President Obama High Profiles Article 7, Offers Yet Another Full Mea

Culpa, Experiences Jimmy Fallon’s MK-Ultra Gate Hot Seat and is Inexplicably Still Selling the Benefits of Congress’ Allocation

Right after the epiphany delivered that which led to what is now almost fifteen months of condemnation and pressure the U.S. leader

didn’t deny the allegations; instead he chose to say he’d take “concrete steps” - his first mea culpa. That implicit admission persisted throughout 2011 and until March 16, ‘12 when he offered his second mea culpa. His third was delivered on April 23rd - the Canadian lawyer’s birthday - during an event that sought to underscore what his Article 7 Institute was at its genesis then after the February ‘11 discovery – accountability for MK-Ultra R&D, deployment

and global proliferation and then coalition public sector unlawfulness and impropriety.

When the Article 7 Accountability Institute was launched in January 2011 its

first target audience was every Jewish organization, association, group and

news agency in the United States. As is stated in e-mail intros:

What has remained out of the public domain to date is their multi-decade militarized violation of Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights; the successor to the Nuremberg Code and

its prohibition on governments conducting experiments on citizens without consent. Given what the Nazis did in the concentration camps in this regard there is no other group in the world that has a greater entitlement to be in the forefront of condemnation than the Jewish people. […]

In January 2011 all major organizations and news agencies in the U.S. and some in Israel were contacted and invited help trigger the international incident. […]

You will observe in the diplomacy archive many high profile American and international public and private sector leaders and individuals have contributed, some repeatedly. (The gateway to the archive is in the “History” section.) In the “New Submissions” section there’s a compilation of prominent Jewish-Americans who assisted in the back-channel effort over the years. Former Israeli Prime Minister Olmert and his government joined the coalition in June 2007; and Prime Minister Netanyahu’s first of several contributions was in May 2009.

http://mkultragate.weebly.com/uploads/1/4/6/2/14622630/mkultra2.pdfhttp://mkultragate.weebly.com/uploads/1/4/6/2/14622630/mkultra139.pdf

Two of the plethora of direct contacts made were The Elie Wiesel Foundation

for Humanity and the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. It was

more than surprising when not one of these many organizations was

interested in what was presented. Sixteen months later the founder of the

former is face-to-face with President Obama and during his speech geo-

politicizes it; and, most encouragingly, there’s intended-to-be observable

collaboration between the White House and his audience to deliver the

message how tenaciously resolved the people with a front-row entitlement

to be outraged and involved is now working to achieve stated goals.

The day chosen for this remarkable event was April 23rd; the Canadian

lawyer’s 54th birthday. Being one of the dates on the coalition calendar

partners acknowledge as significant, the President arranged his speaking

schedule for that day to involve the high profiling of in what the Article 7

Institute finds its conceptualization. In the same category of initiative as

what’s documented in President Obama Schedules First Visit to Canada to

Help Coalition Partners Celebrate the Canadian Lawyer’s Fifth Anniversary of

Seeking Political Asylum, the U.S. leader spoke at New York’s Holocaust

Museum as the guest of Elie Wiesel. Doing so drew geo-attention to Article

1 and 4 of the Nuremberg Code, and thus their successor: Article 7 of the

U.N.’s International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights.

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary

physical and mental suffering and injury: Nuremberg Code, Articles 1 and 4. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 7.

His first communiqué is to put on the record the fact that Jewish

organizations are now involved in pursuing coalition interests and objectives.

We're joined today by communities who've made it [19:46: O-S M.] your mission to prevent mass atrocities in our time.

Next he looks like he’s amplifying the approach of the Canadian Citizens

Party; seeking to build a grassroots enthusiasm for its primary reform of

government.

He immediately goes on to say he talked with Mr. Wiesel about his and his

predecessor’s unlawfulness and offers another mea culpa.

[20:28: O-S M.] It's an achievable goal. But [O-S M.] is one that does not start from the top. It starts from the bottom up. It's remarkable as we walked through this [20:35: Obama M.] exhibit, Elie and I were talking as we looked at the unhappy record of the State Department

and so many officials here in the United States during those years; and he asked “what would you do?”.

Him saying...

We're joined today by communities who've made it [19:46: O-S M.] your mission to prevent mass atrocities in our time.

... is demonstrated shortly thereafter to be true when the camera cuts to a

member of the audience who’s cued to employ the lexicon that confirms this

commitment:

[25:53: attendee: Colbert M.] The world sent a message to war criminals everywhere we will not relent in bringing you to justice. Be on notice.

What will prove the following communiqué to be an accurate representation

of the U.S. leader’s loyalty to coalition aspirations is when the Canadian

lawyer takes possession of what Congress’ allocated:

... to bring together senior officials from across our government [26:39: O-S M.] to focus on this critical mission. This is not an afterthought.

View video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrN9nVZEm0c&feature=relmfu

But until then it’s to be presumptively categorized as yet another instance of

chronic dysfunctionality, revelatory of a systemic abdication of U.S. and

coalition national security interests that emboldened the malfeasant and if

there’s no swift action a circumstance that should be publicized.

It’s to be noted the foregoing came only hours after the following was

argued:

Delay is not tolerable. Why was there after the construction of a transference mechanism from Washington to Vancouver? Why the delay between February 17th and April 10th? For that matter, why the delay from February 28, 2011 when the President said he’d take “concrete steps” until being condemned by a wide variety of world leaders and the high profile up to and including while in Europe in late May? Why also the delay when it appeared an agreement had been reached in late July, early August over quantum by House and Senate

leaders and the President? And what about the delay after the October 26th statement he’d take those steps and the day after’s militarized deployment of MK-Ultra? And then one must point out the delay after the late November ultimatum that led to his Canadian counterpart being summoned to the White House for a December 7th meeting, and the time that transpired from the battering he took throughout that month and all of January until the State of the Union

Address. That’s a whole lot of inexplicable and inexcusable delay. A possibility, or perhaps even a high likelihood given circumstances involving undetected egregious conduct over seven years, has to do with just how much MK-Ultra is the Holy Grail for military and intelligence leaders and law enforcement. Could it be that even after being caught engaging in these abuses of power and threatened with all sorts of

consequences that would dwarf Watergate Obama et al. stalled for even more time to give the R&D program an opportunity to deliver more advances? It’s a discussion and debate worth having within coalition circles.

On April 24th he delivered a speech at the University of North Carolina. At

11:16 he executes a Brooke M. timed to and O-S M. immediately following

the word “borrow”, which refers to what the allocation represents.

http://mkultragate.weebly.com/uploads/1/4/6/2/14622630/appendix_ch_20_17.pdfhttp://mkultragate.weebly.com/uploads/1/4/6/2/14622630/appendix_ch_20_17.pdf

At 13:35 another O-S M. “we’ve been in your shoes; we didn’t come from a

wealthy family”.

And another O-S M. [@ 16:15] timed to “One of the best investments

America can make in our future; this is important to all of us”.

The next use of that geo-gesture is timed [@ 16:40] to “We can't make

higher education a luxury; it's an economic imperative”.

Another O-S M. timed [@21:34] to “by making higher education a higher

priority in their budgets”.

At 33:49 his O-S M. to “don’t double my rate” referred to the increase from

$5 to $10 billion. And then grimaces.

View video

He indicates during this appearance he’d taped a show with late night host

Jimmy Fallon in the city. The broadcast, of course, was recorded expecting

http://www.c-span.org/Events/Pres-Obama-Discusses-Student-Loan-Interest-Rates/10737430099/

the comedienne to continue helping advance partners’ collective goals and

do to the President what the likes of David Letterman, Jay Leno and Jon

Stewart did in turning up the heat over the MK-Ultra Gate scandal.

Jimmy’s contributed to coalition interests and objectives related to the

scandal as documented:

October 5th ended with Jimmy Fallon, whose comedic monologue has often included MK-Ultra Gate relevant jokes. He began the show with one that had President Obama in the MK-Ultra Gate condemnation crosshairs unabashedly describing him as a mutation.

Welcome to Late Night with Jimmy Fallon everybody. Thank-you for being here. Hey, ah, did you guys read about this: a new study found that being publicly embarrassed can make people like you more; which explains Obama’s new campaign slogan “Barack Obama - I have a third nipple”. [audience laughter]

On November 21st Jimmy Fallon began his show with a Clooney M., to red

flag the first joke of his monologue as geo-relevant.

Jimmy: [Cl.M.] Thank-you for being here. It’s gonna be a fun show tonight. First some political news. Yesterday President Obama returns home to the U.S. after his nine day trip to Asia. He got to see some stuff he never sees at home, like jobs.

http://mkultragate.weebly.com/uploads/1/4/6/2/14622630/mkultra62.pdfhttp://mkultragate.weebly.com/uploads/1/4/6/2/14622630/mkultra71.pdf

Here’s an election update. Last week in New Hampshire [Prince Harry M.] Herman Cain said that presidents don’t need to know [bouncing Bl.M.] every detail of every country in the world. And he said he’s going to take that

message across America to all 30 states. [SNL M.] I think that’s his platform. All 30 of them.

That’s right Herman Cain said presidents don’t need to know every detail of every country. He said we should focus on our neighbor to the south, Mexico, and our neighbor to our north Cold Mexico. Cold Mexico?

Audience: That’s Canada. Steve: That’s Canada. Thank-you. Jimmy: Canada, Canada, Canada.* * coalition identifier

Then there’s what’s occurred on February 7th as documented in The

President’s Wife Joins Forces With Jimmy Fallon to Compel the White House’s

“Concrete Action”.

During the first moments of a comedy sketch that took place before the

interview, Jimmy employed the lexicon when his guest isn’t looking but the

rest of the back-channel audience was – Letterman and Erin M.s – to convey

how he’s going to use this appearance to advance partners’ interests.

President Obama, feeling the accumulation of condemnation and pressure

since March 2011 and recently over no follow through, couldn’t but grimace

and cringe throughout. The first came to him reacting to a geo-gesture and

saying “really enjoy spending time with him”, referring to a sports coach.

http://mkultragate.weebly.com/uploads/1/4/6/2/14622630/mkultra119.pdfhttp://mkultragate.weebly.com/uploads/1/4/6/2/14622630/mkultra119.pdfhttp://mkultragate.weebly.com/uploads/1/4/6/2/14622630/mkultra119.pdf

When Jimmy reminds him he’d met the First Lady (as documented supra),

there was another grimace because that initiative included her going on

record as saying matters critical to the coalition were going to move ahead

expeditiously. Because all of February and March and most of April had

come and gone and there was nothing but a pronouncement, words and

more words in the form of “come get your money”…

The Jimmy Fallon initiative was broadcast on February 7th and her demeanour couldn’t have been more opposite. She was poised, confident and obviously consented to the late night talk show host employing the lexicon, the Bl.M. [@ 2:22], so it could be linked to her statement “Are you ready to do this?”, referring to her husband not just saying he’ll undertake that which the coalition demands, but actually following through on it.

… he understood and felt exceptionally uncomfortable about it all.

Jimmy executes a Brooke M. to “I was thinking about your home life”, to

which he grimaces and his eyes drop. The objective here was to underscore

the traumatic effect publicity would have on his wife, children, parents and

relatives.

Another grimace comes when the host says “we all know what happened”,

employing an Erin M. to remind his guest everyone in the coalition is privy to

what the epiphany delivered, how he behaved since then, Congress’

authorization and his “come pick it up” communiqué.

Scripted to generate an analogy with what the President did in terms of

faltering in a most embarrassing and memorable way while in office, Jimmy

illustrates how some of his predecessors tripped or fell. He suggested his

guest manufacture an instance like this just for fun, stating “I like [Erin-O-S

M.] people tripping”.

The recipient knew exactly what he was saying and reacted with another

moment of guilt- and inadequacy- motivated discomfort. Jimmy glares at

him to accentuate the potency of the coalition critique.

Capitulation to what he was witnessing took the form of underscoring

Congress’ allocation: “The [O-S M.] single most important investment…”.

This is something one wouldn’t expect if there was an intention in the Oval

Office to contribute to and expedite the transference process. The question

that naturally arises is ‘Why is he still trying to sell this circumstance and

who is he making the argument to?’.

Did Jimmy feel satisfied with what he saw in response to his barrage? No,

because when the President finished talking about the adverse effects on

Super PACs he described what was going on behind the coalition’s back as

“crazy”, stating “It’s pretty crazy when you think about it [Eva M.]”. It’s

preceded with another guest grimace to “That’s part of our democracy we’re

going to have to fix”.

A second scripted confrontation came during the part of the interview Jimmy

read Tweets from his audience. At one point his guest asks if he should

Tweet a submitter back. The host reminds him “In 140 characters or less”.

Then a long answer is given to an inquiry. Jimmy jokes what he heard was

3,000 characters, adding “you were over about 2,000”.