlon ofState Peirolaulm Refining ampPetrochemical Corporation (Pvt) Ltd MInlirj of ndiniIrg A raidurtlon Gnvj of ralIaimn
-
-
Si)A(l~llA)II1I11IIA
I M ceLLt
I d IIIISTIAN 011 II
ANALYSIS OF TRAINING NEEDS 1 Each Executive ohould complete tIhi2 form for himsell
3 The Senior Olficer ohould complele Italoo In reospect of 1is oubordlinaleColumn A rate Ihe Job ngalnot each competency listed Use a ocale of 5 for I lIIjlh and 0 for4 owColumn B rtle Individual performance agalnt each compelency5 The oxocutlvo and hln onlor olhould fhan compare their views and olid them ofl nn hlcllcntnd blowA gap between coluUrnIro A amp B may Indicate a6 training needTHIS FORM IS DESIGNED SOLELY TO ENSURE TI tAT EXECUTIVES GET THE TRAINING IHEY NEEDIT IAS NO CONNECTION WITH Tt IEACR DO NOT SIGN TI 11S FORM BOTHEXECUIIVE SI IOULD SIMPLY INSERT THEIR NAMES IN BLOCK CAPITALS
IHE SENIOR AND TI IE 7 RETU RN N I--( gtii hr~icin - BYs CEIUD ________o___ jCO MIOIi tMJ nWANC R TO CU lRUNTrJO BP lgeofeI~m~iicsine iInloet~rlllo it eciv e InullOIirvir _P cL RS H I IS hI
Ilnfvl hlov- - --p lnini ik Ivirnninen 2 Innlenc tdicng V IJjokill Ol~~cj4 Ail~ligni SHIl hRII(Ile Sovige - ui~o Nnkina-
II I shy -L
10 Nef
2 )
deg 5--I -b~ii I iPlI I - ~ 1cI3li mi I n nbnI Irh
17 J l i1n g6 i on0 H c-cni i d Io or
IM114IR (h rnihp -
OI2t bi~~ DIc ------ - --- 20- i t- ii i2 a fll)C -i
I
--
11-- j
23 wi hiS rii shy
26 _ 24 (Im(11Provenrit~iQfljilAwnsgness cii111S ii O(AlrjrII I 1jArOF PU 3___________IxLH jKCAIITAUS) NAM I1 I9ci I AIS)
I0 2 3 54 A 4MINIMUM J MAXIMUMIloAs tirkI libox npn nml your Nnn it - A 13
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
U~ N F ~~ ~fl DE NT ic IJUf3U46nr3 IAC 0AA rL-fvA(t
~dLI~ILI
VUI lES I-FIFUHMIED L
AADMINSIAlYE DUTESENERALAFFAIRS
~ltL ~J )u~j 4~U+t A(AkV
_ _ L
ty -D _7IZ~
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
NONILL--A-(-(-JL-JN1-5 DUI
CQNGffj Ajl L -IES
-nfMLI jEMENT DUT
-P-LAT-shy
t
I j shyql I
Ir
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
Pe
I) CONTRACT MANAGEMENT DUTIES
I - 4--
E FIELDOUT DOOR DUTIES 9- 1 C1Yjdr
~ (A)
-- lt
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
-------------
Iian
F SUPERVISOJRANtANEMENT DUrJEa
(3MISCELLENUUSANY DIUTIES
_4)
Jsect Tr
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
CIVIL ri 1)7-clo1liTE Jlf- __ FI AT CI
JI iWffN ICATlION
SUPERVISORY CHARGE OF ALL OFFICE AND jIL
DUI~ IE-EFUMED A 0IDMINISIRAJIVE DUTIESGENERALAFFAIRs
A_) ADMINISTRAPlVE CONTROLOVBR ALLWO)RlK INHAND AND MAINTINANCEDISCIPrINE IN OFFICE
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
andD
6) -Making AcontLaja-e To-4shy
1CUNR3)IjcIUN MNGENT UTIES
TO CONTROL~ THlE QUALITY OF W4ORKS IN HIAND
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
I)INIRACTIANAGEMENT DUTIES
R__SPONSIBIE FORI-TEATTr[p POPT NTE LR_ FR WIDE PUBLICITY IN REPUTED MEANS PAPERS IN ORDER
TO ACHIVE COMPITITIVE RATES
E FIELD0UT DOORDUTIES
SUPERVISION OVER CONSTRUCTION WORKS AND CONTROL OV QUALITYOFWORK
ty
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
U (IfERVISoRYIMlAN-MANGEMENr DUTIES
TO MAINTAIN OFFICE DISPLINE
- - -
0ER - L -OI R [ -O -q 9 [e
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
4 a APPENDIX-II
PROGRAM EVELUATION FORM
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
PROJECT MANAGEMENT amp MONITORING WORKSHOP (MAY 09 - 12 1994)
PROGAM VALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days LI5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
Quality of Handouts POOR 1 2
FAIR 3 4
AVERAGE 5 6
GOOD 7 8
EXCELLENT 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
-i- 2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT
MR MOHAMMAD N HUSSAIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR UBAID HASAN AKHTAR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR GOODAVERAGE EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes L No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or byother training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others 4
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name (S_
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP-I (MAY 14 - 16 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks ~ Others LI
2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10 Coordination
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
2
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENTOverall Standard
of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No D
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Sirilar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LID
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP - II
(MAY 28 - 30 1994)
PIRO(IAN LVALUATION FORM
INSRIIUCTIiNS Please place a Cross (x) inl life approp iae box utiless
stated otherwise
I (a) Was the durat ion of the pr-ogram adequa e
Yes 7 NoL i) (b) If not what should be the duraLiou
4 D~ays 5 Dayes
2 Week~s jOthers
Q2 Plasi suggest topic(s) nuLt proseiLly inc 1 ided which you would like lu have included in a program such as this
Q 3 Pl eae take each aspect iiIdependenLtly and indicate your eitry iinthu kaiing column by placing a circle around the uumber hIt mihostnearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AV[F1[AGI- GOOD EXCIiJIENTQuality of Hlandout s I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETRONAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
I
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELIENT
DR SM MAIKIIDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Overal 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1O
Mr SIIANDER ABUL KIAIR Knowledge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0PrtsIt atioil I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1OOveurall I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCFLLENT Over-al I Standard of h Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Qg Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If lt how (to you rate the overall standarud of LiUs i logil n iii compaii) ison to programssimilar offered by tlhe justitutt III byothel training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worst than others
q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to imptoe our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROIIEMI CAI CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASS INGEMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIELD INSPECTION WORKSHOP -III
(MAY 31 - JUNE 02 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM (I~~~ IIl
INSTIUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate buX 1ziluss stated otherwise
qI (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No 7 (b) If not whaL shutld be the durat ioll
4 D)ays 5 Days
2 Weeks OthlerS
S2 Pleaits SUggeSt top ic(s) not preseltly imluded which you wollidlike It) have includted in a program such as this
Q 3 Pleas Lake each aspect independently and indicate yoti enirythe ial ig column by placing a circle around the ill
nuniber Ihat reoestneirly matches your reacLlo
POOlR FAIRQuality of llandouls i 2 3 AVERAGE GOII) EXtCIIIIENT5 6 78 9 O
PETIIMIAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I0 o rd i lat i ol
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXEILENT
DR SM MAMIIDUIIN Knowledge 1 2 3 4 65 7 8 9 I0Presetiation I 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 IOvera I1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 I)
Mr SIlANI)ER ABUL IIIAIR KnowIedge I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Presgit dijon I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1()OverlI1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 i
POOR FA AVERA(I GOOD XiINOVLI Il Standard of tim Progiam 1 2 3 54 6 7 8 9 10
Qit Are you participating first Lime in this type of plrogijim
Yes )j No
If iot how do you rate the overall sLandard of Lhis pi il itcopi ison to similar prog ramms offered by ite iili ut us oi byotliel Lrairiig organizatioils
Bet I i L hai others
Simli I1 to others
Woi cSIhan oLhers
Q Please list additional Coimmiients that could be coistiti ive to imp iuvi our P)rog rains iii Iore
Sigiiat iure
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT
FOR PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA
ON FIRST WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING
(JUNE 04 - 06 1994)
SPROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No LI
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
-2 -
RATING OF SPEAKERS
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge Presentation Overall
MR SIKANDER ABUL KHAIR Knowledge Presentation Overall
Overall Standard of the Program
POOR
1 2 1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2 1 2
POOR
1 2
FAIR
3 4 3 4 3 4
3 4 3 4 3 4
FAIR
3 4
AVERAGE
5 6 5 6 5 6
5 6 5 6 5 6
AVERAGE
5 6
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
7 7 7
8 8 8
9 9 9
10 10 10
GOOD EXCELLENT
7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes E No 7
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
SECOND WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 12 - 14 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATION FORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x)in the appropriate box unless stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration I
4 Days 5 Days L 2 Weeks Others I
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate -Nur entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
lt1
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Woyse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
A Division of
STATE PETROLEUM REFINING amp PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION (PVT) LTD
CONSULTANCY ASSIGNMENT FOR
PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT QUETTA ON
THIRD WORKSHOP FOR CONSUMERS TRAINING (JUNE 15 - 17 1994)
PROGRAM EVALUATIONFORM
INSTRUCTIONS Please place a Cross (x) in the appropriate box unless
stated otherwise
Q1 (a) Was the duration of the program adequate
Yes No
(b) If not what should be the duration
4 Days 5 Days Z 2 Weeks Others
Q2 Please suggest topic(s) not presently included which you would like to have included in a program such as this
Q3 Please take each aspect independently and indicate your entry in the rating column by placing a circle around the number that most nearly matches your reaction
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Quality of Handouts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
PETROMAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Coordination
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
-2-
RATING OF SPEAKERS POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT
DR S M MAKHDUMI Knowledge 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Presentation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Overall 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 96 10
POOR FAIR AVERAGE GOOD EXCELLENT Overall Standard of the Program 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Q4 Are you participating first time in this type of program
Yes No l --
If not how do you rate the overall standard of this program in comparison to similar programs offered by the institutes or by other training organizations
Better than others
Similar to others
Worse than others
Q5 Please list additional comments that could be constructive to improve our Programs in future
Signature
Name
